Abstract
Background
Legume plants can establish symbiotic interactions with rhizobia to form nodules, in which atmosphere dinitrogen (N ) is reduced to ammonium (NH) as a nitrogen (N) source for legume plants. This process is called biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). It is widely believed that BNF in legumes is phosphorus (P)-demanding and might be limited by P availability.
Scope
Here, we first discuss the overlooked role of plant P-acquisition/−use strategies in maintaining legume nodulation and BNF, then summarize the identified genes or regulatory mechanisms supporting this. Secondly, we synthesize emerging evidences showing how microbial strategies and soil management promote legume nodulation and BNF. Finally, we propose studying legume nodulation and BNF in a plant-soil-microbe system under low-P conditions.
Conclusions
Such a system perspective of plant, soil, and microbial strategies will provide valuable insights into mechanisms underlying nodulation under nutrient-limited soil conditions and how to explore belowground interactions for sustainable development in terrestrial ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) is one of the macronutrients required for plant growth in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Farmers add large amounts of N fertilizer to agricultural soil, which has substantially boosted crop production and ensured food security globally. However, most of these N inputs are not taken up by crops, but leach into lakes, causing eutrophication and biodiversity loss globally (Zhang et al. 2015). In addition, the industrial production of N fertilizer in the Haber-Bosch process, which synthesizes ammonium (NH3) from hydrogen and atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) with the help of an iron catalyst at very high temperatures and pressures (400–500 °C, 15–20 MPa), consumes large amounts of fossil fuel and threatens environmental quality via releasing a great amount of greenhouse gases (Soloveichik 2019). In contrast, biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which reduces N2 to NH3 by microorganisms, for example, in symbiosis with legume plants, is environmentally friendly and provides an alternative N source for green agricultural development. Meanwhile, N-fixing legumes also play essential roles in maintaining natural ecosystem services, such as enriching soil N fertility and improving soil organic matter quality (Binkley 2005; Voigtlaender et al. 2012). Therefore, it is worthwhile to study factors affecting BNF and apply them in natural and agricultural ecosystems.
Following N, phosphorus (P) is the second essential macronutrient for plant growth, but it is poorly available in natural and agricultural ecosystems (Johnston et al. 2014; Vitousek et al. 2010). It is easily absorbed by (hydr)oxides of aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) in acid soils or precipitated as calcium (Ca)-P in calcareous soils (Hinsinger 2001). In addition, the non-renewable source of P for fertilizers, rock phosphate, is reported to disappear in the following few decades (Gilbert 2009). Therefore, P is restricting or will restrict the physiology and growth of plants in most soils. The process of BNF entails a high P cost, and low P availability might limit nodulation and productivity of the legumes (Raven 2012). However, legumes are abundant in many ecosystems with strongly weathered, P-impoverished, or low available P soils, such as the Core Cape Subregion of South Africa (Lemaire et al. 2015; Manning and Goldblatt 2012), the Brazilian Caatinga and Cerrado biomes (dos Reis Jr et al. 2010; Sprent et al. 1996), and the Southwest Australian Floristic Region (Hopper and Gioia 2004; Zemunik et al. 2015). These suggest that some native legumes might have evolved strategies to maintain nodulation and BNF under P-limiting conditions, probably because they could increase P-use efficiency by efficient plant P-acquisition/−use strategies or microbial strategies under P-limiting conditions.
Different P-acquisition or -use strategies and biological nitrogen fixation
For most crop legumes, low-P conditions may curtail BNF directly by impairing nodule formation and activity; or indirectly, by restricting the growth and photosynthesis of host plants (Sulieman and Tran 2015). Low P availability may limit nitrogenase activity by restricting ATP production in nodules and ribosomal RNA turnover required to replace damaged nitrogenase enzymes, or by impairing signal transduction, membrane biosynthesis, or activation of enzymes involved in nodule development and function (Graham and Vance 2000; Raven 2012). Low P availability may also restrict photosynthesis and plant growth, or negatively affect carbon flow to nodules and down-regulate BNF (Almeida et al. 2000; Schulze 2004). However, this negative effect of low P availability would not apply to BNF in legumes with efficient P-acquisition strategies or those adapted to soils with low P availability (Fig. 1a). For example, exuded phosphatases enhance the capacity of legumes to acquire soil P and contribute to their abundance in tropical forests and other low-P ecosystems (Houlton et al. 2008; Nasto et al. 2014; Olde Venterink 2011; Png et al. 2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) also improve P acquisition, and then stimulate BNF and photosynthesis under low-P conditions (Bournaud et al. 2018; Bulgarelli et al. 2017; Nasto et al. 2014; Püschel et al. 2017). Carboxylates also enhance the capacity of white lupin (Lupinus albus) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) to acquire soil P and maintain a stable P concentration in nodules and BNF under low-P conditions; nodules tend to be located in the cluster-root zones of white lupin where carboxylates are released (Nasr Esfahani et al. 2016; Schulze et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2019). Other studies reported that legume crops could acclimate to low-P stress by increasing root nodule phytase and phosphatase activities (Araújo et al. 2008). Some legumes may use more than one P-acquisition strategy, for example, Kennedia, which is native to the south-western Australian kwongan, release carboxylates and form AMF under P-limited conditions (Adams et al. 2002; Ryan et al. 2012). Therefore, the contribution of efficient P-acquisition strategies in maintaining nodulation and BNF warrants further investigation.
Efficient P-use strategies would allow legumes to maintain a stable P concentration in nodules and BNF (Fig. 1a). For example, chickpea tends to reallocate P from leaves and roots to nodules under low-P conditions (Nasr Esfahani et al. 2016). In a hydroponic experiment, Acacia mangium was also shown to preferentially allocate P to nodules and enhance P use efficiency to maintain BNF under P-limited conditions (Ribet and Drevon 1996). To use P efficiently, some plants also replace phospholipids with sulfolipids and galactolipids under low-P conditions (Andersson et al. 2003; Hammond et al. 2011). Genes involved in galactolipid synthesis are induced in P-deficient root nodules of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), suggesting that replacing phospholipids with galactolipids or sulfolipids helps maintain a stable P concentration in nodules and BNF (Hernández et al. 2009). This indicates that legume nodules express very flexible mechanisms for P recycling and internal P conservation. Efficient P-use strategies contribute to the functioning of BNF and should be considered in studies of BNF.
Efficient P-acquisition or -use strategies may maintain BNF differently (Fig. 1a). For example, flavonoids produced under P-limited conditions may induce nodule initiation by affecting auxin metabolism (Hassan and Mathesius 2012; Wasson et al. 2006) or activating the expression of nod-genes in legume hosts (Cooper 2007; Hassan and Mathesius 2012; Zhang et al. 2009) (Fig. 1a). In addition, carboxylates are generally considered the major energy sources for the respiration of bacteroids in nodules and serve as the predominant carbon skeletons for NH4+ assimilation in nodules (Rosendahl et al. 1990; Valentine et al. 2017). This suggests that efficient P-acquisition and -use strategies are essential for BNF, and more studies on their potential roles in BNF may enhance our understanding of functioning in natural and agroecosystems.
Molecular mechanisms involved in nodulation under P deficiency
Pi transporters and their regulators in P acquisition and transport in legumes and nodules
Plants acquire P from the soil via inorganic P (Pi) transporters located in the plasma membrane (PM) of roots cells, and most Pi transporters belong to the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER 1 (PHT1) family (Wang et al. 2021b). There are two pathways describing Pi entry into nodules, namely a direct uptake by the nodule and an indirect pathway involving Pi transfer from host plant roots to the nodule (Al-Niemi et al. 1998). Studies on soybean (Glycine max) showed that a nodule-localized PHT1 gene GmPT7 is responsible for direct Pi entry into the nodules (Chen et al. 2019), and another PHT1 gene GmPT5 functions in transporting Pi from the host roots to nodules, especially under P-limited conditions (Qin et al. 2012), thus enhancing BNF and production. PHOSPHATE1(PHO1)-type Pi transporters were described in multiple plant species and play important roles in allocating Pi between different plant tissues or organs. For example, Arabidopsis thaliana PHO1 functions in the loading of Pi into the xylem and transfer of Pi to the shoot (Hamburger et al. 2002). Recently, two closely related members of the Medicago truncatula PHO1 family, namely MtPHO1.1 and MtPHO1.2, were identified in nodules and shown to transport Pi from infected nodule cells to bacteroids (Müller 2021; Nguyen et al. 2021). All of this suggests that Pi transporters play important roles in BNF by maintaining P concentrations in plants, nodules, or bacteroids.
PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 (PHR1), a constitutively expressed MYB-domain transcription factor, induces the expression of PHT1 under P deficiency. This PHR1-PHT1 module plays important role in maintaining stable Pi concentrations in different organs (Guo et al. 2015; Nilsson et al. 2007). PHR-PHT1 modules also maintain a stable P concentration in soybean nodules (Lu et al. 2020). GmPHR1/4 proteins directly bind to P1BS elements on GmPHT1;1/4/11 promoters and subsequently regulate their expression. In N2-fixing regions, GmPHR1 not only enhances GmPHT1;1 expression, but also represses GmPHT1;11 in non-N2-fixing regions, both GmPHR1 and GmPHR4 enhance the expression of GmPHT1;1 and GmPHT1;4, and repress the expression of GmPHT1;11 (Lu et al. 2020). GmPHR25 is also induced by Pi starvation which in turn increases the transcripts of 11 out of 14 high-affinity Pi transporters as well as other five Pi starvation-responsive genes in soybean hairy roots, indicating that GmPHR25 is also a vital regulator in maintaining a stable Pi concentration in soybean (Xue et al. 2017). This suggests the complexity and tight control of PHR-PHT1 modules in maintaining P concentration in nodules.
The microRNA399 (miR399), which belongs to the most ancient and highly conserved microRNA families in monocots and dicots, is a vital regulator of P uptake and transport in plant (Cuperus et al. 2011). The miR399 downregulates its target gene PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2), a ubiquitin conjugating E2 enzyme which results in repression of Pi transporters and then Pi uptake and transport in A. thaliana, maize (Zea mays), and rice (Oryza sativa) (Bari et al. 2006; Du et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2013). Induction of miR399 in nodules also enhances BNF and soybean growth, possibly via improving Pi uptake to achieve a better Pi-N balance in the nodules (Fan et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2013), suggesting that miR399 plays similar roles in non-legumes and legumes. Further research showed that Pi deficiency-dependent induction of miR399 is significantly suppressed in a phosphate-starvation responsive1 (phr1) loss-of-function Arabidopsis mutant (Bari et al. 2006), indicating that miR399 is the target gene of PHR1. Similarly, rice OsPHR2 enhances the accumulation of OsmiR399 and subsequently suppresses the expression of OsPHO2. Mutation of OsPHO2 increases the expression of several PHT genes (e.g., OsPT1, OsPT2, OsPT4, and OsPT18), which results in an increase of Pi uptake in the roots and transport from roots to shoot under low-P conditions (Hu et al. 2011). These findings suggest that PHR1, miR399, and PHO2 define a conserved signaling pathway that responds to Pi deficiency in plants (Bari et al. 2006).
As mentioned above, PHRs activate the expression of several phosphate-starvation-induced genes (including PHTs) by binding to the P1BS element under low-P conditions to improve Pi uptake and transport (Guo et al. 2015; Nilsson et al. 2007). However, proteins containing the SYG1/PHO81/XPR1 (SPX) work as phosphate sensors and negatively regulate the binding affinity of PHRs to P1BS element through protein-protein interaction in Arabidopsis and rice under P-limited conditions (Puga et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2014; Zhong et al. 2018). Further studies showed that proteins containing the SPX-domain also play important roles in regulating Pi uptake and transport in the legumes (Yao et al. 2014a; Yao et al. 2014b). Proteins containing the SPX-domain suppress OsPHR2-mediated induction of symbiosis-related genes via the P1BS element and inhibit mycorrhizal colonization. In contrast, plants overexpressing OsPHR2 show increased mycorrhizal colonization (Das et al. 2022; Shi et al. 2021). All of this indicates that PHR-SPX modules are not only involved in direct P uptake and transport pathways in plants, but also in indirect P uptake pathways (mycorrhizal symbiosis) under P deficiency.
Taken together, Pi transporters and their vital regulators, including PHR1, miR399, and proteins containing SPX domains, play essential roles in maintaining stable P concentration in nodules mainly via maintaining overall plant P uptake. However, it should be borne in mind that this may only function with a combination of P-mining strategies under P deficiency, for example, the hydrolyzation of organic P by phosphatases or other enzymes. This is because under low-P conditions, soil characteristics and root morphology, rather than the kinetic properties of the P-uptake system, dominate the rate of plant P acquisition (Lambers 2022). There are also some other genes involved in adjusting root architecture to take up P. For example, GmPTF1 regulates the expression of GmEXPB2 via binding the E-box motif in its promoter region which adjusts root architecture and increases the P-acquisition efficiency (Li et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2021a). All of this suggests that all the genes or regulatory mechanisms involved in increasing whole-plant P acquisition (architectural, morphological, or physiological strategies) and transport between different organs might be involved in maintaining nodular P concentration, nodulation, and BNF.
Genes involved in P utilization in nodulation
Normal nodulation and BNF can be sustained in white lupin after 21 days of P withdrawal and in M. truncatula on day five after P withdrawal (Cabeza et al. 2014; Schulze et al. 2006), suggesting that P can be translocated preferentially to nodules to maintain BNF. Among all the genes related to maintaining stable nodular P concentrations, those encoding acid phosphatases (APases) have been studied most, as APases hydrolyze organic P (Po) to Pi and increase whole plant Pi uptake under low P supply. Purple acid phosphatases (PAPs), a distinct group of APases, are predominantly studied for their roles in Pi uptake and translocation in plants. For example, overexpression of OsPAP26 in rice increases Po utilization; it also remobilizes P from senescing to growing leaves (Gao et al. 2017). Several PAPs are upregulated in nodules or other organs under low-P conditions, indicating that they might be involved in P acquisition and assimilation, and possibly BNF (Li et al. 2012). Indeed, overexpression of GmPAP12 increases APase activity of nodules and promotes P utilization in soybean nodules, thus resulting in enhanced nodulation and BNF (Wang et al. 2020). Overexpression of intracellular PAP, GmPAP21, also significantly enhances both acid phosphatase activity and growth of hairy roots under P-limited conditions without inoculation, although overexpression of GmPAP21 resulted in lower soluble P concentration than that in the control line, suggesting it enhanced internal P utilization. However, it significantly inhibited nodule growth after inoculation (Li et al. 2017). In addition, overexpression of a PAP gene from Astragalus sinicus, AsPDD1, inhibits nodulation through hydrolysis of ADP and ATP (Wang et al. 2015). This indicates that PAPs may also play a role in nodule formation and BNF beyond P utilization. The expression of phosphoenol pyruvate phosphatase (PEPase) and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FPBase) in common bean also correlated well with P-use efficiency in nodules (Bargaz et al. 2012; Lazali et al. 2016), suggesting there exist other pathways for nodules to acclimate to P depletion.
Other plant strategies of legume nodules to acclimate to P deficiency
Phosphate-starvation responsive GmSPX5 interacts with GmNF-YC4 to activate GmASL6 expression and promotes BNF, suggesting that nodules may acclimate to P starvation through mediating asparagine metabolic process (Zhuang et al. 2021). In addition, soybean genotypes enhance transcription of β-expansin gene INCREASING NODULE SIZE 1 (GmINS1) and GmEXPB2 develop more and larger nodules under P-limited conditions. Further experiments showed that overexpression of GmINS1 and GmEXPB2 promotes nodule enlargement (Li et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2021b). This suggests that soybean expansion members (i.e., GmEXPB2 and GmINS1) acclimate to P-limited conditions by contributing to nodule development and growth. In addition, expression of GmEXPB2 increases P-acquisition efficiency via adjusting root architecture, suggesting that these genes have multiple functions in acclimating to P deficiency. All of this indicates that in addition to maintaining stable P concentration through increasing P uptake from soil or translocation from other organs, legumes also use other strategies to acclimate to low-P conditions.
Microbial strategies in maintaining nodulation
Except for the AMF that forms a symbiosis with plants and transfers P mobilized by bacteria to the host plant, there are other microbes, which are endowed with P-solubilizing activity and are called P-solubilizing microorganisms (Fig. 1b). These P-solubilizing microorganisms may convert insoluble P to soluble P by various mechanisms such as acidification, chelation, exchange reactions, and phosphatase enzymes (Bargaz et al. 2018; Jones and Oburger 2011; Richardson and Simpson 2011; Zaidi et al. 2017). Like plant P-acquisition strategies, of all the mechanisms of P-solubilizing microorganisms, the release of carboxylates and their functions in converting insoluble P to soluble P is considered a principal strategy in acquiring P from the soil (Bargaz et al. 2018; Zaidi et al. 2017). Thus, increased whole-plant P acquisition may maintain a stable P concentration in nodules and ensure nodulation and BNF in legumes. For example, compared with single inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, co-inoculation with P-solubilizing Pseudomonas strains significantly increases nodule numbers, and dry weight of soybean in pot and field experiments (Afzal et al. 2010; Rosas et al. 2006). Phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. FM7d also increases the symbiotic properties of the alfalfa plants (Guiñazú et al. 2010). These P-solubilizing microorganisms and other plant-growth-promoting bacteria may also enhance nodulation, BNF, and yield by producing plant-growth-promoting enzymes, phytohormones, antifungal compounds, toxin-resistance compounds, and other high-value bioactive molecules, which play vital roles in whole-plant growth, like deleterious microbe inhibition, disease suppression (Bargaz et al. 2018; Naik et al. 2008; Rosier et al. 2018). All of this suggests that plant-growth-promoting bacteria, including P-solubilizing microorganisms, also promote the growth of legumes by other mechanisms.
Integration of nodulation in a plant-soil-microbe system
Plant are hosts to various microbes in their natural environments, trading or competing for carbon and nutrients with microbes, thus affecting microbial communities; microbes may also affect plant health and growth via their metabolites. As mentioned above, both efficient plant and microbial P-acquisition/−use strategies contribute to nodulation and BNF, and there are many studies summarizing efficient plant or microbial strategies in the P acquisition or utilization (Castagno et al. 2021; Lambers 2022; Pang et al. 2018). However, few studies focused on promoting nodulation and BNF via a combination of efficient plant P-acquisition/utilization and microbial strategies under P-limited conditions. Recent studies show that one of the main P-acquisition strategies, i.e., AMF, may modulate the rhizosphere microbiota to promote nodulation of M. truncatula and other legumes (Wang et al. 2021a) (Fig. 1b). Extraradical hyphae produced by AMF also facilitated translocation of rhizobia from non-legume to legume plant, which stimulated nodulation in the host legume (de Novais et al. 2020) (Fig. 1b). In addition, the release of flavonoids by non-legumes, another P-acquisition strategy, also acts as a signal to enhance nodulation and BNF in neighboring legumes (Li et al. 2016) (Fig. 1c). This suggests that plants may regulate nodulation and BNF via efficient plant-microbe or microbe-microbe interactions. The release of carboxylates, one of the main P-acquisition strategies, could enhance soil organic matter decomposition and thus making P and other nutrients available to plants (Clarholm et al. 2015; Ding et al. 2021; Keiluweit et al. 2015). This may shift the microbial composition (Ding et al. 2021; Marschner et al. 2002; Sasse et al. 2018). Will this shift in microbial composition promote nodulation and BNF in legumes under low-P conditions? NRT1.1B, a rice nitrate transporter and sensor, is associated with the recruitment of a large proportion of bacteria with N metabolism functions which contribute to the N-use efficiency (Zhang et al. 2019). How about those legumes with efficient P uptake and transport genes or regulatory mechanisms? Will the change of these genes or regulatory mechanisms recruit P-solubilizing bacteria or rhizobia in legumes? How about other P-acquisition/−use strategies? There are too many questions that still need an answer. Therefore, we propose to consider these questions from a system perspective, namely integrating P-acquisition/−use and microbial strategies in the study of nodulation and BNF under P-limited conditions (Fig. 1).
Except for plant and microbial strategies, soil management is also important in improving plant P uptake and nodulation (Bi et al. 2020; Jing et al. 2010; Li et al. 2016). For example, a combination of mineral P and manure increased phoD gene abundance and P availability in paddy soil, and the reduced P input enriched the abundance of Bradyrhizobium and Methylobacterium (Bi et al. 2020), suggesting its potential role in promoting inoculation and BNF. In the intercropping system, faba bean (Vicia faba) root exudates (citrate and phosphatase) promoted root growth and P uptake of maize via increasing soil P availability, while maize root exudates promoted flavonoid synthesis in faba bean, which triggered the expression of Nod factor and increased nodulation and BNF in faba bean. This indicates facilitative root–root interactions in promoting P uptake and the nodulation (Li et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016). In addition, a localized application of P combined with ammonium significantly enhanced maize growth and nutrient use at the early stages by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification, suggesting that modifying rhizosphere processes in the field may be an effective management strategy for improving nutrient use efficiency and plant growth (Jing et al. 2010). All of this emphasizes the importance of soil management in P uptake and inoculation, and they should also be considered to maximize plant and soil microbial strategies in promoting P uptake and nodulation in this whole system (Fig. 1).
Recently, two new concepts, “Rhizobiont” and “Holo-omics” were conceived (Shen et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2021). In Rhizobiont, plants, roots, rhizosphere, hyphosphere, and their associated microbes were integrated to unravel underlying mechanisms of plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions that drive high nutrient-use efficiency (Shen et al. 2021). We might adapt this theory to uncover the mechanisms of plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions that drive BNF under low-P conditions. Specifically, we need to choose legume genotypes with efficient P-acquisition/−use strategies, add microbes that could enhance P solubilization or plant growth, and adopt soil management to maximize plant or microbial effect (Fig. 1). We need to design experiments that consider and trace the carbon and nutrients exchanged in the plant, soil, and microbial parts, and analyze signaling and metabolic interactions in plant-soil, plant-microbe, and soil-microbe surfaces from a system perspective. The theory of “Holo-omics”, which incorporates data from transcriptomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, and proteomics from both plant and microbes (Xu et al. 2021), might be the key to opening the window of plant-soil-microbial interactions. A case study using holo-omics to investigate the interaction between drought stress and the development of the sorghum microbiome is well demonstrated by Xu et al. (2018). Detailed careful considerations and challenges while adopting this method could be found in the review written by Xu et al. (2021).
Concluding remarks
Nitrogen and P are two macronutrients that are needed in large amounts by plants in terrestrial natural and agricultural ecosystems; both play vital roles in photosynthesis, respiration, productivity, and terrestrial plant diversity (Lambers and Oliveira 2019; Oldroyd and Leyser 2020). Therefore, a large amount of N and P fertilizers are used in intensive agriculture. This is valuable in promoting agricultural productivity, but causes environmental problems, like eutrophication. In addition, phosphate rock is finite, and the world may run out of it in the future (Fixen and Johnston 2012; Gilbert 2009; Johnston et al. 2014). To mitigate these problems and maintain plant productivity, we need to search for sustainable natural and agricultural ecosystems. Efficient plant P-acquisition/−use strategies, microbial strategies, and sustainable forest, grassland, and cropland management are effective in promoting P-use efficiency and nodulation, and integration of these strategies might maximize their functions in N and P uptake and assist the development of sustainability in natural and agricultural ecosystems.
Many studies are focusing on exploring genes or regulatory mechanisms involved in P acquisition and its effect on BNF; however, the effect of the investigation of genes related to P-use efficiency and its effect on BNF, and their related metabolites involved in attracting P-solubilizing bacteria or regulating microbial composition that is beneficial for inoculation are rarely studied. Further studies of these aspects will advance our knowledge of the essential genetic and molecular components required for the promotion of P uptake/use and nodulation, enhance our understanding of plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions, and provide potential tools to boost P and N uptake in legumes. As a vital component of plant-soil-microbe systems, soil management should also be carefully studied and adopted in the whole system. Overall, underpinning genes and regulatory mechanism of legume P uptake and nodulation from a system perspective will probably provide new insights to increase plant productivity and nutrient-use efficiency via optimizing plant, soil, and microbe combinations.
Data availability
This does not apply to this manuscript.
Code availability
This does not apply to this manuscript.
References
Adams MA, Bell TL, Pate JS (2002) Phosphorus sources and availability modify growth and distribution of root clusters and nodules of native Australian legumes. Plant Cell Environ 25:837–850
Afzal A, Bano A, Fatima M (2010) Higher soybean yield by inoculation with N-fixing and P-solubilizing bacteria. Agron Sustain Dev 30:487–495
Almeida JF, Hartwig UA, Frehner M, Nösberger J, Lüscher A (2000) Evidence that P deficiency induces N feedback regulation of symbiotic N2 fixation in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). J Exp Bot 51:1289–1297
Al-Niemi TS, Kahn ML, McDermott TR (1998) Phosphorus uptake by bean nodules. Plant Soil 198:71–78
Andersson MX, Stridh MH, Larsson KE, Liljenberg C, Sandelius AS (2003) Phosphate-deficient oat replaces a major portion of the plasma membrane phospholipids with the galactolipid digalactosyldiacylglycerol. FEBS Lett 537:128–132
Araújo AP, Plassard C, Drevon JJ (2008) Phosphatase and phytase activities in nodules of common bean genotypes at different levels of phosphorus supply. Plant Soil 312:129
Bargaz A, Ghoulam C, Amenc L, Lazali M, Faghire M, Abadie J, Drevon JJ (2012) A phosphoenol pyruvate phosphatase transcript is induced in the root nodule cortex of Phaseolus vulgaris under conditions of phosphorus deficiency. J Exp Bot 63:4723–4730
Bargaz A, Lyamlouli K, Chtouki M, Zeroual Y, Dhiba D (2018) Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Front Microbiol 9:1606
Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible W-R (2006) PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol 141:988–999
Bi Q-F, Li K-J, Zheng B-X, Liu X-P, Li H-Z, Jin B-J, Ding K, Yang X-R, Lin X-Y, Zhu Y-G (2020) Partial replacement of inorganic phosphorus (P) by organic manure reshapes phosphate mobilizing bacterial community and promotes P bioavailability in a paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 703:134977
Binkley D (2005) How nitrogen-fixing trees change soil carbon. In: Binkley D, Menyailo O (eds) Tree species effects on soils: implications for global change. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Bournaud C, James EK, de Faria SM, Lebrun M, Melkonian R, Duponnois R, Tisseyre P, Moulin L, Prin Y (2018) Interdependency of efficient nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhization in Piptadenia gonoacantha, a Brazilian legume tree. Plant Cell Environ 41:2008–2020
Bulgarelli RG, Marcos FCC, Ribeiro RV, de Andrade SAL (2017) Mycorrhizae enhance nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in phosphorus-starved soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Environ Exp Bot 140:26–33
Cabeza RA, Liese R, Lingner A, von Stieglitz I, Neumann J, Salinas-Riester G, Pommerenke C, Dittert K, Schulze J (2014) RNA-seq transcriptome profiling reveals that Medicago truncatula was nodules acclimate N2 fixation before emerging P deficiency reaches the nodules. J Exp Bot 65:6035–6048
Castagno LN, Sannazzaro AI, Gonzalez ME, Pieckenstain FL, Estrella MJ (2021) Phosphobacteria as key actors to overcome phosphorus deficiency in plants. Ann Appl Biol 178:256–267
Chen L, Qin L, Zhou L, Li X, Chen Z, Sun L, Wang W, Lin Z, Zhao J, Yamaji N, Ma JF, Gu M, Xu G, Liao H (2019) A nodule-localized phosphate transporter GmPT7 plays an important role in enhancing symbiotic N2 fixation and yield in soybean. New Phytol 221:2013–2025
Clarholm M, Skyllberg U, Rosling A (2015) Organic acid induced release of nutrients from metal-stabilized soil organic matter – the unbutton model. Soil Biol Biochem 84:168–176
Cooper JE (2007) Early interactions between legumes and rhizobia: disclosing complexity in a molecular dialogue. J Appl Microbiol 103:1355–1365
Cuperus JT, Fahlgren N, Carrington JC (2011) Evolution and functional diversification of miRNA genes. Plant Cell 23:431–442
Das D, Paries M, Hobecker K, Gigl M, Dawid C, Lam H-M, Zhang J, Chen M, Gutjahr C (2022) PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE transcription factors enable arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Nat Commun 13:477
de Novais CB, Sbrana C, da Conceição JE, Rouws LFM, Giovannetti M, Avio L, Siqueira JO, Saggin Júnior OJ, da Silva EMR, de Faria SM (2020) Mycorrhizal networks facilitate the colonization of legume roots by a symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Mycorrhiza 30:389–396
Ding W, Cong W-F, Lambers H (2021) Plant phosphorus-acquisition and -use strategies affect soil carbon cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 36:899–906
dos Reis Jr FB, Simon MF, Gross E, Boddey RM, Elliott GN, Neto NE, de Fatima LM, de Queiroz LP, Scotti MR, Chen W-M, Norén A, Rubio MC, de Faria SM, Bontemps C, Goi SR, Young JPW, Sprent JI, James EK (2010) Nodulation and nitrogen fixation by Mimosa spp. in the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes of Brazil. New Phytol 186:934–946
Du Q, Wang K, Zou C, Xu C, Li W-X (2018) The PILNCR1-miR399 regulatory module is important for low phosphate tolerance in maize. Plant Physiol 177:1743–1753
Fan K, Wong-Bajracharya J, Lin X, Ni M, Ku YS, Li MW, Tian CF, Chan TF, Lam HM (2021) Differentially expressed microRNAs that target functional genes in mature soybean nodules. Plant Genome 14:e20103
Fixen PE, Johnston AM (2012) World fertilizer nutrient reserves: a view to the future. J Sci Food Agric 92:1001–1005
Gao W, Lu L, Qiu W, Wang C, Shou H (2017) OsPAP26 encodes a major purple acid phosphatase and regulates phosphate remobilization in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 58:885–892
Gilbert N (2009) Environment: the disappearing nutrient. Nature 461:716–718
Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Res 65:93–106
Guiñazú LB, Andrés JA, Del Papa MF, Pistorio M, Rosas SB (2010) Response of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to single and mixed inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Biol Fertil Soils 46:185–190
Guo M, Ruan W, Li C, Huang F, Zeng M, Liu Y, Yu Y, Ding X, Wu Y, Wu Z, Mao C, Yi K, Wu P, Mo X (2015) Integrative comparison of the role of the PHOSPHATE RESPONSE1 subfamily in phosphate signaling and homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol 168:1762–1776
Hamburger D, Rezzonico E, MacDonald-Comber Petétot J, Somerville C, Poirier Y (2002) Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. Plant Cell 14:889–902
Hammond JP, Broadley MR, Bowen HC, Spracklen WP, Hayden RM, White PJ (2011) Gene expression changes in phosphorus deficient potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leaves and the potential for diagnostic gene expression markers. PLoS One 6:e24606
Hassan S, Mathesius U (2012) The role of flavonoids in root–rhizosphere signalling: opportunities and challenges for improving plant–microbe interactions. J Exp Bot 63:3429–3444
Hernández G, Valdés-López O, Ramírez M, Goffard N, Weiller G, Aparicio-Fabre R, Fuentes SI, Erban A, Kopka J, Udvardi MK, Vance CP (2009) Global changes in the transcript and metabolic profiles during symbiotic nitrogen fixation in phosphorus-stressed common bean plants. Plant Physiol 151:1221–1238
Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195
Hopper SD, Gioia P (2004) The southwest Australian floristic region: evolution and conservation of a global hot spot of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:623–650
Houlton BZ, Wang Y-P, Vitousek PM, Field CB (2008) A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454:327–330
Hu B, Zhu C, Li F, Tang J, Wang Y, Lin A, Liu L, Che R, Chu C (2011) LEAF TIP NECROSIS1 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of multiple phosphate starvation rsponses in rice. Plant Physiol 156:1101–1115
Jing J, Rui Y, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Shen J (2010) Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crops Res 119:355–364
Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Fixen PE, Curtin D (2014) Phosphorus: its efficient use in agriculture. Adv Agron 123:177–228
Jones DL, Oburger E (2011) Solubilization of phosphorus by soil microorganisms. In: Bünemann E, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin
Keiluweit M, Bougoure JJ, Nico PS, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Kleber M (2015) Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nat Clim Chang 5:588–595
Lambers H (2022) Phosphorus acquisition and utilization in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 73:1
Lambers H, Oliveira RS (2019) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, Cham
Lambers H, Finnegan PM, Jost R, Plaxton WC, Shane MW, Stitt M (2015) Phosphorus nutrition in Proteaceae and beyond. Nature Plants 1:1–9
Lazali M, Bargaz A, Brahimi S, Amenc L, Abadie J, Drevon JJ (2016) Expression of a phosphate-starvation inducible fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene in common bean nodules correlates with phosphorus use efficiency. J Plant Physiol 205:48–56
Lemaire B, Dlodlo O, Chimphango S, Stirton C, Schrire B, Boatwright S, Honnay O, Smets E, Sprent J, James E (2015) Symbiotic diversity, specificity and distribution of rhizobia in native legumes of the Core cape subregion (South Africa). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:2–17
Li C, Gui S, Yang T, Walk T, Wang X, Liao H (2012) Identification of soybean purple acid phosphatase genes and their expression responses to phosphorus availability and symbiosis. Ann Bot 109:275–285
Li X, Zhao J, Tan Z, Zeng R, Liao H (2015) GmEXPB2, a cell wall β-expansin, affects soybean nodulation through modifying root architecture and promoting nodule formation and development. Plant Physiol 169:2640–2653
Li B, Li Y-Y, Wu H-M, Zhang F-F, Li C-J, Li X-X, Lambers H, Li L (2016) Root exudates drive interspecific facilitation by enhancing nodulation and N2 fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:6496
Li C, Li C, Zhang H, Liao H, Wang X (2017) The purple acid phosphatase GmPAP21 enhances internal phosphorus utilization and possibly plays a role in symbiosis with rhizobia in soybean. Physiol Plant 159:215–227
Lu M, Cheng Z, Zhang X-M, Huang P, Fan C, Yu G, Chen F, Xu K, Chen Q, Miao Y, Han Y, Feng X, Liu L, Fu Y-F (2020) Spatial divergence of PHR-PHT1 modules maintains phosphorus homeostasis in soybean nodules. Plant Physiol 184:236–250
Manning J, Goldblatt P (2012) Plants of the greater cape floristic region. 1: the Core cape flora. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria
Marschner P, Neumann G, Kania A, Weiskopf L, Lieberei R (2002) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of cluster roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Soil 246:167–174
Müller LM (2021) PHO1 proteins mediate phosphate transport in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Physiol 185:26–28
Naik PR, Raman G, Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N (2008) Assessment of genetic and functional diversity of phosphate solubilizing fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from rhizospheric soil. BMC Microbiol 8:230
Nasr Esfahani M, Kusano M, Nguyen KH, Watanabe Y, Ha CV, Saito K, Sulieman S, Herrera-Estrella L, Tran L-SP (2016) Adaptation of the symbiotic Mesorhizobium–chickpea relationship to phosphate deficiency relies on reprogramming of whole-plant metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E4610
Nasto MK, Alvarez-Clare S, Lekberg Y, Sullivan BW, Townsend AR, Cleveland CC (2014) Interactions among nitrogen fixation and soil phosphorus acquisition strategies in lowland tropical rain forests. Ecol Lett 17:1282–1289
Nguyen NNT, Clua J, Vetal PV, Vuarambon DJ, De Bellis D, Pervent M, Lepetit M, Udvardi M, Valentine AJ, Poirier Y (2021) PHO1 family members transport phosphate from infected nodule cells to bacteroids in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 185:196–209
Nilsson L, Müller R, Nielsen TH (2007) Increased expression of the MYB-related transcription factor, PHR1, leads to enhanced phosphate uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 30:1499–1512
Olde Venterink H (2011) Legumes have a higher root phosphatase activity than other forbs, particularly under low inorganic P and N supply. Plant Soil 347:137–146
Oldroyd GED, Leyser O (2020) A plant’s diet, surviving in a variable nutrient environment. Science 368:eaba0196
Pang J, Ryan MH, Lambers H, Siddique KH (2018) Phosphorus acquisition and utilisation in crop legumes under global change. Curr Opin Plant Biol 45:248–254
Png GK, Turner BL, Albornoz FE, Hayes PE, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2017) Greater root phosphatase activity in nitrogen-fixing rhizobial but not actinorhizal plants with declining phosphorus availability. J Ecol 105:1246–1255
Puga MI, Mateos I, Charukesi R, Wang Z, Franco-Zorrilla JM, de Lorenzo L, Irigoyen ML, Masiero S, Bustos R, Rodríguez J, Leyva A, Rubio V, Sommer H, Paz-Ares J (2014) SPX1 is a phosphate-dependent inhibitor of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:14947
Püschel D, Janoušková M, Voříšková A, Gryndlerová H, Vosátka M, Jansa J (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhiza stimulates biological nitrogen fixation in two Medicago spp. through improved phosphorus acquisition. Front Plant Sci 8:390
Qin L, Zhao J, Tian J, Chen L, Sun Z, Guo Y, Lu X, Gu M, Xu G, Liao H (2012) The high-affinity phosphate transporter GmPT5 regulates phosphate transport to nodules and nodulation in soybean. Plant Physiol 159:1634–1643
Raven JA (2012) Protein turnover and plant RNA and phosphorus requirements in relation to nitrogen fixation. Plant Sci 188-189:25–35
Ribet J, Drevon J-J (1996) The phosphorus requirement of N2-fixing and urea-fed Acacia mangium. New Phytol 132:383–390
Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2011) Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol 156:989–996
Rosas SB, Andrés JA, Rovera M, Correa NS (2006) Phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas putida can influence the rhizobia–legume symbiosis. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3502–3505
Rosendahl L, Vance CP, Pedersen WB (1990) Products of dark CO2 fixation in pea root nodules support bacteroid metabolism. Plant Physiol 93:12–19
Rosier A, Medeiros FHV, Bais HP (2018) Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions. Plant Soil 428:35–55
Ryan MH, Tibbett M, Edmonds-Tibbett T, Suriyagoda LDB, Lambers H, Cawthray GR, Pang J (2012) Carbon trading for phosphorus gain: the balance between rhizosphere carboxylates and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Cell Environ 35:2170–2180
Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T (2018) Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci 23:25–41
Schulze J (2004) How are nitrogen fixation rates regulated in legumes? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 167:125–137
Schulze J, Temple G, Temple SJ, Beschow H, Vance CP (2006) Nitrogen fixation by white lupin under phosphorus deficiency. Ann Bot 98:731–740
Shen JB, Bai Y, Wei Z, Chu C, Yuan L, Zhang L, Cui Z, Cong W, Zhang F (2021) Rhizobiont: an interdisciplinary innovation and perspective for harmonizing resources, environment, and food security. Acta Pedol Sin 58:1–11
Shi J, Zhao B, Zheng S, Zhang X, Wang X, Dong W, Xie Q, Wang G, Xiao Y, Chen F, Yu N, Wang E (2021) A phosphate starvation response-centered network regulates mycorrhizal symbiosis. Cell 184:5527–5540.e5518
Soloveichik G (2019) Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia as a potential alternative to the Haber–Bosch process. Nat Catal 2:377–380
Sprent JI, Geoghegan IE, Whitty PW, James EK (1996) Natural abundance of 15N and 13C in nodulated legumes and other plants in the cerrado and neighbouring regions of Brazil. Oecologia 105:440–446
Sulieman S, Tran L-SP (2015) Phosphorus homeostasis in legume nodules as an adaptive strategy to phosphorus deficiency. Plant Sci 239:36–43
Valentine AJ, Kleinert A, Benedito VA (2017) Adaptive strategies for nitrogen metabolism in phosphate deficient legume nodules. Plant Sci 256:46–52
Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15
Voigtlaender M, Laclau J-P, Gonçalves JLM, Piccolo MC, Moreira MZ, Nouvellon Y, Ranger J, Bouillet J-P (2012) Introducing Acacia mangium trees in Eucalyptus grandis plantations: consequences for soil organic matter stocks and nitrogen mineralization. Plant Soil 352:99–111
Wang Z, Ruan W, Shi J, Zhang L, Xiang D, Yang C, Li C, Wu Z, Liu Y, Yu Y, Shou H, Mo X, Mao C, Wu P (2014) Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:14953
Wang J, Si Z, Li F, Xiong X, Lei L, Xie F, Chen D, Li Y, Li Y (2015) A purple acid phosphatase plays a role in nodule formation and nitrogen fixation in Astragalus sinicus. Plant Mol Biol 88:515–529
Wang X, Ding W, Lambers H (2019) Nodulation promotes cluster-root formation in Lupinus albus under low phosphorus conditions. Plant Soil 439:233–242
Wang Y, Yang Z, Kong Y, Li X, Li W, Du H, Zhang C (2020) GmPAP12 is required for nodule development and nitrogen fixation under phosphorus starvation in soybean. Front Plant Sci 11:450
Wang X, Feng H, Wang Y, Wang M, Xie X, Chang H, Wang L, Qu J, Sun K, He W, Wang C, Dai C, Chu Z, Tian C, Yu N, Zhang X, Liu H, Wang E (2021a) Mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates the rhizosphere microbiota to promote rhizobia–legume symbiosis. Mol Plant 14:503–516
Wang Z, Kuo H-F, Chiou T-J (2021b) Intracellular phosphate sensing and regulation of phosphate transport systems in plants. Plant Physiol 187:2043–2055
Wasson AP, Pellerone FI, Mathesius U (2006) Silencing the flavonoid pathway in Medicago truncatula inhibits root nodule formation and prevents auxin transport regulation by rhizobia. Plant Cell 18:1617–1629
Wu P, Shou H, Xu G, Lian X (2013) Improvement of phosphorus efficiency in rice on the basis of understanding phosphate signaling and homeostasis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:205–212
Xu F, Liu Q, Chen L, Kuang J, Walk T, Wang J, Liao H (2013) Genome-wide identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets reveals their organ-specificity and responses to phosphate starvation. BMC Genomics 14:66
Xu L, Naylor D, Dong Z, Simmons T, Pierroz G, Hixson KK, Kim Y-M, Zink EM, Engbrecht KM, Wang Y, Gao C, DeGraaf S, Madera MA, Sievert JA, Hollingsworth J, Birdseye D, Scheller HV, Hutmacher R, Dahlberg J et al (2018) Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E4284
Xu L, Pierroz G, Wipf HML, Gao C, Taylor JW, Lemaux PG, Coleman-Derr D (2021) Holo-omics for deciphering plant-microbiome interactions. Microbiome 9:69
Xue Y-B, Xiao B-X, Zhu S-N, Mo X-H, Liang C-Y, Tian J, Liao H (2017) GmPHR25, a GmPHR member up-regulated by phosphate starvation, controls phosphate homeostasis in soybean. J Exp Bot 68:4951–4967
Yang Z, Gao Z, Zhou H, He Y, Liu Y, Lai Y, Zheng J, Li X, Liao H (2021a) GmPTF1 modifies root architecture responses to phosphate starvation primarily through regulating GmEXPB2 expression in soybean. Plant J 107:525–543
Yang Z, Zheng J, Zhou H, Chen S, Gao Z, Yang Y, Li X, Liao H (2021b) The soybean β-expansin gene GmINS1 contributes to nodule development in response to phosphate starvation. Physiol Plant 172:2034–2047
Yao Z, Tian J, Liao H (2014a) Comparative characterization of GmSPX members reveals that GmSPX3 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in soybean. Ann Bot 114:477–488
Yao Z-F, Liang C-Y, Zhang Q, Chen Z-J, Xiao B-X, Tian J, Liao H (2014b) SPX1 is an important component in the phosphorus signalling network of common bean regulating root growth and phosphorus homeostasis. J Exp Bot 65:3299–3310
Zaidi A, Khan MS, Rizvi A, Saif S, Ahmad B, Shahid M (2017) Role of phosphate-solubilizing Bacteria in legume improvement. In: Zaidi A, Khan MS, Musarrat J (eds) Microbes for legume improvement. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Zemunik G, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2015) Diversity of plant nutrient-acquisition strategies increases during long-term ecosystem development. Nature Plants 1:15050
Zhang J, Subramanian S, Stacey G, Yu O (2009) Flavones and flavonols play distinct critical roles during nodulation of Medicago truncatula by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant J 57:171–183
Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y (2015) Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51–59
Zhang D, Zhang C, Tang X, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Whalley WR, Davies WJ, Shen J (2016) Increased soil phosphorus availability induced by faba bean root exudation stimulates root growth and phosphorus uptake in neighbouring maize. New Phytol 209:823–831
Zhang J, Liu Y-X, Zhang N, Hu B, Jin T, Xu H, Qin Y, Yan P, Zhang X, Guo X, Hui J, Cao S, Wang X, Wang C, Wang H, Qu B, Fan G, Yuan L, Garrido-Oter R et al (2019) NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol 37:676–684
Zhong Y, Wang Y, Guo J, Zhu X, Shi J, He Q, Liu Y, Wu Y, Zhang L, Lv Q, Mao C (2018) Rice SPX6 negatively regulates the phosphate starvation response through suppression of the transcription factor PHR2. New Phytol 219:135–148
Zhuang Q, Xue Y, Yao Z, Zhu S, Liang C, Liao H, Tian J (2021) Phosphate starvation responsive GmSPX5 mediates nodule growth through interaction with GmNF-YC4 in soybean (Glycine max). Plant J 108:422–1438
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Emeritus Professor Hans Lambers for his insightful comments on this manuscript as well as for help with the writing. I would like to extend my thanks to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. Wenli Ding was supported by the International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (Talent-Introduction Program YJ20200203), which is co-funded by the Office of China Postdoc Council and China Agricultural University. Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102468) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021 M700165).
Funding
The study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102468) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021 M700165).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Wenli Ding wrote this manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Tim S. George.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, W. The promotion of legume nodulation in plant-soil-microbe systems under phosphorus-limited conditions. Plant Soil 476, 251–262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05564-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05564-5