Abstract
In this study we present the seasonal chemical characteristics and potential sources of PM10 at an urban location of Delhi, India during 2010˗2019. The concentrations of carbonaceous aerosols [organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), water soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and water insoluble organic carbon (WIOC)] and elements (Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cr, F, Cl, Br, P, S, K, As, Na, Mg, Ca, B, Ni, Mo, V, Sr, Zr and Rb) in PM10 were estimated to explore their possible sources. The annual average concentration (2010–2019) of PM10 was computed as 227 ± 97 µg m−3 with a range of 34˗734 µg m−3. The total carbonaceous aerosols in PM10 was accounted for 22.5% of PM10 mass concentration, whereas elements contribution to PM10 was estimated to be 17% of PM10. The statistical analysis of OC vs. EC and OC vs. WSOC of PM10 reveals their common sources (biomass burning and/or fossil fuel combustion) during all the seasons. Enrichment factors (EFs) of the elements and the relationship of Al with other crustal metals (Fe, Ca, Mg and Ti) of PM10 indicates the abundance of mineral dust over Delhi. Principal component analysis (PCA) extracted the five major sources [industrial emission (IE), biomass burning + fossil fuel combustion (BB + FFC), soil dust, vehicular emissions (VE) and sodium and magnesium salts (SMS)] of PM10 in Delhi, India. Back trajectory and cluster analysis of airmass parcel indicate that the pollutants approaching to Delhi are mainly from Pakistan, IGP region, Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A megacity Delhi is considered to be one of the most polluted city in the world, bearing the choking level particulate matter (PM) over the city. The impact of PM on climate and human health have become a subject of major concern for the scientific community and public powers all around the world in recent years (IPCC 2013). Carbonaceous aerosols (CAs) are the major fractions of PM in the atmosphere and have significant role in visibility degradation, alteration of atmospheric chemistry and the Earth’s radiative balance (Lim and Turpin 2002; Hansen et al. 2005; Bond et al. 2013). Various toxic gases, organics and hydrocarbons are produced during the combustion process/emissions of CAs and therefore affect the respiratory as well as cardiovascular system of the human (Lighty et al. 2000; Pope et al. 2009a, b). Both primary and secondary organic aerosols significantly control of physical and chemical properties of aerosols (Kanakidou et al. 2005) and influenced the formation cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), whereas EC absorb solar radiation and contribute for radiative change (Bond et al. 2013). PM consists of organics (OC, EC, and other components), mineral/crustal/soil dust, metals, non-metals, inorganic pollutants, sea salts and relative exuberance of these species are highly variable both spatially and temporally (Ram et al. 2011; Jain et al. 2017).
Generally, the elements linked with the PM are non-volatile in nature and remain unaffected even though they go for regional as well as long-range transportation (Morawska and Zhang 2002). Some of the transition/toxic metals (like Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, Ni, Cr, As, Pb, Hg) which are coming from the various sources into the ambient air have acute toxic and mutagenic effects on human health, when inhaled at higher concentrations. Elements like Fe, Al, Si, Ca and Ti are also available in the fine and coarse mode PM is originated from mineral dust/crustal dust (Sharma et al. 2014a). Soluble K in PM mostly originated from biomass burning, however, it is also considered to be dust in PM (Viana et al. 2008), whereas Cl originated from sea salt is also considered from coal burning in aerosols (Pant and Harrison 2012). Therefore, quantification and identification of chemical species and sources of PM is essential to explore the appropriate mitigation option to improve the ambient air quality, human health and climate (Ramana et al. 2010; Cao et al. 2006; Bond et al. 2013; Pope et al. 2009ab; Ramgolam et al. 2009; Sharma et al. 2018a, b).
Several studies conducted in past on carbonaceous aerosols, inorganic aerosols and elements of particulate matter and their potential sources in urban (Ram and Sarin, 2011; Mandal et al. 2014; Sharma et al. 2016; Gupta et al. 2017; 2018; Gadi et al. 2019; Shivani et al. 2019; Jain et al. 2020a, b), rural, remote (Begam et al. 2017) as well as high altitude atmosphere (Kumar and Attri, 2016; Sarkar et al. 2017; Kaushal et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2020a,b) of India on seasonal basis and restricted to a year long data sets, but limited study has been conducted on long-term basis over the IGP region of India. The atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols and elements in PM bear immense importance from the perspective of climate change and bio-geochemical cycles over the region (Sharma et al. 2016). Hence, considering the importance of atmospheric carbonaceous species and elements of PM10 in urban area, a long-term observations has been carried out at megacity Delhi. In the present study, the concentrations of carbonaceous species (OC, EC, WSOC. WIOC, POC and SOC) and elements (Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cr, Ni, Mo, Cl, P, S, K, Zr, Pb, Na, Mg, Ca, and B) of PM10 are estimated during 2010–2019 to explore the possible sources of PM10 over Delhi.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Description of study site
Delhi is situated in northern part of India and it is considered to be one of the most polluted megacity in the world with annual average PM10 concentration approaching more than 10-times the WHO (world health organization guideline: 25 μg m−3). Delhi has currently 31.2 million population (WRP 2021) and over ~ 11 million registered vehicles (Statistical Abstract of Delhi 2020). PM10 samples were collected periodically at CSIR-National Physical Laboratory (CSIR-NPL), New Delhi (28°38′N, 77°10′E; 218 m amsl) during January, 2010, to December, 2019. The study site represents an urban background surrounded by nearby traffice and Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) in north and south-west direction (Fig. 1). A year long meteorology of Delhi is divided into four (as per India Metrological Department (IMD), New Delhi classification) distinct seasons: winter (January ˗ February), summer (March ˗ May), monsoon (June ˗ September) and post˗monsoon (October ˗ December). Winter months are chilly (temperature: ~ 2 °C) and observe intense fog and haze. Summers are generally very hot and dry (temperature: 47 °C) and observe frequent dust storms (soil and mineral dust). A detailed description of sampling site is discussed in our previous publication (Sharma et al. 2018a).
2.2 Sample collection and analysis
Coarse mode particulate matter (PM10) samples (n = 674) were collected periodically (2 samples in a week) on pre-combusted (at 550 °C) Pallflex tissue quartz filters using Respirable Dust Sampler (flow rate:1.2 m3 min−1 ± 2%), for 24 h from January 2010-December 2019 (except January-December 2012). The details of the instrument used for PM10 sample collections are depicted in Table S1 (in supplementary information). The sampler was installed at the rooftop of CSIR-NPL, New Delhi at 10 m height (above the ground level: AGL). The gravimetric mass (in µg) of PM10 was estimated by the difference between final and initial weight (weighing balance: M/s. Sartorius, resolution: ± 10 µg) of the filter. PM10 concentrations (in µg m−3) was further computed by dividing the PM10 mass to the total volume of air passed during 24 h (sampling period). Prior to chemical analysis the samples were stored in deep freezer at −20 °C.
OC and EC concentrations of PM10 were analyzed by Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer (Model: DRI 2001A) applying IMPROVE-A Protocol (Chow et al. 2004). Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer is working on the preferential oxidation of OC and EC at different temperatures (140, 280, 480, 580, 740 and 840 °C). The instrument analyzes the OC fractions (OC1, OC2, OC3 and OC4), pyrolyzed carbon fraction (OP) and EC fractions (EC1, EC2 and EC3), respectively in helium and helium + oxygen environment (Chow et al. 2004; Sharma et al. 2014a, b). A proper punch of ~ 0.536 cm2 area of the PM10 filter was cut and analyzed in triplicate along with field blank filters. The standard calibration for peak area verification was performed daily using 5% CH4 + balance helium gas. Calibration of the OC/EC analyzer was performed by 4.8% of CO2 + balance He gas along with known amounts of KHP (potassium hydrogen phthalate) and sucrose solution. In the present case, repeatability error of OC and EC analysis were estimated as 3–7% (n = 3). To account for the unmeasured H, O, N, and S in organic compounds, a conversion factor (or multiplier) is used to transform OC to OM (OM = f × OC). The f multipliers of 1.4 and 1.8 are depending on the extent of OM oxidation and secondary organic aerosols (SOA) formation. The values of f vary from 1.2 for fresh aerosol in urban areas (Chow et al. 2004) to 2.6 for aged aerosol (Robinson et al. 2007). In the present case, TCA of PM10 is computed as OM + EC [(OM = 1.8 × OC) + EC] (Rengarajan et al. 2007; Srinivas and Sarin 2014). The detailed analytical and calibration procedures of Thermal/Optical Carbon Analyzer is described in our previous publication (Sharma et al. 2014a, b).
The 10 ml filtered extract of PM10 samples were analyzed to estimate the concentrations of WSOC and WIOC using a TOC analyzer working on catalytically-aided combustion oxidation method (Model: Shimadzu TOC-L CPH/CPN, Japan). Briefly, sample extracts were injected and sprayed onto high temperature platinum catalyst at 680◦ C to convert total carbon to CO2 and measured by NDIR detector. Consecutively, inorganic carbon in the water extract was determined after acidification of another aliquot of the sample of PH 2 with 25% phosphoric acid and measuring the evolved CO2. The NDIR detector response for inorganic carbon was calibrated with a Na2CO3 standard. The water-soluble organic carbon was assessed from the difference between the total carbon and the inorganic carbon. The repeatability of WSOC was estimated to be 3–10% based on triplicate analysis of each filter. The detail, analytical procedures is described in Rai et al. (2020a).
The concentrations of elements i.e., Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Cr, Ni, Mo, Cl, P, S, K, Zr, Pb, Na, Mg, Ca, and B etc., in PM10 are analyzed (with repeatability errors 5–10%) using Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (WD-XRF). The analysis of major and trace elements were carried out by a non-destructive method of quantitative elemental analysis using Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (ZSX Primus, Rigaku, Japan). Measurement of elements were taken under standard reference conditions (vacuum condition, 36 ºC temperature and 2.4 kW tube rating). The parameter method was employed in the quantitative analysis given in ZSX software package of WD-XRF. The instrument WD-XRF was calibrated periodically using micro-matter thin-film standards (Watson et al. 1999). PM10 samples were analyzed in triplicate and for these major and trace elements. The detail analytical procedures is available in Jain et al. (2020a, b).
2.3 Estimation of POC and SOC
The seasonal concentrations of primary organic carbon (POC) in PM10 samples are calculated using minimum OC/EC ratio of each season (for winter:1.26, summer:1.48, monsoon:1.58 and post-monsoon:1.55). The concentration of POC is computed using the following equation (Castro et al. 1999),
Secondary organic carbon (SOC) of PM10 is estimated as the difference between OC and POC (SOC = OC–POC).
2.4 Enrichment Factors (EFs)
Crustal EFs referes the origin of the elements (either anthropogenic or natural) and their abundance in the ambient particulates (Amato et al. 2016). EFs of the elements present in atmosphereic PM10 samples are computed (Taylor and McLennan, 1995) as:
where,
Esample = element (E) concentration.
Xsample = reference element (X) concentration.
Ecrust = element (E) concentration in upper continental crust.
Xcrust = reference element (X) concentration in upper continental crust.
Aluminium (Al) is used as the reference element in this study (Khilare and Sarkar 2012; Sharma et al. 2014a, b).
2.4.1 Principal component analysis (PCA)
PCA was applied on chemical constituents of PM10 to identify the potential sources contributing to PM10 concentration. It uses orthogonal decomposition to identify individual groups of components which are then tied to variables by loading factors (Viana et al. 2008). The detail processes, mathematical equations and hypothesis of PCA are available in various literatures (Song et al. 2006; Jain et al 2021).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Variations in concentrations of chemical species of PM10
3.1.1 Variation in PM10 concentration
Figures 2˗3 shows the temporal variation in mass concentrations of PM10 and its chemical components monitored during Januray 2010 to December 2019 (including annual trend in Fig. S2). The annual average concentration (9˗year average) of PM10 was estimated as 227 ± 92 µg m−3 (range: 33—733 µg m−3) with annual average maxima (279 ± 99 µg m−3) in 2016 and annual average minima (189 ± 59 µg m−3) in 2010. The year-wise annual concentrations of PM10, OC, EC, WSOC, WIOC, POC and SOC from Januray 2010 to December 2019 are depicted in Table 1 (including annual trend of OC, EC and WSOC in Fig. S2). The maximum monthly concentration (pooled estimate of 9 years) of PM10 was noted in colder month December (346 ± 42 µg m−3) and the minimum monthly average concentration of PM10 was observed in September (127 ± 42 µg m−3 µg m−3) during monsoon month. The monthly average concentration of PM10 are shown in Fig. 3. The highest seasonal average concentration of PM10 (304 ± 92 µg m−3) were found during post-monsoon seasons followed by winter (271 ± 95 µg m−3), summer (221 ± 81 µg m−3) and monsoon (181 ± 85 µg m−3) seasons (Table 2). Sharma et al. (2014a, b) (213 μg m−3), Mandal et al. (2014) (285 μg m−3), Jain et al. (2019) (250 μg m−3), Kulshrestha et al. (2009) (219 μg m−3), Perrino et al. (2011) (183 μg m−3) and Tiwari et al. (2013) (161 μg m−3) are also reported the similar concentration of PM10 over Delhi. All these studies breached the threshold limit (24 h average: 100 μg m−3 and annual average: 60 μg m−3) of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) of India. Highest PM10 concentration during post-monsoon season (October-December) were mainly attributed to the firework display during Diwali festival and crop residue burning activities in the agricultural activities along with meteorological conditions like high relative humidity, low wind speed and low boundary layer height resulted in accumulation of PM10 mass generated from these activities in the lower surface (Shivani et al. 2019). Higher concentration of pollutants during winter season (January–February) could be attributed to the prevailing meteorological conditions i.e. low temperature, stable atmosphere (cool air causes inversions that stagnate the air and trap pollution close to the ground) and low wind speed. While during summer season (March–May) higher windspeed along with high mixing height results in dispersion of pollutants. However, frequent dust storms during summer season increase the PM concentration in the region. On contrary, rainfall during monsoon season scavenged off the atmospheric particles leading to their lower concentration (Sharma et al. 2016).
3.1.2 Variation in OC, EC and WSOC of PM10
Temporal variations in OC, EC and WSOC concentrations of PM10 during study period are shown in Fig. 2. The total annual average (9 years) concentrations of OC, EC, WSOC, WIOC, POC and SOC of PM10 were 24.5 ± 13.8 µg m−3, 7.7 ± 5.1 µg m−3, 10.5 ± 7.1 µg m−3; 11.5 ± 8.1 µg m−3, 12.7 ± 6.3 µg m−3 and 11.8 ± 8.5 µg m−3, respectively. Figure 3 shows the monthly average concentrations of OC, EC and WSOC in PM10 during the entire study period in Delhi (pooled estimate of 9 years). Highest monthly average OC in PM10 (48.1 ± 13.8 µg m−3) was found in December (post-monsoon/cold season), whereas monthly average minima of OC in PM10 (12.5 ± 8.3 µg m−3) was found in August (monsoon). Similar monthly average maxima and minima of EC (in PM10) was recorded in December (15.7 ± 6.9 µg m−3) and August (3.4 ± 2.4 µg m−3) of post-monsoon and monsoon, respectively (Fig. 3). Highest monthly average concentration of WSOC concentration in PM10 (20.6 ± 6.4 µg m−3; 50% of OC) was recorded in November (post-monsoon) may be due to the influence of stubble burning nearby northern states of India (Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh of IGP) and minima in August (5.2 ± 3.1 µg m−3). The seasonal average concentrations of OC, EC, WSOC, WIOC, POC, SOC TCA and their weight ratios are summarized in Table 2. Highest seasonal average concentration of OC was recorded in post-monsoon (38.0 ± 14.4 µg m−3) and minimum seasonal average of OC was recorded during monsoon (14.1 ± 8.2 µg m−3). Similarly, seasonal average maxima and minima of EC were recorded in post-monsoon (12.1 ± 6.6 µg m−3) and monsoon (4.0 ± 2.5 µg m−3) seasons. Average WSOC concentration was also recorded highest during post-monsoon saeson (18.4 ± 8.6 µg m−3) and minimum in monsoon season (5.8 ± 3.2 µg m−3).
Total annual average concentration of TCA contributes 22.5% of PM10 (54.7 ± 24.5 µg m−3) mass concentration. The highest TCA in PM10 was recorded in post-monsoon (26.5% of PM10) season followed by winter (22.9% of PM10), summer (21.1% of PM10) and monsoon (19.4% of PM10) seasons. The annual average concentration of POC of PM10 was 12.7 ± 6.3 µg m−3 (52.1% of OC; range: 33–76% of OC) and SOC was 11.8 ± 8.5 µg m−3 (48.2% of OC; range: 25–67% of OC) during entire study period. The seasonal contribution of POC and SOC were ranging from 48–54% and 48–42% of OC, respectively. Jain et al. (2017) reported almost similar percentage contributions of OC (10% of PM10), EC (5% of PM10) and TCA (23% of PM10) of PM10 at Delhi, whereas Mandal et al. (2014) reported higher percentage contributions of OC (32.8% of PM10), EC (9.5% of PM10) and TCA (61.8% of PM10) of PM10 in an industrial area of Delhi. Ram et al. (2011) also reported 22% OC and 3% EC of PM10 at an urban site of Kanpur in IGP of India during 2009. Monthly as well as seasonal variations in concentrations of PM10, OC, EC and WSOC may be due to the source strength and prevailing meteorological conditions at the measurement site of Delhi. The changes in mixing height of the boundary layer during the various seasons may also influence the higher concentration of PM10 and its carbonaceous species (Salma et al. 2004; Begum et al. 2011). It is noteworthy that apart from stable atmosphere and lowered boundary layer height, the particulates emitted from crop residue burning in the states of Punjab and Haryana (a popular after harvesting practise performed by farmers during the months of October and November), get transported and advected towards Delhi region (Gupta et al. 2018; Shivani et al. 2019). This is the major cause of loading of carbonaceous aerosols during post-monsoon season over the sampling region. Other scientific studies also exhibit similar seasonal pattern of OC and EC concentration in Delhi (Sharma et al. 2014a, b; Sharma et al. 2016; Jain et al. 2017; Gupta et al. 2018; Gadi et al. 2019; Shivani et al. 2019).
Figure 3b shows the monthly average OC/EC and WSOC/OC ratios of PM10 at Delhi, whereas the seasonal relationship between OC & EC and WSOC & OC of PM10 are depicted in Fig. S1 (see the supplementary information). The seasonal average OC/EC ratio of PM10 was 3.7 ± 2.8, 3.4 ± 1.9, 3.5 ± 1.6 and 3.7 ± 1.9 during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon, respectively whereas the seasonal average WSOC/OC ratio of PM10 was reported as 0.44, 0.35, 0.41 and 0.48 during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon, respectively. Banoo et al. (2020) reported the similar seasonal OC/EC ratios (3.4, 3.5, 4.0 and 3.9 during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon, respectively) over National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi wheraes WSOC/OC ratios as 0.55, 0.47, 0.57 and 0.60 during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon, respectively. It is to be noted that the poor solubility of organics emitted from the combustion of the fossil fuels (diesel, petrol etc.) the WSOC/OC values for vehicular emissions are low (< 0.20) as compared to biomass burning (0.20–0.80). Therefore, biomass burning emissions have higher solubility in water than fossil fuel combustion (Rengarajan et al. 2007). In this study, significant positive correlation between OC vs. EC (r2 = 0.68, r2 = 0.73, r2 = 0.82 and r2 = 0.69 at p < 0.05 during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons, respectively) of PM10 has been observed during all the seasons (Table S2; in supplementary information), which is indicative of their common sources (Rengarajan et al. 2007; Ram and Sarin 2011). The positive correlation of K (a tracer of biomass) with Na, Ca and Mg of PM10 during all the seasons (except post-monsoon) demonstrate the abundance of soil dust contributed by soluble organic sources to PM10 at study site (Tables S3-S6; in supplementary information). It is considered that the soil suspension, fuel combustion (Urban et al. 2012), and formation of secondary water soluble organic aerosols (Lim et al. 2010) are also some other sources of WSOC in the sampling site of Delhi.
3.1.3 Concentration of elements in PM10
During the entire sampling period (2010–2019) 18 common elements (Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cr, F, Cl, Br, P, S, K, As, Na, Mg, and Ca) were extracted in PM10 (B, Ni, Mo, V, Sr, Zr and Rb are also traced in few samples ranges from 0–0.09 µg m−3) using X-RF technique. The annual and seasonal statistical summary of elements recorded in PM10 samples is tabulated in Table 2. Higher concentrations of Ca, Na, Cl, K, Al, and Fe were observed during all the seasons with seasonal variability. The temporal variation in concentration elements present in PM10 samples are depicted in Fig. 4; whereas monthly average concentrations of elements of PM10 are shown in Fig. 5. Highest average contribution of elements to PM10 are accounted for 20.9% (of PM10) during monsoon season followed by summer (16.5% PM10), winter (15.7% of PM10) and post-monsoon seasons (15.2% of PM10). The similar contribution of elements to the PM10 over Delhi is also reported by Rai et al. (2020a, b; 2021).
Figure 6 depicts the seasonal enrichment factors (EFs) of the elements (Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cr, F, Cl, Br, P, S, K, As, Na, Mg, and Ca) available in PM10 samples. Al, Fe, Ti, K, Mg, and Ca in PM10 have recorded low EFs (< 5) for all the seasons, which indicate that, elements mostly arrived from crustal/soil sources (Sharma et al. 2014a, b; Saxena et al. 2017). The element like Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cr, Mo and B have higher EFs (> 10) in both PM2.5 and PM10 and therefore are likely of anthropogenic origin. The higher the EF of Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn of PM10 were also attributed to industrial emission (IE) sources. Generally Cu, Mn, Zn, Ni, Cd, Fe, Mo, S and Cr used as a marker for IE in India (Shridhar et al. 2010).
In this study, Fe/Al ratio is 0.40 (winter: 0.32; summer: 0.58; monsoon: 0.45 and post-monsoon: 0.24), which indicates the dominant source of mineral/crustal dust at the study site. The average Ca/Al ratio (1.62) indicates (in winter: 1.78; summer: 1.72; monsoon: 1.61 and post-monsoon: 1.35) that PM10 over the Delhi region is rich in Ca dust as compared to average continental crust. Sarin et al. (1979) had reported that the Fe/Al ratio in north Indian plains ranged from 0.55 to 0.63. Kumar and Sarin (2009) reported Fe/Al ratio as 0.59 for PM2.5–10 at a remote high altitude sampling site (Manora Peak, Nainital: ~ 1951 m above the mean sea level) of western India. McLennan, (2001) recorded the average Ca/Al ratio as 1.07 in PM10 whereas, the corresponding ratio in the upper continental crust is 0.38. Correlation matrix of Al with Fe, Ca, Mg and Ti of PM10 during all the seasons are also indicated the abundance of mineral/soil dust in Delhi (Table S3-S6; in supplementary information).
3.2 Possible sources and source regions
3.2.1 Sources of PM10
Principal component analysis (PCA) has been performed with 23 chemical species of PM10 (OC, EC, WSOC, SOC, POC, Al, Fe, Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cr, F, Cl, Br, P, S, K, As, Na, Mg, and Ca) to extract the factor loading to PM10. Seasonal factor profiles (9 year long data sets) for the possible sources of PM10 was extracted using PCA are summarized in Table S7a-d (in supplementary information). On the basis of the factor loading PCA resolved the five common sources [industrial emissions (IE), biomass burning + fossil fuel combustion (BB + FFC), crustal/soil dust (SD), vehicular emissions (VE) and sodium and magnesium salts (SMS)] of PM10 during winter, summer, monsoon (extracted four sources) and post-monsoon seasons at an urban site of Delhi.
Source 1: During winter season the first source of PM10 is characterized as industrial emissions (IE) due to higher loading of Cu, Zn, Mn, Cr, S, Fe and Pb in aerosol samples (Table S7a). These elements (Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr and Mo) are generally originated from the small to medial scale industries, metal processing industries, industrial effluents and coal fired thermal power plants (Gupta et al. 2007; Jain et al. 2019). During summer, IE was also extracted as a factor 1 of PM10 with 27.4% of variance (Table S7b) whereas during monsoon and post monsoon seasons IE was extracted as factor 2 (Table S7c-d); in supplementary information).
Source 2: The second factor of represents the BB + FFC, characterized (18.8% of the variance during winter and 20.5% of the variance during summer) by highly loaded with OC, EC, WSOC, SOC, POC, K, and Cl. K+ and Levoglucoson are considered BB (cow dung, crop residue, fuel wood, and wildfires, etc.) marker, whereas presence of Cl in the factor reveals the wood and coal burning (Pant and Harrison 2012). WSOC/OC and OC/EC ratios also evidence the BB + FFC as a one of the sources of PM10 at the observational site of Delhi (Banoo et al. 2020). Factor 1 was extracted as source of BB + FFC during monsoon and post-monsoon seasons with 30.3% and 24.6% of the variance, respectively (Table S7c-d) in supplementary information).
Source 3: The third factor of PM10 represented by high loading (12.5%, 11.1%, 13.3% and 12.2% of the variance during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons, respectively) of crustal elements like, Al, Ti, Fe, Ca, Mg, K and Na which inferred the source as crustal/soil/road dust during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons (Begum et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2014a; Jain et al. 2020b). The abundance of these elements at the study site as crustal origin is also confirmed by EFs (Fig. 5) as well as positive correlations of Al with Ca, Mg and Ti (Table S1-S8). This factor of PM2.5 was resolved as crustal/soil dust by high loading of Al, Ti, Fe, Ca, Mg, K and Na (17.6% of the variance of factor loading) (Table S7a-d). The EFs of these elements are also suggesting the crustal origin the elements at sampling site (Fig. 6) of Delhi as well as the positive correlations of Al with Ca, Mg, Fe and Ti.
Source 4: The fourth factor of PM10 constitutes the vehicular emissions (VE) with the dominant presence of EC, OC, Zn, Mn, and Cr indicates (with 9.4%, 9.9%, 10.7% and 9.3% of the variance during winter, summer, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons, respectively) the emission derived from road side vehicles (Pant and Harrison 2012; Jain et al. 2020b). Since, EC and OC are majorily emitted from the combustion sources, so these components are considered as important tracers for VE globally (Yin et al. 2010; Beum et al. 2011). Zn and Mn are used as marker of brake and tire wear, two stroke engine emissions (Zn as fuel additive), heavy duty diesel truck emission (Mn as fuel additive) (Kothai et al. 2008; Sharma et al. 2014a). VE is inferred to be one of the major sources of aerosols (Sharma et al. 2020b) at in urban sites of Delhi region may due to the great influence of public and private vehicles (light and heavy vehicles) (Jain et al. 2020a, b).
Source 5: Fifth source is resolved as sodium and magnesium salt (SMS) due to high factor loading of Na and Mg (Choi et al. 2013). Even though, Na, Mg, and Cl are used as markers for sea salt or marine aerosols (Pant and Harrison 2012) however the sampling site neither is and nor surrounded by coastal region, hence it would be more relevant to refer this source as sodium and magnesium salt (Jain et al. 2019). However, long-range transportation of the pollutants from the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal (Fig. 7) to the sampling site may be considered as sea salt as a source in stead of SMS. The contribution of SMS was extracted by PCA during all the seasons with < 8% of variance excluding monsoon season (where combined source was extracted i.e., SMS). During monsoon season heavy rainfall and winds flowing from Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal (Fig. 7) contribute to SMS/sea salt loading in the sampling region (Jain et al. 2017).
3.2.2 Air mass backward trajectory/source region
To explore the transport pathway of PM10 at the observational site of Delhi, 120 h air-mass back trajectory was computed using the HYSPLIT model (Draxler and Rolph 2003) at an altitude of 500 m AGL (Fig. 7). During winter, air parcels approaching to sampling site is mainly from the continental region of IGP, India [northern part of India (Punjab, Haryana) and eastern part (Uttar Pradesh)]. During summer, pollutants reaching to receptor site from the northern India (Punjab, Haryana, eastern part of Uttar Pradesh) including Pakistan (continental region) as well as from marine region (Arabian sea through Gujarat and Rajasthan). During monsoon season, the air mass also approaching to sampling site from Arabian sea (through Gujarat and Rajasthan) and Bay of Bengal (through eastern IGP of India). Jain et al. (2021) reported the similar air parcels towards the Delhi during all the seasons over Delhi during 2013–2016.
4 Conclusions
The annual and seasonal characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols and elements in PM10 were estimated during 2010˗2019 to explore the prominent sources of PM10 in megacity Delhi, India. During the entire study period, the average concentration of PM10 was recorded as 227 ± 97 µg m−3 with non-significant increasing annual trend. The seasonal average total CAs in PM10 was accounted for 26.5%; 22.9%; 21.1% and 19.4%; of PM10, during post-monsoon, winter, summer and monsoon seasons, respectively. The annual average (pooled average of 9-year data) contribution of elements to PM10 is accounted for 17% of PM10 (during monsoon: 20.9%; summer: 16.5%; winter: 15.7% and post-monsoon: 15.2%). Significant positive linear relationship between OC & EC; and OC & WSOC (OC/EC and WSOC/OC ratios) indicate the BB + FFC are one of the major sources of carbonaceous aerosols at the urban site of Delhi. EFs of the elements indicates the abundance of mineral/soil dust in the megacity Delhi during all the seasons. PCA resolved the five common sources (IE, BB + FFC, crustal/SD, VE and SMS) of PM10 over the region. 120-h HYSPLIT back trajectory air parcels indicate that the pollutants approaching to Delhi are mainly from continental [Pakistan, IGP region (Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh)] as well as marine region (Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal).
Data availability
The datasets developed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Amato, F., Alastuey, A., Karanasiou, A., Lucarelli, F., Nava, S., Calzolai, G., Severi, M., Becagli, S., Vorne, L.G., Colombi, C., Alves, C., Custódio, D., Nunes, T., Cerqueira, M., Pio, C., Eleftheriadis, K., Diapouli, E., Reche, C., Minguillón, M.C., Manousakas, M.I., Maggos, T., Vratolis, S., Harrison, R.M., Querol, X.: IRUSE-LIFE. Atmos. Chem Phys 16, 3289–3309 (2016)
Banoo, R., Sharma, S.K., Gadi, R., Gupta, R., Mandal, T.K.: Seasonal variation of carbonaceous species of PM10 over urban sites of National Capital Region of India. Aerosol Sci Engin 4(2), 111–123 (2020)
Begam, G.R., Vachaspati, C.V., AhammedYN, K.K.R., Reddy, R.R., Sharma, S.K., Saxena, M., Mandal, T.K.: Seasonal characteristics of water soluble inorganic ions and carbonaceous aerosols in total suspended particulate matter at a rural semi-arid site, Kadapa (India). Environ Sci Poll Res 24(2), 1719–1734 (2017)
Begum, B.A., Hossain, A., Saroar, G., Biswas, S.K., Nasiruddin, M., Nahar, N., Chowdury, Z., Hopke, P.K.: Sources of carbonaceous materials in the airborne particulate matter of Dhaka. Asian J Atmos Environ 5(4), 237–246 (2011)
Bond, T.C., Doherty, S.J., Fahey, D.W., Forster, P.M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B.J., Flanner, M.G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J Geophy Res 118(11), 5380–5552 (2013)
Cao, J.J., Chow, J.C., Lee, S.C., Li, Y., Chen, S.W., An, Z.S., Fung, K., Watson, J.G., Zhu, C.S., Liu, S.X.: Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003 in Xi’an, China. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 5, 3561–3593 (2006)
Castro, L.M., Pio, C.A., Harrison, R.M., Smith, D.J.T.: Carbonaceous aerosol in urban and rural European atmospheres: estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations. Atmos Environ 33, 2771–2781 (1999)
Choi, J.K., Heo, J.B., Ban, S.J., Yi, S.M., Zoh, K.D., Source apportionment of PM2.5 at the coastal area in Korea. Sci Total Environ 447, 370–380 (2013)
Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Chen, L.W.A., Arnott, W.P., Moosmuller, H.: Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. Environ Sci Technol 38, 4414–4422 (2004)
Draxler, R.R., Rolph, G.D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model. Access via NOAA ARL READY website. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring (2003). http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html
Gupta, A.K., Karar, K., Srivastava, A.: Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 and TSP in residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India. J Hazardous Materials 142, 279–287 (2007)
Gadi, R., Shivani, Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K.: Source apportionment and health risk assessment of organic constituents in fine ambient aerosols (PM2.5): a complete year study over National Capital Region of India Chemosphere 221,583–596 (2019)
Gupta, S., Gadi, R., Mandal, T.K., Sharma, S.K.: Seasonal variations and source profile of n-alkanes in particulate matter (PM10) at a heavy traffic site, Delhi. Environ Monit Assess 189, 43 (2017)
Gupta, S., Gadi, R., Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K.: Characterization and source apportionment of organic compounds in PM10 using PCA and PMF at a traffic hotspot of Delhi. Sustain Cities Soc 39, 52–67 (2018)
Hansen, J.M., Sato, R., Rued, L., Nazarenko, A., Lacis, G.A., Schmidt, G., Russell, I., Aleinov, M., Bauer, S., Bauer, N., Bell, B., Cairns, V., Canuto, M., Chandler, Y., Cheng, A., Del Genio, G., Faluvegi, E., Fleming, A., Friend, T., Hall, C., Jackman, M., Kelley, N.Y., Kiang, D., Koch, J., Lean, J., Lerner, K., Lo, S., Menon, R.L., Miller, P., Minnis, T., Novakov, V., Oinas, J.P., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, D., Rind, A., Romanou, D., Shindell, P., Stone, S., Sun, N., Tausnev, D., Thresher, B., Wielicki, T., Wong, M.Y., Zhang, X.: Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110, D18104 (2005)
IPCC.: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp. (2013)
Jain, S., Sharma, S.K., Vijayan, N., Mandal, T.K.: Seasonal characteristics of aerosols (PM2.5 and PM10) and their source apportionment using PMF: A four year study over Delhi, India. Environ Poll 262, 114337 (2020a)
Jain, S., Sharma, S.K., Choudhary, N., Masiwal, R., Saxena, M., Sharma, A., Mandal, T.K., Gupta, A., Gupta, N.C., Sharma, C.: Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 using PCA/APCS, UNMIX, and PMF at an urban site of Delhi, India. Environ Sci Poll Res 24(17), 14637–14656 (2017)
Jain, S., Sharma, S.K., Srivastava, M.K., Chaterjee, A., Singh, R.K., Saxena, M., Mandal, T.K.: Source apportionment of PM10 using receptor models in Indo-Gangetic plain (IGP) of India. Archives Environ Contamin Toxicol 76, 114–128 (2019)
Jain, S., Sharma, S.K., Vijayan, N., Mandal, T.K.: Seasonal characteristics of aerosols (PM2.5 and PM10) and their source apportionment using PMF: A four year study over Delhi. India Environ Poll 262, 114337 (2020b)
Jain, S., Sharma, S.K., Srivastava, M.K., Chatterjee, A., Vijayan, N., Tripathy, S.S., Kumari, K.M., Mandal, T.K., Sharma, C.: Chemical characterization, source apportionment and transport pathways of PM2.5 and PM10 over Indo Gangetic Plain of India. Urban Clim 36, 100805 (2021)
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F.J., Facchini, M.C., Dingenen, R.V., Ervens, B., Nenes, A.N.C.J.S.E., Nielsen, C.J., Swietlicki, E.: Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review. Atmos Chem Phy 5(4), 1053–1123 (2005)
Kaushal, D., Kumar, A., Yadav, S., Tandon, A., Attri, A.K.: Wintertime carbonaceous aerosols over Dhauladhar region of North-Western Himalayas. Environ Sci Poll Res 25, 8044–8056 (2018)
Khillare, P.S., Sarkar, S.: Airborne inhalable metals in residential areas of Delhi, India: distribution, source apportionment and health risks. Atmos Poll Res 3(1), 46–54 (2012)
Kothai, P., Saradhi, I.V., Prathibha, P., Hopke, P.K., Pandit, G.G., Puranik, V.D.: Source apportionment of coarse and fine particulate matter at Navi Mumbai. India. Aerosol Air Qual Res 8(4), 423–436 (2008)
Kulshrestha, A., Satsangi, P.G., Masih, J., Taneja, A.: Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra, India. Sci Total Environ 407(24), 6196–6204 (2009)
Kumar, A., Attri, A.K.: Biomass combustion a dominant source of carbonaceous aerosols in the ambient environment of western Himalayas. Aerosol Air Qual Res 16(3), 519–529 (2016)
Kumar, A., Sarin, M.M.: Mineral aerosols from western India: temporal variability of course and fine atmospheric dust and elemental characteristics. Atmos Environ 43, 4005–4013 (2009)
Lighty, J.S., Veranth, J.M., Sarofim, A.F.: Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition implications to human health. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50(9), 1565–1618 (2000)
Lim, H.J., Turpin, B.J.: Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta: Results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta supersite experiment. Environ Sci Technol 36, 4489–4496 (2002)
Lim, Y.B., Tan, Y., Perri, M.J., Seitzinger, S.P., Turpin, B.J.: Aqueous chemistry and its role in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation. Atmos Chem Phys Discussions 10(6), (2010)
Mandal, P., Sarkar, R., Mandal, A., Saud, T.: Seasonal variation and sources of aerosol pollution in Delhi. India. Environ Chem Lett 12(4), 529–534 (2014)
McLennan, S.: Relationship between the trace element composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2, 1021 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000/GC000109
Morawska, L., Zhang, J.J.: Combustion sources of particles. Health Relevance and Source Signatures. Chemosphere 49, 1045–1058 (2002)
Pant, P., Harrison, R.M.: Critical review of receptor modeling for particulate matter: a case study of India. Atmos Environ 49, 1–12 (2012)
Perrino, C., Tiwari, S., Catrambone, M., Dalla Torre, S., Rantica, E., Canepari, S.: Chemical characterization of atmospheric PM in Delhi, India, during different periods of the year including Diwali festival. Atmospheric Pollut Res 2(4), 418–427 (2011)
Pope, C.A., Ezzati, M., Dockery, D.W.: Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 360(4), 376–386 (2009a)
Pope, C.A., Ezzati, M., Dockery, D.W.: Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med 360(4), 376–386 (2009b)
Rai, A., Mukherjee, S., Chatterjee, A., Choudhary, N., Kotnala, G., Mandal, T.K., Sharma, S.K.: Seasonal variation of OC, EC and WSOC of PM10 and their CWT analysis over the eastern Himalaya. Aerosol Sci Eng 4, 26–40 (2020a)
Rai, P., Furger, M., El Haddad, I., Kumar, V., Wang, L., Singh, A., Dixit, K., Bhattu, D., Petit, J.E., Ganguly, D., Rastogi, N.: Real-time measurement and source apportionment of elements in Delhi's atmosphere. Sci Total Environ 742:140332 (2020b)
Ram, K., Sarin, M.M.: Day–night variability of EC, OC, WSOC and inorganic ions in urban environment of Indo-Gangetic Plain: Implications to secondary aerosol formation. Atmos Environ 45, 460–468 (2011)
Ramana, M.V., Ramanathan, V., Feng, Y., Yoon, S.C., Kim, S.W., Carmichael, G.R., Schauer, J.J.: Warming influenced by the ratio of black carbon to sulphate and the black-carbon source. Nat Geosci 3, 542–545 (2010)
Ramgolam, K., Favez, O., Cachier, H., Gaudichet, A., Marano, F., Martinon, L.: Size-partitioning of an urban aerosol to identify particle determinants involved in the pro-inflammatory response induced in airway epithelial cells. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 6(1), (2009).https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-6-10
Rengarajan, R., Sarin, M.M., Sudheer, A.K.: Carbonaceous and inorganic species in atmospheric aerosols during wintertime over urban and high-altitude sites in North India. J Geophy Res 112, D21307 (2007)
Robinson, A.L., Donahue, N.M., Shrivastava, M.K., Weitkamp, E.A., Sage, A.M., Grieshop, A.P., Pandis, S.N.: Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging. Science 315(5816), 1259–1262 (2007)
Salma, I., Chi, X.G., Maenhaut, W.: Elemental and organic carbon in urban canyon and background environments in Budapest, Hungary. Atmos Environ 38, 2517–2528 (2004)
Sarin, M.M., Borole, D.V., Krishnaswami, S.: Geochemistry and geochronology of sediments from the Bay of Bengal and the equatorial Indian Ocean. Proc. Indian Academy of Science 88, 131–154 (1979)
Sarkar, C., Chatterjee, A., Majumdar, D., Roy, A., Srivastava, A., Ghosh, S.K., Raha, S.: How the atmosphere over eastern Himalaya, India is polluted with carbonyl compounds? Temporal variability and identification of sources. Aerosol Air Qual Res 17, 2206–2223 (2017)
Saxena, M., Sharma, A., Sen, A., Saxena, P., Saraswati, Mandal, T.K., Sharma, S.K.: Water soluble inorganic species of PM10 and PM2.5 at an urban site of Delhi, India: seasonal variability and sources. Atmos Res 184, 112–125 (2017)
Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K., Dey, A.K., Deb, N., Jain, S., Saxena, M., Pal, S., Choudhuri, A.K., Yadav, S.: Carbonaceous and inorganic species in PM10 during wintertime over Giridih, Jharkhand (India). J Atmos Chem 75, 219–233 (2018a)
Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K., Jain, S., Saraswati, S.A., Saxena, M.: Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Delhi, India using PMF model. Environ Contam Toxicol 97, 286–293 (2016)
Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K., Saxena, M., Sharma, A., Gautam, R.: Source apportionment of PM10 by using positive matrix factorization at an urban site of Delhi, India. Urban Climate 10, 656–670 (2014a)
Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K., Sharma, C., Kuniyal, J.C., Joshi, R., Dhyani, P.P., Rohtash, Ghayas, H., Gupta, N.C., Sharma, P., Saxena, M., Sharma, A., Arya, B.C., Kumar, A.: Measurements of particulate (PM2.5), BC and trace gases over the Northwestern Himalayan region of India. Mapan 29(4), 243–253 (2014b)
Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K., Sharma, A., Saraswati, J.S.: Seasonal and annual trends of carbonaceous species of PM10 over a megacity Delhi, India during 2010–2017. J Atmos Chem 75, 305–318 (2018b)
Sharma, S.K., Choudhary, N., Kotnala, G., Das, D., Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, A., Vijayan, N., Rai, A., Chatterjee, A., Mandal, T.K.: Wintertime carbonaceous species and trace metals in PM10 in Darjeeling: a high altitude town in the eastern Himalayas. Urban Climate 34(4), 100668 (2020b)
Sharma, S.K., Choudhary, N., Srivastava, P., Naja, M., Vijayan, N., Kotnala, G., Mandal, T.K.: Variation of carbonaceous species and trace elements in PM10 at a mountain site in the central Himalayan region of India. J Atmos Chem 77(3), 49–62 (2020b)
Shivani, Gadi, R., Sharma, S.K., Mandal, T.K.: Seasonal variation, source apportionment and source attributed health risk of fine carbonaceous aerosols over National Capital Region, India. Chemosphere 237, 124500 (2019)
Shridhar, V., Khillare, P., Agarwal, T., Ray, S.: Metallic species in ambient particulate matter at rural and urban location of Delhi. J Hazard Mater 175, 600–607 (2010)
Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Xie, S., Zeng, L., Zheng, M., Salmon, L.G., Shao, M., Slanina, S.: Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ 40 (1), 526–1537 (2006)
Srinivas, B., Sarin, M.M.: PM2.5, EC, and OC in an atmospheric outflow from the Indo-Gangetic Plain: temporal variability and aerosol organic carbon-to-organic mass conversion factor. Sci Total Environ 487, 196–205 (2014)
Taylor, S.R., McLennan, S.M.: The geochemical evolution of the continental crust. Review of Geophysics 33(2), 241–265 (1995)
Tiwari, S., Srivastava, A.K., Singh, A.K.: Heterogeneity in pre-monsoon aerosol characteristics over the Indo-Gangetic Basin. Atmos Environ 77, 738-47 (2013)
Urban, N.B., Slifstein, M., Thompson, J.L., Xu, X., Girgis, R.R., Raheja, S., Haney, M., Abi-Dargham, A.: Dopamine release in chronic cannabis users: a [11c] raclopride positron emission tomography study. Biol. Psychiat. 71(8), 677–683 (2012)
Viana, M., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Harrison, R.M., Hopke, P.K., Winiwarter, W., Vallius, M.: Source apportionment of particulate matter in Europe: a review of methods and results. J Aerosol Sci 39, 827–849 (2008)
Watson, J.G., Chow, J.C., Frazier, C.A.: X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air samples. In: Landsberger S, Creatchman M (Eds.) Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles. Gordon and Breach Science, Amsterdam 1, 67–96 (1999)
WRP.: World Report of Population (2021). https://worldpopulationreview.com
Yin, J., Harrison, R.M., Chen, Q., Rutter, A., Schauer, J.J.: Source apportionment of fine particles at urban background and rural sites in the UK atmosphere. Atmos Environ 44(6), 841–851 (2010)
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Director, CSIR-NPL, New Delhi and Head, Environmental Sciences and Biomedical Division (ES&BMD), CSIR-NPL, New Delhi for their encouragement and support to this study. Authors are thankfully acknowledge the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Air Resources Laboratory for download the air mass trajectories (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html).
Funding
The authors are thankfully acknowledged the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, New Delhi for financial support to this study (EMPOWER OLP-102132; PSC-0112).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design of the study were planned by SKS; Data collection and analysis were performed by SKS, RB, TKM; the first draft was written by SKS. Data interpretation was carried out by SKS, TKM and RB. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, S.K., Banoo, R. & Mandal, T.K. Seasonal characteristics and sources of carbonaceous components and elements of PM10 (2010–2019) in Delhi, India. J Atmos Chem 78, 251–270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-021-09424-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-021-09424-x