Abstract
We give a heat kernel proof of the algebraic index theorem for deformation quantization with separation of variables on a pseudo-Kähler manifold. We use normalizations of the canonical trace density of a star product and of the characteristic classes involved in the index formula for which this formula contains no extra constant factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Given a manifold M, denote by \(C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) the space of formal Laurent series
where \(r \in \mathbb {Z}\) and \(f_i \in C^\infty (M)\) for \(i \ge r\). We call f a formal function on M. Let \(\pi \) be a Poisson bivector field on M. A formal deformation quantization on the Poisson manifold \((M, \pi )\) is an associative product \(\star \) on \(C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) given by the formula
In (1) \(C_r\) are bidifferential operators on M and
where \(\{f,g\} = \pi (df \wedge dg)\) is the Poisson bracket corresponding to \(\pi \). We assume that a star product is normalized, i.e., the unit constant function \(\mathbf{{1}}\) is the identity, \(f \star \mathbf{{1}}= \mathbf{{1}}\star f = f\) for any f. Given formal functions f, g on M, we denote by \(L^\star _f\) the operator of left multiplication by f and by \(R^\star _g\) the operator of right multiplication by g with respect to the star product \(\star \), so that \(f \star g = L^\star _f g = R^\star _g f\). We have \([L^\star _f,R^\star _g]=0\) for any f, g.
A star product can be restricted to any open set \(U \subset M\). We denote by \(C_0^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) the space of formal functions compactly supported on U. For \(f = \nu ^r f_r + \cdots \in C_0^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) each function \(f_i\) has compact support in U, but we do not require that all \(f_i, i \ge r\), have a common compact support in U.
Two star products \(\star _1\) and \(\star _2\) on \((M, \pi )\) are equivalent if there exists a formal differential operator
on M such that
The problem of existence and classification up to equivalence of star products on Poisson manifolds was stated in [2] and settled by Kontsevich in [21], who proved that star products exist on an arbitrary Poisson manifold and their equivalence classes are parametrized by the formal deformations of the Poisson structure modulo the action of formal diffeomorphisms.
A symplectic manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\) is equipped with a nondegenerate Poisson bivector field \(\pi \) inverse to \(\omega _{-1}\). Fedosov gave in [8] and [9] a simple geometric construction of star products in each equivalence class on an arbitrary symplectic manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\). The equivalence classes of star products on \((M, \omega _{-1})\) are bijectively parametrized by the formal cohomology classes from
Let \(\star \) be a star product on a connected symplectic manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\) of dimension 2m. There exists a formal trace density for the product \(\star \) which is globally defined on M and is unique up to a factor from \(\mathbb {C}((\nu ))\). Fedosov introduced in [8] a canonically normalized formal trace density for the product \(\star \) using local isomorphisms between that product and the Moyal–Weyl star product. Then, in [9] he used this trace density to state and prove the algebraic index theorem for the star product \(\star \).
In this paper we consider a canonical formal trace density \(\mu _\star \) of the product \(\star \) on M which differs from Fedosov’s trace density by a factor from \(\mathbb {C}\). According to [17], the normalization of \(\mu _\star \) can be described intrinsically as follows. On each contractible open subset \(U \subset M\) there exists a local \(\nu \)-derivation of the product \(\star \) of the form
where A is a formal differential operator on U (see [13]). It is unique up to an inner derivation, i.e., all such \(\nu \)-derivations on U are of the form \(\delta _\star + [f, \cdot ]_\star \), where \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) and \([\cdot ,\cdot ]_\star \) is the commutator with respect to the product \(\star \). The canonical trace density \(\mu _\star \) satisfies the equation
for any formal function f compactly supported on U. Equation (2) determines \(\mu _\star \) on U up to a factor from \(\mathbb {C}\) which can be fixed by normalizing the leading term of \(\mu _\star \). In this paper we require that this leading term be
If M is compact, the total volume of the canonical trace density \(\mu _\star \) is given by a topological formula analogous to the Atiyah–Singer formula for the index of an elliptic operator,
where \(\theta _\star \) is the formal cohomology class that parametrizes the equivalence class of the star product \(\star \) and \(\hat{A}(M)\) is the \(\hat{A}\)-genus of the manifold M. The class \(\hat{A}(M)\) has a de Rham representative
where \(R_{TM}\) is the curvature of an arbitrary connection on TM. This statement is called the algebraic index theorem for deformation quantization and the total volume of the canonical trace density \(\mu _\star \) is called the algebraic index of the star product \(\star \). The algebraic index theorem has several different conceptual proofs. Fedosov’s proof is based upon the methods of Atiyah and Singer. Nest and Tsygan proved in [22] the algebraic index theorem for deformation quantization using cyclic homology and the local Riemann–Roch theorem by Feigin and Tsygan given in [11]. Various generalizations of the algebraic index theorem were obtained in [7, 10, 23,24,25].
Getzler gave in [12] a proof of the Atiah–Singer index theorem for a Dirac operator based upon the ideas of Witten and Alvarez-Gaumé (see [1]). In that proof he used symbols of pseudodifferential operators on a supermanifold. Berline, Getzler, and Vergne wrote later a book [3] on heat kernel proofs of index theorems for Dirac operators.
In this paper we prove the algebraic index theorem for a star product with separation of variables on a pseudo-Kähler manifold following Getzler’s approach. Many global geometric objects used in our proof are described locally on holomorphic coordinate charts by coordinate-independent constructions. The proofs of a number of statements are based on the interplay between pointwise products and star products with separation of variables. We use normalizations of the canonical trace density and of the characteristic classes involved in the index formula (4) for which this formula contains no extra constant factors.
This paper is dedicated to my teacher Alexandre Aleksandrovich Kirillov on the occasion of his 81st birthday.
2 Star products with separation of variables
Let M be a complex manifold of complex dimension m equipped with a Poisson bivector field \(\pi \). A star product \(\star \) on \((M, \pi )\) has the property of separation of variables of the anti-Wick type if
for any locally defined holomorphic function a, antiholomorphic function b, and arbitrary function f, which means that
are pointwise multiplication operators. Equivalently, the operators \(C_r\) in (1) act on the first argument by antiholomorphic partial derivatives and on the second argument by holomorphic ones. If there exists a star product with separation of variables on \((M,\pi )\), then the Poisson bivector \(\pi \) is of type (1,1) with respect to the complex structure. In local coordinates \(\pi \) is expressed as follows,
where \(g^{\bar{l}k}\) is the Poisson tensor corresponding to \(\pi \) and the Einstein summation over repeated upper and lower indices is used.
We say that a formal differential operator \(A = A_0 + \nu A_1 + \cdots \) on a manifold M is natural if \(A_r\) is a differential operator on M of order not greater than r for all \(r \ge 0\). A star product (1) is natural in the sense of [14] if the bidifferential operator \(C_r\) in (1) is of order not greater than r in each argument for all \(r \ge 1\) or, equivalently, if for any \(f \in C^\infty (M)\) the operators \(L^\star _f\) and \(R^\star _f\) on M are natural. If a star product \(\star \) is natural and \(f = \nu ^p f_p + \nu ^{p+1} f_{p+1} +\cdots \in C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) (i.e., the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of f is at least p), then the operators \(\nu ^{-p} L^\star _f\) and \(\nu ^{-p} R^\star _f\) are natural. It was proved in [18] that any star product with separation of variables on a complex manifold M is natural.
Given a star product with separation of variables \(\star \) on \((M,\pi )\), there exists a unique globally defined formal differential operator
on M such that for any locally defined holomorphic function a and antiholomorphic function b,
In particular, \({\mathcal I}_\star a = a\) and \({\mathcal I}_\star b = b\). It is called the formal Berezin transform associated with the star product \(\star \). A star product with separation of variables can be recovered from its formal Berezin transform. An equivalent star product \(\star '\) on \((M, \pi )\) given by the formula
is a star product with separation of variables of the Wick type, so that
where a and b are as above.
Lemma 2.1
For any local holomorphic function a and local antiholomorphic function b we have
Proof
The second formula can be proved similarly. \(\square \)
The star product \(\tilde{\star }\) opposite to \(\star '\),
is a star product with separation of variables of the anti-Wick type on \((M, -\pi )\). The star product \(\tilde{\star }\) is called dual to \(\star \). Its formal Berezin transform is \({\mathcal I}_{\tilde{\star }} = {\mathcal I}_\star ^{-1}.\)
In this paper we assume that a star product with separation of variables is of the anti-Wick type unless otherwise specified.
Let \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on \((M, \pi )\). The operator \(C_1\) in (1) written in coordinates on a local chart \(U \subset M\) is of the form
where \(g^{\bar{l}k}\) is the Poisson tensor corresponding to \(\pi \). If \(\pi \) is nondegenerate, it corresponds to a pseudo-Kähler form \(\omega _{-1}\) on M. Namely, the matrix \(g_{k\bar{l}}\) inverse to \(g^{\bar{l}k}\) is a pseudo-Kähler metric tensor such that
on U. If \(\Phi _{-1}\) is a potential of \(\omega _{-1}\) on U, then
We will omit the bars over the antiholomorphic indices in the tensors \(g_{k\bar{l}}\) and \(g^{\bar{l}k}\). In this paper we will use the notation
for \(p, q \ge 1\).
It was proved in [5, 15] that star products with separation of variables exist on an arbitrary pseudo-Kähler manifold \((M,\omega _{-1})\). Moreover, as shown in [15], the star products with separation of variables of the anti-Wick type on \((M,\omega _{-1})\) bijectively correspond to the closed formal (1,1)-forms
on M. Let \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on \((M, \omega _{-1})\) with classifying form (7). On a contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) every closed form \(\omega _r\) has a potential \(\Phi _r\), so that \(\omega _r = i \partial \bar{\partial }\Phi _r\). Then,
is a formal potential of \(\omega \) on U. The star product \(\star \) is uniquely determined by the property that
for \(1 \le k,l \le m\). Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), there exists a unique formal differential operator A on U which commutes with the operators \(R^\star _{\bar{z}^l} = \bar{z}^l\) and \(R^\star _{\partial \Phi / \partial \bar{z}^l}\) for \(1 \le l \le m\) and satisfies the condition \(A\mathbf{{1}}= f\). It coincides with the operator \(L^\star _f, \ A = L^\star _f\). This property allows to reconstruct the star product \(\star \) from its classifying form \(\omega \).
The Ricci form \(\rho \) on \((M,\omega _{-1})\) is given in local coordinates by the formula
The canonical class \(\varepsilon _M\) of the complex manifold M has a de Rham representative \(- \rho , \ \varepsilon _M = - [\rho ]\).
The formal cohomology class \(\theta _\star \) that parametrizes the equivalence class of a star product with separation of variables \(\star \) on M with classifying form \(\omega \) is given by the formula
where \([\omega ]\) is the de Rham class of \(\omega \). Formula (9) was given in [16], but, unfortunately, contained a wrong sign.
Let \(\tilde{\omega }\) be the classifying form of the star product with separation of variables \(\tilde{\star }\) on \((M, -\omega _{-1})\) dual to the product \(\star \). Then,
The following construction of a local non-normalized trace density for a star product with separation of variables \(\star \) on \((M,\omega _{-1})\) was introduced in [17]. Given a contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) and a potential \(\Phi = \nu ^{-1} \Phi _{-1} + \Phi _0 + \cdots \) of the classifying form \(\omega \) of the product \(\star \) on U, there exists a potential \(\Psi = -\nu ^{-1} \Phi _{-1} + \Psi _0 + \nu \Psi _1 + \cdots \) of the dual form \(\tilde{\omega }\) on U satisfying the equations
The potential \(\Psi \) is determined by Eqs. (10) up to an additive formal constant. As shown in [17],
where \(\hbox {d}z \hbox {d}\bar{z}\) is a Lebesgue measure on U, is a trace density for the product \(\star \) on U. In order to canonically normalize this trace density, one can use the following explicit local \(\nu \)-derivation of the product \(\star \) on U introduced in [16],
3 Deformation quantization on a super-Kähler manifold
In this section we recall a construction of a star product with separation of variables on a split supermanifold from [20].
Let E be a holomorphic vector bundle of rank d over a pseudo-Kähler manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\) equipped with a possibly indefinite sesquilinear fiber metric \(h_{\alpha \bar{\beta }}\) and let \(\Pi E\) be the corresponding split supermanifold. We identify the functions on \(\Pi E\) with the sections of \(\wedge \left( E^*\oplus \bar{E}^*\right) \), where \(E^*\) and \(\bar{E}\) are the dual and the conjugate bundles of E, respectively.
We say that a formal function \(f = \nu ^r f_r + \cdots \) on \(\Pi E\) is compactly supported over M if for each \(j \ge r\) the coefficient \(f_j\) is a compactly supported section of \(\wedge \left( E^*\oplus \bar{E}^*\right) \), or, equivalently, there exists a compact \(K_j \subset M\) such that the restriction of the function \(f_j\) to \(\Pi E|_{M {\setminus } K_j}\) vanishes.
Consider a holomorphic trivialization \(E|_U \cong U \times \mathbb {C}^d\) over an open set \(U \subset M\) and denote by \(\theta ^\alpha , \bar{\theta }^\beta , 1 \le \alpha ,\beta \le d,\) the odd fiber coordinates on \(\Pi E|_U \cong U \times \mathbb {C}^{0|d}\). A function f on \(\Pi E|_U\) can be written as
where the coefficients \(f_{\alpha _1 \ldots \alpha _p \bar{\beta }_1 \ldots \bar{\beta }_q} \in C^\infty (U)\) are separately antisymmetric in the indices \(\alpha _i\) and \(\beta _j\). A function (12) on \(\Pi E|_U\) is holomorphic if its coefficients are holomorphic and satisfy \(f_{\alpha _1 \ldots \alpha _p \bar{\beta }_1 \ldots \bar{\beta }_q}=0\) for \(q >0\). It is antiholomorphic if its coefficients are antiholomorphic and satisfy \(f_{\alpha _1 \ldots \alpha _p \bar{\beta }_1 \ldots \bar{\beta }_q}=0\) for \(p >0\).
The fiber metric \(h_{\alpha \bar{\beta }}\) on E determines a global even nilpotent function \(H = \nu ^{-1} H_{-1}\) on \(\Pi E\) such that locally
Let \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on \((M, \omega _{-1})\) with classifying form \(\omega \). It was shown in [20] that the star product \(\star \) and the function H determine a unique global star product with separation of variables \(*\) on \(\Pi E\) which is \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-graded with respect to the standard parity of the functions on \(\Pi E\) and satisfies the following property. Let \(U \subset M\) be any contractible coordinate chart, \(\Pi E|_U \cong U \times \mathbb {C}^{0|d}\) be a trivialization, \(\Phi = \nu ^{-1} \Phi _{-1} + \Phi _0 + \cdots \) be a potential of the form \(\omega \) on U identified with its lift to \(\Pi E|_U\), and
be an even superpotential on \(\Pi E|_U\). Then,
Here we assume that the fiberwise Grassmann multiplication operators and partial derivatives with respect to the odd variables \(\theta , \bar{\theta }\) act from the left, \(L_f\) is the left \(*\)-multiplication operator by f so that \(L_f g = f *g\), and \(R_f\) is the graded right \(*\)-multiplication operator by f, so that if f and g are homogeneous functions on \(\Pi E\), then
In particular, \(L_f\) supercommutes with \(R_g\) for any f, g. The star product \(*\) on \(\Pi E|_U\) is determined by the potential X. Given a formal function \(f \in C^\infty (\Pi E|_U)((\nu ))\), one can describe the operator \(L_f\) as follows. There exists a unique formal differential operator A on \(\Pi E|_U\) which supercommutes with the operators
and is such that \(A\mathbf{{1}}= f\). It coincides with the operator \(L_f, A = L_f\).
Denote by \({\mathcal I}\) the formal Berezin transform for the product \(*\). It is a formal differential operator globally defined on \(\Pi E\) and such that
for any local holomorphic function a and antiholomorphic function b on \(\Pi E\). In particular, \({\mathcal I}a = a\) and \({\mathcal I}b = b\). One can prove formulas analogous to (5) for the operator \({\mathcal I}\). For any function f,
It was shown in [20] that the star product \(*\) has a supertrace given by a canonically normalized formal supertrace density globally defined on \(\Pi E\).
A local non-normalized supertrace density for the product \(*\) can be obtained as follows. Given a contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) and a superpotential (13) which determines the star product \(*\) on \(\Pi E|_U\), there exists an even superpotential
on \(\Pi E|_U\) satisfying the equations
The formula
where \(\hbox {d}z \hbox {d}\bar{z}\) is a Lebesgue measure on U and \(d\theta d\bar{\theta }\) is a Berezin density (coordinate volume form) on \(\mathbb {C}^{0|d}\), gives a supertrace density for the star product \(*\) on \(\Pi E|_U \cong U \times \mathbb {C}^{0|d}\). It is determined up to a multiplicative formal constant.
4 A star product on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\)
In this section we fix a star product with separation of variables \(\star \) with classifying form \(\omega \) on a pseudo-Kähler manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\) of complex dimension m. We recall a construction from [19] of a star product with separation of variables \(\bullet \) on the tangent bundle TM obtained from the product \(\star \). We use the product \(\bullet \) to construct a star product \(*\) on the supermanifold \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) which will be the main framework for the proof of the algebraic index theorem for the star product \(\star \).
The tangent bundle TM can be identified with the cotangent bundle \(T^*M\) via the pseudo-Kähler metric on M. It was shown in [19] that the canonical symplectic form on \(T^*M\) transferred to TM via this identification is a global pseudo-Kähler form \(\Xi _{-1}\) on TM. Let \(U \subset M\) be a contractible coordinate chart with coordinates \(z^k, \bar{z}^l, 1 \le k,l \le m,\) and \(\Phi _{-1}\) be a potential of \(\omega _{-1}\) on U. Denote by \(\eta ^k, {\bar{\eta }}^l\) the corresponding fiber coordinates on TU. Then,
is a potential of \(\Xi _{-1}\) on TU. Let \(\pi _{TM}:TM \rightarrow M\) be the natural projection. It was shown in [19] that
is also a global pseudo-Kähler form on TM. We denote by \(\bullet \) the star product with separation of variables on the pseudo-Kähler manifold \((TM,\Omega _{-1})\) with the classifying form
If \(\Phi \) is a potential of \(\omega \) on U, then
is a potential of the form \(\Omega \) on TU.
Denote by E the holomorphic vector bundle over TM which is the pullback of the holomorphic tangent bundle \(T^{(1,0)}M\) by the natural projection \(\pi _{TM}\),
We equip E with the fiber metric induced by the pseudo-Kähler metric \(g_{kl}\) on M. The split supermanifold \(\Pi E\) can be identified with the total space of the bundle \(TM \oplus \Pi TM \rightarrow M\). Let \(U \subset M\) be a coordinate chart and
be the corresponding trivialization. We denote as above the even fiber coordinates by \(\eta ^k, \bar{\eta }^l\) and the odd ones by \(\theta ^k, \bar{\theta }^l\).
Let \(\psi = \nu ^{-1} \psi _{-1}\) be a global even nilpotent function on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) such that in local coordinates
As shown in [20], there is a unique star product with separation of variables \(*\) on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM \cong \Pi E\) obtained from the product \(\bullet \) on TM and the function \(\psi \) such that for any contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) the product \(*\) is determined on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) by the even superpotential
We denote by \(L_f\) and \(R_f\) the left and the graded right \(*\)-multiplication operators by a function f, respectively. The following formulas hold on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\),
We introduce two families of operators on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\),
It is known that \([D^k, D^p]=0\) and \([\bar{D}^l, \bar{D}^q] = 0\) for all k, l, p, q.
Proposition 4.1
Given a formal function \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) identified with its lift to \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\), the following formulas hold,
and
Proof
Denote temporarily the operator on the right-hand side of (20) by A. Since A is even, for any operator B the commutator of A and B coincides with their supercommutator. Clearly, \(A1=f\) and A commutes with the fiberwise Grassmann multiplication operators by the functions on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) which do not depend on the variables \(\eta \) and with the operators
In order to prove formula (20) it remains to show that A commutes with the operators
Since A commutes with the multiplication operators by the functions on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) which do not depend on the variables \(\eta \), it suffices to prove that it commutes with the operators \(\eta ^p + \nu D^p\). We will consider a “Fourier transform” which maps the operator \(\partial / \partial \eta ^k\) to the multiplication operator by the variable \(\xi _k\) and the multiplication operator by \(\eta ^k\) to the operator \(-\partial /\partial \xi ^k\). This mapping extends to an isomorphism from the algebra of polynomial differential operators in the variables \(\eta ^k\) onto that in the variables \(\xi _k\). The operator A will be mapped to the multiplication operator by the function \(\{\exp (\nu \xi _k D^k)\}f\) and the operator \(\eta ^p + \nu D^p\) will be mapped to
It is clear that the operators \(\{\exp (\nu \xi _k D^k)\}f\) and (22) commute, which concludes the proof of formula (20). Formula (21) can be proved similarly. \(\square \)
Denote by \({\mathcal I}\) the formal Berezin transform of the star product \(*\).
Corollary 4.1
Given functions f, g on M identified with their lifts to \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) via the natural projection, we have
Also, \({\mathcal I}f = f\).
Proof
Formula (23) follows from (20). Let \(U \subset M\) be a coordinate chart and \(a = a(z)\) and \(b = b(\bar{z})\) be a holomorphic and an antiholomorphic function on U, respectively, lifted to \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\). Then, formula (23) implies that
Since \({\mathcal I}\) is a formal differential operator, it follows that \({\mathcal I}f = f\) for any function f on M lifted to \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\). \(\square \)
Let \(U \subset M\) be a contractible coordinate chart. We set \(\mathbf {g} := \det (g_{kl})\) and denote by \(\log \mathbf {g}\) any branch of the logarithm of \(\mathbf {g}\) on U. Below we will calculate a supertrace density for the star product \(*\) on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\).
Lemma 4.1
The following formula holds,
Proof
Using Proposition 4.1 and a formula from (19),
we obtain the statement of the lemma from the calculation
\(\square \)
Proposition 4.2
The even superpotential \(X' : = - X + \log \mathbf {g}\) satisfies the following equations.
Proof
Using formulas (15), Proposition 4.1, and Lemma 4.1, we get that
The second equation in (25) can be proved similarly. The last four equations in (25) follow immediately from formulas (19) and Proposition 4.1. \(\square \)
Observe that \(\hbox {e}^{X + X'} = \mathbf {g}\). According to formula (16), Proposition 4.2 implies that
is a supertrace density for the product \(*\) on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\).
Denote by \(\gamma \) the global fiberwise (1, 1)-form on TM given in local coordinates by the formula
The global fiberwise volume form \(\gamma ^m\) on TM is given locally by a scalar multiple of \(\nu ^{-m}\mathbf {g}d\eta d\bar{\eta }\). We assume that \(\hbox {d}\beta = \hbox {d}z\hbox {d}\bar{z} \hbox {d}\theta \hbox {d}\bar{\theta }\) is the globally defined canonical Berezin density on \(\Pi TM\) Footnote 1. We introduce a global supertrace density of the star product \(*\) on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) by the formula
Lemma 4.2
For any formal functions F, G on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) such that F or G is compactly supported over TM the following identity holds,
Proof
It suffices to prove the lemma on a coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) for \(F \in (C^\infty _0(TU)[\theta ,\bar{\theta }])((\nu ))\) and \(G = b *a\), where \(a=a(z,\eta ,\theta )\) is holomorphic and \(b=b(\bar{z}, {\bar{\eta }},\bar{\theta })\) is antiholomorphic on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\). Then,
\(\square \)
In the rest of this section we fix a contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\) and a superpotential (18) on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\).
Lemma 4.3
The following identity holds,
Proof
We have, using (15), (20), (21), and (24),
whence the lemma follows. \(\square \)
One can construct a local \(\nu \)-derivation analogous to (11) for the star product \(*\) on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\),
Theorem 4.1
For any function \(F \in (C^\infty _0(TU)[\theta ,\bar{\theta }])((\nu ))\) the following identity holds,
Proof
We have by Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3,
\(\square \)
Remark
The statement of Theorem 4.1 remains valid if the derivation \(\delta \) is modified by an inner derivation, i.e., replaced with the derivation \(\delta + L_f - R_f\) for any \(f \in C^\infty (TU \oplus \Pi TU)((\nu ))\).
5 The standard filtration
Let M be a complex manifold and \(U \subset M\) be an open subset. Denote by \({\mathcal P}_k(U)\) the space of fiberwise homogeneous polynomial functions of degree k on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\). Then, the space \({\mathcal P}(U):=\prod _{k\ge 0} {\mathcal P}_k(U)\) of formal series \(f = f_0 + f_1 + \cdots \), where \(f_k \in {\mathcal P}_k(U)\), can be interpreted as the space of functions on the formal neighborhood of the zero section of the bundle \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\). If U is a coordinate chart, \({\mathcal P}(U)\) is identified with \(C^\infty (U)[[\eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }]]\). We set \({\mathcal Q}(U) := {\mathcal P}(U)((\nu ))\).
Given \(i \in \mathbb {Z}\), denote by \({\mathcal F}^i(U)\) the space of formal series of the form
where \(f_{r,k} \in {\mathcal P}_k(U)\). Since \({\mathcal F}^{i+1}(U) \subset {\mathcal F}^i(U)\), \(\{{\mathcal F}^i(U)\}\) is a descending filtration on the space
This filtration is induced by a grading \(\deg \) such that \(\deg \nu = 2\) and \(\deg f = k\) for \(f \in {\mathcal P}_k(U)\). We denote by \(\mathrm {fdeg} \, f\) the filtration degree of an element \(f \in {\mathcal F}(U)\). These filtration and grading will be called standard. We have \({\mathcal Q}(U) \subset {\mathcal F}(U)\) and set \({\mathcal Q}^i(U) := {\mathcal F}^i(U) \cap {\mathcal Q}(U)\). We say that an element (28) of \({\mathcal F}(U)\) is compactly supported over U if for each pair of indices r, k there exists a compact \(K_{r,k} \subset U\) such that \(f_{r,k}\) vanishes on
We will write \({\mathcal Q}:= {\mathcal Q}(M), {\mathcal F}:= {\mathcal F}(M)\), etc.
If U is a coordinate chart, a differential operator on \(C^\infty (U)[[\eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }]]\) has coefficients from that space and partial derivatives in the variables \(z, \bar{z}, \eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }\). One can define a differential operator on the space \({\mathcal P}\) using a partition of unity subject to a cover of M by coordinate charts. A natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\) is an operator \(A = A_0 + \nu A_1 + \cdots ,\) where \(A_r\) is a differential operator of order not greater than r on \({\mathcal P}\). Since in local coordinates \(\deg \partial /\partial \eta = \deg \partial /\partial {\bar{\eta }} =\deg \partial /\partial \theta =\deg \partial /\partial \bar{\theta }= -1\), we see that \(\hbox {fdeg }A_r \ge -r\).
Lemma 5.1
A natural formal differential operator A on the space \({\mathcal Q}\) is of standard filtration degree at least zero, \(A = A^0 + A^1 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i = i\). The homogeneous component \(A^i\) is a formal differential operator of order not greater than i. It can be written as
where \(\deg A_r^j = j\). The operator A naturally extends to the space \({\mathcal F}\) and respects the standard filtration.
Proof
Let \(A = A_0 + \nu A_1 + \cdots \) be a natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\). Since \(\hbox {fdeg }A_r \ge -r\), we have \(\hbox {fdeg }(\nu ^r A_r) \ge r\), whence it follows that \(\hbox {fdeg }A \ge 0\). Thus, we can write \(A = A^0 + A^1 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i = i\). Each differential operator \(A_r, r \ge 0,\) can be written as
where \(A_r^j\) is a differential operator of order not greater than r and with \(\deg A_r^j = j\). Then, we obtain that
which implies (29). We see that \(A^i\) is a formal differential operator of order not greater than i. Therefore, it acts upon the space \({\mathcal F}\) and raises the standard filtration degree by i. It follows that the operator A naturally extends to this space and respects the standard filtration. \(\square \)
Let A be a natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\) and
be an even element of \({\mathcal Q}\) treated as a multiplication operator with respect to the fiberwise Grassmann multiplication. Then, [K, A] is a natural operator on \({\mathcal Q}\) as well. We will consider two special cases when the series
defines a natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\).
Lemma 5.2
Let \(A = A_0 + \nu A_1 + \cdots \) be a natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\) and \(K \in {\mathcal Q}\) be an even element given by (30). Then, in the following two cases the operator (31) is natural:
-
(i)
if \(\hbox {fdeg }K \ge 0\);
-
(ii)
if \(\hbox {fdeg }K \ge -1\) and \(\deg A_r = 0\) for all r.
Proof
Since the operator A is natural, we have
Each summand
is a natural differential operator. Using in case (i) that \(\hbox {fdeg }A_r \ge -r\), we see that in both cases (i) and (ii) the filtration degree of (32) is at least r and the operator \(\hbox {e}^K A \hbox {e}^{-K}\) is given by a series convergent in the topology induced by the standard filtration. It is well defined on the space \({\mathcal Q}\), which implies the statement of the lemma. \(\square \)
Let \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables with classifying form \(\omega \) on a pseudo-Kähler manifold \((M, \omega _{-1})\) and \(*\) be the star product on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) defined by the local superpotentials (18) as in Sect. 4. The star product \(*\) induces a star product on \({\mathcal Q}\) which will be denoted by the same symbol. It was proved in [20] that a star product with separation of variables on a split supermanifold is natural. Therefore, for \(f=\nu ^p f_p + \nu ^{p+1}f_{p+1} +\cdots \in {\mathcal Q}\) the operators \(\nu ^{-p} L_f\) and \(\nu ^{-p} R_f\) on \({\mathcal Q}\) are natural, extend to the space \({\mathcal F}\), and respect the standard filtration. It follows that the operators \(L_f\) and \(R_f\) extend to \({\mathcal F}\) as well.
Proposition 5.1
The superalgebra \(({\mathcal Q},*)\) is a filtered algebra with respect to the standard filtration. The space \({\mathcal F}\) is a filtered superbimodule over the superalgebra \(({\mathcal Q},*)\).
Proof
It suffices to prove that the superalgebra \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) is a filtered algebra for U a coordinate chart and \({\mathcal F}(U)\) is a filtered bimodule over it. An element \(f \in C^\infty (U)\) identified with its lift to \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) lies in \({\mathcal Q}(U)\). One can see from formula (20) that the operator \(L_f\) leaves invariant \({\mathcal F}(U)\) and all filtration spaces \({\mathcal F}^i(U)\). The operators \({\mathcal L}_{\eta ^k} = \eta ^k\) and \(L_{\theta ^k} = \theta ^k\) leave invariant \({\mathcal F}(U)\) and increase the filtration degree by 1. It follows from formula (20) that
Using formula (24) we get that
Therefore, the operator \( L_{\bar{\theta }^l}\) leaves invariant \({\mathcal F}(U)\) and increases the filtration degree by 1. We have from (19) that
Using Corollary 4.1, we get that
where \(\Gamma _{kp}^s = g_{kp \bar{q}}g^{\bar{q}s}\) is the Christoffel symbol of the Levi-Civita connection.
Given a function \(f \in C^\infty (U)\), we see from (20) that the operator \(f - L_f\) increases the filtration degree by 1. It follows that the operator \(L_{g_{kq} {\bar{\eta }}^q}\) leaves invariant \({\mathcal F}(U)\) and increases the filtration degree by 1. We have from formula (20) that
It implies that the operator \(L_{{\bar{\eta }}^l }\) also leaves invariant \({\mathcal F}(U)\) and increases the filtration degree by 1. The elements of \(C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) and the variables \(\eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }\) generate the algebra \(({\mathcal Q}(U), *)\). Therefore, \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) is a filtered algebra and \({\mathcal F}(U)\) is a filtered left supermodule over \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\). Similar statements can be proved for the graded right \(*\)-multiplication operators which imply that \({\mathcal F}(U)\) is also a filtered right supermodule over \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\). \(\square \)
We will use the symbol \(*\) to denote the left and the right actions of the algebra \(({\mathcal Q}, *)\) on \({\mathcal F}\). Let \({\mathcal J}_r\) be the right submodule of \({\mathcal F}\) whose elements written in local coordinates are of the form
where \(A_k, B_k \in {\mathcal F}\), and let \({\mathcal J}_l\) be the left submodule of \({\mathcal F}\) whose elements are locally of the form
where \(C_l, D_l \in {\mathcal F}\). The definitions of the submodules \({\mathcal J}_l\) and \({\mathcal J}_r\) do not depend on the choice of local holomorphic coordinates.
6 The Lie superalgebra \(\langle {\chi },{\tilde{\chi }},{\sigma }\rangle \)
Let \((M, \omega _{-1})\) be a pseudo-Kähler manifold and \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on M with classifying form \(\omega \). Recall that the function \(\psi = \nu ^{-1}\psi _{-1}\) on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) was defined by (17). Let \(*\) be the star product with separation of variables on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) determined by the product \(\star \) and the function \(\psi \), as described in Sect. 4. In the rest of this paper we will use global functions
on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) given in local coordinates by the formulas
where \(\Phi \) is a potential of \(\omega \). Denote by \(\sigma \) the \(*\)-supercommutator of the odd functions \(\chi \) and \(\tilde{\chi }\),
The formal functions \(\chi , \tilde{\chi }\), and \(\sigma \) are formal analogues of symbols of the operators \(\bar{\partial }, \bar{\partial }^*\), and of the Laplace operator, respectively, on the \((0,*)\)-forms with values in a holomorphic line bundle on M used in the heat kernel proof of the index theorem for the Dirac operator \(\bar{\partial }+ \bar{\partial }^*\) (see [3]).
Proposition 6.1
The formal functions \(\chi \) and \(\tilde{\chi }\) are nilpotent with respect to the star product \(*\), \(\chi *\chi = 0\) and \(\tilde{\chi }*\tilde{\chi }=0\). Equivalently, they satisfy the supercommutator relations \([\chi ,\chi ]_*= 0\) and \([\tilde{\chi },\tilde{\chi }]_*= 0\). The formal function \(\sigma \) is given by the formula
In particular, \(\sigma \in {\mathcal Q}^0\).
Proof
Let \(U \subset M\) be a contractible coordinate chart. We get from formulas (24) and (33) that in local coordinates
We see from these formulas that
According to formula (20), for any function \(f \in C^\infty (U)\) we have
We obtain from these formulas that
Formula (35) follows from (36) and (37). \(\square \)
The functions \(\chi , \tilde{\chi }\), and \(\sigma \) form a basis in the Lie superalgebra \(\langle \chi ,\tilde{\chi },\sigma \rangle \) equipped with the supercommutator \([\cdot ,\cdot ]_*\). The element \(\sigma \) generates its supercenter. We define an element \(S = \nu ^{-1} S_{-1} \in {\mathcal Q}\) such that
The \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of \(\sigma \) of degree zero is \(-S\). One can show by a direct calculation that
Since \(\hbox {fdeg }\sigma = 0\), it follows from Proposition 5.1 that \(\mathrm {fdeg} L_\sigma =0\) and \(\mathrm {fdeg} R_\sigma =0\). One can see from (38) that the range of the operator \(L_\sigma \) lies in the submodule \({\mathcal J}_r\). Similarly, the range of the operator \(R_\sigma \) lies in the submodule \({\mathcal J}_l\). The series
are well-defined elements of \({\mathcal F}\). We have \(\deg S = \deg \hbox {e}^{\pm S} =0\). Denote by \({\mathcal E}\) and \(\bar{\mathcal E}\) the global holomorphic and antiholomorphic fiberwise Euler operators on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\), respectively. In local coordinates,
Let \(A^0\) and \(B^0\) denote the \(\deg \)-homogeneous components of degree zero of the operators \(L_\sigma \) and \(R_\sigma \), respectively. One can see from (38) and the corresponding formula for \(R_\sigma \) that
7 The subspace \({\mathcal K}\)
Lemma 7.1
The following statements hold.
-
(i)
If \(F \in {\mathcal J}_r\) and \(L_\sigma F =0\), then \(F=0\).
-
(ii)
If \(F \in {\mathcal J}_l\) and \(R_\sigma F =0\), then \(F=0\).
-
(iii)
If \(F \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\) and \((L_\sigma + R_\sigma ) F=0\), then \(F=0\).
Proof
Assume that \(F \in {\mathcal J}_r\) satisfies the equation \(L_\sigma F = 0\) and is nonzero. Then, there exists \(p \in \mathbb {Z}\) such that \(F = \sum _{i = p}^\infty F^i\), where \(\deg F^i = i\) and \(F^p\) is nonzero. We have \(A^0 F^p = 0\), where \(A^0\) is the zero degree component of \(L_\sigma \). We see from (39) that
Since \(F^p\) is a nonzero element of \({\mathcal J}_r\), we get that \(\hbox {e}^S F^p\) is also a nonzero element of \({\mathcal J}_r\), which contradicts (40). Statements (ii) and (iii) can be proved similarly. \(\square \)
The ranges of the operators \({\mathcal E}\) and \(\bar{\mathcal E}\) lie in the spaces \({\mathcal J}_r\) and \({\mathcal J}_l\), respectively. The restriction of the operator \({\mathcal E}\) to \({\mathcal J}_r\) is invertible. Denote by \({\mathcal E}^{-1} : {\mathcal J}_r \rightarrow {\mathcal J}_r\) its inverse. One can define similarly the operators \(\bar{\mathcal E}^{-1}: {\mathcal J}_l \rightarrow {\mathcal J}_l\) and \(({\mathcal E}+ \bar{\mathcal E})^{-1} : {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r \rightarrow {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\).
Lemma 7.2
Given \(G \in \ker {\mathcal E}\subset {\mathcal F}\) and \(H \in {\mathcal J}_r\), the equation
has a unique solution \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) such that \(F-G\in {\mathcal J}_r\),
Proof
Clearly, (42) is a solution of (41). Assume that F is a solution of (41) satisfying \(F-G\in {\mathcal J}_r\). Since \(S \in {\mathcal J}_r\), we have \(\hbox {e}^{S}F-G\in {\mathcal J}_r\). Therefore, \(\hbox {e}^{S}F-G = {\mathcal E}^{-1} H\), which implies the uniqueness. \(\square \)
Given \(G \in \ker \bar{\mathcal E}\subset {\mathcal F}\) and \(H \in {\mathcal J}_l\), the unique solution of the equation \( \bar{\mathcal E}\hbox {e}^S F = H\) is \(F = \hbox {e}^{-S}(G + \bar{\mathcal E}^{-1} H)\). Also, given \(G \in C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) and \(H \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\), one can find the unique solution of the equation \(({\mathcal E}+ \bar{\mathcal E}) \hbox {e}^S F = H\).
Proposition 7.1
Given an element \(G \in \ker {\mathcal E}\subset {\mathcal F}\), there exists a unique element \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) such that
If \(G = \sum _{i \ge p} G^i\), where \(\deg G^i = i\) and \(G^p\) is nonzero, then \(F = \sum _{i \ge p} F^i\), where \(\deg F^i = i\) and \(F^p = \hbox {e}^{-S}G^p\).
Proof
Assume that \(G = \sum _{i \ge p} G^i\) and \(G^p\) is nonzero. We will be looking for F of the form \(F = \sum _{i \ge p} F^i\) with \(F^i - G^i \in {\mathcal J}_r\) for \(i \ge p\). Writing \(L_\sigma = A^0 + A^1 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i = i\) and \(A^0 = \hbox {e}^{-S}(-{\mathcal E}) \hbox {e}^S\), we rewrite the equation \(L_\sigma F = 0\) as the system of equations
where the right-hand side of (43) is zero when \(k=p\). The condition that \(F - G \in {\mathcal J}_r\) is equivalent to the condition that \(F^k - G^k \in {\mathcal J}_r\) for all k. By Lemma 7.2, \(F^p = \hbox {e}^{-S}G^p\). Since the range of each operator \(A^i\) lies in \({\mathcal J}_r\), the terms \(\hbox {e}^S F^k\) for \(k > p\) can be uniquely determined by induction from system (43) using Lemma 7.2. The solution F is unique by Lemma 7.1. \(\square \)
One can prove similarly the following two propositions.
Proposition 7.2
Given an element \(G \in \ker \bar{\mathcal E}\subset {\mathcal F}\), there exists a unique element \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) such that
If \(G = \sum _{i \ge p} G^i\), where \(\deg G^i = i\) and \(G^p\) is nonzero, then \(F = \sum _{i \ge p} F^i\), where \(\deg F^i = i\) and \(F^p = \hbox {e}^{-S}G^p\).
Proposition 7.3
Given an element \(f \in C^\infty (M)((\nu )) \subset {\mathcal F}\), there exists a unique element \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) such that
If \(f = \sum _{r\ge p} \nu ^r f_r\), where \(f_r \in C^\infty (M)\) for \(r \ge p\) and \(f_p\) is nonzero, then \(F = \sum _{i \ge 2p} F^i\) and \(F^{2p} = \nu ^p \hbox {e}^{-S}f_p\).
Proposition 7.4
An element \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) satisfies the equation
if and only if it satisfies the equations
Proof
Equations (45) imply (44). Assume that condition (44) holds and set \(G := L_\sigma F\). Since the operators \(L_\sigma \) and \(R_\sigma \) commute, we have
Since the range of the operator \(L_\sigma \) lies in \({\mathcal J}_r \subset {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\), we obtain from part (iii) of Lemma 7.1 that \(L_\sigma F = 0\). One can prove similarly that \(R_\sigma F = 0\). \(\square \)
Theorem 7.1
The following conditions on \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) are equivalent:
-
(1)
\(L_\sigma F = 0\).
-
(2)
\(L_{\chi } F = 0 \text{ and } L_{\tilde{\chi }} F = 0\).
-
(3)
On any coordinate chart, \(L_{{\bar{\eta }}^l} F = 0 \text{ and } L_{\bar{\theta }^l} F = 0\) for all l.
Proof
Clearly, (3) \(\Rightarrow \) (1) and (2). Also, (2) \(\Rightarrow \) (1) because of the supercommutation relation \(\left[ \chi ,\tilde{\chi }\right] _*= \sigma \). Let us prove that (1) \(\Rightarrow \) (2). Set \(G:= L_{\chi } F\). We have
Locally,
hence \(G \in {\mathcal J}_r\). Lemma 7.1 implies that \(G= L_{\chi } F=0\). The statement that \( L_{\tilde{\chi }} F = 0\) can be proved similarly. It remains to prove that (1), (2) \(\Rightarrow \) (3). Recall that \(\psi \) is the function on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) given by (17). Assume that \(L_\sigma F=0\) and represent F as the sum
where \(F_i\) is such that \(\hbox {e}^\psi F_i\) is homogeneous of degree i in the variables \(\theta \). Inspecting (38), one can see that the operator \(\hbox {e}^\psi L_\sigma \hbox {e}^{-\psi }\) does not contain the variables \(\bar{\theta }\) and is of degree zero with respect to the variables \(\theta \). Since \(L_\sigma F=0\), it follows that
Therefore, \(L_\sigma F_i = 0\) for \(0 \le i \le m\). Clearly, \(F_i \in {\mathcal J}_r\) for \(i \ge 1\). By Lemma 7.1, the equation \( L_\sigma F_i = 0\) for \(i \ge 1\) has only the zero solution. Therefore, \(F = F_0\), so that \(\tilde{F}:=\hbox {e}^\psi F\) does not depend on the variables \(\theta \). We have for all p that
One gets from the formula \(\bar{\theta }^l = \nu g^{lk} *\left( \nu ^{-1}g_{kq}\bar{\theta }^q \right) \) that
In order to prove that \(L_{{\bar{\eta }}^l}F=0\), we use that \(L_{\tilde{\chi }}F = \theta ^p L_{\nu ^{-1} g_{pq} {\bar{\eta }}^q} F = 0\). We see from (33) that the operator
does not contain the variables \(\bar{\theta }\) and is of degree zero with respect to the variables \(\theta \). Since \(\tilde{F}=\hbox {e}^\psi F\) does not depend on the variables \(\theta \), the element
also does not depend on the variables \(\theta \) for any p. We have
hence \(W_p=0\) for all p. One can show as above that it implies that \(L_{{\bar{\eta }}^q} F = 0\) for all q. \(\square \)
One can prove similarly the following theorem.
Theorem 7.2
The following equations on \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) are equivalent:
-
(1)
\(R_\sigma F = 0\).
-
(2)
\(R_{\chi } F = 0 \text{ and } R_{\tilde{\chi }} F = 0\).
-
(3)
On any coordinate chart, \(R_{\eta ^k} F = 0 \text{ and } R_{\theta ^k} F = 0\) for all k.
For any open subset \(U \subset M\) we denote by \({\mathcal K}(U)\) the subspace of \({\mathcal F}(U)\) of elements F satisfying the following equivalent conditions:
-
(a)
\((L_\sigma + R_\sigma ) F = 0\);
-
(b)
\(L_\sigma F = 0\) and \(R_\sigma F = 0\);
-
(c)
On any coordinate chart on U, \({\bar{\eta }}^l *F = \bar{\theta }^l *F = F *\eta ^k = F *\theta ^k = 0\).
According to Proposition 7.3, for every element \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) there exists a unique element \(F \in {\mathcal K}(U)\) such that \(F - f \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\). It will be denoted by \(K_f\). The mapping \(f \mapsto K_f\) is a bijection from \(C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) onto \({\mathcal K}(U)\). We set \({\mathcal K}:= {\mathcal K}(M)\).
Lemma 7.3
Assume that \(f,g \in C^\infty (M)((\nu )), G \in {\mathcal F},\) and \(G - g \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\). Then,
Proof
One can write in local coordinates
for some \(A_k, B_l, C_k, D_l \in {\mathcal F}\). We have
Therefore, \(K_f *G = K_f *g \mod {\mathcal J}_l\). The second statement can be proved similarly. \(\square \)
We introduce the following notation,
We have \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\). One can prove a stronger statement.
Proposition 7.5
The element \(\varepsilon \) is such that \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\).
Proof
It follows from Proposition 7.1 that there exists a unique element \(F \in {\mathcal F}\) such that \(L_\sigma F = 0\) and
Set \(G := R_\sigma F\). Since \(\sigma \in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\) and \({\mathcal J}_r\) is a right submodule, we obtain from (46) that \(G = R_\sigma F \in {\mathcal J}_r\). We also have that
Lemma 7.1 implies that \(G = R_\sigma F = 0\), whence \(F \in {\mathcal K}\). We see from (46) that \(F = \varepsilon \) and therefore \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_r\). One can prove similarly that \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l\). \(\square \)
Theorem 7.3
There exists an even element
such that \(\varepsilon = \hbox {e}^{-(S +\varkappa )}\) and \(\mathrm {fdeg} \, \varkappa \ge 1\).
Proof
It follows from Propositions 7.3 and 7.5 that \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\), \(\mathrm {fdeg} \, \varepsilon = 0\), and the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of \(\varepsilon \) of degree zero is \(\hbox {e}^{-S}\). Therefore, there exists an element \(\varkappa \in {\mathcal F}\) such that \(\varepsilon = \hbox {e}^{-(S+\varkappa )},\ \varkappa \in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\), and \(\mathrm {fdeg} \, \varkappa \ge 1\). We will write \(\varkappa = \varkappa ^1 + \varkappa ^2 + \cdots \), where \(\deg \varkappa ^i = i\). We will prove by induction on i that the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(\varkappa ^i\) as at least \(-1\). Since the star product \(*\) is natural, the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(\nu \sigma \) is zero, and \(\mathrm {fdeg} \, (\nu \sigma )=2\), we get that the operator \(\nu (L_\sigma + R_\sigma )\) is natural and \(\hbox {fdeg }\nu (L_\sigma + R_\sigma ) = 2\). By Lemma 5.2, the operator
is natural. Since \(\hbox {fdeg }C =2\), we can write \(C = C^2 + C^3 + \cdots \), where \(\deg C^i = i\). By Lemma 5.1, \(C^i\) is a differential operator of order not greater than i. It follows from Eq. (39) that
The condition that \((L_\sigma + R_\sigma )\varepsilon =0\) implies that \((\hbox {e}^\varkappa C \hbox {e}^{-\varkappa })\mathbf{{1}}=0\). We rewrite this equation as follows,
Extracting the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of degree 3 from (47), we get
Since the range of the operator C lies in \({\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\), we obtain that
whence the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(\varkappa ^1\) is at least -1. Now assume that for \(d >1\) the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(\varkappa ^i\) is at least \(-1\) for all \(i < d\). Extracting the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of degree \(d+2\) from (47), we get that
Equation (48) contains \(\varkappa ^i\) for \(i \le d\). The only summand in (48) containing \(\varkappa ^{d}\) is
By the induction assumption, the other summands in (48) are of \(\nu \)-filtration degree at least zero. Since all other summands in Eq. (48) lie in \({\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\), the element \(\varkappa ^d\) is uniquely determined by this equation and its \(\nu \)-filtration degree is at least \(-1\), which implies the statement of the theorem. \(\square \)
8 The algebras \({\mathcal A}\) and \({\mathcal B}\)
Let \((M, \omega _{-1})\) be a pseudo-Kähler manifold and \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on M with classifying form \(\omega \). In this section we fix a contractible coordinate chart \(U \subset M\). Let \(\Phi _{-1}\) and \(\Phi \) be potentials of \(\omega _{-1}\) and \(\omega \) on U, respectively, \(g_{kl}\) be the metric tensor given by (6), and \(*\) be the star product with separation of variables on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) determined by the potential (18) written as
where
In this section we will define two subalgebras, \({\mathcal A}\) and \({\mathcal B}\), of the algebra \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) and describe their action on the space \({\mathcal K}(U)\).
We lift differential operators on U to \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) using the trivialization \(TU \oplus \Pi TU \cong U \times \mathbb {C}^{m|m}\) induced by the choice of local coordinates on U. Their lifts commute with the multiplication operators by the variables \(\eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }\) and the operators \(\partial /\partial \eta , \partial /\partial \bar{\eta }, \partial /\partial \theta ,\partial /\partial \bar{\theta }\).
Lemma 8.1
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), the operators
are a left and a right \(*\)-multiplication operators on the space \({\mathcal Q}(U)\), respectively.
Proof
We have \(Y \in {\mathcal Q}^{-1}(U)\) and \(\hbox {fdeg }L^\star _f = \hbox {fdeg }R^\star _f = \hbox {fdeg }f\). If the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of f is p, then, according to Lemmas 5.2 and 5.1, the even formal differential operators \(\nu ^{-p}\hbox {e}^{-Y} L_f^\star \hbox {e}^Y\) and \(\nu ^{-p}\hbox {e}^{-Y} R_f^\star \hbox {e}^Y\) are natural and act on \({\mathcal Q}(U)\) and \({\mathcal F}(U)\). The operator \(\hbox {e}^{-Y} L_f^\star \hbox {e}^Y\) commutes with the multiplication operators by the antiholomorphic variables \(\bar{z},{\bar{\eta }},\) and \(\bar{\theta }\) and the operators
Therefore, it is a left \(*\)-multiplication operator on the space \({\mathcal Q}(U)\). Similarly, \(\hbox {e}^{-Y} R_f^\star \hbox {e}^Y\) is a right \(*\)-multiplication operator on \({\mathcal Q}(U)\). \(\square \)
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), we define two even elements of \({\mathcal Q}(U)\),
We have
whence it follows that \(\alpha ,\beta : (C^\infty (U)((\nu )),\star ) \rightarrow ({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) are injective homomorphisms. Their images are subalgebras of \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) which will be denoted by \({\mathcal A}\) and \({\mathcal B}\), respectively.
Lemma 8.2
For \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\),
Proof
The lemma follows directly from the definitions of \(\alpha (f)\) and \(\beta (f)\). \(\square \)
Lemma 8.3
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), the element \(\alpha (f)\) \(*\)-commutes with the variables \({\bar{\eta }}\) and \(\bar{\theta }\) and \(\beta (f)\) \(*\)-commutes with \(\eta \) and \(\theta \).
Proof
The operator \(R_f^\star \) commutes with the variables \({\bar{\eta }}\) and \(\bar{\theta }\). Therefore, \( R_{\alpha (f)} = \hbox {e}^{-Y} R_f^\star \hbox {e}^Y\) commutes with the operators \(R_{{\bar{\eta }}^l} = {\bar{\eta }}^l\) and \(R_{\bar{\theta }^l} = \bar{\theta }^l\). It follows that \(\alpha (f)\) \(*\)-commutes with the variables \({\bar{\eta }}\) and \(\bar{\theta }\). Similarly, \(\beta (f)\) \(*\)-commutes with \(\eta \) and \(\theta \). \(\square \)
Corollary 8.1
The left action of the algebra \({\mathcal A}\) and the right action of the algebra \({\mathcal B}\) on \({\mathcal F}(U)\) leave \({\mathcal K}(U)\) invariant.
Proof
The corollary follows immediately from the definition of the space \({\mathcal K}(U)\). \(\square \)
Lemma 8.4
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\),
Proof
By Proposition 7.5, \(\varepsilon - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l\), whence \(\alpha (f) *\varepsilon - \alpha (f) \in {\mathcal J}_l \subset {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\). We get from Lemma 8.2 that \(\alpha (f) *\varepsilon - f \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\) which, according to Corollary 8.1, implies the first equation in (49). The proof of the second equality is similar. \(\square \)
Proposition 8.1
Given \(f,g \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\),
Proof
We have
The proof of the second equality is similar. \(\square \)
Corollary 8.2
Given \(f,g \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\),
Proof
Since \(\alpha (f) - f \in {\mathcal J}_l +{\mathcal J}_r\), we have by Lemma 7.3 that
The proof of the second statement is similar. \(\square \)
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), we denote by \(\tilde{\alpha }(f)\) the element of \({\mathcal Q}(U)\) which does not depend on the variables \({\bar{\eta }},\bar{\theta }\) and is such that \(\alpha (f) - \tilde{\alpha }(f) \in {\mathcal J}_l\), that is,
We get from Lemma 8.2 that \(\tilde{\alpha }(f) - f \in {\mathcal J}_r\). Then, for \(g \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) we have
We define similarly an element \(\tilde{\beta }(f) := \beta (f)|_{\eta =\theta =0}\) of \({\mathcal Q}(U)\) which satisfies the condition \(\tilde{\beta }(f)-f \in {\mathcal J}_l\) and is such that
Then, we introduce an element
Proposition 8.2
Given \(f,g \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\),
Proof
We have from (50) and (51) that
\(\square \)
9 An evolution equation
Lemma 9.1
Given a nonzero complex number k and a nonnegative integer l, the equation
has a unique polynomial solution
Proof
Equation (53) is equivalent to the following one,
Since \(k \ne 0\), it can be rewritten as follows,
Using the identity
we see that for the polynomial (54),
Since \(k \ne 0\), the homogeneous equation
has no nonzero polynomial solutions. Therefore, (54) is a unique polynomial solution of (53). \(\square \)
We consider the solutions of the evolution equation
on the space \({\mathcal F}\) of the form \(F(t) = F^{k}(t) + F^{k+1}(t) + \cdots \), where \(k \in \mathbb {Z}\) and \(\deg F^i(t) =i\) for \(i \ge k\). Each \(\deg \)-homogeneous component \(F^i(t)\) of F admits an expansion in the powers of \(\nu \),
where \(({\mathcal E}+ \bar{\mathcal E})F_r^j(t) = j F_r^j(t)\).
It follows from formula (35) that the operator \(L_{\nu \sigma }\) is natural and \(\hbox {fdeg }L_{\nu \sigma } = 2\), so that \(L_{\nu \sigma } = A^2 + A^3 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i=i\) and \(A^2 = - \nu ({\mathcal E}+ S) = \hbox {e}^{-S} (-\nu {\mathcal E}) \hbox {e}^S\). Observe that
Lemma 9.2
Equation (55) has a unique solution F(t) with the initial condition \(F(0) = 0\), the zero solution.
Proof
Assume that \(F(t) = \sum _{i \ge p} F^i(t)\) with \(\deg F^i (t) = i\) and nonzero \(F^p(t)\) is a nontrivial solution of (55) with the initial condition \(F(0) = 0\). Then,
We have from (57) that
Therefore, \(\hbox {e}^{t{\mathcal E}} \hbox {e}^S F^p(t)\) does not depend on t. Since \(F^p(0) = 0\), it follows that \(\hbox {e}^{t{\mathcal E}} \hbox {e}^S F^p(t) = 0\) for all t, whence \(F^p(t) =0\) for all t. This contradiction proves the lemma. \(\square \)
Theorem 9.1
Equation (55) with the initial condition \(F(0) = \mathbf{{1}}\) on the space \({\mathcal F}\) has a unique solution, \(F(t) = F^0(t) + F^1(t) + \ldots \), where \(\deg F^i (t) = i\) and
The component \(F^i(t)\) can be expressed as (56), where for each pair (j, r) the function \(F_r^j(t)\) is a finite sum
such that \(({\mathcal E}+ \bar{\mathcal E})F_{r, k, l}^j = j F_{r, k, l}^j\) and \(F_{r, k, l}^j = 0\) if \(k =0\) and \(l > 0\). In particular,
Proof
We will be looking for a solution F(t) of filtration degree zero. Equation (55) can be rewritten as the system
with the initial conditions \(F^0(0) = \mathbf{{1}}\) and \(F^l(0)=0\) for \(l > 0\). For \(l=0\) the right-hand side of (58) is zero. We have from formulas (57) and (58) that
Thus, \(\hbox {e}^{t{\mathcal E}} \hbox {e}^S F^0(t)\) does not depend on t. Since \(F^0(0) = \mathbf{{1}}\), we have
It follows that
We will prove the theorem by induction on i. We see from (60) that the statement of the theorem holds for \(i=0\). Assume that it holds for all \(i < l\) for \(l \ge 1\). Since \(F^l(0)=0\) for \(l \ge 1\), we obtain from (59) that
According to Lemma 5.1, the operator \(A^j\) can be written as
where \(\deg A_r^k = k\). The component \(F_r^{l-2r}(t)\) of \(F^l(t)\) will be expressed as the sum
where
and the sum in (62) is over the tuples (i, a, b, u, v) such that
In particular, this sum is finite. According to the induction assumption, the function \(F_v^{l-i-2v}(\tau )\) in (63) is a finite sum of expressions
where \(P\in C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)\) is polynomial on fibers, \(k, l \ge 0\), and the condition \(k=0\) implies that \(l=0\). Consider the contribution of one such expression to (63),
We see from (38) that for every pair (r, j), the range of the differential operator \(A_r^j\) lies in \({\mathcal J}_r\). Therefore, \(A_u^{i+2-2u} P\) can be represented as a finite sum
of fiberwise polynomial functions \(Q_j\) such that \({\mathcal E}P = jP\). Consider the contribution of one such function \(Q_j\) to (64),
Set
If \(b-k+j =0\), then
Since \(b \ge 0\) and \(j \ge 1\), we see that \(b+j \ge 1\). If \(b-k+j \ne 0\), then, according to Lemma 9.1, there exists a polynomial \(p(\tau )\) such that
It follows that
If \(k=0\), then \(l=0\) and
We have thus shown that all summands contributing to \(F_r^{l-2r}(t)\) satisfy the conditions of Theorem 9.1. Thus, F(t) exists and satisfies the conditions of the theorem. By Lemma 9.2, it is a unique solution of (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\). \(\square \)
Proposition 9.1
If F(t) is the solution of Eq. (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\) and W is an element of the Lie superalgebra \(\langle \chi ,\tilde{\chi },\sigma \rangle \), then
The function F(t) is a unique solution of the equation
with the initial condition \(F(0) = \mathbf{{1}}\).
Proof
We use the fact that \(\sigma \) lies in the supercenter of \(\langle \chi ,\tilde{\chi },\sigma \rangle \). Set
We have
and
Lemma 9.2 implies that G is the zero function, i.e., \(L_W F(t) = R_W F(t)\). Therefore, F(t) is a solution of Eq. (65) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\). The uniqueness of this solution can be proved as the uniqueness in Theorem 9.1. \(\square \)
Lemma 9.3
The solution F(t) of Eq. (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\) satisfies the property that \(F(t) - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\) for every value of t.
Proof
Since the range of the operator \(L_\sigma \) lies in \({\mathcal J}_r\), Eq. (55) implies that
Since \(F(0) = \mathbf{{1}}\), it follows that \(F(t)- \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_r\). Since the range of the operator \(R_\sigma \) lies in \({\mathcal J}_l\), we see that Eq. (65) similarly implies that \(F(t) - \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l\). \(\square \)
Theorem 9.2
If F(t) is the solution of the evolution equation (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\), then
Proof
The limit in (66) exists by Theorem 9.1. Denote it temporarily by Z. It follows from Lemma 9.3 that \(Z- \mathbf{{1}}\in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\). To prove the theorem it remains to show that \(L_\sigma Z = 0\). We write
where for each pair (j, r) the \(\deg \)-homogeneous element \(F_r^j(t)\) of degree j is expressed as a finite sum
such that \(F^j_{r,k,l} \in C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)\) is polynomial on fibers, \(\deg F^j_{r,k,l}=j\), and \(F^j_{r,k,l}=0\) for \(k=0\) and \(l\ge 1\). In particular,
Therefore, for any pair (j, r) we have that
The operator \(L_{\nu \sigma }\) is a natural operator of filtration degree 2. According to Lemma 5.1,
where \(\deg A_r^j = j\). Equation (55) is equivalent to the system
where the summation is over the tuples (j, k, p, q) satisfying the conditions \(j+k = i+2, p+q = r+1, j \ge 2, 0 \le p \le j, k \ge 0, q \le \lfloor k/2 \rfloor \). In particular, the sum in (67) is finite. Taking the limit as \(t \rightarrow \infty \) of both sides of (67) we obtain a system equivalent to the equation \(L_\sigma Z = 0\). It follows from Proposition 7.1 that \(Z = \varepsilon \). \(\square \)
Let \(F(t) = F^0(t) + F^1(t) + \cdots \) be the solution of Eq. (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\). According to Theorem 9.1,
There exists a function \(G(t) = G^0(t) + G^1(t) + \cdots \), where \(\deg G^i(t)=i\), such that \(\exp G(t) = F(t), \ G(0)=0\), and
Lemma 9.3 implies that \(G(t) \in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\).
Theorem 9.3
The \(\nu \)-filtration degree of the function G(t) is \(-1\).
Proof
We will prove by induction on i that for every \(i \ge 0\) the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of the function \(G^i = G^i(t)\) is at least \(-1\). This is true for \(i=0\). Assume that this is true for \(i < p\). Rewrite equation (55) in terms of G,
Since \(\hbox {fdeg }\sigma = 0\), one can write \(L_\sigma = A^0 + A^1 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i = i\). According to (39),
Extract the component of (68) of degree p:
The summands on the right-hand side of (69) containing \(G^p\) have all but one \(i_j = 0\) and \(l=0\). They add up to
Equation (69) can be written as
where \(H^p\) is the sum of all terms on the right-hand side of (69) which do not contain \(G^p\). One can rewrite (70) as follows,
Since the range of the operator \(L_\sigma \) lies in \({\mathcal J}_r\), we have that \(H^p \in {\mathcal J}_r\) and therefore
Using the induction assumption and the fact that the operator \(\nu L_\sigma \) is natural, it is easy to check that the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(H^p\) is at least \(-1\). Therefore, the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(G^p\) is also at least \(-1\), which concludes the induction proof. \(\square \)
10 Oscillatory symbols
Given an open set \(U \subset M\), let \(\hat{\mathcal P}(U)\) denote the subspace of \({\mathcal F}(U)\) of elements of the form
where \(p, r_p \in \mathbb {Z}\) and \(f_{r,i} \in {\mathcal P}_{i-2r}(U)\). We set \(\hat{\mathcal P}:= \hat{\mathcal P}(M)\). One can check using Lemma 5.1 that a natural formal differential operator on \({\mathcal Q}\) extended to \({\mathcal F}\) leaves invariant \(\hat{\mathcal P}\). We define an oscillatory symbol F as an element of \({\mathcal F}\) which admits a representation
where \(G \in \hat{\mathcal P}\) and h is a global function on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) such that in local coordinates \(h = \nu ^{-1}h_{kl}(z, \bar{z}) \eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l\) and \(\left( h_{kl}(z, \bar{z})\right) \) is an \(m \times m\)-matrix nondegenerate at every point \((z,\bar{z})\). We denote by \({\mathcal O}\) the space of oscillatory symbols in \({\mathcal F}\). It is a union of linear spaces \({\mathcal O}_h\) of oscillatory symbols with a fixed function h. For any open subset \(U \subset M\) one can similarly define the space \({\mathcal O}(U)\) of oscillatory symbols in \({\mathcal F}(U)\).
Lemma 10.1
A nonzero oscillatory symbol \(F \in {\mathcal O}\) has a unique representation (72).
Proof
Suppose that a nonzero element \(F \in {\mathcal O}\) has two representations of the form (72),
Since \(\deg h = \deg \tilde{h}=0\), we can assume that F is \(\deg \)-homogeneous. Then, \(\deg G = \deg \tilde{G} = \deg F\) and \(G, \tilde{G}\) are formal functions on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) polynomial on fibers whose \(\nu \)-degree is bounded below and above. We obtain the equality
which holds if and only if \(h = \tilde{h}\) and \(G = \tilde{G}\). \(\square \)
Lemma 10.2
A natural formal differential operator A on the space \({\mathcal Q}\) extended to \({\mathcal F}\) leaves invariant each space \({\mathcal O}_h\) of oscillatory symbols, i.e., given an element \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G \in {\mathcal O}\), there exists an element \(\tilde{G} \in \hat{\mathcal P}\) such that
Proof
By Lemma 5.2, the operator \(\hbox {e}^{h} A \hbox {e}^{- h}\) is natural and therefore leaves invariant the space \(\hat{\mathcal P}\). We have \(\tilde{G} = \left( \hbox {e}^{h} A \hbox {e}^{- h}\right) G\). \(\square \)
Let h, w be global functions on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) given in local coordinates by the formulas \(h = \nu ^{-1} h_{kl}(z, \bar{z})\eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l\) and \(w = \nu ^{-1}w_{kl}(z, \bar{z})\theta ^k \bar{\theta }^l\), where \((h_{kl})\) is a nondegenerate matrix. Assume that \(H \in {\mathcal J}_l \cap {\mathcal J}_r\) is an even element whose \(\nu \)-filtration degree as at least \(-1\), \(\hbox {fdeg }H = 0\), and the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of H of degree zero is \(h + w\).
Lemma 10.3
We have \(\hbox {e}^{-H} \in {\mathcal O}\).
Proof
One can write
where \(\tilde{H} \in {\mathcal Q}^1\) and the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(\tilde{H}\) is at least \(-1\). Set
Since \(\exp \{-\tilde{H}\} \in \hat{\mathcal P}\) and w is nilpotent, we see that \(G \in \hat{\mathcal P}\). Now,
whence the lemma follows. \(\square \)
Proposition 10.1
For any \(f \in C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) we have \(K_f \in {\mathcal O}\). For any \(t \ge 0\) we have \(F(t) \in {\mathcal O}\).
Proof
The proposition follows from Lemma 10.3 and Theorems 7.3 and 9.3. \(\square \)
Assume that, as above, a global function h on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) is given in local coordinates by the formula \(h = \nu ^{-1}h_{kl}(z, \bar{z})\eta ^k {\bar{\eta }}^l\), where \((h_{kl})\) is a nondegenerate matrix at every point \((z, \bar{z})\). Then, there exists a global differential operator \(\Delta _h\) on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) given in local coordinates by the formula
where \( \left( h^{lk}\right) \) is the matrix inverse to \(\left( h_{kl}\right) \). There exists a fiberwise endomorphism \(\Lambda _h\) of the holomorphic cotangent bundle of M given in local coordinates by the formula
where \(g_{kl}\) is the pseudo-Kähler metric tensor. Let
denote the restriction mapping to the zero section of the vector bundle \(TM \oplus \Pi TM \rightarrow \Pi TM\) (we identify the zero section with \(\Pi TM\)). In local coordinates, \(\zeta (F) = F|_{\eta ={\bar{\eta }}=0}\). Define a global mapping
by the formula
Since \(\deg \left( \Delta _h\right) =0\), the operator \(\exp \{\Delta _h\}\) acts upon each homogeneous component of G as a differential operator of finite order. Let \(G^j\) be the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of G of degree j. It follows that \(\deg T_h(G^j) = j\). Since in local coordinates \(T_h(G^j)\) does not depend on the variables \(\eta , {\bar{\eta }}\), the \(\nu \)-filtration degree of \(T_h(G^j)\) is bounded below by \(j/2 - m\), which implies that the \(\nu \)-degree of \(T_h(G)\) is bounded below. Therefore, the mapping \(T_h\) is well defined. One can interpret (74) as a fiberwise formal oscillatory integral on the vector bundle \(TM \oplus \Pi TM \rightarrow \Pi TM\),
where \(\gamma \) is given by (26). If \(h_{kl}\) is a Hermitian metric tensor, \(\nu \) is a positive number, and \(G \in C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)\) is fiberwise polynomial, then the integral in (75) converges to the right-hand side.
Let \(U \subset M\) be a coordinate chart. Recall that \(\mathbf {g} = \det (g_{kl})\) and \(\log \mathbf {g}\) is any branch of the logarithm of \(\mathbf {g}\) on U. Define similarly \(\mathbf {h} := \det (h_{kl})\) and \(\log \mathbf {h}\).
Theorem 10.1
Let \(f \in C^\infty (\Pi TU)((\nu ))\) and \(G \in \hat{\mathcal P}(U)\). The following identities hold true:
-
(1)
\(T_h\left( f G \right) = f T_h\left( G \right) \);
-
(2)
\(T_h\left( \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial \eta ^p}- \nu ^{-1}h_{pl}{\bar{\eta }}^l\right) G \right) = 0\);
-
(3)
\(T_h\left( \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial {\bar{\eta }}^q}- \nu ^{-1}h_{kq}\eta ^k\right) G \right) = 0\);
-
(4)
\(\frac{\hbox {d}}{\hbox {d}\nu }T_h\left( G \right) = T_h\left( \left( \frac{\hbox {d}}{\hbox {d}\nu } + \frac{h}{\nu } - \frac{m}{\nu }\right) G \right) \).
-
(5)
\(\frac{\partial }{\partial z^p}T_h\left( G\right) = T_h\left( \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial z^p} - \frac{\partial h}{\partial z^p} + \frac{\partial }{\partial z^p} \log \mathbf {g}\right) G\right) \);
-
(6)
\(\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{z}^q}T_h\left( G\right) = T_h\left( \left( \frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{z}^q} - \frac{\partial h}{\partial \bar{z}^q} + \frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{z}^q} \log \mathbf {g}\right) G\right) \);
-
(7)
\(\frac{\partial }{\partial \theta ^p}T_h\left( G \right) = T_h\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial \theta ^p} G \right) \);
-
(8)
\(\frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{\theta }^q}T_h\left( G \right) = T_h\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial \bar{\theta }^q} G \right) \).
-
(9)
\(\frac{\partial }{\partial h_{kl}}T_h\left( G \right) = T_h\left( - \frac{1}{\nu }\eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l G \right) \).
Proof
Statements (1), (7), and (8) are trivial. We prove (2) as follows:
Statement (3) can be proved similarly. To prove (4), we observe that
It remains to show that \(T_h\left( \Delta _h G \right) = T_h\left( \left( h - m\right) G \right) \). This identity readily follows from items (1), (2), and (3). We prove (5) as follows:
Now it remains to show that
This equality can be derived from items (1), (2), (3), and the formula
Identity (6) can be proved similarly. In order to show (9), we use the formula
to prove that
and then use formulas (2) and (3). \(\square \)
This theorem justifies the interpretation of the mapping \(T_h\) as a formal oscillatory integral. Identities (2) and (3) can be obtained by integrating the formal integral in (75) by parts and identities (4)–(9) can be obtained by differentiating it with respect to a parameter.
Let \(U \subset M\) be a coordinate chart, \((h_{kl})\) be a nondegenerate \(m \times m\)-matrix with elements from \(C^\infty (U)\), and \((\alpha _{kl})\) be a matrix with even nilpotent elements from \(C^\infty (U)[\theta ,\bar{\theta }]\). Suppose that f is a smooth function in \(m^2\) complex variables such that the composition
is defined. Then, one can define the composition of f with the functions \(h_{kl} + \alpha _{kl}\) using the Taylor series of f which terminates due to the nilpotency of \(\alpha _{kl}\),
We set \(h:= \nu ^{-1}h_{kl}\eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l\) and \(\alpha := \nu ^{-1}\alpha _{kl}\eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l\). Given \(\hbox {e}^{- h}G \in {\mathcal O}(U)\), we can rewrite it as
Also, we can define the matrix \(\Lambda _{h + \alpha }\), the operator \(\Delta _{h + \alpha }\), and the mapping \(T_{h+\alpha }\) by the same formulas, because the matrix \((h_{kl} + \alpha _{kl})\) is invertible. The formal oscillatory integral (75) should not change if we rewrite the integrand as (76). This is indeed the case.
Lemma 10.4
Given \(G \in \hat{\mathcal P}(U)\), the following identity holds:
Proof
Using Theorem 10.1 (9), we get that
\(\square \)
This lemma holds true in the global setting when h and \(\alpha \) are defined on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) and \(G \in \hat{\mathcal P}\).
Suppose that an element \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G \in {\mathcal O}\) is compactly supported over M. We define a formal integral of \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G\) with respect to the density \(\mu \) given in (27) as follows,
We want to show that this formal integral is a supertrace functional on the space of formal oscillatory symbols \({\mathcal O}\) with respect to the action of the algebra \(({\mathcal Q},*)\).
Let A be a differential operator on the space \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\). There exists a differential operator \(A^t\), the transpose of A, on that space such that for any \(f,g \in C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)\) with f or g compactly supported over TM the following identity holds,
The mapping \(A \mapsto A^t\) is involutive and has the property that
If A is a multiplication operator by a function with respect to the fiberwise Grassmann product, then \(A ~= ~A^t\). In local coordinates we have
The mapping \(A \mapsto A^t\) induces a transposition mapping on the differential operators on the space \({\mathcal P}\) . The transpose operator of a differential operator A on \({\mathcal P}\) will be denoted also by \(A^t\).
Proposition 10.2
Given \(f \in {\mathcal Q}\) and \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G \in {\mathcal O}\) such that f or G is compactly supported over M, then for any differential operator A on \({\mathcal Q}\) we have
Proof
We will prove the proposition on a coordinate chart \(U \subset M\). To prove (78) for \(A = \partial /\partial \eta ^p\) we verify the identity
We have
by item (2) of Theorem 10.1. Identity (78) for \(A = \partial /\partial {\bar{\eta }}^q\) follows from item (3) of Theorem 10.1. To prove (78) for \(A = \partial /\partial \theta ^p\) we verify the identity
Using item (7) of Theorem 10.1, we have that
One can similarly verify (78) for \(A = \partial /\partial \bar{\theta }^q, \partial /\partial z^p,\) and \(\partial /\partial \bar{z}^q\) using items (8), (5), and (6) of Theorem 10.1, respectively. Now the statement of the Proposition follows from (77). \(\square \)
Theorem 10.2
Given \(f \in {\mathcal Q}\) and \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G \in {\mathcal O}\), where G is compactly supported over M, the following identity holds,
Proof
The condition that \(\mu \) is a trace density for the star product \(*\) on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) is equivalent to the condition that
for any \(f \in C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)((\nu ))\). Therefore, (79) holds for any \(f \in {\mathcal Q}\). By Proposition 10.2,
\(\square \)
We introduce a functional \(\tau \) on the compactly supported formal functions on M by the formula
It follows from Proposition 10.1 that it is well defined. Using partition of unity, Proposition 8.2, and Theorem 10.2 one can show that \(\tau \) is a trace functional on the algebra \((C^\infty (M)((\nu )),\star )\).
Theorem 10.3
Assume that the manifold M is compact and F(t) is the solution of (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\). Then, the identity
holds for all \(t \ge 0\).
Proof
According to Proposition 10.1, the formal integral in (80) is well defined. Using evolution equation (55), Proposition 9.1, and Theorem 10.2 we get
Therefore, the integral in (80) does not depend on t. Now the statement of the theorem follows from Theorem 9.2. \(\square \)
11 Identification of the trace functional \(\tau \)
In this section we will prove that for any contractible open subset \(U \subset M\) there exists a constant \(c \in \mathbb {C}\) such that
for all \(f \in C_0^\infty (U)((\nu ))\). The local \(\nu \)-derivation
for the star product \(*\) on \(TU \oplus \Pi TU\) induces a derivation on the algebra \(({\mathcal Q}(U),*)\) which we also denote by \(\delta \). Moreover, the action of \(\delta \) on \({\mathcal Q}(U)\) extends to \({\mathcal F}(U)\) so that the Leibniz rule holds. Namely, for \(f \in {\mathcal Q}(U)\) and \(g \in {\mathcal F}(U)\),
We will modify the derivation \(\delta \) by an inner derivation so that the resulting derivation will leave invariant the subspace \({\mathcal K}(U) \subset {\mathcal F}(U)\). Set
and define
Theorem 11.1
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), we have that
where
is a derivation of \((C^\infty (U)((\nu )),\star )\).
Proof
First we will prove that the space \({\mathcal K}(U)\) is invariant under the action of \(\tilde{\delta }\). We have
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), we get using (51) that
Thus, \(\tilde{\delta }({\bar{\eta }}^l) *K_f =0\). One can prove similarly that \(\tilde{\delta }(\bar{\theta }^l) *K_f = 0\). Next,
Given \(f \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\), we have using (51) that
Similarly, \(K_f *\tilde{\delta }(\theta ^k) = 0\). It follows that
We prove along the same lines that
Therefore, \(\tilde{\delta }(K_f) \in {\mathcal K}(U)\). Now we need to find an element \(g \in C^\infty (U)((\nu ))\) such that \(\tilde{\delta }(K_f) - g \in {\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r\). For this element we will have \(\tilde{\delta }(K_f) = K_g\). We write explicitly
Since \(K_f = f \mod ({\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r)\) and \(\frac{\hbox {d}X}{\hbox {d}\nu } = \frac{\hbox {d}\Phi }{\hbox {d}\nu } \mod ({\mathcal J}_l + {\mathcal J}_r)\), it follows that
By Lemma 7.3 and Corollary 8.2,
Using (51) we get that
Therefore, by Corollary 8.2,
Combining (81), (82), and (83), we get
which concludes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 11.2
Given \(\hbox {e}^{- h} G \in {\mathcal O}(U)\) such that G is compactly supported over U, the following identity holds,
Proof
Writing \(\tilde{\delta }= \frac{\hbox {d}}{\hbox {d}\nu } + A\), we see that Theorem 4.1 is equivalent to the fact that
which implies Theorem 11.2 according to Proposition 10.2. \(\square \)
Corollary 11.1
There exists a constant \(c \in \mathbb {C}\) such that
for any \(f \in C_0^\infty (U)((\nu ))\).
Proof
By Theorem 11.1, we have
whence the corollary follows. \(\square \)
Corollary 11.1 implies the following theorem.
Theorem 11.3
If the manifold M is connected, then there exists a constant c such that
for all compactly supported formal functions f on M.
12 Getzler’s rescaling
In this section we use the rescaling of \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) introduced by Getzler in [12]. Consider the operator \(\lambda _s\) on \(C^\infty (TM \oplus \Pi TM)\) given in local coordinates by the formula
Given a function F on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) compactly supported over TM, it is easy to verify that
does not depend on s. An analogous statement holds also for the formal integral when F is an oscillatory symbol.
Proposition 12.1
Given \(\hbox {e}^{- h}G \in {\mathcal O}\) such that \(G \in \hat{P}\) is compactly supported over M, the formal integral
does not depend on s.
Proof
We have
Since only the component of G of bidegree (m, m) with respect to the odd variables \((\theta ,\bar{\theta })\) contributes to the integral, it suffices to prove that
Clearly, \(\det (\Lambda _{s^2h}) = s^{-2m} \det (\Lambda _h)\) and \(\Delta _{s^2 h} = s^{-2}\Delta _h\). Denote by \(G_{k,l}\) the component of G of bidegree (k, l) with respect to the variables \((\eta ,{\bar{\eta }})\). Then,
does not depend on s, whence the proposition follows. \(\square \)
We introduce an operator
and a function
where F(t) is the solution of (55) with the initial condition \(F(0)=\mathbf{{1}}\).
Lemma 12.1
The function G(s, t) is the unique solution of the equation
with the initial condition \(G|_{t=0} = \mathbf{{1}}\) on the space \({\mathcal F}\).
Proof
The lemma follows from the calculation
\(\square \)
Consider the grading on the functions on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) polynomial on fibers given by the operator \({\mathcal E}+ \bar{\mathcal E}\). For the variables \(\eta ,{\bar{\eta }},\theta ,\bar{\theta }\),
(we assume that \(|\nu |=0\)). This grading induces an ascending filtration on the space of formal differential operators on \({\mathcal Q}\). The subspace of filtration degree d consists of the operators of the form \(A = A_d + A_{d-1} + \cdots \), where \(A_j\) is homogeneous of degree j with respect to the this grading. We call this grading the \(\lambda \)-grading, because
It follows from (20) that for \(f \in C^\infty (M)((\nu ))\) the operator \(f - L_f\) has the \(\lambda \)-filtration degree \(-1\). We see from (38) that the \(\lambda \)-filtration degree of the operator \(L_\sigma \) is 2. Denote by \(L_\sigma ^0\) the homogeneous component of \(L_\sigma \) of \(\lambda \)-degree 2. We have
The curvature \(R = R_k^u\) of the Kähler connection on M is given by the formula \(R_k^u = R^u_{kp\bar{q}} \hbox {d}z^p \wedge \hbox {d} \bar{z}^q\), where
In local coordinates the operator \(L_\sigma ^0\) is expressed as follows,
where \(\hat{R}_k^u := R^u_{kp\bar{q}}\theta ^p \bar{\theta }^q\).
The operator \(L_\sigma ^s\) can be written as a series \(L_\sigma ^s = B_0 + s B_1 + \cdots \), where the \(\lambda \)-degree of \(B_i\) is \(2-i\) and \(B_0 = L_\sigma ^0\).
Theorem 12.1
The function G(s, t) is regular at \(s=0\).
Proof
We will prove by induction on i that the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component \(G^i\) of degree i of the function G is regular at \(s=0\). We have \(G^i = \lambda _s^{-1} F^i(s^2 t)\), where \(F^i\) is the \(\deg \)-homogeneous component of degree i of the function F(t). We get from Theorem 9.1 that
This function is regular at \(s=0\) and
Assume that \(G^i\) is regular at \(s=0\) for \(i < l\). In Theorem 9.1 we used the notation \(L_{\nu \sigma } = A^2 + A^3 + \cdots \), where \(\deg A^i = i\). Using that
we can rewrite formula (61) as follows:
Applying \(\lambda _s^{-1}\) to both sides of (86), we get
Replacing t with \(s^2 t\) and using the substitution \(\tau = s^2 u\), we obtain that
Since the \(\lambda \)-filtration degree of the operator \(L_{\nu \sigma }\) is 2, the operator \(s^2\lambda _s^{-1}A^{i+2} \lambda _s\) is regular at \(s=0\). Therefore, by the induction assumption, \(G^l\) is also regular at \(s=0\), whence the theorem follows. \(\square \)
The matrix
is well defined and the elements of the matrix \(H(t) - t \cdot 1\) are even and nilpotent. Theorem 12.1 implies that the function G(0, t) is a solution of the equation
with the initial condition \(G(0,0)=\mathbf{{1}}\). It is easy to prove that this solution is unique. Denote by \(\tilde{h}\) the global function on \(TM \oplus \Pi TM\) given in local coordinates by the formula \(\tilde{h} = -\nu ^{-1}H_k^u(t) g_{u\bar{l}}\eta ^k \bar{\eta }^l\). A direct check shows that
where \(\hat{\omega }\) is given by (34). It follows that
where \(\tilde{G}(t) \in \hat{\mathcal P}\), so that \(G(0,t) \in {\mathcal O}\) for \(t \ne 0\). By (73),
Using Lemma 10.4, we can calculate the following formal oscillatory integral,
Now assume that the manifold M is compact and connected. According to Theorem 10.3 and Proposition 12.1,
for any \(s \ne 0\) and \(t > 0\). Passing to the limit as \(s \rightarrow 0\), we obtain that
for any \(t \ne 0\). We will set \(t = -1\). Theorem 11.3 implies that there exists a constant \(c \in \mathbb {C}\) such that
Since the leading term of the canonical trace density \(\mu _\star \) is given by (3), we see that \(c=1\).
Using the fact that the Todd genus Td(M) of M has a de Rham representative
where R is the curvature of the Kähler connection on M, we obtain the following algebraic Riemann–Roch–Hirzebruch theorem for deformation quantization with separation of variables.
Theorem 12.2
Let \(\star \) be a star product with separation of variables on a compact connected pseudo-Kähler manifold M with classifying form \(\omega \). Then,
where \(\mu _\star \) is the canonical trace density of \(\star \) and \([\omega ]\) is the de Rham class of \(\omega \).
The curvature of the Kähler connection on \(T_{\mathbb {C}}M = T^{(1,0)}M \oplus T^{(0,1)}M \cong T^{(1,0)}M \oplus T^{*(1,0)}M\) is given by the matrix
where we identify \(T^{(0,1)}M\) and \(T^{*(1,0)}M\) via the pseudo-Kähler metric on M. Therefore, the \(\hat{A}\)-genus of M has a de Rham representative
Now the index formula (4) follows from formulas (87) and (9) and the fact that \(\rho = i {{\mathrm{tr}}}R\).
Notes
If \(\alpha = f(z,\bar{z})\hbox {d}z^1 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hbox {d}z^m \wedge \hbox {d} \bar{z}^1 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hbox {d}\bar{z}^m\) is a compactly supported volume form on U, denote by \(\hat{\alpha }= f(z,\bar{z}) \theta ^1 \ldots \theta ^m \bar{\theta }^1 \ldots \bar{\theta }^m\) the corresponding function on \(\Pi TU\). Then,
$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\Pi TU} \hat{\alpha }\, \hbox {d}\beta = \int _U \alpha . \end{aligned}$$
References
Alvarez-Gaumé, L.: Supersymmetry and the Atiah–Singer index theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 161–173 (1983)
Bayen, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, C., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation theory and quantization. I. Deformations of symplectic structures. Ann. Phys. 111(1), 61–110 (1978)
Berline, N., Getzler, E., Vergne, M.: Heat Kernels and Dirac operators. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Bertelson, M., Cahen, M., Gutt, S.: Equivalence of star products. Class. Quan. Gravity 14, A93–A107 (1997)
Bordemann, M., Waldmann, S.: A Fedosov star product of the Wick type for Kähler manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys. 41(3), 243–253 (1997)
Deligne, P.: Déformations de l’Algèbre des Fonctions d’une Variété Symplectique: comparaison entre Fedosov et De Wilde Lecomte. Selecta Math. (New series) 1, 667–697 (1995)
Dolgushev, V.A., Rubtsov, V.N.: An algebraic index theorem for Poisson manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 633, 77–113 (2009)
Fedosov, B.: A simple geometrical construction of deformation quantization. J. Differ. Geom. 40(2), 213–238 (1994)
Fedosov, B.: Deformation Quantization and Index Theory. Mathematical Topics, vol. 9. Akademie, Berlin (1996)
Feigin, B., Felder, G., Shoikhet, B.: Hochschild cohomology of the Weyl algebra and traces in deformation quantization. Duke Math. J. 127, 487–517 (2005)
Feigin, B., Tsygan, B.: Riemann-Roch theorem and Lie algebra cohomology I. In: Proceedings of the Winter School on Geometry and Physics (Srn’i, 1988). Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. 21, pp. 15–52 (1989)
Getzler, E.: Pseudodifferential operators on supermanifolds and the Atiyah–Singer index theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 163–178 (1983)
Gutt, S., Rawnsley, J.: Equivalence of star products on a symplectic manifold. J. Geom. Phys. 29, 347–392 (1999)
Gutt, S., Rawnsley, J.: Natural star products on symplectic manifolds and quantum moment maps. Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 123–139 (2003)
Karabegov, A.: Deformation quantizations with separation of variables on a Kähler manifold. Commun. Math. Phys. 180(3), 745–755 (1996)
Karabegov, A.V.: Cohomological classification of deformation quantizations with separation of variables. Lett. Math. Phys. 43, 347–357 (1998)
Karabegov, A.V.: On the canonical normalization of a trace density of deformation quantization. Lett. Math. Phys. 45, 217–228 (1998)
Karabegov, A.: Formal symplectic groupoid of a deformation quantization. Commun. Math. Phys. 258, 223–256 (2005)
Karabegov, A.: A formal model of Berezin–Toeplitz quantization. Commun. Math. Phys. 274, 659–689 (2007)
Karabegov, A.: Deformation quantization with separation of variables on a super-Kähler manifold. J. Geom. Phys. 114, 197–215 (2017)
Kontsevich, M.: Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157–216 (2003)
Nest, R., Tsygan, B.: Algebraic index theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 172, 223–262 (1995)
Nest, R., Tsygan, B.: Algebraic index theorem for families. Adv. Math. 113, 151–205 (1995)
Pflaum, M.J., Posthuma, H.B., Tang, X.: An algebraic index theorem for orbifolds. Adv. Math. 210, 83–121 (2007)
Pflaum, M.J., Posthuma, H.B., Tang, X.: Cyclic cocycles on deformation quantizations and higher index theorems. Adv. Math. 223, 1958–2021 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to my teacher Alexandre Aleksandrovich Kirillov.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karabegov, A. A heat kernel proof of the index theorem for deformation quantization. Lett Math Phys 107, 2093–2145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-017-0980-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-017-0980-9