Abstract
To understand how Neotropical freshwater fishes (NFF) benefit society, we conducted a broad literature survey to (i) map and list the ecosystem services (ES) generated by these organisms, and (ii) investigate how human activities have affected the ecosystem service chain. We found sound evidence that NFF contribute directly and indirectly to the generation of several provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services. Provisioning services have been widely recognized, especially those related to fisheries, but this class also included ornamental fish, genetic pools, medicines, aquaculture, and bioindicators. Other services remain less understood and largely ignored by society. Regulating services included seed dispersal, decomposition, and top-down control, while supporting services included nutrient cycling, habitat quality, and ecosystem engineering. Cultural services associated with NFF included recreational fishing, tourism, fishkeeping, education, production of scientific knowledge, in addition to values linked to traditional communities, such as local knowledge, cosmology, and existential foundations. Human activities have negatively impacted the generation of ES, especially those related to fishing and food provisioning. This review indicates that Neotropical fishes benefit society in multiple ways, but it is imperative to improve our understanding about those benefits, and to increase conservation efforts directed to this important component of global biodiversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The diversity of Neotropical freshwater fishes (hereafter NFF) is extraordinary among vertebrates, unparalleled to any other zoogeographic region (Tonella et al., 2022). More than 6000 species have been described (Albert et al., 2020), representing about 1/3 of all freshwater fish species on the Planet (sensu Fricke et al., 2021). Such diversity, however, cannot be assessed solely by the number of species, as it entails a variety of forms, sizes, behaviors, distributions, and origins. These aspects naturally translate into high levels of phylogenetic and functional diversity (Toussaint et al., 2016), resulting in fish species generating important ecosystem functions and benefits to human societies (Taylor et al., 2006). These facets, however, have been little studied and understood (Vitule et al., 2017); ecosystem services (ES) have been an undervalued topic, probably because the concept is more recent, complex, and some dimensions are still difficult to assess/quantify (La Notte et al., 2017).
Ecosystem services represent the contact between natural resources and society (Díaz et al., 2015). Freshwater fish, in general, generate different services (Holmlund & Hammer, 1999) and contribute to multiple dimensions of human well-being (i.e., material, relational, and subjective; Cooke et al., 2016; McIntyre et al., 2016; IPBES, 2019). The importance of NFF to fishing and fishery products are well known, as they represent important economic resources for many countries and are exported worldwide. They also play an essential role in alleviating poverty in Latin America, as fish provide food, income, and capital for millions of families (FAO, 2018). However, NFF generate several other services, many of which are unrelated to fisheries but critical to support human activities. They include different types of provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services (e.g., Taylor et al., 2006; Correa et al., 2007; Garnelo, 2007; Helfman, 2007; McIntyre et al., 2008; Olden et al., 2020), which generate direct and indirect benefits of economic and non-economic values. However, these services have received less attention than those related to fisheries and, in most cases, they remain largely unappreciated or even ignored by society. The common utilitarian view contributes to eclipse the perception of the multiple beneficial aspects associated with fish diversity (Obregón et al., 2018; WWF, 2021). Improving our understanding about this topic is crucial considering the degradation of aquatic ecosystems and the erosion of NFF in the Anthropocene (Reis et al., 2016; Pelicice et al., 2017; Azevedo-Santos et al., 2021). The loss of fishery resources has been notorious (Hoeinghaus et al., 2009; Scarabotti et al., 2021), but lack of knowledge has made it difficult for society to assess the degradation and loss of other services provided by NFF. The scenario is unfavorable as public policies and development plans in Latin America (also globally) have not targeted the maintenance of ES critical to humanity. People generally are unaware of the concept of ES, and fail to recognize the benefits deriving from ecological processes that have no immediate economic relevance (Blanco et al., 2022).
Some reviews have examined the role of fish in providing ecosystem services worldwide (Holmlund & Hammer, 1999; Olden et al., 2020), but none has compiled studies on ES generated by NFF, so the actual extent of their benefits remains largely unknown. As there is a natural bias toward services related to fishing (e.g., Obregón et al., 2018; Olden et al., 2020), it is essential to identify and understand the existence of other services to clarify their occurrence, relevance, and gaps in knowledge, guiding research and sustainable policies. In this sense, this review aims to map the ES generated by NFF and understand how fish benefit society. Based on a broad literature survey, we sought evidence of ES considering the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment framework (MEA, 2005), which groups services into four classes, i.e., provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural. This review (i) organizes and lists the ES generated by NFF, and (ii) gathers evidence of how human activities have affected the ecosystem service chain provided by fishes. Our study clearly shows that fish contribute to the generation of several services far beyond those associated with fishing (Fig. 1), including services that are poorly known but critical for society.
Material and methods
We examined the existing scientific literature to synthesize the current knowledge about ecosystem services associated with NFF. This review is based on multiple and exhaustive literature surveys conducted on Web of Science (www.webofknowledge.com), Scopus (www.socpus.com), and Google (www.google.com). Different terms (and combinations) were employed, and they included “Neotropical,” “South America,” “fish,” “freshwater,” “service,” “fishing,” “fisheries,” “nutrient,” “dispersal,” “cultural,” among several others related to the ES topic. These surveys were conducted independently by each author between August 2021 and March 2022, and potential references were selected, debated, and eventually cited. Author’s personal libraries were another source of references (scientific articles and books).
Based on the evidence provided by the literature, we identified all ES associated with NFF and organized each service as provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural, following the framework of MEA (2005). The literature search also supported the investigation of impacts caused by human activities on the generation of ecosystem services.
Ecosystem services provided by NFF
We found sound scientific evidence (direct and indirect) that NFF generate a range of ES (Table 1 and Fig. 2), including the four classes of MEA (2005). Some services are well known and widely recognized, such as those related to fisheries, fish production, and recreation. Other services deliver critical benefits to human activities (e.g., nutrient cycling, decomposition, seed dispersal), while many have cultural value. Some require further research to determine their mechanisms and relevance (e.g., pest control, invasion resistance), while others lack scientific evidence, either because they are probably not generated by fish (e.g., primary production), or because they have never been studied (e.g., water purification, soil formation, climate regulation). A quick search on the Web of Science database (https://www.webofknowledge.com), examining the scientific articles citing the main references in the field (i.e., Holmlund & Hammer, 1999), indicated that ES provided by NFF have received little attention: studies on NFF accounted for a small fraction of this literature (8.7% of the references; 334 papers on June 2022), and most of them are related to studies conducted in Brazil. Therefore, both the range of services and the role of fish are probably underestimated; some links remain undiscovered, whereas others are potential, but their demonstration is still a challenge.
Provisioning services
Provisioning services are the best studied and known. It includes several services related to fisheries, which play a key role in the provision of food and animal protein (Fig. 2A), generating income, and alleviating poverty in Latin America. Inland fishing is a global activity with strong social, environmental, and political significance (Lynch et al., 2016; FAO, 2018). In the Neotropical region, inland fisheries are found in every freshwater ecosystem (Fig. 3), involving different modalities (subsistence, recreational, artisanal, commercial, or industrial) and capturing a wide variety of species. This activity is important to countries that lack access to the ocean, such as Paraguay and Bolivia (Funge-Smith & Bennet, 2019), and remarkable in major rivers systems, such as the Magdalena-Cauca, La Plata, São Francisco, and Amazonas basins (Almeida et al., 2001; Petrere Jr. et al., 2002; Godinho & Godinho, 2003; Junk, 2007; FAO, 2015; Hallwass & Silvano, 2016; Lopes et al., 2016; Scarabotti et al., 2021), where it generates food, employment, and income for millions of people. Inland fisheries in the neotropics employ 3% of the employees around the world. This proportion is a small amount in comparison with South Asia and Africa (58 and 16%, respectively), but still generates around 500 thousand jobs (Funge-Smith & Bennet, 2019). Traditional communities rely strongly on fishery resources (Nietschmann, 1972; Gross, 1975; Santos & Alves, 2016), especially for their food security (Tregidgo et al., 2020), an aspect that confirms the social importance of NFF (e.g., FAO, 2018).
Migratory fishes (Fig. 2C, E) represent a valuable resource with great importance for inland fisheries and ecosystem functioning (Hoeinghaus et al., 2009; Flecker et al., 2010). Thousands of tons of migratory fish are landed annually in the Amazon region (Duponchelle et al., 2021) and in the La Plata Basin (Okada et al., 2005; Scarabotti et al., 2021), supplying regional markets and exports. Migratory fishes are iconic animals and include large catfishes [(e.g., Pseudoplatystoma corruscans (Spix & Agassiz, 1829), Brachyplatystoma rosseauxii (Castelnau, 1855), Zungaro zungaro (Humboldt, 1821)] and characins [e.g., Salminus brasiliensis (Cuvier 1816), Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887), Prochilodus nigricans Spix & Agassiz, 1829] (Barthem & Goulding, 1997; Carolsfeld et al., 2003). Small fish, a group highly diverse and widely distributed in the region (Castro & Polaz, 2020), also represent an important resource appreciated as food, bait, or ornamental. The ornamental fish industry moves billions of dollars annually (Dey, 2016), and the diversity of NFF has strong appeal (Sabaj-Perez, 2015; Evers et al., 2019; Ladislau et al., 2020; Tribuzy-Neto et al., 2020; Sousa et al., 2021; Novak et al., 2022); its potential is well-recognized (Axelrod et al., 1997), but often under-exploited (Pelicice & Agostinho, 2005). There are other economic uses of NFF, such as the manufacture of handicrafts, tools, and decorative objects (Fig. 2B) (Gonçalves et al., 2012; Olden et al., 2020), which involve, for example, the use of small Loricariidae and Serrasalmidae species, the tail of stingrays (Potamotrygonidae), catfish spines, and scales of pirarucu [Arapaima gigas (Schinz, 1822)]. The production of fish leather to make clothes, shoes and accessories has been appreciated in the market and in the fashion industry, especially due to its sustainability appeal; it may include farmed fish (e.g., A. gigas) or those captured by artisanal fisheries (e.g., Prochilodus spp.). Fishing by-products also have multiple uses, including oil and meal to feed other animals, and exports (head, tails, and bladders) to attend international markets (Barone et al., 2017). We emphasize also that inland fisheries develop complex production chains, involving different equipment (e.g., vessels, engines, fishing gears), activities (e.g., transport, storage, processing) and stakeholders (e.g., fishers, retailers, export), which employ millions of people directly and indirectly.
Although all fishing modalities target some main species (Freire et al., 2016; Hallwass & Silvano, 2016), inland fisheries in the Neotropical region are essentially multi-specific, especially small-scale artisanal activities (Tregidgo et al., 2021). Thus, the high diversity of NFF must create an insurance effect for fisheries, dumping oscillations of specific stocks against disturbances and natural variation, an important mechanism to maintain fishery production. This service is reasonable in situations of stock depletion due to overfishing, when underexploited stocks compensate for diminishing returns (e.g., Myers & Worm, 2003). Insurance effects may also work in regulated rivers, when migratory species decline and the fishery system adapts to exploit sedentary species (Agostinho et al., 2016).
Fish diversity also constitutes an important genetic pool (Wasko et al., 2004; Hillsdorf & Hallerman, 2017), serving as a subsidy for several activities. It supplies aquaculture stocks with wild fish (Oliveira et al., 2018; Torati et al., 2019) and offers regional alternatives for aquaculture development (Fonseca et al., 2017; Lima Junior et al., 2018; Dávila-Camacho et al., 2019; Val & Oliveira, 2021). However, the potential use of NFF in aquaculture has been greatly overlooked, given the predominance of non-native fish in the aquaculture industry, such as carps [e.g., Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844)], African clariid catfishes [Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)], and tilapias [Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)] (Azevedo-Santos et al., 2011; Valenti et al., 2021). One important exception is the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1816), a species native to the Amazon, which represents about 20% of fish production in Brazil (Valenti et al., 2021). Neotropical fishes also generate goods related to the provision of chemical and medicinal compounds (Alves & Rosa, 2006; Magalhães et al., 2006; Padilla et al., 2012; Cavali et al., 2022), although these products remain less studied and understood. The use of fish in healing practices and health issues is more common in traditional communities, or in those whose access to conventional medicine is more restricted (Thé et al., 2003; Barros et al., 2012).
Neotropical fishes (the species or the community) have also been used as tools in impact assessment and monitoring studies, working as bioindicators of environmental quality. Most species have specific ecological requirements, especially rheophilic and migratory fish, being sensitive to human impacts and constituting sentinels of environmental change. They have been useful to indicate impacts emerging from land conversion (e.g., Carvalho et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017; Guimarães et al., 2022), deforestation (Arantes et al., 2018; Prudente et al., 2018), fishing (Doria et al., 2017; Röpke et al., 2022), river regulation (Araújo et al., 2018), climate change (Lopes et al., 2017; Borba et al., 2021), and environmental contamination (Maggioni et al., 2012; Viana & Lucena Frédou, 2014; Schulz & Martins-Junior, 2001; de Carvalho et al., 2020; Gutiérrez & Agudelo, 2020; Henriques et al., 2021; Pinto et al., 2021). However, protocols to use NFF as bioindicators are still incipient, requiring more research and development.
Regulating services
NFF contribute with the generation of services associated with ecosystem functioning, with direct and indirect benefits to society. For example, seed dispersal represents an essential service, probably of wide occurrence. Several species consume fruits in riparian areas of rivers, lakes, and floodplains (Fig. 4), contributing to seed dispersal and the maintenance of riparian vegetation (Souza-Stevaux, 1994; Correa et al., 2007; Reys et al., 2009; Horn et al., 2011; Barbosa & Montag, 2017). The relative importance of fish compared to other vertebrates is unknown, but the diversity of frugivorous species is disproportionally high in the Neotropical realm (ca. 104 species from 17 families; Correa et al., 2007), indicating that seed dispersal is a common service (Anderson et al., 2009). Another essential ES generated by fish is the decomposition of organic matter. Many NFF specialized in feeding on detritus and decaying organic matter (Bowen, 1983), such as Prochilodontidae, Curimatidae, and Loricariidae (Fig. 4). These fishes consume particulate material and debris deposited on bottom and other substrates (Fig. 2C), acting directly on the decomposition of organic matter and nutrient cycling (Delariva & Agostinho, 2001; Vanni et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2006). Other fish contribute indirectly to the decomposition process, such as scavengers [e.g., piranhas, the catfish Calophysus macropterus (Lichtenstein 1819), and some trichomycterid and cetopsid catfishes] and generalists that fragment plant and animal food in the water column (e.g., small characins) or revolve the substrate (e.g., cichlids, stingrays, and catfishes). These processes accelerate decomposition by making resources available to other consumers and decomposers, which are especially important along the river continuum (Vannote et al., 1980).
Another relevant service occurs through herbivory and the control of vegetation growth. Although the consumption of living plants (except flowers, fruits, and seeds) is not typical among NFF (Goulding, 1980; Okeyo, 1989). However, this service assumes great relevance in the control of filamentous algae and periphyton, affecting nutrient dynamics, habitat quality, and system state. Experiments show that fish that scrape substrates (i.e., Loricariidae, Prochilodus; Fig. 4) exert strong control over periphyton and algae, affecting a series of physical and chemical parameters, in addition to nutrient release, carbon cycling, sediment deposition, and primary production (Flecker, 1996; Taylor et al., 2006; Winemiller et al., 2006). As these fish are abundant and widely distributed in river systems of South America, they must have strong effects on ecosystem functioning and dynamics, keeping rivers and lakes in a certain regime (Mormul et al., 2012).
Many regulating services potentially generated by NFF are controversial or lack sound evidence, demanding more research. For example, the use of fish as biocontrol agents has been a frequent strategy, and several researchers argue that it has positive effects on macrophytes and mosquitoes-borne diseases control (Roux & Robert, 2019). Some species, such as the Trinidadian Guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859, have been extensively used in the control of mosquitoes that transmit diseases, such as malaria and dengue. Although this approach has theoretical and empirical bases (i.e., many fish consume insect larvae), its practical relevance is controversial as a biocontrol tool (Tranchida et al., 2010; Azevedo-Santos et al., 2017). In addition, biocontrol programs have caused the introduction of several non-native fish in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, especially small Poeciliidae (El-Sabaawi et al., 2016). However, the role of native fish controlling some species of Simuliidae and Culicidae in natural conditions cannot be ruled out, as many small fish prey upon insect larvae, with potential to exert demographic control over certain inconvenient blackflies and mosquitoes (e.g., Simulium spp., Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823) (Ibarra-Trujillo & García-Alzate, 2017). The predation of fish on insect larvae can positively affect other services, such as pollination. Experimental evidence indicates that fish can indirectly facilitate the reproduction of terrestrial plants by reducing the abundance of dragonfly larvae in lakes, which prey on pollinating insects as adults (Knight et al., 2005). This indicates a possible service; however, no study investigated the interaction between NFF and pollination. Another potential service is biotic resistance to biological invasion. Some studies suggest that impacted systems, such as regulated rivers or deforested streams, are more susceptible to bio-invasion (Casatti et al., 2009; Pelicice et al., 2018; Bezerra et al., 2019; Santos et al., 2021). The erosion of fish diversity may open space and release resources for invaders, and some studies have indicated the potential of fish to control non-native organisms (Cantanhêde et al., 2008; Oliveira et al., 2010; Isaac et al., 2014). However, the relationship seems to be complex, as other factors mediate biotic resistance or acceptance, such as the origin and ecological traits of the invader, environmental filters, and invasion windows (Fitzgerald et al., 2016; Santos et al., 2018a, b; Muniz et al., 2020). Finally, one cannot ignore the possible role of fish in carbon sequestration and, consequently, in climate regulation. For example, by incorporating carbon from methane in wetlands (Sanseverino et al., 2012), fish biomass may affect this important greenhouse gas emission. No study has demonstrated this process, but considering that some fish accumulate high biomass in certain ecosystems, especially fish occupying lower trophic levels (e.g., Prochilodus and some highly abundant curimatids), the methane sink service seems plausible.
Apparently, some regulation services are not performed directly by NFF, such as water purification, erosion control, and protection against natural disasters. However, one cannot exclude the possibility that fish indirectly affect the generation of these services. For example, algivorous fish and top predators potentially contribute to algae control (through direct and indirect cascading effects), affecting ecosystem properties and supporting some regimes (e.g., clear water state; Scheffer & Carpenter, 2003). This process has been observed in mesocosm experiments, where cascading effects induced by Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794) contribute to improving water quality (Mazzeo et al., 2010).
Supporting services
NFF directly affects nutrient cycling, as they consume different resources (i.e., detritus, plants, and animals), which are digested and recycled as nitrogen and phosphate compounds. This service is essential for maintaining aquatic food webs, and releasing nutrients to primary producers and consumers. Nutrient excretion and cycling are universal processes, although excretion rates vary between fish species and communities (McIntyre et al., 2007, 2008; Small et al., 2011). Moreover, fish are important agents of decomposition, as mentioned before; several species specialized in feeding on detritus and dead organic matter, while small generalist characids, catfishes, and cichlids contribute to mobilizing and fragmenting resources. This process is particularly important in polluted systems, where fish assimilate carbon from untreated domestic sewage (Carvalho et al., 2020). Scrapers (e.g., Prochilodus; Fig. 2C) seem to have strong effects on the environment and regime states (Mormul et al., 2012), affecting ES related to nutrient cycling, microhabitat provision, and water quality. These fish act as ecosystem engineers, with strong top-down control over periphyton and phytoplankton assemblages, affecting nutrient input to the water column (Flecker, 1996; Winemiller et al., 2006; Campos-Silva et al., 2021), the physical structure of microhabitats, and invertebrate dispersion (Flecker, 1992; Flecker & Taylor, 2004). Other ecosystem engineers include fish that modify the substrate by building nests (Bessa et al., 2022), or fish that affect chemical processes in karstic environments (Corrêa et al., 2018). Therefore, fish play a key role in nutrient cycling and habitat quality through different paths and functions.
Fish do not generate some critical supporting services, such as oxygen production, water cycling, and primary production, but they can potentially affect their performance. For example, piscivorous fish can affect primary production through cascading effects (e.g., Campos-Silva et al., 2021), as also demonstrated in controlled experiments (Schindler et al., 1997; Mazzeo et al., 2010). Other services need further investigation. For example, although fish diversity is not directly involved in soil formation, areas of terra preta (black soil) in the Amazon were produced due to the historical deposition of organic material, including fish remains, carried out by traditional communities during the past several thousand years (Kern et al., 2017). These fertile soils are preferred for small-scale agricultural activities, presenting high concentration of organic carbon, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and manganese. In this case, there is a clear connection between terra preta and NFF, although the process may no longer occur due to the historical reduction of indigenous populations over the last centuries.
Cultural services
Neotropical fishes generate a range of cultural services with effects at different spatial scales (i.e., local, regional, and global). Recreational services associated with fishing activities are highly appreciated. Recreational fishing (Fig. 2D) is widespread in the Neotropical region (Freire et al., 2012, 2016), found in different environments where it uses simple gears (e.g., hook, line and rod) to capture different fish species (low selectivity), mostly small-sized. The activity is economically accessible and provides leisure and food, playing an important social role. Sport fishing represents a more specialized segment, which takes advantage of the presence of many large-sized species and predatory fish. The economic sector moves billions of dollars in products, equipment, and tourism, attracting anglers from all over the world. The activity is widespread in the Neotropical region, but some localities are hotspots of sport fishing, such as the Brazilian Pantanal, the lower Paraná River, coastal rivers, and several Amazonian tributaries, such as the Araguaia, Negro, and Tapajós rivers. For example, the recreational value of the region surrounding Aruanã town, Araguaia Basin (Brazil), was estimated at US$ 7.6 billion per year (Angelo & Carvalho, 2008). Similarly, the economic value of recreational fishing focused on snooks (Centropomus spp.) in the lower Ribeira de Iguape River (Brazil) was estimated at US$ 2 million (Barcellini et al., 2013). Iconic species appreciated by recreational and sport fisheries include peacock basses (Cichla spp.), large catfishes (e.g., Pseudoplatystoma spp., Brachyplatystoma spp.), pirarucu (A. gigas), and several characiforms (e.g., Salminus spp., Brycon spp., Piaractus spp., C. macropomum, Megaleporinus spp.).
The high diversity of shapes, colors, sizes, behaviors, and evolutionary histories connect NFF with touristic, esthetic, educational, and scientific values. Snorkeling to observe freshwater fishes [e.g., S. brasiliensis, Brycon microlepis Perugia, 1897, small tetras)] in situ is an important activity in the surrounding highlands of the Brazilian Pantanal (Lima et al., 2014) (Fig. 2F). In some cities, 80% of the tourists are motivated to visit underwater trails in headwater streams, which may raise up to 48% of the revenues associated with tourism (Barbosa & Zamboni, 2000). Snorkeling has also brought economic development and infrastructure to local communities, such as roads and employment (Guimarães & Zavala, 2009). The activity is still small-scale, but has grown in the Neotropical region (Bessa et al., 2017). The ornamental charm of NFF is another important service (Fig. 5), supporting a global ornamental industry (Evers et al., 2019; Valenti et al., 2021). Ornamental NFF are highly appreciated worldwide (Axelrod et al., 1997), supporting hobbyists in the USA, Europe, and Asia, with intense exports of wild fish from the Amazon (Tribuzy-Neto et al., 2020) and Central America (Dávila-Camacho et al., 2019). Fishkeeping, when performed in a correct and sustainable form, is also connected with education—as observed in public aquaria, gardens, ornamental ponds, and scientific collections (Tonini et al., 2016). We emphasize the role NFF in the production of scientific knowledge, as they have served as models to understand physiological issues (e.g., Baldisserotto et al., 2019; Pelster et al., 2021), behavior (e.g., Kowalko, 2020), comparative anatomy (e.g., Diogo et al., 2008), vertebrate evolution (e.g., Monteiro et al., 2018), environmental degradation (e.g., Azevedo-Santos et al., 2021), evolutionary processes, and geological history (e.g., Dagosta & De Pinna, 2017; Albert et al., 2018).
The diversity of NFF is also connected to a series of cultural values related to traditional communities, indigenous groups, and artisanal fishers. These services are among the most relevant benefits generated by NFF, as they have historical roots and developed deep connections with people. The historical importance of fishing for many cultures has supported intimate relationships between people and fish, which has constituted a rich source of sustenance, inspiration, and guidance for men and women (Garnelo, 2007; Cruz-Garcia et al., 2019; Cubillos-Cuadrado et al., 2019; Moreira & Colombier, 2019). Fish is a common source of local ecological knowledge (LEK), playing a key role in the understanding of natural resources, ecological relationships, and the order of Nature (Costa-Neto et al., 2002; Moura & Marques, 2007; Silvano et al., 2008; Carvalho Junior et al., 2011; Braga & Rebelo, 2014). Traditional cultures usually have extensive knowledge about different aspects of NFF, including species identification, behavior, and distribution (Hallwass et al., 2020; Pereyra et al., 2021), being able to indicate potential ES performed by NFF, such as seed dispersal (Silvano et al., 2008) and the structure of food webs (Pereyra et al., 2021). Local knowledge is also valuable to assess environmental impacts, for instance, pollution (Silvano & Begossi, 2016) and river regulation (Hallwass et al., 2013; Baird et al., 2021). Fish also appear in the cosmological systems of many cultures (Harp, 1994; Garnelo, 2007; Oliveira, 2017; Alves et al., 2012; Castro & Barros, 2020), affecting customs and offering a sense of belonging, religious basis, and existential foundations. It is worth noting that the cultural value of NFF is not restricted to traditional communities, as humans naturally appreciate Nature from spiritual and esthetic motivations (Wilson, 1986).
Human impacts and the loss of ES
The impacts of human activities on fish diversity have been well documented (Reis et al., 2016; Pelicice et al., 2017, 2021), including changes in species abundance, diversity patterns, and community structure. However, the consequences on the generation of ES have been less investigated and understood, except for inland fisheries. Multiple stressors, in particular the construction of dams, land conversion, irrigation, mining, species invasion, pollution, and overfishing, have impacted services associated with fishing, causing economic and social losses (Petrere et al., 2004; Hoeinghaus et al., 2009; Agostinho et al., 2016; Kwak et al., 2016; Tregidgo et al., 2017, 2021; Doria et al., 2021). The degradation of fishing resources is widespread, with negative effects on the structure and size of fish stocks, target species, yield, income, costs, and fishing systems, among other indicators. For example, long-term monitoring indicates that main stocks have declined in the La Plata Basin (Rabuffetti et al., 2020; Scarabotti et al., 2021), while fishers recognize that stocks of target species have collapsed in the lower São Francisco basin (D’Ávilla et al., 2021). Even in more pristine regions, such as the Amazon, fishery resources have been degraded or lost (Petrere Jr. et al., 2004; Santos et al., 2018c; Van Damme et al., 2019). The loss of fishery resources has affected the generation of cultural services, such as LEK, since traditional communities have been forced to live in modified environments with altered fish diversity, often with non-native fish (Hallwass et al., 2013; Catelani et al., 2021). Services associated with recreational fisheries have also been degraded, especially in areas affected by dams or overfishing, resulting in the loss of target species with recreational and esthetic value. Signs of vulnerability or even deterioration have been reported even in remote regions that traditionally support high-quality fisheries, such as the Rio Negro basin (Holley et al., 2008; Lubich et al., 2021). The fishing activity itself has impacted NFF (e.g., Petrere Jr. et al., 2004; Tregidgo et al., 2017). Recreational fishing, for example, has affected native fish populations in coastal rivers and brackish waters, due to the lack of official monitoring programs and management strategies that do not consider spatial ecology and biological requirements (e.g., sequential hermaphroditism and diadromous behavior of snooks, Centropomus spp.) (Garrone-Neto et al., 2018). Conflicts between anglers and artisanal fishers have been frequent in different basins, which intensify in degraded environments and mosaics of protected areas, including indigenous lands, with economic and cultural losses for both sides, especially due to the loss of fishing grounds and opportunities for collaborative management (Freire et al., 2016; Motta et al., 2016; Garrone-Neto et al., 2018).
Human activities have affected the generation of other ES and functioning. A series of experiments have demonstrated how the selective removal of scrapers causes intense changes in nutrient cycling, affecting environmental conditions and primary production (Flecker, 1996; Taylor et al., 2006; Winemiller et al., 2006). Some fish, such as Prochilodus and Brachyplatystoma, are particularly vulnerable to human stressors such as overfishing and dam regulation, as they are migratory, rheophilic, and targeted by fisheries (Oliveira et al., 2015; Van Damme et al., 2019; Lopes et al., 2019). The selective removal of Prochilodus stocks, an ongoing process (Baigún et al., 2013; Catarino et al., 2019), has great potential to induce cascading ecosystem changes. Other studies reveal how the erosion of fish diversity affects nitrogen and phosphorus cycling, indicating that non-random extinctions, driven by species identity, size, and biomass (typical effects of fisheries), are more likely to remove species important for nutrient cycling (McIntyre et al., 2006). The decline of frugivorous migratory fish [e.g., C. macropomum, Brycon orbignyanus (Valenciennes, 1849)] has been a growing concern (Costa-Pereira & Galetti, 2015; Tonella et al., 2019), with negative effects on seed dispersal. Deforestation, river regulation, and fishing have impacted their stocks causing depletion and size reduction; however, larger frugivorous fish have disproportionate importance for seed dispersal, as they disperse more seeds of different species, and seeds have greater chances of germination (Correa et al., 2015; Costa-Pereira & Galetti, 2015; Barbosa & Montag, 2017; Araújo et al., 2021). Therefore, the selective removal of this guild should have a strong effect on the regeneration and maintenance of riparian forests and floodplains, with deleterious consequences for ecosystem functioning and biodiversity conservation. This scenario points to possible trade-offs and conflicts among different ES, as the same group of fish may support multiple services (i.e., fishing and seed dispersal), a problem that could be minimized with fishery management and protected areas (Nagl et al., 2021). Potential conflicts in the use of services represent an important knowledge gap. They deserve more research effort, especially to understand the dispute among stakeholders and different fishing modalities, and their interaction with the provision of non-economic services (e.g., seed dispersal, LEK). It is essential to consider that provisioning services delivered by NFF can promote important bridges between regulating and cultural services. It has been shown that the implementation of community-based fisheries management in the Amazon lowlands, based on the controlled and sustainable exploitation of pirarucu A. gigas, favors multiple fish species (and other organisms), and help to reconcile human welfare, biodiversity conservation, and its positive effects on ecosystem functioning (Campos-Silva et al., 2018).
The impact of invasive species on ES remains poorly investigated, but the topic deserves attention as it entails complex tradeoffs between positive and negative consequences for different stakeholders. Multiple non-native species currently invade the Neotropical region (Garcia et al., 2018; Bueno et al., 2021; Doria et al., 2021; Elías et al., 2022; Franco et al., 2022), which have promoted relevant changes in fish diversity in some scenarios (e.g., Pelicice & Agostinho, 2009; Attayde et al., 2011; Vitule et al., 2012; Bezerra et al., 2019). Changes in ES are, therefore, expected. In fact, a recent study revealed how the invasion of the peacock bass Cichla kelberi Kullander & Ferreira, 2006 changed the composition of ecosystem functions and services potentially generated by small fish (Leal et al., 2021), indicating that the erosion of diversity is directly related to the degradation and loss of ES. Furthermore, development plans have relied only on specific economic gains emerging from introductions, ignoring the loss of other services and the associated economic, social, and environmental costs (Magalhães et al., 2018). In this regard, it is essential to understand how invasive fish that generate immediate economic services for aquaculture (e.g., tilapia, carp) and fisheries (e.g., genus Cichla, Arapaima, Micropterus, Oncorhynchus) affect the maintenance of ES generated by native diversity, and how positive/negative effects translate to each stakeholder. For example, the invasion of Nile tilapia O. niloticus is prone to cause several impacts on native biodiversity (Canonico et al., 2005), and this exotic fish generates lower per capita income for artisanal fisheries (Novaes & Carvalho, 2013).
The understanding of how the loss of NFF affects the generation of ES is still deficient, pointing to the need for further research. The focus must go beyond services associated with fisheries since NFF are involved in the generation of several other services with no directly perceived economic value, but are critical for the functioning of ecosystems, traditional communities, and economic activities. The loss of cultural links remains widely ignored by resource management and development plans (e.g., Chiaravalloti & Dyble, 2018), although cultural services are highly vulnerable to environmental degradation. This topic deserves more attention, considering that fish are essential to maintaining social cohesion and identity in traditional societies, affecting the social organization and governance forms. Indigenous and traditional people usually have weak political representation and resilience against large-scale environmental changes (Doria et al., 2018), while they are highly dependent on the fishery resources and other values associated with fish and aquatic ecosystems. Furthermore, the continuous degradation of LEK has resulted in massive cultural losses in the form of valuable empirical and traditional knowledge acquired through the historical interaction between humans and fish. The loss of LEK implies the loss of valuable information about biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and services, which may include data currently unavailable to science, such as long-term abundance trends and species extirpations (Hallwass et al., 2013, 2020). The loss of LEK also negatively impacts the implementation of community-based management strategies and conservation actions that depend on the engagement of local communities.
It is also important to assess the economic value of ES (e.g., Siikamäki et al., 2015; Costanza et al., 2017) using broader quantitative approaches and considering services not linked to immediate economic returns. Few studies have assessed the value of NFF, and they have examined services with direct monetary benefits (e.g., Angelo & Carvalho, 2008; Tribuzy-Neto et al., 2020; Valenti et al., 2021). It is essential to inform society about the direct and indirect economic benefits emerging from NFF, considering that economic and social development has occurred under activities that damage ecosystems, such as energy production and agriculture, which underestimate or ignore the importance of ES for human well-being (Auerbach et al., 2014; Blanco et al., 2022). This aspect is fundamental if we consider that human activities depend on some critical services (e.g., water production, nutrient cycling, and climate regulation), which until recently have not been realized by society. This perspective needs revision, especially because developing nations, home to a disproportionate fraction of biodiversity (particularly freshwater fish), do not prioritize the maintenance of ES and sustainability (Pelicice, 2019). The inclusion of ES in development policies represents a fundamental action toward a more sustainable agenda and compliance with the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations.
Conclusion
This article is the first review of ecosystem services generated by Neotropical freshwater fishes, the most diverse assemblage of vertebrates on Earth. We found robust evidence that fish diversity benefits society in multiple ways through the generation of provisioning, supporting, regulating, and cultural services. The importance of fish for ecosystem functioning is irrefutable since the group colonized virtually all inland aquatic environments in the Neotropical region, where they mobilize energy, accumulate biomass, integrate trophic levels, and interact with humans. However, the current understanding of ES generated by NFF is strongly biased toward fishing activities, which represent a small fraction of existing services. Such bias is reasonable as inland fisheries benefit millions of families by providing food, income, livelihood, capital, and other products. However, the bias eclipses other services, which remain poorly investigated or even unknown to science and society, including critical services for humanity. Therefore, it is imperative to improve our understanding of this topic, which includes questions on how human activities affect ES, and how its loss affects society. Unfortunately, the current knowledge is significantly limited, as we lack answers to basic questions, e.g., how does the loss of certain species (or reductions in abundance and diversity) affect the generation of services? How do specific human actions affect the generation of specific services? What is the economic value of NFF? The loss of ES in the Anthropocene seems to be the norm and predicting its consequences will be fundamental to implementing sustainable policies that protect the natural capital and human activities, which will depend on specific scientific advances in this topic.
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Agostinho, A. A., L. C. Gomes, N. C. L. Santos, J. C. G. Ortega & F. M. Pelicice, 2016. Fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: Colonization patterns, impacts and management. Fisheries Research 173: 26–36.
Albert, J. S., P. Val & C. Hoorn, 2018. The changing course of the Amazon River in the Neogene: Center stage for Neotropical diversification. Neotropical Ichthyology 16: e180033.
Albert, J. S., V. A. Tagliacollo & F. Dagosta, 2020. Diversification of Neotropical freshwater fishes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 51: 27–53.
Almeida, O. T., D. G. McGrath & M. L. Ruffino, 2001. The commercial fisheries of the lower Amazon: An economic analysis. Fisheries Management and Ecology 8: 253–269.
Alves, R. R. N. & I. L. Rosa, 2006. From cnidarians to mammals: The use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 107: 259–276.
Alves, R. R. N., I. L. Rosa, N. A. Léo Neto & R. Voeks, 2012. Animals for the Gods: magical and religious faunal use and trade in Brazil. Human Ecology 40: 751–780.
Anderson, J. T., S. J. Rojas & A. S. Flecker, 2009. High-quality seed dispersal by fruit-eating fishes in Amazonian floodplain habitats. Oecologia 161: 279–290.
Angelo, P. G. & A. R. Carvalho, 2008. Valor recreativo do rio Araguaia, região de Aruanã, estimado pelo método do custo de viagem. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences 29: 421–428.
Arantes, C. C., K. O. Winemiller, M. Petrere, L. Castello, L. L. Hess & C. E. C. Freitas, 2018. Relationships between forest cover and fish diversity in the Amazon River Floodplain. Journal of Applied Ecology 55(1): 386–395.
Araújo, F. G., C. N. Morado, T. T. E. Parente, F. J. R. Paumgartten & I. D. Gomes, 2018. Biomarkers and bioindicators of the environmental condition using a fish species (Pimelodus maculatus Lacepède, 1803) in a tropical reservoir in Southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 78: 351–359.
Araújo, J. M., S. B. Correa, J. Penha, J. Anderson & A. Traveset, 2021. Implications of overfishing of frugivorous fishes for cryptic function loss in a Neotropical floodplain. Journal of Applied Ecology 58: 1499–1510.
Arce-Ibarra, A. M. & A. T. Charles, 2008. Inland fisheries of the Mayan Zone in Quintana Roo, Mexico: Using a combined approach to fishery assessment for data-sparse fisheries. Fisheries 91: 151–159.
Attayde, J. L., J. Brasil & R. A. Menescal, 2011. Impacts of introducing Nile tilapia on the fisheries of a tropical reservoir in North-eastern Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecology 18: 437–443.
Auerbach, D. A., D. B. Deisenroth, R. R. McShane, K. E. McCluney & N. LeRoy Poff, 2014. Beyond the concrete: Accounting for ecosystem services from free-flowing rivers. Ecosystem Services 10: 1–5.
Axelrod, H. R., W. E. Burgess, N. Pronek, & J. G. Walls, 1997. Dr. Axelrod’s Atlas of Freshwater Aquarium Fishes. Ninth ed., Tropical Fish Hobbyist Publications Inc., Neptune City
Azevedo-Santos, V. M., O. Rigolin-Sá & F. M. Pelicice, 2011. Growing, losing or introducing? Cage aquaculture as a vector for the introduction of non-native fish in Furnas Reservoir, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 9: 915–919.
Azevedo-Santos, V. M., J. R. S. Vitule, F. M. Pelicice, E. García-Berthou & D. Simberloff, 2017. Nonnative fish to control Aedes mosquitoes: A controversial, harmful tool. BioScience 67: 84–90.
Azevedo-Santos, V. M., M. S. Arcifa, M. F. G. Brito, A. A. Agostinho, R. M. Hughes, J. R. S. Vitule, D. Simberloff, J. D. Olden & F. M. Pelicice, 2021. Negative impacts of mining on Neotropical freshwater fishes. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e210001.
Baigún, C., P. Minotti & N. Oldani, 2013. Assessment of sábalo (Prochilodus lineatus) fisheries in the lower Paraná River basin (Argentina) based on hydrological, biological, and fishery indicators. Neotropical Ichthyology 11: 199–210.
Baird, I. G., R. A. M. Silvano, B. Parlee, M. Poesch, B. Maclean, A. Napoleon, M. Lepine & G. Hallwass, 2021. The downstream impacts of hydropower dams and indigenous and local knowledge: examples from the Peace-Athabasca, Mekong, and Amazon. Environmental Management 67: 682–696.
Baldisserotto, B., E. Urbinati & J. Cyrino, 2019. Biology and physiology of freshwater Neotropical fish, Academic Press:
Barbosa, M. A. C. & R. A. Zamboni, 2000. Formação de um 'cluster' em torno do turismo de natureza sustentável em Bonito–MS. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Brasília-DF
Barcellini, V. C., F. S. Motta, A. M. Martins & P. S. Moro, 2013. Recreational anglers and fishing guides from an estuarine protected area in southeastern Brazil: Socioeconomic characteristics and views on fisheries management. Ocean and Coastal Management 76: 23–29.
Barone, R. S. C., E. K. Lorenz, D. Y. Sonoda & J. E. P. Cyrino, 2017. Fish and fishery products trade in Brazil, 2005 to 2015: A review of available data and trends. Scientia Agricola 74: 417–424.
Barros, F. B., S. A. M. Varela, H. M. Pereira & L. Vicente, 2012. Medicinal use of fauna by a traditional community in the Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8: 37.
Barthem, R. B. & M. Goulding, 1997. The Catfish Connection: ecology, migration, and conservation of Amazon predators, Columbia University Press, New York:
Bessa, E., F. Silva & F. & J. Sabino, 2017. Impacts of fish tourism. In Blumstein, D. T., B. Geffroy, D. S. M. Samia & E. Bessa (eds), Ecotourism’s promise and peril: a biological evaluation Springer, Cham: 59–72.
Bessa, E., M. L. Brandão & E. Gonçalves-de-Freitas, 2022. Integrative approach on the diversity of nesting behaviour in fishes. Fish and Fisheries 23(3): 564–583.
Bezerra, L. A. V., V. M. Ribeiro, M. O. Freitas, L. Kaufman, A. A. Padial & J. R. S. Vitule, 2019. Benthification, biotic homogenization behind the trophic downgrading in altered ecosystems. Ecosphere 10: e02757.
Blanco, J., B. Bellón, L. Barthelemy, B. Camus, L. Jaffre, A. S. Masson, A. Masure & F. de O. Roque, F. L. Souza, & P. C. Renaud, 2022. A novel ecosystem (dis)service cascade model to navigate sustainability problems and its application in a changing agricultural landscape in Brazil. Sustainability Science 17: 105–119.
Borba, G. C., F. R. C. Costa, H. M. V. Espírito-Santo, R. P. Leitão, M. S. Dias & J. Zuanon, 2021. Temporal changes in rainfall affect taxonomic and functional composition of stream fish assemblages in central Amazonia. Freshwater Biology 66: 753–764.
Bowen, S. H., 1983. Detritivory in Neotropical fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9: 137–144.
Braga, T. M. P. & G. H. Rebelo, 2014. Conhecimento tradicional dos pescadores do baixo rio Juruá : aspectos relacionados aos hábitos alimentares dos peixes da região. Interciencia 39: 659–665.
Bueno, M. L., A. L. B. Magalhães, F. R. Andrade Neto, C. B. M. Alves & D. de M. Rosa, N. T. Junqueira, T. C. Pessali, P. S. Pompeu, & R. D. Zenni, 2021. Alien fish fauna of southeastern Brazil: species status, introduction pathways, distribution and impacts. Biological Invasions 23: 3021–3034.
Campos-Silva, J. V., J. E. Hawes, P. C. M. Andrade & C. A. Peres, 2018. Unintended multispecies co-benefits of an Amazonian community-based conservation programme. Nature Sustainability 1: 650–656.
Campos-Silva, J. V., C. A. Peres, J. H. F. Amaral, H. Sarmento, B. Forsberg & C. R. Fonseca, 2021. Fisheries management influences phytoplankton biomass of Amazonian floodplain lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology 58: 731–743.
Canonico, G. C., A. Arthington, J. K. McCrary & M. L. Thieme, 2005. The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation 15: 463–483.
Cantanhêde, G., N. S. Hahn, E. A. Gubiani & R. Fugi, 2008. Invasive molluscs in the diet of Pterodoras granulosus (Valenciennes, 1821) (Pisces, Doradidae) in the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 17: 47–53.
Carolsfeld, J., B. Harvey, C. Ross & A. Baer, 2003. Migratory fishes of South America: biology, fisheries and conservation status, World Fisheries Trust, The World Bank, Ottawa, ON:
Carvalho, D. R. & C. Bernardo Mascarenhas Alves, A. S. Flecker, J. P. Sparks, M. Zacharias Moreira, & P. Santos Pompeu, 2020. Using δ15N of periphyton and fish to evaluate spatial and seasonal variation of anthropogenic nitrogen inputs in a polluted Brazilian river basin. Ecological Indicators 115: 106372.
Carvalho, D. R., D. M. P. de Castro, M. Callisto, M. Z. Moreira & P. S. Pompeu, 2017. The trophic structure of fish communities from streams in the Brazilian Cerrado under different land uses: an approach using stable isotopes. Hydrobiologia 795: 199–217.
Carvalho, D. R., C. B. M. Alves, M. Z. Moreira & P. S. Pompeu, 2020. Trophic diversity and carbon sources supporting fish communities along a pollution gradient in a tropical river. Science of the Total Environment Elsevier 738: 139878.
Casatti, L., C. P. de Ferreira & F. R. Carvalho, 2009. Grass-dominated stream sites exhibit low fish species diversity and dominance by guppies: An assessment of two tropical pasture river basins. Hydrobiologia 632: 273–283.
Castro, V. B. & F. B. Barros, 2020. “Peixe é igual gente”: Etnoecologia da pesca entre os Vazanteiros-pescadores do médio rio Tocantins. Tessituras - Revista De Antropologia e Arqueologia 8: 3–38.
Castro, R. M. C. & C. N. M. Polaz, 2020. Small-sized fish: the largest and most threatened portion of the megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna. Biota Neotropica 20(1): e20180683.
Catarino, M. F., J. R. Kahn & C. E. C. Freitas, 2019. Stock assessment of Prochilodus nigricans (Actinopterygii: Characiformes: Prochilodontidae) using two distinct algorithms, in the context of a small-scale amazonian fishery. Acta Ichthyologica Et Piscatoria 49: 373–380.
Catelani, P. A., A. C. Petry, F. M. Pelicice & E. García-Berthou, 2021. When a freshwater invader meets the estuary: the peacock bass and fish assemblages in the São João River, Brazil. Biological Invasions 23: 167–179.
Cavali, J., M. L. R. de Souza, P. S. de Oliveira Kanarski, M. F. Coradini & J. V. D. Filho, 2022. Tanned leather of the paiche Arapaima gigas Schinz, 1822 (Arapaimidae) with extracts of vegetable origin to replace chromium salts. PLoS ONE 17: e0261781.
Chen, K., R. M. Hughes, J. G. Brito, C. G. Leal, R. P. Leitão, J. M. B. de Oliveira-Júnior, V. C. de Oliveira, K. Dias-Silva, S. F. B. Ferraz, J. Ferreira, N. Hamada, L. Juen, J. Nessimian, P. S. Pompeu & J. Zuanon, 2017. A multi-assemblage, multi-metric biological condition index for eastern Amazonia streams. Ecological Indicators 78: 48–61.
Chiaravalloti, R. M. & M. Dyble, 2018. Limited open access in socioecological systems: How do communities deal with environmental unpredictability? Conservation Letters 12: e12616.
Cooke, S. J., E. H. Allison, T. D. Beard, R. Arlinghaus, A. H. Arthington, D. M. Bartley, I. G. Cowx, C. Fuentevilla, N. J. Leonard, K. Lorenzen, A. J. Lynch, V. M. Nguyen, S. J. Youn, W. W. Taylor & R. L. Welcomme, 2016. On the sustainability of inland fisheries: Finding a future for the forgotten. Ambio 45: 753–764.
Correa, S. B., K. O. Winemiller, H. López-Fernández & M. Galetti, 2007. Evolutionary perspectives on seed consumption and dispersal by fishes. BioScience 57: 748–756.
Correa, S. B., J. K. Araujo, J. M. F. Penha, C. N. da Cunha, P. R. Stevenson & J. T. Anderson, 2015. Overfishing disrupts an ancient mutualism between frugivorous fishes and plants in Neotropical wetlands. Biological Conservation 191: 159–167.
Corrêa, E. C., F. de Oliveira Roque, R. M. Utz, J. de Sousa Correa, F. L. de Souza & A. P. Covich, 2018. Effects of macroconsumers on benthic communities: Rapid increases in dry-season accrual of calcium in a tropical karst stream. PLoS ONE 13: e0209102.
Costa-Neto, E. M., C. V. Dias & M. N. Melo, 2002. O conhecimento ictiológico tradicional dos pescadores da cidade de Barra, região do médio São Francisco, Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Acta Scientiarum - Biological Sciences 24: 561–572.
Costanza, R., R. de Groot, L. Braat, I. Kubiszewski, L. Fioramonti, P. Sutton, S. Farber & M. Grasso, 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services 28: 1–16.
Costa-Pereira, R. & M. Galetti, 2015. Frugivore downsizing and the collapse of seed dispersal by fish. Biological Conservation 191: 809–811.
Cruz-Garcia, G. S., M. Vanegas Cubillos, C. Torres-Vitolas, C. A. Harvey, C. M. Shackleton, K. Schreckenberg, S. Willcock, C. Navarrete-Frías & E. Sachet, 2019. He says, she says: Ecosystem services and gender among indigenous communities in the Colombian Amazon. Ecosystem Services 37: 100921.
Cubillos-Cuadrado, L. F., D. S. Munõz-Hernández & C. A. Vásquez-Londonõ, 2019. Fish consumption during menarche, menstruation, pregnancy and postpartum in Sikuani women from Meta, Colombia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 15: 1–12.
D’avilla, T., E. M. Costa-neto & M. F. G. Brito, 2021. Impacts on fisheries assessed by local ecological knowledge in a reservoir cascade in the lower São Francisco River, northeastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e200156.
Dagosta, F. C. P. & M. de Pinna, 2017. Biogeography of Amazonian fishes: Deconstructing river basins as biogeographic units. Neotropical Ichthyology 15: e170034.
Dávila-Camacho, C. A., I. Galaviz-Villa, F. Lango-Reynoso, M. D. R. Castañeda-Chávez, C. Quiroga-Brahms & J. Montoya-Mendoza, 2019. Cultivation of native fish in Mexico: cases of success. Reviews in Aquaculture 11: 816–829.
Delariva, R. L. & A. A. Agostinho, 2001. Relationship between morphology and diets of six Neotropical loricariids. Journal of Fish Biology 58: 832–847.
Dey, V. K., 2016. The Global Trade in Ornamental Fish. INFOFISH International 4: 52–55.
Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, J. R. Adhikari, S. Arico, A. Báldi, A. Bartuska, I. A. Baste, A. Bilgin, E. Brondizio, K. M. A. Chan, V. E. Figueroa, A. Duraiappah, M. Fischer, R. Hill, T. Koetz, P. Leadley, P. Lyver, G. M. Mace, B. Martin-Lopez, M. Okumura, D. Pacheco, U. Pascual, E. S. Pérez, B. Reyers, E. Roth, O. Saito, R. J. Scholes, N. Sharma, H. Tallis, R. Thaman, R. Watson, T. Yahara, Z. A. Hamid, C. Akosim, Y. Al-Hafedh, R. Allahverdiyev, E. Amankwah, T. S. Asah, Z. Asfaw, G. Bartus, A. L. Brooks, J. Caillaux, G. Dalle, D. Darnaedi, A. Driver, G. Erpul, P. Escobar-Eyzaguirre, P. Failler, A. M. M. Fouda, B. Fu, H. Gundimeda, S. Hashimoto, F. Homer, S. Lavorel, G. Lichtenstein, W. A. Mala, W. Mandivenyi, P. Matczak, C. Mbizvo, M. Mehrdadi, J. P. Metzger, J. B. Mikissa, H. Moller, H. A. Mooney, P. Mumby, H. Nagendra, C. Nesshover, A. A. Oteng-Yeboah, G. Pataki, M. Roué, J. Rubis, M. Schultz, P. Smith, R. Sumaila, K. Takeuchi, S. Thomas, M. Verma, Y. Yeo-Chang & D. Zlatanova, 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16.
Diogo, R., V. Abdala, N. Lonergan & B. A. Wood, 2008. From fish to modern humans - Comparative anatomy, homologies and evolution of the head and neck musculature. Journal of Anatomy 213: 391–424.
Doria, H. B., C. L. Voigt, S. X. de Campos & M. A. F. Randi, 2017. Metal pollution assessment in a Brazilian hydroelectric reservoir: Geophagus brasiliensis as a suitable bioindicator organism. Revista Ambiente e Agua 12: 575–590.
Doria, C. R. C., S. Athayde, E. E. Marques, M. A. L. Lima, J. Dutka-Gianelli, M. L. Ruffino, D. Kaplan, C. E. C. Freitas & V. N. Isaac, 2018. The invisibility of fisheries in the process of hydropower development across the Amazon. Ambio 47: 453–465.
Doria, C. R., C. E. Agudelo, A. Akama, B. Barros, M. Bonfim, L. Carneiro, S. R. Briglia-Ferreira, L. Nobre Carvalho, C. A. Bonilla-Castillo, P. Charvet, D. T. B. dosSantosCatâneo, H. P. da Silva, C. R. Garcia-Dávila, H. D. B. dos Anjos, F. Duponchelle, A. Encalada, I. Fernandes, A. C. Florentino, P. C. P. Guarido, T. L. de Oliveira Guedes, L. Jimenez-Segura, O. M. Lasso-Alcalá, M. R. Macean, E. E. Marques, R. N. G. Mendes-Júnior, G. Miranda-Chumacero, J. L. S. Nunes, T. V. T. Occhi, L. S. Pereira, W. Castro-Pulido, L. Soares, R. G. C. Sousa, G. Torrente-Vilara, P. A. Van Damme, J. Zuanon & J. R. S. Vitule, 2021. The silent threat of non-native fish in the Amazon: ANNF database and review. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 646702.
Duponchelle, F., V. J. Isaac & C. Rodrigues Da Costa Doria, P. A. Van Damme, G. A. Herrera-R, E. P. Anderson, R. E. A. Cruz, M. Hauser, T. W. Hermann, E. Agudelo, C. Bonilla-Castillo, R. Barthem, C. E. C. Freitas, C. García-Dávila, A. García-Vasquez, J. F. Renno, & L. Castello, 2021. Conservation of migratory fishes in the Amazon basin. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 31: 1087–1105.
Elías, D. J., C. E. Fuentes-Montejo, Y. Quintana & C. A. Barrientos, 2022. Non-native freshwater fishes in Guatemala, northern Central America: introduction sources, distribution, history, and conservation consequences. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 17(1): 59–85.
El-Sabaawi, R. W., T. C. Frauendorf, P. S. Marques, R. A. MacKenzie, L. R. Manna, R. Mazzoni, D. A. T. Phillip, M. L. Warbanski & E. Zandonà, 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem risks arising from using guppies to control mosquitoes. Biology Letters 12: 20160590.
Evers, H. G., J. K. Pinnegar & M. I. Taylor, 2019. Where are they all from? – sources and sustainability in the ornamental freshwater fish trade. Journal of Fish Biology 94: 909–916.
FAO, 2018. Review of the state of the world fishery resources: Inland fisheries, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular, Rome:
FAO, 2015. Colombia. Pesca en cifras/2014. FAO, Minagricultura, Bogotá DC
Fitzgerald, D. B., M. Tobler & K. O. Winemiller, 2016. From richer to poorer: successful invasion by freshwater fishes depends on species richness of donor and recipient basins. Global Change Biology 22: 2440–2450.
Flecker, A. S., 1992. Fish trophic guilds and the structure of a tropical stream: weak direct vs. strong indirect effects. Ecology 73: 927–940.
Flecker, A. S., 1996. Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77: 1845–1854.
Flecker, A. S. & B. W. Taylor, 2004. Tropical fishes as biological bulldozers : density effects on resource heterogeneity and species diversity. Ecology 85: 2267–2278.
Flecker, A. S., P. B. McIntyre, J. W. Moore, J. T. Anderson, B. W. Taylor & R. O. Hall Jr., 2010. Migratory fishes as material and process subsidies in riverine ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium 73: 559–592.
Fonseca, T., B. A. Costa-Pierce & W. C. Valenti, 2017. Lambari aquaculture as a means for the sustainable development of rural communities in Brazil. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture 25: 316–330.
Franco, A. C. S., A. C. Petry, M. R. Tavares, T. de Fátima Ramos & Guimarães, & L. N. dos Santos, 2022. Global distribution of the South American peacock basses Cichla spp. follows human interference. Fish and Fisheries 23: 407–421.
Freire, K. M. F., M. L. Machado & D. Crepaldi, 2012. Overview of inland recreational fisheries in Brazil. Fisheries 37: 484–494.
Freire, K. M. F., R. A. Tubino, C. Monteiro-Neto, M. F. Andrade-Tubino, C. G. Belruss, A. R. G. Tomás, S. L. S. Tutui, P. M. G. Castro, L. S. Maruyama, A. C. Catella, D. V. Crepaldi, C. R. A. Daniel, M. L. Machado, J. T. Mendonça, P. S. Moro, F. S. Motta, M. Ramires, M. H. C. Silva & J. P. Vieira, 2016. Brazilian recreational fisheries: current status, challenges and future direction. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23: 276–290.
Fricke R., W. N. Eschmeyer, & R. Van der Laan, 2021. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. California Academy of Science, San Francisco. Available from: https://www.calacademy.org/scientists/projects/eschmeyers-catalog-of-fishes
Funge-Smith, S. & A. Bennett, 2019. A fresh look at inland fisheries and their role in food security and livelihoods. Fish and Fisheries 20: 1176–1195.
Garcia, D. A. Z., J. R. Britton, A. P. Vidotto-Magnoni & M. L. Orsi, 2018. Introductions of non-native fishes into a heavily modified river: rates, patterns and management issues in the Paranapanema River (Upper Paraná ecoregion, Brazil). Biological Invasions 20: 1229–1241.
Garnelo, L., 2007. Cosmology, environment, and health: Baniwa food myths and rituals. História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos 14: 191–212.
Garrone-Neto, D., E. A. Sanches & F. A. L. de M. Daros, C. M. R. Imanobu, & P. S. Moro, 2018. Using the same fish with different rules: A science-based approach for improving management of recreational fisheries in a biodiversity hotspot of the Western South Atlantic. Fisheries Management and Ecology 25: 253–260.
Godinho, H. P., & A. L. Godinho, 2003. Águas, peixes e pescadores do São Francisco das Minas Gerais. Editora PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte
Gonçalves, D. C. M. & J. R. de V. Gama, F. de A. Oliveira, R. C. de O. Junior, G. C. Araújo, & L. S. de Almeida, 2012. Aspectos mercadológicos dos produtos não madeireiros na economia de Santarém-Pará, Brasil. Floresta e Ambiente 19: 9–16.
Goulding, M., 1980. The fishes and the forest: explorations in Amazonian natural history, University of California Press, Berkeley:
Gross, D. R., 1975. Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon Basin. American Anthropologist 77(3): 526–549.
Guimarães, R. G. & A. A. Z. Zavala, 2009. A atividade turistica da região de Nobres/MT como instrumento de desenvolvimento econômico sustentável. Revista De Estudos Sociais 2: 40–58.
Guimarães, T. F. R., A. C. Petry, F. G. Becker, & S. M. Hartz, 2022. Relations between land use and fish species richness in Neotropical coastal lagoons. Hydrobiologia
Gutierrez, B. F. P. & C. A. R. Agudelo, 2020. Fish as bioindicators: coal and mercury pollution in Colombia’s ecosystems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27: 27541–27562.
Hallwass, G. & R. A. M. Silvano, 2016. Patterns of selectiveness in the Amazonian freshwater fisheries: implications for management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(9): 1537–1559.
Hallwass, G., P. F. Lopes, A. A. Juras & R. A. M. Silvano, 2013. Fishers’ knowledge identifies environmental changes and fish abundance trends in impounded tropical rivers. Ecological Applications 23: 392–407.
Hallwass, G., A. Schiavetti & R. A. M. Silvano, 2020. Fishers’ knowledge indicates temporal changes in composition and abundance of fishing resources in Amazon protected areas. Animal Conservation 23: 36–47.
Harp, W., 1994. Ecology and cosmology: rain forest exploitation among the Emberá-Chocó. Nature & Resources 30: 23–27.
Helfman, G. S., 2007. Fish conservation: a guide to understanding and restoring global aquatic biodiversity and fishery resources, Island Press, Washington, DC:
Henriques, M. B., K. F. O. Rezende, L. Castilho-Barros & E. Barbieri, 2021. Sublethal effects of propiconazole on the metabolism of lambari Deuterodon iguape (Eigenmann 1907), a native species from Brazil. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 47: 1165–1177.
Hilsdorf, A. W. S. & E. M. Halleman, 2017. Genetic resources of Neotropical fishes, Springer, Cham:
Hoeinghaus, D. J., A. A. Agostinho, L. C. Gomes, F. M. Pelicice, E. K. Okada, J. D. Latini, E. A. L. Kashiwaqui & K. O. Winemiller, 2009. Effects of river impoundment on ecosystem services of large tropical rivers: Embodied energy and market value of artisanal fisheries. Conservation Biology 23: 1222–1231.
Holley, M. H., M. J. Maceina, M. Thomé-Souza & B. R. Forsberg, 2008. Analysis of the trophy sport fishery for the speckled peacock bass in the Rio Negro River, Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecology 15: 93–98.
Holmlund, C. M. & M. Hammer, 1999. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics 29: 253–268.
Horn, M. H., S. B. Correa, P. Parolin, B. J. A. Pollux, J. T. Anderson, C. Lucas, P. Widmann, A. Tjiu, M. Galetti & M. Goulding, 2011. Seed dispersal by fishes in tropical and temperate fresh waters: The growing evidence. Acta Oecologica 37: 561–577.
Ibarra-Trujillo, E. J. & C. A. García-Alzate, 2017. Ecología trófica y reproductiva de Hemibrycon sierraensis (Characiformes: Characidae), pez endémico del río Gaira, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Revista De Biología Tropical 65: 1033–1045.
IPBES, 2019. The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany:
Isaac, A., A. Fernandes, M. Ganassin & N. Hahn, 2014. Three invasive species occurring in the diets of fishes in a Neotropical floodplain. Brazilian Journal of Biology 74: s16–s22.
Junk, W. J., 2007. Freshwater fishes of South America: Their biodiversity, fisheries, and habitats - A synthesis. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 10: 228–242.
Kern, D. C., H. P. Lima, J. A. da Costa, H. V. de Lima, A. Browne Ribeiro, B. M. Moraes & N. Kämpf, 2017. Terras pretas: Approaches to formation processes in a new paradigm. Geoarchaeology 32: 694–706.
Knight, T. M., M. W. McCoy, J. M. Chase, K. A. McCoy & R. D. Holt, 2005. Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437: 880–883.
Kowalko, J., 2020. Utilizing the blind cavefish Astyanax mexicanus to understand the genetic basis of behavioral evolution. Journal of Experimental Biology 223: jeb208835.
Kwak, T. J., A. C. Engman, J. R. Fischer, & C. G. Lilyestrom. 2016. Drivers of Caribbean freshwater ecosystems and fisheries. In: Taylor, W. W., D. M. Bartley, C. I. Goddard, N. J. Leonard, & R. Welcomme (eds), Freshwater, fish and the future: Proceedings of the global cross-sectoral conference. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; Michigan State University, East Lansing; and American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland: 219–232.
La Notte, A., D. D’Amato, H. Mäkien & N. D. Crossman, 2017. Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecological Indicators 74: 392–402.
Ladislau, D. S., M. W. S. Ribeiro, P. D. S. Castro, P. H. R. Aride, A. J. V. Paiva, M. F. Polese, A. B. Souza, L. A. Bassul, H. D. Lavander & A. T. Oliveira, 2020. Ornamental fishing in the region of Barcelos, Amazonas: Socioeconomic description and scenario of activity in the view of “piabeiros.” Brazilian Journal of Biology 80: 544–556.
Lasso, C. A., R. S. Rosa, M. A. Morales-Betancourt, D. Garrone-Neto, & M. Carvalho. 2016. Rayas de agua dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte II: Colombia, Brasil, Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Argentina. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá.
Leal, L. B., D. J. Hoeinghaus, Z. G. Compson, A. A. Agostinho, R. Fernandes & F. M. Pelicice, 2021. Changes in ecosystem functions generated by fish populations after the introduction of a non-native predator (Cichla kelberi (Perciformes: Cichlidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e210041.
Lima, A. C., J. Assis, D. Sayanda, J. Sabino & R. F. Oliveira, 2014. Impact of ecotourism on the fish fauna of Bonito region (Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil): Ecological, behavioural and physiological measures. Neotropical Ichthyology 12: 133–143.
Lima Junior, D. P., A. L. B. Magalhães, F. M. Pelicice, J. R. S. Vitule, V. M. Azevedo-Santos, M. L. Orsi, D. Simberloff & A. A. Agostinho, 2018. Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ambio 47: 427–440.
Lopes, G. C. & S., M. F. Catarino, Á. C. Lima, & C. E. de C. Freitas, 2016. Small-scale fisheries in the Amazon basin: general patterns and diversity of fish landings in five sub-basins. Boletim Do Instituto De Pesca 42: 889–900.
Lopes, T. M., D. Bailly, B. A. Almeida, N. C. L. Santos, B. C. G. Gimenez, G. O. Landgraf, P. C. L. Sales, M. S. Lima-Ribeiro, F. A. S. Cassemiro, T. F. Rangel, J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes, 2017. Two sides of a coin: Effects of climate change on the native and non-native distribution of Colossoma macropomum in South America. PLoS ONE 12: e0179684.
Lopes, J. M., P. S. Pompeu, C. B. M. Alves, A. Peressin, I. G. Prado, F. M. Suzuki, S. Facchin, & E. Kalapothakis, 2019. The critical importance of an undammed river segment to the reproductive cycle of a migratory Neotropical fish. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 28: 302–316.
Lubich, C., C. Campos, C. Freitas & F. Siqueira-Souza, 2021. Effects of fishing on the population of speckled pavón Cichla temensis in the Middle Negro River (Amazonas State, Brazil): A decrease in the size of the trophy fish? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 150(6): 667–678.
Lynch, A. J., S. J. Cooke, A. M. Deines, S. D. Bower, D. B. Bunnell, I. G. Cowx, V. M. Nguyen, J. Nohner, K. Phouthavong, B. Riley, M. W. Rogers, W. W. Taylor, W. Woelmer, S. J. Youn & T. D. Beard, 2016. The social, economic, and environmental importance of inland fish and fisheries. Environmental Reviews 24: 115–121.
Magalhães, K. W., C. Lima, A. A. Piran-Soares, E. E. Marques, C. A. Hiruma-Lima & M. Lopes-Ferreira, 2006. Biological and biochemical properties of the Brazilian Potamotrygon stingrays: Potamotrygon cf. scobina and Potamotrygon gr. orbignyi. Toxicon 47: 575–583.
Magalhães, A. L. B., F. M. Pelicice & D. P. Lima-Junior, 2018. Riscos ambientais e socioeconômicos do Projeto de Lei que visa a proteção de espécies invasoras (tucunaré azul e tucunaré amarelo) no Estado do Paraná, Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia, Londrina, PR:
Maggioni, T., A. C. Hued, M. V. Monferrán, R. I. Bonansea, L. N. Galanti & M. V. Amé, 2012. Bioindicators and biomarkers of environmental pollution in the middle-lower basin of the Suquía River (Córdoba, Argentina). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 63: 337–353.
Mazzeo, N., C. Iglesias, F. Teixeira-de Mello, A. Borthagaray, C. Fosalba, R. Ballabio, D. Larrea, J. Vilches, S. García, J. P. Pacheco & E. Jeppesen, 2010. Trophic cascade effects of Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) in subtropical lakes food webs: A mesocosm approach. Hydrobiologia 644: 325–335.
McIntyre, P. B., L. E. Jones, A. S. Flecker & M. J. Vanni, 2007. Fish extinctions alter nutrient recycling in tropical freshwaters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 4461–4466.
McIntyre, P. B., A. S. Flecker, M. J. Vanni, J. M. Hood, B. W. Taylor & S. A. Thomas, 2008. Fish distributions and nutrient cycling in streams: Can fish create biogeochemical hotspots? Ecology 89: 2335–2346.
McIntyre, P. B., C. A. R. Liermann & C. Revenga. 2016. Linking freshwater fishery management to global food security and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(45): 12880–12885.
MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington, DC:
Monteiro, D. A., E. W. Taylor, M. R. Sartori, A. L. Cruz, F. T. Rantin & C. A. C. Leite, 2018. Cardiorespiratory interactions previously identified as mammalian are present in the primitive lungfish. Science Advances 4: 1–12.
Moreira, D. F. & M. R. Colombier, 2019. Mi casa pequeña, mi corazón grande. Política territorial y cosmológica del pueblo Kukama. Mundo Amazónico 10: 157–184.
Mormul, R. P., S. M. Thomaz, A. A. Agostinho, C. C. Bonecker & N. Mazzeo, 2012. Migratory benthic fishes may induce regime shifts in a tropical floodplain pond. Freshwater Biology 57: 1592–1602.
Motta, F. S., J. T. Mendonça & P. S. Moro, 2016. Collaborative assessment of recreational fishing in a subtropical estuarine system: a case study with fishing guides from south-eastern Brazil. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23: 291–302.
Moura, F. B. P., & J. G. W. Marques, 2007. Conhecimento de pescadores tradicionais sobre a dinâmica espaço-temporal de recursos naturais na Chapada Diamantina, Bahia. Biota Neotropica 7: 119–126.
Muniz, C. M., N. C. L. dos Santos, M. T. Baumgartner, A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes, 2020. Chronological age and reservoir characteristics as predictors of trait composition in Neotropical reservoir fish assemblages. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 29: 241–251.
Myers, R. A. & B. Worm, 2003. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423: 280–283.
Nagl, P., G. Hallwass, L. H. Tomazoni-Silva, P. P. Nitschke, A. R. P. Rowedder, A. T. Romero-Martinez & R. A. M. Silvano, 2021. Protected areas and frugivorous fish in tropical rivers: small-scale fisheries, conservation and ecosystem services. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 31(10): 2752–2771.
Nietschmann, B., 1972. Hunting and fishing focus among the Miskito Indians, eastern Nicaragua. Human Ecology 1(1): 41–67.
Novaes, J. L. C. & E. D. Carvalho, 2013. Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil). Neotropical Ichthyology 11(2): 403–412.
Novák, J., J. Hofmann, D. Hohl, A. L. B. Magalhães & J. Patoka, 2022. Enigmatic armoured catfishes (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae and Loricariidae) in ornamental aquaculture: A new insight into Neotropical fish diversity. Aquaculture 547: 737460.
Obregón, C., A. R. Lyndon, J. Barker, H. Christiansen, B. J. Godley, S. Kurland, J. J. Piccolo, R. Potts, R. Short, A. Tebb & S. Mariani, 2018. Valuing and understanding fish populations in the Anthropocene: key questions to address. Journal of Fish Biology 92: 828–845.
Okada, E. K., A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes, 2005. Spatial and temporal gradients in artisanal fisheries of a large Neotropical reservoir, the Itaipu Reservoir, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 714–724.
Okeyo, D. O., 1989. Herbivory in freshwater fishes - a review. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidigeh 41: 79–87.
Olden, J. D., J. R. S. Vitule, J. Cucherousset & M. J. Kennard, 2020. There’s more to fish than just food: exploring the diverse ways that fish contribute to human society. Fisheries 45(9): 453–464.
Oliveira, M. S., 2017. Através do universo: notas sobre as constelações na cosmologia Tukano. Revista Anthropológicas 28: 134–168.
Oliveira, R. C. & M. da C. F. Santos, G. Bernardino, T. Hrbek, & I. P. Farias, 2018. From river to farm: an evaluation of genetic diversity in wild and aquaculture stocks of Brycon amazonicus (Spix & Agassiz, 1829), Characidae, Bryconinae. Hydrobiologia 805: 75–88.
Oliveira, C. R. C., R. Fugi, K. P. Brancalhão & A. A. Agostinho, 2010. Fish as potential controllers of invasive mollusks in a neotropical reservoir. Natureza a Conservação 8: 140–144.
Oliveira, A. G., H. I. Suzuki, L. C. Gomes & A. A. Agostinho, 2015. Interspecific variation in migratory fish recruitment in the Upper Paraná River: Effects of the duration and timing of floods. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98: 1327–1337.
Padilla, D., L. Beleño & R. Cuello, 2012. Evaluación de la extracción del aceite de la Triportheus magdalenae y análisis del perfil lipídico del aceite crudo. Revista Iberoamercicana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo 3(5): 1–19.
Pelicice, F. M., 2019. Weak democracies, failed policies, and the demise of ecosystems in poor and developing nations. Tropical Conservation Science 12: 1–9.
Pelicice, F. M. & A. A. Agostinho, 2005. Perspectives on ornamental fisheries in the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Fisheries Research 72: 109–119.
Pelicice, F. M. & A. A. Agostinho, 2009. Fish fauna destruction after the introduction of a non-native predator (Cichla kelberi) in a Neotropical reservoir. Biological Invasions 11: 1789–1801.
Pelicice, F. M., V. M. Azevedo-Santos, J. R. S. Vitule, M. L. Orsi, D. P. Lima Junior, A. L. B. Magalhães, P. S. Pompeu, M. Petrere & A. A. Agostinho, 2017. Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies. Fish and Fisheries 18: 1119–1133.
Pelicice, F. M., V. M. Azevedo-Santos, A. L. H. Esguícero, A. A. Agostinho & M. S. Arcifa, 2018. Fish diversity in the cascade of reservoirs along the Paranapanema River, southeast Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 16: e170150.
Pelicice, F. M., A. Bialetzki, P. Camelier, F. R. Carvalho, E. García-Berthou, P. S. Pompeu, F. T. de Mello & C. S. Pavanelli, 2021. Human impacts and the loss of Neotropical freshwater fish diversity. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e210134.
Pelster, B., A. L. Val & R. Dallinger, 2021. Recent advances in biology and physiology of tropical freshwater fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part a: Ecological and Integrative Physiology 335: 721–722.
Pereyra, P. E. R., G. Hallwass, M. Poesch & R. A. M. Silvano, 2021. ‘Taking Fishers’ knowledge to the lab’: an interdisciplinary approach to understand fish trophic relationships in the Brazilian Amazon. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 723026.
Petrere, M., A. A. Agostinho, E. K. Okada & H. F. Júlio, 2002. Review of the fisheries in the Brazilian portion of the Paraná/Pantanal Basin. In Cowx, I. G. (ed), Management and ecology of lake and reservoir fisheries Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Osnet Mead, Oxford: 123–143.
Petrere, M., R. B. Barthem, E. A. Córdoba & B. C. Gómez, 2004. Review of the large catfish fisheries in the upper Amazon and the stock depletion of piraíba (Brachyplatystoma filamentosum Lichtenstein). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14: 403–414.
Pinto, G. L., J. da Silva Castro & A. L. Val, 2021. Copper and cadmium impair sperm performance, fertilization and hatching of oocytes from Amazonian fish Colossoma macropomum. Chemosphere 266: 128957.
Prudente, B. S., P. S. Pompeu & L. Montag, 2018. Using multimetric indices to assess the effect of reduced impact logging on ecological integrity of Amazonian streams. Ecological Indicators 91: 315–323.
Rabuffetti, A. P., L. A. Espínola, E. Abrial, M. L. Amsler, M. C. Blettler, M. F. Eurich & E. G. Eberle, 2020. Commercial fisheries in a mega unregulated floodplain river: Assessment of the most favourable hydrological conditions for its preservation. Journal of Fish Biology 96: 59–73.
Reis, R. E., J. S. Albert, F. Di Dario, M. M. Mincarone, P. Petry & L. A. Rocha, 2016. Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. Journal of Fish Biology 89: 12–47.
Reys, P., J. Sabino & M. Galetti, 2009. Frugivory by the fish Brycon hilarii (Characidae) in western Brazil. Acta Oecologica 35: 136–141.
Röpke, C., T. H. S. Pires, N. Zuchi, J. Zuanon & S. Amadio, 2022. Effects of climate-driven hydrological changes in the reproduction of Amazonian floodplain fishes. Journal of Applied Ecology 59: 1134–1145.
Roux, O. & V. Robert, 2019. Larval predation in malaria vectors and its potential implication in malaria transmission: An overlooked ecosystem service? Parasites and Vectors 12: 217.
Sabaj Perez, M., 2015. Where the Xingu bends and will soon break. American Scientist 103: 395–403.
Sanseverino, A. M., D. Bastviken, I. Sundh, J. Pickova & A. Enrich-Prast, 2012. Methane carbon supports aquatic food webs to the fish level. PLoS ONE 7: e42723.
Santos, C. A. B. & R. R. N. Alves, 2016. Ethnoichthyology of the Indigenous Truká People, Northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 12: 1.
Santos, A. F. G. N., E. García-Berthou, C. Hayashi & L. N. Santos, 2018a. Water turbidity increases biotic resistance of native Neotropical piscivores to alien fish. Hydrobiologia 817: 293–305.
Santos, D. A., D. J. Hoeinghaus & L. C. Gomes, 2018b. Spatial scales and the invasion paradox: a test using fish assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain. Hydrobiologia 817: 121–131.
Santos, R. E., R. M. Pinto-Coelho, R. Fonseca, N. R. Simões & F. B. Zanchi, 2018c. The decline of fisheries on the Madeira River, Brazil: The high cost of the hydroelectric dams in the Amazon Basin. Fisheries Management and Ecology 25: 380–391.
Santos, V. L. M., P. A. Catelani, A. C. Petry & É. M. P. Caramaschi, 2021. Hydrological alterations enhance fish invasions: lessons from a Neotropical coastal river. Hydrobiologia 848: 2383–2397.
Scarabotti, P. A., L. O. Lucifora, L. A. Espínola, A. P. Rabuffetti, J. Liotta, J. E. Mantinian, J. P. Roux, N. Silva, L. Balboni, F. Vargas, L. D. Demonte & S. Sánchez, 2021. Long-term trends of fishery landings and target fish populations in the lower La Plata basin. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e210013.
Scheffer, M. & S. R. Carpenter, 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(12): 648–656.
Schindler, D. E., S. R. Carpenter, J. J. Cole, J. F. Kitchell, M. L. Pace, D. E. Schindler, S. R. Carpenter, J. J. Cole, J. F. Kitchell & M. L. Pace, 1997. Influence of food web structure on carbon exchange between lakes and the atmosphere. Science 277: 248–251.
Schulz, U. H. & H. Martins-Junior, 2001. Astyanax fasciatus as bioindicator of water pollution of Rio dos Sinos, RS, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 61: 615–622.
Siikamäki, J. V., P. Vail, R. Epanchin-Niell, & F. Santigo-Avila. 2015. Mapping the value of ecosystem services in Latin America and the Caribbean. Resources 188. Retrieved from https://www.resources.org/archives/mapping-the-value-of-ecosystem-services-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/
Silvano, R. A. M. & A. Begossi, 2016. From Ethnobiology to Ecotoxicology: fishers’ knowledge on trophic levels as indicator of bioaccumulation in tropical marine and freshwater fishes. Ecosystems 19(7): 1310–1324.
Silvano, R. A. M., A. L. Silva, M. Ceroni & A. Begossi, 2008. Contributions of Ethnobiology to the conservation of tropical rivers and streams. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18(3): 241–260.
Small, G. E., C. M. Pringle, M. Pyron & J. H. Duff, 2011. Role of the fish Astyanax aeneus (Characidae) as a keystone nutrient recycler in low-nutrient neotropical streams. Ecology 92: 386–397.
Sousa, L. M., O. Lucanus, J. P. Arroyo-Mora & M. Kalacska, 2021. Conservation and trade of the endangered Hypancistrus zebra (Siluriformes, Loricariidae), one of the most trafficked Brazilian fish. Global Ecology and Conservation 27: e01570.
Souza-Stevaux, M. C., R. R. B. Negrelle & V. Citadini-Zanette, 1994. Seed dispersal by the fish Pterodoras granulosus in the Paraná River basin, Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 621–626.
TAP Barbosa LFA Montag, 2017. The role of Lithodoras dorsalis Doradidae Siluriformes as seed disperser in Eastern Amazon. Neotropical Ichthyology 15: e160061.
Taylor, B. W., A. S. Flecker & R. O. Hall Jr., 2006. Loss of a harvested fish species disrupts carbon flow in a diverse tropical river. Science 313: 333–336.
Thé, A. P. G., E. F. Madi, & N. Nordi, 2003. Conhecimento local, regras informais e uso do peixe na pesca do alto- médio São Francisco. In: Godinho, H. P. & A. L. Godinho (eds), Águas, peixes e pescadores do São Francisco das Minas Gerais. PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte: 389–406.
Tonella, L. H., R. M. Dias, O. B. Vitorino Junior, R. Fugi & A. A. Agostinho, 2019. Conservation status and bio-ecology of Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae), an endemic fish species from the Paraná River basin (Brazil) threatened with extinction. Neotropical Ichthyology 17: e190030.
Tonella, L. H., et al., 2022. Neotropical Freshwater Fishes: A dataset of occurrence and abundance of freshwater fishes in the Neotropics. Ecology 1: e3713.
Tonini, L., L. M. Sarmento-Soares, M. M. C. Roldi & M. M. Lopes, 2016. A coleção didática de peixes no Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA), Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo, Brasil: subsídios para o Ensino de Zoologia. Boletim Do Museu De Biologia Mello Leitão 38: 347–362.
Torati, L. S., J. B. Taggart, E. S. Varela, J. Araripe, S. Wehner & H. Migaud, 2019. Genetic diversity and structure in Arapaima gigas populations from Amazon and Araguaia-Tocantins river basins. BMC Genetics 20: 13.
Toussaint, A., N. Charpin, S. Brosse & S. Villéger, 2016. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Scientific Reports Nature Publishing Group 6: 22125.
Tranchida, M. C., S. A. Pelizza, V. Bisaro, C. Beltrán, J. J. García & M. V. Micieli, 2010. Use of the Neotropical fish Cnesterodon decemmaculatus for long-term control of Culex pipiens L. in Argentina. Biological Control 53: 183–187.
Tregidgo, D. J., J. Barlow, P. S. Pompeu, M. A. Rocha & L. Parry. 2017. Rainforest metropolis casts 1000-km defaunation shadow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(32): 8655–8659.
Tregidgo, D., J. Barlow, P. S. Pompeu & L. Parry, 2020. Tough fishing and severe seasonal food insecurity in Amazonian flooded forests. People and Nature 2: 468–482.
Tregidgo, D., L. Parry, J. Barlow & P. S. Pompeu, 2021. Urban market amplifies strong species selectivity in Amazonian artisanal fisheries. Neotropical Ichthyology 19: e200097.
Tribuzy-Neto, I. D. A., H. Beltrão, Z. S. Benzaken & K. C. Yamamoto, 2020. Analysis of the ornamental fish exports from the Amazon State. Brazil. Boletim Do Instituto De Pesca 46: e554.
Val, A. L. & A. M. de Oliveira, 2021. Colossoma macropomum - A tropical fish model for biology and aquaculture. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part a: Ecological and Integrative Physiology 335: 761–770.
Valenti, W. C., H. P. Barros, P. Moraes-Valenti, G. W. Bueno & R. O. Cavalli, 2021. Aquaculture in Brazil: past, present and future. Aquaculture Reports 19: 100611.
Van Damme, P. A., L. Córdova-Clavijo, C. Baigún, M. Hauser, C. R. da Costa Doria & F. Duponchelle, 2019. Upstream dam impacts on gilded catfish Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) in the Bolivian amazon. Neotropical Ichthyology 17: e190118.
Vanni, M. J., A. S. Flecker, J. M. Hood & J. L. Headworth, 2002. Stoichiometry of nutrient recycling by vertebrates in a tropical stream: Linking species identity and ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters 5: 285–293.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continnum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37: 130–137.
Viana, A. & F. Lucena Frédou, 2014. Ichthyofauna as bioindicator of environmental quality in an industrial district in the amazon estuary, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 74: 315–324.
Vitule, J. R. S., F. Skóra & V. Abilhoa, 2012. Homogenization of freshwater fish faunas after the elimination of a natural barrier by a dam in Neotropics. Diversity and Distributions 18: 111–120.
Vitule, J. R. S., A. A. Agostinho, V. M. Azevedo-Santos, V. S. Daga, W. R. T. Darwall, D. B. Fitzgerald, F. A. Frehse, D. J. Hoeinghaus, D. P. Lima-Junior, A. L. B. Magalhães, M. L. Orsi, A. A. Padial, F. M. Pelicice, M. Petrere, P. S. Pompeu & K. O. Winemiller, 2017. We need better understanding about functional diversity and vulnerability of tropical freshwater fishes. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 757–762.
Wasko, A. P., C. Martins, C. Oliveira & F. Forest, 2004. Genetic conservation of Brazilian fishes - Present state and perspectives. Annual Review of Biomedical Sciences 6: 79–90.
Wilson, E. O., 1986. Biophilia, Harvard University Press, Harvard:
Winemiller, K. O., J. V. Montoya, D. L. Roelke, C. A. Layman & J. B. Cotner, 2006. Seasonally varying impact of detritivorous fishes on the benthic ecology of a tropical floodplain river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 250–262.
WWF, 2021. The world’s forgotten fishes: valuing freshwater fish is critical for people and nature, Publishing office, World Wildlife Fund International. Gland Switzerland:
Acknowledgements
The authors thank their respective institutions for providing infrastructure and support. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) provided research funds to F. M. Pelicice (#312256/2020-5), L. C. Gomes (#304403/2021-0), C. S. Pavanelli (# 308777/2019-0), P. S. Pompeu (#303548/2017-7), L. M. Sousa (#311148/2020-4), J. Zuanon (# 313183/2014-7), and R. E. Reis (#306455/2014-5). FAP-DF provided research funds to E. Bessa (#2452018).
Funding
This work received no specific funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FMP had the idea for the article, and all authors performed the literature search and data analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FMP and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Guest editors: Verónica Ferreira, Luis Mauricio Bini, Katya E. Kovalenko, Andre A. Padial, Judit Padisák & María de los Ángeles González Sagrario / Aquatic Ecosystem Services
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pelicice, F.M., Agostinho, A.A., Azevedo-Santos, V.M. et al. Ecosystem services generated by Neotropical freshwater fishes. Hydrobiologia 850, 2903–2926 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04986-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04986-7