Experimental studies have demonstrated that observation of motor actions induces activation in the observer of the same areas of the brain activated on physical execution of these actions and that this can induce the same plastic changes in the motor system of the observer as real physical training. This raises the question of whether observation of motor actions could be used to restore lost motor skills and acquire new skills. This review presents behavioral and neurophysiological data on the use of observation of motor actions in healthy people and in clinical conditions for rehabilitation (improvement) of movements.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
N. N. Lebedeva, A. I. Zufman, and V. Yu. Mal’tsev, “The mirror neuron system of the brain: the ley to learning, personality formation, and understanding the consciousness of other,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 48. No. 4, 16–28 (2017).
S. V. Murav’eva and Yu. E. Shelepin, “Recovery of impaired purposeful activity in patients with psychoneurological pathology by immersion into an interactive virtual environment,” in: Neurotechnology, Yu. E. Shelepin and V. N. Chikhman (eds.), VVM, St. Petersburg (2018), pp. 368–384.
M. A. Nazarova, M. A. Piradov, and L. A. Chernikova, “Visual feedback – mirror therapy in neurorehabilitation,” Ann. Klin. Eksperim. Nevrol., 6, No. 4, 36–41 (2012).
M. A. Nazarova and M. A. Piradov, “Mirror therapy in neurorehabilitation Ross. Med. Zh., 22, No. 22, 1563–1566 (2014).
V. I. Skvortsova, G. E. Ivanova, and D. V. Skvortsov, “A means of rehabilitating patients in the acute stage of stroke using biological feedback and virtual reality,” Patent RU 2432971 C1.10.11.2011.
Yu. K. Stolbkov, T. R. Moshonkina, I. V. Orlov, et al., “Imaginary movements as a means of improving and rehabilitating motor functions,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 49, No. 2, 45–59 (2018).
E. Yu. Shelepin, S. V. Murav’eva, E. G. Yakimova, and Yu. E. Shelepin, “Neurotechnology of the control of purposeful activity in humans in a virtual environment,” in: Neurotechnology, Yu. E. Shelepin and V. N. Chikhman (eds.), VVM, St. Petersburg (2018), pp. 349–367.
S. M. Aglioti and M. Pazzaglia, “Representing actions through their sound,” Exp. Brain Res., 206, 141–151 (2010).
Z. K. Agnew, R. J. Wise, and R. Leech, “Dissociating object directed and non-object directed action in the human mirror system; implications for theories of motor simulation,” PLoS One, No. 7, e32517 (2012).
K. Alaerts, S. P. Swinnen, and N. Wenderoth, “Interaction of sound and sight during action perception: evidence for shared modality dependent action representations,” Neuropsychologia, 47, 2593–2599 (2009).
M. Angelini, M. Fabbri-Destro, and N. F. Lopomo, et al., “Perspective-dependent reactivity of sensorimotor mu rhythm in alpha and beta ranges during action observation: an EEG study,” Sci. Rep., 8, No. 1: 12429, 1–11 (2018).
Apfelbaum H, Pelah A, and E. Peli, “Heading assessment by “tunnel vision” patients and control subjects standing or walking in a virtual reality environment,” ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 4, No. 1, Article 8, 1–16 (2007).
D. Apšvalka, E. S. Cross, and R. Ramsey, “Observing action sequences elicits sequence-specific neural representations in frontoparietal brain regions,” J. Neurosci., 38, No. 47, 10,114–10,128 (2018).
G. Barchiesi and L. Cattaneo, “Motor resonance meets motor performance,” Neuropsychology, 69, 93–104 (2015).
M. Bassolino, M. Campanella, M. Bove, et al., “Training the motor cortex by observing the actions of others during immobilization,” Cereb. Cortex, 24, No. 12, 3268–3276 (2014).
M. Bassolino, G. Sandini, and T. Pozzo, “Activating the motor system through action observation: is this an efficient approach in adults and children?” Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 57, Suppl. 2, 42–45 (2015).
G. Bellelli, G. Buccino, B. Bernardini, et al., “Action observation treatment improves recovery of postsurgical orthopedic patients: evidence for a top-down effect?” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 91, 1489– 1494 (2010).
A. Bisio, L. Avanzino, M. Biggio, et al., “Motor training and the combination of action observation and peripheral nerve stimulation reciprocally interfere with the plastic changes induced in primary motor cortex excitability,” Neuroscience, 348, 33–40 (2017).
A. Bisio, L. Avanzino, N. Gueugneau, et al., “Observing and perceiving: A combined approach to induce plasticity in human motor cortex,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 126, No. 6, 1212–20 (2015).
A. Bisio, M. Biggio, L. Avanzino, et al., “Kinaesthetic illusion shapes the cortical plasticity evoked by action observation,” J. Physiol., 597, No. 12, 3233–45 (2019).
L. R. Borges, A. B. Fernandes, L. P. Melo, et al., “Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke,” Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 10, CD011887 (2018).
M. Brass, H. Bekkering, A. Wohlschlaeger, and W. Prinz, “Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues,” Brain Cogn., 44, 124–143 (2000).
G. Buccino, “Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 369, No. 1644, 20130185 (2014).
G. Buccino, F. Binkofski, G. R. Fink, et al., “Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 13, 400–404 (2001).
G. Buccino, F. Binkofski, and L. Riggioa, “The mirror neuron system and action recognition,” Brain Lang., 89, No. 2, 370–376 (2004).
G. Buccino, A. Molinaro, C. Ambrosi, et al., “action observation treatment improves upper limb motor functions in children with cerebral palsy: A combined clinical and brain imaging study,” Neural Plast., 2018, 4843985 (2018).
G. Buccino, S. Vogt, A. Ritzl, et al., “Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study,” Neuron, 42, No. 2, 323–34 (2004).
V. Burzi, G. Tealdi, R. N. Boyd, and A. Guzzetta, “Action observation in infancy: implications for neuro-rehabilitation,” Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 58, Suppl. 4, 74–7 (2016).
V. Caggiano, M. Giese, P. Thier, and A. Casile, “Encoding of point of view during action observation in the local fi eld potentials of macaque area F5,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 41, No. 4, 466–76 (2015).
D. Caligiore, M. Mustile, G. Spalletta, and G. Baldassarre, “Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and an integrative hypothesis,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 72, 210 (2017).
B. Calvo-Merino, D. E. Glaser, J. Grezes, et al., “Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers,” Cereb. Cortex, 15, 1243–1249 (2005).
B. Calvo-Merino, J. Grezes, D. E. Glaser, et al., “Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation,” Curr. Biol., 16, 1905–1910 (2006).
C. Catmur, V. Walsh, and C. Heyes, “Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system,” Curr. Biol., 17, No. 17, 1527–1531 (2007).
L. Cattaneo, F. Caruana, A. Jezzini, and G. Rizzolatti, “Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study,” J. Neurosci., 29, No. 36, 11134–11138 (2009).
L. Cattaneo and G. Rizzolatti, “The mirror neuron system,” Arch. Neurol., 66, No. 5, 557–60 (2009).
M. C. Desy and J. F. Lepage, “Skin color has no impact on motor resonance: evidence from mu rhythm suppression and imitation,” Neurosci. Res., 77, No. 1, 58–63 (2013).
G. Di Pellegrino, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, et al., “Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study,” Exp. Brain Res., 91, 176–180 (1992).
J. Dushanova and J. Donoghue, “Neurons in primary motor cortex engaged during action observation,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 31, No. 2, 386–398 (2010).
A. Errante and L. Fogassi, “Parieto-frontal mechanisms underlying observation of complex hand-object manipulation,” Sci. Rep., 9, No. 1, 348 (2019).
D. Ertelt and F. Binkofski, “Action observation as a tool for neurorehabilitation to moderate motor deficits and aphasia following stroke,” Neural Regen. Res., 7, No. 26, 2063–2074 (2012).
P. F. Ferrari, S. Rozzi, and L. Fogassi, “Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 17, 212–226 (2005).
F. Filimon, C. A. Rieth, M. I. Sereno, and G. W. Cottrell, “Observed, executed, and imagined action representations can be decoded from ventral and dorsal areas,” Cereb. Cortex, 25, No. 9, 3144–3158 (2015).
L. Fogassi and G. Luppino, “Motor functions of the parietal lobe,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 15, No. 6, 626–31 (2005).
V. Gallese, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, and G. Rizzolatti, “Action recognition in the premotor cortex,” Brain, 119, 593–609 (1996).
V. Gallese and G. Lakoff, “The Brain’s concepts: the role of the sensorymotor system in conceptual knowledge,” Cogn. Neuropsychol., 22, No. 3, 455–479 (2005).
R. Gatti, M. A. Rocca, S. Fumagalli, et al., “The effect of action observation/ execution on mirror neuron system recruitment: an fMRI study in healthy individuals,” Brain Imag. Behav., 11, No. 2, 565–576 (2017).
R. Gatti, E. Sarasso, M. Pelachin, et al., “Can action observation modulate balance performance in healthy subjects?” Arch. Physiother., 22, No. 9, 1 (2019).
S. Ge, H. Liu, P. Lin, et al., “Neural basis of action observation and understanding from first- and third-person perspectives: An fMRI study,” Front. Behav. Neurosci., 12, 283 (2018).
B. M. Hager, A. C. Yang, and J. N. Gutsell, “Measuring brain complexity during neural motor resonance,” Front. Neurosci., 12:, 758 (2018).
D. J. Harris, S. J. Vine, M. R. Wilson, et al., “Action observation for sensorimotor learning in surgery,” Br. J. Surg, 105, No. 13, 1713– 1720 (2018).
J. Hyvärinen and Y. Shelepin, “Distribution of visual and somatic functions in the parietal associative area 7 of the monkey,” Brain Res., 169, No. 3, 561–4 (1979).
S. A. L. Jayasinghe, “The role of sensory stimulation on motor learning via action observation: a mini review,” J. Neurophysiol, 121, No. 3, 729–31 (2019).
M. Jeannerod, “Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition,” Neuroimage, 14, S103–S109 (2001).
E. Kohler, C. Keysers, M. A. Umilta, et al., “Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons,” Science, 297, No. 5582, 846–848 (2002).
A. Kraskov, N. Dancause, M. M. Quallo, et al., “Corticospinal neurons in macaque ventral premotor cortex with mirror properties: a potential mechanism for action suppression?” Neuron, 64, 922–930 (2009).
O. M. Lapenta, E. Ferrari, P. S. Boggio, et al., “Motor system recruitment during action observation: No correlation between mu-rhythm desynchronization and corticospinal excitability,” PLoS One, 13, No. 11, e0207476 (2018).
P. J. Marshall and A. N. Meltzoff, “Neural mirroring mechanisms and imitation in human infants,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 369, No. 1644, 20130620 (2014).
A. G. Mattar and P. L. Gribble, “Motor learning by observation,” Neuron, 46, 153–160 (2005).
L. M. McGarry, F. A. Russo, M. D. Schalles, and J. A. Pineda, “Audio-visual facilitation of mu rhythm,” Exp. Brain Res., 218, 527–38 (2012).
H. R. McGregor, J. G. A. Cashaback, and P. L. Gribble, “Somatosensory perceptual training enhances motor learning by observing,” J. Neurophysiol, 120, No. 6, 3017–3025 (2018).
R. Mukamel, A. D. Ekstrom, J. Kaplan, et al., “Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions,” Curr. Biol., 20, No. 8, 750–756 (2010).
T. Mulder, “Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation,” J. Neural Transm (Vienna), 114, No. 10, 1265–78 (2007).
K. R. Naish, B. Barnes, and S. S. Obhi, “Stimulation over primary motor cortex during action observation impairs effector recognition,” Cognition, 149, 84–94 (2016).
K. R. Naish, C. Houston-Price, A. J. Bremner, and N. P. Holmes, “Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response,” Neuropsychology, 64, 331–348 (2014).
K. R. Naish and S. S. Obhi, “Timing and specificity of early changes in motor excitability during movement observation,” Exp. Brain Res., 233, No. 6, 1867–1874 (2015).
R. Paracampo, M. Montemurro, M. de Vega, and A. Avenanti, “Primary motor cortex crucial for action prediction: A tDCS study,” Cortex, 109, 287–302 (2018).
M. Patel, “Action observation in the modification of postural sway and gait: Theory and use in rehabilitation,” Gait Posture, 58, 115–120 (2017).
R. Peeters, L. Simone, K. Nelissen, et al., “The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features,” J. Neurosci., 29, No. 37, 11523–11539 (2009).
K. A. Pelphrey, T. V. Mitchell, M. J. McKeown, et al., “Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: controlling for meaningful coherent motion,” J. Neurosci., 23, 6819–6825 (2003).
J. Plata Bello, C. Modrono, F. Marcano, and J. L. Gonzalez-Mora, “Observation of simple intransitive actions: the effect of familiarity,” PLoS One, 8, e74485 (2013).
V. Raos, M. N. Evangeliou, and H. E. Savaki, “Observation of action: grasping with the mind’s hand,” NeuroImage, 23, No. 1, 193–201 (2004).
V. Raos, M. N. Evangeliou, and H. E. Savaki, “Mental simulation of action in the service of action perception,” J. Neurosci., 27, No. 46, 12,675–12,683 (2007).
V. Raos, M. Kilintari, and H. E. Savaki, “Viewing a forelimb induces widespread cortical activations,” NeuroImage, 89, 122–142 (2014).
M. Riach, P. S. Holmes, Z. C. Franklin, and D. J. Wright, “Observation of an action with a congruent contextual background facilitates corticospinal excitability: A combined TMS and eye-tracking experiment,” Neuropsychology, 119, 157–164 (2018).
G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero, “The mirror-neuron system,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 27, 169–192 (2004).
G. Rizzolatti, M. Fabbri-Destro, and L. Cattaneo, “Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance,” Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol., 5, No. 1, 24–34 (2009).
G. Rizzolatti, L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, and L. Fogassi, “Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions,” Cogn. Brain Res., 3, 131–141 (1996).
G. Rizzolatti and S. Rozzi, “The mirror mechanism in the arietal lobe,”Handb. Clin. Neurol., 151, 555–573 (2018).
G. Rizzolatti and C. Sinigaglia, “The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 11, No. 4, 264–274 (2010).
G. Rizzolatti and C. Sinigaglia, “The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 17, No. 12, 757–765 (2016).
J. W. Roberts, S. J. Bennett, D. Elliott, and S. J. Hayes, “Top-down and bottom-up processes during observation: implications for motor learning,” Eur. J. Sport Sci., 14, Suppl. 1, S250–256 (2014).
Y. Rossetti, G. Rode, and G. H. J. Goldenberg, “Perspectives in higher-order motor deficits rehabilitation: which approach for which ecological result?” in: Higher-Order Motor Disorders from Neuroanatomy and Neurobiology to Clinical Neurology, H. J. Freund et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005); pp. 475–497.
E. Sarasso, M. Gemma, F. Agosta, et al., “Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review,” Arch. Physiother., 5, 14 (2015).
H. E. Savaki, “How do we understand the actions of others? By mental simulation, NOT mirroring,” Cogn. Critique, 2, 99–140 (2010).
S. Shimada, “Deactivation in the sensorimotor area during observation of a human agent performing robotic actions,” Brain Cogn., 72, No. 3, 394–399 (2010).
K. Stefan, L. G. Cohen, J. Duque, et al., “Formation of a motor memory by action observation,” J. Neurosci., 25, No. 41, 9339–9346 (2005).
G. Vigneswaran, R. Philipp, R. N. Lemon, and A. Kraskov, “M1 corticospinal mirror neurons and their role in movement suppression during action observation,” Curr. Biol., 23, No. 3, 236–243 (2013).
S. Vogt, G. Buccino, A. M. Wohlschläger, et al., “Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: effects of practice and expertise,” Neuroimage, 37, No. 4, 1371–1383 (2007).
X. Wang, W. W. Wong, and R. Sun, et al., “Differentiated effects of robot hand training with and without neural guidance on neuroplasticity patterns in chronic stroke,” Front. Neurol., 9, 810 (2018).
N. Wenderoth, “Changing the brain with multimodal mirrors: Combining visual and somatosensory stimulation to enhance motor plasticity,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 126, No. 6, 1065–1066 (2015).
T. Wiestler and J. Diedrichsen, “Skill learning strengthens cortical representations of motor sequences,” eLife, 2, e00801 (2013).
J. J. Q. Zhang, K. N. K. Fong, N. Welage, and K. P. Y. Liu, “The activation of the mirror neuron system during action observation and action execution with mirror visual feedback in stroke: A systematic review,” Neural Plast., 2018, 2321045.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Uspekhi Fiziologicheskikh Nauk, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 29–39, October–December, 2020.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stolbkov, Y.K., Gerasimenko, Y.P. Observation of Motor Actions as a Tool for Motor Rehabilitation. Neurosci Behav Physi 51, 1018–1026 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01160-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01160-9