Abstract
Aim
To retrospectively investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Methodology
Forty-six sequentially obtained isolates from 19 patients were subjected to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotyping, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotype PCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing.
Results
Majority of the isolates were Cryptococcus deneoformans (n = 29/46; 63%) followed by Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 16/46; 34.8%) and their interspecies hybrid (n = 1/46; 2.2%). Mating-type α was predominant, two mating-type a C. deneoformans isolates and one mating-type a/α isolate were observed. Several mixed infections were found by microsatellite typing; one patient had a persisting C. deneoformans infection for > 2.5 years. For C. deneoformans, the in vitro antifungal MIC90 and susceptibility ranges were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.031–0.25 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 0.25 µg/ml (0.063–4 µg/ml), fluconazole 8 µg/ml (0.5–16 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008–0.125 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008–0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031–0.125 µg/ml). For C. neoformans, these values were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.063–0.5 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 1 µg/ml (0.063–1 µg/ml), fluconazole 16 µg/ml (0.5–64 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.125 µg/ml (0.008–0.25 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008–0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031–0.125 µg/ml).
Conclusions
Majority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans; mating-type α was predominant. Several mixed infections were identified by AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing. Despite antifungal therapy, a cryptococcal isolate could persist for years. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent antifungal drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cryptococcosis is caused by members of the basidiomycetous yeast genus Cryptococcus, mainly by species that belongs to the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complexes [1, 2]. Cryptococcal infections became one of the major fungal culprits of disease with the onset of the HIV-pandemic, although the introduction of antiretroviral therapy has turned the tide, the number of infections remains high in less developed countries [2]. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis was estimated to be nearly 225,000 new infections each year mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, and a large number of these infected patients do not survive [3].
Cryptococcus neoformans sensu lato is globally the major cause of cryptococcal infection among immunosuppressed patients, while the sibling C. gattii sensu lato includes genotypes that are primarily observed among HIV-infected, while other genotypes have mostly been isolated from immunocompetent individuals [4, 5]. With the introduction of molecular techniques, such as PCR fingerprinting, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of PLB1 and URA5 genes, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprinting, multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing, it became apparent that C. gattii and C. neoformans were both species complexes [5, 6]. After more than 15 years of debate, the taxonomy of the C. gattii and C. neoformans species complex was revised [5, 7, 8]. The varieties of C. neoformans were raised to the species level, with C. neoformans (formerly C. neoformans var. grubii; serotype A; genotype AFLP1/VNI, AFLP1A/VNB/VNII, AFLP1B/VNII) and C. deneoformans (formerly C. neoformans var. neoformans; serotype D; genotype AFLP2/VNIV) [5]. The five genotypes within C. gattii sensu lato were all raised to the species level as C. gattii sensu stricto (serotype B; genotype AFLP4/VGI), C. bacillisporus (serotype C; genotype AFLP5/VGIII), C. deuterogattii (serotype B; genotype AFLP6/VGII), C. tetragattii (serotype C; genotype AFLP7/VGIV) and C. decagattii (serotype B; genotype AFLP10/VGIV) [5]. Several interspecies hybrids have been described; C. neoformans × C. deneoformans (serotype AD; genotype AFLP3/VNIII) is the most encountered hybrid, while hybrids between C. gattii sensu lato and C. neoformans sensu lato have been found to be a rarity [4, 5, 9–12].
Epidemiological surveys performed in Europe have observed that C. neoformans sensu stricto (serotype A) is the major cause of cryptococcal disease, but that C. deneoformans (serotype D) and C. neoformans × C. deneoformans hybrids are often found in patients and the environment of Mediterranean Europe [4, 13, 14]. Despite the large number of epidemiological studies, little is known about differences in host predilection and clinical differences between C. neoformans, C. deneoformans and their interspecies hybrids. Although the latter two seems to be more often involved in cutaneous and soft tissue infections, C. deneoformans is more frequently a cause of infection in the elderly [15].
As epidemiological data from Eastern Europe and the Balkan region are sparse, the aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Slovenia. For this purpose, cryptococcal isolates were molecularly characterized by using mating- and serotyping by qPCR’s; the genetic relatedness was assessed by AFLP fingerprinting and microsatellite typing; and antifungal susceptibility testing was performed and included amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole.
Materials and Methods
Patients, Isolates and Media
Forty-six cryptococcal isolates were collected during the period of October 1998–April 2016 and involved 19 Slovenian patients (Fig. 1). From ten patients, one culture was obtained; from five patients, two isolates were cultured; four, six, seven and nine isolates were obtained each from one patient (Fig. 1). Patients were between 14 and 85 years old, with a median age of 44, 63.2% (n = 12) were male and 36.8% (n = 7) were female. Patients had different underlying diseases, with HIV infection being the most common (n = 8, 42.1%), followed by kidney transplant (n = 3, 15.8%), non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; n = 2, 10.5%), lymphoma (n = 1, 5.3%), sepsis (n = 1, 5.3%), pneumonia (n = 1, 5.3%), ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; n = 1, 5.3%) and cystic fibrosis (n = 1, 5.3%). One female patient had a combination of breast cancer, diabetes mellitus type 2, polymyalgia rheumatica and NSTEMI, which accounts for 5.3% (n = 1) of our patient population. All, except two, patients were regarded as having one episode of cryptococcal infection (range 1–135 days). One episode of disease was defined by having at least one positive culture; > 1 episode was defined as having two positive cultures with an interval ≥ 1 year. One patient had two episodes that were separated by 2.5 years; another patient had two episodes that were diagnosed 1.3 years after each other (Fig. 1).
Cryptococcal isolates were cultured from CSF (n = 19; 41.3%), blood culture (n = 15; 32.6%), sputum (n = 3; 6.5%), wound swab (n = 3; 6.5%), bronchial alveolar lavage (n = 2; 4.3%), skin biopsy (n = 2; 4.3%), tracheal aspirate (n = 1, 2.2%) and urine (n = 1, 2.2%).
Primary clinical specimens and positive blood cultures were plated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenicol and gentamycin (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and chromogenic medium CHROMagar Candida (Mast Diagnostica, Reinfeld, Germany). Plates were incubated at 37 °C. Isolates were identified biochemically using ID 32C strips according to manufacturer’s instructions (BioMérieux). Colonies suggestive for Cryptococcus species were subjected to ethanol–formiate extraction for identification with the MALDI-TOF Biotyper system, version 3.1, according to manufacturer’s instructions (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). Isolates were cultured onto Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated for 48 h at 30 °C. Stock cultures were kept at −80 °C for which the Microbank system was used (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada).
The isolates were deposited in the culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands, with the accession numbers CBS15077-CBS15103, CBS15110-CBS15127 and CBS15149.
Extraction of Genomic DNA
A loopfull of cryptococcal cells were harvested from 48-h old cultures and suspended into Green Beads tubes that contain 300 µl bacterial lysis buffer followed by bead beating with a MagNA Lyser (all Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands). After 2-min centrifugation at 14,000 rpm, the cell lysates were heat-inactivated by 100 °C for 10 min, and after cooling to room temperature 200 µl of the cell lysate was used as input for automatic genomic DNA extraction on a MagNA Pure 96 platform (Roche Diagnostics) for which the Pathogen Detection 200 protocol was used with a final elution volume of 100 µl. Genomic DNA samples were stored at −20 °C upon further use.
Molecular Characterization by AFLP, qPCR’s and Microsatellite Typing
Genotypic characterization was performed by AFLP fingerprinting, as described previously, by using the restriction enzymes EcoR1 and MseI during the enzymatic reaction and the selective primers EcoR1-AC (fluorescently labelled with fluorescein at the 5′-side) and MseI-G for the AFLP-PCR [16, 17]. The reference strains for C. neoformans (CBS10512 and CBS10515, genotype AFLP1/VNI; Bt1, genotype AFLP1A/VNB/VNII; WM626, genotype AFLP1B/VNII), C. deneoformans (CBS10511 and CBS10513, genotype AFLP2/VNIV), C. neoformans × C. deneoformans hybrid (CBS132, genotype AFLP3/VNIII), C. gattii sensu stricto (WM179, genotype AFLP4/VGI), C. bacillisporus (WM161, genotype AFLP5/VGIII), C. deuterogattii (WM178, genotype AFLP6/VGII), C. tetragattii (CBS10101, genotype AFLP7/VGIV), C. decagattii (IHEM14941, genotype AFLP10/VGIV), C. gattii sensu stricto × C. deneoformans (CBS10488, genotype AFLP8) and C. gattii sensu stricto × C. neoformans (CBS10496, genotype AFLP9) were included as controls to assign the appropriate species and genotype. Fragment analysis was performed on an ABI3500xL Genetic Analyser according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.); for this purpose, 1 µl 10 × diluted AFLP-PCR product was added to a mixture of 8.9 µl ddH2O and 0.1 µl LIZ600 internal size marker (Applied Biosystems) and boiled for 1 min at 100 °C followed by cooling to 4 °C. Raw data were analysed with BioNumerics v7.5 (Applied Maths, St. Martem-Latum, Belgium), and fingerprints were compared by using UPGMA clustering after a matrix has been created with the similarity coefficient curve-based Pearson correlation.
The mating- and serotype of the isolates were determined by two previously described multiplex qPCRs that target a part of the RUM1 gene, one qPCR specific for the mating-type a allele and the other for the mating-type α allele, while two hydrolysis probes specifically target C. neoformans (serotype A) and C. deneoformans (serotype D) [18]. The reference strains for C. neoformans (serotype A; CBS10512, mating-type a; CBS10515, mating-type α) and C. deneoformans (serotype D; CBS10511, mating-type a; CBS10513, mating-type α) were included as controls.
Microsatellite typing was performed to investigate the genetic relatedness of isolates that have a similar AFLP genotype; isolates that belong to C. neoformans (including hybrids) were subjected to a C. neoformans-specific microsatellite panel that includes nine loci [19]. Isolates that were observed to be C. deneoformans (including hybrids) were subjected to a C. deneoformans-specific microsatellite panel that consists of seven loci [20]. Multiplex PCRs were performed as described before [19, 20]. Fragment analysis was performed in a similar approach as described above for AFLP fingerprinting; briefly, 1 µl of 100 × diluted multiplex PCR product was added to a mixture of 8.9 µl ddH2O and 0.1 µl CC-ROX500 internal size marker (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) and boiled for 1 min at 100 °C followed by cooling to 4 °C. Subsequently, the microsatellite fragments were determined on an ABI3500xL Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems); according to the manufacturer’s instructions, raw data were imported into GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems) and microsatellite repeat numbers were assigned. The microsatellite profiles, containing either nine or seven numbers for the C. neoformans and C. deneoformans panels, respectively, were imported into BioNumerics v7.5 (Applied Maths).
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
Susceptibility testing of all 46 isolates was performed with the Micronaut-AM Antifungal Agents MIC broth microdilution (Merlin Diagnostika, Bornheim-Hersel, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The test plates contain serial twofold dilutions of amphotericin B (AMB; 0.03–16 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine (5FC; 0.06–32 µg/ml), fluconazole (FLZ; 0.002–128 µg/ml), voriconazole (VCZ; 0.008–8.0 µg/ml), posaconazole (PCZ; 0.008–8 µg/ml), itraconazole (ITZ; 0.03–4 µg/ml), micafungin (0.002–8 µg/ml), anidulafungin (0.002–8 µg/ml) and caspofungin (0.002–8 µg/ml). The latter three compounds are not effective against Cryptococcus species and are not further interpreted. In brief, isolates were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar (BioMérieux) at 37 °C for 48 h. Isolate suspensions were prepared in 0.9% NaCl and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard. A 20-fold dilution was prepared in 0.9% NaCl, and a fivefold dilution was prepared in 11 mL of RPMI broth (Merlin Diagnostika) supplemented with 50 µL AST indicator. The test plates were then inoculated with 100 µL/well of suspension in RPMI broth and incubated at 30 °C for 48–72 h. Test results were determined by a photometric reading using Micronaut Software (Merlin Diagnostika). The reference strains Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality controls.
Results
Molecular Characterization
Two major groups were identified by AFLP fingerprinting; the largest one was formed by C. deneoformans (AFLP2/VNIV) that includes 29 isolates (63%); 16 isolates (34.8%) clustered with the C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) reference strain, and one isolate (2.2%) was found to be a hybrid between C. neoformans × C. deneoformans (AFLP3/VNIII) (Fig. 1).
Mating- and serotyping by qPCR showed that all C. neoformans isolates were mating-type α and serotype A; all C. deneoformans isolates were serotype D, and 27 of these were found to be mating-type α and two were mating-type a. The interspecies hybrid was found to be mating-type α serotype A and mating-type a serotype D (Fig. 1).
By microsatellite typing, 13 genotypes could be identified within the group of 29 C. deneoformans and the single serotype AD hybrid, while 9 microsatellite genotypes were observed among the 16 C. neoformans and the single serotype AD isolate (Fig. 1).
When taking the patient data into account, some interesting observations were made. Of the five patients from which 2 isolates were available, patient KA was found to be infected with C. deneoformans and the hybrid C. neoformans × C. deneoformans. The C. deneoformans genetic background of the latter differs from that of the former when considering the microsatellite profiles (Fig. 1). From patient PJ, four isolates were available; three of them were C. neoformans from blood cultures and BAL with an identical microsatellite profile, while the fourth was a C. deneoformans isolate from a blood culture. All isolates from this patient were collected within an 8-day period indicating a mixed cryptococcal infection (Fig. 1). From patient CM, six C. neoformans isolates were collected from CSF and blood cultures during a 3-week period; all isolates had a similar microsatellite profile, but were found to have minor differences in the AFLP fingerprints (Fig. 1). Seven isolates were available from patient VH and were collected during a 5-day period. During this period, two C. deneoformans microsatellite profiles were found, but these differences were found to be minor as only two of the seven loci had a one repeat unit difference (Fig. 1). Patient SM experienced multiple episodes of a C. deneoformans infection; the eight isolates from the first episode could be split into two major microsatellite profiles with six isolates that fell in one group and two isolates that belong to the second group which had only a one repeat unit difference for one out of seven microsatellite loci (Fig. 1). The ninth isolate from patient SM was obtained more than 2 years after the first episode; this isolate was found to be closely related to the isolates involved in the first episode as two of the seven microsatellite loci had a one repeat unit difference (Fig. 1).
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing
The MIC ranges, MIC50, MIC90 and geometric mean MICs of six antifungal drugs are presented in Table 1. Susceptibility data are presented for C. neoformans AFLP1/VNI (n = 16), C. deneoformans AFLP2/VNIV (n = 29) and the serotype AD hybrid AFLP3/VNIII (n = 1). The overall MIC ranges for each of six antifungal drugs were 0.031–0.5 µg/ml for amphotericin B, 0.063–4 µg/ml for 5-fluorocytosine, 0.5–64 µg/ml for fluconazole, 0.008–0.25 µg/ml for voriconazole, 0.008–0.063 µg/ml for posaconazole and 0.008–0.25 µg/ml for itraconazole. Fluconazole and 5-fluorocytosine had the highest geometric mean MICs of 4.06 and 0.35 µg/ml, respectively, while voriconazole and posaconazole had the lowest geometric MICs with 0.03 and 0.02 µg/ml, respectively. Amphotericin B and itraconazole fall in between with 0.17 and 0.04 µg/ml, respectively. The highest MIC values were observed for one C. neoformans AFLP1/VNI isolate from cerebrospinal fluid of an HIV-infected patient with an MIC of 64 µg/ml for fluconazole and three C. deneoformans AFLP2/VNIV isolates from cerebrospinal fluid of a single HIV-infected patient with an MIC of 4.0 µg/ml for 5-fluorocytosine (Tables 1, 2).
Discussion
The epidemiology of cryptococcal infections in Slovenia during the period 1998–2016 was retrospectively investigated by AFLP fingerprinting, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotyping by qPCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing that included amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole.
The majority of the cryptococcal isolates were observed to be C. deneoformans (serotype D; genotype AFLP2/VNIV) that was represented by 63% (n = 29/46) isolates, followed by C. neoformans (serotype A; genotype AFLP1/VNI) with 34.8% (n = 16/46) and one isolate that was a hybrid between both species (serotype AD; genotype AFLP3/VNIII). Cryptococcus deneoformans remained the major culprit when the number of isolates per patient was ‘clone corrected’, as 11 patients were infected by this cryptococcal species. Eight patients had a C. neoformans infection, and one patient was infected with a serotype AD hybrid isolate (Fig. 1). It is known from epidemiological studies that the number of C. deneoformans and C. neoformans × C. deneoformans isolates is relatively higher around the Mediterranean basin compared to other geographical regions [13, 14]. But so far, there are only few studies, notably from the neighbouring countries Croatia and Italy, that reported equal numbers of clinical C. neoformans and C. deneoformans isolates (n Croatia = 6 for both; n Italy = 45 for both) [14, 21]. Although the number of cryptococcal infections is low in Slovenia, with an incidence of 20 episodes during the period October 1998–April 2016 resulting in 1.14 infections per year in a population of ~ 2 million inhabitants, it is remarkable that the number of C. neoformans is much lower compared to what has been observed in other epidemiological studies from the Mediterranean basin.
The mating- and serotypes were determined by qPCR, which showed no discrepancies between the determined serotypes versus the observed genotypes. Remarkably, nearly all isolates were mating-type α (n = 43/46; 93.5%), two C. deneoformans isolates from one patient were mating-type a, and one isolate was found to be a hybrid αA-aD (Fig. 1). The phenomenon that mating-type α harbouring isolates are overrepresented among clinical samples seems to points towards a higher virulence potential for these isolates, as was several decades ago postulated by Kwon-Chung and co-workers [22]. However, genetic studies revealed that mating-type a and α congenic isolates had equivalent virulence potential, but that the parental mating-type α isolate was more virulent compared to the mating-type a parental, suggestive for the presence of other genetic markers outside the mating-type locus that influence cryptococcal virulence [23]. Mating-type α isolates were found to have an enhanced predilection to penetrate the central nervous system, compared to its mating-type a counterpart, which might explain the higher incidence of the former in cryptococcal infections [24]. A recent European environmental survey observed mating-type distributions similar to those from the current study, with mating-type α versus mating-type a isolates of 327 versus 6 for C. neoformans and 78 versus 29 for C. deneoformans isolates [13].
In the current study, we observed that several patients had a persisting infection or a infection with multiple Cryptococcus isolates or species. Infections with multiple Cryptococcus species have been described before, commonly C. neoformans with C. deneoformans and/or its interspecies hybrids [25, 26], but also a mixed C. neoformans/C. deuterogattii infection was described [27]. Infections with multiple isolates that have different genotypes were observed, mostly for C. neoformans [26, 28–32]. As in the current study, microsatellite typing has been a valuable molecular technique to differentiate the involved C. neoformans isolates [28, 30, 31]; also, sequenced-based methods have been applied to study mixed and recurrent infections [25, 33]. It has been postulated that interspecies hybrid can be generated in vivo [25], but the single patient in the current cohort had isolates with different C. deneoformans genetic backgrounds (Fig. 1). One Slovenian patient experienced two episodes of cryptococcal infection; here, microsatellite typing showed that the initial isolate underwent microevolution as only few microsatellite markers differ one repeat unit (Fig. 1; Table 2). Microevolution of isolates involved in persistent infections may result in attenuated phenotypic properties, such as a decreased antifungal susceptibility [26, 28–32, 34]. However, the isolate from patient CM obtained from the second episode did not differ in its antifungal susceptibility compared to isolates that were obtained in the early phase of the first episode (Table 2).
According to antifungal susceptibility testing, the most potent antifungal drugs are voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole with MICs ≤ 0.125 µg/ml (Table 1). These drugs exhibit the lowest MIC50 in all three genotypes, generally being 1–2 dilution steps lower than reported in other studies [18, 20, 21]. By applying the genotype-specific epidemiologic cut-off values (ECV) proposed by Espinel-Ingroff and co-workers [35], these cryptococcal isolates probably do not possess acquired resistance mechanisms for these three triazoles. Amphotericin B also exhibits good in vitro activity with MICs ≤ 0.25 µg/ml, and similar to the Dutch study C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) has one dilution step higher MIC50 than C. deneoformans (AFLP2/VNIV) with values of 0.25 µg/ml versus 0.125 µg/ml, respectively [20]. Compared to other tested triazoles, fluconazole exhibits higher MICs with 89.1% (n = 41/46) C. neoformans sensu lato isolates having MICs ≥ 8.0 µg/ml. MIC50 values for C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) and C. deneoformans (AFLP2/VNIV) are 8.0 µg/ml and 4.0 µg/ml, respectively. MIC50 values for fluconazole are generally 1–2 dilution step higher than observed in other studies [18, 20, 21], but we also observed that C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) has higher MIC50’s than C. deneoformans (AFLP2/VNIV), a similar trend as reported in other studies [5, 18, 20, 21, 35]. When ECVs are applied, 10.9% of all cryptococcal isolates express reduced susceptibility to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 16 µg/ml) [35, 36]. The majority (80.0%; n = 4/5) of these potentially resistant isolates belong to C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) and came from three different patients: one of these isolates with MIC 16 µg/ml came from a tracheal aspirate from a patient with NSTEMI and was not considered as cryptococcosis, and the other three isolates came from HIV-positive patients. One of these two patients had cryptococcemia caused by both species: C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI) and C. deneoformans (AFLP2/VNIV), with MIC 16 µg/ml; the patient died during treatment with amphotericin B plus fluconazole. The other HIV-positive patient (CM) had cryptococcal meningoencephalitis caused by C. neoformans (AFLP1/VNI), and in the period of three weeks MICs of fluconazole went from 4.0 to 64 µg/ml, which may indicate acquired resistance mechanisms (Table 2). This is the only case in which we observed a transition from wildtype to non-wildtype during the course of the infection. There were two other patients that had several isolates: VH had seven C. deneoformans isolates in five days with MICs for fluconazole varying from 1.0 to 8.0 µg/ml, still in the wildtype range, and patient SM with the largest number of isolates (all C. deneoformans) that were isolated during July 2013 to January 2016 with MICs for fluconazole varying from 2.0 µg/ml to 8.0 µg/ml with no non-wildtypes observed.
In summary, in Slovenia 19 cases of cryptococcosis were reported during the study period of October 1998–April 2016. The majority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans, followed by C. neoformans and the interspecies hybrids between the two species. Nearly, all isolates were found to be mating-type α, with the exception of three isolates that had the mating-type a allele. By AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing, it was observed that several patients had a mixed cryptococcal infection, but also that a cryptococcal isolate can persist for years. Antifungal susceptibility testing showed that voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent drugs with MICs ≤ 0.125 µg/ml. Overall, C. neoformans was found to have higher MIC50’s than C. deneoformans.
References
Fonseca Á, Boekhout T, Fell JW. Cryptococcus. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. The yeasts—a taxonomic study, vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2011. p. 1661–17347 (Chapter 138).
La Hoz RM, Pappas PG. Cryptococcal infections: changing epidemiology and implications for therapy. Drugs. 2013;73:495–504. doi:10.1007/s40265-013-0037-z.
Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:873–81. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30243-8.
Cogliati M. Global molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii: an atlas of the molecular types. Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:675213. doi:10.1155/2013/675213.
Hagen F, Khayhan K, Theelen B, Kolecka A, Polacheck I, et al. Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;78:16–48. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.009.
Meyer W, Aanensen DM, Boekhout T, Cogliati M, Diaz MR, et al. Consensus multi-locus sequence typing scheme for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Med Mycol. 2009;47:561–70. doi:10.1080/13693780902953886.
Hagen F, Lumbsch HT, Arsic Arsenijevic V, Badali H, Bertout S et al. The importance of resolving fungal nomenclature: the case of the multiple pathogenic species in the genus Cryptococcus. mSphere. 2017;2 (in press).
Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE, Wickes BL, Meyer W, Cuomo CA, et al. The case for adopting the “species complex” nomenclature for the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. mSphere. 2017;2:e00357-16. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00357-16.
Aminnejad M, Diaz M, Arabatzis M, Castañeda E, Lazera M, et al. Identification of novel hybrids between Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii VNI and Cryptococcus gattii VGII. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:337–46. doi:10.1007/s11046-011-9491-x.
Bovers M, Hagen F, Kuramae EE, Diaz MR, Spanjaard L, et al. Unique hybrids between the fungal pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:599–607. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00082.x.
Bovers M, Hagen F, Kuramae EE, Hoogveld HL, Dromer F, et al. AIDS patient death caused by novel Cryptococcus neoformans × C. gattii hybrid. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1105–8. doi:10.3201/eid1407.080122.
Hagen F, Hare Jensen R, Meis JF, Arendrup MC. Molecular epidemiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of 108 clinical Cryptococcus neoformans sensu lato and Cryptococcus gattii sensu lato isolates from Denmark. Mycoses. 2016;59:576–84. doi:10.1111/myc.12507.
Cogliati M, D’Amicis R, Zani A, Montagna MT, Caggiano G, et al. Environmental distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii around the Mediterranean basin. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16:fow045. doi:10.1093/femsyr/fow045.
Viviani MA, Cogliati M, Esposto MC, Lemmer K, Tintelnot K, et al. Molecular analysis of 311 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from a 30-month ECMM survey of cryptococcosis in Europe. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:614–9. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00081.x.
Dromer F, Mathoulin S, Dupont B, Letenneur L, Ronin O. Individual and environmental factors associated with infection due to Cryptococcus neoformans serotype D. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:91–6.
Boekhout T, Theelen B, Diaz M, Fell JW, Hop WC, et al. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology. 2001;147:891–907. doi:10.1099/00221287-147-4-891.
Nyazika TK, Hagen F, Meis JF, Robertson VJ. Cryptococcus tetragattii as a major cause of cryptococcal meningitis among HIV-infected individuals in Harare, Zimbabwe. J Infect. 2016;72:745–52. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2016.02.018.
Arsic Arsenijevic V, Pekmezovic MG, Meis JF, Hagen F. Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Serbian Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Mycoses. 2014;57:380–7. doi:10.1111/myc.12171.
Illnait-Zaragozí MT, Martínez-Machín GF, Fernández-Andreu CM, Boekhout T, Meis JF, et al. Microsatellite typing of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii isolates from Cuba shows multiple genetic lineages. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9124. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009124.
Hagen F, Illnait-Zaragozí MT, Meis JF, Chew WH, Curfs-Breuker I, et al. Extensive genetic diversity within the Dutch clinical Cryptococcus neoformans population. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1918–26. doi:10.1128/JCM.06750-11.
Mlinaric-Missoni E, Hagen F, Chew WH, Vazic-Babic V, Boekhout T, et al. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities and molecular typing of sequentially isolated clinical Cryptococcus neoformans strains from Croatia. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1487–95. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.031344-0.
Kwon-Chung KJ, Edman JC, Wickes BL. Genetic association of mating types and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 1992;60:602–5.
Nielsen K, Marra RE, Hagen F, Boekhout T, Mitchell TG, et al. Interaction between genetic background and the mating-type locus in Cryptococcus neoformans virulence potential. Genetics. 2005;171:975–83.
Nielsen K, Cox GM, Litvintseva AP, Mylonakis E, Malliaris SD, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans alpha strains preferentially disseminate to the central nervous system during coinfection. Infect Immun. 2005;73:4922–33. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.8.4922-4933.2005.
Desnos-Ollivier M, Patel S, Spaulding AR, Charlier C, Garcia-Hermoso D, Nielsen K, Dromer F. Mixed infections and in vivo evolution in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. mBio. 2010;1. pii: e00091-10. doi:10.1128/mBio.00091-10.
Gago S, Serrano C, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuesta I, Martín-Mazuelos E, et al. Molecular identification, antifungal resistance and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus deneoformans isolated in Seville, Spain. Mycoses. 2017;60:40–50. doi:10.1111/myc.12543.
Kassi FK, Bellet V, Doumbia A, Krasteva D, Drakulovski P, et al. First case of mixed infection with Cryptococcus deuterogattii and Cryptococcus neoformans VNI in an Ivorian HIV-positive patient. JMM Case Rep. 2016;3:e005037. doi:10.1099/jmmcr.0.005037.
Bertout S, Drakulovski P, Kouanfack C, Krasteva D, Ngouana T, et al. Genotyping and antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Cameroonian HIV-positive adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:763–9. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12019.
Fries BC, Casadevall A. Serial isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans from patients with AIDS differ in virulence for mice. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(6):1761–6.
Illnait-Zaragozí MT, Martínez-Machín GF, Fernández-Andreu CM, Hagen F, Boekhout T, et al. Microsatellite typing and susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Cuban patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:289. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-289.
Kammalac Ngouana T, Drakulovski P, Krasteva D, Kouanfack C, Reynes J, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Yaoundé human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients exhibited intra-individual genetic diversity and variation in antifungal susceptibility profiles between isolates from the same patient. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:579–89. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.000265.
Mandal P, Banerjee U, Casadevall A, Nosanchuk JD. Dual infections with pigmented and albino strains of Cryptococcus neoformans in patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection in India. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:4766–72.
Rhodes J, Beale MA, Vanhove M, Jarvis JN, Kannambath S, Simpson JA, Ryan A, Meintjes G, Harrison TS, Fisher MC, Bicanic T. A population genomics approach to assessing the genetic basis of within-host microevolution underlying recurrent cryptococcal meningitis infection. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7:1165–76. doi:10.1534/g3.116.037499.
Casadevall A, Spitzer ED, Webb D, Rinaldi MG. Susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis to amphotericin B and fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1383–6.
Espinel-Ingroff A, Aller AI, Canton E, Castañón-Olivares LR, Chowdhary A, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:5898–906. doi:10.1128/AAC.01115-12.
Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Jones RN. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiologic cutoff values for fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole when testing Cryptococcus neoformans as determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;71:252–9. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.07.007.
Acknowledgements
The research visit of Rok Tomazin to the Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital was supported with an ESCMID Observership (Grant Number 516).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
JF.M received grants from Astellas, Basilea, F2G and Merck. He has been a consultant to Astellas, Basilea and Merck and received speaker’s fees from Merck, Gilead and United Medical.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomazin, R., Matos, T., Meis, J.F. et al. Molecular Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Sequentially Obtained Clinical Cryptococcus deneoformans and Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates from Ljubljana, Slovenia. Mycopathologia 183, 371–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-017-0214-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-017-0214-9