Abstract
Matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP-2) and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) are involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix in normal physiological processes as well as in disease processes, such as cancer metastasis. We conducted this work to study the role of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in breast cancer by measuring their plasma concentrations before and after surgery. Also, to examine if their levels can reflect the stage of disease and prognosis. Forty-eight breast cancer patients and 13 patients with benign breast diseases were included in the study. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were measured by ELISA and semi-quantitative real-time PCR. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels in plasma were determined by ELISA immediately before surgery and during 6 to 12 months after curative surgery. We observed a significant increase in the level of MMP-9 mRNA expression in breast cancer patients in comparison to their normal breast tissues and to tissues of benign breast disease. In all TNM tumor stages, the plasma levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were increased significantly before curative surgery in the studied patients with breast carcinoma and decreased significantly after surgery. Both MMP-2 and MMP-9 may be used as a possible marker for follow-up or as a marker that reflects the response of the disease to treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In Egypt and worldwide, the most common cancer in females is breast. The majority of patients in developed countries came with locally advanced or metastatic disease [1].
In malignant tumors, distant metastasis to vital organs and sites is the main cause of death. The female breast is very rich in lymphatic and venous drainage leading to early and distant spread of breast cancer with their associated high rates of death [2]. The malignant tumors invade the basement membrane to reach the lymphatic and blood vessels after crossing the extracellular matrix (ECM) [3]. Cancer cell invasion is prevented by ECM which maintains tissue architecture and polarity [4].
The vacuolar‐H+‐ATPase (V‐ATPase) is one of the main regulators of pH in the tumor cells and its positivity leads to invasion and metastasis of malignant cells [5]. Hydrolysis of ATP releases energy that pumps the protons into the extracellular environment and enhances V-ATPase activation. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which remodel the ECM by enhancement of proteolytic enzyme, is activated by the low PH of the malignant tumor microenvironment. This activation leads to proteolysis of the basement membrane and spread of malignant cells into the circulation and distant metastases [6]. Matrix metalloproteinase, MMP-2 and MMP-9 promotes malignant tumor spread and metastases [7]. In many types of malignant tumors, an association between poor tumor differentiation, advanced tumor stage, bad prognosis, and the increased levels of Matrix metalloproteinase, MMP-2 and MMP-9 [8,9,10,11].
The present study was conducted to assess the role of MMP-9 and MMP-2 in breast cancer patients. Their role was studied by quantification of plasma levels by ELISA, tumor and adjacent normal tissues mRNA level by real time PCR. Changes in expression levels of studied metalloproteinases before and after tumor resection were also studied. Also, to examine if their levels can reflect the stage of disease and prognosis.
Patients and methods
Characteristics of patients
The study was carried out between May 2015 and June 2017 at Breast Clinic, Clinical Oncology Department, Zagazig University Hospitals. Forty-eight patients with breast carcinoma who underwent a radical or breast conservation resection were included in the study (aged 27–65 years; mean, 46.0 years), 13 patients with benign breast diseases (fibroadenosis and fibroadenomas) (aged 22–53 years; mean, 42.0 years) who underwent surgical excision. Patient’s distribution according to TNM staging system [12] is shown in Table 1. Twenty-five healthy subjects of patients’ relatives were selected for control blood samples.
All participants give informed consent prior to enrolment to the trial. Ethical approval was obtained from Zagazig University ethical committee.
Specimen collection
During the surgical procedure, tissue samples were taken from breast cancer and other biopsies from surrounding tissues not involved by the tumor as a control. Meanwhile, a tissue sample was taken from the lesion in the 13 patients with benign breast conditions either by excision biopsy or by core biopsy.
Tissues taken were immediately frozen by liquid nitrogen and preserved at − 70 °C till the time of the study. A 3 ml blood specimen was also taken at the time of operation from each patient. A 3 ml blood specimen was taken also from 25 healthy subjects of patients’ relatives as controls.
Blood was collected in heparinized tubes and centrifuged. The supernatant fluid was taken and kept in a refrigerator at − 20 °C till the time of analysis.
Tissue homogenate: the homogenate is prepared by rinsing the tissue sample with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to remove excess blood and then the tissue was weighed and minced into small pieces and homogenized in 5–10 ml PBS and extraction buffer in the homogenizer. The sample was placed on the shaker at 4°C for 1 h then centrifuge the sample at approximately 10,000×g for 5 min the supernatant was removed and assayed immediately or aliquots were kept at − 80 °C until analysis.
Extraction of RNA from tissue samples
Total RNA was extracted from frozen specimens using the isolation kit provided by Promega according to their protocol (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA).
Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR)
The reaction was done using GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System supplied by Promega (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The cDNA synthesis was carried out briefly as follow: 3 μg of total RNA was mixed with Oligo dT15 primers and Nuclease-Free Water at 65 °C for 5 min then the tube was placed in iced water at least for 10 min and centrifuged. After centrifugation, the following mixture (GoScriptTM 5 × Reaction Buffer, 0.5 mM of PCR Nucleotide Mix, 2–5 mM of MgCl2, RNasin® Ribonuclease Inhibitor, GoScriptTM Reverse Transcriptase, and Nuclease-Free Water) was added, and the tube was placed in a thermal cycler for 5 min at 25 °C, followed by 60 min at 42 °C. The reaction was then terminated by heating for 5 min at 70 °C. The cDNA was stored at − 20 °C until the qRT-PCR analysis.
The synthesized cDNA may be added directly to PCR amplification, In each PCR reaction the following PCR mix was used: 10 × Buffer 5 μl, MgCl2 25 mM 4 μl, dNTPs* 4 μl, Primer 1 50 μM 1 μl, Primer 2 50 μM 1 μl, Taq 5 μ/μl 0.4 μl, cDNA 1 μl and H2O to 50 μl (dNTPs* composed of: 2 mM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP; 1.98 mM dTTP; 0.02 mM DIG-dUTP).
The following primers were used for MMP-2 and MMP-9 genes
MMP-2: Forward: 5′‐CTAGACTGCTACCATCCGTC‐3′ Reverse: GTATACCGCATCAATCTTTTCCG‐3′
MMP-9: Forward: 5′‐CACCTTCACTCGCGTGTAC‐3′ Reverse: 5′‐CATCTGCGTTTCCAAACCGAG‐3′
PCRs were carried out under the following conditions: the PCR mixture was denaturized for the 60 s at 90 °C followed by another 60 s, 40 cycles of denaturation under 95 °C for 40 s, the 40th cycle was set for 120 s under 72 °C. A final 41st cycle was similar except the extension step extended for 10 min.
The outcome of PCR reaction was separated on agarose gel electrophoresis and standardized with β-actin [13].
ELISA detection of MMP-2 and MMP-9
We measured MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the study participants by a commercial ELISA kit purchased from Chemicon International; Temecula, CA, (Catalog No. CC073). The procedure was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The serum levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were estimated in all patients with the carcinoma of the breast before surgery and 6–12 months thereafter.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were done by SPSS version 22. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error (mean ± SE) and presented by Box-plots. Comparison of expression values between the groups was performed by the non-parametric tests (two-tailed Mann–Whitney-U-test or Kraskal–Wallis test and p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
mRNA of MMP-2 in breast tumors
Analysis of MMP-2 mRNA levels showed no significant difference between normal breast tissues and breast cancer tissues groups (p > 0.05). No difference in MMP-2 mRNA level between those with lymphatic metastasis and those without metastasis. (p > 0.05) (Fig. 1a).
MMP‐2 tissue expression by ELISA
MMP‐2 levels were significantly elevated in breast cancer tissue (mean ± SE = 182.4 ± 98.3 ng/mg total protein) compared to tissues of benign breast diseases (mean ± SE = 52.7 ± 16.6) and normal breast Tissue (mean ± SE = 4.3 ± 0.5) (p = 0.01). The elevated levels of MMP-2 were noted in all stages of breast cancer with lymph node metastases (N1-3) and without (N0) lymph metastases (Fig. 1b).
Plasma level of MMP‐2 by ELISA
The levels of MMP‐2 were elevated in the plasma of patients with breast carcinoma (mean ± SE, 572.9 ± 44.8 ng/ml) compared to the healthy control group (mean ± SE, 76.4 ± 5.7 ng/ml) (p < 0.0001) and to those with benign breast diseases (mean ± SE, 216.4 ± 9.0 ng/ml) (p < 0.001). This elevation was also correlated with TNM tumor stage and with nodal metastasis. The plasma levels were significantly different with tumor stage (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1c) and with axillary nodal metastasis (N1-3) (mean ± SE = 590 ± 45.2) and (N0) (500 ± 30.4) ((p < 0.01) (Fig. 1d).
mRNA of MMP-9 in breast tumours
MMP‐9 levels were elevated in both malignant breast tissues and benign breast conditions in comparison to normal breast tissues (p < 0.03). Breast cancer patients with nodal metastases had significantly elevated mRNA-MMP-9 in comparison to those without nodal metastasis (N0) (p < 0.04) (Fig. 2a).
Breast tissues levels of MMP‐9 by ELISA
The levels of MMP‐9 were elevated in the malignant tissues of patients with breast carcinoma (mean ± SE, 498.4 ± 71.9 ng/mg total protein) compared with those with benign breast diseases (BBD) (mean ± SE, 83.6 ± 32.4) and with normal breast tissues (mean ± SE, 6.5 ± 3.5) (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2b). When considering nodal metastasis in the analysis of MMP-9 levels, there was no correlation between patients with and those without lymph nodes involvement.
Plasma level of MMP‐9 by ELISA
The levels of MMP‐9 were elevated in the plasma of patients with breast carcinoma (mean ± SE, 58.7 ± 7.9 ng/ml) compared to the healthy control group (mean ± SE, 18.7 ± 5.2 ng/ml) (p = 0.0001) and to those with benign breast diseases (mean ± SE, 18.9 ± 2.5). This elevation was correlated also with tumor stage (p < 0.003) (Fig. 3c) but not with nodal metastasis (Fig. 3d).
Comparison between pre-operative and post-operative MMP-2 and MMP-9
Postoperative plasma samples showed marked decrease in the level of MMP-2 (mean ± SE = 136.3 ± 13.42 ng/ml) than the pre-operative level (mean ± SE, 572.9 ± 44.8 ng/ml.) (p< 0.0001) (Fig. 3a). Also, the plasma level of MMP‐9 (mean ± SE, 20.1 ± 4.42 ng/ml) was significantly reduced postoperatively than the preoperative level (mean ± SE, 58.7 ± 7.9 ng/ml) (p< 0.0001)(Fig. 3b).
Discussion
We carried out the present study to analyze MMP-2 and MMP-9 in early and locally advanced breast carcinoma and to correlate tumor mRNA, protein and pre and postoperative plasma levels.
Wide variety in concentrations of mRNA of MMP-2 was found in many studies. In the current work, there was no meaningful rise in MMP-2mRNA in breast cancer. Our results are different from studies by Pellikainen et al. [14] and Li et al. [15] who announced that MMP-2 levels were elevated in malignant breast tissues and associated with tumor stage. Li et al. [15] detailed additionally locational differences among normal and malignant tissues.
MMP-9 mRNA expression also showed a wide variation in both normal and cancer tissues. In the present study, MMP-9 mRNA was elevated in both benign breast diseases and cancer. Lebeau et al. [16] and Katunina et al.[17] found the same results.
The results of our study discovered that levels of MMP-2 in breast carcinoma agree with the results of Giannelli et al., and Shah et al. indicating elevated levels in malignant tissues in comparison to normal tissues [18, 19]. Moreover, Li et al. [15] noted a correlation between MMP-2 level and TNM clinical stages. Also, we observed higher levels of MMP-2 within tumors with extensive metastases to lymph nodes (N1-3) than in tumors without lymph nodes involvement.
Similar to the mRNA expression, MMP-9 protein expression exhibited increases in both benign breast diseases and cancer. This increased level was seen in different TNM tumor stages and associated with the bad prognosis. Similarly, Yang observed significant increases in the MMP-9 ratio of cancer breast and normal breast tissues [20]. Moreover Radenkovic et al. [21] observed that ProMMP-9 and aMMP-9 activity in tumor tissue showed a positive association with tumor size.
Serum estimations of both MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 are reported as having limited value for tumor staging and prognosis in other malignancies [22]. In the present study, plasma levels MMP-2 and MMP-9 were examined preoperatively and following curative surgery. We used plasma as the serum levels of MMP-9 can be many times higher than plasma values, may be due to blood clotting resulting in degranulation of neutrophils and release of stored MMP-9 [23].
The predominant plasma species of each MMP‐9 and MMP‐2 are the latent 92 kDa and 72 kDa forms, as active forms are quickly sequestered and cleared by circulating α2‐macroglobulins [23]. In the MMP‐2 case, we noted that samples from healthy volunteers were considerably lower than in-patients with breast carcinomas. Plasma levels of MMP‐2 were considerably increased in patients with axillary lymph node involvement, indicating that MMP‐2 had enhanced this lymph node spread. Li et al., additionally found that MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels in malignant breast specimens were correlative with axillary nodal involvement and clinical stage of the disease in agreement with our results [15]. We found no considerable correlation between plasma levels of MMP‐2 and tumor levels. This could be explained by the presence of different types and values of MMP-2 within the tumors and the plasma [23].
Additionally, we found that plasma MMP‐9 was considerably increased with respect to TNM stages. As with MMP‐2, there was a significant increasing trend in MMP‐9 levels with the advancement in tumor stage. This can be in line with the results reportable by Mehner et al. [24]. In contradiction to the previous, Remacle showed that MMP‐9 was of limited value for tumor staging and prognosis [25].
Stankovic et al. [26] showed that the activity of proMMP-2 and proMMP-9 significantly increased with each advancing clinical stage of disease and compared to controls.
Following breast carcinoma resections, we noted a marked decrease in mean values of plasma MMP‐2 and MMP‐9, emphasizing that removal of breast carcinoma results in normalization of plasma values. This observation draws attention that MMP-2 and MMP-2 levels may be used as markers for complete tumor removal or the presence of micro-metastasis in case of they still high or increasing after tumor removal, but these conditions should be studied in the future in a large series of patients.
Interestingly, the important correlation of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 expression with tumor stage were plasma levels. Although mean MMP‐9 levels are significantly raised in cancer patients, an elevated preoperative value has a low positive predictive value for use as a screening test as there is a wide range in the normal population.
Furthermore, the levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 are increased in a number of malignancies of the different human site such as the ovaries [27], liver [28] and cervix [29], therefore, they are not confined for breast malignancies. This character could be useful as markers for follow-up or monitoring response to treatment.
In addition to the previous character, MMP‐2 localizes at invasive margins of tumors and is specifically elevated in the plasma of patients with advanced disease. Plasma measurement may, therefore, be useful in patients who are apparent early stage disease based on pathological examination but may be at higher risk of micrometastasis due to high MMP‐2 levels and hence may benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Further study with a large number of patients is required to determine the balance between other proteolytic enzymes such as MMP-7, cathepsins and their inhibitors such as TIMP-1 and TIMP-2.
To summarize, the current study showed that plasma levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 correlate with breast cancer clinical stage, MMP-2 may be used as a measure for tumor burden and lastly, both MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels fall following curative surgical interference of the breast, emphasizing their possible use as markers for persistent or recurrent disease.
References
Abdelaziz AH, Abdou AM, Habeeb CN (2018) Breast cancer treatment waiting time, patient and provider contributions: an Egyptian breast cancer centre experience. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy297.015
Kashiwagi S, Tsujio G, Asano Y, Goto W, Takada K, Takahashi K, Morisaki T et al (2018) Study on the progression types of cancer in patients with breast cancer undergoing eribulin chemotherapy and tumor microenvironment. J Transl Med 16(1):54
Cardoso AP, Pinto ML, Pinto AT, Oliveira MI, Pinto MT, Gonçalves R, Relvas JB, Figueiredo C, Seruca R, Mantovani A, Mareel M, Barbosa MA, Oliveira MJ (2014) Macrophages stimulate gastric and colorectal cancer invasion through EGFR Y1086, c-Src, Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation and smallGTPase activity. Oncogene 33:2123–2133
Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z (2012) The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol 196:395–406
Cruciat CM, Ohkawara B, Acebron SP, Karaulanov E, Reinhard C, Ingelfinger D, Boutros M, Niehrs C (2010) Requirement of prorenin receptor and vacuolar H+-ATPase-mediated acidification for Wnt signaling. Science 327:459–463
Chung C, Mader CC, Schmitz JC, Atladottir J, Fitchev P, Cornwell ML, Koleske AJ, Crawford SE, Gorelick F (2011) The vacuolar-ATPase modulates matrix metalloproteinase isoforms in human pancreatic cancer. Lab Investig 91:732–743
Malcherczyk D, Heyse TJ, El-Zayat BF, Kunzke V, Moll R, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Paletta JRJ (2018) Expression of MMP-9 decreases metastatic potential of chondrosarcoma: an immunohistochemical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):9
Deryugina EI, Quigley JP (2006) Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25(1):9–34
Talvensaari-Mattila A, Pääkkö P, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T (2003) Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is associated with survival in breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 89(7):1270–1275
Bando E, Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Sasaki T, Taniguchi K, Fujita H et al (1998) Immunohistochemical study of MT-MMP tissue status in gastric carcinoma and correlation with survival analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Oncol Rep 5(6):1483–1488
Hua H, Li M, Luo T, Yin Y, Jiang Y (2011) Matrix metalloproteinases in tumorigenesis: an evolving paradigm. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(23):3853–3868
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP (2017) The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ‘personalized’ approach to cancer staging. CA: Cancer J Clin 67(2):93–99
Ishikawa T, Ichikawa Y, Mitsuhashi M, Momiyama N, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Yamaoka H, Miyazakic K, Nagashima Y, Akitaya T, Shimada H (1996) Matrilysin is associated with progression of colorectal tumor. Cancer Lett 107:5–10
Pellikainen JM, Ropponen KM, Kataja VV, Kellokoski JK, Eskelinen MJ, Kosma V-M (2004) Expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 in breast cancer with a special reference to activator protein-2, HER2, and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 10(22):7621
Li H, Qiu Z, Li F, Wang C (2017) The relationship between MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression levels with breast cancer incidence and prognosis. Oncol Lett 14(5):5865–5870
Lebeau A, Müller-Aufdemkamp C, Allmacher C, Sauer U, Nerlich A, Lichtinghagen R, Löhrs U (2004) Cellular protein and mRNA expression patterns of matrix metalloproteinases-2, -3 and -9 in human breast cancer: correlation with tumour growth. J Mol Histol 35:443–455
Katunina AI, Gershtein ES, Ermilova VD, Tereshkina IV, Nazarenko AY, Tyleuova AA, Dvorova EK, Karabekova ZK, Gritskevich MV, Berezov TT (2011) Matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7, and 9 in tumors and sera of patients with breast cancer. Bull Exp Biol Med 151:359–362
Giannelli G, Erriquez R, Fransvea E, Daniele A, Trerotoli P, Schittulli F, Grano M, Quaranta M, Antonaci S (2004) Proteolytic imbalance is reversed after therapeutic surgery in breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 109:782–785
Shah FD, Shah PM, Patel PS (2010) Clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 46:194–202
Yang J, Min K-W, Kim D-H, Son BK, Moon KM, Wi YC, Bang SS, Oh YH, Do S-I, Chae SW, Oh S, Kim YH, Kwon MJ (2018) High TNFRSF12A level associated with MMP-9 overexpression is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer: gene set enrichment analysis and validation in large-scale cohorts. PLoS ONE 13(8):e0202113
Radenkovic S, Konjevic G, Jurisic V et al (2014) Values of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in tumor tissue of basal-like breast cancer patients. Cell Biochem Biophys 68:143
Jonsson A, Hjalmarsson C, Falk P, Ivarsson ML (2016) Levels of matrix metalloproteinases differ in plasma and serum—aspects regarding analysis of biological markers in cancer. Br J Cancer 115(6):703–706
Zucker S, Lysik RM, Zarrabi HM, Moll U, Tickle SP, Stetler-Stevenson W, Baker TS, Docherty AJ (1994) Plasma assay of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and MMP-inhibitor complexes in cancer. Potential use in predicting metastasis and monitoring treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 732:248–262
Mehner C, Hockla A, Miller E, Ran S, Radisky DC, Radisky ES (2014) Tumor cell-produced matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) drives malignant progression and metastasis of basal-like triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 5(9):2736–2749
Remacle AG, Noel A, Duggan C et al (1998) Assay of matrix metalloproteinases types 1, 2, 3 and 9 in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 77:926–931
Stankovic S, Konjevic G, Gopcevic K et al (2010) Activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and sera of breast cancer patients. Pathol Res Pract 206(4):241–247
Sillanpää S, Anttila M, Voutilainen K, Ropponen K, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Puistola U et al (2007) Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 104(2):296–303
Nart D, Yaman B, Yılmaz F, Zeytunlu M, Karasu Z, Kılıç M (2010) Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 16:621–630
Zhang Haiyan, Li Guang, Zhang Zhen, Wang Surong, Zhang Shiqian (2017) MMP-2 and MMP-9 gene polymorphisms associated with cervical cancer risk. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 10(12):11760–11765
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alrehaili, A.A., Gharib, A.F., Karam, R.A. et al. Clinical significance of plasma MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 levels as biomarkers for tumor expression in breast cancer patients in Egypt. Mol Biol Rep 47, 1153–1160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05216-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-05216-5