Abstract
Quantum discord Q is a function of density matrix elements. The domain of such a function in the case of two-qubit system with X density matrix may consist of three subdomains at most: two ones where the quantum discord is expressed in closed analytical forms (\(Q_{\pi /2}\) and \(Q_0\)) and an intermediate subdomain for which, to extract the quantum discord \(Q_{\theta }\), it is required to solve numerically a one-dimensional minimization problem to find the optimal measurement angle \(\theta \in (0,\pi /2)\). Hence, the quantum discord is given by a piecewise analytical–numerical formula \(Q=\min \{Q_{\pi /2},Q_{\theta },Q_0\}\). It is shown that the boundaries between the subdomains consist of bifurcation points. The \(Q_{\theta }\) subdomains are discovered in the dynamical phase flip channel model, in the anisotropic spin systems at thermal equilibrium, and in the heteronuclear dimers in an external magnetic field. We found that the transitions between \(Q_{\theta }\) subdomain and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) and \(Q_0\) ones occur suddenly, but continuously and smoothly, i.e., nonanalyticity is hidden and can be observed in higher order derivatives of discord function.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
At present, we have a situation where further miniaturization of electronics will inevitably lead to molecular size components. Designing such components requires application of the laws of quantum mechanics. This is expected to lead to a technological breakthrough which will be achieved through employing the holy of holies of the quantum theory—so-called quantum correlations.
Initially, the entanglement has been considered as a quantum correlation [1, 2]. Quantum entanglement is able to bind different parts of systems, even in the case when there is no interaction between those parts (the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen effect). By this, a change in the state of one subsystem can lead to a change in the state of the other subsystem. Later, this unusual property of quantum entangled states was proved in different experiments.
Quantum entanglement exists only in nonseparable states of bi- and multipartite systems. However, it appears in the last years that there are quantum correlations more general and more fundamental than entanglement. In particular, they can be present in certain separable states, i.e., when the quantum entanglement is absent. As a measure of total purely quantum correlations in bipartite systems, the quantum discord is employed now [3–5]. The basis for the discord conception is the idea of measurements performed on a system and maximum amount of classical information being extracted with their help.
Due to the fact that it is necessary to solve the optimization problem, the evaluation of quantum correlations, especially discord, is extremely hard [6]. If for the two-qubit systems the quantum entanglement of formation has been obtained for the arbitrary density matrices [7–10], the analytical formulas for the quantum discord were proposed for X states [11–16]. In an X matrix, nonzero entries may belong only to the main diagonal and anti-diagonal [17–19]. Notice that the sum and product of X matrices are again the X matrix (i.e., a set of X matrices is algebraically closed).
However, it was found later that the formulas [12–15] are incorrect in general. The reason is that the authors [12–15] believed (and this was their error) that optimal measurements are achieved only in the limiting points, i.e., at the angles \(\theta =0\) or \(\pi /2\). But on the explicit examples [20–22] of X density matrices, it was proved that the optimal measurements can take place at the intermediate angles in the interval \((0,\pi /2)\). Unfortunately, these examples with density matrices are specific and do not clarify the general situation.
In the present paper, we show that the domain of intermediate optimal angles can arise in the vicinity of transition from the domain with optimal measurement angle \(\theta =\pi /2\) to the domain with optimal angle \(\theta =0\) (or inversely). The equations for the boundaries between these domains are discussed, and their solutions are investigated for different models. In particular, the boundaries can coincide or be absent at all, and then, the quantum discord is given in the total domain of definition by closed analytical formulas.
In the following sections, the general seven-parameters X density matrix is reduced to the five-parameter form by using local unitary transformations, the existence of intermediate subdomains with the optimal anglers \(\theta \not =0, \pi /2\) is proved, and the equations for boundaries between different subdomains are presented and then applied to various physical systems. Finally, in the last section, a brief conclusion is given.
2 Real nonnegative form for the X density matrices and the domain of definition for their entries
In the most general case, the X density matrix of two-qubit (A and B or 1 and 2) system has seven real parameters. The quantum entanglement and quantum discord are invariant under the local unitary transformations of density matrices [1–5]. Owing to this property, one can with the help of such transformations reduce the seven-parameters density matrix to the real, nonnegative five-parameters X form [22–25]. After this, the X density matrix takes the form
or, to emphasize explicitly that the off-diagonal elements are nonnegative, and we write
Thus, one can now consider the density matrices (1) with restrictions (which follow from the normalization condition and nonnegativity definition of any density operator)
These relations define the domain \(\mathcal{D}\) of X density matrix in the space of its entries.
We can rewrite the density matrix (1) in the equivalent form
where
Decomposition of this matrix on the Pauli matrices \(\sigma _\alpha \) (\(\alpha =x,y,z\)) leads to its Bloch form
The expansion coefficients are the unary and binary correlation functions, and therefore, five parameters of density matrix are expressed through the five different correlators,
It is clear that
The domain of definition, \(\mathcal{D}\), in the space \((s_1, s_2, c_1, c_2, c_3)\) is formed, according to Eqs. (3) and (5), by conditions (see also [21, 26])
The solid \(\mathcal{D}\) is finite and lies in the five-dimensional hypercube (8). Numerical calculations show that the volume of \(\mathcal{D}\) is 8 % of the hypercube one.
The domain \(\mathcal{D}\) is bounded by two quadratic hypersurfaces
and
Rotation by the angle \(\pi /4\) around the \(c_3\) axis transforms these hyperquadrics to the forms
and
where
Thus, the five-dimensional domain \(\mathcal{D}\) results from an intersection of two conic hypercylinders (12) and (13).
3 Three alternatives for the quantum discord
As mentioned above, the measurement operations lie in the ground of discord notion. Following the founders of discord conception [27, 28] and their adherents [11–15], we will only consider here the orthogonal projective measurements, i.e., the von Neumann measurements.Footnote 1 Such measurements can be reduced to the projections which are characterized by the polar (\(\theta \)) and azimuthal (\(\phi \)) angles relative to the z axis [13, 15, 23]. It is important to note that the optimal measurements in the case of real X density matrix with an additional condition \(uv\ge 0\) are achieved by \(\cos 2\phi =1\) [22, 23]. Since the sign of off-diagonal elements are changed by the local unitary transformations, we can always satisfy the above condition.
In the general nonsymmetrical case (\(s_1\ne s_2\) or \(b\ne c\)), quantum discord depends on a subsystem (A or B) where the measurements are performed. For definiteness and without loss of generality, let the measured subsystem be B. (If measured subsystem is A, we simply should replace everywhere \(s_1\rightleftharpoons s_2\) or \(b\rightleftharpoons c\).) Then the quantum discord is given as [3–5]
where \(\rho _B=\mathrm{Tr}_A\rho _{AB}\) is the reduced density matrix and \(S(\rho )=-\mathrm{Tr}\rho \ln \rho \) is the von Neumann entropy for the corresponding state \(\rho \) (Here the entropy is in nats; to transform it, e.g., in bits, one should divide it by \(\ln 2\)). Simple calculations with (1) lead to
\(S(\rho _{AB})=S\), where
The quantum average conditional entropy of subsystem A is given as [22]
where
Thus, \(S_\mathrm{cond}\) depends in fact on four parameters because u and v enter via the combination (22). The conditional entropy \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) is a differentiable function of its argument \(\theta \).
Expressions (16)–(22) allow to define the measurement-dependent discord as [4]
where \(\theta \in [0,\pi /2]\). It is obvious that the absolute minimum of this discord can be either on the bounds (\(\theta =0,\pi /2\)) or at the intermediate point \(\theta \in (0,\pi /2)\). As a result, there is a choice from three possibilities for the quantum discord
This equation generalizes the one proposed earlier for the quantum discord [11–15]
i.e., it was assumed that the optimal observable can be either \(\sigma _z\) or \(\sigma _x\). In Fig. 1, we schematically illustrate the parameter domain of a system with three possible subdomains for the discord.
From Eqs. (16)–(23), we have for the discord branch \(Q_0\equiv Q(0)\):
For \(\theta =\pi /2\), we obtain
Thus, the branches \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) are expressed analytically, and the branch \(Q_\theta =\min \nolimits _{\theta \in (0,\pi /2)} Q(\theta )\), if the intermediate minimum exists, should be found from the numerical solution of one-dimensional minimization problem or from the transcendental equation
In the latter case, we should choose among all solutions the point which corresponds to the global minimum. The first derivative of conditional entropy with respect to \(\theta \) is equal to
with
All three possible variants for the quantum discord (\(Q_0\), \(Q_{\pi /2}\), and \(Q_\theta \)) can really exist in physical systems. In the case when \(a=b\) and \(b=c\) (or \(s_1=s_2=0\)), the conditional entropy minimum is always achieved at one of two bound points [11]. However, this is wrong for the more general X states; global minimum can take place at inner points of the interval \((0,\pi /2)\).
Indeed, following the authors [20], let us consider the state
Using Eqs. (18)–(22), we have computed the function \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) for this state. Its behavior is shown in Fig. 2.
From the figure, we conclude that the conditional entropy minimum is situated in the intermediate region, namely at the angle \(\theta =0.4883\approx 28^\circ \). Two other similar numerical examples of quantum states are given in Ref. [22].
These examples clearly show that the optimal measurement angles can really be in the intermediate region \((0,\pi /2)\), i.e., the optimal observables for quantum discord can be not only the \(\sigma _x\) or \(\sigma _z\), but also their superposition.
For the real X state with constraint \(|u+v|\ge |u-v|\) (i.e., \(uv\ge 0\) or \(\mathrm{sign}u=\mathrm{sign}v\)), the authors [21] have proved a theorem which guarantees that the optimal observable is \(\sigma _z\) if
and \(\sigma _x\) if
The theorem states nothing for the region lying between these bounds. But in the case
the inequalities (34) and (35) lead to absence of the intermediate region [35].
4 Equations for the boundaries
Let us start with a heuristic example. Consider a two-parameter family of X states [21, 36]
or
where \(|\Phi ^+\rangle =(|00\rangle +|11\rangle )/\sqrt{2}\). The given density matrix \(\rho \) represents the generalized Horodecki states [26].
Simple calculation yields \(Q_0=\epsilon \) (in bits). Sufficient conditions (34) and (35) for the \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) subdomains give [21]
and
respectively. But in the region
the above theorem does not say anything.
Let us now find the lines on the plane \((m, \epsilon )\) which are defined by the condition
Then we will study the changes of curves \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) in the neighborhood to those lines.
Using Eqs. (17), (26), and (27), we have numerically solved the transcendental equation (42). The solution is only one. The results are plotted in Fig. 3 by dotted line.
Consider in detail a particular case. Let the \(\epsilon \) is held fixed and equal, for example, to \(\epsilon =0.228\) (see Fig. 3). Then the equality \(Q_0=Q_{\pi /2}\) is satisfied at the crossing point \(m_\times =0.101\,234\). Study now the behavior of \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) when the parameter m varies. Inequalities (39) and (40) guarantee that when \(m<0.096\,545\), the discord equals \(Q=Q_{\pi /2}\) and \(Q=Q_0\) when \(m>0.180\,107\). If \(m=0.1015\), the minimum of \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) is at \(\theta =0\) (see Fig. 4a). Moreover, the angle \(\theta =0\) is optimal for all larger values of m. When the m decreases, the minimum on the curve \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) inside the interval between 0 and \(\pi /2\) appears. The minimum is clearly seen when \(m=0.1014\) (Fig. 4b). Near the point \(m=0.101\,234\), the minimum achieves large depth. By further decreasing m, the minimum moves to the bound \(\theta =\pi /2\), and then, it disappears at all. Optimal measurements undergo to the angle \(\theta =\pi /2\).
We argue now that both lower and upper boundaries of the interval where the optimal angles lie between 0 and \(\pi /2\) are exact, i.e., the intermediate minimum of \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) suddenly appears and suddenly disappears. Above all, we note that the first derivative of function \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) at \(\theta =0\) and \(\pi /2\) equals zero in general case: \(S^{\prime }_\mathrm{cond}(0)\equiv S^{\prime }_\mathrm{cond}(\pi /2)\equiv 0\). This is easy to check by direct calculations using Eqs. (29)–(32). Let us turn now again to the Fig. 4. By fixed value of parameter \(\epsilon \) and for each value of m, one can say at any moment the inside minimum exists or it is absent. For instance, when \(m=0.1015\) (\(\epsilon =0.228\)), the function \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) is concave at the point \(\theta =0\) and therefore its second derivative \(S^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{cond}(0)>0\). But when \(m=0.1014\), the conditional entropy has a local maximum at the same bound point \(\theta =0\) and therefore \(S^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{cond}(0)<0\). Hence, the bifurcation point (in the sense that two extrema arise from one) [37] is determined by the condition
Similarly, we have for the other bound point \(\theta =\pi /2\),
Using Eqs. (18)–(21), we get the second derivatives at limiting points:
and
where
and w is given by Eq. (22). The relations (43)–(47) are the boundary equations for the crossover zone \(Q_\theta \). Thus, the boundaries consist of bifurcation points. Notice that the equations for the boundaries between three different phases of quantum discord have been obtained for the first time by the author [24, 25] and later by Maldonado-Trapp et al. [38].
If the solutions of Eqs. (43) and (44) are the same, the intermediate subdomain \(Q_\theta \) is absent and the quantum discord is given by analytical expressions. On the other hand, instead of rough conditions (34) and (35), the inequalities \(S^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{cond}(0)\le 0\) and \( S^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{cond}(\pi /2)\le 0\) define now the complete subdomains \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\), respectively.
Numerical solution of Eqs. (43)–(47) for the state (37) shows that the boundaries are the lines going approximately parallel to the dotted lines (see the lines 1 and 2 in Fig. 3). As a result, the subdomain appears within which the optimal angles should be found numerically. Out of this subdomain, we have analytical expressions for the quantum discord. By \(\epsilon =0.228\), the value for m of \(\pi /2\)-boundary equals \(m_{\pi /2}=0.100\,997\), and for the 0-boundary, it is \(m_0=0.101\,474\). The middle of this interval equals 0.101 236 which is near the point \(m_\times =0.101\,234\).
Consider the discord behavior by a transition from the subdomain \(Q_{\pi /2}\) to \(Q_0\) one (Fig. 5). One can see that down to crossing point \(m_\times =0.101\,234\), the discord \({\tilde{Q}}\), according to Refs. [12–14], equals \(Q_{\pi /2}\), and above the point \(m_\times \), it equals \(Q_0\) (see Fig. 5). If this was valid, the discord \({\tilde{Q}}=\min \{Q_{\pi /2},Q_0\}\) would not be differentiable at the intersection point \(m_\times \). However, in fact, the true discord \(Q=\min \{Q_{\pi /2},Q_\theta ,Q_0\}\) is smooth. This follows from the numerical solution of the task in the intermediate domain. The results are shown again in Fig. 5 by solid line. It is clearly seen that smoothness occurs. We may say that, instead a fracture at \(m_\times \), two hidden transitions occur at the \(\pi /2\)- and 0-boundaries.
Notice that the conditions (39) and (40) are rough too and lead to the bounds which lie far beyond the region of Fig. 3.
5 Bell-diagonal states
The case \(a=d\) and \(b=c\) or \(s_1=s_2=0\) corresponds to the Bell-diagonal states. Domain of definition for the physical states, \(\mathcal{D}\), lies now in the three-dimensional cube defined by \(c_1, c_2, c_3\in [-1,1]\). Two second-order hypersurfaces (10) and (11) are transformed to the two first-order surfaces
and
The former consists of two semi-planes with a \(\wedge \)-shaped cross section, and the latter is similar to it but has a \(\vee \)-shaped cross section. The angle between semi-planes equals \(\arccos (1/3)\approx 78^\circ \). These semi-plane surfaces put bounds to the domain \(\mathcal{D}\) that is reduced, as shown in Fig. 6, to a tetrahedron with vertices [39]
these vertices lie in octants II \((-,+,+)\), IV \((+,-,+)\), V \((+,+,-)\), and VII \((-,-,-)\), respectively. The centers of tetrahedron facets are
Tetrahedron volume equals a third (i.e., about 33.3 %) of the cube one. Notice that the tetrahedron vertices are the states with maximal value of discord (which equals one in bit units).
It is known [40] that the states with zero discord are negligible in the whole Hilbert space. In particular, it has been proved [41, 42] that, when \(s_1=s_2=0\), the zero-discord states have at most one nonzero component of vector \((c_1,c_2,c_3)\), i.e., all classical-only correlated states lie on the Cartesian axes \(Oc_1, Oc_2\) or \(Oc_3\). (This corresponds to the so-called “Ising spins” introduced as a matter of fact by his adviser W. Lenz in 1920 [43, 44].)
In the case of Bell-diagonal states, both boundary equations (43)–(47) are reduced to a relation
so that
Thus, the \(\pi /2\)- and 0-boundaries are coincident, the \(Q_\theta \) subdomain is absent here, and the quantum discord is given by the explicit analytical formula \(Q=\min \{Q_0,Q_{\pi /2}\}\) which is in full agreement with Luo’s results [11].
From Eq. (53), four equations follow
These planes divide the tetrahedron into subdomains \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\), where the quantum discord takes the values \(Q_0\) or \(Q_{\pi /2}\). \(Q_0\) subdomain consists of two hexahedrons \((O,v_1,v_2,o_1,o_2)\) and \((O,v_3,v_4,o_3,o_4)\); they are shown in Fig. 6. The remaining volume of a tetrahedron belongs to the \(Q_{\pi /2}\) states. It is in two times larger than the volume of \(Q_0\) states.
The behavior of quantum discord for the Bell-diagonal states along different trajectories is illustrated in Fig. 7 by solid lines. Figure 7a shows the discord as a function of \(c_3\in [-0.95, 0.45]\) by fixed values of \(c_1=0.3\) and \(c_2=0.25\). The curve is continuous but has the fractures at \(c_3=\pm 0.3\). They happen when the trajectory crosses the planes dividing the \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) subdomains (see Fig. 6). In this case, the optimal measurement angle \(\theta \) varies discontinuously; namely, it jumps from \(\theta =0\) to \(\theta =\pi /2\) or inversely. In the vicinity of cross points, the conditional entropy \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) changes its form going through a straight line (where any angle \(\theta \in [0,\pi /2]\) is optimal). Such a regime of conditional entropy behavior is shown in Fig. 8.
Figure 7b shows the behavior of branches \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) as functions of \(c_2\) by fixed values of other two parameters, \(c_1=0.25\) and \(c_3=0\). Since here \(Q_{\pi /2}<Q_0\), the quantum discord Q equals \(Q_{\pi /2}\). The curve \(Q_{\pi /2}\) has two fractures. This means that the branch \(Q_{\pi /2}\) is a piecewise analytic function. In this case, however, the optimal measurement angle does not change its value \(\theta =\pi /2\), and therefore, the position of conditional entropy minimum remains immutable.
6 Physical systems with the \(Q_\theta \) subdomains
We are interested now in the systems with \(Q_\theta \) phases. As it was seen from the previous section, such regions do not exist in the Bell-diagonal states. Therefore, in this section, we will consider the systems with nonzero values of \(s_1, s_2\).
6.1 Phase flip channels
Let us consider the dynamics of quantum discord under decoherence (for a recent review, see, e.g, [45] and references therein). The authors [14] have considered such a dynamics in the phase flip channel.
The problem is to calculate the quantum discord for the X matrix
Here, the parametrized time \(p=1-\exp (-\gamma t)\), where t is the time and \(\gamma \) is the phase damping rate. The authors [14] restricted themselves to the case where
Expansion coefficients in Eq. (55) are related to the corresponding X matrix elements as
Owing to the relation \(s_2=c_3s_1\), the matrix elements a, b, c, and d satisfy the condition (36), and hence, the \(Q_\theta \) domain is absent here; conditional entropy behaves similar to that as shown in Fig. 8. Thus, nonzero values of \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are the necessary but not sufficient condition for existence of \(Q_\theta \) phase.
Consider a different initial state. For example, let us take \(s_1=s_2=0.65, c_1=c_2=0.249\), and \(c_3=0.5\). As can see from Fig. 9, the curves \(Q_0(p)\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}(p)\) cross at \(p_\times \simeq 0.3158\). An additional study shows that the transition \(Q_{\pi /2}\rightarrow Q_0\) goes through the appearance of single minimum on the \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) curves inside the interval between 0 and \(\pi /2\) (similarly to the curves on Fig. 4).
Solution of equations for the boundaries, Eqs. (43)–(47), shows that the \(\pi /2\)- and 0-boundaries do not coincide now, and therefore, the \(Q_\theta \) region exists here (see Fig. 10).
6.2 Thermal discord
We now discuss systems at the thermal equilibrium. Discord in such systems is important for applications to various magnetic materials [4, 5]. Let us consider the XYZ spin Hamiltonian
This Hamiltonian contains five independent parameters \(J_x,J_y,J_z,B_1,B_2\in (-\infty ,\infty )\) (i.e., in \(\mathcal{R}^5\)) and is the most general real symmetric traceless X matrix. The corresponding Gibbs density matrix is given as
(here \(\beta =1/T\), T is the temperature in energy units, Z is the partition function) and has also the five-parameter real X structure. Thus, the map \(( B_1/T, B_2/T, J_x/T, J_y/T, J_z/T)\leftrightarrow (s_1, s_2, c_1, c_2, c_3)\) (that is \(\mathcal{R}^5\leftrightarrow \mathcal{D}\)) allows in general to change the density matrix language on a picture of interactions in the XYZ dimer in inhomogeneous fields \(B_1\) and \(B_2\).
Having solved eigenproblem for the Hamiltonian (58), we then find expressions for the thermal density matrix elements (see also, e.g., [46])
where
For the correlations functions (5), we have, respectively,
where the partition function equals
and \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) are given again by Eq. (61).
For each choice of interaction constants \(J_x, J_y, J_z\) and external fields \(B_1\) and \(B_2\), we will find the points where the condition \(Q_0=Q_{\pi /2}\) is satisfied. After this, we will again study the changes of curves \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) in the neighborhood of points found.
Taking, for example, a dimer with parameters \(J_x=J_y=J=1, J_z=1.02\), and \(B_1=B_2=B=1\) (that is the XXZ dimer in an uniform field), we consider the thermal discord behavior by a transition from the subdomain \(Q_{\pi /2}\) to \(Q_0\) one (Fig. 11). From the figure, one can see that down to the crossing point \(T_\times =0.81296\), the discord \({\tilde{Q}}\), according to Refs. [12–14], equals \(Q_{\pi /2}\), and above the point \(T_\times \), it equals \(Q_0\). If this was valid, the discord \({\tilde{Q}}=\min \{Q_0,Q_{\pi /2}\}\) would have a fracture at the intersection point \(T_\times \). However, in fact, the true discord Q is a smooth function (at least, it is a function of differentiability class \(C^1\)). This follows from the numerical solution of the task in the intermediate domain, where the \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) curves change similar as in Fig. 4. Results for the quantum discord are shown again in Fig. 11. At the bifurcations points \(T_{\pi /2}=0.76106\) and \(T_0=0.85361\), the higher derivatives of quantum discord \(Q=\min \{Q_{\pi /2},Q_\theta ,Q_0\}\) exhibit a discontinuous behavior.
6.3 Heteronuclear systems with dipolar coupling
Let us consider the system (58) with parameters \(J_x=J_y=-D\) and \(J_z=2D\). Such a model corresponds to a dipolar coupled dimer which is stretched along the z axis [47]
Here the dipolar coupling constant (in frequency units) equals
where \(\mu _0\) is the magnetic permeability of free space, \(\gamma _1\) and \(\gamma _2\) are the gyromagnetic ratios of particles in the dimer, and \(r_0\) is the distance between those particles. Normalized fields \(B_1\) and \(B_2\) in Eq. (65) are
where \(B_0\) is the external magnetic field induction.
We have performed necessary calculations (according to our approach developed in the previous sections) and found the subdomains of quantum discord in the plane \((B_1/D,B_2/D)\). The results are shown at the normalized temperature \(T/D=1\) in Fig. 12. From this figure, one can see that such a system has the \(Q_\theta \) regions between the 1, 2 and \(1^\prime ,2^\prime \) lines. Notice that the phase diagram (Fig. 12) is not symmetric with respect to the bisection line \(B_1/D=B_2/D\) because the quantum discord is not symmetric under the exchange of the subsystems. The \(Q_\theta \) regions can be reached by varying the external magnetic field \( B_0\). Two possible trajectories are shown in Fig. 12 by dotted lines, \(B_2=4B_1\) and \(B_2=B_1/4\). (The value \(\gamma _2/\gamma _1=4\) approximately corresponds to the quotient of gyromagnetic ratios for the nucleus of \(^1\!\)H and \(^{13}\)C.)
We found also that in the \(Q_\theta \) subdomain, the conditional entropy \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) has only one minimum that is located in the interval \((0,\pi /2)\). The picture is qualitatively similar to that is shown in Fig. 4.
So, the \(Q_\theta \) region and corresponding sudden changes of quantum correlation behavior at their boundaries can be observed in solid materials with nuclear dimers.
7 Results and perspectives
In the light of the above, the calculation of quantum discord of any X states can be achieved by following steps. First, the density matrix is transformed to a real form. Second, it is also well to solve the equation \(Q_0=Q_{\pi /2}\), determine possible crossing points of branches \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\), and study the behavior of \(S_\mathrm{cond}(\theta )\) near the crossing points found. Then the equations \(S_\mathrm{cond}^{\prime \prime }(0)=0\) and \(S_\mathrm{cond}^{\prime \prime }(\pi /2)=0\) are solved to find the boundaries for the intermediate subdomain \(Q_{\theta }\). After this, one should numerically find the optimal measurement angle \(\theta \in (0,\pi /2)\) and compute \(Q_{\theta }=Q(\theta )\). As a result, the quantum discord is given by \(Q=\min \{Q_0, Q_\theta , Q_{\pi /2}\}\).
So, the quantum discord of X states is represented analytically if the \(Q_\theta \) region is absent. Then the quantum discord is given by the closed form \(Q=\min \{Q_{\pi /2},Q_0\}\) and by \(Q=Q_{\pi /2}=Q_0\) in the fully isotropic case [48]. The discord is continuous, but generally speaking it is a piecewise smooth function. In particular, this is valid for a special class of X states, namely for the Bell-diagonal states. For them, we found the \(Q_0\) and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) regions in the total domain of their definition (Fig. 6). It would be interesting to find the subdomains \(Q_0\), \(Q_\theta \), and \(Q_{\pi /2}\) in the five-dimensional domain \(\mathcal{D}\) making, e.g., an atlas of maps.
Also, we have shown in this paper that the boundaries for the transition subdomain from \(Q_0\) to \(Q_{\pi /2}\) or reversely are exactly defined. They consist of nonanalyticity points which are bifurcation ones. The boundaries may coincide, and then, the quantum discord is evaluated analytically in the total domain of definition. The regions \(Q_\theta \) with the optimal intermediate angles \(\theta \in (0,\pi /2)\) have been found for a number of physical systems including the phase flip channels, spin dimers at the thermal equilibrium, and heteronuclear systems with dipolar interaction. The transitions \(Q_{\pi /2}\leftrightarrow Q_\theta \leftrightarrow Q_0\) occur continuously and smoothly. This is a new type of transitions for the quantum discord.
The examples considered show that \(Q_\theta \) phases are interesting physical phenomena rather not a mathematical exotic.
We have found only two regimes for the average conditional entropy change by above transitions: (i) via the birth of one intermediate minimum (as shown in Fig. 4) and (ii) via the straight line (as shown in Fig. 8), when arbitrary angle \(\theta \in [0,\pi /2]\) is optimal, but any infinitesimal perturbations of model parameters lead to a jump of optimal measurement angle to zero or \(\pi /2\). It is hoped that our observations will be rigorously proofed and, maybe, generalized in the future.
At present, the attempts are made to obtain analytical formulas for the super quantum discord of X states with nonzero Bloch vectors [49, 50]. In this connection, one should note that the authors do not take into account a possibility of intermediate optimal angles for the weak measurements which are a generalization of ordinary projective ones.
References
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., Vedral, V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
Céleri, L.C., Maziero, J., Serra, R.M.: Theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum discord and related measures. Int. J. Quant. Inf. 11, 1837 (2011)
Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., Vedral, V.: The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: discord and related measures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012)
Aldoshin, S.M., Fel’dman, E.B., Yurishchev, M.A.: Quantum entanglement and quantum discord in magnetoactive materials (Review Article). Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 40, 5 (2014) (in Russian). Low Temp. Phys. 40, 3 (2014)
Huang, Y.: Computing quantum discord is NP-complete. New J. Phys. 16, 033027 (2014)
Hill, S., Wootters, W.K.: Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997)
Wootters, W.K.: Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)
Verstraete, F., Dehaene, J., De Moor, B.: Local filtering operations on two qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 010101(R) (2001)
Audenaert, K., Verstraete, F., De Moor, B.: Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052304 (2001)
Luo, S.: Quantum discord for two-qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042303 (2008)
Ali, M., Rau, A.R.P., Alber, G.: Quantum discord for two-qubit \(X\) states. Phys. Rev. A 81, 042105 (2010); Erratum in: Phys. Rev. A 82, 069902(E) (2010)
Fanchini, F.F., Werlang, T., Brasil, C.A., Arruda, L.G.E., Caldeira, A.O.: Non-Markovian dynamics of quantum discord. Phys. Rev. A 81, 052107 (2010)
Li, B., Wang, Z.-X., Fei, S.-M.: Quantum discord and geometry for a class of two-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 83, 022321 (2011)
Ding, B.-F., Wang, X.-Y., Zhao, H.-P.: Quantum and classical correlations for a two-qubit \(X\) structure density matrix. Chin. Phys. B 20, 100302 (2011)
Vinjanampathy, S., Rau, A.R.P.: Quantum discord for qubit-qudit systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 095303 (2012)
Yu, T., Eberly, T.H.: Evolution from entanglement to decoherence of bipartite mixed “X” states. Quant. Inf. Comput 7, 459 (2007)
Rau, A.R.P.: Algebraic characterization of \(X\)-states in quantum information. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 412002 (2009)
Mendonca, P.E.M.F., Marchiolli, M.A., Galetti, D.: Entanglement universality of two-qubit X-states. Ann. Phys. 351, 79 (2014)
Lu, X.-M., Ma, J., Xi, Z., Wang, X.: Optimal measurements to access classical correlations of two-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 83, 012327 (2011)
Chen, Q., Zhang, C., Yu, S., Yi, X.X., Oh, C.H.: Quantum discord of two-qubit \(X\) states. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042313 (2011)
Huang, Y.: Quantum discord for two-qubit \(X\) states: analytical formula with very small worst-case error. Phys. Rev. A 88, 014302 (2013)
Ciliberti, L., Rossignoli, R., Canosa, N.: Quantum discord in finite \(XY\) chains. Phys. Rev. A 82, 042316 (2010)
Yurischev, M.A.: Quantum discord for general X and CS states: a piecewise-analytic-numerical formula. arXiv:1404.5735v1 [quant-ph]
Yurishchev, M.A.: NMR dynamics of quantum discord for spin-carrying gas molecules in a closed nanopore. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 119, 828 (2014)
Kim, H., Hwang, M.-R., Jung, E., Park, D.K.: Difficulties in analytic computation for relative entropy of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 81, 052325 (2010)
Ollivier, H., Zurek, W.H.: Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001)
Zurek, W.H.: Quantum discord and Maxwell’s demons. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012320 (2003)
Hamieh, S., Kobes, V., Zaraket, H.: Positive-operator-valued measure optimization of classical correlations. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052325 (2004)
Datta, A.: Studies on the role of entanglement in mixed-state quantum computation. Dissertation. The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (2008). arXiv:0807.4490v1 [quant-ph]
Girolami, D., Adesso, G.: Quantum discord for general two-qubit states: analytical progress. Phys. Rev. A 83, 052108 (2011)
Calve, F., Giorgi, G.L., Zambrini, R.: Orthogonal measurements are almost sufficient for quantum discord of two qubits. EPL 96, 40005 (2011)
Shi, M., Sun, C., Jiang, F., Yan, X., Du, J.: Optimal measurement for quantum discord of two-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 85, 064104 (2012)
Namkung, M., Chang, J., Shin, J., Kwon, Y.: Revisiting quantum discord for two-qubit X states: error bound to analytical formula. arXiv:1404.6329v1 [quant-ph]
Pinto, J.P.G., Karpat, G., Fanchini, F.F.: Sudden change of quantum discord for a system of two qubits. Phys. Rev. A 88, 034304 (2013)
Galve, F., Giorgi, G.L., Zambrini, R.: Maximally discordant mixed states of two qubits. Phys. Rev. A 83, 012102 (2011)
Arnold, V.I.: Catastrophe theory. Springer, Berlin (1992). sec. 10
Maldonado-Trapp, A., Hu, A., Roa, L.: Analytical solutions and criteria for the quantum discord of two-qubit X-state. Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 1947–1958 (2015)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, M.: Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1838 (1996)
Ferraro, A., Aolita, L., Cavalcanti, D., Cucchietti, F.M.: Acín A.: Almost all quantum states have nonclassical correlations. Phys. Rev. A 81, 052318 (2010)
Dakić, B., Vedral, V., Brukner, C̆.: Necessary and sufficient condition for nonzero quantum discord. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190502 (2010)
Lang, M.D., Caves, C.M.: Quantum discord and the geometry of Bell-diagonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150501 (2010)
Lenz, W.: Beitrag zum Verständnis der magnetischen Erscheinungen in festen Körpern. Phys. Z. 21, 613 (1920)
Brush, S.G.: History of the Lenz-Ising model. Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 883 (1967)
Aaronson, B., Lo Franco, R., Adesso, G.: Comparative investigation of the freezing phenomena for quantum correlations under nondissipative decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 88, 012120 (2013)
Yang, G.H., Gao, W.B., Zhou, L., Song, H.S.: The entanglement in anisotropic Heisenberg XYZ chain with inhomogeneous magnetic field. arXiv:quant-ph/0602051v3
Kuznetsova, E.I., Yurischev, M.A.: Quantum discord in spin systems with dipole-dipole interaction. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 3587 (2013)
Yurishchev, M.A.: Quantum discord in spin-cluster materials. Phys. Rev. B 84, 024418 (2011)
Eftekhari, H., Faizi, E.: Super quantum discord for a class of two-qubit states with weak measurement. arXiv:1409.4329v1 [quant-ph]
Li, T., Ma, T., Wang, Y., Fei, S., Wang, Z.: Super quantum discord for X-type states. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 680 (2015)
Acknowledgments
The author thanks A. I. Zenchuk for valuable remarks. The research was supported by the RFBR Grants (Nos. 13-03-00017 and 15-07-07928) and by the Program No. 8 of the Presidium of RAS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yurischev, M.A. On the quantum discord of general X states. Quantum Inf Process 14, 3399–3421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-1046-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-1046-5