Abstract
Health status prediction is of great significance for a motor system’s safe operation and lifecycle management. The object of this work is to achieve better information fusion performance for information obtained from X-, Y-, and Z-axial and existed in the multi-feature parameter, and therefore gain more comprehensively and effectively prediction results of health status. First, a UAV power motor is chosen as the test item to obtain the original vibration data. Then, the multi-feature parameters are fused and chosen based on quality and quantity method considering the diagnosis results and degradation path descriptive ability. Next, the health status prediction is achieved with Bayesian updating algorithm. Finally, a DS theory and information entropy weight-based granulation fusion method of multi-source health status information for the electric motor is proposed. The method can achieve the fusion of multiple prediction results obtained from multi-feature parameters to gain the optimal health status prediction result for the motor. The result is compared with actual data and also verified by information entropy. Meanwhile, according to the prediction results, its application in risk assessment and maintenance planning were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
With the development of industrial technology, motor products have been widely applied in emerging and traditional areas. To reduce the harm of motor faults, increase the system’s safe operation, economic efficiency, and lifecycle operational capability, it is increasingly urgent to accurately acquire and anticipate a motor’s health status. For bulleted lists.
The key solution of the foregoing problems is to accurately extract health-related features from the signal of motor. Vibration signals are the most effective one due to the extensive and mature information it contains [1]. So, it has considerable applications, including time-domain-analysis-based methods (involving parameters such as mean, variance, mean–variance, peak value, skewness, kurtosis, and waveform [2], frequency-domain-analysis-based methods (involving parameters such as gravity frequency, mean-square frequency, and frequency variance [2], as well as the Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) based on time–frequency-domain analysis [2, 3]. Different feature-extraction methods reflect product health status from different aspects, which both intersect and complement with each other. The fusion of information from different feature-extraction methods can be realized using principal component analysis (PCA) [4], kernel PCA [5], neighborhood components analysis (NCA) [6], and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [7], etc. However, multi-feature parameters usually exist while fusing information without sacrificing useful ones. Meanwhile, the existing health status prediction methods mainly include physical models [8], the nonlinear degradation model [9, 10], Neural Network and Bayesian network model [11]. Predicting the health status of the motor, most researchers are based on uniaxial information [12, 13] or reduce a multiaxial status to an equivalent uniaxial one [14]. While a motor’s vibration signal obtained from the X, Y, and Z axes are somewhat different, but also displays intersectionality and complementarity. Ignoring such information may cause accuracy loss of prediction results. Therefore, information extracted from X-, Y-, and Z-axial and the effective utilization of multi-feature parameters information are both considered in this paper to obtain more accurate and more useful health-related information of motor. The technical flowchart is shown in Fig. 1
First, we design a lifetime test on an electric motor to obtain the original vibration data gained from X-, Y-, and Z-axial. Second, we conducted feature-extraction methods on the original data and fused the multi-feature information based on quality and quantity method considering the diagnosis results and degradation path descriptive ability to obtain the feature parameters of X-, Y-, and Z-axial for health state prediction. Third, health status prediction model is built using Bayesian updating algorithm based on the obtained parameters and prediction results are got accordingly. Next, known from the ability to fuse information from multiple sources of DS theory [15, 16], a health status information granulation fusion method for the electric motor is proposed by combining DS theory, Fuzzy theory and Information entropy. The proposed method considers the information from X-, Y-, and Z-axial and can achieve the fusion of multiple prediction results which obtained from multi-feature parameters to gain the optimal health status prediction result for the motor.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: the test motor, experimental process, and data are introduced in Sect. 2. The multi-feature information is fused in Sect. 3. The prediction model and multi-sensor information fusion method are described in Sect. 4. In Sect. 5, examples of the application of predicted results in risk assessment and maintenance planning are given. Section 6 concludes the paper.
2 Experiment and Original Data
To obtain the vibration signal from three axials during the life cycle of electric motor, a set of test system is established. A T-MOTOR U8 brushless DC motor (which used in multi-rotor UAVs) was chosen as the test object. The test system is shown in Fig. 2. The control program of the upper computer was realized by LabVIEW (2014) software, and the control of the electronic governor by the lower computer was accomplished using a Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) signal. The vibration signals of X, Y, and Z axes were collected by an accelerometer and transmitted to the computer for monitoring and storage.
The degeneration test lasted for 1062 h. The sample ran stable for 0–1017 h. Characteristic quantity during 1018–1062 h exhibited a sudden change in amplitude (as shown in Fig. 3), which continued to occur without any tendency to decrease or disappear. Bearing wear and motor fault were proved after sample testing as shown in Fig. 4 [17].
3 Feature Extraction and Fusion
3.1 Feature Extraction
The objective of feature extraction is to obtain a motor’s status feature information hidden in the vibration signals for status diagnosis, and, thereafter, to carry out the status prediction accordingly. Common feature-extraction methods are based on time-domain analysis, frequency-domain analysis, and time–frequency-domain analysis, each of which focuses on different aspects.
In this section, 9 methods based on time-domain analysis(include mean, variance, root mean square, peak value, skewness, kurtosis, pulse, margin, and waveform) [2], 3 methods based on frequency-domain-analysis(include gravity frequency, mean-square frequency, and frequency variance) [2], and 1 method based on time–frequency-domain analysis (HHT), are selected to extract the original data of the motor degeneration experiment in Sect. 2 to obtain the corresponding status feature parameter. Taking the kurtosis, gravity frequency, and HHT method as examples, the extracted status feature parameters are shown in Fig. 5.
According to the data, a motor’s general condition, to a certain extent, can be described by the status feature parameters obtained using different feature-extraction methods. However, the details embodied in the information are slightly different, and the status of the motor is explained from only one aspect.
3.2 Multiple Feature Information Fusion
Currently, the methods of multi-feature information fusion commonly applied to motors or similar products are PCA [4], kernel PCA [5], NCA [6], and LDA [7], which have been usually used for motor fault diagnosis. However, selecting the method of motor status prediction is slightly different from that of fault diagnosis. The method should effectively distinguish the states of motor degeneration and well describe the degeneration process. Therefore, PCA, kernel PCA, NCA, and LDA methods were applied to the feature fusion of actual data and the first and second principal components derived from each method are chosen. Then, the results of which were analysed to select the most suitable method.
Since the X- and Y-axial data are similar, mainly the X- and Z-axial data are described. In this paper, the first two feature parameters fused using PCA, kernel PCA, NCA, and LDA methods were studied, since the main feature information can be covered with 2 feature parameters obtained by the fusion of multi-feature information. The results are shown in Figs. 6 and 7.
It can be seen from Fig. 6a, the health-fault status of motor can be effectively distinguished by PCA, Kernel PCA, LDA method for X-axial data. As for Z-axial data PCA, Kernel PCA, NCA methods are proved useful (see Fig. 7a). Then, Cluster evaluation index D is introduced to make a quantitative evaluation of the above methods and utilize the effective one to further conduct multi-feature information fusion. The Cluster evaluation index D can be written as:
Where \( S_{{w_{1} }} \) and \( S_{{w_{2} }} \) is the within-class scatter matrix of the sample of health and fault status [18], respectively, which denotes the dispersion of the mean of the sample points in each state. \( tr\left( {S_{{w_{1} }} } \right) \) and \( tr\left( {S_{{w_{2} }} } \right) \) are the trace of the scatter matrix which denotes the aggregation of the sample (the smaller the better). \( S_{b} \) is the between-class scatter matrix of the sample of health and fault status which denote the distribution of each state sample in space. It can be given as:
Where \( P(i) \) and \( \vec{M}_{i} \) are the prior probabilities and the Mean vector of the sample of class i state, respectively. \( \vec{M}_{0} \) is the overall mean vector of all C class state samples \( \left( {\vec{M}_{0} { = }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{c} {P(i)\vec{M}_{i} } } \right) \). \( tr(S_{b} ) \) is the trace of scattering matrix between two class state samples which denotes the distribution of each state sample (the bigger the better). Therefore, the smaller the Cluster evaluation index D of the health-fault state is, the better distinguish performance the dimensionality reduction method can achieve over the health-fault status of the motor. The Cluster evaluation indexes of Figs. 6a and 7a are shown in Table 1.
Known from Table 1, LDA method achieves the best distinguish performance in quantity. And as one can see in Fig. 6b, LDA methods can better describe the degeneration trajectory and have less volatility compare to PCA and kernel PCA methods. Hence, the LDA method was used for X- and Y-axial data, and similarly the NCA method for Z-axial data, thus realizing the fusion of multi-feature information. The obtained feature parameters were then used to predict the motor’s health status.
4 Health Status Prediction Through Multi-sensors
4.1 Prediction Method Based on Bayesian Updating Method
The status degeneration models mainly include regression-based [19], random process-based [20, 21], machine-learning-based [22], and failure physics-based models [23], which were used to construct the degeneration model of feature parameters in accordance with the product’s actual condition. In this paper, the Wiener process model is utilized to build the degradation model which can be expressed as [24]:
where Y(t) denotes the degeneration process of feature parameters; B(t) denotes the standard Brownian motion, B(t)–N(0, t); σ denotes the diffusion coefficient; y0 denotes the initial value of feature-parameter degeneration; and d(s) denotes the drift coefficient, which is a function of stress and reflects the product’s degeneration rate. If l is the failure threshold of the feature parameters, the product will cease to be effective when y(t) − l<0. The time (t) that y(t) passes through l for the first time is subject to inverse Gaussian distribution, so the distribution of health status probability is as follows:
In the prediction model, accuracy drops with increasing distance. Therefore, Bayesian theory was applied to the reconstruction of the prediction process, as well as the update and fusion of historical data and new data, so that the model can be updated in real time with the actual data, thereby ensuring a high prediction accuracy (as shown in Fig. 8, the prediction accuracy keeps on a higher level due to the update).
Three kinds of information are included in Bayesian theory, namely the general, sample, and prior information. According to the nature of the Wiener process, the degeneration increment Δy in unit time Δt is subject to normal distribution with the mean value of d(s)Δt and the variance of σ2Δt; that is,
Therefore, formula (5) is the general information, p(θ), where θ is the parameter of the model, i.e., d(s) and σ. If the number of data is n in total, the latest m data can be defined as the sample information y2, and the former n − m data as the prior information. The corresponding Bayesian formula of y1 is as follows:
As the sample information y2 is obtained, it can be inferred that
This means that the posterior distribution of θ under y1 plays the role of the prior distribution of θ under y2. If the expression of d(s) is d(s) = exp[A − B/s], the posterior distribution of formula (1) can be expressed as follows:
Where A and B are the two model parameters in the model d(s), their values can be obtained by the motor degradation data. For the posterior distribution model, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was used to infer the parameters to obtain the assessed value of parameters d(s) and σ. Then, the health status of product at each time was predicted using formula (4). The specific update process is shown in Fig. 9. Next, based on the above method, the modeling of each axial parameter and each feature parameter was carried out. Finally, using all the characteristics in chapter 3.2, the health status probability is calculated and demonstrated in Fig. 10.
4.2 Multi Sensor Health State Information Granulation Fusion Method Based on Information Entropy Weight
According to Sect. 4, a motor’s future health status can be predicted based on the feature parameters of the X, Y, and Z axes extracted and fused in Sect. 3. The prediction results given by different information sources provide evidence for a motor’s future status from different perspectives, but it is not able to describe the entire picture of the incident, as there are some limitations in the above evidence. How to effectively fuse the above evidence is the key to making an effective prediction and the obtaining accurate prediction results. In this respect, DS theory is an effective solution to the uncertainty caused by randomness and ambiguity, so it was used for the fusion of three-axial information.
DS theory has two main characteristics. First, it provides a more flexible approach to describe uncertainty than probability theory (basic belief assignment function). Second, it also provides a combination rule for combining different items of evidence.
4.2.1 Basic Belief Assignment Function and Combination Rule
Θ is set as a finite non-empty set of elements that are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, which is called as a recognition framework. Any proposition A belongs to the set 2Θ. In 2Θ, the basic belief assignment function m (mass function) can be defined as 2Θ → [0,1], which satisfies
m(A) is recognized as the basic belief assignment function of event A. Here, \( \phi \) is an empty set. m(A) represents the degree of full support for proposition A, and can also be referred to as the degree of precise belief of proposition A.
For the same recognition framework Θ, if the evidence of the basic belief assignment functions m1, m2, …, mn from n different information sources is E1, E2, …, En, respectively, it can be inferred that
where
K can be used as a measure of the contradiction degree among the data sources. The larger K is, the more intensive the contradiction of evidence. The coefficient 1/(1 − K) is called the regularization factor, the function of which is to avoid assigning non-zero trust to the empty set Ф during synthesis.
4.2.2 Fuzzy Granulated Description of Health State
To effectively describe the status of the motor, three propositions A, B, and C existing in the recognition framework Θ are defined, among which A represents that the motor is in good status, B a recession status, and C a near-failure status. Fuzzy theory is adopted to define the basic belief assignment function. By selecting appropriate fuzzy numbers, the entire decreasing process of health status is divided. In addition, the corresponding fuzzy membership functions are given, including the common fuzzy numbers, such as triangular, trapezoidal, bell-shaped fuzzy numbers, etc. The triangular fuzzy numbers are adopted in this study to define the basic belief assignment function under each status. If there are n feature parameters y1, y2, …, yn in the three axes of the motor, the probability models of their health status are H1(t), H2(t), …, Hn(t), respectively. With the health status Hb as an example, the membership degree of the motor in proposition B is \( \tilde{\mu }_{B} \left( H \right) = 1 \). As H(t) gradually changes towards Ha or Hc, the probability of belonging to this status is reduced to zero and its corresponding membership function is
For propositions A, B, and C, their trapezoidal membership functions can be defined as (Fig. 11):
At a certain time point, the relationship among the membership degrees of the motor under each status, \( \tilde{\mu }_{\nu } \left( {H_{i} } \right) \, \left( {\nu = A,B,C} \right) \), is
On this basis, according to the construction principle of evidence, the information provided by n kinds of feature parameters at time t was taken as n kinds of evidence in DS theory, represented by mt1, mt2, …, mtn. In this case, the corresponding basic probability assignment function is
4.2.3 Evidence Combination Based on Information Entropy Weight
Because the credibility of information contained in each evidence is different, we endowed with information entropy weight to each feature parameter to make more accurate and effective use of source information. Since Entropy originates from statistical thermodynamics which is an expression of the disorder, or randomness of a system. Its increase often corresponds to an increase in the disorder of system. In information theory, entropy is the measure to define the uncertainty of random variable value and it is sometimes referred as Shannon entropy, If X represents a random variable, and the probability when X equals x is p(x), the information entropy of X, E(X), is defined as:
Thus, information entropy can be the basis of weight assignment. The information entropy of feature parameter of X-, Y-, and Z-axial is shown in Table 2. Take A status as example, the information entropy of its feature parameter can be calculated by:
Then, adjust the distribution function of the credibility based on weight. Which is:
where \( w_{\hbox{max} } \) is the maximum value of all feature parameters under all status. Next, we can adjust the evidence with less weight.
4.2.4 Results Analysis
After the fusion of the frame combination using DS theory, the motor’s health status D combining 6 kinds of three-axial parameter information was obtained. Its basic probability assignment function at time t is
Based on the above method, the fusion of X-, Y-, and Z-axial information was carried out. Evidence of all information sources was combined to obtain the probability function of a motor in good condition (status A), which is as shown in Fig. 12.
Figure 12a is the confidence distribution function of a motor in good condition obtained by multi-feature parameters. Figure 12b is the confidence distribution function after fusion (namely the probability of a motor being in good condition).
A motor’s health status function Hi(t), i = A, B, C (as shown in Fig. 13) was obtained by the fusion of probability functions of motor health status acquired by multi-feature parameters using the proposed method. As shown in Fig. 13, B status meets its peak value at 829 h and then gradually reduces. C status reaches 0.5 at 892 h (the sum of the value of A status and B status) and reaches 0.9 at 1071 h. by that time point the failure status is reached with a high probability for motor. So, one can infer that the status transition point of motor is between 892 h and 1071 h which is matched with test result (1018 h).
Furthermore, information entropy method is conducted to verify the effect of the proposed method by assessing the information of multi-feature parameter calculated above. Table 3 shows the obtained information entropies of the multi-sensor fusion parameter (the proposed method).
As seen in Tables 2 and 3, the proposed method owes the least information entropy, so we can see the proposed method is more credible since it can integrate multi-source information while reduce information uncertainty.
5 Application of Prediction Results in Safety and Maintenance
5.1 Risk Assessment
Based on the prediction results, the dynamic risk assessment of the system was realized in accordance with the motor’s probability of being in different states, thereby guiding the formulation of relevant safety decisions in a timely and effective manner.
Known from the property of basic quantitative risk assessment which describe risk with risk severity and risk probability, the risk value of the motor at each state can be assessed [25]. According to the prediction results given in Sect. 4, the motor’s statuses (Fig. 13) can be divided into three risk levels, also named the severity of the risk, and can be shown in Fig. 14. The risk probability is related to health status. Therefore, the assessed risk value of the motor at each state can be calculated. The risk value of motor is shown in Fig. 15.
5.2 Maintenance Planning
Motor maintenance planning can be carried out in accordance with the health status functions HA(t), HB(t), and HC(t). If the near-failure status function HC(t) is taken as the criterion by which motor failure is determined, with given preventive maintenance cost Cp and corrective maintenance cost Cc, the preventive maintenance cost TC(Tp) at time Tp is [26]:
the expected lifecycle L (Tp) is expressed as
and the cost per unit time EC(Tp) is expressed as
where M(Tp) denotes the timeframe of the failure period estimated by the truncated expected value of the failure distribution at Tp, which is expressed as
where c(t) denotes the failure probability density function and C(Tp) the cumulative failure probability of the motor at Tp.
By optimizing the preventive maintenance time Tp, the optimal preventive maintenance cost per unit time EC(Tp) at Tp can be obtained, and the corresponding Tp is the preventive maintenance time corresponding to the minimum maintenance cost. It is known that the preventive maintenance cost Cp of this motor is 1000 CNY and that the corrective maintenance cost Cc is 7000 CNY, which includes the cost of motor and potential loss.
Figure 16a shows the relationship between the motor’s preventive maintenance time Tp and the total maintenance cost TC(Tp). The probability of motor failure has been gradually increasing since the 558th hour. The relationship between the motor’s preventive maintenance time Tp and the maintenance cost per unit time EC(Tp) is shown in Fig. 16b. In the early stage, the dominant factor for EC(Tp) is the motor’s expected lifecycle L(Tp), so EC(Tp) decreases with time. After 852 h, the corrective maintenance cost Cc caused by failure becomes the dominant factor for EC(Tp), so EC(Tp) increases gradually with increasing failure function value C(t). In other words, it grows with time. Therefore, the motor’s preventive maintenance cost per unit time EC(Tp) reaches the minimum at the 852nd hour, which is 1.261 CNY/h.
6 Conclusions
In order to acquire motor health status information more comprehensively and effectively and solve the information fusion problems between X-, Y-, and Z-axial information and multi-feature parameter information of motor. This paper takes a UAV power motor as the test item and studies this problem with its life cycle vibration data. The problem is solved based on quality and quantity method considering the diagnosis results and degradation path descriptive ability. Then, the health status prediction is achieved with Bayesian updating algorithm. Next, a DS theory and information entropy weight-based health status information granulation fusion method for the electric motor is proposed to fuse information obtained from the X-, Y-, and Z-axial. The method can achieve the fusion of multiple prediction results obtained from multi-feature parameters to gain the optimal health status prediction result for the motor. The analysis results show that the prediction results are in conformity with the actual situation, and the proposed method is more credible since it can integrate the multi-source information while reducing information uncertainty. Meanwhile, according to the prediction results, its application in risk assessment and maintenance planning were discussed, which indicates that it can be used as data support for lifecycle management, thereby ensuring the high reliability, safety, and economic efficiency of motor products and their systems. However, given the limited amount of experimental data in this paper, the details of this method should be optimized gradually with the expansion of sample size. Moreover, the implementation of the proposed method will also be affected by different motor types and sensor-assembly methods, which will be studied in follow-up research.
References
Deng, L., Zhao, R.: A vibration analysis method based on hybrid techniques and its application to rotating machinery. Measurement 46(9), 3671–3682 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.07.014
Xiao, Y., Ding, E., Chen, C., Liu, X., Li, L.: A novel characteristic frequency bands extraction method for automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on Hilbert–Huang transform. Sensors 15(11), 27869–27893 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s151127869
Chen, B.Y., Li, H.R., Yu, H., Wang, Y.K.: A hybrid domain degradation feature extraction method for motor bearing based on distance evaluation technique. Int. J. Rotating Mach. 22(2017), 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2607254
Jiang, W., Xie, C., Zhuang, M., Shou, Y., Tang, Y.: Sensor data fusion with Z-numbers and its application in fault diagnosis. Sensors 16(9), 1509 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091509
Yin, Y., Liu, F., Zhou, X., Li, Q.Z.: An efficient data compression model based on spatial clustering and principal component analysis in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 15(8), 19443–19465 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s150819443
Widodo, A., Yang, B.S.: Application of nonlinear feature extraction and support vector machines for fault diagnosis of induction motors. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(1), 241–250 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.020
Zhou, H.T., Chen, J., Dong, G.M., Wang, H.C., Yuan, H.D.: Bearing fault recognition method based on neighbourhood component analysis and coupled hidden markov model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66–67, 568–581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.037
Djeziri, M.A., Benmoussa, S., Sanchez, R.: Hybrid method for remaining useful life prediction in wind turbine systems. Renew. Energy 116, 173–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.020
Wu, Z.R., Li, X., Fang, L., et al.: Multiaxial fatigue life prediction based on nonlinear continuum damage mechanics and critical plane method. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 27(6), 3144–3152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s1166501730454
Wang, Z.Q., Hu, C.H., Fan, H.D.: Real-time remaining useful life prediction for a nonlinear degrading system in service: application to bearing data. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 23(1), 211–222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2017.2666199
Lin, J., Su, L., Yan, Y., et al.: Prediction method for power transformer running state based on LSTM_DBN network. Energies 11(7), 1880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071880
Wang, Y.S., Ma, Q.H., Zhu, Q., Liu, X.T., Zhao, L.H.: An intelligent approach for engine fault diagnosis based on Hilbert–Huang transform and support vector machine. Appl. Acoust. 75(1), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.07.001
Climente-Alarcon, V., Antonino-Daviu, J.A., Strangas, E.G., Riera-Guasp, M.: Rotor-bar breakage mechanism and prognosis in an induction motor. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 62(3), 1814–1825 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/demped.2013.6645775
Braccesi, C., Morettini, G., Cianetti, F., et al.: Development of a new simple energy method for life prediction in multiaxial fatigue. Int. J. Fatigue 112, 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.00
Rong, P.: A bayes approach to reliability prediction utilizing data from accelerated life tests and field failure observations. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 25(2), 229–240 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.964
Otman, B., Yuan, X.H.: Engine fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. Inf. Fusion 8(4), 379–386 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2005.07.003
Wang, X., He, Y., Wang, L.: Study on mutual information and fractal dimension-based unsupervised feature parameters selection: application in UAVs. Entropy 20(9), 674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090674
Michael, M., Lin, W.C.: Experimental study of information measure and inter-intra class distance ratios on feature selection and orderings. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3(2), 172–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1973.5408500
Xue, X., Zhou, J.: A hybrid fault diagnosis approach based on mixed-domain state features for rotating machinery. ISA Trans. 66, 284–295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2016.10.014
Deng, A.M., Chen, X., Zhang, C.H., Wang, Y.S.: Reliability assessment based on performance degradation data. J. Astronaut. 27(3), 546–552 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-1328.2006.03.044
Whitmore, G.A., Schenkelberg, F.: Modelling accelerated degradation data using Wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation. Lifetime Data Anal. 3(1), 27–45 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009664101413
Bagdonavicius, V., Nikulin, M.S.: Estimation in degradation models with explanatory variables. Lifetime Data Anal. 7(1), 85–103 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009629311100
Liu, H.M., Lv, C., Ouyang, P.C., Wang, S.: Helicopter rotor tuning based on neural network and particle swarm optimization. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 37(3), 283–288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2011.03.015
Jin, G., Matthews, D., Fan, Y., Liu, Q.: Physics of failure-based degradation modeling and lifetime prediction of the momentum wheel in a dynamic covariate environment. Eng. Fail. Anal. 28(3), 222–240 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.027
Luo, Y.: Safety Economics, 2nd edn. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing (2010)
Márquez, A.C.: The Maintenance Management Framework, 1st edn. Springer, London (2007)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Strategic Priority Research Program (Class A) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Project No. XDA14000000) and by the Aero-Science Fund (Grant No. 2015ZD51044).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Sun, Y., He, Y. et al. Motor Health Status Prediction Method Based on Information from Multi-sensor and Multi-feature Parameters. J Nondestruct Eval 38, 46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0587-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0587-4