Introduction

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline and antibiotic antitumor agent that is widely used for treating a wide range of solid tumors and cancers, including soft tissue sarcomas, lymphomas, breast, bladder, ovarian, lungs and blood cancers (Ibrahim et al. 2021; Songbo et al. 2019). Mechanistically, DOX antitumor effects is mediated by its ability to interacts with DNA, inhibition of macromolecular biosynthesis and topoisomerase II, leading to a halt in DNA replication (Sergazy et al. 2020) Besides, DOX also exerts its cytotoxicity by increasing free radical production and oxidative stress (Shafei et al. 2017). Although DOX has shown promising efficacy in the management of cancers and solid tumors, its clinical applications has been significantly curtailed due to severe toxicities including cardiotoxicity, myelosuppression, alopecia and neurotoxicity (El-Agamy et al. 2018; Granados-Principal et al. 2010). In fact, due to these side effects DOX has been nick named “red devil” or “red death. Although the penetration of DOX into the blood brain barrier is relatively poor, several reports have indicated that DOX can accumulate in the brain and cause significant toxicity through a secondary mechanism via elevated peripheral TNF-α which penetrates the blood brain barrier and impede antioxidant defense Du et al. 2021; Liao et al. 2018; Eide and Feng 2020). DOX induced neurotoxicity (Chemobrain) is typically characterized by impaired cognitive function and neuropsychiatric disorders (Merzoug et al. 2014; Liao et al. 2018).

Multiple studies have implicated ROS generation, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of DOX-induced chemo brain. As such any therapy that significant modulates these factors may serve as a preventive agent against DOX-induced Chemobrain (Liao et al. 2018; Shaker et al. 2021; El-Agamy et al. 2018).

Juglanin (JUG; Fig. 1), a flavonoid glycoside isolated from Polygonum aviculare has received attention in recent years due to its excellent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-cancer effects (Wang et al. 2021a, b; Liu et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021). Ample pharmacological studies have brought into limelight the neuroprotective efficacy of JUG. For instance, JUG was reported to show inhibitory effect against LPS-induced neuroinflammation through its anti-inflammatory properties (Zhang et al. 2018). Moreover, JUG showed preventive effects against neuronal injury induced by cerebral ischemia (Liu et al. 2020). Inspired by these findings, we envisaged that JUG could also exert protective effects against DOX-induced Chemo brain through its ability to inhibit oxidative stress and inflammation. As such this study evaluated the protective effects of JUG against DOX-induced cognitive dysfunction in rats.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chemical structure of Juglanin

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

JUG was graciously provided by Prof. Jian Tang (Bozhou University. Anhui, China). DOX was procured from Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd., India. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Biochemical kits for SOD, GSH, CAT and MDA analysis were procured from Nanjing Jian Cheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). All the other chemicals were of analytical grade purity and used as purchased.

Animals and treatments

Twenty four (6 weeks old male Sprague Dawley rats; 180 ± 40 g) were used in this experiment. The animals were housed at an experimental animal house facility with standard conditions of temperature 22 ± 2 °C and light-controlled environment (12 h light and dark cycles). The animals were acclimatized for 1 week and fed ad libitum with standard rat diet and water. After acclimatization, the rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 6) as follows: normal control, JUG, DOX and JUG + DOX groups. The rats in DOX group were intraperitoneally administered with 5 mg/kg DOX once a week for 3 weeks (total dose of 15 mg/kg), while the rats in JUG + DOX group were orally pretreated with JUG (30 mg/kg/day) for a week before receiving a weekly injection of DOX as stated above together with daily doses of JUG for 3 weeks. The normal control, DOX group were treated with 5% DMSO, while the JUG groups were treated with JUG (30 mg/kg) for 4 weeks. The doses of JUG and DOX used in this study was adopted from previous studies (Zhang and Xu 2018; Rizk et al. 2017; Kwatra et al. 2016). Upon completion of the treatment, all the rats were subjected to series of neurobehavioral studies. The schematic treatment protocol for the study is illustrated in Fig. 2. All animals were handled according to the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines on the ethical use of animals and the experiment received approval from the ethics Committee of Wuhu Second Peoples Hospital (Approval NO. AHWHSEY2021-08-18).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Experimental study timeline

Neurobehavioral studies

Morris water maze test

The MWM test was utilized to access the memory and learning ability of the DOX treated rats (Huang et al. 2021). Briefly, the MWM apparatus consisted of a circular water container filled with water at 25 °C. A hidden platform was submerged 1 cm below the surface of the water in one of the quadrant of the apparatus and the water surface was covered with powdered milk. The animals were given four days of training, during this period rats were placed in the water tank and allowed to locate the position of the hidden platform within 60 s and rats that were unable to achieve this task within 60 s were guided to the position of the platform. On the fifth day, the platform was removed and the time spent by the rats in the target quadrant, the swimming speed and the number of target quadrant crossings were recorded.

Y-maze test

The Y maze test was used for evaluating spatial memory and learning using spontaneous alternation test (Fan et al. 2021). In brief, the maze was made up of three identical arms positioned at 120 °C to each other in a Y shaped structure. The rats were individually placed in the middle of the maze and allowed to freely explore the maze for 5 min. The percentage alternation of each rats was evaluated based successive entries into alternate arm (Fan et al. 2021).

Forced swimming test

The FST was used to evaluate depressive-like behavior in DOX treated animals (Liao et al. 2018). For the pretest, the rats were placed in a transparent cylindrical shaped glass (40 cm high and 30 cm diameter) containing 30 cm of water at 25 °C and allowed to swim for 15 min. After 24 h, the rats were subjected to the same experimental conditions stated above for 5 min. The swimming, climbing and immobility time was recorded.

Animal sacrifice

At the end of the neurobehavioral experiment, all the rats were sacrificed and the brain was immediately excised, cleaned with phosphate buffer saline and weighed.

Histopathological observation

The brain of the rats were fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution, embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 4 μm thickness sections. The sections were further deparaffinized, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and visualized under a light microscope.

Biochemical analysis

The whole brain was homogenized in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (1:9 w/v) and centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant obtained after decanting were stored at -80 °C until used for further analysis.

Inflammatory mediators measurement

The brain concentration inflammatory mediators including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and NF-κB were measured in the brain homogenate with the help of ELISA kits following the instructions of the manufacturer (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

Oxidative stress bio-markers measurement

The brain oxidative stress bio-markers including malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT) were measured in the brain homogenate using kits provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute.

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) measurement

The brain activities of AchE were assayed using the method of Ellman et al., (1961). Briefly, a mixture containing phosphate buffer, 10 mM DTNB, 50 mM of acetylthiocholine iodide and an aliquot of brain tissue homogenate. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 ◦C for 10 min and the absorbance of the yellow color formed was measured at 412 nm.

Caspase 3 activity measurement

Caspase 3 activity in the brain homogenate was measured using ELISA kits from Cusabio following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) software and data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparison. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Effect of JUG on DOX-induced body weight loss

As shown in Fig. 3A, the DOX-treated rats showed marked reduction in their body weight relative to the normal control and JUG rats. Moreover, the JUG treated rats demonstrated significant increase in their body weight compared to DOX group (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of juglanin on memory and cognitive dysfunctions in doxorubicin injected rats. (A) Body weight (B) Percentage of spontaneous alternation in the Y-maze test (C) Total number of arm entries in the Y-maze test (D) Latency of escape on during training days in MWM test (E) Time spent in the target quadrant in the MWM test (F) Number of platform crossing. Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.05 compared to the normal control and JUG groups; ##p<0.05 compared to DOX group

Effect of JUG on DOX-induced behavioral deficits

The results shown in Fig. 3B indicated that DOX treated rats showed significantly lower percentage spontaneous alternation compared to the normal control and JUG rats in the Y maze test (Fig. 3B). Whereas, in the JUG+DOX treated rats, the percentage spontaneous alternation was observed to be significantly increased compared to DOX alone treated rats (Fig. 3B). Albeit there were no significant differences in the total arm entries of all the groups (Fig. 3C). In the MWM test, the escape latency of the DOX treated rats was significantly prolonged compared to the normal control and JUG group during the four days of the position navigation training (Fig. 3D). In contrast, treatment with JUG significantly improved learning and memory as portrayed by reduced latency of escape compared to the DOX group. Furthermore, in the space exploration test (day 5), the time spent and number of crossings in the target quadrant where the hidden platform was originally located were significantly increased in the JUG+DOC treated rats compared to the DOX alone group (Fig. 3E-F).

Effect of JUG on DOX-induced anxiety and depression-like behaviors

There were obvious differences in the immobility time of the DOX treated rats when compared to the normal control and JUG rats. The rats in the DOX treated group showed significantly increased immobility time, while the swimming and climbing time were concurrently reduced compared with the normal control and JUG groups (Fig. 4A-C). Interestingly, these changes were markedly reversed in JUG treated rats. The immobility time was significantly reduced, while the swimming and climbing time were increased accordingly compared to the DOX alone treated group (Fig. 4A-C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of juglanin on depressive like behaviors in doxorubicin injected rats (A) Immobility time (C) Swimming time (C) Climbing time in the forced swimming test. Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.05 compared to the normal control and JUG groups; ##p<0.05 compared to DOX group

Effect of JUG on DOX-induced neuroinflammation

It is well known that increased oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines plays a critical role in DOX-induced Chemobrain, leading to neuroinflammation. The concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α (Fig. 5A), IL-1β (Fig. 5B) and IL-6 (Fig. 5C) in the brain of the DOX alone treated rats were significantly augmented compared to the normal control and JUG groups. Additionally, NF-kB level (Fig. 5D) was also observed to be marked increased in the brain of DOX alone treated rats. Whereas, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and NF-kB were notably decreased in JUG+DOX treated rats compared with the DOX group (Fig. 5A-D).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of juglanin on inflammatory mediators in the brain doxorubicin injected rats (A) TNF-α (B) IL-1β (C) IL-6 (D) NFkB. Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.05 compared to the normal control and JUG groups; ##p<0.05 compared to DOX group

Effect of JUG on DOX-induced oxidative stress in the brain of rats

As shown in Fig. 6A, MDA level in the brain was increased significantly in the DOX treated rats compared to the normal control and JUG groups, while treatment with JUG significantly decreased brain MDA level (Fig. 6A). Consistently, the brain antioxidation capacity of the DOX alone treated rats was compromised as indicated by significant decreases in SOD (Fig. 6B), CAT (Fig. 6C) and GSH (Fig. 6D) compared with normal control and JUG groups. Howbeit compared to the DOX alone treated group, JUG significantly increased the activities of these brain antioxidant enzymes in addition to reducing MDA level (Fig. 6A-D).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of juglanin on oxidative stress parameters in the brain DOX injected rats (A) MDA (B) SOD (C) CAT (D) GSH. Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.05 compared to the normal control and JUG groups; ##p<0.05 compared to DOX group

JUG attenuated brain histopathological changes in DOX treated rats

The therapeutic effect of JUG in DOX treated rats was further confirmed by histopathological evaluation. As indicated in Fig. 7A-B, the normal control and JUG only-treated rats showed normal brain histological structures of the cerebral cortex, compared to the DOX alone treated group that showed gross histopathological alterations including pyknosis, congested blood vessels, degenerated and swollen neurons (Fig. 7C). Interestingly, in the JUG+DOX group, most of the pathological alteration were significantly alleviated compared to the DOX alone treated group (Fig. 7A-D).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of Juglanin on DOX-induced histopathological alterations of rat brain. Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin stained sections from (A) Normal control group (B) JUG group (C) DOX group (D) JUG + DOX group. Magnification power X400. Black arrow: pyknosis and swollen neutrons. Red arrow: congested blood vessels

Effect of JUG on brain AChE activity in DOX treated rats

As shown in Fig. 8A, the level of AChE in the brain of the DOX alone treated rats were markedly increased compared to the normal control and JUG groups, while JUG treatment notably reduced the activities of AchE in comparison to the DOX alone rats.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effects of juglanin on (A) AchE (B) Caspase 3 in the brain of DOX injected rats. Data were presented as mean ± SD. **p<0.05 compared to the normal control and JUG groups; ##p<0.05 compared to DOX group

Effect of JUG on brain caspase 3 activity in DOX treated rats

As shown in Fig. 8B, the administration of DOX to rats significantly increased caspase 3 in the brain of the rats as compared with the normal and JUG rats. Whereas, administration of JUG with DOX significantly lowered caspase 3 activity as compared with the DOX alone treated rats (Fig. 8B).

Discussion

The global fight against cancer has resulted in the discovery and development of several anticancer drugs including platinum based anticancer drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin), anthracyclines (doxorubicin, idarubicin and mitoxantrone) and alkylating antineoplastic agents (cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide). However, majority of these chemotherapeutic drugs have varying degrees of side effects, some of which could be fatal and life threatening. Amongst them DOX is one of the prominently used anticancer drug. The anticancer effect of DOX is associated with inhibition of topoisomerase II and formation of complexes that disrupts DNA or RNA synthesis (Cavalcanti et al., 2021). However, DOX presents several side effects including cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity that has curtailed its clinical application (Ikewuchi et al. 2021)). DOX-induced neurotoxicity has been proposed to be related to ROS generation, oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokine upsurge leading to neuronal death and brain oxidative damage (Cappetta et al. 2017; Bredlau et al. 2018; Ibrahim et al. 2021). Since DOX-induced oxidative stress and inflammation has been implicated in the onset and progression of Chemobrain, it is widely believed that antioxidant agents may be beneficial in preventing or modulating these side effects (Songbo et al. 2019). In this sense, this study investigated the protective effects of juglanin against DOX-induced Chemobrain. This present investigation found that treatment with JUG decreased memory and learning impairment, anxiety like behaviors, brain proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress in the DOX treated rats, suggesting that JUG possesses neuroprotective activities which may be associated with its ability to modulate oxidative stress and inflammation.

Neurobehavioral analyses including MWM and Y maze tests has been extensively used for examining learning and memory capabilities as well as the willingness of the animals to explore new environments. Moreover, previous studies have revealed that DOX-induced Chemobrain is associated with impairment in spatial memory and learning functions in the MWM and Y maze test as evidenced by increase in platform escape latency and reduced percentage alterations (Mounier et al. 2021; El-Agamy et al. 2018). Furthermore, this study observed significant depressive like behaviors in the DOX alone treated rats as portrayed by enhanced immobility duration in the forced swimming test, which was consistent with previous studies (Kwatra et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2016) Contrarily, treatment with JUG significantly prevented cognitive deficits and depressive like behaviors delineating the memory enhancing effect of JUG.

The results from this study indicated that DOX administration enhanced the activity of AchE in the brain of the rats. Numerous studies have illustrated the vital role that acetylcholine plays in cognition. Increase in AchE activity has been widely linked to rapid decline in cognitive function especially in dementias like Alzheimer’s disease (Khadrawy et al., 2021; El-Agamy et al. 2018). JUG treatment reduced brain AchE activity in the treated rats, thus enhancing their cognitive abilities.

Oxidative stress resulting from excessive accrual of ROS have been conspicuously identified as a major player mediating DOX-induced toxicity including DOX-induced cognitive deficits. Several studies have suggested that the production of highly reactive and toxic free radicals are involved in the oxidation reaction involving DOX binding to cell membranes (Cappetta et al. 2017; Ibrahim et al. 2021). In addition, quinone containing molecules like DOX encourages redox recycling that leads to the generation of large amounts of superoxide anion radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical and peroxynitrite leading to massive depletion in endogenous antioxidant defense (Zhu et al. 2016). DOX induced oxidative stress was evidenced in this study as portrayed by gross reduction in the activities of brain catalase, glutathione and superoxide dismutase as well as apparent increase in lipid peroxidation levels in the brain. These observations were obviously in agreement with previous studies (Mounier et al. 2021; Kwatra et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2021a, b). The antioxidant effect of JUG was evident in reversing the altered oxidative stress parameters in the brain of the DOX treated rats. JUG treatment decreased the elevated MDA levels and markedly restored the altered antioxidant defense enzyme activities i.e. GSH, SOD and CAT in the brain. The antioxidant potential of JUG may be attributed to its free radicals scavenging capabilities which agreed with previous reported studies (Ge et al. 2020; Kong and Xu 2020).

Moreover, DOX prompted ROS and oxidative stress have been reported to activate several redox sensitive inflammatory transcriptional factor such as NF-κB which subsequently enhances the production and release of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 (Wei et al. 2020; Liao et al. 2018). These proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α have the ability to bypass the blood brain barrier to exert neuroinflammation resulting in brain damage (Ibrahim et al. 2021; Tangpong et al. 2006, 2007). In addition, mounting evidences have shown that neuroinflammation is critically involved in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative and brain related disorders via the TNF-α and NF-κB pathways (Frank-Cannon et al. 2009; Chtourou et al. 2015; El-Naga et al. 2014). We observed that treatment with DOX provoked significantly high concentration of inflammatory mediators including TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1β and IL-6, suggesting neuroinflammation, which was supported by previous studies (Ramalingayya et al. 2017; Ali et al. 2020; Mounier et al. 2021). Whereas, treatment with JUG markedly suppressed DOX-induced increase in TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and NF-κB in the brain of treated rats.

Caspase 3, an important marker of cellular apoptosis has been widely reported to be influenced by oxidative stress and inflammation in several diseases including DOX induced toxicity (Abu Gazia and El-Magd 2018). The findings from this study indicated elevated level of caspase 3 in the brain tissues of DOX treated rats. Several studies have shown an increase in caspase 3 activity following exposure to DOX (El-Agamy et al. 2016, 2018; Rizk et al. 2017). In contrast to DOX treated rats, JUG administration significantly reduced the level of caspase 3 in the brain tissues of the treated rats.

Conclusions

Conclusively, the results obtained in this study suggested that JUG protected against DOX induced cognitive dysfunction by improving memory and learning capabilities, decreasing depressive like behaviors and ameliorate oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain tissues of DOX treated rats. The results stated above demonstrated that JUG may offer protection in chemotherapy induced toxicity.