Abstract
Let \([n]=(1-q^n)/(1-q)\) denote the q-integer and \(\Phi _n(q)\) the nth cyclotomic polynomial in q. Recently, Guo and Schlosser provided two conjectures: For any odd integer \(n>3\), modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\),
and modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\),
where \((a;q)_k=(1-a)(1-aq)\cdots (1-aq^{k-1})\). In this paper, we confirm these two conjectures and further give their generalizations involving two free parameters. Our proof uses Guo and Zudilin’s ‘creative microscoping’ method and the Chinese remainder theorem for coprime polynomials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the past few years, many q-congruences and q-supercongruences have been established by different authors. See, for example, [2, 4,5,6,7,8, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In particular, Guo and Schlosser [9, Theorem 5.5] proved that, for any odd integer \(n>3\),
where the q-shifted factorial is defined by
For convenience, we adopt the notation
The q-integer is defined by \([n]=[n]_q=(1-q^n)/(1-q)=1+q+\cdots +q^{n-1}\). Moreover, \(\Phi _n(q)\) represents the nth cyclotomic polynomial in q, which may be defined as
with \(\zeta \) being an nth primitive root of unity.
Guo and Schlosser [9, Conjecture 5.6] also proposed the following conjecture: for any odd integer \(n>3\),
It is known from [9] that, letting \(a \rightarrow 1\) in (1.2), we are led to
which is a refinement of the q-supercongruence (1.1).
Additionally, Guo and Schlosser [9, Conjecture 5.8] provided another similar conjecture: for any odd integer \(n>3\),
Likewise, when \(a \rightarrow 1\) in (1.3), we obtain
Inspired by Guo and Schlosser’s work, we shall prove these two conjectures in this paper. Our proof relies on the following theorem, which may be deemed as a generalization of the q-supercongruences (1.2) and (1.3).
Theorem 1
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer and \(r\in \{0,2\}\). Then, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\), we have
where
Further, for the \(r=0\) and \(a \rightarrow 1\) case of Theorem 1, we have the following stronger conclusion.
Theorem 2
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
where \(M \in \{(n+1)/2,n-2\}\) and
Putting \(c \rightarrow 1\) and \(d \rightarrow \infty \) in Theorem 2, we obtain the following result.
Corollary 3
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then, modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\),
When \(M=(p^l+1)/2\) and \(q \rightarrow 1\) in (1.6), we are led to the following: for odd prime \(p>3\),
where l is a positive integer, and the notation will be used frequently in this section.
Moreover, the case \(c \rightarrow 1\), \(d \rightarrow 1\) of Theorem 2 yields the following q-supercongruence.
Corollary 4
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then, modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\),
Putting \(M=(p^l+1)/2\) and \(q \rightarrow 1\) in (1.7), we gain the following: for odd prime \(p>3\),
In addition, letting \(r=2\) and \(a \rightarrow 1\) in Theorem 1, and applying the L’Hospital rule, we arrive at the following conclusion.
Theorem 5
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
where
Taking \(c \rightarrow q^{-2}\) and \(d \rightarrow \infty \) in Theorem 5, we obtain the following result.
Corollary 6
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
Letting \(n=p^l\) be an odd prime power greater than 3 and \(q \rightarrow 1\) in (1.9), we get
Likewise, putting \(c \rightarrow q^{-2}\) and \(d \rightarrow q^{-2}\) in Theorem 5, we get the following q-supercongruence.
Corollary 7
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
When \(n=p^r\) is an odd prime power greater than 3 and \(q \rightarrow 1\) in (1.10), we get
The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. Firstly, we present some lemmas which will be needed in the proof of Theorem 1 in Sect. 2. Then, we prove Theorem 1 and Guo and Schlosser’s conjectures (1.2) and (1.3) in Sect. 3. Our proof makes use of the ‘creative microscoping’ method which was recently introduced by Guo and Zudilin [10], and the Chinese remainder theorem for coprime polynomials. Finally, in Sect. 4, we give a proof of Theorem 2.
2 Some Lemmas
We shall make use of Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation [1, Appendix (III.18)], which can be expressed as
where the basic hypergeometric series \(_{s+1}\phi _s\) is defined as
with \(0<|z|<1\).
In this section, we shall give three lemmas, which will play an important role in our proof of Theorem 1.
Lemma 1
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer and \(r\in \{0,2\}\). Then
where \(M \in \{(n+1)/2,n-2\}\).
Proof
Let \(c_q(k)\) be the kth term on left-hand side of (2.2), i.e.,
Using the following q-congruence due to Guo and Schlosser [9, Lemma 3.1]
we have
This proves that
Since the numerator of \(c_q(k)\) contains the factor \((q;q^2)_k\), we see that \(c_q(k)\) is congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) for \((n+1)/2\le k\le n-2\). Thus, the proof of Lemma 1 is completed. \(\square \)
Lemma 2
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer and \(r\in \{0,2\}\). Then
where \(M \in \{(n+1)/2,n-2\}\).
Proof
When \(a=q^{-n}\) or \(q^n\), the left-hand side of (2.4) equals
Applying Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation (2.1), we obtain
which means that the q-supercongruence (2.4) holds modulo \(1-aq^n\) and \(a-q^n\). The proof then follows from Lemma 1 and the fact that \(\Phi _n(q)\), \(1-aq^n\) and \(a-q^n\) are pairwise relatively prime polynomials. \(\square \)
Lemma 3
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer and \(r\in \{0,2\}\). Then
where \(M \in \{(n+1)/2,n-2\}\).
Proof
Letting \(b=q^n\) in the left-hand side of the above relation, we have
which follows from the substitutions \(a= q, q \mapsto q^2, b= cq, c = dq, d = aq^{-1}, e = q^{-1}/a\), and \(N = (n+r-1)/2\) in Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation (2.1). Namely, Lemma 3 is true. \(\square \)
3 Proof of Theorem 1
Firstly, we need the following two q-congruences:
which can be found in Guo [3]. Employing the Chinese remainder theorem for coprime polynomials and combining Lemmas 2 and 3, we conclude that, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)(b-q^n)\),
where
Obviously, the q-supercongruence (3.1) can be expressed as modulo \(\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)(b-q^n)\),
Letting \(b \rightarrow 1\) in (3.2) and using the relation
we attain modulo \(\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)(b-q^n)\),
where
Noting \(q^n \equiv 1 \pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\) and recalling
which were first observed by Guo [3, Lemma 2.1], we are led to the following q-congruence: modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\),
The proof then follows from (3.3) and (3.4).
Obviously, Theorem 1 also holds true when the summation in the left-hand side of (1.4) is from 0 to \(n-2\).
We now prove (1.2) and (1.3) which were conjectured by Guo and Schlosser.
Proof of (1.2)
When \(cd=q\) and \(r=0\) in Theorem 1, we have
It remains to show that
For \(n>3\), let \(\zeta \ne 1\) be an nth root of unity, not necessarily primitive. Then \(\zeta \) must be a primitive mth root of unity with m|n. Let \(\alpha _q(k)\) denote the kth term on the left-hand side of (3.5):
Putting \(n=m\), \(cd=q\), \(r=0\) and \(b \rightarrow 1\) in Lemma 1, and since \(\alpha _\zeta (k)=0\) for \((m+1)/2<k \le m-1\), we are led to
Since
we immediately obtain
which shows that the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi _m(q)\) divides the sum \(\sum _{k=0}^{(n+1)/2}\alpha _q(k)\). In view of
the proof of (3.5) is completed and therefore (1.2) is true. \(\square \)
Proof of (1.3)
Likewise, letting \(cd=q\) and \(r=2\) in Theorem 1, we get (1.3) immediately. \(\square \)
4 Proof of Theorem 2
Through the L’Hospital rule, we have
Hence, when \(r=0\) and \(a \rightarrow 1\) in Theorem 1, we know that (1.5) holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^4\). It remains to show that
where \(M \in \{(n+1)/2,n-2\}\). Just like the proof of (3.5), let \(\zeta \ne 1\) be a primitive mth root of unity with m|n and let \(\beta _q(k)\) be the kth term on the left-hand side of (4.1), i.e.,
Fixing \(n=m\), \(a \rightarrow 1\), \(b\rightarrow 1\), and \(x=0\) in Lemma 1, and noticing that \(\beta _\zeta (k)=0\) for \((m+1)/2<k \le m-1\), we have
Similarly as before, we get
which means that the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi _m(q)\) divides the sums \(\sum _{k=0}^{(n+1)/2}\beta _q(k)\) and \(\sum _{k=0}^{n-2}\beta _q(k)\). Since
we immediately obtain (4.1). The q-supercongruence (1.5) then follows from the fact that [n] is coprime with the denominator of the right-hand side of (1.5).
References
Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: Basic Hypergeometric Series, Second Edition, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Gorodetsky, O.: \(q\)-Congruences, with applications to supercongruences and the cyclic sieving phenomenon. Int. J. Number Theory 15, 1919–1968 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W.: \(q\)-Supercongruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial via creative microscoping. Adv. Appl. Math. 120, Art. 102078 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: Proof of some \(q\)-supercongruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. Results Math. 75, Art. 77 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: Proof of a generalization of the (C.2) supercongruence of Van Hamme. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 115, Art. 45 (2021)
Guo, V.J.W.: Some variations of a ‘divergent’ Ramanujan-type \(q\)-supercongruence. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 27, 376–388 (2021)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: Proof of a basic hypergeometric supercongruence modulo the fifth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 25, 921–929 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: A new family of \(q\)-supercongruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. Results Math. 75, Art. 155 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: Some \(q\)-supercongruences from transformation formulas for basic hypergeometric series. Constr. Approx. 53, 155–200 (2021)
Guo, V.J.W., Zudilin, W.: A \(q\)-microscope for supercongruences. Adv. Math. 346, 329–358 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W., Zudilin, W.: Dwork-type supercongruences through a creative \(q\)-microscope. J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A 178, Art. 105362 (2021)
Li, L.: Some \(q\)-supercongruences for truncated forms of squares of basic hypergeometric series. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 27, 16–25 (2021)
Li, L., Wang, S.-D.: Proof of a \(q\)-supercongruence conjectured by Guo and Schlosser. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 114, Art. 190 (2020)
Liu, J.-C.: On a congruence involving \(q\)-Catalan numbers. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 358, 211–215 (2020)
Liu, J.-C., Petrov, F.: Congruences on sums of \(q\)-binomial coefficients. Adv. Appl. Math. 116, Art. 102003 (2020)
Liu, Y., Wang, X.: \(q\)-analogues of two Ramanujan-type supergcongruences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 502, 125238 (2021)
Ni, H.-X., Pan, H.: On a conjectured \(q\)-congruence of Guo and Zeng. Int. J. Number Theory 14(6), 1699–1707 (2018)
Ni, H.-X., Pan, H.: Divisibility of some binomial sums. Acta Arith. 194, 367–381 (2020)
Straub, A.: Supercongruences for polynomial analogs of the Apéry numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 147, 1023–1036 (2019)
Wang, X., Yu, M.: Some new \(q\)-congruences on double sums. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 115, Art. 1 (2021)
Wang, X., Yue, M.: A q-analogue of a Dwork-type supercongruences. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 103(2), 203–310 (2021)
Wang, X., Yue, M.: A \(q\)-analogue of the (A2) supercongruence of Van Hamme for any prime \(p\equiv 3~(mod \; 4)\). Int. J. Number Theory 16, 1325–1335 (2020)
Wang, X., Yue, M.: Some \(q\)-supercongruences from Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation formula. Results Math. 75 (2), Art. 71 (2020)
Wei, C.: Some \(q\)-supercongruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 182, 105469 (2021)
Zudilin, W.: Congruences for \(q\)-binomial coefficients. Ann. Combin. 23, 1123–1135 (2019)
Acknowledgements
The authors thanks the anonymous referee for many valuable comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (11661032)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, M., Wang, X. Proof of two conjectures of Guo and Schlosser. Ramanujan J 58, 239–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-021-00452-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-021-00452-5
Keywords
- q-congruence
- q-supercongruence
- Cyclotomic polynomial
- Basic hypergeometric series
- The Chinese remainder theorem