Abstract
Soil microplastic (MP) contamination through plastic mulch and greenhouse soils is a global concern. However, whether plastic mulch contaminates the soil to a greater or lesser extent than the contamination caused by building greenhouses with MPs has not been documented. This study is the first to examine and compare the abundance and distribution of MPs in greenhouses and mulched soils of Korean agriculture field to obtain the polymer types and sizes of MPs present. The MP abundances in the greenhouse and mulched soils ranged from 50 to 379 and 158 to 943 particles kg− 1, respectively, with an average abundance of 221.4 and 356.8 particles kg− 1. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in soil MP contamination between the greenhouse and mulching sites. At both sites, fragments (91%) were the predominant MP shape. MPs with a size < 300 μm were dominant, covering 99.57% of the mulch site and 99.69% of the greenhouse. Six MP polymers in the greenhouse and mulching sites: polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene amide, and polymethyl methacrylate were identified. The soil MP contaminants in greenhouses and mulch sites in the Haean Basin have originated from the use of plastic films, and ropes. The first-hand data established by this study showed the same degree of MP contamination in mulch and greenhouse soils, which provides important background information on MP characteristics to understand the environmental behavior and ecological effects of MPs in soil systematically and comprehensively.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since the Industrial Revolution that originated in Britain, the Earth has faced a series of challenges, such as global population explosion and overexploitation of soil [1,2,3,4,5]. Many people across the globe rely heavily on soil to produce food for their livelihoods [6,7,8]. Several studies have documented that over-exploitation of soils can lead to a shortage of arable land and a decline in soil fertility and moisture in the long run [9,10,11]. For instance, Nawaz et al. [12] reported that the continuously growing population of South Asia exerts a considerable amount of pressure on soils and degrades their fertility. To deal with the challenges arising from an excessive dependence on soils for agriculture, to feed the huge global population, tremendous efforts have been made to find alternatives that can help reduce the existing pressure on soils. In the search for a solution, the global scientific community has invented many technologies and materials to address this pressing concern.
In 1862, Alexander Parkes invented the first artificial plastic made from organic compounds to replace ivory and horn [13, 14]. In 1907, Dr. Leo Bakeland created plastic from an inorganic compound called cellulose [15, 16]. Since the invention of plastics, many technologies have been developed to help increase and/or enhance crop yields to feed the current large global population [17]. One such technology is the greenhouse. However, the long-term use of greenhouses built using plastic films may lead to soil microplastic (MP) contamination (< 5 mm). For example, Wang et al. [18] documented MP concentrations of approximately 2215.56 ± 1549.86 particles kg− 1 in soils from an abandoned greenhouse and associated the high MP concentration with the high-intensity activity in the greenhouses used for crops that pollutes soils with MPs. In addition, Kim et al. [19] reported an average MP concentration of approximately 1880 ± 1563 particles kg− 1 in soils from greenhouses in Korea. In Korea, greenhouses are often replaced after being used for three years or more [19].
Another technology that serves as a solution to ease soil degradation and help increase annual crop yields is plastic mulching. According to Wang et al., [20] plastic mulching is beneficial for increasing soil nutrient cycling and enzyme activity, and reducing soil moisture lost by evaporation. In Korea, plastic mulching is widely used to control weeds and grow crops such as ginseng, apples, and tomatoes, especially in cooler regions such as the Haean Basin, to increase crop yields; however plastic films are expected to be removed by law once crops are ready to be harvested [22]. Although plastic mulch is very useful in modern crop cultivation, many studies have reported that the long-term use of plastic mulch can contaminate soils with low MP concentrations. In addition, Haixin et al. [23] reported soil MP contamination concentrations as low as 384.6 particles kg− 1 in plastic mulching farmland. In addition, Huang et al. [17] recorded a low MP concentration of approximately 1075.6 particles kg− 1 in the soil after plastic mulching in cotton fields compared to the MP concentration reported at most greenhouse sites.
In contrast, some studies have reported MP concentrations in plastic mulching sites that are similar in magnitude to those reported in greenhouse sites. For example, Zhang et al. [24] documented MP concentrations of approximately 2840 particles kg− 1 following tobacco cultivation with plastic mulching, which is nearly equal in magnitude to the MP concentrations in greenhouses. Meanwhile, several other studies have reported larger magnitudes of MP concentrations in plastic mulching soils compared to any of the magnitude of MPs reported in any studies to date. For example, Xu et al. [25] reported higher MP concentrations of 7183–10,586 particles kg− 1 in a corn farm (Zea mays L.) with continuous plastic mulching. This MP concentration far exceeded that recorded in most greenhouse MP studies. Therefore, it is unclear whether mulched soil contaminates the soil more or less with MPs compared with building a greenhouse for growing crops in the same area. It is necessary to determine which of the two agricultural technologies is a lesser source of MPs to the soil. Knowing which of the two practices causes lesser soil contamination can help select a less toxic crop cultivation technology, as the use of both technologies cannot be cut off simultaneously because of their benefits for crop cultivation. To the best of our knowledge, most studies have not considered whether plastic mulched soils pollute soils with MPs to a greater or lesser extent than that caused by a greenhouse; therefore, the data from this study will fill the knowledge gap in this area of research interest. In this study, MP abundance and characteristics in mulched and greenhouse soils were investigated. It can be hypothesized that mulched and greenhouse soils have different MP abundances, polymer types, shapes, and sizes because of the differences in crop planting intensities and the removal of plastic film from mulch soils during crop harvesting stages. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) compare MP abundance between mulched and greenhouse soils and (2) explore MP size, shape, and polymer type in both mulched and greenhouse soils. To achieve this objective, soil samples were collected from both greenhouse and plastic mulching sites in the Haean Basin, an agriculturally dense area in the Republic of Korea. The results of this study will contribute to the prevention and mitigation of soil MP contamination and help to understand the distribution of MPs in greenhouses and mulch soils.
Materials and Methods
Site Description
The study was conducted at an adjacent plastic mulching and greenhouse site in the Haean Basin, approximately 110 km northeast of the capital of the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea), Seoul (128°5′–128°11′E, 38°15′–38°20′N; Fig. 1) [26]. The Haean Basin has a temperate climate, with an average annual precipitation of approximately 1390 mm over the past 25 years, and an average annual temperature of approximately 13.4 °C for the same period [27]. A maximum rainfall of 350.0 mm was recorded in August, and the lowest was 49.8 mm in January (Fig. 2) [28]. The periphery of the Haean Basin is a Precambrian metamorphic complex comprising gneiss, schist, and quartzite. The interior of the basin is biotite granite that intruded into the Precambrian metamorphic complex in the Jurassic and overlying Quaternary alluvial unconformity [21, 27].
The topsoil of the Haean Basin is classified as a coarse soil texture that covers the finer-textured subsoil and underlying dense bedrock material [21]. Greenhouses in this area are commonly used to grow pepper, tomato, and watermelon (Table S1). Greenhouses are often recycled after a period of 5 years. According to Lee et al. [6], apple orchards and ginseng cultivation are increasing in the Haean Basin because of warm climatic changes in the southern part of the country. These orchards and ginseng fields use plastic mulch to increase yield [6]. In this area, plastic mulching was used for eight years before being replaced.
Soil Sample Collection
Topsoil samples (subsamples) were collected as triplicate soil cores at three different points (2 cm apart) within a quadratic area of 0.5 × 0.5 m2 at five randomly selected plots within the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites to determine soil MP abundance, shape, and size distribution [Fig. 3; Table S1], [25, 29]. A stainless-steel ruler and soil cores were used to set the topsoil at 0–10 cm to ensure accurate sampling at each site [30]. Triplicate samples (n = 3) collected from each point within each plot were mixed to form composite samples. After hand-picking any visible material, such as large stones, roots, leaves, and any unidentified litter, 5.0 kg of soil was stored in glass containers to avoid any plastic contamination before being transported to the laboratory (Fig. 3). After transportation, the soil samples were refrigerated at 4.0 °C until analysis [18]. In total, 30 soil samples (three subsamples (1.0 soil depth × 5.0 plots) × 2.0 land use sites) were collected from the plastic mulch and greenhouse sites selected for the study.
Microplastic Extraction
MPs in the soil were extracted and identified at the Korea Institute of Analytical Science and Technology in Seoul, Korea through a sequence of processes, as shown in Fig. 4. The soil samples were air-dried and crushed lightly using a rolling pestle. Soil samples were further filtered through a 5 mm stainless steel sieve to remove impurities, such as plant roots and leaves that could not be handpicked or were not clearly visible to the naked eye [17, 23, 31]. A 5 mm stainless steel mesh was chosen for this study because it met the MP definition, and a relatively small number of roots and leaves were visually observed in the soil samples in this study [32]. Soil (0.5 g) from each sampling point was mixed with 200 mL of 30% H2O2 in a beaker placed on a heating plate at 70 °C for approximately 72 h to completely digest and remove organic matter (Fig. 4).
Subsequently, the filtered soil samples were passed through a 20 μm stainless steel filter. The inorganic materials in the soil samples were extracted by density separation by mixing the soil samples with 40 mL of Li2WO4 solution (1.5 g cm − 3) for 24 h. In this study, Li2WO4 was used as the separation solution because of its high density, non-hazardous nature, ease of extraction of inorganic materials and high MP recovery rate [33, 34]. Precipitated inorganic particles were removed from the solution and the MP-containing supernatant was filtered through a 20.0 μm stainless steel filter. The filter was then placed in a desiccator and dried at room temperature (25.0 °C ± 1.2 °C). After drying, the filters containing the MPs were placed in aluminum containers and covered with aluminum foil prior to identification.
Microplastic Identification
The filters containing the MPs were placed under a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microscope to simultaneously count and identify MPs according to the method described by Bi et al. [35] and Zhang et al. [36]. FT-IR images with a spatial resolution of 5 μm were captured on 32 × 32 focal plane arrays. A scan spectral range of 4000– 650 cm− 1 was set for 32 scans with an acquisition time of 3.0 s and a resolution of 5.0 cm− 1. FT-IR images were analyzed using the automated software MPs Finder (MPF; Purency or simple). The siMple software with a wavenumber range of 2420–2200 cm− 1 was used to count the number of MPs (MP abundance) from each sample and provide comprehensive statistics on the size and polymer type on the filter according to the method described by Cunsolo et al. [37], Primpke et al. [38], and Uurasjärvi et al. [39]. The MPs were divided into the following size classes:20–49, 50–99, 100–299, and 300 μm and above. The composition of the MPs was identified from the infrared spectrum using a micro-Fourier transform interferometer (µ-FTIR, LUMOS II, Brucker, USA). The spectra were compared to the Sattler Spectra Library (purchased standard library), the matching rates were set at less than 60%, and the samples were considered as MP.
Quality Control and Assurance
Cotton and latex gloves were worn while collecting soil samples from the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites. In addition, during the extraction and identification of MPs, cotton laboratory coats and latex gloves were worn to protect soil samples from external MP sources, such as air and clothing. Distilled water was used to rinse the soil auger, stainless steel ruler, mortar and pestle (for crushing the soil), and glass used to store the soil.
In this study, triplicate blank samples were subjected to the same analytical procedure as the actual samples and MPs were not detected in these samples. Using the same method as above, the MP recovery rate was verified by spiking 300 μm PP and PE into 0.5 g of clean soil. The results showed that the recovery of MPs by Li2WO4 was 100%.
Statistical Analyses
Prior to the statistical analysis, the normality of the MPs datasets obtained from greenhouses and plastic mulching sites was checked separately using the Shapiro-Wilk test [29, 40]. Statistical differences in MP polymer type, size, and shape between the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites were checked using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the 5.0% significance level. In addition, the t-test was used to check for statistical differences in the mean values of MP abundance between the greenhouse and the plastic mulching site at a significance level of 5.0%.
Tukey’s test was used for mean separation when ANOVA and t-test showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) [29]. The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used as a substitute test when the datasets did not follow the normality distribution rules; for example, the datasets for MP fibers and fragment shapes did not follow the normality distribution rules [41]. The software Past 4.10 (Systat Software Inc., Oyvind Hammer, Olso, Norway) was used to perform all statistical analyses, and the results are presented as mean values ± standard error.
Results
Microplastic Abundances
MPs were detected in each soil triumvirate sample collected at each sampling point at the greenhouses and plastic mulching sites (Fig. 5; Table S1). In this study, the total MP abundance in the soil of the greenhouse area was 1107 particles kg− 1, with an average abundance of 221.4 particles kg− 1, ranging from 50 to 383 particles kg− 1. At the plastic mulching site, the total MP abundance was 1748.0 particles kg− 1, within a range of 158 to 235 particles kg− 1 and an average of abundance of 356.8 particles kg− 1. However, no significant differences were observed in soil MP abundance between the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites (Fig. 5; t-test, p > 0.05).
Microplastic Polymer Type
In this study, all MP (n = 2855) polymer types were identified using FTIR spectroscopy (Fig. 6a). A total of six variable types of MPs with a spectral match of > 60% were identified from all the soil samples collected from the plastic mulching and greenhouse sites. These MP polymer types were classified as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene amide (PA), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Fig. 6a). PP (70.17% of the total MPs identified) was perceived as the dominant MP polymer type, followed by PE (22.29%), and PET (7.21%). Among the six variable MP polymer types identified in soils in this study, PVC, PA, and PMMA were less than 1.0% (Fig. 6b).
At the greenhouse site, PP (68.02%) was the most significantly dominant MP polymer type; however, no significant difference was observed in MP abundance between PE (21.86%), PET (8.94%), PVC (0.36%), PA (0.54%), and PMMA (0.27%) (p > 0.05). In contrast, PP (71.44%) and PE (21.63%) were the dominant MP polymers (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the MP polymer abundances of PE (6.18%), PET (6.18%), PVC (0.21%), PA (0.53%), and PMMA (0.00%) (p > 0.05; Fig. 6b). The MP polymer types in both greenhouse and mulched soils were matched with the reference spectra, as shown in Figs. 7 and 8.
Microplastic Shapes
In this study, two predominant MP shapes were identified in the greenhouses and plastic mulching sites, the majority of which were transparent or white (Figs. 9 and 10a). Of these MP shapes identified, the fragmented MP shape was observed as the major shape, accounting for 91.01% of the total (mean = 263.1 particles kg− 1). By contrast, fibrous MP types accounted for only 8.99% of the total MP shapes in the soil at the study site (mean = 260.0 particles kg− 1). Overall, fragmented MPs were present in significantly higher proportions than fibrous MPs [p (same med) = 0.0004328)] (Fig. 10a). Although the total number of fragmented MPs (approximately 58.22) at the plastic mulching site was numerically higher than that of fibrous MPs (3.49; p = 0.05), there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between fibrous and fragmented MPs (approximately 5.50) in greenhouse soil (p > 0.05) (Fig. 10b).
Microplastic Size
The MP size distribution for each soil sample is presented in Fig. 11. The MP size distribution for each soil sample collected from greenhouses and plastic mulching sites was divided into four categories:20–49, 50–99, 100–299, and 300 μm and above. Overall, MP sizes of 300 μm and above were detected and accounted for the smallest proportion of MP size distribution in the greenhouses and plastic mulching sites, at 0.42% and 0.311%, respectively. MP sizes of 20–299 μm in the greenhouse and the plastic mulching site accounted for 37.87% and 61.39%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of MP sizes 300 μm, and above (p < 0.05). At the plastic mulching site, MP sizes of 20–49, 50–99, and 100–299 μm showed no significant difference (p > 0.05; Fig. 11). However, MPs of 20–299 μm occurred as a significantly higher proportion of soil MP contamination than MPs of 300 μm and above. In the greenhouse site, MPs of sizes 20–49, 50–99, and 100–299 μm were not significantly different; however, MPs of sizes 50–99, 300 μm, and above were significantly different at p (same mean) = 0.044.
Discussion
Sources of Microplastic Abundance in Mulch and Greenhouse Soils
The average MP concentration of 358.8 particles kg− 1 determined in the mulching site of this study was lower than that of a cotton-plastic mulching site in Hangzhou Bay, China (571 particles kg− 1) [42] and a tobacco plastic mulching farm in Hubei, China (media = 647 particles kg− 1) [24]. The reason for the low concentration of MPs at the mulch site in this study is that the mulch site does not have any form of water irrigation [17]. For instance, according to Kim et al. [19], the water used for irrigation may be an additional source of soil MP pollution. In addition, Samandra et al. [43] reported that irrigation of soil with groundwater may be a source of MP pollution. Several studies have shown that the occasional use of organic or sludge fertilizers to treat soil is another source of MP contamination at plastic mulching sites [44]. However, no fertilization practices were used at the study site, suggesting that the MP concentrations were lower than those observed in other studies [24, 45]. For instance, Stefano et al. [46] reported macroplastic concentrations of approximately 9247 particles/mg in crop fields resulting from the application of organic and conventional fertilizers. These macroplastics can be degraded into MPs in the long run or by soil titling.
In addition, the lower average concentration of MPs (221.4 particles kg− 1) was observed in the greenhouse contrasts with the observations of a few other studies [e.g., Yanju, Korea [media = 379 particles kg− 1, [47], China: average = 5,124 ± 632 particles kg− 1], [48], where high concentrations of MPs were reported. The low average concentration of MPs from the greenhouse site suggests less intensive crop cultivation activity, short-term replacement of plastic films used for the construction of the greenhouse (5 years), and less human interference in the greenhouse compared to other study sites [44]. Despite different levels of soil MP contamination in greenhouses and mulched soils, there was no significant difference in soil MP concentration abundance between the two sites, as in the study by Liu et al. [49]. However, this contrasts with other studies that have reported significantly higher or lower abundances of MPs in plastic mulching soils than in greenhouse soils [19, 44, 49]. The lack of a significant difference in MP abundance between the plastic mulching and greenhouse sites is contrary to our conjecture that plastic mulching sites should have significantly higher MP abundance than greenhouse sites. In addition, a similar abundance of MPs between the two sites can be attributed to the fact that there were no planting activities in this study site, such as water irrigation or sludge application, which would lead to more MP pollution in the soil in a short period of time at the greenhouse site [49]. Plastic films used in greenhouse manufacturing are typically replaced after five years. In Korea, the plastic films used in plastic mulching and greenhouses should be removed after use [22].
Characteristics of Microplastic in Mulch and Greenhouse Soils
Overall, the dominance of the MP polymer PP in this study is consistent with the findings of previous studies [47, 50, 51]. According to Zhang et al. [24] and Xu et al. [25], the dominance of PP throughout the study site can be attributed to the fact that PP is one of the most widely used polymers for plastic films used in the construction of greenhouses and for plastic mulching. In greenhouse sites alone, the dominance of PP in the soil can be attributed to the fact that the weathered plastic films used to build the greenhouse undergo mechanical fragmentation, causing them to settle in the soil [51]. Also, the raw materials used to manufacture the ropes used to support plant growth within the greenhouse are made from PP [23].
Where plastic mulching is in place, the predominance of both PP and PE can be attributed to PE being a widely used polymer in farmlands since 1938 [52, 53]. Furthermore, the dominance of PE in plastic mulching fields suggests that plastic films made from PE polymers that are inadvertently discarded after crops are harvested easily degrade into MPs because of their thinness [23, 42, 48]. In addition, the dominance of PP may be related to soil contamination with MPs from unseen sources, such as MPs and/or atmospheric deposition from crop cultivation tools (e.g., ropes and machine parts used for farming) [25, 54].
This study determined fragment-shaped MPs as the dominant MP shape in the entire study area, which suggests physical and mechanical fragmentation of the plastic materials used either for plastic mulching or the construction of greenhouses [24, 55]. These results support those of previous studies that document fragment-shaped MPs as dominant MP shapes in greenhouse sites or plastic mulching sites [23, 30, 42, 56]. According to Wang et al. [18], the dominance of fragment-shaped MPs in soils from both sites suggests physical weathering by UV-radiation of plastic films used for plastic mulching, wear and tear of plastic films by soil particles, and weathering of abandoned plastic ropes used to support the growth of creeping plants in greenhouses. The lack of a significant difference in the proportion of fragment and fiber-shaped soil MPs in the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites could be discretely associated with the physical weathering of the plastic film used either for mulching or greenhouse construction [18].
In this study, MP sizes of 50–99 μm were dominant at the greenhouse site, which can be because towing to occasional tillage and soil abrasion, which facilitates the physical rupture of plastics deposited in the soils either involuntarily in the greenhouse site during soil preparation before planting or during harvesting [23, 57]. Likewise, at the plastic mulch site, the presence of a large number of MPs smaller than 300 μm may be owing to exposure of the plastic film used for mulching to UV radiation, weathering them to smaller sizes [30]. In addition, the predominance of MPs smaller than 300 μm may be related to the possibility of airborne MP deposition in the soil of the plastic mulching sites [53, 58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].
Conclusion
In this study, the abundance of MP contaminants in greenhouses and plastic mulching topsoil in an agriculture-dominated region of Korea was examined and compared. Overall, soil MP abundance did not vary significantly between the greenhouse and plastic mulching sites. However, some MP polymer types, shapes, and sizes varied between plastic mulching and greenhouse sites. Furthermore, we observed that the dominant shape and size of MPs were fragments smaller than 300 μm in the plastic mulch and greenhouse sites. At the plastic mulching site, MPs made composed of PP and its copolymer PE were dominant. However, at the greenhouse site the dominant, PP was the dominant MP polymer. Following the discovery of MPs in plastic mulch and greenhouse sites, it can be inferred that the possible sources of these MPs are plastic films and plastic ropes. There was no significant difference in abundance between the two sites, suggesting that regardless of the form of plastic film used at the crop sites, they contaminate the soil with MPs in the long run. The results of this study undoubtedly show that both mulched and greenhouse soils are equal sources of MP pollution in crop fields, implying that these soils are significant environmental reservoirs of MPs. These results provide important background data that can be considered for future studies focusing on the sources of MPs and access to groundwater in the agricultural regions of Korea. These results can serve as a reference for reducing and controlling plastic mulch and soil MP pollution at greenhouse sites.
References
Edrisi SA, Rakshit A, Dubey PK, Abhilash PC, Singh SK, Patra AK, Pathak H (2021) Managing Soil Resources for Human Health and Environmental sustainability. In: Rakshit A, Singh S, Abhilash P, Biswas A (eds) Soil Science: Fundamentals to recent advances. Springer., Singapore, pp 3–11
Mohajan H (2019) The first industrial revolution: creation of a new global human era. Int J Humanit Soc 5:377–387
Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ 754:142222
Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan Z, Wang M, Wang F, Li S, Yin Z, Huang L, Fu Y, Li L, Chang SX (2021) Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innov 2:100180
Lee J-Y (2022) Emerging contaminants in soil and groundwater systems: Occurrence, impact, fate and transport edited by Bin Gao. Epis J Int Geosci 45:345–346
Lee JG, Cho SR, Jeong ST, Hwang HY, Kim PJ (2019) Different response of plastic film mulching on greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between chemical and organic fertilization in maize upland soil. Sci Total Environ 696:133827
Kopittke PM, Menzies NW, Wang P, McKenna BA, Lombi E (2019) Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environ Inter 132:105078
Schulte LA, Dale BE, Bozzetto S, Liebman M, Souza GM, Haddad N, Richard TL, Basso B, Brown RC, Hilbert JA, Arbuckle JG (2022) Meeting global challenges with regenerative agriculture producing food and energy. Nat Sustain 5:384–388
Chia RW, Lee JY, Jang J, Lee S (2022) Effects of land use change on soil moisture content at different soil depths. J Geol Soc Korea 58:117–135
Das SK, Prasad SK, Laha R, Mishra VK (2022) Land Degradation Neutrality. Biotica Res Today 4:181–183
Rust N, Lunder OE, Iversen S, Vella S, Oughton EA, Breland TA, Glass JH, Maynard CM, McMorran R, Reed MS (2022) Perceived Causes and Solutions to Soil Degradation in the UK and Norway. Land 11:131
Nawaz A, Farooq M, Ul-Allah S, Gogoi N, Lal R, Siddique KH (2021) Sustainable soil management for food security in South Asia. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:258–275
Devi RS, Kannan VR, Natarajan K, Nivas D, Kannan K, Chandru S, Antony AR (2016) The role of microbes in plastic degradation. Environ Waste Manage 341:341–370
Rasmussen SC (2021) From parkesine to celluloid: the birth of organic plastics. Angew Chem 133:8090–8094
Craig C, Fox DW, Zhai L, Walters LJ (2022) In-situ microplastic egestion efficiency of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mar Pollut Bull 178:113653
Jethy B, Paul S, Das SK, Adesina A, Mustakim SM (2022) Critical review on the evolution, properties, and utilization of plasticwastes for construction applications. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24:435–451
Huang Y, Liu Q, Jia W, Yan C, Wang J (2020) Agricultural plastic mulching as a source of microplastics in the terrestrial environment. Environ Pollut 260:114096
Wang K, Chen W, Tian J, Niu F, Xing Y, Wu Y, Xu L (2022) Accumulation of microplastics in greenhouse soil after long-term plastic film mulching in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 828:154544
Kim SK, Kim JS, Lee H, Lee HJ (2021) Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in soils with different agricultural practices: importance of sources with internal origin and environmental fate. J Hazard Mater 403:123997
Wang X, Fan J, Xing Y, Xu G, Wang H, Deng J, Wang Y, Zhan F, Li P, Li Z (2019) The effects of mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil environment of crop plants. Adv Agron 153:121–173
Raza M, Lee JY (2019) Factors affecting spatial pattern of groundwater hydrochemical variables and nitrate in agricultural region of Korea. Episodes 42:135–148
Lee JG, Chae HG, Hwang HY, Kim PJ, Cho SR (2021) Effect of plastic film mulching on maize productivity and nitrogen use efficiency under organic farming in South Korea. Sci Total Environ 787:147503
Haixin Z, Yimei H, Shaoshan A, Haohao L, Xiaoqian D, Pan W, Mengyuan F (2022) Land-use patterns determine the distribution of soil microplastics in typical agricultural areas on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J Hazard Mater 426:127806
Zhang Z, Peng W, Duan C, Zhu X, Wu H, Zhang X, Fang L (2022b) Microplastics pollution from different plastic mulching years accentuate soil microbial nutrient limitations. Gondwana Res 108:91–101
Xu L, Han L, Li J, Zhang H, Jones K, Xu EG (2022) Missing relationship between meso-and microplastics in adjacent soils and sediments. J Hazard Mater 424:127234
Lee J-Y, Lee KS, Park Y, Choi H-M, Jo Y-J (2013) Chemical and isotopic compositions of groundwater and stream water in a heavy agricultural basin of Korea. J Geol Soc India 82:169–180
Lee J-Y, Cha J, Chia RW (2022) Current status of researches on microplastics in groundwater and perspectives. J Geol Soc Korea 58:233–241
Korea Meteorological Administration (2022) https://www.weather.go.kr/w/index.do/
Chia RW, Son Y, Cho W, Lee YG, Tsetsegmaa G, Kang H (2020) Do different land use changes in a deciduous forest ecosystem result in alterations in soil organic C and total N stocks? Plant Soil 457:153–165
Xu G, Yang L, Xu L, Yang J (2022a) Soil microplastic pollution under different land uses in tropics, southwestern China. Chemosphere 289:133176
Chia RW, Lee JY, Jang J, Cha J (2022) Errors and recommended practices that should be identified to reduce suspected concentrations of microplastics in soil and groundwater: a review. Environ Tech Innov 28:102933
Perez CN, Carré F, Hoarau-Belkhiri A, Joris A, Leonards PE, Lamoree MH (2022) Innovations in analytical methods to assess the occurrence of microplastics in soil. J Environ Chem Engr 10:107421
Cutroneo L, Reboa A, Geneselli I, Capello M (2021) Considerations on salts used for density separation in the extraction of microplastics from sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 166:112216
Tirkey A, Upadhyay LS (2021) Microplastics: an overview on separation, identification and characterization of microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull 170:112604
Bi D, Wang B, Li Z, Zhang Y, Ke X, Huang C, Liu W, Luo Y, Christie P, Wu L (2023) Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in coastal plain soils under three land-use types. Sci Total Environ 855:159023
Zhang H, Huang Y, An S, Zhao J, Xiao L, Li H, Huang Q (2022) Microplastics trapped in soil aggregates of different land-use types: a case study of Loess Plateau terraces, China. Environ Pollut 310:119880
Cunsolo S, Williams J, Hale M, Read DS, Couceiro F (2021) Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions. Anal Bioanal Chem 413:3789–3799
Primpke S, Cross RK, Mintenig SM, Simon M, Vianello A, Gerdts G, Vollertsen J (2020) Toward the systematic identification of microplastics in the environment: evaluation of a new independent software tool (siMPle) for spectroscopic analysis. Appl Spectrosc 74:1127–1138
Uurasjärvi E, Sainio E, Setälä O, Lehtiniemi M, Koistinen A (2021) Validation of an imaging FTIR spectroscopic method for analyzing microplastics ingestion by finnish lake fish (Perca fluviatilis and Coregonus albula). Environ Pollut 288:117780
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621
Zhou B, Wang J, Zhang H, Shi H, Fei Y, Huang S, Tong Y, Wen D, Luo Y, Barceló D (2020) Microplastics in agricultural soils on the coastal plain of Hangzhou Bay, east China: multiple sources other than plastic mulching film. J Hazard Mater 388:121814
Samandra S, Johnston JM, Jaeger JE, Symons B, Xie S, Currell M, Ellis AV, Clarke BO (2022) Microplastic contamination of an unconfined groundwater aquifer in Victoria, Australia. Sci Total Environ 802:149727
Feng S, Lu H, Liu Y (2021) The occurrence of microplastics in farmland and grassland soils in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau: different land use and mulching time in facility agriculture. Environ Pollut 279:116939
Harms IK, Diekötter T, Troegel S, Lenz M (2021) Amount, distribution and composition of large microplastics in typical agricultural soils in Northern Germany. Sci The Total Environ 758:143615
Stefano N, Pleissner D (2022) Quantification and analysis of surface macroplastic contamination on arable areas. J Soils Sediments 22:757–768
Choi YR, Kim YN, Yoon JH, Dickinson N, Kim KH (2021) Plastic contamination of forest, urban, and agricultural soils: a case study of Yeoju City in the Republic of Korea. J Soils Sediment 21:1962–1973
Wang J, Li J, Liu S, Li H, Chen X, Peng C, Zhang P, Liu X (2021b) Distinct microplastic distributions in soils of different land-use types: a case study of chinese farmlands. Environ Pollut 269:116199
Liu X, Tang N, Yang W, Chang J (2022) Microplastics pollution in the soils of various land-use types along Sheshui River basin of Central China. Sci Total Environ 806:150620
Feng S, Lu H, Tian P, Xue Y, Lu J, Tang M, Feng W (2020) Analysis of microplastics in a remote region of the Tibetan Plateau: implications for natural environmental response to human activities. Sci Total Environ 739:140087
Chouchene K, Nacci T, Modugno F, Castelvetro V, Ksibi M (2022) Soil contamination by microplastics in relation to local agricultural development as revealed by FTIR, ICP-MS and pyrolysis-GC/MS. Environ Pollut 303:119016
Bläsing M, Amelung W (2018) Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources. Sci Total Environ 612:422–435
Boughattas I, Hattab S, Zitouni N, Mkhinini M, Missawi O, Bousserrhine N, Banni M (2021) Assessing the presence of microplastic particles in tunisian agriculture soils and their potential toxicity effects using Eisenia andrei as bioindicator. Sci Total Environ 796:148959
Piehl S, Leibner A, Löder MG, Dris R, Bogner C, Laforsch C (2018) Identification and quantification of macro-and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Sci Rep 8:1–9
Zhang Y, Wang K, Chen W, Ba Y, Khan K, Chen W, Tu C, Chen C, Xu L (2022a) Effects of land use and landscape on the occurrence and distribution of microplastics in soil, China. Sci Total Environ 847:157598
Álvarez-Lopeztello J, Robles C, del Castillo RF (2021) Microplastic pollution in neotropical rainforest, savanna, pine plantations, and pasture soils in lowland areas of Oaxaca, Mexico: preliminary results. Ecol Indic 121:107084
Yu L, Zhang J, Liu Y, Chen L, Tao S, Liu W (2021) Distribution characteristics of microplastics in agricultural soils from the largest vegetable production base in China. Sci Total Environ 756:143860
Tian X, Yang M, Guo Z, Chang C, Li J, Guo Z, Wang R, Li Q, Zou X (2022) Plastic mulch film induced soil microplastic enrichment and its impact on wind-blown sand and dust. Sci Total Environ 813:152490
Maja MM, Ayano SF (2021) The impact of population growth on natural resources and farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries. Earth Syst Environ 5:271–283
Nemali K (2022) History of controlled environment horticulture: greenhouses. HortScience 57:239–246
Parlato MC, Valenti F, Porto SM (2020) Covering plastic films in greenhouses system: a GIS-based model to improve post use suistainable management. J Environ Manage 263:110389
Soussi M, Chaibi MT, Buchholz M, Saghrouni Z (2022) Comprehensive review on climate control and cooling systems in greenhouses under Hot and arid conditions. Agronomy 12:626
Yano A, Cossu M (2019) Energy sustainable greenhouse crop cultivation using photovoltaic technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 109:116–137
Sahaidak T, Huzynets N (2021) Investigation of Greenhouse Monitoring and Control System. Advanc Cyber-Phys Syst 6:54–62
Chia RW, Lee JY, Kim H, Jang J (2021) Microplastic pollution in soil and groundwater: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:4211–4224
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Measurement and Risk assessment Program for Management of Microplastics Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2020003110010) and this research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No.2019R1A6A1A03033167).
Funding
This work was funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2020003110010) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No.2019R1A6A1A03033167).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RWChia: Writing of original draft, conceptualization, statistical analysis, formal analysis, validation, writing – review, and editing of subsequent drafts and investigation. J-YL: Supervision, resources, review and editing, and funding acquisition. SL: Drew figures, Investigation and Resources. ML: Investigation, drew figures, review and editing. All authors read and approved the manuscript’s final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chia, R.W., Lee, JY., Lee, M. et al. Comparison of Microplastic Characteristics in Mulched and Greenhouse Soils of a Major Agriculture Area, Korea. J Polym Environ 31, 2216–2229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02746-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02746-1