The Einstein–Podolsy–Rosen (EPR) paradox is analyzed. Here is shown that, when EPR wavefunctions are submitted to reasonable normalization and the reference frames rotated by unitary transformations, the EPR paradox disapears.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935). Phys. Rev 47:777
Bohm D. (1952). Phys. Rev 85:166
Bohm D. (1952). Phys. Rev 85:180
Bohm D., Aharonov Y. (1957). Phys. Rev 108:1070
Shi Y.H., Sergienko A.V., Rubin M.H. (1993). Phys. Rev. A 47:1288
Treacy P.B. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67:014101
Bell J.S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge
Bohm D. (1989). Quantum Theory. Dover Publications Inc., New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carbó-Dorca, R. On Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox. J Math Chem 41, 209–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-006-9054-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-006-9054-4