Abstract
Photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP) has been observed in the homodimeric, type-1 photochemical reaction centers (RCs) of the acidobacterium, Chloracidobacterium (Cab.) thermophilum, by 15N magic-angle spinning (MAS) solid-state NMR under continuous white-light illumination. Three light-induced emissive (negative) signals are detected. In the RCs of Cab. thermophilum, three types of (bacterio)chlorophylls have previously been identified: bacteriochlorophyll a (BChl a), chlorophyll a (Chl a), and Zn-bacteriochlorophyll a′ (Zn-BChl a′) (Tsukatani et al. in J Biol Chem 287:5720–5732, 2012). Based upon experimental and quantum chemical 15N NMR data, we assign the observed signals to a Chl a cofactor. We exclude Zn-BChl because of its measured spectroscopic properties. We conclude that Chl a is the primary electron acceptor, which implies that the primary donor is most likely Zn-BChl a′. Chl a and 81-OH Chl a have been shown to be the primary electron acceptors in green sulfur bacteria and heliobacteria, respectively, and thus a Chl a molecule serves this role in all known homodimeric type-1 RCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chloracidobacterium (Cab.) thermophilum was discovered in 2007 in microbial mats of hot springs in Yellowstone National Park, WY, USA (Bryant et al. 2007). It is the first chlorophototrophic species in the phylum of Acidobacteria, and at the time of its discovery, it extended the number of phyla containing chlorophototrophic bacteria to six. Recently, a phototrophic species named Gemmatimonas phototrophica strain AP64T from a seventh bacterial phylum (Gemmatimonadetes) has been described (Zeng et al. 2014). Cab. thermophilum and “Ca. Thermochlorobacter aerophilum” are the only known aerobic chlorophototrophs that have type-1 homodimeric reaction centers (RC) (Bryant and Frigaard 2006; Liu et al. 2012; Tsukatani et al. 2012; Tank and Bryant 2015a, b; Tank et al. 2017). RCs are able to convert light energy into chemical energy and are, therefore, the key to the photochemical process of chlorophyll-based phototrophy (i.e., chlorophototrophy) (Tsukatani et al. 2012). There are two groups of photosynthetic RCs: type-1 RCs that utilize iron–sulfur clusters as terminal electron acceptor, and type-2 RCs that contain quinone molecules for this purpose (Golbeck 2003). Photosystem I of cyanobacteria and higher plants is a heterodimeric, type-1 RC. Homodimeric type-1 RCs are also found in the anaerobic heliobacteria and green sulfur bacteria. Previously, this was explained by the sensitivity of the Fe4–S4 clusters towards oxygen (Overmann 2001; Madigan 2001). However, it was later found that, unless it is illuminated, Chlorobaculum (Cba.) tepidum is tolerant to oxygen, suggesting that reactive oxygen species causes the damage (Li et al. 2009). The RCs of purple bacteria, including aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria and G. phototrophica AP64T, and the filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria contain type-2 RCs. Photosystem II of plants and cyanobacteria are also type-2 RCs (Golbeck 2003; Oh-oka 2007). All type-2 RCs have heterodimeric cores and utilize (bacterio)-pheophytin molecules as the primary electron acceptor.
(Bacterio-)chlorophylls [(B-)Chls] act in various processes in chlorophototrophic bacteria. In addition to the function of light harvesting and the associated transfer of excitation energy, they act as primary electron donor and primary electron acceptor in photosynthetic RCs. Based on a porphyrin structure, Chls and BChls comprise a central atom (usually a Mg2+ ion but sometimes Zn2+) and different substituents at the outer macrocycle carbons. Pheophytins, which do not coordinate to a central atom, act as primary electron acceptors in type-2 RCs. In the RC complex of Cab. thermophilum, reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) revealed the presence of three different Chls: BChl a, Chl a, and Zn-BChl a′ in a ratio of about 12.8:8.0:2.0 (Tsukatani et al. 2012). Zn-BChl a′ was only found in the RC and was not present in chlorosomes, the light-harvesting antenna complexes of this organism, nor in the FMO antenna protein that only contained BChl a (Wen et al. 2011; Tsukatani et al. 2012). Zn-BChl a′ was suggested to function as the primary electron donor (Tsukatani et al. 2012). In the literature, 1H and 13C chemical shifts of Zn-BChl a have been reported (Kobayashi et al. 1998, 2016). In this work, 15N liquid-state NMR data from this cofactor are presented to provide reference values for the 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectra.
The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect (Jeschke and Matysik 2003; Daviso et al. 2008a; Bode et al. 2013; Sosnovsky et al. 2016) provides selective access to information on the electron donor and the primary electron acceptor that form a spin-correlated radical pair. It allows the detection of electron transfer chain cofactors of isolated RCs, and it can be used to detect these cofactors at nanomolar concentrations in intact cells (Prakash et al. 2006; Janssen et al. 2010). The electronic ground-state structures of the electron donor and acceptor forming a spin-correlated radical pair is reflected in the observed chemical shifts. Electron spin densities can be deduced from the photo-CIDNP MAS NMR intensities. There are up to three mechanisms that occur in parallel and that contribute to the solid-state, photo-CIDNP effect: (1) three-spin mixing (TSM), generally yielding emissive signals; (2) differential decay (DD); and (3), if the lifetime of the donor triplet state is sufficiently long, differential relaxation (DR) giving enhanced absorptive signals (Jeschke 1998; McDermott et al. 1998; Polenova and McDermott 1999). Recently, the spin dynamical system has been re-interpreted in terms of level crossings and anti-crossings within an electron–electron–nuclear spin scheme (Sosnovsky et al. 2016).
The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect has already been observed in the RCs of nine species, including plants (Alia et al. 2004; Diller et al. 2005; Roy et al. 2007b; Janssen et al. 2010, 2012), bacteria (Zysmilich and McDermott 1994; Schulten et al. 2002; Prakash et al. 2005, 2006; Diller et al. 2008; Roy et al. 2007a), and Chromista (Zill 2017a). An overview of these species is presented in Fig. 1. In addition, the effect has been observed for the blue-light photoreceptor phototropin LOV1-C57S (Thamarath et al. 2010) from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. There are seven bacterial phyla with chlorophototrophic members (Tank et al. 2017; Thiel et al. 2017). The effect has not yet been observed in the phyla Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Gemmatimonadetes. In the present work, the solid-state photo-CIDNP effect was studied in the membranes of Cab. thermophilum from the phylum Acidobacteria. The fact that the solid-state photo-CIDNP effect has been observed in all taxonomic kingdoms and in a large variety of phyla implies that the effect is an inherent property of natural photosystems (Matysik et al. 2009) and that it probably reflects conserved features of light-induced charge separation in reaction centers with important functional relevance (Céspedes-Camacho and Matysik 2014).
Materials and methods
Medium preparation and growth of 15N-labeled Cab. thermophilum cells
Chloracidobacterium thermophilum was grown in CTM medium (1 L) according to the protocol described in Tank and Bryant (2015a, b). Slight changes in the medium were made to achieve the growth of Cab. thermophilum on 15N-labeled substrates. Bacto peptone and the 20 amino acid mix of the CTM medium were replaced by uniformly 15N-labeled algal amino acid mix NLM-2161 (Cambridge Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA) as the sole nitrogen source. The 15N-labeled amino acid mix (100 mg) was added to the medium prior autoclaving. Cells were incubated at 51–52 °C and were illuminated with a tungsten lamp at ≤ 50 mol photons m−2 s−1 for 7–10 days.
Isolation of chlorosome-depleted total membranes containing reaction centers
15N-labeled cells of Cab. thermophilum were harvested by centrifugation at 7500×g for 20 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline solution (100 mL; PBS = 10 mM potassium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.2). Cell suspensions were aliquoted equally (25 mL each) into 50-mL screw-capped plastic tubes. Lysozyme (3 mg mL−1) was added, and the suspensions were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 25 min. The cell suspensions were kept on ice while the treated cells were disrupted by four passages through a French pressure cell (138 MPa). Cellular components, including membranes, were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 220,000×g for 2 h. This and subsequent ultracentrifugation steps were performed at 4 °C. Each of the four pellets was resuspended in ~ 3 mL of PBS, and the resuspended membranes were subsequently loaded on continuous PBS–sucrose density gradients (10–50%, w/v) and centrifuged at 220,000×g for 18 h to separate the RC-containing membranes from other cell components. The Cab. thermophilum membrane fraction appeared as an orange-colored band underneath a dark green band that contained the remaining BChl c-containing chlorosomes in the PBS–sucrose density gradients (Fig. S1A). The chlorosome band was carefully removed by pipetting prior to collection of the membrane fraction to avoid cross-contamination. The membrane fractions were recovered by pipetting and were pooled in an ultracentrifugation tube. The membrane fraction was diluted with five volumes of PBS to reduce the sucrose concentration of the sample in two subsequent washing steps. The pooled membranes were centrifuged at 250,000×g for 2 h. The supernatants were discarded and the membrane pellets were resuspended in ~ 25 mL PBS and centrifuged again at 220,000×g for 2 h. In a final step the membrane pellet was resuspended in a minimal volume of ~ 1.5 mL PBS isolation buffer. The absorption spectrum of these chlorosome-depleted membranes showed a strong enrichment of the characteristic absorption features of FMO and RCs of Cab. thermophilum, which have a maximum at 809 nm and a shoulder at 823 nm (Fig. S1B). Washed membranes were stored at 4 °C in the dark until they were required for analysis.
For photo-CIDNP MAS NMR experiments, the volume was reduced using Centricon Plus-20 centrifugal filter devices (Amicon®, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, USA, 30 kDa molecular weight cutoff) performing centrifugation for 12 min at 4000×g. Membranes containing RCs were reduced by adding 1 M sodium dithionite solution up to a final concentration of 100 mM in an oxygen-free atmosphere.
MAS NMR measurements
Solid-state NMR measurements were performed with an Avance-III 400-MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a 4-mm MAS probe. The sample was loaded in a 4-mm sapphire rotor and inserted into the MAS probe. Freezing slowly helped to obtain homogeneous sample distribution against the rotor wall (Fischer et al. 1992). The light and dark spectra were collected with a Hahn-echo pulse sequence and two-pulse phase modulation (TPPM) proton decoupling (Bennett et al. 1995). 15N-MAS NMR spectra were obtained at a temperature of 250 K under continuous illumination with white light (1000 W xenon arc lamp) (Matysik et al. 2000). The rotational frequency for MAS was 8 kHz and the cycle delay was 0.5, 4, or 12 s. Artificial line broadening of 40 Hz was applied prior to Fourier transformation. All the 15N-NMR spectra were referenced using the amino NH2 response of histidine ⋅HCl at 49.09 ppm.
Preparation of 15N-labeled Zn-BChl a
Cultures of Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides were grown phototrophically using [15N]-ammonium sulfate (95%) as the sole nitrogen source in anoxic M22+ medium. Zn-BChl a was prepared from Mg-BChl a by slight modification of a previously described method (Chen et al. 2016). Briefly, one volume of extracted 15N-labeled Mg-BChl a in methanol was mixed with excess zinc acetate, 50 mM sodium ascorbate, and six volumes of glacial acetic acid. The mixture was incubated at 90 °C for 1 h. After centrifugation at 10,000×g for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and dried in a vacuum concentrator at 30 °C. The dried pigments were dissolved in methanol and purified by reversed-phase HPLC on an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies) with a semi-preparative Discovery C18 column (10 mm × 25 cm) (Supelco, Sigma-Aldrich) using a modified method (Van Heukelem et al. 1994). Solvents A and B were 80:20 (v/v) methanol–500 mM ammonium acetate and 80:20 (v/v) methanol–acetone, respectively. Pigments were eluted at 3.5 mL min−1 with a linear gradient of 92–93% solvent B over 10 min, increasing to 100% to wash the column. Elution of Zn-BChl a was monitored at 770 nm. Approximately 9 mg of 15N-labeled Mg-BChl a was extracted from the cells of a 200-mL culture of Rba. sphaeroides, and the final yield of 15N-labeled Zn-BChl a was approximately 1 mg. The identity of the compound was established by its absorption spectrum (Fig. 2), which had maxima at 355 and 763 nm (Wakao et al. 1996). Mass spectrometry showed that the purified 15N–Zn-BChl a had m/z of 955.5 (M+) (Fig. S2) compared to Mg-BChl a (calculated mass = 910.6) and 14N–Zn-BChl a (calculated mass = 950.5) (Tsukatani et al. 2012; Kobayashi et al. 2006). As expected, the mass confirmed the replacement of Mg by Zn (+ 39.9) and the substitution of the four 14N pyrrole nitrogens with 15N (+ 4). Furthermore, the purified 15N–Zn–BChl a exhibited the characteristic isotopic abundance pattern for compounds containing Zn (Tsukatani et al. 2012). After the NMR experiments, infrared (Fig. S3) and Raman spectra (Fig. S4) were also obtained.
Solution-state NMR measurements
For the solution-state NMR measurements, 15N–Zn-BChl a (~ 3 mg) was dissolved in d8-tetrahydrofuran (THF-d8). The 1H-NMR spectrum and the 15N–1H-HMQC were measured at 600 MHz using a cryoProbe. The 15N-NMR spectrum and the 13C-APT spectrum were acquired in the same solvent at 500 MHz using a Prodigy-BBO probehead. 1H and 13C spectra were referenced to TMS. 15N spectra were referenced to liquid ammonia using a solution of 90% formamide in DMSO as external standard.
Quantum chemical calculations of 15N-chemical shifts
The Zn-BChl a geometry was optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory (Becke 1993; Rassolov et al. 2001), including the Grimme’s dispersion correction (Grimme et al. 2011) and the SMD implicit solvent model (Marenich et al. 2009) with THF as the solvent. In order to reduce complexity, the phytyl tail was replaced with a methyl group. In addition, we have added an explicit THF molecule to saturate the axial coordination of zinc. There are two options for THF ligation, called “α” and “β” as shown in Fig. 3. In the case of α ligation, the THF molecule and the C-171 atom are on opposite faces of the tetrapyrrole macrocycle (Fig. 3 top), while for β ligation, the THF molecule is on the same side of the macrocycle as the C-171 atom (Fig. 3 bottom).
The isotropic shielding tensors were calculated using B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory and the gauge-invariant atomic orbitals (GIAO) method (Ruud et al. 1993), and chemical shifts were taken with respect to the isotropic shielding of ammonia 254.97 ppm, which was calculated at the same level of theory. All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 software package (Frisch et al. 2009).
Results and discussion
15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectra from Cab. Thermophilum
Figure 4 shows the 15N-MAS NMR spectra of uniformly 15N-labeled membranes of Cab. thermophilum. All spectra (A–F) were recorded for about 2 days with different cycle delays. Spectra A, C, and E were collected in the dark, and no signal is observed. Due to the relatively low concentration of the sample, no signal from the protein is observed. Spectra B, D, and F were measured under continuous illumination with white light. Spectra A and B were collected with a cycle delay of 12 s (16,300 scans). Spectra C and D were measured with a cycle delay of 4 s (45,000 scans), and a cycle delay of 0.5 s (345,000 scans) was used for spectra E and F. The strongest light-induced signals are observed in spectra B and D. In spectrum F only a signal at 216.0 ppm can be observed. This is due to a too short cycle delay of 0.5 s, which does not allow for sufficient relaxation. Hence, the optimal cycle delay is around 4 s. All signals are light-induced and emissive (negative). In the 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectrum, no splitting of the signals is observed as in the special pair of Rba. sphaeroides (Daviso et al. 2008b). Hence, we can conclude that the observed set of signals occur either from a perfect dimer or a monomeric donor (i.e., in a strongly and functionally asymmetric dimeric donor). To obtain a maximal light-induced signal, a detailed view of the sum of spectra B and D of Fig. 4 is provided in Fig. S5. Upon illumination, three signals emerge in the aromatic region at 250.1, 216.0, and 191.4 ppm. The observation of these three signals implies that the signals occur from only one cofactor, which is either the electron donor or the primary electron acceptor. It would be possible that both donor and acceptor would be of the same type of cofactor; however, one would not expect that they would show perfectly overlapping chemical shifts.
In the RCs of Cab. thermophilum, three types of cofactors have been identified (Chl a, BChl a, and Zn-BChl a′) (Tsukatani et al. 2012). Careful repetition of reversed-phase HPLC and reversed-phase HPLC–MS analysis again revealed only the same three pigments, and no 81-OH Chl a was detected. 15N-chemical shifts of Chl a and Zn-BChl a was prepared to obtain 15N-chemical shifts under solution-state conditions.
Solution-state NMR spectra from Zn-BChl a
Figure S6 shows the 1H15N-HMQC spectrum of Zn-BChl a. Analysis of this spectrum confirmed the assignment of the three protons H-5, H-10, and H-20 of the porphyrin ring (for numbering, see Fig. S7). Each of these protons is coupled via three bonds to an sp3- and an sp2-hybridized N atom. It is a characteristic feature of BChl a and, hence, also Zn-BChl a′, that each pyrrole nitrogen is coupled to a different number of protons. The resonance at 180.1 ppm is coupled to one proton only and must, therefore, be induced from the nitrogen of ring-III. Nitrogen N-I arises at 178.1 ppm which is confirmed by the 3J-coupling to two protons at 9.11 ppm (H-5) and 8.52 ppm (H-20). The signal at 261.5 ppm is coupled to three protons. Hence, these resonances can be assigned to N-IV. In addition, a weak fourth crosspeak occurs due to the 4J-coupling to H-132 at 6.05 ppm. This nitrogen N-II resonates at 259.4 ppm. Table 1 summarizes the experimental 15N assignments. The macrocycle of Zn-BChl a with 55 C-atoms and 74 protons shows overlapping of a number of signals and the assignment of the resonances of the phytyl side chain remains incomplete. The structure is presented in Fig. S7.
An overview on the chemical shifts assigned to the 13C and 1H positions in comparison to literature data is provided in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The assignment in this work is almost identical to the chemical shifts observed in the literature (Kobayashi et al. 1998, 2016). In addition to the known signals, four 13C-resonances and two 1H-resonances have been assigned for the first time. Hence, the signals of Zn-BChl a are assigned completely except for those associated with the phytyl side chain.
Calculation of the 15N-chemical shifts from Zn-BChl a
Figure S8 shows the optimized geometries of Zn-BChl a and Zn-BChl a′ with one THF molecule as the fifth ligand at either the α or β positions. It was found that in the case of Zn-BChl a, the α-ligand is energetically preferable by ~ 4.21 kJ mol−1 (~ 0.0436 eV). However, in the case of Zn-BChl a′, the β-ligand is more stable by ~ 3.15 kJ mol−1 (~ 0.0327 eV). In addition, the two geometries of 81-OH Chl a were calculated (Fig. S9), showing that the S configuration is ~ 3.52 kJ mol−1 (~ 0.0365 eV) more stable than the R configuration.
Table 1 also compiles the theoretically calculated values. Clearly, the trends in the experimental data are well reproduced and Chl a and Zn-BChl a can be readily distinguished. The differences between the values of the four calculated forms of Zn-BChl a are too small to conclude the state of that molecule in THF solution. The calculations of the 15N-chemical shifts of Zn-BChl a and Zn-BChl a′ show that the chemical shift differences between the epimers are nearly identical and differ by only a few ppm. Furthermore, solely on the basis on 15N NMR, it would also be difficult to distinguish Chl a and 81-OH Chl a.
Assignment of the 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR signals from Cab. thermophilum
Having obtained the 15N-chemical shifts from Zn-BChl a, the sets of 15N-chemical shifts are now available for all cofactors associated with the RCs of Cab. thermophilum. Table 1 provides an overview on the photo-CIDNP MAS NMR signals from Cab. thermophilum in comparison to solution-state NMR data for the pure cofactors. Furthermore, 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR data are presented for other RCs of plants (Diller et al. 2007a), bacteria (Thamarath et al. 2012), and Chromista (Zill 2017a), together with the 15N-chemical shift calculations from Zn-BChl a and Zn-BChl a′ as well as from Chl a and 81-OH Chl a determined in this study. On the basis of the chemical shift values obtained by experiments and calculations (summarized in Table 1), we can identify the (B)Chl cofactor that best matches the three 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR signals observed in Cab. thermophilum (Fig. S5).
In the 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectrum of Cab. thermophilum, the strongest signal is observed at 216.0 ppm. In comparison to the three (B)Chls found in Cab. thermophilum, this very characteristic signal matches best to the N-II of Chl a at 206.0 ppm. The resonance at 250.1 ppm can conveniently be assigned to N-IV and the signal at 191.4 ppm corresponds to N-III. Hence, we conclude that the three 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR signals that are observed in membranes of Cab. thermophilum originate from Chl a, although the signals appear slightly disturbed, especially at ring II. A comparison to the signals observed in the other three RCs, however, reveals that the N-II resonance differs by only a few ppm. Hence, the chemical shifts of the three 15N signals reported here match well to those of Chl a incorporated in other RCs.
The question now arises whether Chl a acts as the donor or the acceptor within the spin-correlated radical pair. The RC complex of Cab. thermophilum contains three pigments in the ratio 1.6 Zn-BChl a′, 10.3 Chl a, and 6.4 BChl a molecules per P840 donor. The light-induced optical difference spectrum (P+ minus P) exhibits maximal photobleaching near 840 nm, which indicates that Chl a is certainly not the primary donor for these RCs. There are probably at least two Zn-BChl a′ molecules in the RC, implying that these two molecules could form a dimeric donor in the electron transfer cofactor chain. All known type-1 RCs have at least one epimer form of (B)Chl as the electron donor. For example, heliobacterial RCs contain two BChl g’ molecules as the symmetric dimeric donor, and these RCs further contain two BChl g’ molecules within the core antenna portion of the RC (Gisriel et al. 2017). These observations strongly suggest that Zn-BChl a′ acts as the electron donor in Cab. thermophilum. This implies that the observed Chl a portion of the spin-correlated radical pair acts as the electron acceptor. The spin-correlated radical pair would therefore be formed by Zn-BChl a′ as the donor and Chl a as the acceptor. The occurrence of a single set of signals from the acceptor can be interpreted to indicate that either only one branch of cofactors is active, or that both branches are active and contain identical acceptor cofactors. Because the RC is a homodimer of PscA subunits (Tsukatani et al. 2012), the results are consistent with the latter option of a symmetric dimer. The absence of signals from the donor in this photo-CIDNP MAS NMR experiment might be an experimental accident because of the field strength chosen. It might be that the positive (enhanced absorptive) contributions by the DD and DR mechanisms cancel the negative (emissive) contributions by the TSM mechanism.
A comparison of the 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectrum of Chl a to those of other species reveals a high similarity to PS I from plants (Diller et al. 2007a) and diatoms (Zill 2017a). Cba. tepidum from the phylum Chlorobi also utilizes Chl a as electron acceptor (Roy et al. 2007a). Furthermore, in the RCs of heliobacteria, 81-OH Chl a acts as primary electron acceptor (Thamarath et al. 2012; Gisriel et al. 2017). The type-1 RCs from H. mobilis only showed signals induced by the donor for the anaerobic Braunstoff preparation and predominantly resonances from the acceptor in case of the aerobic Grünstoff (Thamarath et al. 2012). Comparison of 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectra from Cab. thermophilum and the aerobic RCs from H. mobilis also reveals good matching. As we have seen above, 15N NMR is unable to distinguish Chl a and 81-OH Chl a, in the present case; however, only because Chl a is present and 81-OH Chl a can be excluded biochemically, we conclude that the primary acceptor must be Chl a.
All 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR signals (Figs. 4 and S5) appear with emissive sign, which can be explained by a predominance of the TSM over the DD mechanism. The DR mechanism does not contribute to signals from the acceptor. The lineshape of the observed signals is Lorentzian, indicating that the natural lineshape remains undisturbed. The strongest signal at 216.0 ppm is slightly broader (full width half maximum = FWHM of 70 Hz) than the signal at 250.1 ppm (FWHM of 48 Hz). The narrow linewidth is typical for photosynthetic RCs and is explained by a rigid inner part of the RC (Fischer et al. 1992; Diller et al. 2007a).
Figure 5 shows the photo-CIDNP intensity pattern of Chl a, which acts most likely as the primary electron acceptor in Cab. thermophilum. The depicted signal intensities correlate to the local electron spin densities at this position (Diller et al. 2007b). As in plant PS I (Diller et al. 2007a) and Grünstoff of heliobacteria (Thamarath et al. 2012), N-II shows the highest intensity.
Conclusions
The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect is observed in the membranes of Cab. thermophilum by 15N-MAS NMR. This is the first time that the effect has been found in RCs of an organism from the phylum Acidobacteria. The high number of species as well as the large variety of taxonomic ranks indicates that the effect is an intrinsic property of all photosynthetic species and their RCs. Hence, photosynthetic functionalities appear to be exceptionally constant on very long evolutionary timescales. The results suggest that details concerning the mechanism of primary charge separation are conserved in all types of RCs, which may indicate that primary charge separation in RCs occurs by a single, physically similar process in all RCs. This finding is in general agreement with the widely accepted idea that photochemical reaction centers evolved once and subsequently diversified by processes including gene duplication, divergence, and horizontal gene transfer (e.g., see recent reviews by Cardona 2015; Fischer et al. 2016; Martin et al. 2018).
A set of three 15N NMR signals is observed in the photo-CIDNP MAS NMR spectrum of the type-1 homodimeric RCs of Cab. thermophilum. To identify the cofactor observed with photo-CIDNP MAS NMR, 15N-chemical shifts of Zn-BChl a were determined from solution-state NMR experiments as well as from calculations. The chemical shifts of Zn-BChl a as well as values of Mg-BChl a known from literature do not match the resonances observed with 15N-photo-CIDNP MAS NMR. The photo-CIDNP signals, however, match well to the chemical shifts of Chl a. We conclude that Chl a acts as primary electron acceptor, implying that Zn-BChl a′ is the electron donor in these RCs. The absence of signal splitting is consistent with the observed acceptor cofactor being a part of a symmetrical electron transport chain in this homodimeric RC.
References
Alia A, Roy E, Gast P et al (2004) Photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization in photosystem I of plants observed by 13C magic-angle spinning NMR. J Am Chem Soc 126:12819–12826. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja048051+
Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
Bennett AE, Rienstra CM, Auger M et al (1995) Heteronuclear decoupling in rotating solids. J Chem Phys 103:6951–6958. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470372
Bode B, Thamarath SS, Sai Sankar Gupta KB, Alia A, Jeschke G, Matysik J (2013) The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect and its analytical application. In: Kuhn L (ed) Hyperpolarization methods in NMR spectroscopy. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–121
Boxer SG, Closs GL, Katz JJ (1974) The effect of magnesium coordination on the 13C and 15N magnetic resonance spectra of chlorophyll a. Energies of nitrogen nπ* states as deduced from a the relative complete assignment of chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 96:7058–7066. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00829a038
Bryant DA, Frigaard NU (2006) Prokaryotic photosynthesis and phototrophy illuminated. Trends Microbiol 14:488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.09.001
Bryant DA, Garcia Costas AM, Maresca JA et al (2007) Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum: an aerobic phototrophic acidobacterium. Science 317:523–526. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143236
Cardona T (2015) A fresh look at the evolution and diversification of photochemical reaction centers. Photosynth Res 126:111–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-014-0065-x
Cavalier-Smith T (1998) A revised six-kingdom system of life. Biol Rev 73:203–266
Céspedes-Camacho IF, Matysik J (2014) Spin in photosynthetic electron transport. In: Golbeck J, van der Est A (eds) The biophysics of photosynthesis. Springer, New York, pp 141–170
Chen GE, Canniffe DP, Martin EC, Hunter CN (2016) Absence of the cbb 3 terminal oxidase reveals an active oxygen-dependent cyclase involved in bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol 198:2056–2063. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00121-16
Daviso E, Jeschke G, Matysik J (2008a) Photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP) magic-angle spinning NMR. In: Aartsma TJ, Matysik J (eds) Biophysical techniques in photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 385–399
Daviso E, Gupta KBSS, Prakash S et al (2008b) 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR on RCs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides WT and R26. In: Allen JF, Gantt E, Golbeck JH, Osmond B (eds) Energy from the sun. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 25–28
Diller A, Alia A, Roy E et al (2005) Photo-CIDNP solid-state NMR on photosystems I and II: what makes P680 special? Photosynth Res 84:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-005-0411-0
Diller A, Roy E, Gast P et al (2007a) 15N photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization magic-angle spinning NMR analysis of the electron donor of photosystem II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12767–12771. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701763104
Diller A, Prakash S, Alia A, Gast P, Matysik J, Jeschke G (2007b) Signals in solid-state photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization recover faster than with the longitudinal relaxation time. J Phys Chem B 111:10606–10614. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp072428r
Diller A, Alia A, Gast P et al (2008) 13C photo-CIDNP MAS NMR on the LH1-RC complex of Rhodopseudomonas acidophilia. In: Allen JF, Gantt E, Golbeck JH, Osmond B (eds) Energy from the sun. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 55–58
Egorova-Zachernyuk T, van Rossum B, Erkelens C, de Groot H (2008) Characterisation of uniformly 13C, 15N labelled bacteriochlorophyll a and bacteriopheophytin a in solution and in solid state: complete assignment of the 13C, 1H and 15N chemical shifts. Magn Res Chem 46:1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/mr3c.2295
Fischer MR, de Groot HJM, Raap J et al (1992) 13C Magic angle spinning NMR study of the light-induced and temperature-dependent changes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centers enriched in [4′-13C]tyrosine. Biochemistry 31:11038–11049
Fischer WW, Hemp J, Johnson JE (2016) Evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 44:647–683. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054810
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB et al (2009) Gaussian 09, revision D. 01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford
Gisriel C, Sarrou I, Ferlez B et al (2017) Structure of a symmetric photosynthetic reaction center-photosystem. Science 357:1021–1025. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5611
Golbeck JH (2003) Shared thematic elements in photochemical reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1642–1646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.5.1642
Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L (2011) Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J Comput Chem 32:1456–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759
Janssen GJ, Daviso E, van Son M et al (2010) Observation of the solid-state photo-CIDNP effect in entire cells of cyanobacteria Synechocystis. Photosynth Res 104:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-009-9508-1
Janssen GJ, Roy E, Matysik J, Alia A (2012) 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR to reveal functional heterogeneity in electron donor of different plant organisms. Appl Magn Reson 42:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-011-0283-8
Jeschke G (1998) A new mechanism for chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization in the solid state. J Am Chem Soc 120:4425–4429. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja973744u
Jeschke G, Matysik J (2003) A reassessment of the origin of photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization effects in solids. Chem Phys 294:239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(03)00278-7
Kobayashi M, Akiyama M, Yamamura M et al (1998) Structural determination of the novel Zn-containing bacteriochlorophyll in Acidiphilium rubrum. Photomed Photobiol 20:75–80
Kobayashi M, Akiyama M, Kano H, Kise H (2006) Spectroscopy and structure determination. In: Govindjee, Sharkey TD (eds) Advances in photosynthesis and respiration, vol 25. Chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls: biochemistry, biophysics, function and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 79–94
Kobayashi M, Sorimachi Y, Fukayama D et al (2016) Physicochemical properties of chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls. In: Pessaraki M (ed) Handbook of photosynthesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 95–148
Li H, Jubelirer S, Garcia Costas AM et al (2009) Multiple antioxidant proteins protect Chlorobaculum tepidum against oxygen and reactive oxygen species. Arch Microbiol 191:853–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-009-0514-7
Liu Z, Klatt CG, Ludwig M, Rusch DB, Jensen SI, Kühl M, Ward DM, Bryant DA (2012) ‘Candidatus Thermochlorobacter aerophilum’: an aerobic chlorophotoheterotrophic member of the phylum Chlorobi. ISME J 6:1869–1882
Madigan MT (2001) Firmicutes. In: Whitman W (ed) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Springer, New York, pp 625–630
Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (2009) Performance of SM6, SM8, and SMD on the SAMPL1 test set for the prediction of small-molecule solvation free energies. J Phys Chem B 113:6378–6396. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809094y
Martin WF, Beatty JT, Bryant DA (2018) A physiological perspective on the origin and evolution of photosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:205–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux056
Matysik J, Alia A, Hollander JG et al (2000) A set-up to study photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization in photosynthetic reaction centres by solid-state NMR. Indian J Biochem Biophys 37:418
Matysik J, Diller A, Roy E, Alia A (2009) The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect. Photosynth Res 102:427–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-009-9403-9
McDermott A, Zysmilich MG, Polenova T (1998) Solid state NMR studies of photoinduced polarization in photosynthetic reaction centers: mechanism and simulations. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 11:21–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-2040(97)00094-5
Oh-oka H (2007) Type 1 reaction center of photosynthetic heliobacteria. Photochem Photobiol 83:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1562/2006-03-29-IR-860
Overmann J (2001) Chlorobi. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Springer, New York, pp 601–605
Polenova T, McDermott AE (1999) A coherent mixing mechanism explains the photoinduced nuclear polarization in photosynthetic reaction centers. J Phys Chem 103:535–548. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9822642
Prakash S, Alia A, Gast P, de Groot HJM, Jeschke G, Matysik J (2005) Magnetic field dependence of photo-CIDNP MAS NMR on photosynthetic reaction centres of Rhodobacter sphaeroides WT. J Am Chem Soc 127:14290–14298. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0623616
Prakash S, Alia A, Gast P et al (2006) Photo-CIDNP MAS NMR in intact cells of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26: molecular and atomic resolution at nanomolar concentration. J Am Chem Soc 128:12794–12799. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0623616
Rassolov VA, Ratner MA, Pople JA et al (2001) 6-31G* basis set for third-row atoms. J Comput Chem 22:976–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.1058
Roy E, Alia A, Gast P et al (2007a) Photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization in the reaction center of the green sulphur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum observed by 13C MAS NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta 1767:610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.12.012
Roy E, Diller A, Alia A et al (2007b) Magnetic field dependence of 13C photo-CIDNP MAS NMR in plant photosystems I and II. Appl Magn Reson 31:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166256
Roy E, Rohmer T, Gast P et al (2008) Characterization of the primary radical pair in reaction centers of Heliobacillus mobilis by 13C photo-CIDNP MAS NMR. Biochemistry 47:4629–4635. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi800030g
Ruud K, Helgaker T, Bak KL et al (1993) Hartree–Fock limit magnetizabilities from London orbitals. J Chem Phys 99:3847–3859. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466131
Schulten EAM, Matysik J, Alia A et al (2002)) 13C MAS NMR and photo-CIDNP reveal a pronounced asymmetry in the electronic ground state of the special pair of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers. Biochemistry 41:8708–8717. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi025608u
Sosnovsky DV, Jeschke G, Matysik J, Vieth H-M, Ivanov KL (2016) Level crossing analysis of chemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization: towards a common description of liquid-state and solid-state cases. J Chem Phys 144:144202. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945341
Tank M, Bryant DA (2015a) Chloracidobacterium thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov.: an anoxygenic microaerophilic chlorophotoheterotrophic acidobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1426–1430. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000113
Tank M, Bryant DA (2015b) Nutrient requirements and growth physiology of the photoheterotrophic acidobacterium, Chloracidobacterium thermophilum. Front Microbiol 6:226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00226
Tank M, Thiel V, Bryant DA (2017) A panoply of phototrophs: an overview of chlorophototrophs found in the microbial mats of alkaline siliceous hot springs in Yellowstone National Park, WY, USA. In: Hallenbeck PC (ed) Modern topics in the phototrophic prokaryotes: environmental and applied aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46261-5
Thamarath SS, Heberle J, Hore P et al (2010) Solid-state photo-CIDNP effect observed in phototropin LOV1-C57S by 13C magic-angle spinning NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132:15542–15543. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1082969
Thamarath SS, Alia A, Daviso E et al (2012) Whole cell nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of two photochemically active states of the photosynthetic reaction center in heliobacteria. Biochemistry 51:5763–5773. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi300468y
Thiel V, Tank M, Bryant DA (2017) Diversity of chlorophototrophic bacteria revealed in the omics era. Annu Rev Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040500
Tsukatani Y, Romberger SP, Golbeck JH, Bryant DA (2012) Isolation and characterization of homodimeric type-I reaction center complex from Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum, an aerobic chlorophototroph. J Biol Chem 287:5720–5732. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.323329
van Heukelem L, Lewitus AJ, Kana TM, Craft NE (1994) Improved separations of phytoplankton pigments using temperature-controlled high performance liquid chromatography. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 114:304–313
Wakao N, Yokoi N, Isoyama N et al (1996) Discovery of natural photosynthesis using Zn-containing bacteriochlorophyll in an aerobic bacterium Acidiphilium rubrum. Plant cell Physiol 37:889–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a0290293
Wen J, Tsukatani Y, Cui W, Zhang H, Gross ML, Bryant DA, Blankenship RE (2011) Structural model and spectroscopic characteristics of the FMO antenna protein from the aerobic chlorophototroph, Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1807:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.09.008
Zeng Y, Feng F, Medová H et al (2014) Functional type 2 photosynthetic reaction centers found in the rare bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7795–7800. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400295111
Zill JC (2017a) Der Festkörper photo-CIDNP-Effekt im Baum des Lebens, Dissertation, Universität Leipzig
Zill JC, Kansy M, Goss R et al (2017b) Photo-CIDNP in the reaction center of the datom Cyclotella meneghiniana observed by 13C MAS NMR. Z Phys Chem 231:347–367. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2016-0806
Zysmilich MG, McDermott A (1994) Photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization in the solid-state 15N spectra of reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26. J Am Chem Soc 116:8362–8363. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00097a052
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Matthias Findeisen for technical assistence, Eva-Maria Höhn (Group of Professor Dr. Detlev Belder, Universität Leipzig) for the Raman measurements, and Prof. Dr. Stefan Berger (Leipzig) for discussions. J.M. acknowledges the generous support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (MA4972/2-1). Studies in the laboratories of D.A.B. and J.H.G. were supported by Grants DE-FG02-94ER20137 and DE-SC0010575, respectively, from the Photosynthetic Systems Program, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (CSGB), Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U. S. Department of Energy. I.S. is supported by the ERC Starting Grant ‘PhotoMutant’ (678169). Y.L would like to thank Dr. Dror Noy (MIGAL) and his financial support from the ERC (GA 615217) and ISF (GA 558/14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zill, J.C., He, Z., Tank, M. et al. 15N photo-CIDNP MAS NMR analysis of reaction centers of Chloracidobacterium thermophilum. Photosynth Res 137, 295–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0504-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0504-1