Abstract
To investigate the activity concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides such as 238U, 232Th, and 40K, as well as the presence of radon (222Rn) and thoron (220Rn) in the vicinity of the Aravalli Mountain range in Mahendergarh, India, a comprehensive study was conducted. We meticulously examined soil samples obtained from both field and hill areas using NaI (Tl) detector based on gamma spectroscopy. It is noteworthy that concentrations were found lower than the global average values. Notably, the hill soil samples exhibited a higher activity concentration in comparison to the field soil samples. Overall, in terms of radium equivalent activity (226Ra), gamma absorbed dose rate, and the internal hazard index, our findings did not reveal any significant radiological risks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil is the principal reservoir for all essential life supporting components either directly or indirectly. It contributes significantly to the natural background radiation and these radiations exposed to the surroundings [1, 2]. Soil constitutes the uppermost layer of the earth crust, formed through a series of physiochemical changes including decomposition, water movement, and weathering of solid rock. Within the earth crust, rocks and minerals naturally emit low levels of radiation due to the presence of radioactive isotopes. Soil comprises minerals and rocks that naturally erode, releasing radioactive elements, particularly uranium (238U), thorium (232Th), and potassium (40K), along with their decay products, as inherent components of soil. Radiation is an integral aspect of our environment, and human exposure and radiation occurs through routine interactions, such as exposure to sunlight and natural background radiation [3].
Background radiation encompasses cosmic radiation that constantly permeates the atmosphere from space. The average annual natural background radiation exposure for humans is approximately 1.1 mSv, sourced from cosmic radiation (0.35 mSv) and from atmospheric sources its value is 0.05 mSv [4]. The distribution of radionuclides in soil and their radiological impacts significantly influence human health. These radionuclides account for at least 80% of natural radiation exposure [5, 6], with the remaining 20% stemming from human activities. Elevated levels of anthropogenic radiation, originating from 238U and its decay products in geological materials as well as 232Th, predominantly found in zircons, igneous rocks, and monazite sands are significant contributors to high background radiation levels. In some regions, the presence of monazite sands has resulted in exceptionally high background radiation levels, increasing radiation exposure in various countries [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Pegmatite, granite, diorite, and gneiss rock samples of North Pakistan were highly radioactive and should not be used as constructing material [16]. Globally, naturally the high background radiation place is Ramsar City, Iran. In Iran, high background radiation is due to the presence of 226Ra in local rocks [17]. Mrima Hill of Kenya country, known for high background radiation due to the presence of heavy minerals like carbonatites, and monazites. Here, activity concentration of naturally occurring radioactive elements and dose rate were found above the global value [18]. Also, in India, Kerala has a high level of radiation, and the attribution of radiation is due to monazite sand containing enriched thorium [8]. Prior research has shown that higher levels of radon and thoron in the environment significantly increase the risk of lung cancer even in non smokers [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Radon (222Rn) and thoron (220Rn) are released from soil and construction materials into the environment through emanation and exhalation. The exhalation rate is influenced by various factors, including the content of 226Ra in the soil, rock composition, porosity, permeability, temperature, humidity, and meteorological conditions [25,26,27,28]. Thus, this study project also included the measurement of the exhalation rate for soil samples to assess potential health risks.
Although radionuclide levels in soil have been measured in various regions of Haryana over the past few decades [28,29,30,31,32]. No prior investigations have been reported on these radioactive elements in the soils of the Mahendergarh district in Haryana. Given the common association of 238U and 232Th with the Aravalli Hills, radiation exposure from this region could be an environmental concern. Consequently, it is essential to conduct a qualitative analysis of these radionuclides in this specific research area. Buildings in India commonly utilize bricks that incorporate approximately 80% soil [20]. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether the soil in this area is suitable for construction without posing risks to human health.
Radionuclide 226Ra is known to migrate more readily in the environment and its decay product, radon gas escapes from the soil. While various natural radionuclides such as those in the 235U series, 176Lu, 87Rb, and 147Sm exist in the environment at low levels and their contributions to human radiation exposure are relatively low [33]. As a result, this study focuses on the assessment of radionuclides 238U, 232Th, and primordial radionuclide 40K in the soil, utilizing a gamma ray spectrometer to measure element activity concentrations and calculate the exhalation rates of 222Rn and 220Rn for the soil samples by employing the SMART RnDuo portable radon monitor.
Geological characteristics of the study area
The research was conducted in the vicinity of the Aravalli Mountain range located in Mahendergarh, Haryana, India. This district spans between 24° 47′ to 28° 26′ N latitudes and 75° 56′ to 76° 51′ E longitudes, covering an area of 1899 km2. The region primarily falls within the Indo Gangetic plains geomorphological zone.
The predominant soil types in this district include arid soil, blown sand, and alluvium. These soils typically contain subsurface lime nodules and exhibit calcareous characteristics. The geological substrata of the district consist of rocks belonging to the Delhi and Delhi systems, overlain by recent alluvial deposits and blown sand.
The area surrounding the district features prominent hill formations, notably the Madhogarh Hill, Dhosi Hill, and the Tosham Hill range. These hills are situated within the Aravalli Mountain range and primarily consist of metasedimentary rocks [34]. These metasedimentary rocks predominantly comprise quartzite and contain a relatively low number of pegmatites, slate granite, and phyllite. The Tosham Hill range, an essential component of the Aravalli Mountain range, falls under the Archean Bilwala basement rock category and primarily comprises quartz and granite porphyries known for their high thermal conductivity.
Climatically, the study area experiences an annual average rainfall of approximately 500 mm, with uneven distribution across the region. Moreover, the district is situated near the Dohan River, which is currently facing the threat of extinction. The Krishnavati River originates from the Aravalli range, near the Dariba copper mine in the state of Rajasthan.
Experimental procedure
Sample preparation
In this research, a total of 28 soil samples were initially chosen randomly from various surface areas, including rock formations within the Aravalli range, for the determination of radionuclides. Subsequently, 17 of these soil samples were selected for the measurement of radon and thoron exhalation rates in Mahendergarh, Haryana, India, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Each sample was obtained at a depth of 45 cm and was accurately positioned using GPS coordinates.
The collected samples, each weighing approximately 1 kg, underwent a series of processing steps, including grinding, sieving, and homogenization, resulting in a particle size of 100 mesh, achieved through the use of a crushing machine. Following this, the prepared samples were dried at 110 °C for 12 h to ensure the complete removal of moisture. After the samples were weighed, they were placed into sun pet jars, hermetically sealed, and left undisturbed for over one month. This critical step allowed for the establishment of secular equilibrium, as described in previous studies [35, 36]. By doing so, it ensured that radon gas was contained within the samples, and its decay products remained within the samples for subsequent measurements and analysis.
Instrumentation and calibration
For the determination of the concentration of natural radionuclides, a γ-ray spectrometer employing NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with dimensions of 2″ × 2″ was utilized. The detector (MODEL: NETS – ØM) was supplied by electronic enterprises (I) PVT. Ltd PARA Electronics-Mfg. Division Mulund Mumbai. The detector boasts a resolution of (FWHM) 1.85 keV for the 1.33 MeV gamma line of 60Co [37]. Energy calibration was performed using point sources of 60Co and 137Cs.
Measurement of radioactivity concentration
The measurement of radioactivity concentration involved the use of γ- rays emitted by specific radioactive isotopes for analysis. Notably, the γ-rays of interest included 186.2 keV for 238U, 911 keV, 968 keV for 232Th, and 1460.8 keV for 40K [38]. The counting period for each sample was set at 80,000 s to ensure robust statistical data. Subsequent analysis of the obtained counts facilitated the calculation of the activity concentration of radioactive elements, specifically 238U, 232Th, and 40K reported in Bq/kg.
Theoretical calculations
Given the non-uniform distribution of natural radionuclides (238U, 232Th, and 40K) within the soil, an assessment of radiological risks associated with soil usage was performed using a single index incorporating the activity of various radionuclides. The activity concentrations of uranium, potassium, and thorium were calculated employing the following Eq. (1) [39, 40].
Radium (Raeq) equivalent activity is used to compute the total radiation exposure caused by radionuclides (238U, 232Th, and 40K). The calculation is performed by using the following Eq. (2) [38, 41, 42].
where AU, ATh, and AK are the concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K in Bq kg−1 respectively [7].
Hazard index
Internal hazard index (Hin) measures the effect of radionuclides on the lungs and other organs. Its value must be less than unity. Using the following Eq. (3), one can determine the risks due to naturally occurring radionuclides [42].
The constant terms are used, it is assumed that the radiation doses for 238U, 232Th, and 40K were 185 Bq kg–1, 259 Bq kg–1, and 4810 Bq kg–1 to provide equal gamma radiation dose [43, 44].
Absorbed dose rate (AAD)
It can be calculated by using the following Eq. (4) [7] using activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K (UNSCEAR 2000).
where AU, ATh, and AK are the radioactivity concentrations of natural radionuclides in soil samples [45].
Radon exhalation rate measurement
To determine the exhalation rate of 222Rn in soil samples, a Portable Radon Monitor developed by BARC (Bhabha Atomic Research Centre) was employed, as depicted in Fig. 2. This monitor operates by detecting alpha particles produced by 222Rn and its progenies, namely 218Pb and 214Po.
The procedure involved placing the soil sample within a stainless steel cylindrical container with a known weight (M). The container measured 8.2 cm in height and had an inner diameter of 10 cm. A progeny filter was utilized to selectively collect radon while effectively eliminating the 222Rn descendants. In addition, a pinhole plate was employed to suppress thoron, which is relatively short lived. This step was essential to account for the diffusion time delay, a phenomenon in which the transmission of 220Rn takes longer compared to radon transmission due to the shorter lifetime of thoron. Each measurement was carried out for 9 h to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the accuracy and precision of the experimental setup, a quality control measure verified by the creator of the SMART RnDuo [46].
The radon mass exhalation (Jm) rate is calculated by analysing the radon concentration C(t), and applying Eq. (5) [46,47,48,49,50].
where Jm is the radon mass exhalation rate in mBq/kg/h, V (m3) is the sum of the effective chamber volume and the volume of the scintillation cell, M (kg) is the sample mass, λe(h–1) is the effective decay constant due to decomposition of 222Rn, back diffusion, leakage rate of chamber, C0 is the initial radon concentration in the chamber at time t = 0.
Measurement of thoron surface exhalation rate
To assess the concentration of 220Th, a flow mode sampler was connected to the inlet of the monitor pump as shown in Fig. 3. This sampler was exclusively used for the quantification of thoron. The quantification process involved a 15 min cycle during which measurements of thoron levels and background counts were recorded. Following this cycle, a 5 min hold up period was observed to ensure that the 220Th had nearly completely decayed. Subsequently, a final 5 min count was conducted to determine the number of background counts associated with that specific cycle.
The surface rate (Jst) of thoron in Bq/m2/s was calculated using Eq. (6), as previously employed and validated in related studies [51,52,53].
where Ct is the build up 220Rn concentration (Bq/m3) within the chamber as determined by a portable monitor throughout 15 min cycle. V (m3) is the leftover air volume enclosed by the loop. A (m2) is the sample surface area. λ is the decay constant of 220Rn (0.012464 s–1).
Results and discussion
Naturally occurring radionuclides
Using NaI (Tl) detector, the radioactivity concentration in the study area was determined. The activity concentration of 238U, 232Th, and 40K varied within the range of (0.06–1.81) Bq/kg, (0.09–2.37) Bq/kg, and (3.09–10.9) Bq/kg with mean values of 0.84 Bq/kg, 1.16 Bq/kg, and 7.08 Bq/kg, respectively. It is noteworthy that these activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, 40K, and 226Raeq radionuclides are below the permissible limits of the world average values of 32 Bq/kg, 30 Bq/kg, 400 Bq/kg, and 370 Bq/kg, as outlined by UNSCEAR in 2000.
The coefficient of variability was highest for 238U (49%) and lowest for 40K (23%). Notably, the highest concentrations of uranium, thorium, and potassium were found in Jhhankhadi village, Narnaul Singhana bottom hill, and Narnaul Dhosi hill, while the maximum radium equivalent activity concentration was observed in Narnaul Singhana bottom hill.
Analysis of Fig. 4 reveals that the activity concentration of 40K in all soil samples was greater than that of 238U and 232Th, which is consistent with soil expectations. This variation may be attributed to geological disparities, the application of chemical fertilizers for agricultural purposes, and the presence of the Aravalli Hills, all contributing to the increased radioactivity in the study area.
Furthermore, as illustrated in Fig. 4 the activity concentration of 232Th surpasses that of 238U in all soil samples, except for seven locations. This finding suggests the prevalence of thorium rich soil in the study area, corroborating the notion that thorium is more abundant in nature than uranium, in alignment with the World Nuclear Association Report in 2020 on thorium. The contribution of radionuclides to the absorbed dose rate in air depends on their concentration in the soil, with absorbed dose rates varying from 0.46 to 2.28 nGy/h, averaging 1.38 nGy/h. In comparison to the world average absorbed dose rate of 86 nGy/h (UNSCEAR, 2000), the calculated values in the soil samples are significantly lower, underscoring the region safety in terms of radiation exposure. Additionally, the calculated average value of the internal hazard index (Hin) was determined to be 0.01, indicating values lower than the safe threshold.
Radon and Thoron exhalation rate
The mean values of 222Rn mass and 220Rn surface exhalation rate were found to be 51.9 and 17.4 Bq/m2/h, respectively as reported in Table 1. The mean value of radon mass exhalation rate is approximately 9% lower than the world average value of 57 mBq/kg/h, while the mean value of thoron surface exhalation rate is nearly 99.5% lower than the world average value of 3600 Bq/m2/h, as reported by UNSCEAR in 2000.
In the bar graph presented in Fig. 5 and Table 1, it is evident that the maximum thoron exhalation rate was recorded for Madhogarh Mid Hill (location no. 5), measuring 34.8 Bq/m2/h, while the maximum mass exhalation rate of 240 mBq/kg/h was also found in Madhogarh Mid Hill. The figure illustrates high peaks representing rock samples and lower peaks representing field area samples. Specifically, the samples with sample numbers 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 correspond to hill soil samples, exhibiting higher radon mass and thoron surface exhalation rates compared to the rest of the samples, which are field soil samples.
Correlation between radionuclides present in soil samples
Figure 6 illustrates the correlation between 238U and 222Rn, which is weak but positive, with an R2 value of 0.0044. As demonstrated in Fig. 7, thorium exhibits a weak yet positive correlation (0.0299) with thoron. It is important to note that no strong statistical relationship exists between these radionuclides, indicating that the radioactive content in soil samples is influenced by the diverse nature of these radionuclides. Therefore, the distribution of one radionuclide in the soil does not depend on the concentration of another radioactive element.
To further contextualize the results, the study area was compared with hilly areas in India, particularly those surrounded by the Aravalli hills, as shown in Table 2. The findings revealed that the radon exhalation rate in the study area was similar to that of Granitic hills in Karnataka [54]. However, the values for radon exhalation rate were lower in comparison to Kamaun Hills in Uttarakhand [55], sub-mountainous regions in Jammu & Kashmir [56], Shivalik Hills in Himalaya [57], the Himalaya foothill region in Uttarakhand [7] and Shivalik Hills in Haryana and Himachal Pradesh [58].
Differentiation of natural radioactivity in rock soil samples
The natural hills in the study area, such as Madhogarh, Dhosi, Kaliana, and Singhana Hills are formed through various geological processes. These hills can also result from erosion, where rocks, soil, and sediments accumulate in a particular area. The presence of natural radionuclides and the exhalation of 222Rn and 220Rn were found to be greater in hill soil samples as compared to field samples. The statistical data plotted for gamma absorbed dose rate values and hazard index is presented in Fig. 8. Here, the maximum hazard index and absorbed dose rate were found for Narnaul Singhana Bottom Hill. The distribution of radionuclides in hill soil samples is depicted in Fig. 9, where it can be observed that the activity concentration of 238U was highest for Dhosi Hill, 232Th was most prominent in Narnaul Singhana Hill, 40K concentration was at its peak in Dhosi Hill, and 220Rn and 222Rn were elevated in Madhogarh Mid Hill soil samples. Narnaul Dhosi Hill predominantly consists of quartzite, with some pegmatite, slate, granite gneiss, phyllite, schist, and various basic rocks. The sharp contact between pegmatite and quartzite, along with the blurred contact between granite and pegmatite at Narnaul, serve as strong evidence of geological movement within the Aravalli orogenic belt [59]. The high concentration of heat producing elements in granite indicates the presence of radioactive elements like 238U, 232Th, and 40K. Madhogarh Hill, an isolated hill within the Aravalli range, is believed to release significant amounts of radon and thoron gases due to the presence of basic rocks.
Rocks found in the Kaliana Hills predominantly consist of mica, quartz grains, sedimentary quartzite, and flexible sandstone known as Itacolumite. While both flexible and non flexible sandstone can be found in the Kaliana area, non flexible sandstone is more abundant relative to flexible sandstone. Cementing materials such as floor tiles are produced using these sandstones. Although the concentration of radionuclides was higher in Kaliana Hill as compared to field soil, it remained within safe limits. This suggests that Kaliana soil samples can be utilized for building materials [60]. Narnaul Singhana Hill is part of parametamorphites belonging to the Delhi Subdivision, and it is characterized by schists, amphibole quartzite, and mineralized shear zones. These features may account for the high concentration of thorium in the area. Additionally, inhomogeneity in the distribution of radioactive elements in different geological layers of the hill was observed, with some layers being more radioactive than others. This variation is attributed to temperature differences at different elevations of the hill, with the top elevation having lower temperatures than the midsection. The distribution of radioactive elements is also influenced by the type of rock in a given layer, emphasizing the need for future researchers to conduct radiometric measurements at specific hill locations.
Certain types of hills, such as those with sedimentary rocks like Kaliana Hill, exhibit lower radioactivity concentrations in comparison to hills containing granites and some metamorphic rocks. As demonstrated in Fig. 9, Kaliana Hill did not have the highest radionuclide concentrations, as it primarily consists of sedimentary rocks. According to the literature survey, sedimentary rocks consist of low radioactivity as compared to igneous rocks [61]. Deposition, soil erosion, and topographical variations affect the morphological, chemical, and physical characteristics of the soil [62]. In hilly areas, the radioactivity is high which is interrelated with dental fluorosis [63]. Mahendergarh area is also a fluorosis endemic red zone alert area, here fluoride distribution in groundwater is due to fluoride bearing rocks. Here dental fluorosis was diagnosed, and found high level of fluoride [64]. The present area is an industries free, pollution free area, and inhabitants of this area are dependent on agriculture. So, industrial aerosols are not responsible for high radioactivity in this area. This is the reason that there is no radioactivity was found in the field soil samples. Also, one can say that the geology of this area, and radiation bearing rocks may be responsible for high activity concentration in hills soil samples.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the activity concentration values in the study area are influenced by geographical conditions, soil composition, and the presence of the Aravalli hills. These values were found to be lower than the world average, indicating that the radiation levels in the area are within safe limits. Additionally, the prevalence of higher 232Th concentration over 238U in all samples suggests that the soil in the study region is thorium enriched. The hills with granite and gneiss rocks exhibited the highest radioactivity concentrations, whereas sandstone rocks had lower concentrations. When compared to the world average absorbed dose rate, the calculated values suggest that the study area is safe in terms of radiation levels. As this study is the first of its kind, it holds importance for future researchers in the field of natural radioactivity mapping and radiometric measurements in hilly areas. In summary, the results of this study indicate that the soil in both hill and field areas is suitable for use in construction materials and does not pose any health risks to residents.
References
UNSCEAR (1988) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Report to the General Assembly
Kumar M (2022) Estimation of 222Rn, 220Rn exhalation rate and 226Ra, 232Th, 40K radionuclides in the soil samples of different regions of Gurdaspur district, Punjab. Mater Today Proc 49:3396–3402
Alzubaidi G (2016) Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and radiation hazards in agricultural and virgin soil in the state of Kedah, North of Malaysia. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6178103
Johnson S (1991) Natural radiation. Va Miner 37(2):9–16
International Atomic Energy Agency (1973) Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive materials. 96–00725 IAEA/PI/A47E
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (1993) Exposure from natural sources of radiation, United Nations, New York
Anamika K (2020) Assessment of radiological impacts of natural radionuclides and radon exhalation rate measured in the soil samples of Himalayan foothills of Uttarakhand, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 323:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06876-0
Venunathan N (2016) Natural radioactivity in sediments and river bank soil of Kallada river of Kerala, South India and associated radiological risk. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 171(2):271–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw073
Bennett B (1996) Exposure to natural radiation worldwide. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on high levels of natural radiation: radiation doses and health effects, Beijing, China, pp 15–23
Paschoa A (2000) More than forty years of studies of natural radioactivity in Brazil. Technology 7(2–3):193–212
Kannan V (2002) Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soil and beach sand samples of Kalpakkam (India) using hyper pure germanium (HPGe) gamma ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 57(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00262-7
Ghiassi Nejad M (2002) Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: preliminary biological studies. Health Phys 82(1):87–93
Wei L (2000) An introductory overview of the epidemiological study on the population at the high background radiation areas in Yangjiang, China. J Radiat Res 41(Suppl):S1–S7. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.41.S1
Sunta C (1993) A review of the studies of high background areas of the SW coast of India. In: Proceedings of the international conference on high levels of natural radiation, Ramsar, IAEA, pp 71–86
Radhakrishna A (1993) A new natural background radiation area on the southwest coast of India. Health Phys 65(4):390–395
Younis H (2022) Gamma radioactivity and environmental radiation risks of granitoids in central and western Gilgit Baltistan, Himalayas, North Pakistan. Res Phys 37:105509
Karam P (2001) The very high background radiation area in Ramsar, Iran: Public health risk or signal for a regulatory paradigm shift. pp 495–502
Kebwaro J (2011) Radiometric assessment of natural radioactivity levels around Mrima Hill, Kenya. 6(13): 3105–3110. http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS
UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations scientific committee of the effect of atomic radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiations. United Nations, New York
Bangotra P (2016) Study of natural radioactivity (226Ra, 232Th and 40K) in soil samples for the assessment of average effective dose and radiation hazards. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 171(2):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw074
Krewski D (2006) A combined analysis of North American case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer. J Toxicol Environ Health A 69(7–8):533–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390500260945
Darby S (2005) Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case control studies. BMJ 330(7485):223. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63
Das B (2000) Cancer pattern in Haryana: twenty-one years experience. Health Adm 17(1):29
Chahal K (2022) Estimation of surface exhalation rate of thoron (220 Rn) in soil samples of Aravalli Mountain range region of district Mahendergarh, Haryana, India using alpha detector Smart Rnduo. In: Proceedings of the DAE-BRNS symposium on Nuclear Physics V, pp 66
Nazaroff W (1992) Radon transport from soil to air. Rev Geophys 30(2):137–160. https://doi.org/10.1029/92RG00055
Sahu P (2013) Radon emanation from low-grade uranium ore. J Environ Radioact 126:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.014
Kumar A (2014) Modeling of indoor radon concentration from radon exhalation rates of building materials and validation through measurements. J Environ Radioact 127:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.10.004
Devi V (2019) A study on radionuclides content and radon exhalation from soil of Northern India. Environ Earth Sci 78:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8512-9
Chauhan R (2016) Ventilation effect on indoor radon–thoron levels in dwellings and correlation with soil exhalation rates. Indoor Built Environ 25(1):203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14542887
Chauhan R (2011) Radon exhalation rates from stone and soil samples of Aravali hills in India. 9(1): 57–61
Mann N (2015) Radon-thoron measurements in air and soil from some districts of northern part of India. Nucl Technol Radiat Protect 30(4):294–300
Singh P (2016) Theoretical modeling of indoor radon concentration and its validation through measurements in South-East Haryana, India. J Environ Manag 171:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.003
Al-Shboul K (2023) Unraveling the complex interplay between soil characteristics and radon surface exhalation rates through machine learning models and multivariate analysis. Environ Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122440
Kanyan N (2020) Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Narnaul Pegmatites in Delhi Supergroup rocks, Narnaul area, southern Haryana, India. J Nepal Geol Soc 60:87–102. https://doi.org/10.3126/jngs.v60i0.31268
Ibrahiem N (1993) Measurement of radioactivity levels in soil in the Nile Delta and Middle Egypt. Health Phys 64(6):620–627
Saleh M (2014) Assessment of radiological health implicat from ambient environment in the Muar district, Johor, Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem 103:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.05.054
Melissinos A (2003) Experiments in modern physics. Gulf Professional Publishing
Durusoy A (2017) Determination of radioactivity concentrations in soil samples and dose assessment for Rize Province, Turkey. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 10(4):348–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2017.09.005
Singh B (2021) Monitoring of natural radionuclides by alpha scintillometry and gamma spectrometry techniques in soil of district Palwal, Southern Haryana, India. Int J Environ Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.2016726
Mann N (2018) Measurement of radium, thorium, potassium and associated hazard indices from the soil samples collected from Northern India. Indoor Built Environ 27(8):1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17696136
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2000 Report, Volume I: Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes-Sources. United Nations
Beretka J (1985) Natural radioactivity of building materials, industrial wastes and byproducts. Health Phys 48:87–95
Guidebook A (1989) Measurement of radionuclides in food and the environment. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Joel E (2019) Investigation of natural environmental radioactivity concentration in soil of coastaline area of Ado Odo/Ota Nigeria and its radiological implications. Sci Rep 9(1):4219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40884-0
Saito K (1995) Gamma ray fields in the air due to sources in the ground. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 58(1):29–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082594
Gaware J (2011) Development of online radon and thoron monitoring systems for occupational and general environments. In the Forthcoming issue
Sahoo B (2007) Estimation of radon emanation factor in Indian building materials. Radiat Meas 42(8):1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.04.002
Vaupotič J (1992) Alpha scintillation cell for direct measurement of indoor radon. J Environ Sci Health Part A 27(6):1535–1540
Porstendörfer J (1994) Properties and behaviour of radon and thoron and their decay products in the air. J Aerosol Sci 25(2):219–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90077-9
De Martino S (1998) Radon emanation and exhalation rates from soils measured with an electrostatic collector. Appl Radiat Isot 49(4):407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00300-4
Kanse S (2013) Powder sandwich technique: a novel method for determining the thoron emanation potential of powders bearing high 224Ra content. Radiat Meas 48:82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.10.014
Sahoo B (2014) Thoron interference in radon exhalation rate measured by solid state nuclear track detector based can technique. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 302:1417–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3580-5
Tuccimei P (2006) Simultaneous determination of 222Rn and 220Rn exhalation rates from building materials used in Central Italy with accumulation chambers and a continuous solid state alpha detector: influence of particle size, humidity and precursors concentration. Appl Radiat Isot 64(2):254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.07.016
Poojitha C (2020) Assessment of radon and thoron exhalation from soils and dissolved radon in ground water in the vicinity of elevated granitic hill, Chikkaballapur district, Karnataka, India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 190(2):185–192
Semwal P (2018) Measurement of 222 Rn and 220 Rn exhalation rate from soil samples of Kumaun Hills, India. Acta Geophys 66(5):1203–1211
Kaur M (2021) Measurement of radionuclide contents and 222 Rn/220 Rn exhalation rate in soil samples from the sub-mountainous region of India. Arab J Geosci 14(9):1–16
Kaur M (2018) Study of radon/thoron exhalation rate, soil-gas radon concentration, and assessment of indoor radon/thoron concentration in Siwalik Himalayas of Jammu & Kashmir. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24(8):2275–2287
Chauhan R (2014) Estimation of dose contribution from 226Ra, 232Th and 40K radon exhalation rates in soil samples from Shivalik foot hills in India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 158(1):79–86
Babu P (1993) Tin and Rare Metal Pegmatites of the Bastar-Koraput Pegmatite Belt, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, India. Characterisation and Classification. Geol Soc India 42(2):180–190
Kumar P (2019) Itacolumite (Flexible sandstone) from Kaliana, Charkhi Dadri District, Haryana, India. J Geol Soc India 93:278–284
Dina NT (2022) Natural radioactivity and its radiological implications from soils and rocks in Jaintiapur area, North-east Bangladesh. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331(11):4457–4468
Akhtaruzzaman M (2014) Morphological, physical and chemical characteristics of hill forest soils at Chittagong University, Bangladesh. Open J Soil Sci 4:26–35. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2014.41004
Chowdhury CR (2020) Radionuclide activity concentration in soil, granites and water in a fluorosis endemic area of India: an oral health perspective. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res 10(3):259–262
Yadav S (2019) Fluoride distribution in underground water of district Mahendergarh, Haryana, India. Appl Water Sci 9:1–11
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the inhabitants of the studied area for their cooperation during the fieldwork and thankful to the Guru Jambheswar University of Science and Technology, Hisar for providing experimental facilities and support. One of the authors Kavita Chahal thankful to Central University of Haryana for providing a Research fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known conflicting financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the findings represented in this paper. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in the publication of the paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chahal, K., Kumar, S., Budhwar, S. et al. An assessment of radionuclides level, radon and thoron exhalation rate in hill and field soil of Mahendergarh district in Haryana, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 333, 2649–2659 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09494-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09494-7