Abstract
Hydrogels are a kind of three dimensional polymeric network system which has a significant amount of water imbibing capacity despite being soluble in it. Because of the potential applications of hydrogels in different fields such as biomedical, pharmaceutical, personal care products, biosensors, and cosmetics, it has become a very popular area of research in recent decades. Hydrogels, prepared from synthetic polymers and petrochemicals are not ecofriendly. For preparing biodegradable hydrogels, most available plant polysaccharides like starch are utilized. In its structure, starch has a large number of hydroxyl groups that aid in hydrogel networking. For their easy availability and applications, starch-based hydrogels (SHs) have gained huge attention. Moreover, SHs are non-toxic, biocompatible, and cheap. For these reasons, SHs can be an alternative to synthetic hydrogels. The main focus of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the structure and characteristics of starch, preparation, and characterization of SHs. This review also addresses several potential multidimensional applications of SHs and shows some future aspects in accordance.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hydrogels are called hydrophilic polymeric networks with huge water absorption capability (up to thousand times their dry weight) [1,2,3]. Hydrogels can be prepared from both synthetic and natural materials. The key feature of hydrogels is their large amount of solvent (e.g., water, biological fluids) retaining ability under different conditions. Like living tissue, hydrogels are soft and flexible which makes them a very suitable material for various potential applications [4]. In recent decades, hydrogels have been used in various important areas such as in tissue engineering [5,6,7], in delivery of drugs [8, 9], wound treatment [10, 11], for the purification of water [12,13,14], in biomedical sectors [15, 16], in production of personal care items [17,18,19] and agriculture [20, 21]. Another significant character of hydrogels is their responding ability to different environmental conditions such as the change of temperature, pH, variation in magnetic fields, and some electric stimuli. Due to having the ability to quickly respond to the environment, they are called smart polymers (e.g., stimuli-responsive hydrogels). Hydrogels are also termed as novel biomaterials of this era because of some unique properties like (I) ability of biodegradation, (II) stability in chemicals and bio-fluids, (III) stable shape, (IV) biocompatible and ecofriendly, (V) large absorption capability of metabolites and nutrients which are soluble in water [22]. The use of hydrogels as bio-material is also well-known because of their permeability of small molecules, soft consistency, low interfacial tension like the properties of living tissues [23]. The use of hydrogels is growing steadily because of their unique properties [24,25,26].
In the polymeric structure of hydrogel networks, covalent bonds are involved due to the reaction between the co-monomers and hydrogen bonds and the interaction of van der Waals force between the chains and physical crosslinking can be associated [17]. The cross-linked structure of hydrogels prohibits them from disintegration at the time of water-retaining. Generally, crosslinking agents are used along with the polymers for the initiation of chemical crosslinking in hydrogel networks. In hydrogels, there is the presence of different hydrophilic groups like –COOH, –SO3H, –OH, and –NH2 which increase the hydrophilic property of the networks [27]. The water retention ability of hydrogels depends on two main factors—interactions of polymeric chains with water and temperature. A number of steps are involved in the water retention process of hydrogels—(I) hydrophilic groups present in hydrogels are hydrated, (II) interaction of water with the hydrophobic groups in hydrogels, (III) dilution of the hydrogels are stopped by crosslinks present in hydrogel networks, so the additional water can be absorbed [28].
Synthetic polymers are heavily used to manufacture hydrogels that are currently available on the market because they show some outstanding mechanical, physical, and chemical properties. They also have some drawbacks too. They are not ecofriendly, production is not cost-effective, nonrenewable and bio-degradation is difficult [8]. For these reasons hydrogels produced from naturally produced polysaccharides like starch and cellulose are getting more attention from researchers [29,30,31,32,33,34]. In starch, hydrophilic groups (e.g., –OH) are distributed in the molecular chains [35, 36]. These groups increase the hydrophilic character and biodegradability of the resulting hydrogels [37]. An abundant amount of starch is naturally produced in plants by the photosynthesis process by using CO2 and water [38,39,40]. Plants are an abundant source of starch polysaccharides in which chloroplasts of the green leaves and amyloplasts of the tubers and seeds contain a large amount of starch as granules [41,42,43]. Potatoes, wheat, corn, and rice are the main production source of commercial starch [44]. Mainly by three steps of hydration–plasticization starch, turns into gelatin. Hydrophilic starch granules adsorb water and swell in the first step. The granule structure destructed when the starch is dissolved in water and form gelatin in the second step. The final step consists of starch hydrogel network formation by cooling and aging and the structure of polysaccharide get reorganized. This step is also called the step of retrogradation. Hydrogel formation primarily depends on the amount of amylose present in starch and the temperature of gelatin formation [45, 46]. For these characteristics and easy availability, hydrogel formation by starch has become popular from the 1970s [47, 48]. In addition, starch-based hydrogel products have gained attention for reducing the impact on the environment and more potential applicability [49,50,51].
To prepare SHs, various chemical methods can be utilized such as etherification and grafting method of starch. In etherified starches, various ether groups like carboxymethyl starch substitute the –OH groups from the starch structure. On the contrary, hydrogels are produced by grafting different vinyl monomers on starch in the grafted starch method. The use of SHs in different fields has both merits and demerits. Some merits of the use of SHs are—(I) ample in nature, (II) available all over the world, (III) cheap and attractive, (IV) preparation methods are comparatively easier, (V) eco-friendly, (VI) solvent absorption capacity is higher, (VII) usable in different process [52]. Some drawbacks of SHs are—(I) surface area is low, (II) for enhancing the sorption capacity chemical derivatization is needed, (III) low durability, etc. [53, 54]. Although being completely biodegradable, the use of SHs is quite a few in different fields like drug delivery systems [55]. But other polymers like poly (lactic acid) (PLA), poly (glycolic acid) (PGA) are being used in this field [56,57,58,59]. Hence more study should be continued on SHs.
Henceforth, this review aims to provide a brief overview of the characteristics and structure of starch and SHs with an emphasis on their recent developments. In addition, properties and different potential applications of SHs have been discussed. Specifically, this review provides a summary of several synthesis pathways of SHs, and finally, some of the gaps future research directions have also been suggested.
Characteristics and Structure of Starch
Starches are polysaccharides. Monosaccharides (glucose units) are bonded together by α-D-(1–4) and α-D-(1–6) linkages in starch structure [60,61,62]. In the starch structure, there are primarily two types of polysaccharides, which are amylose and amylopectin representing about 98–99% dry weight of starch [63, 64]. Amylose (molecular weight approximately 1 × 105–1 × 106) and amylopectin (molecular weight approximately 1 × 107–1 × 109) have different structures [44, 65,66,67,68]. Amylose has a linear structure whereas amylopectin is composed of branched linkage [61, 63]. The structure of starch is shown in Fig. 1. The amount of amylose and amylopectin present in starch mainly depends on two factors which are—(I) source of the starch (potato, wheat, corn) and (II) polysaccharide crystallinity [69]. The proportion of the amorphous and crystalline mass in starch is about 70% and 30% respectively [70].
The main component of the amorphous region in starch is amylose. Although a very small amount of amylopectin is available in the amorphous part, the crystalline region mainly consists of amylopectin [71]. In water, amylose solubility is high and a helical structure is formed [72]. Starches occur as a form of granular structure in the plant's body and amylopectin can form a helical structure and crystallized. The hydrogen bonds occurred by the –OH groups present in the starch surface are the main reason for exhibiting hydrophilic property and strong inter-molecular attraction by starch granules [30, 64]. Starches contain a huge amount of –OH groups in their structure. In each glucose unit of starch, there are two types of –OH groups present. One is secondary –OH group (at carbon 2 and 3 positions) and another is primary –OH group (carbon 6 position when it is not linked). The reactivity of starch is highly dependent on these –OH groups. Starch can be oxidized or reduced and form hydrogen bonds, esters, and ethers [73].
As starch is hydrophilic in nature, water molecules can change the internal interaction and morphological arrangements of starch. For this reason various properties of starch such as physical and mechanical properties and glass transition temperature (Tg) dependent on water content [74]. One of the important properties of starch is complete biodegradability in different environments. Using microorganism or enzymatic reaction, glucose can be found from starch by hydrolysis process. Further, it can be metabolized into CO2 and water [75]. Starch is biocompatible, non-toxic, cheap, shows good mechanical properties, and easily available [76, 77]. Although starches are found abundantly in nature, it has some drawbacks such as dimensional stability is low in native starch, comparatively poor gel content, mechanical properties, and processability are also poor for the end products [78,79,80]. For this reason, using native starch is not feasible. Thus, by using chemical or/and physical interaction, starches need to be modified [81, 82]. In this regard, SHs can be good starch based product for various potential applications.
Classifications of Hydrogels
There are various types of hydrogel depending on different properties, such as (I) swelling property, (II) physical characteristics, (III) preparation technique, (IV) source, (V) biodegradation property, and (VI) crosslinking nature [4, 8, 83,84,85]. Different types of hydrogels are shown in Fig. 2. Physical crosslinking techniques are utilized in the physical gels (reversible for conformational changes) achieved by chain aggregation, the complexion of polymer chain, and hydrogen bonding. In chemical hydrogels process like covalent crosslinking is used. But chemical hydrogels are irreversible in nature for their configurational changes. On the other hand, both the chemical and physical hydrogels are combined in dual-network hydrogels. Dual-network hydrogels are more advantageous than the physical and chemical hydrogels because they can retain a comparatively large amount of liquid and their sensitivity in different pH range is higher than the chemical or physical hydrogels alone. Recently, Cong et al. [86] and Yalpani [87] introduced a dual-network hydrogel with comparatively higher mechanical characteristics by combining graphene–polymer composites. Hydrogels can be either natural or synthetic depending on their origins [88]. Depending on the monomers used in the preparation of hydrogels, they can be homopolymeric or copolymeric hydrogels. In the hemolytic hydrogels, a single type of monomer is used [89]. On the other hand, two or more types of monomers are utilized for the preparation of copolymeric hydrogels [90]. They are arranged in different ways in the polymeric chain such as random, block, or alternating configurations. Another important class of hydrogel is interpenetrating polymeric hydrogel (IPN). Both the cross-linked and non-cross-linked polymers are present in the semi IPN hydrogels [91, 92].
Responsive hydrogels are also an important type of hydrogel because they are sensitive to different environmental conditions like temperature, pressure, pH, etc. [93]. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels are smart hydrogels that are sensitive to environmental stimuli [94,95,96,97]. Molecular interactions change due to the change in chemical (pH, ionic factors, chemical agents) and physical (light, pressure, temperature, electric fields, magnetic fields, mechanical stress) stimuli change [4]. In biomedical and pharmaceutical and biomedical sectors stimuli-responsive hydrogels are very popular [98].
With the alteration of surrounding temperature, swelling and shrinkage of the hydrogels change in thermo-responsive hydrogels [99]. Dai et al. [100] prepared thermo-responsive hydrogel by the copolymerization of polyacrylamide and poly(acrylic acid) for controlled drug delivery system. They can be both positive and negative temperature-responsive hydrogels [101].
pH responsive hydrogels are another important type of hydrogels that can response to the change of the pH of the environment and for this property, this type of hydrogels are widely used in drug delivery systems [102,103,104,105,106]. The degree of ionization in pH sensitive hydrogels change instantly for the change in medium pH [107]. pH responsive hydrogels can be anionic (contains carboxylic or sulfonic acid pendent groups) and cationic type (amine pendant groups) [108,109,110,111]. Han et al. (2020) prepared dual pH-responsive hydrogel actuator and successfully used in lipophilic drug delivery system [112].
Hydrogel Preparation Techniques
Hydrogels are hydrophilic polymer networks. According to the different application aspects, hydrogels are prepared by different methods using both hydrophilic and hydrophobic monomers. Either synthetic polymers or natural polymers are used in hydrogel preparation. Although hydrogels prepared from synthetic polymers are mechanically much stronger than the natural ones, they are less biodegradable [113, 114]. The main task during the hydrogel production is creating crosslinking between the monomers using different types of crosslinkers. Copolymerization/cross-linking free-radical polymerizations are commonly used methods for hydrogel production. Mainly hydrogels are prepared from the monomers considering the bond forming principles below [92, 115]:
-
a.
Physical interaction between the monomers,
-
b.
Linking polymer chains via chemical reaction,
-
c.
Using ionizing radiation.
Monomer, initiator, and cross-linker are three major parts of hydrogel production. Diluents are used for controlling the hydrogel properties. Different polymerization techniques for hydrogel preparation are described below.
Bulk Polymerization
Bulk polymerization is one of the simplest methods of hydrogel preparation. This method mainly consists of different monomers, initiators, and a suitable amount of crosslinking agents. Vinyl monomers are highly used in this technique. A wide variety of monomers are used for altering the physical characteristics of final hydrogel products [92]. Chemical catalysts and radiation is used for initiating the reaction. Initiators are selected according to the monomers and solvents. The degree of polymerization and polymerization rate are high in this method. Rods, particles, films and membranes, as well as emulsions, are all possible forms for the bulk polymerized hydrogels [115].
Solution Polymerization
In this technique, copolymerization occurs between the monomers with the help of crosslinkers. UV-irradiation or redox initiator initiates the reactions. The solvents used in the polymerization work as a heating bath for the reaction which is the main advantage of this method compared to the bulk polymerization. This process is much preferred because of cost-effectiveness, easy preparation and heat control. At the beginning of this method concentration of monomers are kept high and low concentration of initiators and crosslinkers are utilized [116]. For removing the impurities and unreacted monomers the prepared hydrogels are washed with distilled water. Different types of solvents are used in this polymerization method such as water, ethanol, and benzyl alcohol, etc. [115]. Hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) and carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt hydrogels were prepared by Sannino et al. [117,118,119,120] using this polymerization method. Keeping water as a common solvent they prepared hydrogels altering different crosslinkers and catalysts.
Free Radical Polymerization
Free radical polymerization is a common chain-growth polymerization technique [121]. The main advantages of this technique are—it is a fast technique, can be carried out as bulk, solution (also in water), emulsion, and suspension polymerization. Acrylates, vinyl lactams, and amides monomers are highly used in this process. Free radical polymerization technique include different steps such as propagation, chain transfer, initiation, and termination [115]. This process starts with the decay of initiators and free radicals generate which attack the monomers to make them active [122]. Polymerization stops during the termination stage with the deactivation of the active center.
Suspension Polymerization
Suspension polymerization is a technique in which monomers and initiators are dispersed in the organic phase and create a homogeneous mixture. The reacting molecules are dispersed as minute droplets in the continuous phase. The heat is transferred from the droplets to the water, which has a large heat capacity and a low viscosity. Preparation of hydrogels by this method is dependent on different conditions such as monomer viscosity, speed of the agitation, and rotor design [123,124,125]. One advantage of this method is that additional grinding is not necessary for the prepared hydrogel product because hydrogels are obtained in the powder or beads form. A low hydrophilic–lipophilic-balance (HLB) suspending agent is required to be added in the dispersion because of the thermal instability of the dispersion [92].
Physical Cross-linking
Physical cross-linking is one of the easiest ways of hydrogel formation by crosslinking the polymers. This process is gaining popularity because of its ease of production and an additional cross-linking agent is not required. Physical hydrogels are also called self-assembled hydrogels. Different types of interactions occurred between the macromolecules such as hydrophobic, polyelectrolyte complexation, electrostatic, and H-bonding [126]. These physical interactions prevent the dilution of the product hydrogels. These interactions are reversible and can be altered by changing physical conditions [127]. As toxic cross-linkers are not used in this method, it is much usable in the biomedical applications like drug delivery systems. In preparation of hydrogels by physical crosslinking, different methods like heating/cooling of polymer solution, complex coacervation, ionic interaction, hydrogen bonding are utilized [115].
Chemical Cross-linking
For the production of mechanically stable hydrogels, the chemical cross-linking method is highly used. For grafting the monomers and cross-link the polymers, different types of cross-linkers are used. Cross-linking is produced by the reaction between the functional groups (e.g., –OH, –COOH, and –NH2) of the monomers and cross-linking agents (e.g., -glutaraldehyde, adipic acid dihydrazide) [128]. Mainly covalent bonds are developed between the polymer chains [129]. Sometimes toxic cross-linking agents are used which need to be extracted before using the gel for different purposes [126]. For instance, there are huge number of hydroxyl groups present in starch and PVA structures. PVA–starch based hydrogels can be prepared using glutaraldehyde as cross-linking agent where glutaraldehyde replaces the –OH groups and intermolecular bridges are formed [2].
Hydrophilic Nature of Hydrogel
Depending on the techniques of absorbing water, hygroscopic materials are mainly two types—(I) Chemical absorbers and (II) Physical absorbers. Chemical reaction is occurred when chemical absorbers (e.g. metal hydrides) absorb water and the properties of the absorbers are completely altered. On the other hand, different mechanisms work behind the absorption of water in physical absorber which are—(I) reversible changes in crystal structure, (II) physical water entanglement in the porous framework, (III) combining with second mechanism hydration of functional groups and (IV) thermodynamic expansion and dissolution of polymeric chains are prohibited by crosslinking with combining second and third mechanism [130]. Two types of water can be present in hydrogels which are free water and bound water. Most of the polar and hydrophilic groups present in the hydrogel are hydrated during the absorption of water molecules by dry hydrogel which results in the “primary bound water”. Further, “secondary bound water or hydrophobically-bound water” results when the swelling of the polymeric network starts and hydrophobic groups are exposed interacting with the water molecule. The combination of the primary and secondary bound water is termed as “total bound water” [17]. The hydrogel networks start to gain more water molecules when the bound water is interacted with the hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts of the networks because of the osmotic driving forces for complete dilution. Physical and covalent cross-linkages present in the hydrogel network restrict the additional swelling which results in an elastic polymeric network. For this reason, infinite dilution cannot be occurred in hydrogel and reaches an equilibrium swelling. Various groups such as polar groups, ionic groups, and hydrophobic groups absorb the additional water and are saturated with bound water which is termed as “free water”. Big pores and voids along with the gaps between the polymeric chains of hydrogels can be filled by free water [3].
Different Crosslinking Strategies of Starch-Based Hydrogels
Hydrogels possess three dimensional networks in their structure. The formation of crosslinking between the chains of macromolecules is the main aim during the synthesis of hydrogel which finally develops three dimensional networks [131]. At the primary stage of the network structure development, branched polymers are formed first. The size of these branched polymers gradually develops and finally forms the structure of gel networks. This gel network formation process is called gelation or sol–gel transition. Different processes can be utilized for the development of these crosslinking networks. Properties of hydrogels including swelling and several physical characteristics mainly depend on the degree of crosslinking [132, 133]. This crosslinking either can be physical [134] or chemical [131, 135] (Fig. 3). Researchers have utilized different synthesis routes for the development of polysaccharide-based hydrogels (e.g., cellulose, starch, chitin) [22, 136]. The stability of the hydrogels prepared by physical blending is not very good although they are insoluble in aqueous media. These types of hydrogels are reversible in nature [137, 138]. Oppositely, chemically crosslinked hydrogels are more stable forming covalent crosslinking [139].
Chemical cross-linking in hydrogels can be achieved in different ways such as—(I) different reagents (bi or multifunctional) can be reacted with polymers, (II) polymerize end functional macromonomers, and (III) click reactions between different polymeric groups [140,141,142].
By functionalizing, reactive groups can be added with polymers or they can exist in polymer precursors. Different crosslinking agents (glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, epoxy compounds, dialdehyde) are used which are low or high molecular weight [144,145,146,147]. In physical crosslinking, hydrogen bonding or interaction between the opposite charge macromolecules are incorporated [148]. Although crosslinking structure and composition are more perfect in chemical crosslinking, sometimes crosslinking agents used in this process are toxic. But in physical crosslinking, comparatively mild conditions are utilized. For this reason, they could be utilized in drugs or other biomaterials for encapsulation [3]. In situ techniques are utilized in quick crosslinking (both physical and chemical crosslinking). Different parameters govern this process like-macromolecular structure (amount of crystalline or amorphous region, presence of functional groups) and environmental parameters (temperature, pH) [143].
Physical Blend
Although chemical cross-linking is more advantageous than other mechanisms due to its wide versatility, it has some drawbacks too. The reagents used for chemical crosslinking in this process are usually toxic and high temperature is needed for the reaction which is not very suitable for the bio-active materials [149]. In this regard, the physical cross-linking process has advantages for using in life science (e.g., tissue engineering) and bio-medical sectors (e.g., drug delivery) [143].
In physically blended hydrogel, different forces (hydrophobic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and ionic interaction) act for the cross-linking of the networks, and cross-linking agents are not necessary. For SHs production, different techniques have been used such as heat-induced aggregation, freeze-drying, and complex coacervation [22]. Hydrogel is formed along with the formation of helix and junction jones when the hot solution of polysaccharides is cooled. For the development of carrageen hydrogels from the hot solution, the cooling process was used [150]. Produced hydrogels become more stable if K+, Na+ like salts are present. A new technology for the formation of physically blended hydrogel is stereocomplex in which lactic acid and methyl methacrylate oligomers are used. Coupling is formed between polymer chains and oligomers. De Jong et al. 152] synthesized self-assembled hydrogels by stereocomplex by grafting enantiomeric lactic oligomers in dextran.
Gelation of native starch is easy [151]. By thermal treatment, hydration starts in starch resulting in gelation [152, 153]. For starch aerogel formation, gelating behavior is combined with emulsion [153]. By retrogradation, heating the starch solution and finally drying starch aerogel is formed [154]. Different characteristics (e.g., swelling and release properties) of starch hydrogels are changeable by modifying the non-ionic components [155, 156]. By utilizing the freezing/thawing process repeatedly, physical PVA based ecofriendly hydrogel can be easily developed [157, 158]. Using the graft copolymerization process PVA–starch based hydrogels are synthesized by radical copolymerization and alcoholysis [159, 160]. Starch-based networks are highly improved blending with PVA [161]. By utilizing the freezing and thawing method starch-g-PVA hydrogel is prepared [162, 163]. A nano-precipitation method is utilized for preparing SHs which are pH-sensitive [164].
Blend with Synthetic Degradable Polymers
Previously, starch carbon–carbon backbone was utilized for making vinyl polymers biodegradable [165]. Due to the use of starch, the total surface area increases which enhance the attack of microorganisms. By this process, the biodegradability increased slightly but was not totally eco-friendly [30]. Biodegradable polymers can be utilized to prepare completely biodegradable hydrogel blending with starch. Aliphatic polyesters, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and biopolymers are highly utilized for blending with starch [166,167,168]. Enhancing biodegradability along with maintaining cost-effectiveness and other characteristics are the main aim of this blending [169, 170]. In respect of biodegradability, PLA (polyacetic acid) is a good polyester and has wide use in biomedical sectors. Some of the excellent features of PLA are high biocompatibility, high strength, and modulus. PLA has some drawbacks too—comparatively costly, shows physical aging when applied (brittle under load) [3, 171]. For increasing their compatibility poly (hydroxyester ether) and poly(vinyl alcohol) are used [172, 173]. Researches have been attempted to produce hydrogel by blending starch polysaccharides and PLA [171, 174]. Starch granules are hydrophilic in nature and PLA is hydrophobic. For this reason, the interfacial interaction between them is low resulting in poor mechanical properties of the blend [175]. To overcome this drawback, different plasticizers have been utilized such as glycerol, sorbitol, and formamide, etc. [176] Suitable compatibilizers can also be used for enhancing the compatibility between starch and PLA. Gelatinization is another technique that increases the interfacial affinity. This method helps in easy dissolve of the starch granules and dispersion is also good [177, 178]. Polycaprolactone (PCL) is an eco-friendly and biodegradable polymer that was also used for blending with starch. PCL/starch blends were formed by reinforcing with nano-clay and fiber etc. which showed improved biodegradability, hydrolytic stability [179, 180].
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a water-soluble synthetic polymer with good biodegradability. It is compatible with starch and shows good mechanical characteristics. For this reason, PVA is most widely used for blending with starch [36]. In different microbial conditions, both the starch and PVA are degradable which resulting in a completely biodegradable PVS/starch blend polymer [171, 181]. Isolated microorganisms from landfill and municipal sewage line were used for the biodegradability test which shows the complete biodegradable nature of the blend [182]. Processability and mechanical properties are also excellent because of the bonding between the –OH groups of PVA and the chain of starch [183, 184]. With rising PVA concentration, tensile strength also improved [182]. For increasing the compatibility of other starch-based blends such as starch/PLA, PVA is utilized. A continuous phase is developed between the starch and PVA during blending because both of them are polyols [173]. The interfacial interaction of starch and PLA is poor where starch works as a filler and is loaded in PLA matrix without PVA.
Blend with Biopolymers
Due to biodegradability and other characteristics of different polysaccharides like cellulose and chitosan, they are investigated for blending with starch. Another reason is the easy availability of starch and chitosan polysaccharides in nature, they are inexpensive, non-toxic, and renewable as well [185]. Starch has a huge amount of –OH groups and chitosan has –OH and –NH3 groups in their structure. The main mechanism behind this blending is the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl and amino groups. The blended hydrogels show excellent mechanical and film formation properties. Depending on the ratio of chitosan and starch, properties of hydrogels like mechanical properties and biodegradability varies [168]. Several authors have studied starch-based biodegradable films and chitosan blend with biopolymers [186,187,188,189,190]. Different plasticizers (e.g., glycerol) are also utilized for edible film production [191]. Strength rupture of hydrogel is enhanced with the increase of cellulose amount. On the other hand vapor permeability decrease with the increase of cellulose content in SHs. Derivatives of cellulose like carboxymethylcellulose form thermodynamically compatible hydrogel with starch and exhibit biodegradable property [192]. Nano-cellulose with plasticized starch is cast for SHs composite film production which shows improved mechanical properties. Large changes in mechanical properties like tensile strength are experienced improvement in nanocomposite hydrogel. Tensile strength increases from 11.9 MPa in the unreinforced hydrogel to 498.2 in the nanocomposite hydrogel [193].
Chemical Blend
Covalent bonds are present in the hydrogels which are produced by chemical crosslinking. The equilibrium swelling capacity of these hydrogels depends on the density of crosslinking and water polymer interaction. Different approaches can be utilized for chemical crosslinking such as—(I) polymerization using cross-linkers, (II) polymer–polymer cross-linking, (III) chain-growth polymerization, (IV) addition and condensation polymerization, and (V) gamma and electron beam polymerization etc. [22, 194, 195]. There are some drawbacks to starch–polymer blend hydrogel production. Most of the different polymers are immiscible with starch resulting in unstable physical characteristics of produced hydrogels. For this reason, the chemical crosslinking technique is widely used. A large number of –OH groups are present in the starch structure. Typically, these –OH groups react (substituted with other groups or chains) during the chemical functionalization of the starch molecules [196, 197]. The characteristics of native starch and modified starch are different. But modified starch is biodegradable as well as the parent starch. Chemical crosslinking can be achieved in different ways in SHs.
Graft Copolymerization Method
At the beginning of the graft copolymerization method, reaction between an initiator and polysaccharides (starch) starts. This reaction can proceed in two methods. In the first method, a complex (redox pair) is formed when the hydroxyl group present in the starch monomer reacts with the initiator (e.g., Ce4+). Free radicals are formed on the polymer backbone due to the dissociation of the evolved complex. During the dissociation, C–C bonds experience homogeneous cleavage.
Next, the graft polymerization of vinyl monomers and cross-linker starts on the chain by the produced free radicals. Athawale and Lele [199] prepared SHs by the first method of graft copolymerization of acrylic acid on maize starch in which the initiator was Ce4+. Dragan and Apopei [198] proposed graft polymerization of acrylamide on starch with the same initiator. The mechanism is represented in Fig. 4. By this method properties of the starch can be easily modified and produce SHs [200,201,202].
Another method consists of the formation of free radicals on the polymer backbone by the removal of hydrogen radicals from the –OH groups with S2O82− initiator. This method is more temperature dependent than the first one because a thermal initiator has been used here. Pourjavadi et al. [203] used N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (MBA) as a cross-linker for grafting acrylic acid (AA) on kappa-carrageenan (KC) during the production of the hydrogel. Here ammonium persulfate was used as the initiator. This mechanism is shown in Fig. 5. First of all, sulfate anion-radical is produced by the decomposition of the S2O82− initiator, and hydrogen is removed from –OH groups of KC by this radical to produce alkoxy radical. Then the grafting of acrylic acid started because of the presence of active centers in the persulfate–saccharide redox system. Graft copolymerization can be utilized in natural or synthetic polymers and the combination of both [133, 204, 205].
Direct Crosslinking Method
Polyfunctional compounds like glycerol, glyoxal, or polyvinyl compounds such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polylactic acid (PLA), and divinyl sulphone are generally utilized in the direct crosslinking method of polymerization of hydrogel [130]. As crosslinking agents, glutaraldehyde, citric acid, glyceraldehyde are commonly used [124, 206, 207]. Hydrogel membrane was prepared by Pal et al. [208] by direct crosslinking of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with starch using glutaraldehyde crosslinker. The mechanism is represented in Fig. 6. Acetyl bonds are formed when the glutaraldehyde reacts with the hydroxyl groups present in polyvinyl alcohol [209, 210]. Glutaraldehyde is a reagent which provides multifunctional property. Glutaraldehyde crosslinks starch with PVA by reacting with the hydroxyl groups present in starch. As a result, an intermolecular bridge between PVA and starch chains are formed.
In chemical functionalizing, starches are transformed into anionic polysaccharides [212]. For example, by esterifying starch with maleic anhydride, maleic starch half-ester acid is produced which is an anionic polyelectrolyte [143]. Sangseethong et al. [213] showed the mechanism of crosslinking between starch and citric acid during the preparation of rice starch-based superabsorbent hydrogel. This mechanism of the reaction is based on the anhydride intermediate formation of citric acid [214, 215]. A reactive cyclic anhydride is formed when the citric acid is dehydrated under controlled heating. An ester linkage is formed when the reactive anhydride reacts with starch by the esterification reaction. By this mechanism further crosslinking is achieved.
Radiation Induced Crosslinking Method
To fabricate SHs by chemical crosslinking method, sometimes different types of high energy radiations such as gamma radiation and electron beam irradiation are used [216,217,218,219]. The efficiency of this method is high and further contamination is not occurred [220]. Homolytic scission of C–H bonds of starch is occurred during this process. Hydroxyl radicals are generated from the water molecules due to irradiation. Starch radicals are formed when these hydroxyl radicals remove hydrogen from the starch chain [221, 222]. Final crosslinked network structures are developed by the covalent bonding of starch radicals and different chains. Starch radicals quickly react with oxygen. For this reason, an inert environment is required for crosslinking reaction [62]. Lv et al. [223] grafted acrylamide (AM) and dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride (DMDAAC) onto corn starch using the gamma irradiation method (Fig. 7).
The development of SHs by the process of high energy irradiation has been studied by numerous authors. For instance, Zhai et al. [218] synthesized PVA/starch grafted hydrogel by inducing gamma and electron beam radiation at room temperature. 60Co-gamma radiation-induced graft polymerization method was used by Geresh et al. [224] to develop bioadhesive grafted starch. Acrylic monomers (acrylonitrile, acrylic acid) were used for grafting on multiple kinds of starch (potato, corn, and rice starches). The crosslinking formation was indicated by the insoluble nature of prepared polymer in water and NaOH solution of different pH range.
Abd El-Mohdy et al. [225] synthesized SHs (EG-co-MAA) by the copolymerization of ethylene glycol (EG) with methacrylic acid (MAA) which grafted on starch gamma initiated radiation. It was found that with increasing MAA content, temperature, and pH, swelling of the hydrogel is increased. The nature of crosslinking is affected by starch concentration and radiation. The degree of swelling reduces with increasing starch content and dose of irradiation.
A Combined Strategy
In a recent study, tunable SHs are proposed by Huang and Xiao [226] combining five different techniques—(I) addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization, (II) saponification, (III) esterification, (IV) addition, and (V) click reaction. First, both starch and PVA are utilized to prepare macromonomers. Potassium persulfate was used as an initiator. After that two reaction mechanisms (concurrent electrophilic addition and thiol-ene reactions) are utilized to synthesize SHs. Thiol-ene is a very rapid and efficient reaction mechanism for generating polymer networks [227, 228]. Here toxic H2S is used for SHs preparation (Fig. 8) [226].
From Fig. 8, it is clear that SHs are formed by different reactions among the functional groups. In this regard old traditional techniques, new techniques, or the combining effort can be utilized for the development of crosslinking between the chains for SHs formation.
Comparing to the other chemical methods, the direct cross-linking method, drastic conditions have to be maintained like low pH, high temperature, and addition of quencher [229, 230]. The cross-linking agents used in this method are sometimes toxic (e.g., low concentration of glutaraldehyde is toxic showing cell growth inhibition) [231]. Hence they can’t be directly used in biomedical applications [232, 233]. These hydrogels have good mechanical properties also and the characteristics can be modified by altering the concentration of the dissolved polymer and cross-linking agents. In the radiation-induced cross-linking technique, high energy irradiation (gamma and electron beam) is used for hydrogel production. Free radicals are formed on the polymer chain due to the radiation [234]. Different properties of prepared hydrogels such as the swelling property is dependent on radiation dose and polymer concentration. This process is advantageous than the direct cross-linking method because mild conditions (room temperature and physiological pH) can be used here. On the other hand addition of toxic cross-linkers are not necessary. For this reason, prepared hydrogels can be quickly used in drug delivery systems [131]. The thermal stability of hydrogel is dependent on the types of monomer being used and methods of crosslinking. Literature studies showed that thermal degradation of chemically crosslinked hydrogels starts at 180 °C. For increasing the thermal stability of hydrogels, cross-linking strategy plays a vital role [235,236,237].
Starch-Based Hydrogel Characterization Techniques
To know about various properties of hydrogels such as mechanical, structural, morphological, chemical, and physicochemical properties, characterization of hydrogels are necessary. Different characterization methods are employed according to the application of the hydrogels. There are various established characterization methods are available to study biodegradability, antimicrobial property, water uptake ability, mechanical properties, etc. [238].
Generally, to investigate the characteristics of SHs at micro and nanoscale, microscopic studies are utilized. For instance, the surface morphology of SHs can be examined and compared by using SEM (scanning electron microscope). For instance, Sangseethong et al. [213] synthesized superabsorbent carboxymethyl starch hydrogel using citric acid crosslinker. The internal morphology of native starch and prepared SHs were determined using scanning electron microscope (SEM, Quanta 450, FEI, Oregon, USA). It is found from the SEM image that three-dimensional interconnected porous structures are present in the prepared hydrogel (Fig. 9a, b). Chemical modification by graft copolymerization of the hydrogel surface can be observed from SEM images. In another study, Farag et al. [239] prepared bifunctional hydrogel by grafting AMPS (2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane-1-sulphonic acid) and DMAEMA (dimethyl aminoethyl methacrylate) on starch. Figure 9c shows the SEM image of starch and Fig. 9d shows the SEM of grafted SHs. The difference in the morphology of the SHs surface after the crosslinking can be marked from the SEM images. Homogeneous surface can be seen in the native starch whereas rough surface is observed in the crosslinked hydrogel.
AFM (atomic force microscopy) is an important technique for hydrogel characterization. Quantitative information about the topography of the hydrogel and smooth gel surface with nanometer sized protrusions can be studied with AFM. Information regarding the mechanical and elastic properties of hydrogel can also be studied with AFM [240].
For observing the modification nature of hydrogels and identifying interactions between polymeric chains, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is utilized [241]. Hydroxyl group's presence in a hydrogel can be detected by FTIR analysis. For example, Chin et al. [242] prepared SHs by crosslinking of starch citrate, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and studied the FTIR spectra of native starch (Fig. 10a), starch-citrate (Fig. 10b) and starch-citrate hydrogel (Fig. 10c). From the FTIR spectrum of starch-citrate, peaks at 1724 cm−1 and 1156 cm−1 indicate the ester carbonyl (C=O) group and C–O–C stretching of the ester group respectively. Peaks of 854 cm−1, 917 cm−1 and 1018 cm−1 attributed to C–O–C glycosidic bond in starch, starch-citrate, and hydrogels respectively. OH-stretching peak at 1668 cm−1 in starch was decreased to 1640 cm−1 in the hydrogel. The absorption peak at 3317 cm−1 and 3256 cm−1 indicates the presence of –OH groups in starch-citrate and prepared hydrogel. It is known that the water retention capacity of the hydrogels mainly relies on the availability of free –OH groups [3, 243]. Hence from the FTIR spectrum, the water holding ability of the hydrogel can also be predicted.
The amount of crystallinity in SHs can be determined by XRD [208, 244]. Different characterization techniques such as TGA, DTA, DTG, and DSC are utilized for studying thermal characteristics and stability of hydrogels. The weight loss of the hydrogels with increasing temperature is analyzed by these thermogravimetric methods [245]. One of the significant properties of hydrogels is their mechanical properties which can be measured by tensile strength study [208]. Different types of tensile strength testers are available for this study [5, 246].
Water retention capability is the most important feature of SHs. Swelling behavior can be measure against different solutions such as water, sodium chloride (NaCl), and magnesium chloride (MgCl2) [247]. Generally, cut pieces of the hydrogel are immersed in the solution and kept for 24 h, and swelled hydrogel is weighted. Finally, the swelling ratio can be determined by the following equation [2, 248]:
Here, Ws is the weight of swelled membrane and Wd is the weight of dry membrane.
For evaluating the antimicrobial properties of hydrogels, anti-bacterial activity measurement is important. Disk diffusion technique is a popular method for antimicrobial test of starch-based hydrogels [243, 249]. Different types of gram-negative (e.g., Escherichia coli) and gram-positive (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria are used in this method. From the zone of inhibition in the agar plate, antibacterial activity can be evaluated [250, 251].
Biocompatibility is an important property of starch-based hydrogels. Hence hydrogels need to undergo biodegradability test. Two highly used degradation tests are—(I) direct microbial studies, and (II) soil burial test. Hydrogel is buried in soil for a period of time. Then the sample is washed and weighted. Weight loss percentage is the result of degradation. The direct microbial study is a similar process to the soil burial test. Additionally, cultured microorganisms are used here for the degradation of SHs [252, 253].
Applications of Starch-Based Hydrogel
The popularity of SHs is increasing day by day because of their characteristics such as biodegradability and dynamic mechanical properties. SHs have different applications in biomedical sectors (e.g., drug delivery system, contact lenses), agricultural sectors (e.g., controlled pesticide release, water storage), food industries (e.g., food packaging), and so on. SHs have various industrial applications. In the cosmetic industry, electrophoresis, and food industries, SHs are widely used [22, 254, 255]. Different applications of SHs are represented in Fig. 11.
Biomedical Applications
In the biomedical sectors, the use of SHs have several advantages due to having some unique properties like the biological systems [256,257,258,259,260,261,262] which are—(I) biocompatible nature, (II) higher biodegradability, (III) good mechanical characteristics, (IV) hydrophobic property, (V) permeability and so on. For giving the patients quick structural support nowadays bone cement is utilized which is starch-based and gradually degrade from the placement site. In addition, different bio-active materials are used with starch-based bone cement resulting in the growth of bone at the cement–bone interface and unnecessary portion degrade naturally [263]. Along with water absorbing capacity SHs show good mechanical properties which enhances their applicability in biomedical sectors. Hassan et al. [2] developed PVA/starch-based antibacterial hydrogel membrane for wound dressing. For the first time, they used turmeric as an antimicrobial agent in SHs. Batool et al. [243] synthesized starch-based antimicrobial nanocomposite hydrogels for wound dressing by incorporating Ag nanoparticles. Artificial skin had been fabricated from corn starch-based hydrogels by Pal et al. [264].
Tissue Engineering
SHs are soft and flexible like living tissues and can retain a huge amount of water. For this reason, in tissue engineering, the use of SHs are becoming popular [265]. Starch-based scaffolds are an excellent innovation in tissue engineering. They represent similar characteristics to the body matrix of the human tissue which are mainly different amino acids and sugar-based macromolecules. SHs can mimic the properties of body matrices being completely biocompatible [266]. The ability of starch to create pores in ceramics and membranes can be utilized in scaffold bone tissue engineering [77, 267, 268].
Several types of SHs such as chitosan-starch hydrogels are utilized in tissue engineering applications [59, 265]. Salgado et al. [269] synthesized novel scaffolds based on starch particularly for bone tissue engineering. Prepared scaffolds are completely nontoxic, have good mechanical properties (compressive modulus and compressive strengths are 117.50 ± 3.7 MPa and 20.8 ± 2.4 respectively), don’t inhibit cell growth, and increase the growth of human osteoblast like cells. Kamoun [270] prepared SHs based on dialdehyde starch (DAS) and N-succinyl chitosan (SCS) without using any traditional chemical crosslinking agents. The synthesized hydrogel is injectable, non-toxic, biodegradable, biocompatible, and showed good mechanical properties. The use of prepared hydrogel in tissue engineering and cartilage repairing is proposed.
Another important characteristic of starch-based materials is their different configurations. Available configurations of starch-based materials are fibers, films, and beads etc. [271,272,273,274]. Different authors have used several techniques to prepare starch-based scaffolds such as—(I) Fiber bonding method [275,276,277], (II) Particulate leaching methods [275, 278], (III) Phase separation method [279,280,281], (IV) Microwave backing method, etc. [282]. But utilization of SHs in tissue engineering is studied by few authors. For instance, Gomes et al. [278] prepared starch-based polymeric scaffolds and studied their configurations, mechanical properties, morphology, and degradation behavior. Tunable SHs were fabricated by Noè et al. [283] from maize starch by photocuring process. The prepared SHs were light processable and showed good mechanical properties along with biocompatibility. As the hydrogel showed good human cell viability it can be utilized in human tissue engineering and cell carriers. Thermosensitive SHs have been prepared by blending starch and chitosan by Viyoch and colleagues [284]. They have potential applications in cartilage tissue engineering and chondrocyte delivery through injection. The pore size and hydrophobicity of the fabricated hydrogel are enhanced because of using starch which is more advantageous for tissue engineering [285].
Drug Delivery Systems
The use of SHs in drug delivery devices is one of the successful biomedical applications of SHs and they are already used at the industrial level. Delivering the site-specific drug in the body with the highest efficiency and minimal side-effects are the main purpose of creating a drug carrier system. Different hydrogels based on polysaccharides (e.g., dextran, chitosan, pectin) is used for site-specific drug carrier of the colon [286,287,288]. These types of site-specific drugs show higher efficiency because the drug molecules are out of contact with other tissues and organs of the body [289]. SHs possess some unique and modifiable physical characteristics which are very much useful for using them in the drug delivery system. The surface of SHs are porous resulting in great affinity for liquid environment and swollen. The porosity of SHs is controllable by altering the density of crosslinking. Porosity is an important property because it assists in the quick and easy loading of drug molecules into hydrogels and helps in releasing the drug in a specific area [148]. Some studies on SHs in drug delivery systems showed very good results. For instance, Ketoprofen drug loaded SHs based on starch-methacrylic acid (MAAc) copolymer was prepared by Ali et al. [288]. The study showed very good results in retaining the drug at a very low pH (pH 1) and released the loaded drug at pH 7. Prepared drug loaded SHs showed excellent pH sensitivity and they can also be utilized in the site-specific drug of the colon. For the treatment of colon disease like Crohn’s disease, SHs prepared from starch (starch-M hydrogel) with GMA (Glycidyl methacrylate) was studied by Reis et al. [290]. This SH showed excellent behavior in preserving and transporting corticoids which is an acid-responsive drug. For controlled released drug delivery system, xanthan gum hydrogels can be a good alternative because it shows selective permeability on ionizable drug loading. Shalviri et al. [291] studied SH (starch–xanthan gum hydrogels) for drug delivery system. Their study suggests that prepared novel SHs can be used in drug delivery systems for different types of drugs because of their selective permeability property.
Agricultural Applications
Agriculture is one of the most important industries. Good agriculture mostly relies on an adequate quantity of water and nutrients (enhanced by fertilizers). Plants can absorb about 30–60% of the N2 from fertilizers and the rest is leached into groundwater and river water causing extreme environmental pollutions [292,293,294,295]. For reducing this problem controlled-release fertilizers can be a good choice in which fertilizers will be released slowly preventing the loss of the valuable amount of fertilizers [296, 297]. Currently, scarcity of water is a global issue. An enormous amount of water is needed for irrigation. In summer seasons, a shortage of water is seen and in some desert areas, rainfall is not available. In this regard, hydrogels with high water absorbing capacity can be used. Hydrogels can retain water for extended periods and release water slowly. Hence hydrogel-based agriculture can be widely used [298]. Advantages of using hydrogels in farmlands are many, such as—(I) less amount of water is required for irrigation, (II) fertilizer is retained in the soil for a longer period, (III) decrease plant death, (IV) enhance plant growth, and (V) decrease environment pollution [299].
SHs can be utilized in this sector for water storage and fertilizer retention [22]. Starch-based polymers are utilized not only in water and fertilizer storage but also in the greenhouse hood and mulch film [300]. SHs can prevent the fertilizers from early leaching and surface runoff [292, 299, 301, 302]. It is found that the use of starch-based superabsorbent hydrogels enhances bacterial growth in the farmland. By utilizing this property, weedy plants and harmful microorganisms can be controlled from the land. Hence controlled pesticide formulations are another use of SHs in agriculture [83]. Along with water and fertilizers, proper use of pesticides is also important for increased production of foods and preventing environmental problems [303, 304]. Hence controlled released pesticides are required to reduce environmental leaching and dermal toxicity [305,306,307]. For example, SHs were prepared by Singh et al. [308] for the controlled release of thiram fungicide. The SH was prepared from starch and poly (methacrylic acid) adding initiator (ammonium persulphate) and crosslinker (N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide). It showed a very good result in controlled thiram release [309]. Starch–alginate beads (adsorbents—bentonite and kaolin) were used for controlling the release of thiram by Singh et al. [310].
For the slow release of thiophanate methyl, fluometuron, and trifluralin, Abd El-Mohdy et al. [311] prepared starch/(EG-co-MAA) hydrogels. SH with the copolymers acrylic acid and acrylamide was used as the membrane of urea by Liu et al. [299] for slow release purposes. The observation result showed that 61% N2 was released on the 13th day from the hydrogel and its water intake capacity was 80%. Fang et al. [312] used the graft copolymerization technique to prepare SHs. Acrylamide and acrylic acid was grafted onto starch and ethylene glycol was the crosslinker. These SHs were used to observe the corn seed germination. Germination energy was comparatively higher than normal germination when SHs were used.
Food Industry
The use of starch-based biodegradable polymers for the packaging of food is getting attention nowadays. The use of petroleum-based plastic can be minimized by using natural biodegradable polymers [313]. In the food industry, starch-based biopolymers are primarily used for food packaging [314]. For using starch-based polymers in food packaging some requirements should be maintained such as—(I) packaging materials should be cheap, (II) protection from chemical, biological, and physical influences, and (III) keep the food fresh [315]. Traditionally food packaging made from LDPE (low-density polyethylene) is not ecofriendly and takes a long time to be disposed of [316]. Starch-based biodegradable polymers can be a good alternative to this packaging material [188]. The main limitation in this respect is the retrogradation of starch in presence of water. To overcome this issue, thermoplastic starch can be prepared by adding different types of plasticizers [315]. Different methods like thermo-processing or casting techniques can be used for fabricating starch films [317,318,319]. Avella et al. [320] prepared starch/clay nanocomposite-based biodegradable packaging materials for food. Good mechanical properties (modulus and tensile strength) had been shown by the packaging. Different forms of starch like modified, soluble, or pre-gelatinized starch are used to prepare starch films [321, 322]. Some advantages of using starch film are—these films are non-toxic, biodegradable, odorless, transparent, and low oxygen permeability at less humidity [323, 324]. Furthermore, foamed materials can be prepared from starch which can be the replacement of polystyrene foam [325]. For food packaging, chitosan-starch based hydrogels can be used [326]. Jyothi et al. [327] crosslinked (cassava starch with epichlorohydrin) polymer for food packaging with enhanced physicochemical, thermal, and retrogradation properties. Food packaging film coated by starch-graft-acrylic acid was prepared by Tsuji et al. [17]. For controlling humidity (for fruits and vegetable preservation), CO2 and O2 concentration urethane was used as binder. Hence, in the food packaging industry, the starch-based biodegradable polymers can bring revolutionary change by implementing eco-friendly packaging.
Electrical Applications
Nowadays superabsorbent hydrogels are used in numerous kinds of electrical sectors such as in electronic water-resistant cable coatings, corrosion-resistant coatings etc. SHs are utilized in telecommunication cable production. When the outer layer of the electric cables are damaged, water enters the inner side and damages the cable. Cables can be protected from unwanted water by using hydrogels in the cable. They can also be utilized in the water blocking tape for electronics by dispersing on the fabric [328].
Water resisting cable was prepared by Schoeck et al. [329]. For enhancing the water blocking capacity of the cables, starch-based super absorbent hydrogels coated filaments were utilized. Starch grafted sodium polyacrylates, and partial sodium salts of polypropenoic acid were used in the filament. Alcohol soluble yarn binders were used to attach the hydrogel to the surface [17, 328, 330].
Starch/graphene hydrogels were prepared by González et al. [331] by Diels–Alder cross-linking reactions between starch (furan modified) and bismaleimide (BMI) compound. It was hypothesized that enhanced antimicrobial and electrical properties could be represented by the prepared SHs. Electrically conductive SHs (polyaniline impregnated polyacrylate-starch hydrogel) were prepared by Prabhakar and Kumar [332] and conductivity was studied with a varying crosslinker, initiator, and monomer concentration.
Personal Hygiene Applications
Superabsorbents are mainly used in diapers, sanitary napkins, adult incontinence products, feminine hygiene products as an absorbent for water. These personal care products are very important for keeping individuals dry and hygienic especially during the period time [333,334,335]. It has taken the place of cloth, cotton, cellulose fiber etc. which were traditionally used as absorbent. Because they have limitations like low water absorption capacity, recyclability [336]. There are mainly two parts in diapers—core and chassis. Superabsorbent polymers are mainly used in the core part to absorb body fluids [337]. Hydrogels can absorb huge amounts of body wastes, fluids, and retain them under pressure. All these features have made hydrogels one of the most suitable materials for using in personal hygiene products. By reviewing the literature, it is seen that lots of studies have been done on the cellulose based superabsorbent hydrogel and its use in hygiene applications [338,339,340,341,342,343,344]. But a few works have been found on starch-based superabsorbent polymers used on this site. A starch-based film was prepared by Weisman et al. [17] from starch-graft-acrylic acid. This film could be used for the storage of fluid in diapers. Nowadays cellulose and acrylic-based hydrogels have got huge attention. Hence further research on the use of SHs in this sector should be continued.
Water Treatment
Water pollution by heavy metals (Ni, Pb, Cd, Ag, Hg) is one of the main environmental issues all over the world. If the number of heavy metals in water crosses the permissible limit then it may cause serious environmental and human health issues [345,346,347,348,349,350]. Traditionally different types of water recycling methods (ion exchange, solvent extraction, and precipitation) are used for the purification of water from heavy metals. But these methods are expensive and a large quantity of solid wastes are produced [17]. Using different adsorbents for heavy metal ion removal from water is a very effective method. Nowadays activated carbon is highly used for the heavy metals (Cd, Ni, Cr, Cu) [351,352,353,354] removal from aqueous media [355, 356]. Although it has several advantages (adsorption capacity is higher, large surface area), it is not a very cost-effective approach for water recycling. Hydrogels prepared from polysaccharides can be a great alternative for high-cost adsorbents for water recycling because they are inexpensive and non-toxic [357, 358]. Several authors have studied the use of inexpensive adsorbents like starch biopolymers and SHs to extract toxic heavy metals from wastewater [359,360,361,362,363].
Cassava starch-based hydrogels were prepared by Ekebafe et al. [362] by grafting acrylonitrile onto native cassava starch. Ceric ammonium ion was used as an initiator. Under equilibrium conditions, sorption mechanisms were studied for Ni2+, Cu2+, Pb2+. The sorption data were a good fit for the Freundlich model represented the sorption capacity for grafted hydrogel: 72 mg Pb/g, 76.6 mg Cu/g, and 86.5 mg Ni/g. With increased hydrolysis, heavy metal affinity also increased.
Abdel-Aal et al. [364] synthesized maize starch/acrylic acid hydrogels by radiation-induced graft copolymerization technique to remove heavy metal ions such as Fe3+, Cr3+, Pb2+, and Cd2+ from wastewater. The sequence of metal uptake capacity for the hydrogel was Fe3+ > Cr3+ > Pb2+ > Cd2+ which increases with increased pH.
For the effective removal of Cu2+ ions from the wastewater, Dai et al. [365] prepared thermoresponsive composite SHs. The novel SH was synthesized from sodium alginate and 2-hydroxy-3-isopropoxypropyl starch and its response to the pH was investigated. It was observed that inside the hydrogel structure there are sufficient Cu2+ ions binding sites. The maximum adsorption capacity for Cu2+ was 25.81 mg/g.
Chauhan et al. [366] synthesized functional SHs (polycarboxylated) by the free radical initiation technique for sorption of Cu2+ ions where N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide was used as crosslinker. At pH 7, maximum adsorption capacity for the ions was investigated 128.26 mg/g−1 (2 h at 40 °C). From the FTIR data it was seen that ions were adsorbed by chelation mechanism between the –CO2 and –C=O or –OH groups of the hydrogel with Cu2+ ions.
Yu et al. [367] proposed starch/PVA hydrogels crosslinking with Laponite RD (LRD) by freezing/thawing technique for cadmium ion absorption. It was investigated that with raising LRD concentration, Cd2+ ion absorption was increased.
For the efficient sorption (exothermic and spontaneous) of Fe2+ ions from the solution, a range of hydrogels were prepared. As initiator accelerator ammonium persulphate (APS) and N,N,N,N-tetramethyl ethylene diamine (TEMED) were utilized. The investigation showed that metals ion adsorption capacity is strongly relied on the environment (temperature and pH). It was clear from the characterization techniques that metal ions intake capability of N,N′- methylene-bis-acrylamide crosslinked hydrogels were less than the hydrogels crosslinked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate [368].
Dye Sorption
Water pollution is a dangerous environmental issue [369]. Different industrial effluents carry a variety of toxic chemicals, dyes, and heavy metals. Plastic, leather, paint, textile, paper, and cosmetic industries use toxic dyes to color their products and release a huge amount of toxic dyes in rivers and groundwater without appropriate treatments [370, 371]. Textile dying industries are the major contributor to this dye pollutions [372, 373]. The World Bank reported that 17% to 20% of the polluted water comes from the dyeing and finishing sectors of the textile industries [374,375,376]. These water containing colorants and dyes are very harmful to the ecosystem and public health [377,378,379,380,381,382,383]. Different types of methods have been utilized to remove industrial dyes from wastewater such as—adsorption, anaerobic degradation, coagulation, flotation, biological treatment, chemical treatment, and so on [384, 385]. Among these methods adsorption method is becoming popular day by day because of its high efficiency, low cost, and easy handling [386,387,388,389]. The sorption process is subjected to different factors like pH, temperature, the surface area of solvent, bonding between the dye, sorbent, and particle size, etc. [17, 385].
To remove dyes from wastewater different types of adsorbent materials are utilized such as—different types of clays [390], synthetic hydrogels [391,392,393], and biopolymers [394,395,396]. Different adsorbents based on natural polysaccharides (chitosan, starch-based hydrogels) have got much attention these days [53, 364, 397,398,399].
Mahmoud et al. [400] prepared starch, acrylic acid, and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) based hydrogels by gamma radiation for the adsorption of acid-fast red dye from industrial wastewater. With increased gamma irradiation gel content of the prepared hydrogel also increased. The effect of temperature, pH, and concentration of the dye medium during adsorption was also investigated. With the decrease of pH, the adsorption capacity of the hydrogels increased whereas capacity decreased with lower initial dye concentration and temperature.
IIgin et al. [401] proposed the preparation of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) based hydrogels, hydroxyethyl starch/p(sodium acrylate), hydroxyethyl starch/p(3 (acrylamidopropyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride), and hydroxyethyl starch/p(acrylamide) to adsorb cationic dyes [e.g., methyl violet (MV) and methyl orange (MO) from water]. The hydrogels were prepared by redox polymerization technique. The result showed that the organic dye adsorption efficiency of the hydrogels was over 90% (maximum adsorption of MO and MV was 238.1 mg/g and 185.2 mg/g).
Starch/poly(alginic acid-g-acrylamide) nano-hydrogel (ST/PL(AA-g-AAm) NHG) was synthesized by Sharma et al. [402] by copolymerization technique. The prepared hydrogels were utilized for the adsorption of Coomassie brilliant (CB) blue R-250 dye from wastewater. The adsorption isotherm was investigated from the regression coefficient value of Langmuir (0.99), Freundlich (0.93), and Tempkin (0.98) isotherm which shows that Langmuir isotherm fits the adsorption process. The dependency of adsorption on temperature, time, pH, and dye concentration was also studied in detail.
For the removal of different dyes such as anionic dyes [direct brown 2 (D. Brown 2), direct blue 21 (D. Blue 21)], and a cationic dye (methylene blue), Hashem et al. [403] prepared bi-functional starch composite hydrogels by grafting acrylic acid (AA) and acrylamide (AAm) onto maize starch. Gamma irradiation induced grafting mechanism was utilized for the hydrogel preparation. The adsorption of D. Brown 2 and D. Blue 21 onto a prepared composite followed the Freundlich isotherm.
Different studies had been done on dye adsorption by SHs such as—Dragan et al. [198] synthesized semi-IPN composite hydrogels from potato starch for the adsorption of Methylene Blue dye. Bhattacharyya et al. [388] prepared SHs based on acrylamide, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, and starch for effective removal of low (2.5–40) and high concentration (200–500 mg/L) cationic dyes from aqueous solution. Superabsorbent chitosan-starch (ChS) hydrogels were prepared by Ngwabebhoh et al. [371] for the adsorption of Direct Red 80 (DR80) from water. Moharrami and Motamedi (2020) synthesized starch-based hydrogel nanocomposites from agricultural waste for the adsorption of two cationic dyes—crystal violet (CV) and methylene blue (MB). Malachite green and methyl violet are two widely used dyes in industries for being cheap and easily available [404, 405]. Al-Aidy and Amdeha [406] proposed the preparation of polyacrylic acid and acrylamide grafted starch hydrogels for the enhanced adsorption of malachite green dye from water.
Miscellaneous Applications
The use of SHs are gaining huge attention in numerous areas and industrial sectors such as petroleum industries, paper industries, plastic and ion exchange resin manufacturing, and so on [407, 408]. The use of SHs for making biodegradable plastic film can be a good alternative to synthetic polymers. Thermoplastics can be fabricated by grafting starch with acrylate esters, methacrylate esters, and styrene. Starch-g-poly(methyl methacrylate-co-acrylonitrile) polymers can be highly used in making bio-plastics because of their good toughness. The starch grafted copolymers are easily attacked by soil microorganisms and degrade rapidly [409, 410]. Biodegradable polyethylene was developed by Maharana and Singh [411] by graft copolymerization of starch.
For reducing the filtrate loss in the oilfield drilling muds, starch graft copolymers are frequently used. Acrylamide and vinyl alcohol monomers grafted on starch are utilized in drilling mud [412,413,414]. Song et al. [415] prepared copolymer of starch with acrylamide (AM) and 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfoacid (AMPS) by grafting mechanism and used the copolymer as flooding agent in oil recovery. The study showed that with a higher grafting level oil recovery rate also increased. Acrylonitrile-graft-starch and quick lime particles were utilized by Kobayashi et al. [416] for the development of demolition agents for demolishing the rigid structures. SHs are potentially used in other sectors such as sizing agent of textiles (e.g., starch-g-poly(vinyl acetate-sizing agent of cotton)) [417], dye thickening agents etc.[418].
Research Gaps and Future Aspects
Research on starch-based hydrogel is flourishing due to its distinctive characteristics and potential applications. Synthesis methods of SHs are developing. The combination of both physical and chemical cross-linking is getting much attention. Different studies have been conducted on starch-based smart hydrogels such as responsive hydrogels (e.g., pH sensitive and stimuli responsive SHs) [198, 237, 419,420,421], dual and multi-responsive SHs [422, 423], hybrid nanothermochromic SHs [424], starch-based tunable hydrogels [425], magnetic SHs [426], clickable SHs for 3d encapsulation [427] etc. Further studies and investigations are necessary for developing hydrogels with smart properties. In this regard nanostructured, hybrid and bioinspired SHs can be the field of further interest. Hydrogel’s characteristics depend heavily on its method of preparation, composition, and structure. So, various kinds of starch-based hydrogels with numerous unique properties can be developed by closely customizing the structure of the macromolecules based on starch. Sometimes the properties of native starch-based hydrogels are not as good as synthetic polymers such as having poor mechanical properties. Hence different types of synthetic polymers (e.g., PVA, PLA) are utilized for the modification of starch hydrogel properties. To catch the commercial fields, the performance (e.g., mechanical properties, antimicrobial properties, swelling behavior) of starch-based hydrogels need to be improved. Although different studies are going on for applying SHs in biomedical and other fields, commercialization of these products are not satisfactory. For the development of more commercial products with more advanced and unique properties, further research on SHs should be continued.
Conclusion
There are many beneficial properties of starch-based hydrogels. They are hydrophilic, biodegradable, biocompatible, pH-responsive, and non-toxic in nature. In addition, they are cheap and their high accessibility from natural sources makes them more appealing, intelligent polymer materials. Due to their environment-friendly nature, starch-based sustainable hydrogels can be the alternative to petroleum-based polymeric materials. People will be no longer highly reliable on synthetic polymers. Preparation and characterization methods of SHs are comparatively easier. Although, SHs have some drawbacks such as lower sustainability and poor mechanical properties, promising application opportunities of SHs are widening day by day. They are occupying the place of synthetic hydrogels in the field of agriculture, biomedical (e.g., tissue engineering, drug delivery), water recycling, and food industries. More studies on starch-based sustainable hydrogels are required. In this review, a brief summarization of preparation methods, characterization techniques, and several potential applications of SHs are given. This review might be helpful for the researchers studying in this field.
Abbreviations
- SHs:
-
Starch based hydrogels
- PLA:
-
Poly lactic acid
- PGA:
-
Poly glycolic acid
- AA:
-
Acrylic acid
- KC:
-
Kappa-carrageenan
- PVA:
-
Polyvinyl alcohol
- AM:
-
Acrylamide
- MBA:
-
N,N′-Methylenebisacrylamide
- DMDAAC:
-
Dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride
- EG:
-
Ethylene glycol
- MAA:
-
Methacrylic acid
- PCL:
-
Polycaprolactone
- AMPS:
-
2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane-1-sulphonic acid
- DMAEMA:
-
Dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate
- AFM:
-
Atomic force microscopy
- FTIR:
-
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- XRD:
-
X-ray diffraction
- TGA:
-
Thermogravimetric analysis
- DTA:
-
Differential thermal analysis
- DTG:
-
Differential thermogravimetry
- DSC:
-
Differential scanning calorimetry
- GMA:
-
Glycidyl methacrylate
- LDPE:
-
Low-density polyethylene
- APS:
-
Ammonium persulphate
- TEMED:
-
N,N,N,N-Tetramethylethylene diamine
- LRD:
-
Laponite RD
- HEMA:
-
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate
- HES:
-
Hydroxyethyl starch
- CB:
-
Coomassie brilliant
- MB:
-
Methylene blue
- MV:
-
Methyl violet
- MO:
-
Methyl orange
- AMPS:
-
2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfoacid
References
Kabiri K, Omidian H, Zohuriaan-Mehr M, Doroudiani S (2011) Superabsorbent hydrogel composites and nanocomposites: a review. Polym Compos 32(2):277–289
Hassan A, Niazi MBK, Hussain A, Farrukh S, Ahmad T (2018) Development of anti-bacterial PVA/starch based hydrogel membrane for wound dressing. J Polym Environ 26(1):235–243
Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–23
Ullah F, Othman MBH, Javed F, Ahmad Z, Akil HM (2015) Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 57:414–433
Jiang S, Liu S, Feng W (2011) PVA hydrogel properties for biomedical application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(7):1228–1233
Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ (2008) Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng B 14(2):149–165
Ferris CJ, Gilmore KJ, Wallace GG (2013) Modified gellan gum hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Soft Matter 9(14):3705–3711
Qiu Y, Park K (2001) Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53(3):321–339
Kurisawa M, Chung JE, Yang YY, Gao SJ, Uyama H (2005) Injectable biodegradable hydrogels composed of hyaluronic acid–tyramine conjugates for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Chem Commun 34:4312–4314
Sikareepaisan P, Ruktanonchai U, Supaphol P (2011) Preparation and characterization of asiaticoside-loaded alginate films and their potential for use as effectual wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym 83(4):1457–1469
Ribeiro MP, Espiga A, Silva D, Baptista P, Henriques J, Ferreira C, Silva JC, Borges JP, Pires E, Chaves P (2009) Development of a new chitosan hydrogel for wound dressing. Wound Repair Regen 17(6):817–824
Chen Y, Chen L, Bai H, Li L (2013) Graphene oxide–chitosan composite hydrogels as broad-spectrum adsorbents for water purification. J Mater Chem A 1(6):1992–2001
Gao H, Sun Y, Zhou J, Xu R, Duan H (2013) Mussel-inspired synthesis of polydopamine-functionalized graphene hydrogel as reusable adsorbents for water purification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(2):425–432
Thombare N, Jha U, Mishra S, Siddiqui M (2017) Borax cross-linked guar gum hydrogels as potential adsorbents for water purification. Carbohydr Polym 168:274–281
Kaihara S, Matsumura S, Fisher JP (2008) Synthesis and characterization of cyclic acetal based degradable hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 68(1):67–73
Stamatialis DF, Papenburg BJ, Girones M, Saiful S, Bettahalli SN, Schmitmeier S, Wessling M (2008) Medical applications of membranes: drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering. J Membr Sci 308(1–2):1–34
Ismail H, Irani M, Ahmad Z (2013) Starch-based hydrogels: present status and applications. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 62(7):411–420
Ho G-H, Yang T-H, Yang J (2006) Moisturizers comprising one or more of gamma-polyglutamic acid (gamma-PGA, H form), gamma-polyglutamates and gamma-polyglutamate hydrogels for use in cosmetic or personal care products. Google Patents
Peng MC, Sethu V, Selvarajoo A (2020) Performance study of chia seeds, chia flour and Mimosa pudica hydrogel as polysaccharide-based superabsorbent polymers for sanitary napkins. Materials Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101712
Saxena AK (2010) Synthetic biodegradable hydrogel (PleuraSeal) sealant for sealing of lung tissue after thoracoscopic resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(2):496–497
Junior CR, De Moura MR, Aouada FA (2017) Synthesis and characterization of intercalated nanocomposites based on poly (methacrylic acid) hydrogel and nanoclay cloisite-Na+ for possible application in agriculture. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 17(8):5878–5883
Bhatia JK, Kaith BS, Kalia S (2013) Polysaccharide hydrogels: synthesis, characterization, and applications. In: Polysaccharide based graft copolymers. Springer, Berlin, pp 271–290
Elvira C, Mano J, San Roman J, Reis R (2002) Starch-based biodegradable hydrogels with potential biomedical applications as drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 23(9):1955–1966
Buchholz FL, Graham AT (1998) Modern superabsorbent polymer technology. Wiley, New York, p 279
Brannon-Peppas L, Harland RS (2012) Absorbent polymer technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Li Y, Huang G, Zhang X, Li B, Chen Y, Lu T, Lu TJ, Xu F (2013) Magnetic hydrogels and their potential biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater 23(6):660–672
Dergunov SA, Mun GA (2009) γ-Irradiated chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogels as pH-sensitive protein delivery system. Radiat Phys Chem 78(1):65–68
Ganji F, Vasheghani FS, Vasheghani FE (2010) Theoretical description of hydrogel swelling: a review. Iran Polym J (Engl) 19:375–398
Xu X, Bai B, Ding C, Wang H, Suo Y (2015) Synthesis and properties of an ecofriendly superabsorbent composite by grafting the poly (acrylic acid) onto the surface of dopamine-coated sea buckthorn branches. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(13):3268–3278
Lu D, Xiao C, Xu S (2009) Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polym Lett 3(6):366–375
Riyajan S-A, Sasithornsonti Y, Phinyocheep P (2012) Green natural rubber-g-modified starch for controlling urea release. Carbohydr Polym 89(1):251–258
Zou W, Yu L, Liu X, Chen L, Zhang X, Qiao D, Zhang R (2012) Effects of amylose/amylopectin ratio on starch-based superabsorbent polymers. Carbohydr Polym 87(2):1583–1588
Hu X, Gao C (2008) Photoinitiating polymerization to prepare biocompatible chitosan hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci 110(2):1059–1067
Popa EG, Carvalho PP, Dias AF, Santos TC, Santo VE, Marques AP, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Gomes ME, Reis RL (2014) Evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of carrageenan-based hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(11):4087–4097
Liu J, Li Q, Su Y, Yue Q, Gao B (2014) Characterization and swelling–deswelling properties of wheat straw cellulose based semi-IPNs hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 107:232–240
Kato Y, Matsuo R, Isogai A (2003) Oxidation process of water-soluble starch in TEMPO-mediated system. Carbohydr Polym 51(1):69–75
Aouada FA, Moura MRd, Lopes da Silva WT, Muniz EC, Mattoso LHC (2011) Preparation and characterization of hydrophilic, spectroscopic, and kinetic properties of hydrogels based on polyacrylamide and methylcellulose polysaccharide. J Appl Polym Sci 120(5):3004–3013
Teramoto N, Motoyama T, Yosomiya R, Shibata M (2003) Synthesis, thermal properties, and biodegradability of propyl-etherified starch. Eur Polym J 39(2):255–261
Pfister B, Zeeman SC (2016) Formation of starch in plant cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 73(14):2781–2807
Kittipongpatana OS, Sirithunyalug J, Laenger R (2006) Preparation and physicochemical properties of sodium carboxymethyl mungbean starches. Carbohydr Polym 63(1):105–112
Araújo MA, Cunha AM, Mota M (2004) Enzymatic degradation of starch-based thermoplastic compounds used in protheses: identification of the degradation products in solution. Biomaterials 25(13):2687–2693
Zhang J-F, Sun X (2004) Mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid)/starch composites compatibilized by maleic anhydride. Biomacromolecules 5(4):1446–1451
Garcı́a-Alonso A, Jiménez-Escrig A, Martı́n-Carrón N, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F, (1999) Assessment of some parameters involved in the gelatinization and retrogradation of starch. Food Chem 66(2):181–187
Morrison WR, Karkalas J (1990) Starch. In: Methods in plant biochemistry, vol 2. Elsevier, London, pp 323–352
White RJ, Budarin VL, Clark JH (2008) Tuneable mesoporous materials from α-d-polysaccharides. ChemSusChem Chem Sustain Energy Mater 1(5):408–411
García-González C, Alnaief M, Smirnova I (2011) Polysaccharide-based aerogels—promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym 86(4):1425–1438
Griffin G (1994) Starch polymer blends. Polym Degrad Stab 45(2):241–247
Pareta R, Edirisinghe M (2006) A novel method for the preparation of starch films and coatings. Carbohydr Polym 63(3):425–431
Park JS, Yang JH, Kim DH, Lee DH (2004) Degradability of expanded starch/PVA blends prepared using calcium carbonate as the expanding inhibitor. J Appl Polym Sci 93(2):911–919
Schwach E, Averous L (2004) Starch-based biodegradable blends: morphology and interface properties. Polym Int 53(12):2115–2124
Stepto R (2006) Understanding the processing of thermoplastic starch. In: Macromolecular symposia, 2006, vol 1. Wiley Online Library, USA, pp 571–577
Mohamed NA, Fahmy MM (2012) Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some novel cross-linked chitosan hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci 1(9):11194–11209
Crini G (2005) Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci 30(1):38–70
Bikiaris D, Prinos J, Koutsopoulos K, Vouroutzis N, Pavlidou E, Frangis N, Panayiotou C (1998) LDPE/plasticized starch blends containing PE-g-MA copolymer as compatibilizer. Polym Degrad Stab 59(1–3):287–291
Liu LS, Kost J, Yan F, Spiro RC (2012) Hydrogels from biopolymer hybrid for biomedical, food, and functional food applications. Polymers 4(2):997–1011
Zhu K, Xiangzhou L, Shilin Y (1990) Preparation, characterization, and properties of polylactide (PLA)–poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) copolymers: a potential drug carrier. J Appl Polym Sci 39(1):1–9
Youxin L, Kissel T (1993) Synthesis and properties of biodegradable ABA triblock copolymers consisting of poly (l-lactic acid) or poly (l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) A-blocks attached to central poly (oxyethylene) B-blocks. J Control Release 27(3):247–257
Heller J, Pangburn S, Roskos K (1990) Development of enzymatically degradable protective coatings for use in triggered drug delivery systems: derivatized starch hydrogels. Biomaterials 11(5):345–350
Pereira C, Cunha A, Reis R, Vazquez B, San Roman J (1998) New starch-based thermoplastic hydrogels for use as bone cements or drug-delivery carriers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 9(12):825–833
Whistler RL, Daniel JR (2000) Starch. In: Kirk–Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.1920011823080919.a01
Robyt JF (2008) Starch: Structure, properties, chemistry, and enzymology. Glycoscience. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30429-6_35
Zhang L-M, Yang C, Yan L (2005) Perspectives on: strategies to fabricate starch-based hydrogels with potential biomedical applications. J Bioact Compat Polym 20(3):297–314
Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X (2004) Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 39(2):151–165
Nasri-Nasrabadi B, Mehrasa M, Rafienia M, Bonakdar S, Behzad T, Gavanji S (2014) Porous starch/cellulose nanofibers composite prepared by salt leaching technique for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 108:232–238
French D (1972) Fine structure of starch and its relationship to the organization of starch granules. J Jpn Soc Starch Sci 19(1):8–25
Mua J, Jackson D (1997) Fine structure of corn amylose and amylopectin fractions with various molecular weights. J Agric Food Chem 45(10):3840–3847
Buleon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S (1998) Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 23(2):85–112
Biliaderis C (1998) Structures and phase transitions of starch polymers. ChemInform 29(47):57–168
Ellis RP, Cochrane MP, Dale MFB, Duffus CM, Lynn A, Morrison IM, Prentice RDM, Swanston JS, Tiller SA (1998) Starch production and industrial use. J Sci Food Agric 77(3):289–311
Domene-López D, García-Quesada JC, Martin-Gullon I, Montalbán MG (2019) Influence of starch composition and molecular weight on physicochemical properties of biodegradable films. Polymers 11(7):1084
Sajilata MG, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR (2006) Resistant starch—a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 5(1):1–17
Wallace RA, Sanders GP, Ferl RJ (1996) Biology, the science of life. HarperCollins, New York
Tomasik P, Schilling CH (2004) Chemical modification of starch. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 59:175–403
Stepto R 92003) The processing of starch as a thermoplastic. In: Macromolecular symposia, 2003, vol 1. Wiley Online Library, USA, pp 203–212
Primarini D, Ohta Y (2000) Some enzyme properties of raw starch digesting amylases from Streptomyces sp. No. 4. Starch-Stärke 52(1):28–32
Rodrigues A, Emeje M (2012) Recent applications of starch derivatives in nanodrug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 87(2):987–994
Xie F, Pollet E, Halley PJ, Averous L (2013) Starch-based nano-biocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38(10–11):1590–1628
Choi E-J, Kim C-H, Park J-K (1999) Synthesis and characterization of starch-g-polycaprolactone copolymer. Macromolecules 32(22):7402–7408
Peidayesh H, Ahmadi Z, Khonakdar HA, Abdouss M, Chodák I (2020) Baked hydrogel from corn starch and chitosan blends cross-linked by citric acid: preparation and properties. Polym Adv Technol 31(6):1256–1269
Ghosh S, Viana J, Reis R, Mano J (2007) The double porogen approach as a new technique for the fabrication of interconnected poly (l-lactic acid) and starch based biodegradable scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18(2):185–193
Fan Y, Picchioni F (2020) Modification of starch: a review on the application of “green” solvents and controlled functionalization. Carbohydr Polym 241:116350
Thakore I, Desai S, Sarawade B, Devi S (2001) Studies on biodegradability, morphology and thermo-mechanical properties of LDPE/modified starch blends. Eur Polym J 37(1):151–160
Lee B, Kim D, Ryu C-M (2008) A super-absorbent polymer combination promotes bacterial aggressiveness uncoupled from the epiphytic population. Plant Pathol J 24(3):283–288
Chang C, Duan B, Cai J, Zhang L (2010) Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur Polym J 46(1):92–100
Li M, Witt T, Xie F, Warren FJ, Halley PJ, Gilbert RG (2015) Biodegradation of starch films: the roles of molecular and crystalline structure. Carbohydr Polym 122:115–122
Cong H-P, Wang P, Yu S-H (2013) Stretchable and self-healing graphene oxide–polymer composite hydrogels: a dual-network design. Chem Mater 25(16):3357–3362
Yalpani M (2013) Polysaccharides: syntheses, modifications and structure/property relations. Elsevier, New York
Zhao W, Jin X, Cong Y, Liu Y, Fu J (2013) Degradable natural polymer hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(3):327–339
Iizawa T, Taketa H, Maruta M, Ishido T, Gotoh T, Sakohara S (2007) Synthesis of porous poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) gel beads by sedimentation polymerization and their morphology. J Appl Polym Sci 104(2):842–850
Yang L, Chu JS, Fix JA (2002) Colon-specific drug delivery: new approaches and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 235(1–2):1–15
Maolin Z, Jun L, Min Y, Hongfei H (2000) The swelling behavior of radiation prepared semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of polyNIPAAm and hydrophilic polymers. Radiat Phys Chem 58(4):397–400
Ahmed EM (2015) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 6(2):105–121
Koetting MC, Peters JT, Steichen SD, Peppas NA (2015) Stimulus-responsive hydrogels: theory, modern advances, and applications. Mater Sci Eng R 93:1–49
Tokarev I, Minko S (2009) Stimuli-responsive hydrogel thin films. Soft Matter 5(3):511–524
White EM, Yatvin J, Grubbs JB III, Bilbrey JA, Locklin J (2013) Advances in smart materials: stimuli-responsive hydrogel thin films. J Polym Sci B 51(14):1084–1099
Peppas N, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H (2000) Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50(1):27–46
Gil ES, Hudson SM (2004) Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates. Prog Polym Sci 29(12):1173–1222
Kashyap N, Kumar N, Kumar MR (2005) Hydrogels for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carr Syst 22(2):107–149
Richter A (2009) Hydrogels for actuators. In: Gerlach G, Arndt K-F (eds) Hydrogel sensors and actuators. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–248
Dai H, Chen Q, Qin H, Guan Y, Shen D, Hua Y, Tang Y, Xu J (2006) A temperature-responsive copolymer hydrogel in controlled drug delivery. Macromolecules 39(19):6584–6589
Laftah WA, Hashim S, Ibrahim AN (2011) Polymer hydrogels: a review. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 50(14):1475–1486
Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S (2002) Hydrogels: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 7(10):569–579
Traitel T, Kost J (2004) pH-responsive hydrogels: swelling model. In: Biomaterials. Springer, New York, pp 29–43
Xu L, Qiu L, Sheng Y, Sun Y, Deng L, Li X, Bradley M, Zhang R (2018) Biodegradable pH-responsive hydrogels for controlled dual-drug release. J Mater Chem B 6(3):510–517
Bilia A, Carelli V, Di Colo G, Nannipieri E (1996) In vitro evaluation of a pH-sensitive hydrogel for control of GI drug delivery from silicone-based matrices. Int J Pharm 130(1):83–92
Hibbins AR, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Kondiah PP, Marimuthu T, Du Toit LC, Pillay V (2017) Design of a versatile pH-responsive hydrogel for potential oral delivery of gastric-sensitive bioactives. Polymers 9(10):474
Patel A, Mequanint K (2011) Hydrogel biomaterials. In: Biomedical engineering—frontiers and challenges. IntechOpen, Rijeka. https://doi.org/10.5772/24856
Jabari E, Nouzari S (1999) Synthesis of acrylic acid hydrogel by gamma-irradiation cross-linking of polyacrylic acid in aqueous solution. Polym J 8:263–270
Jianqi F, Lixia G (2002) PVA/PAA thermo-crosslinking hydrogel fiber: preparation and pH-sensitive properties in electrolyte solution. Eur Polym J 38(8):1653–1658
Li J, Li X, Ni X, Wang X, Li H, Leong KW (2006) Self-assembled supramolecular hydrogels formed by biodegradable PEO–PHB–PEO triblock copolymers and α-cyclodextrin for controlled drug delivery. Biomaterials 27(22):4132–4140
Baker JP, Stephens DR, Blanch HW, Prausnitz JM (1992) Swelling equilibria for acrylamide-based polyampholyte hydrogels. Macromolecules 25(7):1955–1958
Han Z, Wang P, Mao G, Yin T, Zhong D, Yiming B, Hu X, Jia Z, Nian G, Qu S (2020) Dual pH-responsive hydrogel actuator for lipophilic drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(10):12010–12017
Tabata Y (2009) Biomaterial technology for tissue engineering applications. J R Soc Interface 6(Suppl_3):S311–S324
Shantha K, Harding D (2002) Synthesis and evaluation of sucrose-containing polymeric hydrogels for oral drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci 84(14):2597–2604
Singh SK, Dhyani A, Juyal D (2017) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization and applications. Pharma Innov J 6(6):25–32
Ranganathan N, Joseph Bensingh R, Abdul Kader M, Nayak S (2018) Synthesis and properties of hydrogels prepared by various polymerization reaction systems. Springer, Cham, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76573-0_18-1
Sannino A, Esposito A, Nicolais L, Del Nobile MA, Giovane A, Balestrieri C, Esposito R, Agresti M (2000) Cellulose-based hydrogels as body water retainers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 11(4):247–253
Sannino A, Madaghiele M, Conversano F, Mele G, Maffezzoli A, Netti P, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L (2004) Cellulose derivative—hyaluronic acid-based microporous hydrogels cross-linked through divinyl sulfone (DVS) to modulate equilibrium sorption capacity and network stability. Biomacromolecules 5(1):92–96
Sannino A, Pappadà S, Madaghiele M, Maffezzoli A, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L (2005) Crosslinking of cellulose derivatives and hyaluronic acid with water-soluble carbodiimide. Polymer 46(25):11206–11212
Sannino A, Nicolais L (2005) Concurrent effect of microporosity and chemical structure on the equilibrium sorption properties of cellulose-based hydrogels. Polymer 46(13):4676–4685
Tieke B (2014) Makromolekulare Chemie: Eine Einführung, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Ma S, Yu B, Pei X, Zhou F (2016) Structural hydrogels. Polymer 98:516–535
Gulrez SK, Al-Assaf S, Phillips GO (2015) Hydrogels: methods of preparation, characterisation and applications. Adv Res 6(2):105–121
Vickers NJ (2017) Animal communication: when I’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol 27(14):R713–R715
Ogata T, Nagayoshi K, Nagasako T, Kurihara S, Nonaka T (2006) Synthesis of hydrogel beads having phosphinic acid groups and its adsorption ability for lanthanide ions. React Funct Polym 66(6):625–633
Hennink W (2002) Novel cross linking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:13–36
Rosiak JM, Yoshii F (1999) Hydrogels and their medical applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 151(1–4):56–64
Chauhan S, Harikumar S, Kanupriya (2012) Hydrogels, a smart drug delivery system. Int J Res Pharm Chem 2(3):604–615
Vasquez JMG, Tumolva TP (2015) Synthesis and characterization of a self-assembling hydrogel from water-soluble cellulose derivatives and sodium hydroxide/thiourea solution. In: 11th Engineering research and development for technology conference, 2015, pp 60–65
Zohourian MM, Kabiri K (2008) Superabsorbent polymer materials: a review. Iran Polym J (Engl) 17:447–451
Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF (2012) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:223–236
Kuo CK, Ma PX (2001) Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: Part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 22(6):511–521
Akhtar MF, Hanif M, Ranjha NM (2016) Methods of synthesis of hydrogels… A review. Saudi Pharm J 24(5):554–559
Kamoun EA, Kenawy E-RS, Tamer TM, El-Meligy MA, Eldin MSM (2015) Poly (vinyl alcohol)-alginate physically crosslinked hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: characterization and bio-evaluation. Arab J Chem 8(1):38–47
Chung HJ, Park TG (2009) Self-assembled and nanostructured hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Nano Today 4(5):429–437
Vieira EF, Cestari AR, Airoldi C, Loh W (2008) Polysaccharide-based hydrogels: preparation, characterization, and drug interaction behaviour. Biomacromolecules 9(4):1195–1199
Nguyen KT, West JL (2002) Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23(22):4307–4314
Aly AS (1998) Self-dissolving chitosan, I. Preparation, characterization and evaluation for drug delivery system. Die Angew Makromol Chem 259(1):13–18
Connell JJ (1975) The role of formaldehyde as a protein crosslinking agent acting during the frozen storage of cod. J Sci Food Agric 26(12):1925–1929
Liu SQ, Tay R, Khan M, Ee PLR, Hedrick JL, Yang YY (2010) Synthetic hydrogels for controlled stem cell differentiation. Soft Matter 6(1):67–81
Miyata T, Uragami T, Nakamae K (2002) Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54(1):79–98
Imamura E, Sawatani O, Koyanagi H, Noishiki Y, Miyata T (1989) Epoxy compounds as a new cross-linking agent for porcine aortic leaflets: subcutaneous implant studies in rats. J Card Surg 4(1):50–57
Xiao C (2013) Current advances of chemical and physical starch-based hydrogels. Starch-Stärke 65(1–2):82–88
Gulati N, Nagaich U, Sharma V, Khosa R (2011) Effect of polymer and cross linking agent on in vitro release of quercetin from microbeads. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. ISSN 2231:4423
Zhu J (2010) Bioactive modification of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(17):4639–4656
Ramamurthi A, Vesely I (2003) Ultraviolet light-induced modification of crosslinked hyaluronan gels. J Biomed Mater Res A Off J Soc Biomater Jpn Soc Biomater Aust Soc Biomater Korean Soc Biomater 66(2):317–329
Denizli BK, Can HK, Rzaev ZM, Guner A (2004) Preparation conditions and swelling equilibria of dextran hydrogels prepared by some crosslinking agents. Polymer 45(19):6431–6435
Hoare TR, Kohane DS (2008) Hydrogels in drug delivery: progress and challenges. Polymer 49(8):1993–2007
Reddy N, Yang Y (2011) Potential of plant proteins for medical applications. Trends Biotechnol 29(10):490–498
Funami T, Hiroe M, Noda S, Asai I, Ikeda S, Nishinari K (2007) Influence of molecular structure imaged with atomic force microscopy on the rheological behavior of carrageenan aqueous systems in the presence or absence of cations. Food Hydrocoll 21(4):617–629
Shen J, Zhou X, Wu W, Ma Y (2012) Improving paper strength by gelation of native starch and borax in the presence of fibers. BioResources 7(4):5542–5551
Glenn GM, Klamczynski A, Chiou BS, Orts WJ, Imam SH, Wood DF (2008) Temperature related structural changes in wheat and corn starch granules and their effects on gels and dry foam. Starch-Stärke 60(9):476–484
García-González C, Uy J, Alnaief M, Smirnova I (2012) Preparation of tailor-made starch-based aerogel microspheres by the emulsion-gelation method. Carbohydr Polym 88(4):1378–1386
Mehling T, Smirnova I, Guenther U, Neubert R (2009) Polysaccharide-based aerogels as drug carriers. J Non-Cryst Solids 355(50–51):2472–2479
Roy A, Bajpai J, Bajpai A (2009) Dynamics of controlled release of chlorpyrifos from swelling and eroding biopolymeric microspheres of calcium alginate and starch. Carbohydr Polym 76(2):222–231
Calinescu C, Mondovi B, Federico R, Ispas-Szabo P, Mateescu MA (2012) Carboxymethyl starch: chitosan monolithic matrices containing diamine oxidase and catalase for intestinal delivery. Int J Pharm 428(1–2):48–56
Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R (2006) Hydrogels in biology and medicine: from molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv Mater 18(11):1345–1360
Kim TH, An DB, Oh SH, Kang MK, Song HH, Lee JH (2015) Creating stiffness gradient polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel using a simple gradual freezing–thawing method to investigate stem cell differentiation behaviors. Biomaterials 40:51–60
Xiao C, Gao F, Gao Y (2010) Controlled preparation of physically crosslinked chitosan-g-poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. J Appl Polym Sci 117(5):2946–2950
Lin Y, Wang L, Zhou J, Ye L, Hu H, Luo Z, Zhou L (2019) Surface modification of PVA hydrogel membranes with carboxybetaine methacrylate via PET-RAFT for anti-fouling. Polymer 162:80–90
Sreedhar B, Chattopadhyay D, Karunakar MSH, Sastry A (2006) Thermal and surface characterization of plasticized starch polyvinyl alcohol blends crosslinked with epichlorohydrin. J Appl Polym Sci 101(1):25–34
Xiao C, Yang M (2006) Controlled preparation of physical cross-linked starch-g-PVA hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 64(1):37–40
Lu D, Xiao C, Xu S, Ye Y (2011) Tailor-made starch-based conjugates containing well-defined poly (vinyl acetate) and its derivative poly (vinyl alcohol). eXPRESS Polym Lett 5(6):535–544
Tan Y, Xu K, Liu C, Li Y, Lu C, Wang P (2012) Fabrication of starch-based nanospheres to stabilize pickering emulsion. Carbohydr Polym 88(4):1358–1363
Ebdon JR, Price D, Hunt BJ, Joseph P, Gao F, Milnes GJ, Cunliffe LK (2000) Flame retardance in some polystyrenes and poly (methyl methacrylate) s with covalently bound phosphorus-containing groups: initial screening experiments and some laser pyrolysis mechanistic studies. Polym Degrad Stab 69(3):267–277
Ishigaki T, Kawagoshi Y, Ike M, Fujita M (1999) Biodegradation of a polyvinyl alcohol–starch blend plastic film. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 15(3):321–327
Jayasekara R, Harding I, Bowater I, Christie G, Lonergan GT (2004) Preparation, surface modification and characterisation of solution cast starch PVA blended films. Polym Test 23(1):17–27
Bourtoom T, Chinnan MS (2008) Preparation and properties of rice starch–chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT Food Sci Technol 41(9):1633–1641
Mani R, Bhattacharya M (2001) Properties of injection moulded blends of starch and modified biodegradable polyesters. Eur Polym J 37(3):515–526
Ratto JA, Stenhouse PJ, Auerbach M, Mitchell J, Farrell R (1999) Processing, performance and biodegradability of a thermoplastic aliphatic polyester/starch system. Polymer 40(24):6777–6788
Jun CL (2000) Reactive blending of biodegradable polymers: PLA and starch. J Polym Environ 8(1):33–37
Shogren R, Doane W, Garlotta D, Lawton J, Willett J (2003) Biodegradation of starch/polylactic acid/poly (hydroxyester-ether) composite bars in soil. Polym Degrad Stab 79(3):405–411
Ke T, Sun XS (2003) Starch, poly (lactic acid), and poly (vinyl alcohol) blends. J Polym Environ 11(1):7–14
Wang N, Yu J, Ma X (2007) Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic starch/PLA blends by one-step reactive extrusion. Polym Int 56(11):1440–1447
Wang N, Yu J, Chang PR, Ma X (2008) Influence of formamide and water on the properties of thermoplastic starch/poly (lactic acid) blends. Carbohydr Polym 71(1):109–118
Li H, Huneault MA (2011) Comparison of sorbitol and glycerol as plasticizers for thermoplastic starch in TPS/PLA blends. J Appl Polym Sci 119(4):2439–2448
Park JW, Im SS, Kim SH, Kim YH (2000) Biodegradable polymer blends of poly (l-lactic acid) and gelatinized starch. Polym Eng Sci 40(12):2539–2550
Martin O, Avérous L (2001) Poly (lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems. Polymer 42(14):6209–6219
Di Franco C, Cyras VP, Busalmen JP, Ruseckaite RA, Vázquez A (2004) Degradation of polycaprolactone/starch blends and composites with sisal fibre. Polym Degrad Stab 86(1):95–103
Vertuccio L, Gorrasi G, Sorrentino A, Vittoria V (2009) Nano clay reinforced PCL/starch blends obtained by high energy ball milling. Carbohydr Polym 75(1):172–179
Jang WY, Shin BY, Lee TJ, Narayan R (2007) Thermal properties and morphology of biodegradable PLA/starch compatibilized blends. J Ind Eng Chem 13(3):457–464
Tudorachi N, Cascaval C, Rusu M, Pruteanu M (2000) Testing of polyvinyl alcohol and starch mixtures as biodegradable polymeric materials. Polym Test 19(7):785–799
Lawton J (1996) Effect of starch type on the properties of starch containing films. Carbohydr Polym 29(3):203–208
Haschke H, Tomka I, Keilbach A (1998) Systematic investigations on the biological degradability of packing material II. On the biodegradability of polyvinyl alcohol based films. Mon Chem 129(4):365–386
Zhai M, Zhao L, Yoshii F, Kume T (2004) Study on antibacterial starch/chitosan blend film formed under the action of irradiation. Carbohydr Polym 57(1):83–88
Arvanitoyannis I, Biliaderis CG (1998) Physical properties of polyol-plasticized edible films made from sodium caseinate and soluble starch blends. Food Chem 62(3):333–342
Garcia MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE (1999) Edible starch films and coatings characterization: scanning electron microscopy, water vapor, and gas permeabilities. Scanning 21(5):348–353
Lourdin D, Della Valle G, Colonna P (1995) Influence of amylose content on starch films and foams. Carbohydr Polym 27(4):261–270
Mali S, Grossmann MVE (2003) Effects of yam starch films on storability and quality of fresh strawberries (Fragaria ananassa). J Agric Food Chem 51(24):7005–7011
Lazaridou A, Biliaderis CG (2002) Thermophysical properties of chitosan, chitosan–starch and chitosan–pullulan films near the glass transition. Carbohydr Polym 48(2):179–190
Psomiadou E, Arvanitoyannis I, Yamamoto N (1996) Edible films made from natural resources; microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), methylcellulose (MC) and corn starch and polyols—Part 2. Carbohydr Polym 31(4):193–204
Suvorova AI, Tyukova IS, Trufanova EI (2000) Biodegradable starch-based polymeric materials. Russ Chem Rev 69(5):451
Cao X, Chen Y, Chang P, Muir A, Falk G (2008) Starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with flax cellulose nanocrystals. Express Polym Lett 2:502–510
Burkert S, Schmidt T, Gohs U, Dorschner H, Arndt K-F (2007) Cross-linking of poly (N-vinyl pyrrolidone) films by electron beam irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 76(8–9):1324–1328
Maitra J, Shukla VK (2014) Cross-linking in hydrogels—a review. Am J Polym Sci 4(2):25–31
Bao J, Xing J, Phillips DL, Corke H (2003) Physical properties of octenyl succinic anhydride modified rice, wheat, and potato starches. J Agric Food Chem 51(8):2283–2287
Spychaj T, Wilpiszewska K, Zdanowicz M (2013) Medium and high substituted carboxymethyl starch: synthesis, characterization and application. Starch-Stärke 65(1–2):22–33
Dragan ES, Apopei DF (2011) Synthesis and swelling behavior of pH-sensitive semi-interpenetrating polymer network composite hydrogels based on native and modified potatoes starch as potential sorbent for cationic dyes. Chem Eng J 178:252–263
Athawale V, Lele V (1998) Graft copolymerization onto starch. II. Grafting of acrylic acid and preparation of it’s hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 35(1–2):21–27
Kiatkamjornwong S, Mongkolsawat K, Sonsuk M (2002) Synthesis and property characterization of cassava starch grafted poly [acrylamide-co-(maleic acid)] superabsorbent via γ-irradiation. Polymer 43(14):3915–3924
Chen L, Qiu X, Xie Z, Hong Z, Sun J, Chen X, Jing X (2006) Poly (l-lactide)/starch blends compatibilized with poly (l-lactide)-g-starch copolymer. Carbohydr Polym 65(1):75–80
Choi EJ, Kim CH, Park JK (1999) Structure–property relationship in PCL/starch blend compatibilized with starch-g-PCL copolymer. J Polym Sci B 37(17):2430–2438
Pourjavadi A, Harzandi A, Hosseinzadeh H (2004) Modified carrageenan 3. Synthesis of a novel polysaccharide-based superabsorbent hydrogel via graft copolymerization of acrylic acid onto kappa-carrageenan in air. Eur Polym J 40(7):1363–1370
Wen H, De Wijn J, Cui F, De Groot K (1998) Preparation of bioactive Ti6Al4V surfaces by a simple method. Biomaterials 19(1–3):215–221
Patil NS, Li Y, Rethwisch DG, Dordick JS (1997) Sucrose diacrylate: a unique chemically and biologically degradable crosslinker for polymeric hydrogels. J Polym Sci A 35(11):2221–2229
Reddy N, Reddy R, Jiang Q (2015) Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 33(6):362–369
Tessier FJ, Monnier VM, Sayre LM, Kornfield JA (2003) Triosidines: novel Maillard reaction products and cross-links from the reaction of triose sugars with lysine and arginine residues. Biochem J 369(3):705–719
Pal K, Banthia A, Majumdar D (2006) Preparation of transparent starch based hydrogel membrane with potential application as wound dressing. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 20(1):59–67
Blanes M, Gisbert M, Marco B, Bonet M, Gisbert J, Balart R (2010) Influence of glyoxal in the physical characterization of PVA nanofibers. Text Res J 80(14):1465–1472
Gahlawat P, Sen C, Das M (2015) Effect of molecular weight of polyvinyl alcohol on properties of starch film cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. Agric Eng Food Technol 2(1):12–16
Gadhave RV, Mahanwar PA, Gadekar PT (2019) Effect of glutaraldehyde on thermal and mechanical properties of starch and polyvinyl alcohol blends. Des Monomers Polym 22(1):164–170
Grote C, Lazik W, Heinze T (2003) Tartaric acid starch ether: a novel biopolymer-based polyelectrolyte. Macromol Rapid Commun 24(16):927–931
Sangseethong K, Chatakanonda P, Sriroth K (2018) Superabsorbent hydrogels from rice starches with different amylose contents. Starch-Stärke 70(11–12):1700244
Demitri C, Del Sole R, Scalera F, Sannino A, Vasapollo G, Maffezzoli A, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L (2008) Novel superabsorbent cellulose-based hydrogels crosslinked with citric acid. J Appl Polym Sci 110(4):2453–2460
Xie X, Liu Q (2004) Development and physicochemical characterization of new resistant citrate starch from different corn starches. Starch-Stärke 56(8):364–370
Hashim K, Dahlan K, Noordin N, Yoshii F (2000) Hydrogel of sago starch/water-soluble polymers by electron beam irradiation technique. In: International symposium on radiation technology in emerging industrial applications. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-SM-365
Geresh S, Gilboa Y, Peisahov-Korol J, Gdalevsky G, Voorspoels J, Remon JP, Kost J (2002) Preparation and characterization of bioadhesive grafted starch copolymers as platforms for controlled drug delivery. J Appl Polym Sci 86(5):1157–1162
Zhai M, Yoshii F, Kume T, Hashim K (2002) Syntheses of PVA/starch grafted hydrogels by irradiation. Carbohydr Polym 50(3):295–303
Yoshii F, Zhao L, Wach RA, Nagasawa N, Mitomo H, Kume T (2003) Hydrogels of polysaccharide derivatives crosslinked with irradiation at paste-like condition. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 208:320–324
Kaur I, Devi S (2014) Synthesis and characterization of acrylamide grafted cross-linked corn starch and its use in water remedial applications. Trends Carbohydr Res 6(2):17–33
Peppas NA, Khare AR (1993) Preparation, structure and diffusional behavior of hydrogels in controlled release. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 11(1–2):1–35
Rosiak J, Ulański P (1999) Synthesis of hydrogels by irradiation of polymers in aqueous solution. Radiat Phys Chem 55(2):139–151
Lv X, Song W, Ti Y, Qu L, Zhao Z, Zheng H (2013) Gamma radiation-induced grafting of acrylamide and dimethyl diallyl ammonium chloride onto starch. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):388–393
Geresh S, Gdalevsky GY, Gilboa I, Voorspoels J, Remon JP, Kost J (2004) Bioadhesive grafted starch copolymers as platforms for peroral drug delivery: a study of theophylline release. J Control Release 94(2–3):391–399
Abd El-Mohdy H, Hegazy E, El-Nesr E, El-Wahab M (2016) Synthesis, characterization and properties of radiation-induced Starch/(EG-co-MAA) hydrogels. Arab J Chem 9:S1627–S1635
Huang L, Xiao C (2013) Formation of a tunable starch-based network by in situ incorporation of mercapto groups and a subsequent thiol-ene click reaction. Polym Int 62(3):427–431
Hoyle CE, Bowman CN (2010) Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(9):1540–1573
Kade MJ, Burke DJ, Hawker CJ (2010) The power of thiol-ene chemistry. J Polym Sci A 48(4):743–750
Peppas NA, Berner RE Jr (1980) Proposed method of intracopdal injection and gelation of poly (vinyl alcohol) solution in vocal cords: polymer considerations. Biomaterials 3:158–162
Dai W, Barbari T (1999) Hydrogel membranes with mesh size asymmetry based on the gradient crosslinking of poly (vinyl alcohol). J Membr Sci 156(1):67–79
Jameela S, Jayakrishnan A (1995) Glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan microspheres as a long acting biodegradable drug delivery vehicle: studies on the in vitro release of mitoxantrone and in vivo degradation of microspheres in rat muscle. Biomaterials 16(10):769–775
Gehrke SH, Uhden LH, McBride JF (1998) Enhanced loading and activity retention of bioactive proteins in hydrogel delivery systems. J Control Release 55(1):21–33
Coviello T, Grassi M, Rambone G, Santucci E, Carafa M, Murtas E, Riccieri FM, Alhaique F (1999) Novel hydrogel system from scleroglucan: synthesis and characterization. J Control Release 60(2–3):367–378
Giammona G, Pitarresi G, Cavallaro G, Spadaro G (1999) New biodegradable hydrogels based on an acryloylated polyaspartamide cross-linked by gamma irradiation. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 10(9):969–987
Minhas MU, Ahmad M, Ali L, Sohail M (2013) Synthesis of chemically cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol-co-poly (methacrylic acid) hydrogels by copolymerization; a potential graft-polymeric carrier for oral delivery of 5-fluorouracil. DARU J Pharm Sci 21(1):1–9
Ahmed A, Niazi MBK, Jahan Z, Samin G, Pervaiz E, Hussain A, Mehran MT (2020) Enhancing the thermal, mechanical and swelling properties of PVA/starch nanocomposite membranes incorporating gC3N4. J Polym Environ 28(1):100–115
Sadeghi M (2011) Synthesis of starch-g-poly (acrylic acid-co-2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate) as a potential pH-sensitive hydrogel-based drug delivery system. Turk J Chem 35(5):723–733
Kaith BS, Jindal R, Mittal H, Kumar K (2012) Synthesis, characterization, and swelling behavior evaluation of hydrogels based on gum ghatti and acrylamide for selective absorption of saline from different petroleum fraction–saline emulsions. J Appl Polym Sci 124(3):2037–2047
Farag AM, Sokker HH, Zayed EM, Eldien FAN, Abd Alrahman NM (2018) Removal of hazardous pollutants using bifunctional hydrogel obtained from modified starch by grafting copolymerization. Int J Biol Macromol 120:2188–2199
Weisenhorn AL, Khorsandi M, Kasas S, Gotzos V, Butt H-J (1993) Deformation and height anomaly of soft surfaces studied with an AFM. Nanotechnology 4(2):106
Kaith B, Kumar K (2007) Selective absorption of water from different oil–water emulsions with Psy-cl-poly (AAm) synthesized using irradiation copolymerization method. Bull Mater Sci 30(4):387–391
Chin SF, Romainor ANB, Pang SC, Lihan S (2019) Antimicrobial starch-citrate hydrogel for potential applications as drug delivery carriers. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 54:101239
Batool S, Hussain Z, Niazi MBK, Liaqat U, Afzal M (2019) Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of physical and antimicrobial properties of Ag/PVA/starch nanocomposites hydrogel membranes for wound dressing application. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 52:403–414
Bursali EA, Coskun S, Kizil M, Yurdakoc M (2011) Synthesis, characterization and in vitro antimicrobial activities of boron/starch/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 83(3):1377–1383
Kaith B, Jindal R, Mittal H, Kumar K, Nagla K (2010) Synthesis and characterization of Gum ghatti based electro-sensitive smart networks. Trends Carbohydr Res 2:35–44
Bo J (1992) Study on PVA hydrogel crosslinked by epichlorohydrin. J Appl Polym Sci 46(5):783–786
Bialik-Wąs K, Tyliszczak B, Edyta W, Pielichowski K (2013) Preparation of innovative hydrogel wound dressings based on poly (acrylic acid). Chemik 67(2):99–104
Pal K, Banthia AK, Majumdar DK (2007) Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-gelatin hydrogel membranes for biomedical applications. AAPS PharmSciTech 8(1):142–146
Singh B, Sharma S, Dhiman A (2013) Design of antibiotic containing hydrogel wound dressings: biomedical properties and histological study of wound healing. Int J Pharm 457(1):82–91
Annabi N, Rana D, Sani ES, Portillo-Lara R, Gifford JL, Fares MM, Mithieux SM, Weiss AS (2017) Engineering a sprayable and elastic hydrogel adhesive with antimicrobial properties for wound healing. Biomaterials 139:229–243
Aziz MA, Cabral JD, Brooks HJ, Moratti SC, Hanton LR (2012) Antimicrobial properties of a chitosan dextran-based hydrogel for surgical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56(1):280–287
Mondal MI, Haque MO (2019) Cellulosic hydrogels: a greener solution of sustainability. In: Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. Springer, Cham, pp 3–35
Abd El-Mohdy H, Ghanem S (2009) Biodegradability, antimicrobial activity and properties of PVA/PVP hydrogels prepared by γ-irradiation. J Polym Res 16(1):1–10
Kaith B, Kumar K (2007) In vacuum preparation of psy-cl-poly (AAm) superabsorbent and its applications in oil-industry. E-Polymers. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly.2007.7.1.14
Kaith B, Kumar K (2008) In vacuum synthesis of psyllium and acrylic acid based hydrogels for selective water absorption from different oil–water emulsions. Desalination 229(1–3):331–341
Marques A, Reis R, Hunt J (2002) The biocompatibility of novel starch-based polymers and composites: in vitro studies. Biomaterials 23(6):1471–1478
Mendes SC, Reis R, Bovell YP, Cunha A, van Blitterswijk CA, de Bruijn JD (2001) Biocompatibility testing of novel starch-based materials with potential application in orthopaedic surgery: a preliminary study. Biomaterials 22(14):2057–2064
Azevedo HS, Gama FM, Reis RL (2003) In vitro assessment of the enzymatic degradation of several starch based biomaterials. Biomacromolecules 4(6):1703–1712
Defaye J, Wong E (1986) Structural studies of gum Arabic, the exudate polysaccharide from Acacia senegal. Carbohydr Res 150(1):221–231
Reddy SM, Sinha VR, Reddy DS (1999) Novel oral colon-specific drug delivery systems for pharmacotherapy of peptide and nonpeptide drugs. Drugs Today 35(7):537–580
Sinha VR, Kumria R (2001) Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm 224(1–2):19–38
Simoes S, Figueiras A, Veiga F (2012) Modular hydrogels for drug delivery. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 3:185–199
Boesel LF, Mano JF, Reis RL (2004) Optimization of the formulation and mechanical properties of starch based partially degradable bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(1):73–83
Pal K, Banthia A, Majumdar D (2006) Starch based hydrogel with potential biomedical application as artificial skin. Afr J Biomed Res 9(1):23–29
Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, Schacht E (2011) Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. Biomacromolecules 12(5):1387–1408
Jhon MS, Andrade JD (1973) Water and hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res 7(6):509–522
Costa-Pinto AR, Reis RL, Neves NM (2011) Scaffolds based bone tissue engineering: the role of chitosan. Tissue Eng B 17(5):331–347
Ito A, Mase A, Takizawa Y, Shinkai M, Honda H, Hata K-I, Ueda M, Kobayashi T (2003) Transglutaminase-mediated gelatin matrices incorporating cell adhesion factors as a biomaterial for tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng 95(2):196–199
Salgado A, Coutinho OP, Reis RL (2004) Novel starch-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: cytotoxicity, cell culture, and protein expression. Tissue Eng 10(3–4):465–474
Kamoun EA (2016) N-succinyl chitosan–dialdehyde starch hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications. J Adv Res 7(1):69–77
Malafaya PB, Silva GA, Reis RL (2007) Natural–origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(4–5):207–233
Silva G, Costa F, Neves N, Coutinho O, Dias ACP, Reis R (2005) Entrapment ability and release profile of corticosteroids from starch-based microparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A Off J Soc Biomater Jpn Soc Biomater Aust Soc Biomater Korean Soc Biomater 73(2):234–243
Santos MI, Fuchs S, Gomes ME, Unger RE, Reis RL, Kirkpatrick CJ (2007) Response of micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells to starch-based fiber meshes for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28(2):240–248
Salgado A, Coutinho OP, Reis RL, Davies J (2007) In vivo response to starch-based scaffolds designed for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 80(4):983–989
Lu L, Mikos AG (1996) The importance of new processing techniques in tissue engineering. MRS Bull 21(11):28–32
Malafaya PB, Gomes ME, Salgado AJ, Reis RL (2003) Polymer based scaffolds and carriers for bioactive agents from different natural origin materials. In: Tissue engineering, stem cells, and gene therapies. Springer, New York, pp 201–233
Mikos AG, Bao Y, Cima LG, Ingber DE, Vacanti JP, Langer R (1993) Preparation of poly (glycolic acid) bonded fiber structures for cell attachment and transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res 27(2):183–189
Gomes ME, Ribeiro A, Malafaya P, Reis R, Cunha A (2001) A new approach based on injection moulding to produce biodegradable starch-based polymeric scaffolds: morphology, mechanical and degradation behaviour. Biomaterials 22(9):883–889
Langer R (1999) Selected advances in drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Control Release 62(1–2):7–11
Agrawal C, Athanasiou K, Heckman J (1997) Biodegradable PLA-PGA polymers for tissue engineering in orthopaedics. In: Materials Science Forum, 1997. Trans Tech Publ, pp 115–128
Mikos AG, Thorsen AJ, Czerwonka LA, Bao Y, Langer R, Winslow DN, Vacanti JP (1994) Preparation and characterization of poly (l-lactic acid) foams. Polymer 35(5):1068–1077
Ribeiro A, Malafaya P, Reis R (1999) Microwave based methodologies for the production of polymeric and ceramic porous architectures to be used in bone replacement, tissue engineering and drug delivery. In: 25th Annual meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Providence, USA, 1999, p 555
Noè C, Tonda-Turo C, Chiappone A, Sangermano M, Hakkarainen M (2020) Light processable starch hydrogels. Polymers 12(6):1359
Ngoenkam J, Faikrua A, Yasothornsrikul S, Viyoch J (2010) Potential of an injectable chitosan/starch/β-glycerol phosphate hydrogel for sustaining normal chondrocyte function. Int J Pharm 391(1–2):115–124
Gomes ME, Sikavitsas VI, Behravesh E, Reis RL, Mikos AG (2003) Effect of flow perfusion on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on starch-based three-dimensional scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A Off J Soc Biomater Jpn Soc Biomater Aust Soc Biomater Korean Soc Biomater 67(1):87–95
Chen L-G, Liu Z-L, Zhuo R-X (2005) Synthesis and properties of degradable hydrogels of konjac glucomannan grafted acrylic acid for colon-specific drug delivery. Polymer 46(16):6274–6281
Liu C, Gan X, Chen Y (2011) A novel pH-sensitive hydrogels for potential colon-specific drug delivery: characterization and in vitro release studies. Starch-Stärke 63(8):503–511
Ali AE-H, AlArifi A (2009) Characterization and in vitro evaluation of starch based hydrogels as carriers for colon specific drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym 78(4):725–730
Kidane A, Bhatt PP (2005) Recent advances in small molecule drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9(4):347–351
Reis AV, Guilherme MR, Moia TA, Mattoso LH, Muniz EC, Tambourgi EB (2008) Synthesis and characterization of a starch-modified hydrogel as potential carrier for drug delivery system. J Polym Sci A 46(7):2567–2574
Shalviri A, Liu Q, Abdekhodaie MJ, Wu XY (2010) Novel modified starch–xanthan gum hydrogels for controlled drug delivery: synthesis and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 79(4):898–907
Dave A, Mehta M, Aminabhavi T, Kulkarni A, Soppimath K (1999) A review on controlled release of nitrogen fertilizers through polymeric membrane devices. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 38(4):675–711
Kakoulides EP, Valkanas GN (1994) Modified rosin-paraffin wax resins as controlled delivery systems for fertilizers. 1. Fabrication parameters governing fertilizer release in water. Ind Eng Chem Res 33(6):1623–1630
Teixeira MA, Paterson WJ, Dunn EJ, Li Q, Hunter BK, Goosen MF (1990) Assessment of chitosan gels for the controlled release of agrochemicals. Ind Eng Chem Res 29(7):1205–1209
Jarosiewicz A, Tomaszewska M (2003) Controlled-release NPK fertilizer encapsulated by polymeric membranes. J Agric Food Chem 51(2):413–417
Novillo J, Rico MI, Alvarez JM (2001) Controlled release of manganese into water from coated experimental fertilizers. Laboratory characterization. J Agric Food Chem 49(3):1298–1303
Ge J, Wu R, Shi X, Yu H, Wang M, Li W (2002) Biodegradable polyurethane materials from bark and starch. II. Coating material for controlled-release fertilizer. J Appl Polym Sci 86(12):2948–2952
Mohana Raju K, Padmanabha Raju M (2001) Synthesis of novel superabsorbing copolymers for agricultural and horticultural applications. Polym Int 50(8):946–951
Guo M, Liu M, Zhan F, Wu L (2005) Preparation and properties of a slow-release membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(12):4206–4211
Dilara P, Briassoulis D (2000) Degradation and stabilization of low-density polyethylene films used as greenhouse covering materials. J Agric Eng Res 76(4):309–321
Kumbar SG, Kulkarni AR, Dave AM, Aminabhavi TM (2001) Encapsulation efficiency and release kinetics of solid and liquid pesticides through urea formaldehyde crosslinked starch, guar gum, and starch+ guar gum matrices. J Appl Polym Sci 82(11):2863–2866
Niu Y, Li H (2012) Controlled release of urea encapsulated by starch-g-poly (vinyl acetate). Ind Eng Chem Res 51(38):12173–12177
Mogul MG, Akin H, Hasirci N, Trantolo DJ, Gresser JD, Wise DL (1996) Controlled release of biologically active agents for purposes of agricultural crop management. Resour Conserv Recycl 16(1–4):289–320
Ravier I, Haouisee E, Clément M, Seux R, Briand O (2005) Field experiments for the evaluation of pesticide spray-drift on arable crops. Pest Manag Sci Former Pestic Sci 61(8):728–736
Fernández-Pérez M, Villafranca-Sanchez M, Gonzalez-Pradas E, Flores-Cespedes F (1999) Controlled release of diuron from an alginate–bentonite formulation: water release kinetics and soil mobility study. J Agric Food Chem 47(2):791–798
Dailey OD (2004) Volatilization of alachlor from polymeric formulations. J Agric Food Chem 52(22):6742–6746
Chevillard A, Angellier-Coussy H, Guillard V, Gontard N, Gastaldi E (2012) Controlling pesticide release via structuring agropolymer and nanoclays based materials. J Hazard Mater 205:32–39
Singh B, Sharma D, Gupta A (2008) In vitro release dynamics of thiram fungicide from starch and poly (methacrylic acid)-based hydrogels. J Hazard Mater 154(1–3):278–286
Celis R, Facenda G, Hermosin MC, Cornejo J (2005) Assessing factors influencing the release of hexazinone from clay-based formulations. Int J Environ Anal Chem 85(15):1153–1164
Singh B, Sharma D, Kumar R, Gupta A (2009) Controlled release of the fungicide thiram from starch–alginate–clay based formulation. Appl Clay Sci 45(1–2):76–82
Rychter P, Lewicka K, Pastusiak M, Domański M, Dobrzyński P (2019) PLGA–PEG terpolymers as a carriers of bioactive agents, influence of PEG blocks content on degradation and release of herbicides into soil. Polym Degrad Stab 161:95–107
Chen P, Zhang WA, Luo W, Ye F (2004) Synthesis of superabsorbent polymers by irradiation and their applications in agriculture. J Appl Polym Sci 93(4):1748–1755
Muller J, González-Martínez C, Chiralt A (2017) Combination of poly (lactic) acid and starch for biodegradable food packaging. Materials 10(8):952
Zhao R, Torley P, Halley PJ (2008) Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43(9):3058–3071
Khan B, Bilal Khan Niazi M, Samin G, Jahan Z (2017) Thermoplastic starch: a possible biodegradable food packaging material—a review. J Food Process Eng 40(3):e12447
O’Grady M, Monahan F, Bailey J, Allen P, Buckley D, Keane M (1998) Colour-stabilising effect of muscle vitamin E in minced beef stored in high oxygen packs. Meat Sci 50(1):73–80
Ortega-Toro R, Jiménez A, Talens P, Chiralt A (2014) Effect of the incorporation of surfactants on the physical properties of corn starch films. Food Hydrocoll 38:66–75
Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A (2012) Edible and biodegradable starch films: a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 5(6):2058–2076
Cano A, Cháfer M, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C (2016) Development and characterization of active films based on starch–PVA, containing silver nanoparticles. Food Packag Shelf Life 10:16–24
Avella M, De Vlieger JJ, Errico ME, Fischer S, Vacca P, Volpe MG (2005) Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem 93(3):467–474
López OV, García MA, Zaritzky NE (2008) Film forming capacity of chemically modified corn starches. Carbohydr Polym 73(4):573–581
Pagella C, Spigno G, De Faveri D (2002) Characterization of starch based edible coatings. Food Bioprod Process 80(3):193–198
Burfoot D, Middleton K (2009) Effects of operating conditions of high pressure washing on the removal of biofilms from stainless steel surfaces. J Food Eng 90(3):350–357
Flores S, Haedo AS, Campos C, Gerschenson L (2007) Antimicrobial performance of potassium sorbate supported in tapioca starch edible films. Eur Food Res Technol 225(3–4):375–384
Siracusa V, Rocculi P, Romani S, Dalla Rosa M (2008) Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 19(12):634–643
Liu F, Qin B, He L, Song R (2009) Novel starch/chitosan blending membrane: antibacterial, permeable and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym 78(1):146–150
Jyothi AN, Moorthy SN, Rajasekharan KN (2006) Effect of cross-linking with epichlorohydrin on the properties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) starch. Starch-Stärke 58(6):292–299
Zohuriaan-Mehr M, Omidian H, Doroudiani S, Kabiri K (2010) Advances in non-hygienic applications of superabsorbent hydrogel materials. J Mater Sci 45(21):5711–5735
Schoeck Jr VE, Fuller EE, Dubnik A (2002) Water-blocked telecommunications cables, and water-blocking yarns usefully employed in same. Google Patents
Gruhn JD, Shows PD, Fairgrieve SP, Watts JC (2001) Process for the preparation of nonwoven water blocking tapes and their use in cable manufacture. Google Patents
González K, García-Astrain C, Santamaria-Echart A, Ugarte L, Avérous L, Eceiza A, Gabilondo N (2018) Starch/graphene hydrogels via click chemistry with relevant electrical and antibacterial properties. Carbohydr Polym 202:372–381
Prabhakar R, Kumar D (2019) Studies on polyacrylate-starch/polyaniline conducting hydrogel. Curr Smart Mater 4(1):36–44
Akin F, Spraker M, Aly R, Leyden J, Raynor W, Landin W (2001) Effects of breathable disposable diapers: reduced prevalence of Candida and common diaper dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 18(4):282–290
Marcì G, Mele G, Palmisano L, Pulito P, Sannino A (2006) Environmentally sustainable production of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. Green Chem 8(5):439–444
Sannino A, Mensitieri G, Nicolais L (2004) Water and synthetic urine sorption capacity of cellulose-based hydrogels under a compressive stress field. J Appl Polym Sci 91(6):3791–3796
Bashari A, Rouhani Shirvan A, Shakeri M (2018) Cellulose-based hydrogels for personal care products. Polym Adv Technol 29(12):2853–2867
Haque MO, Mondal MIH (2019) Cellulose‐based hydrogel for personal hygiene applications. In: Cellulose‐based superabsorbent hydrogels. Springer, Switzerland, pp 1339–1359
Ma J, Li X, Bao Y (2015) Advances in cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. RSC Adv 5(73):59745–59757
Kabir SF, Sikdar PP, Haque B, Bhuiyan MR, Ali A, Islam M (2018) Cellulose-based hydrogel materials: chemistry, properties and their prospective applications. Prog Biomater 7(3):153–174
Alam MN, Christopher LP (2018) Natural cellulose-chitosan cross-linked superabsorbent hydrogels with superior swelling properties. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(7):8736–8742
Onofrei M, Filimon A (2016) Cellulose-based hydrogels: designing concepts, properties, and perspectives for biomedical and environmental applications. In: Polymer science: research advances, practical applications educational aspects, pp 108–120
Reshma G, Reshmi C, Nair SV, Menon D (2020) Superabsorbent sodium carboxymethyl cellulose membranes based on a new cross-linker combination for female sanitary napkin applications. Carbohydr Polym 248:116763
Barman A, Katkar PM, Asagekar SD (2018) Natural and sustainable raw materials for sanitary napkin. Man Made Text India 46(12):408–411
Bruce AH, Fogg GJ, Diedling FJ, Hammons JL (2003) System for selecting feminine hygiene products. Google Patents
Ilankoon I, Ghorbani Y, Chong MN, Herath G, Moyo T, Petersen J (2018) E-waste in the international context—a review of trade flows, regulations, hazards, waste management strategies and technologies for value recovery. Waste Manag 82:258–275
Majid A, Argue S (2001) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated solid wastes using agglomeration techniques. Miner Eng 14(11):1513–1525
Chantawong V, Harvey N, Bashkin V (2003) Comparison of heavy metal adsorptions by Thai kaolin and ballclay. Water Air Soil Pollut 148(1–4):111–125
Hageluken C (2006) Improving metal returns and eco-efficiency in electronics recycling—a holistic approach for interface optimisation between pre-processing and integrated metals smelting and refining. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 2006. IEEE, pp 218–223
Duffert C, Brune M, Prout K (2009) Background document on exposures to e-waste. World Health Organization, Geneva
Tsydenova O, Bengtsson M (2011) Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manag 31(1):45–58
Leyva-Ramos R, Rangel-Mendez J, Mendoza-Barron J, Fuentes-Rubio L, Guerrero-Coronado R (1997) Adsorption of cadmium(II) from aqueous solution onto activated carbon. Water Sci Technol 35(7):205–211
Shim J-W, Park S-J, Ryu S-K (2001) Effect of modification with HNO3 and NaOH on metal adsorption by pitch-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon 39(11):1635–1642
Ouki S, Neufeld R (1997) Use of activated carbon for the recovery of chromium from industrial wastewaters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol Int Res Process Environ Clean Technol 70(1):3–8
Monser L, Adhoum N (2002) Modified activated carbon for the removal of copper, zinc, chromium and cyanide from wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 26(2–3):137–146
Liu Z, Zhao C, Wang P, Zheng H, Sun Y, Dionysiou DD (2018) Removal of carbamazepine in water by electro-activated carbon fiber-peroxydisulfate: comparison, optimization, recycle, and mechanism study. Chem Eng J 343:28–36
Zhang J, Lin T, Chen W (2017) Micro-flocculation/sedimentation and ozonation for controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling in recycling of activated carbon filter backwash water. Chem Eng J 325:160–168
Singh B, Chauhan G, Bhatt S, Kumar K (2006) Metal ion sorption and swelling studies of psyllium and acrylic acid based hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 64(1):50–56
Lee J, Kumar R, Rozman H, Azemi B (2005) Pasting, swelling and solubility properties of UV initiated starch-graft-poly (AA). Food Chem 91(2):203–211
Güçlü G, Al E, Emik S, İyim TB, Özgümüş S, Özyürek M (2010) Removal of Cu2+ and Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions by starch-graft-acrylic acid/montmorillonite superabsorbent nanocomposite hydrogels. Polym Bull 65(4):333–346
Hashem A, Ahmad F, Fahad R (2008) Application of some starch hydrogels for the removal of mercury(II) ions from aqueous solutions. Adsorpt Sci Technol 26(8):563–579
Qi X, Wei W, Shen J, Dong W (2019) Salecan polysaccharide-based hydrogels and their applications: a review. J Mater Chem B 7(16):2577–2587
Ekebafe L, Ogbeifun D, Okieimen F (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous media using native cassava starch hydrogel. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 6(7):275–282
Pour ZS, Ghaemy M (2015) Removal of dyes and heavy metal ions from water by magnetic hydrogel beads based on poly (vinyl alcohol)/carboxymethyl starch-g-poly (vinyl imidazole). RSC Adv 5(79):64106–64118
Abdel-Aal S, Gad Y, Dessouki A (2006) Use of rice straw and radiation-modified maize starch/acrylonitrile in the treatment of wastewater. J Hazard Mater 129(1–3):204–215
Dai M, Liu Y, Ju B, Tian Y (2019) Preparation of thermoresponsive alginate/starch ether composite hydrogel and its application to the removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 294:122192
Chauhan K, Chauhan GS, Ahn J-H (2010) Novel polycarboxylated starch-based sorbents for Cu2+ ions. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(6):2548–2556
Yu C, Tang X, Liu S, Yang Y, Shen X, Gao C (2018) Laponite crosslinked starch/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels by freezing/thawing process and studying their cadmium ion absorption. Int J Biol Macromol 117:1–6
Chauhan GS, Jaswal SC, Verma M (2006) Post functionalization of carboxymethylated starch and acrylonitrile based networks through amidoximation for use as ion sorbents. Carbohydr Polym 66(4):435–443
Wang Q, Yang Z (2016) Industrial water pollution, water environment treatment, and health risks in China. Environ Pollut 218:358–365
Jana S, Pradhan S, Tripathy T (2018) Poly (N, N-dimethylacrylamide-co-acrylamide) grafted hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel: a useful Congo red dye remover. J Polym Environ 26(7):2730–2747
Ngwabebhoh FA, Gazi M, Oladipo AA (2016) Adsorptive removal of multi-azo dye from aqueous phase using a semi-IPN superabsorbent chitosan-starch hydrogel. Chem Eng Res Des 112:274–288
Christie RM (2007) Environmental aspects of textile dyeing. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
Nguyen TA, Juang R-S (2013) Treatment of waters and wastewaters containing sulfur dyes: a review. Chem Eng J 219:109–117
Saini RD (2017) Textile organic dyes: polluting effects and elimination methods from textile waste water. Int J Chem Eng Res 9:121–136
Rani B, Maheshwari R, Yadav R, Pareek D, Sharma A (2013) Resolution to provide safe drinking water for sustainability of future perspectives. Res J Chem Environ Sci 1:50–54
Seow TW, Lim CK (2016) Removal of dye by adsorption: a review. Int J Appl Eng Res 11(4):2675–2679
Vakili M, Rafatullah M, Salamatinia B, Abdullah AZ, Ibrahim MH, Tan KB, Gholami Z, Amouzgar P (2014) Application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater: a review. Carbohydr Polym 113:115–130
Gita S, Hussan A, Choudhury T (2017) Impact of textile dyes waste on aquatic environments and its treatment. Environ Ecol 35(3C):2349–2353
Wang S, Li H (2007) Kinetic modelling and mechanism of dye adsorption on unburned carbon. Dyes Pigments 72(3):308–314
Mohamed RR, Elella MHA, Sabaa MW, Saad GR (2018) Synthesis of an efficient adsorbent hydrogel based on biodegradable polymers for removing crystal violet dye from aqueous solution. Cellulose 25(11):6513–6529
Capanema NS, Mansur AA, Mansur HS, de Jesus AC, Carvalho SM, Chagas P, de Oliveira LC (2018) Eco-friendly and biocompatible cross-linked carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels as adsorbents for the removal of organic dye pollutants for environmental applications. Environ Technol 39(22):2856–2872
Hu T, Liu Q, Gao T, Dong K, Wei G, Yao J (2018) Facile preparation of tannic acid–poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate hydrogel beads for methylene blue removal from simulated solution. ACS Omega 3(7):7523–7531
Sami AJ, Khalid M, Iqbal S, Afzal M, Shakoori A (2017) Synthesis and application of chitosan-starch based nanocomposite in wastewater treatment for the removal of anionic commercial dyes. Pak J Zool 49(1):21–26
Katheresan V, Kansedo J, Lau SY (2018) Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 6(4):4676–4697
Mondal S (2008) Methods of dye removal from dye house effluent—an overview. Environ Eng Sci 25(3):383–396
Mittal AK, Venkobachar C (1993) Sorption and desorption of dyes by sulfonated coal. J Environ Eng 119(2):366–368
Kaşgöz H, Durmus A (2008) Dye removal by a novel hydrogel–clay nanocomposite with enhanced swelling properties. Polym Adv Technol 19(7):838–845
Bhattacharyya R, Ray SK (2014) Enhanced adsorption of synthetic dyes from aqueous solution by a semi-interpenetrating network hydrogel based on starch. J Ind Eng Chem 20(5):3714–3725
Zhu C, Xia Y, Zai Y, Dai Y, Liu X, Bian J, Liu Y, Liu J, Li G (2019) Adsorption and desorption behaviors of HPEI and thermoresponsive HPEI based gels on anionic and cationic dyes. Chem Eng J 369:863–873
Alkan M, Çelikçapa S, Demirbaş Ö, Doğan M (2005) Removal of reactive blue 221 and acid blue 62 anionic dyes from aqueous solutions by sepiolite. Dyes Pigments 65(3):251–259
Üzüm ÖB, Karadağ E (2006) A new sorbent chemically cross-linked highly swollen copolymeric hydrogels for dye uptake. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 45(12):1277–1283
Kundakci S, Öğüt HG, Üzüm ÖB, Karadağ E (2011) Equilibrium swelling characterization and dye uptake studies of acrylamide-co-methylenesuccinic acid hydrogels and semi-IPNs with PEG. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 50(9):947–956
Karadağ E, Kundakci S, Barış Üzüm Ö (2009) Water sorption and dye uptake studies of highly swollen AAm/AMPS hydrogels and semi-IPNs with PEG. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 48(12):1217–1229
Inbaraj BS, Chien J, Ho G, Yang J, Chen B (2006) Equilibrium and kinetic studies on sorption of basic dyes by a natural biopolymer poly (γ-glutamic acid). Biochem Eng J 31(3):204–215
Blackburn RS (2004) Natural polysaccharides and their interactions with dye molecules: applications in effluent treatment. Environ Sci Technol 38(18):4905–4909
Paulino AT, Guilherme MR, Reis AV, Campese GM, Muniz EC, Nozaki J (2006) Removal of methylene blue dye from an aqueous media using superabsorbent hydrogel supported on modified polysaccharide. J Colloid Interface Sci 301(1):55–62
Klimaviciute R, Riauka A, Zemaitaitis A (2007) The binding of anionic dyes by cross-linked cationic starches. J Polym Res 14(1):67–73
Delval F, Crini G, Morin N, Vebrel J, Bertini S, Torri G (2002) The sorption of several types of dye on crosslinked polysaccharides derivatives. Dyes Pigments 53(1):79–92
Ekici S, Güntekin G, Saraydın D (2011) The removal of textile dyes with cross-linked chitosan-poly (acrylamide) adsorbent hydrogels. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 50(12):1247–1255
Mahmoud GA, Abdel-Aal SE, Badway NA, Abo Farha SA, Alshafei EA (2014) Radiation synthesis and characterization of starch-based hydrogels for removal of acid dye. Starch-Stärke 66(3–4):400–408
Ilgin P, Ozay H, Ozay O (2020) The efficient removal of anionic and cationic dyes from aqueous media using hydroxyethyl starch-based hydrogels. Cellulose 27:4787–4802
Sharma G, Naushad M, Kumar A, Rana S, Sharma S, Bhatnagar A, Stadler FJ, Ghfar AA, Khan MR (2017) Efficient removal of Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 dye using starch/poly (alginic acid-cl-acrylamide) nanohydrogel. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:301–310
Hashem A, Abdel-Halim E, Sokker H (2007) Bi-functional starch composites prepared by γ-irradiation for removal of anionic and cationic dyes from aqueous solutions. Polym–Plast Technol Eng 46(1):71–77
Dhodapkar R, Rao N, Pande S, Nandy T, Devotta S (2007) Adsorption of cationic dyes on Jalshakti®, super absorbent polymer and photocatalytic regeneration of the adsorbent. React Funct Polym 67(6):540–548
Hameed B, El-Khaiary M (2008) Malachite green adsorption by Rattan sawdust: isotherm, kinetic and mechanism modeling. J Hazard Mater 159(2–3):574–579
Al-Aidy H, Amdeha E (2020) Green adsorbents based on polyacrylic acid–acrylamide grafted starch hydrogels: the new approach for enhanced adsorption of malachite green dye from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1711896
Abraham J, Rajasekharan Pillai V (1996) Membrane-encapsulated controlled-release urea fertilizers based on acrylamide copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci 60(13):2347–2351
Renken A, Hunkeler D (1999) Effect of the surfactant blend composition on the properties of polymerizing acrylamide-based inverse-emulsions: characterization by small-angle neutron scattering and quasi-elastic light scattering. Polymer 40(12):3545–3554
Jyothi A (2010) Starch graft copolymers: novel applications in industry. Compos Interfaces 17(2–3):165–174
Saroja N, Gowda L, Tharanathan R (2000) Chromatographic determination of residual monomers in starch-g-polyacrylonitrile and starch-g-polyacrylate. Chromatographia 51(5–6):345–348
Maharana T, Singh B (2006) Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyethylene by graft copolymerization of starch using glucose–Ce(IV) redox system. J Appl Polym Sci 100(4):3229–3239
Yao K, Wang M (1987) Synthesis of starch-g-polyacrylamide for oilfield drilling treatments. Oilfield Chem 4:175–179
Huang Y, Shen J (1995) Study on thickening ability of starch graft copolymers. Polym Mater Sci Eng 11:98–102
Guo J (1996) Synthesis and performance of heat-resistant and salt-tolerant filtrate loss reducer based on grafted starch. Oilfield Chem 13:169–171
Song H, Zhang S-F, Ma X-C, Wang D-Z, Yang J-Z (2007) Synthesis and application of starch-graft-poly (AM-co-AMPS) by using a complex initiation system of CS-APS. Carbohydr Polym 69(1):189–195
Kobayashi W, Otaka S, Nagai M (1990) Statistical demolition-facilitating agent. Google Patents
Mostafa KM, Morsy MS (2004) Tailoring a new sizing agent via structural modification of pregelled starch molecules part 1: carboxymethylation and grafting. Starch-Stärke 56(6):254–261
Mostafa KM, Samarkandy AR (2005) Synthesis of new thickener based on carbohydrate polymers for printing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes. JAPSC 5(7):1206–1213
Saboktakin MR, Maharramov A, Ramazanov MA (2009) pH-sensitive starch hydrogels via free radical graft copolymerization, synthesis and properties. Carbohydr Polym 77(3):634–638
Chang A (2015) pH-sensitive starch-g-poly (acrylic acid)/sodium alginate hydrogels for controlled release of diclofenac sodium. Iran Polym J 24(2):161–169
Poorgholy N, Massoumi B, Jaymand M (2017) A novel starch-based stimuli-responsive nanosystem for theranostic applications. Int J Biol Macromol 97:654–661
Su X, Xiao C, Hu C (2018) Facile preparation and dual responsive behaviors of starch-based hydrogel containing azo and carboxylic groups. Int J Biol Macromol 115:1189–1193
Dragan ES, Apopei DF (2013) Multiresponsive macroporous semi-IPN composite hydrogels based on native or anionically modified potato starch. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):23–32
Wang Y, Zhao F, Wang J, Li L, Zhang K, Shi Y, Gao Y, Guo X (2019) Tungsten-doped VO2/starch derivative hybrid nanothermochromic hydrogel for smart window. Nanomaterials 9(7):970
Xiao C, You R, Fan Y, Zhang Y (2016) Tunable functional hydrogels formed from a versatile water-soluble chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 85:386–390
Guilherme MR, Oliveira RS, Mauricio MR, Cellet TS, Pereira GM, Kunita MH, Muniz EC, Rubira AF (2012) Albumin release from a brain-resembling superabsorbent magnetic hydrogel based on starch. Soft Matter 8(24):6629–6637
Dong D, Li J, Cui M, Wang J, Zhou Y, Luo L, Wei Y, Ye L, Sun H, Yao F (2016) In situ “clickable” zwitterionic starch-based hydrogel for 3D cell encapsulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(7):4442–4455
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qamruzzaman, M., Ahmed, F. & Mondal, M.I.H. An Overview on Starch-Based Sustainable Hydrogels: Potential Applications and Aspects. J Polym Environ 30, 19–50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02180-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02180-9