Abstract
For the very well-poised \(\Omega \)-series, a universal iteration pattern is established that yields numerous infinite series identities including several important ones discovered by Ramanujan (in Q J Pure Appl Math 45:350–372, 1914) and recently by Guillera.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction and motivation
Let \(\mathbb {N}\) be the set of natural numbers. The shifted factorial reads as \((x)_0=1\) and
It can be expressed, for an integer n (even nonpositive), by the quotient
where the \(\Gamma \)-function is defined by the Euler integral
and admits the well-known reciprocal relations
For the sake of brevity, we shall utilize, throughout the paper, the following multiparameter notations:
About one century ago, Ramanujan [58] discovered 17 remarkable infinite series for \(1/\pi \). Three typical ones [58, Eqs. 28, 29 and 35] are reproduced as
However their proofs were only obtained in the 1980s by the Borweins [23] and by the Chudnovskys [44] via modular equations. By using the powerful WZ-method, Guillera [48, 49, 51, 53] proved recently several important formulae of Ramanujan-like for \(1/\pi ^2\) such as
More comprehensive investigation has been made by Chu and Zhang [40, 42, 67] by manipulating the classical hypergeometric series.
The objective of the present paper is to show that numerous infinite series identities can be proved in a unified manner from a transformation theorem about the following well-poised series
provided that \(\mathfrak {R}(1+2a-b-c-d-e)>0\) for convergence. For the given nonnegative integers \(\{\rho _a,\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e\}\), the corresponding recurrence relation expressing
will be said of “iteration pattern” \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\). By exploring, in detail, the seven iteration patterns [20101], [20111], [30112], [30202], [30122], [31113], and [31111], Chu and Zhang [42] derived numerous infinite series formulae for \(\pi ^{\pm 1}, \pi ^{\pm 2}, \zeta (3)\) and the Catalan constant G, including several interesting identities discovered by Ramanujan [58] and recently by Guillera [47, 48, 51,52,53,54].
Instead of working on specific iteration patterns, we shall examine the universal iteration pattern for “\(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\)” and establish a general transformation. That contains the patterns mentioned above and those treated in [42] as particular cases. The proof is given in the next section.
Theorem A
For the five complex parameters \(\{a,b,c,d,e\}\) satisfying the condition \(\mathfrak {R}(1+2a-b-c-d-e)>0\) and the iteration pattern \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\) subject to \(\big |\Delta [\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\big |<1\), the following transformation formula holds:
where
-
\(H_k[\overset{.....}{\scriptstyle .....}]\) is the quotient of Pochhammer symbols defined by (16) and (18);
-
\(W_k[\overset{.....}{\scriptstyle .....}]\) is the rational weight factor defined recursively by (14) and (19);
-
\(\Delta [\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\) is the convergence rate defined by (20).
When one of parameters \(\{b,c,d,e\}\) is equal to a (for example \(e=a\)) in Theorem A, the sum on the left can be evaluated by Dougall’s summation formula (cf. [8, §4.4]) on well-poised \(_5F_4\)-series as the \(\Gamma \)-function quotient
This is analytic in the whole complex space of dimension 4 except for the hyperplanes determined by
which is covered also by the convergence domain of the infinite series displayed on the right-hand side of Theorem A. Therefore in this case, the transformation in Theorem A becomes the following closed formula:
where the parameter restriction \(\mathfrak {R}(1+a-b-c-d)>0\) is removed by analytic continuation. This clarifies the concern raised recently by Guillera [56] and justifies the validity of those examples appearing in the compendium [42] even though their parameter settings fail to comply the condition \(\mathfrak {R}(1+a-b-c-d)>0\). The situation with one of parameters \(\{b,c,d,e\}\) tending to \(-\infty \) can be treated analogously.
The transformation formula in Theorem A will enable us, in Sect. 3, not only to review various infinite series identities of Ramanujan–Guillera type, but also to find several new formulae and to confirm a few challenging conjectured ones. As anticipation, we highlight nine examples of new summation formulae as follows:
-
Example 6: Infinite series for \(\pi ^{-1}\)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{9\sqrt{3}}{2^{4/3}\pi } =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{1}{3},&{}\,\frac{2}{3},&{}\,\frac{1}{6}\\ \\ 1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1\end{array}\!\right] _k\frac{2+21k}{(-27)^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 7: Infinite series for \(\pi ^{-1}\)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{27\sqrt{3}}{2^{5/3}\pi } =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{1}{3},&{}\,\frac{2}{3},&{}\,\frac{5}{6}\\ \\ 1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1\end{array}\!\right] _k\frac{5+42k}{(-27)^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 18: Infinite series for \(\pi \)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{15 \pi }{8 \sqrt{2}} =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}1,&{}\,\frac{1}{4},&{}\,\frac{1}{4}\\ \\ \frac{7}{4},&{}\,\frac{9}{8},&{}\,\frac{13}{8} \end{array}\!\right] _k \frac{4+13k+12k^2}{4^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 19: Infinite series for \(\pi \)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{21 \pi }{8 \sqrt{2}} =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}1,&{}\,\frac{3}{4},&{}\,\frac{3}{4}\\ \\ \frac{5}{4},&{}\,\frac{11}{8},&{}\,\frac{15}{8} \end{array}\!\right] _k \frac{4+15k+12k^2}{4^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 24: Infinite series for \(\pi \)
$$\begin{aligned} {\pi \sqrt{3}} =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}1,&{}\,\frac{3}{4},&{}\,\frac{5}{4}\\ \\ \frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{3}{2}\end{array}\!\right] _k \frac{5+8k}{9^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 34: Infinite series for \(\pi ^2\)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\pi ^2}{2} =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}\frac{1}{2},&{}\,\frac{1}{2},&{}\,\frac{1}{2}\\ \\ \frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{5}{4},&{}\,\frac{7}{4}\end{array}\!\right] _k \frac{5+14k+10k^2}{(-4)^k\,(k+1)^2}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 38: Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.1]
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{3\pi ^2}{4} =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \Big (\frac{2}{27}\Big )^k \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccc}1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1\\ \\ \frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{4}{3},&{}\,\frac{5}{3}\end{array}\!\right] _k \Big \{7+10k\Big \}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 67: Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.6]
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{21}{2}\zeta (3) =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1\\ \\ \frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{4}{3},&{}\,\frac{5}{3}\end{array}\!\right] _k \frac{13+38k+28k^2}{(-27)^k}. \end{aligned}$$ -
Example 75: Guillera’s conjecture [55, Eq. 42]
$$\begin{aligned} 210\zeta (3) =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \Big (\frac{-4^4\,}{5^5}\Big )^k \left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1,&{}\,1\\ \\ \frac{3}{2},&{}\,\frac{6}{5},&{}\,\frac{7}{5},&{}\,\frac{8}{5},&{}\,\frac{9}{5}\end{array}\!\right] _k \Big \{268+721k+483k^2\Big \}. \end{aligned}$$
2 Proof of the main theorem
For the \(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\) series, Chu and Zhang [42] derived several useful recurrence relations. By means of the iteration procedure, we shall utilize two of them (see Lemmas B and C in Appendix) to prove Theorem A.
2.1 Iteration of Lemma B
Iterating \(\lambda \)-times of the recurrence relation displayed in Lemma B, we get the expression:
where the \(\mathcal {A}_{\lambda }\) and \(\mathcal {B}_{\lambda }\) coefficients are given by
According to (4), by applying Lemma B successively
we derive the following transformation formula:
where for the sake of brevity, the notations are adopted:
Furthermore, we can simplify the product
2.2 Iteration of Lemma C
Instead, iterating \(\mu \)-times of the recurrence relation displayed in Lemma C, we get the expression:
where the \(\mathcal {C}_{\mu }\) and \(\mathcal {D}_{\mu }\) coefficients read as
In view of (8), by applying Lemma C successively
we obtain another transformation formula
where for the sake of consistence, we have utilized the notations:
In addition, we can simplify the product explicitly
2.3 Combined Iteration
Under the replacements
the connection coefficients
will be denoted by
By combining the two transformations (7) and (11), we get the recurrence relation
where the W and H coefficients are given explicitly by
and the “iteration pattern” [\(\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e\)] is defined by
that satisfies the inequality
By means of the induction principle on \(\rho _a\), it can be shown that for any quintuple nonnegative integers \(\{\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e\}\) satisfying the above inequality, they form an iteration pattern [\(\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e\)]; i.e., there exist nonnegative integers \(\{bb,cc,dd,ee,bc,bd,be,cd,ce,de\}\) such that the linear system (15) holds.
In addition, we can check the following quotient expression of shifted factorials
There are the following connections between iteration patterns and the corresponding transformations.
-
For the fixed nonnegative integers \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\), they will become the iteration pattern of a transformation if and only if there exists a solution of the linear system (15) in nonnegative integers, which is, in turn, equivalent to the condition \(\rho _a\le \rho _b+\rho _c+\rho _d+\rho _e\le 2\rho _a\).
-
Different solutions of the system (15) determine formally different transformations (12). However, they are substantially equivalent because there is a unique difference equation of \(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\) for the fixed pattern \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\).
-
According to the explicit expression (16) of the function \(H\left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}a;&{}\,b,&{}\,c,&{}\,d,&{}\,e\\ \rho _a;&{}\,\rho _b,&{}\,\rho _c,&{}\,\rho _d,&{}\,\rho _e\end{array}\!\right] \), it becomes obvious that this function depends essentially upon the iteration pattern \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\), but not individual solutions.
By iterating n-times the relation displayed in (12), we derive the following partial sum expression
where
For an integer variable x, let the \(\delta \)-function be given by
Define further a quotient associated with an iteration pattern [\(\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e\)] by
By means of the Weierstrass M-test on uniformly convergent series, the rightmost term displayed in (17) is asymptotically determined by
Consequently, Theorem A follows from the limiting case \(n\rightarrow \infty \) of (17) under the convergence conditions \(\mathfrak {R}(1+2a-b-c-d-e)>0\) and \(\big |\Delta [\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\big |<1\).
\(\square \)
3 Classified infinite series identities
Further applications of Theorem A will be investigated, in this section, for detecting infinite series identities. This will be fulfilled almost automatically by an appropriately devised Mathematica package, which is described as follows.
-
Fixing the parameters \(\{a,b,c,d,e\}\), evaluate the corresponding \(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\) in terms of the \(\Gamma \)-function quotient by Dougall’s theorem on the well-poised \(_5F_4\)-series and the limiting relations appearing in Chu and Zhang [42, §2.5 and Corollary 6].
-
Specifying the iteration pattern \([\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\), determine, by (20), the convergence rate \(\Delta [\rho _a;\rho _b,\rho _c,\rho _d,\rho _e]\) for the corresponding infinite series.
-
Factorizing the rational weight function \(W_k\left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}a;&{}\,b,&{}\,c,&{}\,d,&{}\,e\\ \rho _a;&{}\,\rho _b,&{}\,\rho _c,&{}\,\rho _d,&{}\,\rho _e\end{array}\!\right] \), identify its largest irreducible polynomial factor and all the linear factors.
-
Writing \(H_k\left[ \!\begin{array}{ccccc}a;&{}\,b,&{}\,c,&{}\,d,&{}\,e\\ \rho _a;&{}\,\rho _b,&{}\,\rho _c,&{}\,\rho _d,&{}\,\rho _e\end{array}\!\right] \) in terms of canonical shifted factorials of order k (but not its multiples), combine them with the linear factors extracted from the weight function \(W_k\) together.
-
Display the resulting identity. In particular, when the \(\Gamma \)-function quotient is expressible in terms of \(\pi ^{\pm 1}\), \(\pi ^{\pm 2}\), \(\zeta (3)\) and other known mathematical constants, write down the corresponding infinite series formulae.
Following this procedure, we have made a comprehensive exploration of infinite series identities. The results are displayed as examples in nine classes and classified according to the represented mathematical constants, that cover not only numerous known infinite series, but also several new important formulae including a few challenging conjectured series made experimentally by Guillera [55] and Sun [62].
In order to illustrate the approach, three examples are worked out in detail.
[Example 23] In Theorem A, let
According to Dougall’s summation theorem, we can evaluate
By means of (16) and (18), we have
With the aid of Mathematica commands implemented from (14) and (19), we can also determine
Then the corresponding formula in Theorem A
is evidently equivalent to the identity displayed in Example 23:
\(\square \)
[Example 45] In Theorem A, let
We can analogously evaluate
Then the corresponding formula in Theorem A
becomes, after some simplification, the identity displayed in Example 45:
\(\square \)
[Example 67]. In Theorem A, let
In this case, we have
where P(k) is a polynomial of degree 7 given by
Then the corresponding formula in Theorem A
results in the following series:
This series can be simplified futher. In fact, for the \(\Lambda \)-sequence defined by
it is not hard to verify that the summand can be expressed as
In view of the bisection series, we conclude that
which justifies the infinite series for \(\zeta (3)\) displayed in Example 67:
\(\square \)
As shown above, all the series manipulations involved are entirely routine. Therefore for the other series in this section, their proofs will not be produced. In order to be concise, we shall indicate, in the header for each example, eventual references and how to derive the formula by \(\Omega [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{\rho _a\rho _b\rho _c\rho _d\rho _e}{a\,\;b\,\;c\,\;d\,\;e}]\), where \([a\,b\,c\,d\,e]\) and \([\rho _a\rho _b\rho _c\rho _d\rho _e]\) stand respectively for the parameter setting and the iteration pattern in the \(\Omega \)-series.
3.1 Series for \(\pi ^{-1}\)
Here we record 15 infinite series identities with four of them due to Ramanujan [58]. For different proofs of these identities and more formulae for \(1/\pi \), refer to Andrews and Berndt [6, §15.6], Baruah and Berndt [16, 18], Berndt et al. [20, 21], Borwein et al. [24,25,26,27, 30], Chan et al. [34,35,36], Guillera [50, 51], Rogers [60] and Scarpello and Ritelli [61].
Example 1
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\;1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty }\big ]\) Ramanujan [58, Eq. 28])
Example 2
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}}\big ]\) Ramanujan [58, Eq. 35])
Example 3
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\;1}{\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{4}\infty }\big ]\) Guillera [51, Table 2:3])
Example 4
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{6}\frac{5}{6}}\big ]\) Trisection series: Ramanujan [58, Eq. 40])
Example 5
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{3}}\big ]\))
Example 6
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{5}{6}\frac{5}{6}\frac{5}{6}\frac{5}{6}\frac{2}{3}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 7
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{6}\frac{1}{6}\frac{1}{6}\frac{1}{6}\frac{1}{3}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 8
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{4}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 9
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 10
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\;2}{\frac{2}{3}\frac{2}{3}\frac{2}{3}\frac{2}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 11
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\;2}{\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 12
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty \frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 13
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,2\,0\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty \frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 14
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,2\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}}\big ]\))
Example 15
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\;1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty }\big ]\) Ramanujan [58, Eq. 29])
3.2 Series for \(\pi \)
Example 16
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,01\,1\;1}{1\frac{2}{3}1\frac{1}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 17
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,1\;1}{1\frac{1}{3}1\frac{2}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 18
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,1\;1}{1\frac{3}{4}1\frac{1}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 19
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,1\;1}{1\frac{1}{4}1\frac{3}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 20
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,1\;1}{11\frac{1}{6}\frac{5}{6}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 21
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,0\;1}{1\frac{1}{3}1\frac{2}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 22
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}}\big ]\))
Example 23
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,1\,1}{1\frac{1}{3}1\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 24
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,011\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}1\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}}\big ]\) Trisection series: Chu [41, Example 19])
Example 25
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,1\,12}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}1}\big ]\))
Example 26
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{411\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}}\big ]\) Quartic section series: Zhang [67, Example 8])
Example 27
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,1\,12}{1\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 28
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{311\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 29
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{1\infty \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 30
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{31\,11\,3}{1\frac{1}{3}1\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
3.3 Series for \(\pi ^2\)
Example 31
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,0\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Bisection series: Guillera [53, §2.1: \(a=\frac{1}{2}\)])
Example 32
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,1\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Chu [40, Theorem 3.1] with \(\big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{1\,0\,1\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{2}\frac{3}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 33
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1\,}{2111\infty }\big ]\) Chu [40, Theorem 3.1] with \(\big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{1012}{1122}\big ]\))
Example 34
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0111}{2\frac{3}{2}111}\big ]\))
Example 35
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,01}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}1\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\) Guillera [53, §3.3: \(a=\frac{1}{2}\)])
Example 36
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3011\,2}{2111\frac{3}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 37
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,011\,2}{\frac{3}{2}1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 38
(Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.1])
This is confirmed, via bisection series, by applying Theorem 3.1 of Chu [40] under the parameter setting \(\big [{1,1,2,3}\,|\,{\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{3}{2},\tfrac{3}{2}}\big ]\).
Example 39
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,02\,02}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}1\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 40
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,2\,0\,2}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}1\infty 1}\big ]\) Zhang [67, Example 1]: Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.2])
Example 41
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3012\,2}{2111\frac{3}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 42
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,1\,2\,2}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 43
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3111\;1}{2111\infty }\big ]\) Guillera [53, §2.2: \(a=\frac{1}{2}\)])
This is rederived from Theorem 3.1 of Chu [40] under the parameter setting \(\big [{1122}\,|\,{1122}\big ]\).
Example 44
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3011\,3}{2111\frac{3}{2}}\big ]\) Guillera [54, Eq. 18])
Example 45
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3111\,1}{2111\frac{3}{2}}\big ]\))
3.4 Series for \(\pi ^{-2}\)
Guillera [51,52,53] developed intensively the computer algebra approach via the WZ-method, reviewed systematically the formulae discovered by Ramanujan [58], found further \(\pi \)-formulae of Ramanujan-type and detected experimentally several beautiful and challenging series representations for \(1/\pi ^2\) (cf. [47,48,49]). More formulae of similar type can be found in Bailey et al. [15, §2.7], Baruah and Berndet [17], Chu [39] and Zudilin [69, 70].
Example 46
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Guillera [48, Eqs. 1–3])
Example 47
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 48
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Guillera [48, Eqs. 1–2])
Example 49
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 50
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\,3}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}0}\big ]\) Guillera [54, Eq. 17])
Example 51
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,13}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}1}\big ]\))
Example 52
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Guillera [48, Eq. 1-1])
3.5 Series for Catalan constant G
Example 53
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\;1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 54
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\;1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 55
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,010\,1}{\frac{3}{2}111\infty }\big ]\))
Example 56
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\;3}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty }\big ]\) Bisection series: Guillera [53, §2.3: \(a=\frac{1}{2}\)])
Example 57
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,11\;2}{\frac{3}{2}111\infty }\big ]\))
Example 58
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,1\,1\,2}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\infty \frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 59
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,020\;2}{\frac{3}{2}111\infty }\big ]\))
Example 60
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{301\;2\,2}{\frac{3}{2}1\infty 11}\big ]\))
3.6 Series for \(\zeta (3)\)
We give 15 spectacular series for \(\zeta (3)\).
Example 61
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0101}{\frac{3}{2}111\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 62
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0111}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}111}\big ]\) Guillera [53, §3.1: \(a=\frac{1}{2}\)])
Example 63
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,1\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 64
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,0\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 65
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20101}{21111}\big ]\))
Example 66
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30112}{21111}\big ]\) Amdelberhan [4] and Wilf [64, Eq. 8])
Example 67
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Bisection series: Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.6])
Example 68
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0202}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}111}\big ]\))
Example 69
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0122}{\frac{3}{2}1\frac{1}{2}11}\big ]\))
Example 70
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0122}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}111}\big ]\))
Example 71
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30111}{21111}\big ]\))
Example 72
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{31111}{21111}\big ]\) Amdeberhan and Zeilberger [5])
Example 73
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\,1}{1\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 74
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{40112}{21111}\big ]\))
Example 75
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{6\,1\,1\,4\,4}{\frac{3}{2}\frac{1}{2}\,1\,1\,1}\big ]\) Bisection series: Guillera’s conjecture [55, Eq. 42])
3.7 Apéry-like series
They are infinite series expressions for the Riemann zeta series \(\zeta (m)\) involving central binomial coefficients. The formulae of this kind first appear in the irrationality proof of \(\zeta (3)\) given by Apéry [7]; see Van der Poorten [63] for a very readable version of this work. More formulae of similar type and extensions can be found in the books by Borwein and Borwein [23, §11] and Comtet [45, Page 89], as well as the papers by Almkvist et al. [3], Bailey et al. [9, 11, 14], Borwein et al. [28, 29, 31], Chu and Zheng [37, 38, 43], Elsner [46], Lehmer [57], Rivoal [59], Zagier [65] and Zucker [68].
Example 76
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2011\,1}{2111\infty }\big ]\) Apéry [7]: see [46, 63, 68])
Example 77
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20111}{21111}\big ]\) Apéry [7]: see [46, 63, 68])
Example 78
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,10\,1}{1\frac{1}{3}1\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Bisection series: Apéry [7]; see [46, 57, 63])
Example 79
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1}{1\frac{1}{4}1\frac{3}{4}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\) Quartic section series: Elsner [46])
Example 80
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1}{11\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}}\big ]\) Bisection series: Lehmer [57])
Example 81
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{20\,1\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}\infty }\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 82
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
3.8 BBP-type formulae
They are formulae for calculating \(\pi \) discovered firstly by Bailey et al. [12] in 1995, which may serve amazingly as digit-extraction algorithms for \(\pi \). We refer to Adamchik and Wagon [1, 2] for Mathematica-based approach and to Bailey et al. [9, 10, 12, 13] for historical accounts. Further formulae of BBP-type can be found in Bellard [19], Borwein and Bailey [22, §3.6], Chan [32, 33] and Zhang [66].
Example 83
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}\frac{1}{4}}\big ]\) Bailey et al. [12, Theorem 1])
Example 84
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}}\big ]\) Adamchik and Wagon [1])
Example 85
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{201\,0\,1}{11\frac{2}{3}\frac{5}{6}\frac{1}{6}}\big ]\))
Example 86
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{5}{6}\frac{5}{6}\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{6}\frac{1}{6}}\big ]\))
Example 87
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{301\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 88
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{301\,1\,1}{11\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{6}\frac{5}{6}}\big ]\) Bisection series)
Example 89
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{30\,1\,1\,2}{11\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 90
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{301\,1\,2}{11\frac{1}{3}\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
3.9 Other infinte series
Example 91
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 92
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\,0\,1\,0\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{5}{6}\frac{1}{6}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 93
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 94
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 95
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,0\,1\,1\,2}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{3}{4}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 96
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\,1}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{6}\frac{5}{6}\infty }\big ]\))
Example 97
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{3\,1\,1\,1\,3}{\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}}\big ]\))
Example 98
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{6\,1144}{2\frac{3}{2}111}\big ]\) Bisection series)
The next example confirms a conjectured series about the Legendre symbol \(\big (\frac{k}{3}\big )\).
Example 99
(\(\Omega \big [\genfrac{}{}{0.0pt}1{2\;0\,1\,1\,1}{1,\frac{2}{3}\frac{2}{3}\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{3}}\big ]\) Sun’s conjecture [62, Eq. 1.4])
Finally, we point out that it is highly possible that most of the infinite series presented in this section can be verified automatically by symbolic languages, besides those examples attributed explicitly to the WZ-method, mainly done by Guillera [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
References
Adamchik, V., Wagon, S.: \(\pi \): A 2000-year search changes direction. Math. Educ. Res. 5(1), 11–19 (1996)
Adamchik, V., Wagon, S.: A simple formula for \(\pi \). Am. Math. Mon. 104, 852–855 (1997)
Almkvist, G., Granville, A.: Borwein and Bradley’s Apéry-like formulae for \(\zeta (4n+3)\). Exp. Math. 8, 197–203 (1999)
Amdeberhan, T.: Faster and faster convergent series for \(\zeta (3)\). Electron. J. Combin. 3, 1–2 (1996)
Amdeberhan, T., Zeilberger, D.: Hypergeometric series acceleration via the WZ method, Electron. J. Combin. (The Wilf Festschrift Volume) 4, #R3 (1997)
Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook (Part II). Springer, New York (2009)
Apéry, R.: Irrationalité de \(\zeta (2)\) et \(\zeta (3)\). Astérisque 61, 11–13 (1979)
Bailey, W.N.: Generalized Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1935)
Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Experimental mathematics: Recent developments and future outlook. In: Mathematics Unlimited—2001 and Beyond. Springer, Berlin, pp. 51–66 (2001)
Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Experimental mathematics: examples, methods and implications. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 52(5), 502–514 (2005)
Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Computer-assisted discovery and proof. In: Moll, V. (ed.) Tapas in Experimental Mathematics. Contemporary in Mathematics, pp. 21–52. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)
Bailey, D., et al.: On the rapid computation of various polylogarithmic constants. Math. Comput. 66(218), 903–913 (1997)
Bailey, D.H., et al.: The quest for \(\pi \). Math. Intelli. 19(1), 50–57 (1997)
Bailey, D.H., et al.: Experimental determination of Apéry-like identities for \(\zeta (2n+2)\). Exp. Math. 15(3), 281–289 (2006)
Bailey, D.H., et al.: Experimental Mathematics in Action. A K Peters, Wellesley (2007)
Baruah, N.D., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s series for \(1/\pi \) arising from his cubic and quartic theories of elliptic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 341(1), 357–371 (2008)
Baruah, N.D., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Eisenstein series and new hypergeometric-like series for \(1/\pi ^2\). J. Approx. Theory 160(1–2), 135–153 (2009)
Baruah, N.D., Berndt, B.C.: Eisenstein series and Ramanujan-type series for \(1/\pi \). Ramanujan J. 23, 17–44 (2010)
Bellard, F.: A new formula to compute the \(n\)th binary digit of pi. Preprint (1997). http://bellard.org/pi/pi_bin.pdf
Berndt, B.C., Chan, H.H.: Eisenstein series and aproximations to \(\pi \). Ill. J. Math. 45, 75–90 (2001)
Berndt, B.C., et al.: On Ramanujan’s quartic theory of elliptic functions. J. Number Theory 88, 129–156 (2001)
Borwein, J.M., Bailey, D.H.: Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. A K Peters, Wellesley (2004)
Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B.: Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity. Wiley, New York (1987)
Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B.: Ramanujan’s rational and algebraic series for \(1/\pi \). J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 51, 147–160 (1987)
Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B.: Ramanujan and \(\pi \). Sci. Am. 258(2), 112–117 (1988)
Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B.: More Ramanujan-type series for \(1/pi \). In: Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C., Rankin, R.A. (eds.) “Ramanujan Revisited”: Proceedings of the Centenary Conference (Urbana–Champaign, 1987), pp. 359–374. Academic Press, Boston (1988)
Borwein, J.M., Borwein, P.B.: Class number three Ramanujan type series for \(1/\pi \). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 46, 281–290 (1993)
Borwein, J.M., Bradley, D.M.: Empirically determined Apéry-like formulae for \(\zeta (4n+3)\). Exp. Math. 6(3), 181–194 (1997)
Borwein, J.M., Girgensohn, R.: Evaluations of binomial series. Aequ. Math. 70, 25–36 (2005)
Borwein, J.M., et al.: Ramanujan, modular equations, and approximations to pi, or how to compute one billion digits of \(\pi \). Am. Math. Mon. 96, 201–219 (1989)
Borwein, J.M., et al.: Central binomial sums, multiple Clausen values, and zeta values. Exp. Math. 10, 25–34 (2001)
Chan, H.C.: More formulas for \(\pi \). Am. Math. Mon. 113(5), 452–455 (2006)
Chan, H.C.: Machin-type formulas expressing \(\pi \) in terms of \(\phi \). Fibonacci Q. 46/47(1), 32–37 (2009)
Chan, H.H., Liaw, W.C.: Cubic modular equations and new Ramanujan-type series for \(1/\pi \). Pac. J. Math. 192, 219–238 (2000)
Chan, H.H., et al.: Ramanujan’s class invariant \(\lambda n\) and a new class of series for \(1/\pi \). J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 64, 93–106 (2001)
Chan, H.H., et al.: Domb’s numbers and Ramanujan-Sato type series for \(1/\pi \). Adv. Math. 186, 396–410 (2004)
Chu, W.: Hypergeometric series and the Riemann zeta function. Acta Arith. 82, 103–118 (1997)
Chu, W.: Symmetric functions and the Riemann zeta series. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 31(12), 1677–1689 (2000)
Chu, W.: \(\pi \)-Formulas implied by Dougall’s summation theorem for \(_5F_4\)-series. Ramanujan J. 26(2), 251–255 (2011)
Chu, W.: Dougall’s bilateral \(_2H_2\)-series and Ramanujan-like \(\pi \)-formulae. Math. Comput. 80(276), 2223–2251 (2011)
Chu, W.: \(q\)-Series reciprocities and further \(\pi \)-formulae. Kodai Math. J. 41(3), 512–530 (2018)
Chu, W., Zhang, W.: Accelerating Dougall’s \(_5F_4\)-sum and infinite series involving \(\pi \). Math. Comput. 83(285), 475–512 (2014)
Chu, W., Zheng, D.: Infinite series with harmonic numbers and central binomial coefficients. Int. J. Number Theory 5(3), 429–448 (2009)
Chudnovsky, D.V., Chudnovsky, G.V.: Approximations and complex multiplication according to Ramanujan. In: Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C., Rankin, R.A. (eds.) “Ramanujan Revisited”: Proceedings of the Centenary Conference (Urbana–Champaign, 1987), pp. 375–472. Academic Press, Boston (1988)
Comtet, L.: Advanced Combinatorics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)
Elsner, C.: On sums with binomial coefficients. Fibonacci Q. 43(1), 31–45 (2005)
Guillera, J.: Some binomial series obtained by the WZ-method. Adv. Appl. Math. 29(4), 599–603 (2002)
Guillera, J.: About a new kind of Ramanujan-type series. Exp. Math. 12(4), 507–510 (2003)
Guillera, J.: A new method to obtain series for \(1/\pi \) and \(1/\pi ^2\). Exp. Math. 15(1), 83–89 (2006)
Guillera, J.: A class of conjectured series representations for \(1/\pi \). Exp. Math. 15(4), 409–414 (2006)
Guillera, J.: Generators of some Ramanujan formulas. Ramanujan J. 11(1), 41–48 (2006)
Guillera, J.: Series de Ramanujan: Generalizaciones y Conjeturas. PhD thesis, Universidad de Zaragoza (2007)
Guillera, J.: Hypergeometric identities for 10 extended Ramanujan-type series. Ramanujan J. 15(2), 219–234 (2008)
Guillera, J.: A new Ramanujan-like series for \(1/\pi ^2\). Ramanujan J. 26(3), 369–374 (2011)
Guillera, J.: Bilateral sums related to Ramanujan-like series. arXiv:1610.04839 [math.NT] (2016)
Guillera, J.: Dougall’s \(_5F_4\) sum and the WZ algorithm. Ramanujan J. 46(3), 667–675 (2018)
Lehmer, D.H.: Interesting series involving the central binomial coefficient. Am. Math. Mon. 92, 449–457 (1985)
Ramanujan, S.: Modular equations and approximations to \(\pi \). Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 45, 350–372 (1914)
Rivoal, T.: Simultaneous generation of Koecher and Almkvist-Granville’s Apéry-like formulae. Exp. Math. 13(4), 503–508 (2004)
Rogers, M.D.: New \(_5F_4\) hypergeometric transformations, three-variable Mahler measures, and formulas for \(1/\pi \). Ramanujan J. 18, 327–340 (2009)
Scarpello, G.M., Ritelli, D.: The hyperelliptic integrals and \(\pi \). J. Number Theory 129, 3094–3108 (2009)
Sun, Z. W.: List of conjectural series for powers of \(\pi \) and other constants. arXiv:1102.5649 [math.CA] (2014)
Van der Poorten, A.: A proof that Euler missed...Apéry’s proof of the irrationality of \(\zeta (3)\) (An informal report). Math. Intell. 1, 195–203 (1978/1979)
Wilf, H.S.: Accelerated series for universal constants by the WZ method. Discret. Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 3, 189–192 (1999)
Zagier, D.: Values of zeta functions and their applications. In: First European Congress of Mathematics, vol. II. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 497–512 (1994)
Zhang, W.: New formulae of BBP-type with different moduli. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398(1), 46–60 (2013)
Zhang, W.: Common extension of the Watson and Whipple sums and Ramanujan-like \(\pi \)-formulae. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 26(8), 600–618 (2015)
Zucker, I.J.: On the series \(\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }\Big (\begin{array}{c}{2k}\\{k}\end{array}\Big )^{-1}k^{-n}\) and related sums. J. Number Theory 20(1), 92–102 (1985)
Zudilin, W.: More Ramanujan-type formulae for \(1/\pi ^2\) (Russian). Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 62(3), 211–212 (2007); Translation in Russian Math. Surveys 62(3), 634–636 (2007)
Zudilin, W.: Ramanujan-type formulae for \(1/\pi \): a second wind? In: Modular Forms and String Duality, pp. 179–188. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)
Acknowledgements
The author expresses his sincere gratitude to an anonymous referee for the careful reading, critical comments and helpful suggestions that make the manuscript improved during revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Two useful recurrence relations
Appendix: Two useful recurrence relations
Chu and Zhang [42] examined \(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\) mainly by utilizing the following two recurrence relations of iteration patterns [11000] and [11100], respectively.
Lemma B
(Chu and Zhang [42, Lemma 1]: \(\mathfrak {R}(1+2a-b-c-d-e)>0\)).
Lemma C
(Chu and Zhang [42, Lemma 2]: \(\mathfrak {R}(1+2a-b-c-d-e)>0\)).
They have been employed further, in this paper, to establish the central transformation Theorem A of universal iteration pattern for \(\Omega (a;b,c,d,e)\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, W. Infinite series identities derived from the very well-poised \(\Omega \)-sum. Ramanujan J 55, 239–270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-020-00259-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-020-00259-w
Keywords
- Infinite series of Ramanujan-type
- Apéry series
- Formula of BBP-type
- Bisection series
- Dougall’s formula for well-poised series