Abstract
Novel fertilization strategies, such as the use of biochar-based fertilizers (BBFs) and the co-application of biochar with mineral fertilizers, have shown promising results for mitigating nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and reducing N losses in agroecosystems. Two greenhouse experiments were performed with radish to evaluate: (1) the mitigation of yield-scaled N2O emissions using BBFs, produced at either 400 or 800 °C and enriched with urea, compared to the co-application of raw biochars with urea; and (2) the N2O mitigation potential of low rates of raw biochars, equivalent to those used with BBFs fertilization, co-applied with low and high N rates (90 and 180 kg N ha−1). BBF produced at 800 °C reduced yield-scaled N2O emissions by 32% as compared to the urea treatment, and by 60%, as compared to the combination of raw biochar with urea. This reduction was attributed to the slow rate of N release in BBF. On the contrary, the co-application of low rates of biochar with urea increased yield-scaled N2O emissions as compared to the fertilization with urea alone. Low rates of biochar (1.4–3.1 t ha−1) reduced yield-scaled N2O emissions only with a high rate of N fertilization. High-pyrolysis-temperature biochar, co-applied with synthetic fertilizer, or used to produce BBFs, demonstrated lower yield-scaled N2O emissions than biochar produced at a lower pyrolysis temperature. This study showed that BBFs are a promising fertilization strategy as compared to the co-application of biochar with synthetic fertilizers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Fertilized soils represent the highest source of direct and indirect nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in agriculture (FAO 2020). This greenhouse gas (GHG) contributes to both increasing global temperatures and depleting the ozone layer (Myrold 2021). There is a high urgency to mitigate N2O emissions from agricultural lands (Tian et al. 2020). However, in order to guarantee food security, mitigation practices need to address potential trade-offs with crop yields (Grados et al. 2022). Thus, in order to evaluate the mitigation potential of a given agricultural practice, the determination of yield-scaled N2O emissions or N2O-intensity is a better option than area-scaled N2O emissions, as the former contemplates N2O emissions per crop unit or N taken up by crops (Van Groenigen et al. 2010).
Recently, Grados et al. (2022) evaluated the efficiency of the most widely adopted N2O mitigation practices. They identified some technology-driven solutions, such as the application of urease/nitrification inhibitors, the adoption of drip irrigation, and the use of biochar as the most promising strategies to reduce emissions without compromising crop production. The co-application of biochar with fertilizers is a well-documented strategy to mitigate GHG emissions, in particular N2O, and to increase C sequestration in soil (Joseph et al. 2021). N2O mitigation with biochar is associated with its ability to retain N and promote the last step of denitrification, thereby decreasing the N2O/(N2O + N2) ratio (Cayuela et al. 2013; Van Zwieten et al. 2014). In addition, the characteristics of the biochar influence its mitigation potential. Thus, the higher the aromaticity of biochar (due to high pyrolysis temperatures), the higher the reduction in N2O emissions (Cayuela et al. 2015).
In order to guarantee the sustainability of biochar as a GHG mitigation strategy, several aspects need to be considered. First, it is important to avoid large scale biochar production from both biomass crops and forest wood, as this could lead to land use change and deforestation in some areas (IPCC 2023). In contrast, biochar produced from agroforestry residues is an environmentally and economically feasible practice that can contribute to a circular economy (Robb et al. 2020; Azzi et al. 2021). A second aspect to consider is biochar application rate. The cost of producing and applying biochar into soil may be economically unviable if the biochar application rate is high (Baveye 2023).
On the other hand, the biochar application rate is known to directly correlate with its N2O mitigation potential (Cayuela et al. 2014; Rittl et al. 2021), with rates lower than 10 t ha−1 not having a significant effect on N2O emissions (Borchard et al. 2019). Studies using lower rates showed a limited effect or even a promotion of N2O emissions (Kaur et al. 2023). To date, research using biochar at low rates (< 5 t ha−1) is limited, and further knowledge is needed. Additionally, when biochar is co-applied in soil with synthetic fertilizers, the higher the N rate (such as those used in intensive agriculture), the higher the biochar N2O mitigation (Sun et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2020). Studies that compared increasing N fertilization rates used moderate biochar application rates, but there is a need for information on biochar application rates < 0.5% w/w (or < 10 t ha−1).
Recently, the interest on the application of biochar enriched with nutrients, such as N, is rapidly growing. Nutrient-enriched biochars are known as biochar-based fertilizers (BBFs), although some authors referred to them as BCFs or BFs. BBFs use has been described as an efficient strategy to mitigate GHG and to increase N use efficiency (Puga et al. 2020a; Rasse et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023). BBFs may reduce N2O and CH4 emissions with a moderate cost to farmers (Joseph et al. 2021). Thus, BBFs have been regarded as the most cost-effective option for biochar use, as they are usually applied at low rates (< 5 t ha−1) (Robb et al. 2020). Nonetheless, the associated generation of C credits is also small.
Several pre- and post-pyrolysis treatments have been developed to enrich biochar with N (Ndoung et al. 2021). Pre-pyrolysis treatments usually produce BBFs with highly recalcitrant N, whereas post-pyrolysis treatments commonly produce BBFs with slow-release N (Marcińczyk and Oleszczuk 2022). We have recently described post-pyrolysis activation and N-enrichment methods that efficiently incorporate different N forms that could be progressively released for plant nutrition (Castejón-del Pino et al. 2023). The present study tests some of these BBFs in soil. Our aim was to test N2O mitigation using low rates of either (i) BBFs or (ii) biochar co-applied with N fertilization. We hypothesized that (1) BBFs and, to a lesser extent, the co-application of biochar with a synthetic fertilizer, will reduce yield-scaled N2O emissions as compared to synthetic fertilizer alone and, (2) the higher the N rate co-applied with biochar, the higher the biochar mitigation potential, even at a low biochar application rate.
We performed two parallel experiments to validate these hypotheses. In experiment 1, we measured N2O emissions, crop development, and N uptake, in a radish crop fertilized with either BBFs, urea, or biochar co-applied with urea. In experiment 2, we tested the co-application of low rates of biochar with a high N fertilization rate.
Materials and methods
Materials
The soil was sampled between crop rows in an irrigated fifty-year old lemon orchard located in Santomera (Murcia, Spain), coordinates 38°04′17′′ N, 1°03′08′′ W. The soil was characterized by a low organic matter concentration (1.5%), a clay texture (15.5% sand, 48.7% clay, and 35.8% silt), and a high concentration of calcium carbonates (54%), which is common in our area and in some other Mediterranean regions (Durán et al. 2023). The main physico-chemical characteristics of the soil (0–300 mm depth) are presented in Table S1.
Biochars were prepared from olive-tree pruning residues at the highest pyrolysis temperatures of 400 °C (B400) and 800 °C (B800). Raw biochars, B400 and B800, had low N concentrations (0.68 and 0.81% N, respectively). BBFs were prepared from B400 (BBF400) and B800 (BBF800), activated with HNO3 and N-enriched with urea (Castejón-del Pino et al. 2023). The nitrogen concentrations of BBF400 and BBF800 were 6.36% N and 2.87% N, respectively. About two thirds of the N in both BBFs were readily available to plants, whereas most of the N in the raw biochars was not available. The C concentration varied depending on the pyrolysis temperature. The C concentration in B400 and BBF400 was 73.2 and 56.8%, respectively, whereas in B800 and BBF800, it was 82.0 and 76.9%, respectively. A detailed description about the preparation and characterization of the biochars and the BBFs can be found in Castejón-del Pino et al. (2023).
Experimental design
Two parallel pot experiments were conducted under identical environmental conditions. The experiments were carried out in the summer of 2021 in a greenhouse at the Agroforestry Experimental Station of the University of Murcia (Spain). The climate conditions inside the greenhouse were stable over the experiments, with the average daily temperature ranging from 22.4 to 24.5 °C, and the average daily relative humidity ranging from 52.8 to 69.4%. The experiments followed a completely randomized design, and were established including the following treatments with three replicates.
The treatments in experiment 1 were the following:
-
(i)
Control without fertilization (No fertilization);
-
(ii)
Urea fertilization (U);
-
(iii)
Co-application of urea fertilization with biochar pyrolyzed at 400 °C (U + B400);
-
(iv)
Co-application of urea fertilization with biochar pyrolyzed at 800 °C (U + B800);
-
(v)
Biochar-based fertilizer produced with biochar pyrolyzed at 400 °C (BBF400);
-
(vi)
Biochar-based fertilizer produced with biochar pyrolyzed at 800 °C (BBF800).
The treatments in experiment 2 were the following:
-
(i)
Double urea fertilization (2U);
-
(ii)
Co-application of 2U fertilization with biochar pyrolyzed at 400 °C (2U + B400);
-
(iii)
Co-application of 2U fertilization with biochar pyrolyzed at 800 °C (2U + B800).
In the first experiment, fertilized pots (U, U + biochars and BBFs) were adjusted to 90 kg N ha−1 according to radish N requirements. The fertilization treatments were applied once at the beginning of the experiment. In the second experiment, the rate of urea was doubled. Nitrogen fertilization treatments are presented in detail in Table S2. All the pots were fertilized with P and K (17 and 91 kg ha−1, respectively). The pots were drip irrigated with tap water, taking into account the crop needs according to climatic conditions and crop stage (60–120 mL pot−1 every 2 days). We applied the same amount of BBF and raw biochar, considering the radish N requirements and the N in BBF. For instance, 0.06% w/w was applied for BBF400 and B400, and 0.14% w/w for BBF800 and B800. These proportions of application were comparable to 1.4 t ha−1 (BBF400 and B400) and 3.1 t ha−1 (BBF800 and B800).
Radish seeds (Raphanus sativus var. National 2) were sown at a depth of 10–15 mm (four per pot and only one seedling was left to grow). The pot dimensions were 100 × 100 × 120 mm and 800 mL in volume, and they were filled with 1000 g of soil. Plants grew for 11 weeks until most radish plants reached the minimum commercial diameter (20 mm).
Plants and soil measurements
The growth of radish plants was monitored weekly by measuring leaf length and width of all leaves and calculating the mean. At the end of the growing period, radishes were harvested, washed with deionized water and oven-dried at 60 °C. Radish fresh and dry yields were measured considering radish bulb and leaves. Nitrogen concentration was determined by elemental analysis of ball-milled samples (automatic elemental analyzer CHNS-932, LECO, USA).
At the end of the experiment, soils were air-dried, milled and sieved (< 2 mm) for elemental and water-soluble analyses. Fresh soil was used for NH4+–N determination. NH4+–N was measured in a 2 M KCl extract (1:20 w/v), after shaking soil for 2 h, centrifuging for 15 min at 2028 x g and filtered (< 0.45 μm). NH4+ was measured with a colorimetric method based on Berthelot’s reaction (Sommer et al. 1992). Total N, total C, and total organic C were measured by elemental analysis of ball-milled soil samples as described for plant samples. Soil water extracts (1:20 w/v) were shaken for 2 h, centrifuged for 15 min at 2028 x g and filtered (< 0.45 μm). Dissolved total, inorganic, and organic C were determined by an aqueous elemental analyzer (multi N/C 3100, Analytik Jena, Germany), and NO3−–N was analyzed with ion chromatography (ICS 2100, Dionex, USA).
N2O emissions monitoring
N2O fluxes were regularly monitored during the experiments. Initially, we measured N2O fluxes once or twice per day and, after 2 weeks, when emissions were low and stable, the measurements were performed twice per week. N2O concentrations were measured at time 0 and 1 h after closing the chambers using a photo-acoustic gas monitor (1412i Lumasense Technologies A/S, Ballerup, Denmark). The chambers had a volume of 4.2 L and dimensions of 210 × 150 × 220 mm. The pots were introduced into the static polypropylene chambers only during gas accumulation and measurements, using a whole-plant static chamber technique (Clough et al. 2020) as shown in Figure S1. N2O emissions were calculated by the linear increase in N2O concentration during the accumulation period, expressed in mg N2O–N m−2 soil, as shown in the Supplementary Material (Figure S2). The volume of the pot was subtracted from the volume of the chamber to calculate the N2O emissions.
Calculations and statistical analysis
Yield-scaled N2O emissions were calculated with the following equation:
where cumulative (cum) N2O emissions and plant N uptake are expressed in g of N. Furthermore, N2O intensity was calculated as the kg of N2O emitted per ton of dry plant yield as follows:
where cum N2O emissions are expressed in kg ha−1, and dry product in t ha−1.
The N2O emission factor (EF) was calculated by subtracting the cumulative N2O emissions of the treatments and the cumulative N2O emissions of the no fertilization treatment, and dividing it by the N fertilization rate, as shown in the equation:
where the cum N2O emissions are expressed in mg kg−1 of soil and the N applied with the fertilization treatment as mg kg−1 of soil. The N applied used in the estimation of the N2O emission factor is either the N applied with urea or the available N fraction in the case of the BBFs; excluding the non-available N for plants applied with the biochar and BBFs.
Significant differences between treatments were analyzed through a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post-hoc analyses were performed with Tukey-b analysis, and significant differences were established at p < 0.05. Data were ln-transformed when necessary. Levene’s test was used for homogeneity of variance, and the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. Additionally, significant differences between treatments from paired samples were analyzed through t test analyses at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v. 27.0.1., Sommers, USA.
Results
Experiment 1. Comparison of BBFs, urea and co-application of biochar with urea
Radish crop development
Plant yield showed significant differences between non-fertilized and fertilized plants. Although the differences among fertilized treatments were not statistically significant, BBFs tended to reduce crop yields (Table 1). This decline was only evident at the end of the experiment, when a reduction in plant development, measured as leaf length and width, was observed in both BBFs treatments (Figure S3). Figure 1 shows plant N uptake, plant-available N applied, as well as total N applied. The lower plant-available N in BBFs treatments influenced yield and N concentration in plant tissues, which was significantly lower in BBF400 as compared to the rest of fertilization treatments.
Area and yield-scaled N2O emissions
BBFs registered the lowest cumulative N2O–N emissions of the fertilized treatments (Table 1). As compared to urea fertilization, BBF400 and BBF800 reduced N2O emissions by 13 and 47%, respectively. The U + B400 treatment resulted in the highest emissions, being significantly higher than the U treatment. On the other hand, the U + B800 treatment resulted in an intermediate emission between U and U + 400.
The highest N2O flux peaks of all treatments occurred between days 4 and 7 of the experiment (Fig. 2). However, the dynamics of N2O fluxes varied depending on the fertilization treatment. The addition of urea alone or combined with biochar produced a single N2O peak that reached 7.5 and 9 mg N2O–N per kg of soil on days 4 and 5, respectively. However, the BBFs treatments showed two N2O flux peaks that reached 1 and 2.5 N2O–N per kg of soil from day 0 to day 7. After day 10, no significant emissions were recorded for any treatment.
No fertilization and the BBF800 treatments showed the lowest yield-scaled N2O emissions (Table 1), which were significantly lower than the rest of the treatments. BBF800 showed a similar yield as the U treatment, although significantly lower N2O emissions, which were equivalent to the no fertilization treatment. Therefore, BBF800 increased radish yield without significantly raising N2O emissions. The co-application of biochars with urea presented the highest N2O–N intensity, which was statistically higher than the U treatment. BBF800 showed the lowest N2O intensity, although no statistical difference was found when compared to the U treatment.
Relevant soil physicochemical characteristics at the end of the experiment.
At the end of the experiment, soils amended with biochars and BBFs presented a higher total N concentration than soils fertilized only with urea and non-fertilized soil, although this was not statistically significant (Table S3). Biochars and BBFs treatments also showed a lower plant N uptake than treatments fertilized with urea alone (Fig. 1). All the treatments showed low NO3−–N and NH4+–N concentrations at the end of the experiment (below 5.7 and 8.7 mg kg−1 respectively), with the BBF800 and U treatments exhibiting the highest NH4+–N concentrations. The pH and EC values were similar for all treatments at the end of the experiment. All treatments showed a slight decrease from the initial pH (9.1), and an increase in EC from the initial value (320 µS cm−1) (Table S4). Changes in soil organic C concentration were not perceivable at the end of the experiment because of the low amount of applied biochar (Table S5).
Experiment 2: Biochar effect on N2O emissions and crop yield under excessive N fertilization
The co-application of biochar (B400 or B800) with double urea fertilization significantly increased the radish yield compared to the 2U treatment (Table S6). However, the treatments showed a similar N uptake at a high N application rate, reaching N concentrations in the range of 37.0–41.6 mg N plant−1.
The co-application of B400 or B800 with urea at a low N rate produced an increase of 51 and 33% of the N2O emissions per kg of N fertilizer applied, as compared to fertilizing with urea alone. The N2O emission factors of the treatments are shown in Fig. 3. Fertilizing with excess urea, resulted in a 14.9 and 48.8% reduction in the N2O emission factor, with biochar use being an efficient strategy for the reduction of the emission factors, despite it being applied at a low rate (1.4–3.1 t ha−1).
Similar to the N2O emissions, the results of yield-scaled emissions were contrasting depending on the N application rate. Whereas treatments with biochar increased yield-scaled emissions at a low N rate, the same biochar treatments reduced the yield-scaled emissions at a high N rate. Treatments 2U + B400 and 2U + B800 showed yield-scaled N2O emissions of 16.19 and 8.85 g N2O–N kg N uptake−1, respectively, while the 2U treatment showed 17.95 g N2O–N kg N uptake−1 (Table S6).
Discussion
BBFs as a fertilization strategy to reduce N2O emissions and maintain crop yields
BBFs reduced N2O emissions as compared to urea, supporting our first hypothesis. Many recent studies have found a decrease in GHG and NH3 emissions after the application of BBFs as compared to fertilizers alone (Puga et al. 2020b; Zhou et al. 2021; Pereira et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023). We expected both BBFs and the co-application of biochar with urea to decrease N2O emissions as compared to the urea treatment, and hypothesized even lower N2O emissions for BBFs due to the controlled-release of N from these materials. A slow N-release from BBFs has been proposed as the main mechanism explaining low N losses after BBF application (Shi et al. 2020). However, the comparison between the application of BBF and the co-application of biochar with synthetic fertilizers has been less investigated. In our study, BBFs were characterized by (a) a low water-soluble N (10–15%), (b) a high proportion of slowly available N (45–55%) and (c) a relevant proportion of N that is strongly embedded in the biochar structure and not available in the medium term (35–45%) (Castejón-del Pino et al. 2023).
The presence of several small peaks observed in the N2O fluxes of the BBF treatments (Fig. 2) demonstrates that BBFs released N at different rates, which was dependent on their chemical composition. In contrast, the urea treatments only showed a high peak of N2O fluxes, which accounted for most of the cumulative N2O emissions. Zhang et al. (2023) hypothesized that BBFs could reduce N emissions through other mechanisms aside from N retention, often associated with the impact of biochar itself on soil microorganisms. They proposed a reduction of the urease/protease activities by the adsorption of soil enzymes and a reduction of the denitrification activity because of the improved soil aeration. Rasse et al. (2022) also reported enhanced characteristics of BBFs and other engineered biochars, in comparison to raw biochars, to reduce GHG emissions, but mainly associated with N retention and slow-release of N.
Contrary to our first hypothesis, the co-application of biochar with urea increased the total cumulative N2O emissions as compared to the urea treatment. Although meta-analyses showed an average decrease of N2O emissions after biochar application, a few studies have reported an increase in N2O emissions (Sánchez-García et al. 2014; Wells and Baggs 2014), where biochar enhanced N2O emissions through nitrification pathways. Thus, in soils prone to N2O emissions by nitrification, which could be our case, the use of BBFs might represent an advantage to the co-application of biochar with urea.
Biochar usually reduces N2O emissions by either directly decreasing the denitrification process or by promoting the last step of denitrification (Joseph et al. 2021). However, most studies use higher biochar application rates (between 0.5 and 10% w/w) than the rates used in this study (0.06% w/w of BBF400 and B400 and 0.14% w/w of BBF800 and B800). Biochar application rates > 10 t ha−1 have been found to significantly reduce N2O emissions (Cayuela et al. 2014; Kaur et al. 2023). Lower amounts of biochar (as < 0.5%) have been previously reported to not affect or even increase N2O emissions (Borchard et al. 2019). Our study confirms that a low rate of biochar may increase N2O emissions, especially when the biochar is produced at a low temperature.
Pyrolysis temperature influences the effect of biochar on N2O emissions, since biochars produced at high temperatures (> 500 °C) usually show higher N2O mitigation potential than biochars produced at lower temperatures (Cayuela et al. 2014; Weldon et al. 2019). In the case of the BBFs, the influence of the pyrolysis temperature had not been studied before. Nevertheless, we observed a similar trend as that of raw biochars: BBF800 led to lower N2O emissions than BBF400. This might represent an important advantage of BBFs produced at a high temperature when considering the trade-offs between C sequestration and N2O emissions. Biochars produced at a high temperature are much more recalcitrant to microbial degradation in soil, leading to longer-term C storage (Ippolito et al. 2020). Nonetheless, the lower biochar yields at higher pyrolysis temperatures should also be considered when assessing overall CO2 removal. Apart from the reduction in N2O emissions, BBFs synthesized with high-temperature biochars have shown a better performance as slow-release fertilizers (Jia et al. 2020). In addition, Melo et al. (2022), in a recent meta-analysis, showed that BBFs with a high C concentration, such as the ones produced at high temperatures, led to higher crop productivity.
There is only limited information about the impact of BBF on yield-scaled N2O emissions. BBFs are expected to play a role in the reduction of N2O emissions, as there is some evidence on increasing N use efficiency (Shi et al. 2020; Puga et al. 2020a). In our study, the yield-scaled N2O emissions of the BBF800 treatment were similar to the no fertilization treatment, whereas the yield was significantly higher (Table 1). Additionally, we observed a trend in which the BBFs treatments increased the total N concentration in soil at the end of the experiment, which was not readily available for plants (Table S3). This is especially relevant in the case of short-term crops, where all the N supplied by the BBF may not be available for plants during their period of growth. Our results suggest that in short-cycle crops, N fertilization rates should be adjusted considering the available N in the short term (water soluble N and hydrolyzable N). This would imply an increased N input with BBFs, which would result in reduced fertilization requirements for subsequent crops under rotation. However, this hypothesis requires further field studies to be validated.
High nitrogen application rates lead to increased biochar N2O mitigation
In our study, low rates of biochar co-applied with the recommended rate of urea for radish growth (90 kg N ha−1) increased N2O emissions. In contrast, the same biochars reduced the N2O emission factor when the rate of urea was doubled (Fig. 3). This finding confirms our second hypothesis, especially with the biochar produced at a high temperature (B800), as this treatment was efficient in mitigating N2O emissions at a high N rate, although not at a low N rate. Although meta-analyses have shown that N fertilization rate does not significantly change the effect of biochar on N2O emissions, this result could be due to confounding factors. For instance, studies with high N rates may have been carried out with low C:N biochars, in very acidic or very alkaline soils, or in combination with organic amendments, where mitigation is known to be less efficient (Borchard et al. 2019). However, experimental studies analyzing the co-application of biochar with increasing rates of N under identical environmental conditions found a higher mitigation efficiency with increasing N fertilization (Sun et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2020).
In a controlled soil column experiment, Wang et al. (2020) showed that whereas the co-application of biochar with a low N rate increased N2O emissions, the application of biochar with high N concentrations significantly reduced the emissions, even at low biochar rates (0.5% w/w). Similarly, Sun et al. (2017) showed that by increasing N fertilization, biochar progressively reduced N2O emissions. However, all the previous studies applied higher biochar rates than the rates used in this study, i.e. 0.5–2% w/w (Wang et al. 2020) and 10 t ha−1 (Sun et al. 2017).
In our study, we used very low biochar rates (0.06–0.14% w/w equivalent to 1.4–3.1 t ha−1), but we still found lower yield-scaled N2O emissions and N2O intensity with the co-application of biochar with urea at a high N rate, as compared to the application of urea alone, especially for 2U + B800 (Table S6). This finding contrasted with the results obtained with the application of 90 kg N ha−1, where U + B800 did not significantly decrease yield-scaled N2O emissions as compared to U. The co-application of biochar with urea at a high N rate not only reduced N2O emissions, but also increased the plant yield (Table S6); in contrast to other studies that did not find a significantly higher crop yield or N uptake by plants (Sun et al. 2017). In our study, fertilizing plants with twice the amount of urea reduced the germination rate in treatment 2U as compared to U (data not shown), but pots that contained biochar were not affected by the large amount of urea. This could be due to the ability of biochar to adsorb the excess N, as reflected in the N retained in soil at the end of the experiment (Table S6).
Soil N2O emissions are known to increase exponentially with N application rates, and several studies found that under the same experimental conditions, the higher the N2O emissions, the higher the biochar mitigation (Cayuela et al. 2013; Thomazini et al. 2015), which is consistent with our results. The reason for this may be related to a shift in N2O formation pathways with increasing N concentration in soil. Further studies are needed to test this hypothesis.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that using small amounts of BBF800, which is produced with biochar pyrolyzed at a high temperature, leads to yields similar to synthetic fertilizers, and lower yield-scaled N2O emissions. BBF800 showed N fertilization comparable to synthetic fertilizers, providing at the same time additional stable organic N (as shown it Table S1), which could be subsequently used by crops as it slowly mineralizes in soil. Our results indicate that N fertilization rates should be calculated considering the available N in the BBFs during the crop growing period to avoid a decline in crop yield. In addition, the application of low rates of high-temperature biochar might represent a cost-effective option for decreasing the yield-scaled N2O emissions in commercial fields with high N inputs, such as those under vegetable crop production.
Change history
15 May 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-024-10354-9
References
Azzi ES, Karltun E, Sundberg C (2021) Small-scale biochar production on swedish farms: a model for estimating potential, variability, and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 280:124873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124873
Baveye PC (2023) Unknown economic costs of biochar applications to soils: they should be considered in the on-going debate. Resour Conserv Recycl 192:106911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106911
Borchard N, Schirrmann M, Cayuela ML et al (2019) Biochar, soil and land-use interactions that reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emissions: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 651:2354–2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.060
Castejón-del Pino R, Cayuela ML, Sánchez-García M, Sánchez-Monedero MA (2023) Nitrogen availability in biochar-based fertilizers depending on activation treatment and nitrogen source. Waste Manag 158:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.01.007
Cayuela ML, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A et al (2013) Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Sci Rep 3:1732. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01732
Cayuela ML, van Zwieten L, Singh BP et al (2014) Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: a review and meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009
Cayuela ML, Jeffery S, van Zwieten L (2015) The molar H:Corg ratio of biochar is a key factor in mitigating N2O emissions from soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 202:135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.015
Clough TJ, Rochette P, Thomas SM et al (2020) Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: design considerations. J Environ qual 49:1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20117
Durán GA, Sacristán D, Farrús E, Vadell J (2023) Towards defining soil quality of Mediterranean calcareous agricultural soils: reference values and potential core indicator set. Int Soil Water Conserv Res S2095633923000400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.001
FAO (2020) FAO. [Total emissions]. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Extracted from: [https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT]. Data of Access: [16-05-2023]
Grados D, Butterbach-Bahl K, Chen J et al (2022) Synthesizing the evidence of nitrous oxide mitigation practices in agroecosystems. Environ Res Lett 17:114024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9b50
IPCC (2023) Climate change 2023: synthesis report. Mitigation of climate change. Sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Ippolito JA, Cui L, Kammann C et al (2020) Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar 2:421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x
Jia Y, Hu Z, Mu J et al (2020) Preparation of biochar as a coating material for biochar-coated urea. Sci Total Environ 731:139063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139063
Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L et al (2021) How biochar works, and when it doesn’t: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy 13:1731–1764. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12885
Kaur N, Kieffer C, Ren W, Hui D (2023) How much is soil nitrous oxide emission reduced with biochar application? An evaluation of meta-analyses. GCB Bioenergy 15:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13003
Marcińczyk M, Oleszczuk P (2022) Biochar and engineered biochar as slow- and controlled-release fertilizers. J Clean Prod 339:130685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130685
Melo LCA, Lehmann J, Carneiro JSdaS, Camps-Arbestain M (2022) Biochar-based fertilizer effects on crop productivity: a meta-analysis. Plant Soil 472:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05276-2
Myrold DD (2021) Transformations of nitrogen. Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 385–421
Ndoung OCN, de Figueiredo CC, Ramos MLG (2021) A scoping review on biochar-based fertilizers: enrichment techniques and agro-environmental application. Heliyon 7:e08473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08473
Pereira VV, Morales MM, Pereira DH et al (2022) Activated Biochar-Based Organomineral Fertilizer Delays Nitrogen Release and reduces N2O Emission. Sustainability 14:12388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912388
Puga AP, Grutzmacher P, Cerri CEP et al (2020a) Biochar-based nitrogen fertilizers: greenhouse gas emissions, use efficiency, and maize yield in tropical soils. Sci Total Environ 704:135375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135375
Puga AP, Queiroz MC, de Ligo A MAV, et al (2020b) Nitrogen availability and ammonia volatilization in biochar-based fertilizers. Arch Agron Soil Sci 66:992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1650916
Rasse DP, Weldon S, Joner EJ et al (2022) Enhancing plant N uptake with biochar-based fertilizers: limitation of sorption and prospects. Plant Soil 475:213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05365-w
Rittl TF, Oliveira DMS, Canisares LP et al (2021) High application rates of Biochar to mitigate N2O emissions from a N-Fertilized tropical soil under warming conditions. Front Environ Sci 8:611873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.611873
Robb S, Joseph S, Abdul Aziz A et al (2020) Biochar’s cost constraints are overcome in small-scale farming on tropical soils in lower‐income countries. Land Degrad Dev 31:1713–1726. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3541
Sánchez-García M, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Cayuela ML (2014) Biochar increases soil N2O emissions produced by nitrification-mediated pathways. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00025
Shi W, Ju Y, Bian R et al (2020) Biochar bound urea boosts plant growth and reduces nitrogen leaching. Sci Total Environ 701:134424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134424
Sommer SG, Kjellerup V, Kristjansen O (1992) Determination of total ammonium nitrogen in pig and cattle slurry: sample preparation and analysis. Acta agriculturae scandinavica. Sect B Soil Plant Sci 42:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719209417969
Sun Z, Sänger A, Rebensburg P et al (2017) Contrasting effects of biochar on N2O emission and N uptake at different N fertilizer levels on a temperate sandy loam. Sci Total Environ 578:557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.230
Thomazini A, Spokas K, Hall K et al (2015) GHG impacts of biochar: predictability for the same biochar. Agric Ecosyst Environ 207:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.012
Tian H, Xu R, Canadell JG et al (2020) A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature 586:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0
Van Groenigen JW, Velthof GL, Oenema O et al (2010) Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops. Eur J Soil Sci 61:903–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01217.x
Van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Kimber SWL et al (2014) An incubation study investigating the mechanisms that impact N2O flux from soil following biochar application. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.030
Wang L, Yang K, Gao C, Zhu L (2020) Effect and mechanism of biochar on CO2 and N2O emissions under different nitrogen fertilization gradient from an acidic soil. Sci Total Environ 747:141265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141265
Weldon S, Rasse DP, Budai A et al (2019) The effect of a biochar temperature series on denitrification: which biochar properties matter? Soil Biol Biochem 135:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.018
Wells NS, Baggs EM (2014) Char amendments Impact Soil Nitrous Oxide production during Ammonia Oxidation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1656–1660. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.11.0468n
Zhang S, Zhou J, Chen J et al (2023) Changes in soil CO2 and N2O emissions in response to urea and biochar-based urea in a subtropical Moso bamboo forest. Soil Tillage Res 228:105625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105625
Zhou J, Qu T, Li Y et al (2021) Biochar-based fertilizer decreased while chemical fertilizer increased soil N2O emissions in a subtropical Moso bamboo plantation. CATENA 202:105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105257
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the project PID2021-128896OB-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, co-funded with EU FEDER funds. R. Castejón-del Pino was supported by a JAE Intro fellowship by The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and a FPI fellowship within the project RTI2018-099417-BI00. The authors are very grateful to Mr. Mario Fon for editing the final version of the manuscript. Likewise, thanks to David Rosa for providing the soil used in the experiments and to Mercedes Garrido for her contribution to material preparation and data collection.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by RCP. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RCP and all authors contributed to writing in previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. MASM and MLC secured the funding.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Castejón-del Pino, R., Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Sánchez-García, M. et al. Fertilization strategies to reduce yield-scaled N2O emissions based on the use of biochar and biochar-based fertilizers. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10313-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10313-w