Abstract
The Casimir effect is discussed via an HMO treatment. At this schematic theoretical level, the Casimir effect might be considered as the result of the general quantum mechanical interaction behavior of two sets of particles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the present author’s first paper [1] a model to naively study chemisorption was proposed, which, with the appropriate modifications, happens that can be applied to study, in a naïve way too, the Casimir effect [2].
Casimir effect is still nowadays explained via a more physical way using the nature of vacuum fluctuations, see for example reference [3], or via van der Waals forces [4]. There is a large amount of literature on the subject, see for a very small set of references [5,6,7], for general reviews on the subject nature and applications [8, 9], and finally, a contemporary comprehensive discussion [10] shall be recommended. The present work is having to be considered nearer to the second option than to the first.
2 Problem set up
Suppose two equal sets of N atoms are separated by an arbitrary distance.
Each atomic set might be associated with some HMO \(\left( {N \times N} \right)\) matrix \({{\mathbb{M}}}_{o}\).
The structure of such matrix is irrelevant, except knowing that there exists an orthogonal matrix \({\mathbb{U}}\) of the same dimension fulfilling:
\({\mathbb{U}}^{T} {\mathbb{U}} = {\mathbb{UU}}^{T} = {\mathbb{I}}\),
and such that diagonalizes \(\mathbb{M}_{o}\):
with:
holding the eigenvalues of \({\mathbb{M}}_{o}\), its spectrum.
One can also suppose that the pair of non-interacting atomic sets correspond to an essentially doubly degenerate spectrum.
3 Casimir interaction
Casimir-like interaction between the two atomic sets can be associated with an HMO matrix \(\left( {2{\text{N}} \times 2{\text{N}}} \right)\), which can be partitioned preserving the Hückel topological matrix style as:
where \(\sigma\) is a scalar and \({\mathbb{I}}\) a unit matrix of the appropriate dimension \(\left( {{\text{N}} \times {\text{N}}} \right).\) The scalar \(\sigma\), which can be called the Casimir resonance integral, corresponds to a factor that makes the usual HMO resonance integral \(\beta\) smaller, such that to explicitly consider a large distance separating both atomic sets in a given Casimir experiment; that is: \(\sigma \ll \beta\).
4 Transformation of the casimir interaction matrix
Now one can scale the HMO composite matrix \({\mathbb{A}}_{o}\) to obtain a new equivalent matrix:
\({\mathbb{A}} = \sigma^{ - 1} {\mathbb{A}}_{o} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sigma^{ - 1} {\mathbb{M}}_{o} } & {\mathbb{I}} \\ {\mathbb{I}} & {\sigma^{ - 1} {\mathbb{M}}_{o} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathbb{M}} & {\mathbb{I}} \\ {\mathbb{I}} & {\mathbb{M}} \\ \end{array} } \right)\).
And one can define a composite orthogonal hyperdiagonal matrix:
\({\mathbb{V}} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathbb{U}} & \mathbb{0} \\ {\mathbb{0}} & {\mathbb{U}} \\ \end{array} } \right) \Rightarrow {\mathbb{V}}^{T} {\mathbb{V}} = {\mathbb{VV}}^{T} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathbb{I}} & {\mathbb{0}} \\ {\mathbb{0}} & {\mathbb{I}} \\ \end{array} } \right),\)
where \({\mathbb{0}}\) is the zero matrix of the appropriate dimension. With such a definition one can easily see that a new transformed matrix \({\mathbb{Z}}\) can be computed:
where \({\mathbb{D}}\) is a diagonal matrix containing the eigenvalue spectrum of the matrix \({\mathbb{A}}\); in fact, it is trivial to consider:
\({\mathbb{D}} = \sigma^{ - 1} {\mathbb{D}}_{o}\).
The matrix \({\mathbb{Z}}\) is some kind of symmetric pseudotridiagonal matrix, where the subdiagonals are at the positions of the upper triangle:
and the associated symmetrical lower triangle is constructed accordingly.
5 Eigensystem spectrum of the casimir interaction
The Casimir interaction pseudotridiagonal matrix \({\mathbb{Z}}\) can be easily transformed into a diagonal matrix by the orthogonal transformation matrix:
\({\mathbb{E}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt 2 }\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\mathbb{I}} & { - {\mathbb{I}}} \\ {\mathbb{I}} & {\mathbb{I}} \\ \end{array} } \right),\)
considering that the matrix \({\mathbb{E}}\) is orthogonal because:
such that acting over \({\mathbb{Z}}\), yields an hyperdiagonal matrix:
The meaning of this result indicates that from the initial non-interacting double degenerate spectrum of the two sets of atomic structures, one can obtain a total Casimir interaction spectrum, which is split into two spectral sets, with a gap of 2 between the respective eigenvalues:
6 Possible fluctuation of the casimir interaction energy
The total energy of the Casimir HMO interaction will reflect the eigenvalue gap discussed in the previous section. This is so because the non-interacting energy associated with the two sets can be expressed as:
while the interacting Casimir atomic sets will present total energy in the ground state, expressible with the equation:
where the term \(\lambda = 2N\sigma\) might be taken as a parameter, considering the number of doubly occupied monoelectronic levels in units of the Casimir resonance integral.
However, one shall also take into consideration the possibility that another state can be attained by the Casimir system, that is:
\({\text{E}}_{T}^{\left( - \right)} = {\text{E}}_{oT} - 2{\text{N}}\sigma\)
It seems plausible that, due to the small nature of the Casimir interaction parameter \(\sigma\), the correction \(\pm \lambda\) becomes also sufficiently small, to allow some fluctuation between the two states \(\left\{ {E_{T}^{\left( + \right)} ;\,E_{T}^{\left( - \right)} } \right\}\).
7 Conclusion
It has been shown that the schematic HMO theory can provide a purely theoretical reason for a plausible explanation of the Casimir effect existence.
According to the present discussion and results, which one must be aware of are grounded on a quantum mechanical point of view, two twin sets of atoms, independently of their cardinality, even if separated at large distances, suffer an electronic energy splitting, similar to the one, which is well described in LCAO MO theory, when two hydrogen atoms interact.
Such behavior that can be associated with varied systems, from metallic plates up to swarms of particles, perhaps can be somehow connected with the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox [11], via the present author works [12, 13].
Finally, a recent experimental discussion [14] might be also linked with the present simple theoretical result.
References
J. Molina, R. Carbó, Cálculo teórico del calor de quimisorción del hidrógeno sobre metales. Afinidad 22, 101–107 (1965)
H.B.G. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. Proc. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793–795 (1948)
R. Jaffe, “Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum.” Phys Rev. D 72, 021301 (2005)
H.B.G. Casimir, D. Polder, The influence of retardation on the london-van der waals forces. Phys. Rev. 73, 360–372 (1948)
A.W. Rodriguez, F. Capasso, S.G. Johnson, The Casimir effect in microstructured geometries. Nat. Photonics 5, 211–221 (2011)
M.T.H. Reid, J. White, S.G. Johnson, Computation of Casimir interactions between arbitrary three-dimensional objects with arbitrary material properties. Phys Rev A 84, 010503 (2011)
L. Tang, M. Wang, C.Y. Ng, M. Nikolic, C.T. Chan, A.W. Rodriguez, H.B. Chan, Measurement of non-monotonic casimir forces between silicon nanostructures. Nat. Photonics 11, 97–101 (2017)
M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, V.M. Mostepanenko, New developments in the casimir effect. Phys. Rep. 353, 1–205 (2001)
A. Stange, D.K. Campbell, D.J. Bishop, Science and technology of the casimir effect. Phys. Today 74, 42–48 (2021)
T. Gong, M.R. Corrado, A.R. Mahbub, Sh. Calum, J.N. Munday, Recent progress in engineering the casimir effect – applications to nanophotonics, nanomechanics, and chemistry. Nanophotonics 10, 523–556 (2021)
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
R. Carbó-Dorca, On einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox. J. Math. Chem. 41, 209–215 (2006)
J. Chang, R. Carbó-Dorca, A quantum similarity discussion about Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox in gaussian enfolded spaces. J. Math. Chem. 58, 1815–1827 (2020)
D. Pérez-Morelo, A. Stange, R. W. Lally, L. K. Barrett, M. Imboden, D. K. Campbell, V. A. Aksyuk, D. J. Bishop; “Searching for the Casimir Energy” arXiv:2004.13771 [physics.app-ph] (2020).
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Carbó-Dorca, R. A naïve HMO study of the casimir effect. J Math Chem 60, 581–585 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-021-01323-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-021-01323-6