Abstract
Using dressed state method, we cleverly solve the dynamics of atom-field interaction in the process of two-photon absorption and emission between atomic levels. Here we suppose that the atom is initially in the ground state and the optical field is initially in Fock state, coherent state or thermal state, respectively. The properties of the atom, including the population in excited state and ground state, the atom inversion, and the properties for optical field, including the photon number distribution, the mean photon number, the second-order correlation function and the Wigner function, are discussed in detail. We derive their analytical expressions and then make numerical analysis for them. In contrast with Jaynes-Cummings model, some similar results, such as quantum Rabi oscillation, revival and collapse, are also exhibit in our considered model. Besides, some novel nonclassical states are generated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Involving the atom-field interaction, one of the simplest and important problems, the coupling of a two-level atom with a single mode of the electromagnetic field, has aroused widespread interests of researchers for many years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Because the two atomic levels are resonant or nearly resonant with the driving field (all other levels are highly detuned), we can adopt a two-level atom description for the atom to deal with these problems [10,11,12]. Under certain realistic approximations, some problem can be reduced to a solvable form. Furthermore, some essential features will be extracted in the atom-field interaction. Representative solvable example is the Jaynes-Cummings model whose effective Hamiltonian is described by \(\hbar \eta \left (a\sigma _{+}+a^{\dag }\sigma _{-}\right ) \), where a(a‡) is the annihilation (creation) operator for the optical field, σ+ (σ−) is the raising (lowering) operator of the atom, and η is the coupling strengthen parameter [13, 14]. Some interesting phenomena for the atom, such as quantum rabi oscillation and revival and collapse [15, 16], will exhibit after the atom-field interaction of the Jaynes-Cummings model. Moreover, some novel quantum states for optical fields will be prepared, which will satisfy the need of quantum state engineering and quantum technology [17]. Besides, there are many possible extensions of the original Jaynes-Cummings model involving various types of alternative interactions. For instance, some models, such as two-photon transitions, multimode and multilevel models, Raman coupled models, two-channel models etc. are involving among them [18,19,20].
In this paper, we consider a model of two-photon absorption and emission between two atomic levels, whose Hamiltonian is described effectively by \(\hbar \eta \left (a^{2}\sigma _{+}+a^{\dag 2}\sigma _{-}\right ) \) [1, 4]. In this process, the atoms in the excited state |e〉 make a transition to the lower level |g〉 by emitting two photons of frequency ν via a virtual level, where the phenomena happen at exact resonance (ω e g = 2ν) and a single-mode two-photon laser can be generated. Fortunately, this is also an exact solvable model. Following the routines used in the Jaynes-Cummings model, we make a detailed investigation for our considered model. Our model will exhibit some similar results obtained from Jaynes-Cummings model, with proper para- meter adjustment. One can resort to many different but equivalent methods to solve for the evolution of the atom-field system. These methods are often based on the solutions of the probability amplitudes, the Heisenberg operators, and the unitary time-evolution operator [21]. If the evolution of the system is unitary, the unitary time-evolution operator method is perhaps the simplest one among these methods. Furthermore, the eigenstates for our considered Hamiltonian are easy to find, which can help us to obtain the unitary evolution results. These eigenstates are called the “dressed” states [22]. Therefore, the method we used here is called the dressed-state method. This is appropriate to our present system.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the considered theoretical model and the dressed-state method to solve this model are introduced. In Section 3, we make a brief review of the related properties for the atom and the field. In Sections 4, 5 and 6, we study the dynamical behavior for the atom and the field under the three cases of initial conditions, i.e., assuming that the atom is initially in the ground state and the field is initially in the Fock state, the coherent state, and the thermal state, respectively. For every properties, we give their explicit expressions and make numerical simulations. Conclusions are summarized in the last section.
2 Theoretical Model and Dressed State Method
The effective Hamiltonian representing two-photon absorption and emission between two-level atom can be given by
where we think it as a resonant two-photon extension of the Jaynes-Cummings model in view of their similarity. In terms of the field number states, the interaction term in H e f f causes only transitions of the types
The production states |e,n〉, |g,n + 2〉 (n ≥ 0) are sometimes referred as the “bare” states, who are product states of the unperturbed atom and field. For a fixed n, the dynamics is completely confined to the two-dimensional Hilbert space H(n) (n ≥ 0, also n + 2 ≥ 2) of product states, i.e. |e,n〉, |g,n + 2〉. Obviously, |e,n〉 and |g,n + 2〉 are orthogonal. Using this basis in the 2 × 2 subspace, we obtain the matrix representation of H e f f ,
This matrix is “self-contained” since the dynamics connects only those states for which the photon number changes by ± 2. For the cases |g,0〉 or |g,1〉, we find that H e f f |g,0〉 = 0 and H e f f |g,1〉 = 0, which are the special point in our considered model.
For a given n, the energy eigenvalues of \(H_{eff}^{\left (n\right ) }\) are as follows
The eigenstates \(\left \vert \psi _{+}^{\left (n\right ) }\right \rangle \) (\(\left \vert \psi _{-}^{\left (n\right ) }\right \rangle \) ) associated with the energy eigenvalues \(E_{+}^{\left (n\right ) }\) (\(E_{-}^{\left (n\right ) } \)) , satisfying the following eigen equation
are given by in the dressed state basis
which can be recast back into the more familiar “bare” state basis
The variation of the dressed energies as a function of η is represented in Fig. 1. The dressed energies (\(E_{+}^{\left (n\right ) }\) and \(E_{-}^{\left (n\right ) }\)) are the linear functions of the interaction parameter η with the respective slope \(\pm \hbar \sqrt {\left (n + 1\right ) \left (n + 2\right ) }\) for different n. For no interaction η = 0, the energy \(E_{+}^{\left (n\right ) }=E_{-}^{\left (n\right ) }= 0\).
Using the dressed-state method, the exact solution to the atom-field interaction problem can be obtained cleverly. This process has the following steps: (1) Expanding the initial density operator into the bare-state form and then changing it into the dressed-state form; (2) Operating the unitary operator (related to the effective Hamiltonian) on the initial density operator and obtaining the evoluted density operator in the dressed-state form; (3) Recasting the evoluted density operator back into the bare-state form and obtaining the total atom-field density operator at arbitrary time.
3 Properties for the Atom and the Optical Field
The total atom-field density operator ρ A F (t) at arbitrary time can be obtained after making the unitary operator \(\exp \left (-\frac {i}{\hbar }H_{eff}t\right ) \) on the initial density operator ρ A F (0), that is
Hence, all the physically relevant quantities to the quantized field and the atom can be obtained from the density operator ρ A F (t). In other words, this total density operator will give us a complete description of our considered dynamical behavior.
3.1 For Atom
The reduced density operator of the atom is found by tracing over the field state
From (9), we can obtain the expressions
which represent the probabilities (or populations) that, at time t, the atom is in levels |e〉 and |g〉, respectively. Another important quantity is the atomic inversion, related to P e (t) and P g (t) by the expression
where it is satisfied the condition P e (t) + P g (t) = 1.
3.2 For Field
Tracing over the atomic states, we obtain the reduced density operator of the field
In order to exhibit the characteristic of the evoluted optical fields, we discuss their properties, including the photon number distribution, the mean photon number, the second-order correlation function and the Wigner function in this paper. Next we make a brief introduction for these properties.
3.2.1 Photon Number Distribution
The probability \(p_{n_{p}}\left (t\right ) \), that there are n p photons in the optical field at time t, is given as
i.e. photon number distribution, which must satisfy \(\sum _{n_{p}= 0}^{\infty }p_{n_{p}}\left (t\right ) = 1\).
3.2.2 Mean Photon Number and Second-Order Correlation Function
The mean photon number and second-order correlation function of the optical field are given by
and
respectively [23]. The effect is antibunching when g(2) < 1 (strictly nonclassical), and bunching (superbunching) if 1 ≤ g(2)(0) ≤ 2 (g(2)(0) > 2). Obviously, g(2) = 1 (Poissonian statistics) for a coherent state |α〉; g(2) = 2 for a thermal state; and g(2) = 0 when n = 0, 1 and g(2) = 1 − 1/n when n ≥ 2 for Fock state |n〉.
3.2.3 Wigner Function
In order to obtain a phase space distribution for a quantum particle, Wigner proposed firstly a function (i.e. Wigner function) in 1932, which is resembling as closely as possible the probability distribution of classical statistical physics [24]. The Wigner function of the optical field ρ F at the point in phase space is
whose complex-number coordinate is \(\xi =\left (x+iy\right ) /\sqrt {2}\). The integral of the Wigner function over phase space is equal to 1. Moreover, the Wigner function can take negative values in regions of the phase space, which is a signature of non-classical behavior for the corresponding state.
It is well known that the density operator for any quantum state can be expressed the form in Fock state, i.e. \(\rho _{F}=\sum _{n,m}p_{nm}\left \vert n\right \rangle \left \langle m\right \vert \) with p n m = 〈n|ρ F |m〉. Hence, in order to calculate the Wigner function for any quantum state, we firstly derive the Wigner function for the operator |n〉〈m|, whose general expression can be written as
The detailed derivation process is in the Appendix.
In fact, the situation is considerably simpler if initially the atom is in the excited state |e〉. However, in the next three sections of this paper, we assume that the atom is initially in the ground state |g〉. Moreover, we assume that the initial optical field is in the photon number state, the coherent state, and the thermal state, respectively.
4 Dynamics Evolution for Initial Case I: |ψ(0)〉 = |g,n〉
Assuming the atom initially in the ground state |g〉 and the field initially in a Fock state |n〉, i.e.
then the state vector for times t > 0 is just given by
For the cases with the initial state |ψ(0)〉 = |g,0〉 or |ψ(0)〉 = |g,1〉, we have
i.e. the eigenvalue in these cases is zero, and then
leading to
For cases n ≥ 2, noticing (4), (5) and (6), we have
After recasting back into the more familiar “bare” state basis by simplify substituting \(\left \vert \psi _{\pm }^{\left (n-2\right ) }\right \rangle \) from (6), we have
whose conjugate state is
Thus the total density operator ρ A F (t)|n≥ 2 = |ψ(t)〉〈ψ(t)| can be further expressed as
4.1 Properties of Atom for Initial Case I
The reduced density operator of the atom is found
which leads to the populations of the excited and ground states,
respectively, and satisfying P e (t) + P g (t) = 1. The atomic inversion is given by
Noticing for the cases n = 0 or n = 1, we alway have P e (t) = 0, P g (t) = 1, and W(t) = − 1. These are cases for the n-photon inversion. In Fig. 2, we plot the populations (P e (t), P g (t)) and the atomic inversion W(t) as a function of the scaled time ηt for different initial n. Obviously, they are all strictly periodic functions of the evolution timeηt with a quantum Rabi frequency \(2\sqrt {n\left (n-1\right ) }\) (different from that frequency \(2\sqrt {n}\) in the Jaynes-Cummings model) related to the different photon number n. The result shows that the behavior of the atomic dynamics for a definite number photons is periodic and regular in our present model.
4.2 Properties of Field for Initial Case I
For cases n = 0 or n = 1, we have ρ F (t)|n= 0 = |0〉〈0| and ρ F (t)|n= 1 = |1〉〈1|, which is independent of the evolution time. While for cases n ≥ 2, the density operator of the optical field is
which is an incoherent superposition state of |n − 2〉〈n − 2| and |n〉〈n| with certain ratio depending on the evolution time.
4.2.1 Photon Number Distribution
The photon number distribution of the optical field evoluted from initial case I has the following characteristics. If n = 0, then we have
Similarly, if n = 1, then we have
Obviously, if the field is initially in |0〉 or |1〉, it will remain in its original state forever.
But when n ≥ 2, we have
In Fig. 3, we plot \(P_{n_{p}}\) versus n p for different number n at different time ηt. For a given initial Fock state |n〉 (n ≥ 2), it will evolve into two components (i.e., |n − 2〉 and |n〉) with the certain ratios depending on the interaction.
4.2.2 Mean Photon Number and Second-Order Autocorrelation Function
For the evoluted optical field in this initial case, we have
and
Obviously, 〈a‡a〉 remains unchanged for n = 0, 1, but is periodic function of ηt when n ≥ 2 (see Fig. 4a). In addition, for n = 0, 1, g(2) is still zero; but when n ≥ 2, g(2) is not always equal to 1 − 1/n, but depends on n and ηt, as shown in Fig. 4b.
4.2.3 Wigner Function
The Wigner function of the Fock state |n〉 can be expressed as
It is a non-Gaussian function in the form because of the existence of the Lagurrel function, except the vacuum state |0〉.
Using (17), we obtain the time evolution of the Wigner function in this case expressed as
As shown in Fig. 5, the Wigner function is symmetrical in phase space and can take negative values in some regions.
5 Dynamics Evolution for Initial Case II: |ψ(0)〉 = |g,α〉
Assuming the atom initially in the ground state |g〉 and the field initially in a coherent state |α〉. Since the coherent state can be expanded as \(\left \vert \alpha \right \rangle =\sum _{n = 0}^{\infty }C_{n}\left \vert n\right \rangle \) with the coefficient \(C_{n}=e^{-\left \vert \alpha \right \vert ^{2}/2}\alpha ^{n}/\sqrt {n!}\), then the initial state vector
will evolve into the state vector
for times t > 0. Using the similar steps in above section, we have
with its corresponding conjugate state
Thus the total density operator ρ A F (t) = |ψ(t)〉〈ψ(t)| can be written as
5.1 Properties of Atom for Initial Case II:
The reduced density operator of the atom is
leading to the populations of the excite and ground state
Here, we can verify that P e (t) + P g (t) = 1 and obtain the atom inversion
The result is just the sum of n-photon inversion weighted with the photon number distribution of the initial coherent state. For convenience, we set \(C_{n}=C_{n}^{\ast }=\sqrt {\frac {\bar {n}^{n}}{n!}e^{-\bar {n}}}\) for the coherent state |α〉 with \(\alpha =\left \vert \alpha \right \vert e^{i\theta }=\sqrt {\bar {n}}e^{i\theta }\) (\(\bar {n}\) denotes the mean photon number and let 𝜃 = 0 here) in our following simulation.
Plots of P e (t), P g (t), W(t) versus the scaled time ηt are shown in Fig. 6 for an initial coherent state with different \(\bar {n}\). It is astonishing that their behaviors for an initial coherent state are quite different from that for an initial Fock state, i.e. quantum Rabi oscillations. Furthermore, for a moderate \(\bar {n}\), the time evolution of the populations and the inversion shows the well-known collapse and revival.
5.2 Properties of Field for Initial Case II
The reduced density operator of the field is
5.2.1 Photon Number Distribution
The photon number distribution for this case can be described as follows
In Fig. 7, we plot \(P_{n_{p}}\left (t\right ) \) for an initial coherent state. As \(\bar {n}\) increases, the distribution is wider. Moreover, some oscillation will exhibit at certain time.
5.2.2 Mean Photon Number and Second-Order Autocorrelation Function
From (46), we have
and
In Fig. 8, we plot 〈a‡a〉 and g(2) versus ηt for an initial coherent state with different \(\bar {n}\). Obviously, the mean photon number almost do not change over time, accompanying by slight fluctuations. The second-order correlation function is changing up and down in the vicinity of the value 1, i.e. that of the original coherent state. Besides, if the value of \(\bar {n}\) is large enough, g(2) is just equal to 1.
5.2.3 Wigner Function
The Wigner function of the coherent state |α〉 can be expressed as
who is a Gaussian function and have no chance to take negative region in phase space. After the interaction, the Wigner function is evolved into
However, the Wigner function evolved from the initial coherent state can take negative values in some regions of the phase space, as shown in Fig. 9.
It should be noted that, since the infinite series in above expressions cannot be summed exactly in these cases, we will cut the sum superior in a certain number in our numerical analysis. This will lead to some deviation, but will not affect the analysis results.
6 Dynamics Evolution for Initial Case III: ρ(0) = |g〉〈g| ⊗ ρ t h
Assuming the atom initially in the ground state |g〉 and the field initially in a thermal state ρ t h (a mixed state), i.e.
with
where \(\bar {n}\) is the mean photon number of the thermal state, that is
then the density operator for times t > 0 is just given by
Through (5) and (10), we easily obtain the total atom-field density operator
6.1 Properties of Atom for Initial Case III
The reduced density operator for atom is
leading to
and
In Fig. 10, we plot P e (t), P g (t), W(t) versus ηt for a thermal field containing different \(\bar {n}\). In this case, we don’t find the phenomena of the quantum Rabi Oscillations found in Case I or the collapse or revival found in case II. In addition, as \(\bar {n}\) increases, the atom has a tendency of populating in the excited state and the ground state with equal possibility.
6.2 Properties of Field for Initial Case III
The reduced density operator for the field in case III is
6.2.1 Photon Number Distribution
The photon number distribution for this case can be expressed as follows
In Fig. 11, \(P_{n_{p}}\left (t\right ) \) for initial thermal states with different \(\bar {n}\) are plotted at different time ηt. As \(\bar {n} \) increases, the distribution becomes wider. Moreover, the distribution will exhibit oscillation at certain time.
6.2.2 Mean Photon Number and Second-Order Autocorrelation Function
From (60), we have
and
In Fig. 12, we plot 〈a‡a〉 and g(2) versus ηt for an initial thermal state with different \(\bar {n}\). Obviously, the mean photon number almost do not change over time. The second-order correlation function is slightly bigger or equal to 2, i.e. that of the original thermal state.
6.2.3 Wigner Function
The Wigner function of the thermal state ρ t h can be expressed as
It is also the Gaussian function and has no chance to take negative region in phase space. The Wigner function of ρ F (t) in case III is written as
As Fig. 13 shows, the Wigner function loses the character of Gaussian form and appears some shock in phase space.
7 Conclusion
In summary, we study the dynamical evolution of the properties for the atoms and the fields in the process of two-photon absorption and emission between two atomic levels. Using the eigenstates of the effective Hamiltonian describing the process, we construct the connection between the dressed state and the bare state. Thus we cleverly obtain the density operator of the system at any time once the initial density operator is known. Through the paper, we discuss three cases of initial density operator for the atom-field system, i.e. the atom is initially in the ground state and the optical field is initially in Fock state, coherent state and thermal state, respectively.
For every property under consideration, we give the explicit analytical expressions and make the numerical simulation. Some interesting results are obtained. The phenomenon of quantum Rabi oscillation and collapse and revival for the atom will appear when the proper initial optical field is injected. This character is similar to that in Jaynes-Cummings model. However, one main difference is that the factor in our model is \(\sqrt {n\left (n-1\right ) }\eta t\) and the factor in Jaynes-Cummings model is \(\sqrt {n}\eta t\). In addition, some new optical fields can be generated in our considered process. For instance, after injecting Fock state |n〉 in the process, we generate the incoherent superposition state of |n − 2〉 and |n〉, whose ratio can be adjusted by the interaction time. So this process is also effective in the quantum state engineering.
References
Scully, M.O., Zubairy, M.S.: Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Walls, D.F., Milburn, G.J.: Quantum optics. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Orszag, M.: Quantum optics. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Gerry, C.C., Knight, P.: Introductory Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Barnett, S.M., Radmore, P.M.: Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics. Claredon Press, Oxford (1997)
Haroche, S., Raimond, J.M.: Exploring the quantum: Atoms, Cavities and Photons. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Meystre, P., Sargent, M. III: Element of quantum optics. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Dupont-Roc, J., Grynberg, G.: Atom-Photon Interactions. Wiley, New York (1992)
Weissbluth, M.: Photon-Atom Interactions. Academic Press, New York (1989)
Allen, L., Eberly, J.H.: Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms. Wiley, New York (1975)
Eberly, J.H., Narozhny, N.B., Sanchez-Mondragon, J.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323–1326 (1980)
Narozhny, N.B., Sanchez-Mondragon, J.J., Eberly, J.H.: Phys. Rev. A 23, 236–247 (1981)
Jaynes, E.T., Cummings, F.W.: Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. 51, 89–109 (1963)
Cummings, F.W.: Phys. Rev. 149, A1051–A1056 (1965)
Knight, P.L., Radmore, P.M.: Phys. Rev. A 26, 676–679 (1982)
Rabi, I.I.: Phys. Rev. 51, 652–654 (1937)
Dell’Anno, F., De Siena, S., Illuminati, F.: Phys. Rep. 428, 53–168 (2006)
Yoo, H.J., Eberly, J.H.: Phys. Rep. 118, 239–337 (1985)
Shore, B.W., Knight, P.L.: J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195–1238 (1993)
Messina, A., Maniscalco, S., Napoli, A.: J. Mod. Opt. 50, 1–49 (2003)
Schleich, W.P.: Quantum Optics in Phase Space. Wiley-Vch Verlag, Berlin (2001)
Knight, P.L., Milonni, P.W.: Phys. Rep. 66, 21–107 (1980)
Allen, L., Knight, P.L.: Concepts of Quantum Optics. Pergamon, Oxford (1983)
Wigner, E.P.: Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11665013).
Appendix: Wigner function for the operator |n〉〈m|
Appendix: Wigner function for the operator |n〉〈m|
Substituting
into (17), we have
Inserting the completeness of the coherent states, i.e. \(\int \frac {d^{2}z_{1} }{\pi }\left \vert z_{1}\right \rangle \left \langle z_{1}\right \vert = 1\) and \(\int \frac {d^{2}z_{2}}{\pi }\left \vert z_{2}\right \rangle \left \langle z_{2}\right \vert = 1\), we have
After employing the integration, we obtain the Wigner function for the operator |n〉〈m|,
Using this expression, the Wigner function for any quantum state can be expressed based on its expansion in Fock state space.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Jm., Xu, Xx. Dynamical Evolution of Properties for Atom and Field in the Process of Two-Photon Absorption and Emission Between Atomic Levels. Int J Theor Phys 57, 2167–2191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-018-3741-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-018-3741-3