Abstract
Context
Interactions between wildlife and anthropogenic infrastructure, such as roads, fences, and dams, can influence wildlife movement, and potentially cause human-wildlife conflict. In the Galapagos archipelago, two species of critically endangered giant tortoise encounter infrastructure and human-modified vegetation in farms, which could influence movement choices.
Objectives
We investigated factors influencing tortoise movement and habitat selection in the agricultural landscape of Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos.
Methods
We examined the movement of 27 tortoises collected using GPS tracking between 2014 and 2020, in relation to the location of vegetation, ponds, fences, and roads.
Results
We found that tortoises preferred pasture over native vegetation, but there was little difference among their preferences for native vegetation, crops, or invasive vegetation. Tortoises also travelled slower in pasture, and faster in invasive vegetation, compared to crops and native vegetation. Tortoises were more likely to be found closer to ponds than predicted by chance. Our results indicated that most fences were porous to tortoises, with limited impact on their movement. Tortoises were more likely to use areas near roads with low-traffic.
Conclusions
Pastures, and ponds are important habitat for tortoises in farms and are likely to be used preferentially by tortoises. Overall, fences and roads did not strongly obstruct tortoise movements, however, this may lead to potential injury to tortoises on roads and property damage for farmers. To best identify priority areas for managing wildlife on farms, we recommend evaluating the combined effects of multiple anthropogenic landscape features on wildlife movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Movement and vegetation data are accessible through Movebank and Remote Sensing, the remaining data will be archived in Dryad.
References
Abrahms B, Jordan NR, Golabek KA et al (2016) Lessons from integrating behaviour and resource selection: activity-specific responses of african wild dogs to roads. Anim Conserv 19:247–255
Alamgir M, Campbell MJ, Sloan S et al (2017) Economic, socio-political and environmental risks of road development in the tropics. Curr Biol 27:R1130–R1140
Bastille-Rousseau G, Murray DL, Schaefer JA et al (2018) Spatial scales of habitat selection decisions: implications for telemetry-based movement modelling. Ecography (Cop) 41:437–443
Bastille-Rousseau G, Potts JR, Yackulic CB et al (2016) Flexible characterization of animal movement pattern using net squared displacement and a latent state model. Mov Ecol 4:15
Bastille-Rousseau G, Yackulic C, Gibbs J et al (2018) Migration triggers in a large herbivore: galapagos giant tortoises navigating resource gradients on volcanoes. Ecology 0:1–11
Beaudry F, deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML (2008) Identifying road mortality threat at multiple spatial scales for semi-aquatic turtles. Biol Conserv 141:2550–2563
Benitez-Capistros F, Camperio G, Hugé J et al (2018) Emergent conservation conflicts in the Galapagos islands: human-giant tortoise interactions in the rural area of Santa Cruz island. PLoS ONE 13:1–28
Benitez-Capistros F, Couenberg P, Nieto A et al (2019) Identifying shared strategies and solutions to the human-giant tortoise interactions in Santa Cruz, Galapagos: a nominal group technique application. Sustainability 11:1–25
Beyer HL, Gurarie E, Börger L et al (2016) “You shall not pass!”: quantifying barrier permeability and proximity avoidance by animals. J Anim Ecol 85:43–53
Bidder OR, Walker JS, Jones MW et al (2015) Step by step: reconstruction of terrestrial animal movement paths by dead-reckoning. Mov Ecol 3:1–17
Blake NJ, Parlin AF, Cumming I et al (2020) Thermoregulation. In: Gibbs JP, Cayot LJ, Tapia WA (eds) Galapagos giant tortoises. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam, pp 175–205
Blake S, Guezou A, Deem S et al (2015) The dominance of Introduced Plant Species in the diets of migratory Galapagos Tortoises increases with elevation on a human-occupied island. Biotropica 47:246–258
Blake S, Tapia PI, Safi K, Ellis-Soto D (2020) Diet, behavior, and activity patterns. In: Gibbs JP, Cayot LJ, Tapia WA (eds) Galapagos giant tortoises. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam, p 286
Blake S, Yackulic C, Wikelski M et al (2015b) Migration by Galapagos Giant Tortoises requires Landscape-Scale Conservation Efforts. 144–150
Blake S, Yackulic CB, Cabrera F et al (2013) Vegetation dynamics drive segregation by body size in Galapagos tortoises migrating across altitudinal gradients. J Anim Ecol 82:310–321
Boarman WI, Sazaki M (2006) A highway’s road-effect zone for desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). J Arid Environ 65:94–101
Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ et al (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9:378–400
Cayot LJ, Gibbs JP, Tapia WH, Caccone A (2017) Chelonoidis porteri The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T9026A82777132
Consejo de Gobierno del Régimen Especial de Galápagos (CGREG) (2015) Censo de Unidades de Producción Agropecuaria de Galápagos 2014 (UPA)– Cons. Gob. del Régimen Espec. Galápagos. Galapagos, Ecuador
Cosgrove AJ, McWhorter TJ, Maron M (2018) Consequences of impediments to animal movements at different scales: a conceptual framework and review. Divers Distrib 24:448–459
Coulon A, Morellet N, Goulard M et al (2008) Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landsc Ecol 23:603–614
Cozzi G, Broekhuis F, Mcnutt JW, Schmid B (2013) Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large african carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity. J Anim Ecol 82:707–715
Eisaguirre JM, Booms TL, Barger CP et al (2020) Novel step selection analyses on energy landscapes reveal how linear features alter migrations of soaring birds. J Anim Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13335
Ellis-Soto D (2021) Giant tortoises connecting terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Galapagos giant tortoises. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 308–309
Epler B (2007) Tourism, the economy. Population Growth, and Conservation in Galapagos
Fieberg J, Signer J, Smith B, Avgar T (2021) A ‘How to’ guide for interpreting parameters in habitat-selection analyses. J Anim Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.12.379834
Forester JD, Im HK, Rathouz PJ (2009) Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. Ecology 90:3554–3565
García-Carrasco JM, Tapia W, Muñoz AR (2020) Roadkill of birds in galapagos islands: a growing need for solutions. Avian Conserv Ecol 15:1–8
Gibbs JP, Hunter EA, Shoemaker KT et al (2014) Demographic outcomes and ecosystem implications of giant tortoise reintroduction to Espanola Island. PLoS ONE, Galapagos. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110742
Gordon IJ (2018) Review: livestock production increasingly influences wildlife across the globe. Animal 2030:1–11
Harris G, Thirgood S, Hopcraft JGC et al (2009) Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger Species Res 7:55–76
Jakes AF, Jones PF, Paige LC et al (2018) A fence runs through it: a call for greater attention to the influence of fences on wildlife and ecosystems. Biol Conserv 227:310–318
Laso FJ (2021) Agriculture, Wildlife, and Conservation in the Galapagos Islands. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Laso FJ, Benítez FL, Rivas-Torres G et al (2020) Land cover classification of complex agroecosystems in the non-protected highlands of the Galapagos Islands. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12010065
Laurance WF, Peletier-Jellema A, Geenen B et al (2015) Reducing the global environmental impacts of rapid infrastructure expansion. Curr Biol 25:R259–R262
LeB Hooke R, Martin-Duque JF, Pedraza J (2012) Land transformation by humans: a review. Geol Soc Am. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAT151A.1.Figure
Lee ATK, Macray MB, Ryan PG, Alexander GJ (2021) Tortoise mortality along fence lines in the Karoo region of South Africa. J Nat Conserv 59:125945
Loarie SR, Aarde RJV, Pimm SL (2009) Fences and artificial water affect african savannah elephant movement patterns. Biol Conserv 142:3086–3098
MacFarland CG, Villa J, Toro B (1974) The Galapagos giant tortoises (Geochelone elephantopus) Part II: conservation methods. Biol Conserv 6:198–212
Michelot T, Blackwell PG, Matthiopoulos J (2019) Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals. Ecology 100:1–22
Muff S, Signer J, Fieberg J (2020) Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using bayesian or frequentist computation. J Anim Ecol 89:80–92
Munger JC, Barnett BR, Novak SJ and Ames AA (2003) Impacts of off-highway motorized vehicles on the reptile and vegetation of the Owyhee Front. Idaho Bur L Manag Tech Bull No.03–3:27
Munger JC, Ames AA (2001) Impacts of off-highway motorized vehicles on sensitive reptile species in Owyhee county, Idaho. Idaho Bur L Manag Tech Bull No. 01–6:32
Nafus MG, Tuberville TD, Buhlmann KA, Todd BD (2013) Relative abundance and demographic structure of Agassiz’s desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) along roads of varying size and traffic volume. Biol Conserv 162:100–106
Oliveira-Santos LGR, Forester JD, Piovezan U et al (2016) Incorporating animal spatial memory in step selection functions. J Anim Ecol 85:516–524
Olsson MPO, Widen P (2008) Effects of highway fencing and wildlife crossings on moose Alces alces movements and space use in southwestern Sweden. Wildlife Biol 14:111–117
Patterson TA, Basson M, Bravington MV, Gunn JS (2009) Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models. J Anim Ecol 78:1113–1123
Peaden JM, Nowakowski AJ, Tuberville TD et al (2017) Effects of roads and roadside fencing on movements, space use, and carapace temperatures of a threatened tortoise. Biol Conserv 214:13–22
Pike K, Blake S, Cabrera F et al (2021) Body size, sex and high philopatry influence the use of agricultural land by Galapagos giant tortoises. Oryx. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320001167
Pike KN, Blake S, Gordon IJ et al (2022) Sharing land with giants: habitat preferences of Galapagos tortoises on farms. Glob Ecol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02171
Poulakakis N, Edwards DL, Chiari Y et al (2015) Description of a New Galapagos giant tortoise species (Chelonoidis; Testudines: Testudinidae) from Cerro Fatal on Santa Cruz Island. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138779
Prokopenko CM, Boyce MS, Avgar T (2017) Characterizing wildlife behavioural responses to roads using integrated step selection analysis. J Appl Ecol 54:470–479
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Reinking AK, Smith KT, Mong TW et al (2019) Across scales, pronghorn select sagebrush, avoid fences, and show negative responses to anthropogenic features in winter. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2722
Riggio J, Baillie JEM, Brumby S et al (2020) Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 26:4344–4356
Rivas-Torres GF, Benítez FL, Rueda D et al (2018) A methodology for mapping native and invasive vegetation coverage in archipelagos: an example from the Galápagos Islands. Prog Phys Geogr 42:83–111
Russell JC, Kueffer C (2019) Island Biodiversity in the Anthropocene–Annu Rev Environ Resour 44:31–60
Rytwinski T, Fahrig L (2013) Why are some animal populations unaffected or positively affected by roads? Oecologia 173:1143–1156
Sampedro C, Pizzitutti F, Quiroga D et al (2018) Food supply system dynamics in the Galapagos Islands: Agriculture, livestock and imports. Renew Agric Food Syst. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170518000534
Seidler RG, Long RA, Berger J et al (2015) Identifying impediments to long-distance mammal migrations. Conserv Biol 29:99–109
Shaw AK (2016) Drivers of animal migration and implications in changing environments. Evol Ecol 30:991–1007
Shepard DB, Kuhns AR, Dreslik MJ, Phillips CA (2008) Roads as barriers to animal movement in fragmented landscapes. Anim Conserv 11:288–296
Shilling F, Collinson W, Bil M et al (2020) Designing wildlife-vehicle conflict observation systems to inform ecology and transportation studies. Biol Conserv 251:108797
Signer J, Fieberg J, Avgar T (2019) Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecol Evol 9:880–890
Smit IPJ, Grant CC, Devereux BJ (2007) Do artificial waterholes influence the way herbivores use the landscape? Herbivore distribution patterns around rivers and artificial surface water sources in a large african savanna park. Biol Conserv 136:85–99
Songhurst A, McCulloch G, Coulson T (2016) Finding pathways to human-elephant coexistence: a risky business. Oryx 50:713–720
St. Clair CC, Backs J, Friesen A, et al (2019) Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife-train collisions. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0050
Tanner D, Perry J (2007) Road effects on abundance and fitness of Galápagos lava lizards (Microlophus albemarlensis). J Environ Manage 85:270–278
Theobald DM, Kennedy C, Chen B et al (2020) Earth transformed: detailed mapping of global human modification from 1990 to 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 12:1953–1972
Thurfjell H, Ciuti S, Boyce MS (2014) Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation. Mov Ecol 2:1–12
Trueman, M., Hobbs, R.J., & Van Niel, K. (2013). Interdisciplinary historical vegetation mapping for ecological restoration in Galapagos– Landsc. Ecol. 28: 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9854-4
van der Grift EA, van der Ree R, Fahrig L et al (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodivers Conserv 22:425–448
Wadey J, Beyer HL, Saaban S et al (2018) Why did the elephant cross the road? The complex response of wild elephants to a major road in Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv 218:91–98
Watson J, Trueman M, Tufet M, Henderson S, Atkinson R (2010) Mapping terrestrial anthropogenic degradation on the inhabited islands of the Galapagos Archipelago. Oryx 44:79
Wiggins IL, Porter DM (1971) Flora of the Galapagos Islands. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Wilcove DS, Wikelski M (2008) Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing? PLoS Biol 6:1361–1364
Yackulic CB, Blake S, Bastille-Rousseau G (2017) Benefits of the destinations, not costs of the journeys, shape partial migration patterns. J Anim Ecol 86:972–982
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Cushman SA et al (2016) Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: pumas as a case study. Landsc Ecol 31:1319–1335
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Winifred Violet Scott Charitable Trust and a Prestige Research Training Program awarded to KP and a United States National Science Foundation. (DEB 1258062) grant awarded to SB. We thank the Galapagos National Park Directorate, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Charles Darwin Foundation, Galapagos Science Center, Max Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, Saint Louis Zoo Institute for Conservation Medicine, e-obs GmbH, National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, National Geographic Society Global Exploration Fund, Galapagos Conservation Trust, Zurich Zoo, Houston Zoo, Swiss Friends of Galapagos, The Woodspring Trust, British Chelonian Group for their support. We thank the numerous Galapagos landowners who allowed field teams to access their private lands. We also extend thanks to Dr. Sharon Deem, Dr. Ainoa Nieto Claudın, Jose Harro, Diego Ellis-Soto, Dr. Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau, and the Gomez Ramon family for their help and discussions. This publication is contribution number 2456 of the Charles Darwin Foundation, under the Galapagos National Park permit PC-16-19 & PC-35-18.
Funding
This research was funded by the Winifred Violet Scott Charitable Trust, and a Prestige Research Training Program awarded to KP and a United States National Science Foundation (DEB 1258062) grant awarded to SB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KP, LS, IG and SB conceived the ideas and designed methodology; FC collected the movement data and KP the fence structure data; FL categorized the road network data. FL and GRT produced the land cover data. KP analysed the data; KP led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competitng interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pike, K.N., Blake, S., Gordon, I.J. et al. Navigating agricultural landscapes: responses of critically endangered giant tortoises to farmland vegetation and infrastructure. Landsc Ecol 38, 501–516 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01566-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01566-x