Abstract
The effects of stress during early vertebrate development can be especially harmful. Avoiding stressors in fish larvae is essential to ensure the health of adult fish and their reproductive performance and overall production. We examined the consequences of direct exposure to successive acute stressors during early development, including their effects on miR-29a and its targets, survival, hatching and malformation rates, larval behaviour and cartilage and eye development. Our aim was to shed light on the pleiotropic effects of early-induced stress in this vertebrate model species. Our results showed that direct exposure to successive acute stressors during early development significantly upregulated miR-29a and downregulated essential collagen transcripts col2a1a, col6a2 and col11a1a, decreased survival and increased malformation rates (swim bladder, otoliths, cardiac oedema and ocular malformations), promoting higher rates of immobility in larvae. Our results revealed that stress in early stages can induce different eye tissular architecture and cranioencephalic cartilage development alterations. Our research contributes to the understanding of the impact of stressful conditions during the early stages of zebrafish development, serving as a valuable model for vertebrate research. This holds paramount significance in the fields of developmental biology and aquaculture and also highlights miR-29a as a potential molecular marker for assessing novel larval rearing programmes in teleost species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Stress has been defined as a systemic response to what an organism recognises as a threat (Yaribeygi et al. 2017). It is directly associated with changes in the physiology of the organism and even in its behaviour. Stress acts through various physiological mechanisms that affect the central nervous system (CNS) by dysregulating gene expression in the nervous system, ultimately altering hormone and neurotransmitter production (Yaribeygi et al. 2017). Stress can present two forms: acute or chronic (Thomson et al. 2020; Demin et al. 2021). Acute stress generates rapid alterations in neuronal activity, promoting a quick release of endocrine molecules and neurotransmitters to re-establish physiological homeostasis as quickly as possible (Demin et al. 2021). Chronic stress generates sustained changes in the organism driven by continued altered neurotransmitter and hormone production or gene expression modulation negatively affecting the organism, generating pathologies in multiple systems (Gauthier and Vijayan 2020). Consequently, stress can ultimately affect, in addition to behaviour (Ghisleni et al. 2012), metabolic processes (Heinkele et al. 2021), reproduction (Teng et al. 2020) or survival (Fan et al. 2019). Therefore, stress directly affects animal welfare. All the generated scientific knowledge in this topic has led to increased attention to animal welfare and its certification at animal production facilities by the scientific community, policy-makers and consumers; the aquaculture industry is directly affected by this growing interest (Campbell et al. 2021). In this context, the investigation of new biomarkers to assess animal stress (Aerts et al. 2015) is paramount. At aquaculture facilities, several stress sources can potentially cause pain and stress to individuals, such as feeding protocols, tank cleaning, population assessment and periodic control samplings (Braithwaite and Ebbesson 2014). The impact of stress on cultured species can occur during the larvae to adult life culture; the first stages of the life cycle are crucial to ensure the productive success of the batches and the fish welfare throughout their lives.
In the present work, we use zebrafish (Danio rerio), a popular teleost model species that has been used in a wide range of research areas, such as biomedical research (Choi et al. 2021; Aranda-martínez et al. 2022), ecotoxicology (Abe et al. 2021; Porto et al. 2023) or aquaculture-focused experiments (Dahm and Geisler 2006; Noble et al. 2017), among others. Zebrafish is an excellent model species due to its easy maintenance, prolificacy and external fertilisation (Swaminathan et al. 2023; Amar and Ramachandran 2023). The transparent zebrafish embryo is an exceptional model for studying the interplay between genetic and environmental influences. Danio rerio development is rapid, and embryos remain transparent throughout most of the embryogenesis phase, simplifying the monitoring of the progenies (Kimmel et al. 1995). Zebrafish shows a fast and precisely timed ontogeny, aiding the visual identification of developmental markers (Singleman and Holtzman 2014). Moreover, this model species presents a high genetic and physiological homology with other vertebrates, including humans (Amar and Ramachandran 2023; Lee et al. 2023). These are the many reasons why this species has been used to study the role of environmental influences and external stimuli on larval development (Rosa et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023), such as contaminants (Dai et al. 2014; Bhagat et al. 2020), drugs (Petersen et al. 2021; Rosa et al. 2022) or physiochemical alterations in the environment (Zhang et al. 2023).
In developing vertebrates, genetic factors must perfectly operate in the context of multiple cell interactions and environmental influences and variations. Therefore, regulation of gene expression plays a key molecular role in the development process and the modulation of the response to stressors. Among the different strategies involving the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression, in the present work, we focus on micro-RNAs (miRNA). These small non-coding RNA sequences are single-stranded RNAs between 18 and 26 nucleotides in length that act targeting specific messenger RNA (mRNA), consequently downregulating their gene expression by translational repression, mRNA cleavage and deadenylation (Ambros 2004). As an example of the crucial role of miRNAs in gene expression regulation in humans, these are responsible for regulating up to 60% of protein-coding genes (Hogg and Harries 2014).
Among the several miRNA families, in this work, we choose to focus on the miRNA-29 family (Horita et al. 2021), specifically on miR-29a. Previous results from our group have indicated a dysregulation on this non-coding RNA in zebrafish 7 days post-fertilisation (dpf) larvae derived from crossings involving chronically stressed males with control undisturbed females (Riesco et al. 2023). Like the vast majority of miRNAs, mature forms of the miRNA-29 family are highly conserved in different species, including humans, rats and zebrafish (Garcia-Concejo et al. 2018; Horita et al. 2021). miRNA-29a has been shown to play key roles in controlling early gene expression (Nanda et al. 2020), regulating extracellular matrix (Chuan-hao et al. 2016) and mineralisation (Horita et al. 2021), among others (Shi et al. 2020; Horita et al. 2021). Therefore, this miRNA affects relevant biological processes of great importance in the field of aquaculture since the existence of malformations or alterations in early development can negatively affect companies in this industry economically (Eissa et al. 2021).
We hypothesise that short periods of stress suffered during early larval stages in zebrafish can alter miR-29a levels, producing phenotypic alterations in larvae. The aim of the present study is to generate knowledge about potential stress biomarkers in teleost larvae. These biotechnological tools will be valuable for the aquaculture industry, allowing the evaluation of potential new larvae culture protocols by determining stress levels not only from survival, malformation rates or biometry parameters but also from a molecular prism.
Methods
Fish husbandry and larvae exposure to stressors
Zebrafish eggs (Danio rerio; AB wild-type strain) were obtained from natural spawning family crossings at the Animal Research and Welfare Service facilities of the University of Léon (Spain). Fertilised eggs were selected within the blastula period at 3 h post-fertilisation (hpf) and incubated in embryo medium (EM: 0.137 M NaCl; 5.4 mM KCl; 0.25 mM Na2H PO4; 0.44 mM KH2 PO4; 1.3 mM CaCl2; 1.0 mM Mg SO4: 4.2 mM NaH CO3) at 27.5 ± 0.5 °C during the entire experiment. The biological replicate was defined as a Petri dish (⌀: 5.5 cm) filled with 8 mL of EM containing 30 individuals. The daily upkeep included an EM volume change every 24 h. Eight different crossings were used to produce the biological replicates to work with different genetic backgrounds. Two culture conditions (control: S−; stress: S+) were used during the first 7 days of life of the individuals. Stress induction consisted in a 6-day protocol including different types of acute stressors. Six stressors (Yeh et al. 2013; Bai et al. 2016) were used in this protocol (one acute stressor per day from 1 to 6 dpf; Fig. 1A): (1) cooling, decreasing the temperature in the Petri dish to 20.50 °C ± 2.50 °C for 5 min at 1 dpf; (2) chemical, 2% EtOH exposure for 10 min at 2 dpf; (3) heating, raising the temperature in the Petri dish to 31.50 °C ± 1.5 °C for 5 min at 3 dpf; (4) mechanical, shaking (orbital shaker; 200 rpm) for 5 min at 4 dpf; (5) “osmotic”, 0.25 M NaCl exposure for 10 min at 5 dpf; and (6) “pH”, 1 mM HCl exposure for 10 min at 6 dpf. All the stressors were applied outside the incubator. While stressors were being applied, the S− replicates were also removed from the incubator to avoid potential bias in the resulting data.
Physiological response to stressors
Survival, hatching and malformation percentages
Mortality was assessed by daily (1 to 7 dpf) removal of dead individuals from the dishes. The hatching rate (percentage of hatched larvae per live animals within the biological replicate) was calculated at 3 dpf. Malformation rate (percentage of malformed larvae per live animals within the biological replicate) was calculated at 5 dpf under stereomicroscope (SMZ1500, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The malformations evaluated in this study included: uninflated swimming bladder, non-canonical otoliths, jaw malformations and lymphoedema formation. Representative examples of control and malformed larvae were anaesthetised in 0.02% tricaine (MS222, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) at 5 and 7 dpf for image and video collection from a lateral perspective using a Nikon DS-Fi3 digital camera.
Cranial and eye development
Larvae cartilage development analysis was performed using whole-mount alcian blue staining in 7-dpf specimens. Larvae from both groups showing normal and malformed phenotypes were fixed in 4% (w/v) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-buffered paraformaldehyde (4 °C, o/n). After fixation, samples were stored at 4 °C in 70% EtOH. Alcian blue staining was performed according to Valcarce et al. (2017) (Valcarce et al. 2017). Stained larvae were ventrally placed under a stereomicroscope and photographed. The resulting images were processed with ImageJ software (Schneider et al. 2012) to obtain two measurements of the eye dimensions, labelled as M1 and M2, respectively, corresponding to the major and minor axes of the virtual ellipse generated from the eye area (Fig. 4B). Images were also used to measure head length, ceratohyal cartilage length, lower jaw length and Meckel’s–palatoquadrate angle (M-PQ; Fig. 5A).
Larval behaviour
For the behavioural assessment, larvae swimming activity was first measured at 7 dpf by counting the number of immotile larvae in each plate after 1 min. Then, we performed a previously described novel tank test (NTT) for zebrafish larvae (Valcarce et al. 2017). Live larvae showing a motile activity in their housing dish (8 animals per biological replicate; replicate size: S−: n = 18; S+: n = 21) were randomly selected and evaluated. Each larva was individually placed in a novel Petri dish (⌀: 5.5 cm) and let to adapt to the new environment for 1 min; subsequently, animal behaviour was video recorded for 5 min. Tracker software (physlets.org/tracker/) was used for larvae swimming tracking. Each resulting trajectory was processed using a virtual 16-zone grid pattern (8 inner and 8 outer subareas) to compare fish exploration (Fig. 3B).
RNA extraction
Total RNA was isolated from 25 randomly selected 7-dpf larvae per replicate (9 biological replicates per experimental group) using the miRNeasy Tissue/Cells Advanced Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, to ensure complete tissue lysis and RNase inactivation, 260 µL of Buffer RLT was added to the samples, and afterwards, they were disrupted and homogenised. After centrifugation and supernatant recovery, 80 µL of Buffer AL was added to each sample to optimise gDNA removal in the gDNA eliminator spin column. Subsequently, 20 µL of Buffer RPP was added to the flow-through to precipitate inhibitors by centrifugation. Isopropanol was then added to the supernatant containing RNA, and the sample was applied to the RNeasy Mini spin column, where total RNA bounds to the membrane. Finally, RNA, including miRNA and other small RNA, was eluted in 30 µL of RNase-free water. Purity and quantity of the resulting RNA samples were analysed using a DeNovix® spectrophotometer (DeNovix Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA), while RNA integrity was assessed on agarose gel.
Reverse transcription
Total RNA (starting from 10 ng) was reverse transcribed using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) with specific TaqMan Small RNA probes (5 ×) for dre-miR-29a (MI0001938) and dre-miR-92a (MIMAT0001808) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. miR-92a-3p was selected as reference miRNA as previously reported in zebrafish larvae samples (Riesco et al. 2019). For mRNA reverse transcription, complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained from 2 μg total RNA using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
All quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiments were conducted in technical triplicates (n = 9) on a QuantStudio™ 1 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) under standard thermal conditions. The reactions for the quantification of miRNA expression levels were prepared following the protocol for TaqMan Universal PCR master mix II (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). The reactions for the quantification of mRNA expression levels contained 10 μL of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Warrington, UK), 1 μL of each 10 μM forward and reverse primer, 2 μL of cDNA sample and 6 μL of molecular biology degree water up to 20 μL. We analysed gene expression changes of transcripts related to retinoic acid (rarga, rxrba, rxrbb) and cartilage (col2a1a, col2a1b, col6a2, col6a3, col11a1). A list of primers can be found in Additional file 1: Table S1. We performed a melting curve analysis to determine the specificity of qPCR reactions. The BestKeeper tool (Pfaffl et al. 2004) was used for the selection of the optimal housekeeping gene (HKG) in the experiment. Three reference genes were studied: actin beta 2 (actb2; (Riesco et al. 2014)), eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1a (eef1a1a; (Tang et al. 2007)) and ribosomal protein S18 (rps18; (Divisato et al. 2016)). Gene expression was normalised relative to actb2 as HKG, since this was reported to be the best candidate exhibiting the lowest variation and, therefore, the most stably expressed of the three studied HKGs.
Histology
At 7 dpf, control and malformed larvae were fixed in 4% (w/v) PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde (4 °C, o/n). Then, samples were pre-embedded in 1% agarose (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) to facilitate the correct orientation during sectioning. For microtome sectioning, all fish were dehydrated and paraffin embedded in a Myr STP-120 tissue processor. Serial orthogonal and sagittal 2.5-μm-thick sections were obtained using a Leica RM2255 rotary microtome. Sections were stained with haematoxylin–eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome to visualise mesenchymal tissue. Sections were dehydrated and mounted with DPX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich,MO, USA). We observed the resulting sections under a light microscope Olympus BX61 and took microphotographs using a DS-Fi3 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) camera attached to a E600 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) microscope. Morphometric analysis was performed using ImageJ software (v1.54 g; (Schneider et al. 2012)).
Statistics and reproducibility
All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). All assays were performed on at least 9 replicates (N), and each consisted in a sample size (n) of 9–30 fish. The comparison of survival curves was performed with a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Data from the remaining experiments were tested for deviation from the Gaussian ideal using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. For normally distributed data, experimental groups were compared using a two-tailed t test (with Welch’s correction when the variances of the variables were not equal after running a F test). For non-parametric data, a Mann–Whitney test was run. All data are shown as mean ± SEM (*p < 0.0500; **p < 0.0100; ****p < 0.0001; ns, no statistically significant differences).
Results
Physiological impact of daily stressors on zebrafish development
To confirm the impact of exposure to successive acute stressors during early stages on the development of the organism, embryos were monitored from 24 hpf to 7 dpf. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve comparison shows statistically significant differences (p = 0.0018) between control larvae and those exposed to stressors (Fig. 1B). However, the survival rate was high in both groups, over 90% in both cases, reporting a subtle effect of the selected combination of stressors on larvae viability.
No statistically significant differences (p = 0.7854) were found between the two groups in the hatching percentage at 72 hpf (Fig. 1C). Collected data showed almost equal mean values for this parameter in both experimental groups (around 75%), revealing an absence of impact of the exposure to successive acute stressors on embryo hatching ability. However, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found for the malformation ratio at day 5. The combination of acute stressors increased by 3.7 times the appearance of altered phenotypes at this key point in time in the S+ biological replicates compared with that in the S− standard cultured ones (S+, 6.411 ± 1.585%; S−, 22.42 ± 1.614%; Fig. 1D). Malformed larvae in the S+ group presented a combination of the following features: (1) uninflated swimming bladder, (2) non-canonical otoliths, (3) jaw malformations and (4) lymphoedema formation (abundant cases of pericardial lymphoedema; Fig. 1E). These alterations were also detected at the end of the trial (7 dpf), and in some cases were even more noticeable at this key point (Additional file 2: Video S1).
Molecular impact of daily stressors on larvae miR-29a levels
We studied the expression of zebrafish miR-29a as this has been explored as a regulatory molecule involved in stress response modulation both in animal models (Riesco et al. 2023) and humans (Maffioletti et al. 2021). Larvae from the S+ replicates showed a statistically significant miR-29a upregulation (p = 0.0129) compared with their non-disturbed control counterparts. The qPCR analysis reported a threefold change increase in the expression of miR-29a (Fig. 2A).
Considering TargetScanFish data, miR-29a potentially targets a list of 2208 mRNAs. The complete list of targeted genes can be found in Additional file 3: Table S2. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis is presented in Fig. 2B where statistically significant GO entries (multicellular organism development (GO:0007275; p = 1.488 × 10−5), system development (GO:0048731; p = 1.142 × 10−2), multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501; p = 2.027 × 10−4), anatomical structure development (GO:0048856; p = 2.247 × 10−4), developmental process (GO:0032502; p = 3.679 × 10−4), embryo development (GO:0009790; p = 1.142 × 10−2), animal organ development (GO:0048513; p = 2.353 × 10−2) and nervous system development (GO:0007399; p = 3.039 × 10−2)) are displayed in a tree connecting edges between the term nodes for a clearer description of the biological context.
Early stress exposure impact on zebrafish behaviour
Exposure to stressors caused higher rates of immobility in the S+ experimental group (p < 0.0001). While in the control group the number of immobile larvae on the plate at day 7 dpf represented around 5% of the total, the replicates subjected to stress during their early stages of development showed a mean value of approximately 15% of the individuals (Fig. 3A). The analysis of larvae behaviour using the chosen NTT (Fig. 3B) allowed to evaluate the exploration of pattern preference in a new environment of the motile larvae from each experimental group. Resulting tracks (Fig. 3C) were processed focusing on the whole new area (all), the peripheral zone (outer) and the central zone of the explorable arena (inner). No statistically significant differences were found either in the global arena (p = 0.3663), the outer (p = 0.5014) or the inner (p = 0.1472) scoring comparison (Fig. 3D). Thus, motile larvae from each experimental group showed similar behaviour patterns, with a general scoring of around the 70% of the new exploration arena in both groups (Fig. 3C). Specimens from both groups tended to explore more the peripheral zone (outer) of the new arena, a behaviour usually found in experiments evaluating swimming patterns in zebrafish larvae (Schnörr et al. 2012). Although no statistically significant differences were found between experimental conditions, we deemed worthy to highlight the distribution of the two groups in the outer sub-evaluation (Fig. 3D, dotted-line box).
Effects of early stress exposure on eye development
To further explore the effects of early stress on larvae, we analysed eye development. At 7 dpf, one of the most evident subjective features (Fig. 4A) of the malformed phenotype was microphthalmia (abnormally small eyes). We corroborated this subjective observation by measuring eye size in alcian blue-stained larvae (Fig. 4B). The quantification of the size of both the major (M1) and the minor (M2) axes of the virtual ellipse corresponding to the area occupied by the eyes revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001; Fig. 4C). The histological study of the eye corroborated a different tissular architecture when normally developed and malformed specimens were compared (Fig. 4D). Finally, we performed gene expression analyses on three retinoic acid (RA)-related genes: RA receptor gamma a (rarga), retinoid × receptor beta a (rxrba) and retinoid × receptor beta b (rxrbb). We focused on RA genes because RA acts as a crucial signal for development of the vertebrate eye by governing the transcriptional regulatory activity of RA receptors (RARs) (Duester 2008); also, the selected three transcripts are targeted by miR-29a (Additional file 4: Figure S1A). Gene expression results did not reveal statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.0500); however, a downregulation trend was found for the three studied genes in the stress-exposed experimental group (Fig. 4E).
Effects of early stress exposure on cartilage development
We decided to further study collagen-related parameters due to the abnormal otoliths, the reduction in the size of the jaw (micrognathia) and the evident alteration of the cranioencephalic development that we found in the malformed specimens of the S+ group (Fig. 1A) and also because miRNA-29a had already been shown to play key roles in regulating extracellular matrix (Chuan-hao et al. 2016) and mineralisation (Horita et al. 2021). First, we performed specific alcian blue staining for cartilage (main structural tissue at this life stage in the developing skeleton), tissue characterised by a collagen-rich extracellular matrix. The whole mount staining revealed clear severe anomalies in the cartilages (Fig. 5A). Qualitatively, malformed larvae showed shorter heads and shorter cartilages. The detailed image analysis with ImageJ (Fig. 5A; diagram) reported statistically significant differences in three of the measurements (Fig. 5B). Lower jaw length and head length were reported to be statistically significant shorter in the malformed larvae (p = 0.0323 and p = 0.0010, respectively). Similarly, the M-PQ angle was found to be wider (p = 0.0070) in malformed larvae (51.80 ± 4.448) compared with that in the control ones (36.75 ± 0.8961). The ceratohyal cartilage length did not reveal statistically significant differences (p = 0.1698). We further analysed histologically both the malformed and the canonical larvae (Fig. 5C). The reduction of the head length and abnormal shorted development of cranioencephalic zebrafish cartilages was corroborated in the histological sections. The detailed study of the trabecula chondrocytes in the malformed 7-dpf larvae (Fig. 5D) showed constricted altered chondrocytes, alteration of the characteristic stack-of-coins shape and lower cell volume, presumably affecting the overall craniofacial morphology. To confirm these tissular observations, we performed qPCR analyses for five collagen genes: col2a1a, col2a1b, col6a2, col6a3 and col11a1, all of them targeted by miR-29a (Additional file 4: Figure S1B). Gene expression results revealed a global downregulation trend for the five selected genes (Fig. 5E). In line with the phenotypic and histological results, three of the collagen genes showed statistically significant differences: col2a1a (p = 0.0286), col6a2 (p = 0.0365) and col11a1a (p = 0.0128).
Discussion
In aquaculture, stress is a major concern, as the presence of negative stimuli in hatcheries can predispose fish to growth and health problems and eventually lead to malformations, diseases and increased mortality rates (López-Olmeda et al. 2012; Sánchez-Vázquez et al. 2019; Abdel-Tawwab et al. 2019). Stressors can alter the internal balance of the organism, generating different biochemical, physiological and even behavioural responses to return to the natural homeostasis (Canzian et al. 2021). Beyond the impact that stress can cause in industrial animal production, currently, the scientific community and producers must ensure that animals live in optimal welfare conditions in the facilities (European Commission 2021). Our group has focused lately on the evaluation of the effects of chronic stress on teleost spermatogenesis and its impact on the resulting progenies derived from chronically stressed males (Valcarce et al. 2023a) and in deepening the knowledge on how different protocols reducing the impact of anthropogenic sources of stress can improve fish welfare (Valcarce et al. 2023b). In the present work, we aim to gain insight into a potential stress biomarker in teleost larvae, i.e. microRNA-29a. We focus on this regulation molecule because previous ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNAseq) data from our lab has shown a statistically significant modulation in this miRNA in 7-dpf larvae whose male progenitors had been exposed to chronic stress covering more than one spermatogenic wave in the zebrafish model (Riesco et al. 2023). Herein, we evaluate whether a direct exposure to a battery of successive acute stressors during the first stages of development (1–6 dpf) also modulates the expression of this miRNA. Stress exposure in early stages may be especially relevant, since this represents a crucial phase in ensuring a future successful fish culture. Avoiding stress sources in larvae can be beneficial in ensuring the health of adult fish and adequate reproductive performance in future breeders. Larvae may be exposed to several possible stress sources and to important physiological changes (Pederzoli and Mola 2016), hence the importance of studying stress consequences in these stages. To induce stress in larvae, we selected a set of acute stressors previously published to rise cortisol levels in zebrafish larvae ((Yeh et al. 2013; Bai et al. 2016); Fig. 1A). Zebrafish larvae are excellent teleost models for testing external stimuli given their characteristics (Horzmann and Freeman 2018; Busse et al. 2020) and the ease to perform this kind of trials by manipulating the embryo’s incubation media. The chosen temporal frame to apply the acute stressors (1–6 dpf) was established as the range of time during which the animal cannot feed autonomously, and therefore, survival of larvae is mainly affected by environmental conditions, their genetic background and the quality of the reserves of their yolk sac. As expected, exposure to stressors during this sensitive developmental period affected key parameters in the progenies. Although not drastically, survival curve comparison was revealed to be different between groups (Fig. 1B). These results are logical, since the stressors used in this work were only induced for very short periods of time (5–10 min) and were not lethal for most of the specimens. The absence of high mortality rates can be advantageous in highlighting molecular and phenotypic alterations that might otherwise be masked by lethality. These rates also validate our experimental design, allowing for the comparison of our approach in the laboratory with the conditions in aquaculture facilities, where individuals are theoretically protected from constant aggressive stressors, such as heavy metals that cause high mortality rates by being present either as a pulse or in a constant manner in the environment (Chen et al. 2019). We also evaluated the hatching rate at 72 hpf and the malformation rate at 5 dpf, the moment in which major morphogenesis are completed in Danio rerio (Chu and Sadler 2009). Studying the hatching rate is crucial in aquaculture-focused studies since shorter hatching times mean cost savings and higher efficacy for fish farmers, and hatching success is a key indicator of correct development in an artificial environment (Watson and Chapman 1996). In the present work, hatching rate was not affected by the stress protocol (Fig. 1C). Note that, at 72 hpf, the survival curve of stressed individuals drops compared with that of the controls. This pattern in the survival curves could contribute to the results obtained for the hatching rate. Contrary to hatching rate results, the malformation rate showed a statistically significant difference between routinely cultured and stressed larvae (Fig. 1D). In teleost, malformations appear early in development, and these are frequent in reared larvae. The malformation rate is generally assumed in the aquaculture facilities as an indicator reflecting culture conditions (Chandra et al. 2024). The importance of the malformation rate in the industry is based on the driven decreased growth rate, increased mortality, increased production costs and eventually decreased market price. The stress induction in our experiment led to a malformation rate around 20% (Fig. 1D). The malformed 5-dpf larvae presented a combination of deformities, including a pericardial oedema, uninflated swim bladder, incorrect jaw elongation, inappropriate yolk sac resorption and non-canonical otolith development (Fig. 1E). These are typical malformations found in zebrafish under jeopardising culture conditions (Xu et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023; Yuan et al. 2023). Since our main goal in this work is to integrate the observation of phenotypic alterations derived from stress with potential deregulations of regulatory molecules, we studied the expression of miR-29a in the larvae at the end of the experiment. Besides our previous studies indicating a link between stress and this miRNA (Riesco et al. 2023), other groups have previously suggested a relation between miR-29a expression pattern and stressful conditions. In humans, this miR has been proposed as a neuroendocrine stress response marker (Liang et al. 2018) showing overexpression in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Also, an external stressful stimulus (chronic academic stress) promoted its overexpression (Honda et al. 2013). Cell culture-focused studies have also related miR-29a overexpression with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced apoptosis (Nolan et al. 2016). Moreover, accumulating evidence correlates the regulatory role of miR-29a in different cancer types (Wu et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2022) and other pathologies, such as pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic fibrosis and aneurysm by targeting extracellular matrix molecules (Matsumoto et al. 2016; Smyth et al. 2022). miR-29a overexpression registered here (Fig. 2A) is in accordance to these previous results linking this non-coding RNA with a stressful environment for the organism. Thus, the higher ratio of malformations registered at 5 dpf in the stressed group (S+) may be partially explained by the overexpression of this miRNA, since the gene ontology exploration of its targeted mRNAs (Fig. 2B) globally suggested biological process entries related to development (embryo, anatomical, organ, nervous system, systems). Considering the phenotypes registered in the malformed larvae in the stressed group, we focused on three features: behaviour, reduction of eye size (microphthalmia) and reduction of jaw elongation (micrognathia). These foci of attention were also selected because these are crucial also from the aquaculture industry perspective. Aberrant behaviours are clear indicators of non-optimal husbandry conditions (Ingebretson and Masino 2013). Although in the present study it was not studied in detail whether the individuals in the stressed group are blind, based on the phenotype found, it is reasonable to think that the vision of the individuals is compromised. Blindness occurrence can lead to a harmful scenario impairing larvae to see feed and, consequently, promoting eating reduction and growing slowdown. Indeed, blindness issues and derived economical losses are increasingly attracting the interest of the aquaculture scientific community (Remø et al. 2011; Jonassen et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2023). Finally, skeletal deformities are found at a high incidence in fish hatcheries and lead to economical loss as these make fish unappealing (Eissa et al. 2021).
Regarding behaviour analysis, we found that the number of live larvae showing immobility in the culture plate was significantly higher in the stressed group (Fig. 3A). These data are in line with the results of previous studies in which exposure to ethanol increased the percentage of non-motile individuals in 7-dpf larvae (Ingebretson and Masino 2013). Presumably, these immobile larvae accumulate serious systemic alterations, promoting their paralysis. However, among larvae able to move, we found no alteration on the swimming pattern (Fig. 3D), contrary to other chronic stress-focused experiments where different patterns were reported between control and disturbed larvae (Levin et al. 2004). These results indicate that the impact of stress on behaviour could resemble a binary response.
Regarding eye development in zebrafish, similar alterations to the ones registered in the present work (Fig. 4A–D) have been previously reported in studies focused on stress evaluation (Sherpa et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2021; Lee et al. 2023). miR-29a overexpression has been correlated to myopia (Zhu et al. 2022) and has been suggested to play a crucial role regulating ocular vasculopathy (Peng et al. 2022). Moreover, miR-29a targets some crucial mRNAs linked to RA, a potent morphogen essential for embryonic development, which participates in eye development and is critical for normal optic vesicle and anterior segment formation (Thompson et al. 2019). Thus, the deregulation in RA-signalling can result in severe ocular developmental diseases. Our qPCR results showed only a non-statistically significant trend in the expression of the studied RA receptors targeted by miR-29a: rarga, rxrba and rxrbb (Fig. 4E).
Regarding the registered malformations related to jaw elongation (micrognathia) and cranial skeleton development, we decided to further explore cartilage tissue in the larvae. Alcian blue staining revealed cranial skeleton to be severely affected by stress induction in the malformed larvae (Fig. 5A, B). Similar alterations in cranial encephalic cartilage development have been previously reported in zebrafish larvae exposed to different stressors, such as thermal stress (Long et al. 2012) or pollutants (Staal et al. 2018). Our analyses revealed shorter lower jaws and heads and wider M-PQ angles in the chronically stressed larvae. In ecotoxicology and drug testing experiments, the M-PQ angle has been proposed as a reliable high-throughput standard parameter to assess craniofacial outcomes after single or mixed compound exposures (Raterman et al. 2020) since this is especially affected in craniofacial malformations, such as microcephaly and micrognathia. Since collagen is a major extracellular matrix (ECM) protein forming a microfibrillar network in many tissues, including skeletal muscle, cartilage, tendon, nervous system, eye or heart, among others (Ferreira et al. 2012; Sprangers and Everts 2019; Zhao et al. 2021), we selected five miR-29a-targeted collagen genes to study gene expression in our experimental groups. miR-29a targets more than 25 collagen transcripts (Additional file 3: Table S2). The selected transcripts in the present work have been previously reported to play key roles in zebrafish larvae cranioencephalic cartilages development: col2a1a, col2a1b, col6a2, col6a3 and col11a1a (Dale and Topczewski 2011; Tonelotto et al. 2019; Hardy et al. 2020; Reeck and Oxford 2022). Given that we found miR-29a overexpression in the stressed larvae, we expected to find a downregulation in these candidate transcripts. Globally, the results supported this hypothesis (Fig. 5E), reporting a downregulation trend in all studied collagen genes. Three of the genes showed statistically significant differences: col2a1a, col6a2 and col11a1, corroborating the impact of exposure to successive stressors on larvae cartilage development.
Conclusion
Our results show that the culture protocol used to induce stress in early developmental stages in zebrafish subtly affected survival percentages and did not affect hatching rates, but significantly increased malformation rates, in particular those related to cranioencephalic malformations (shorter lower jaw length, shorter head and wider M-PQ angle). Behaviour analyses demonstrated that the percentage of immobile larvae statistically significantly increased in the stressed group; interestingly, mobile larvae from both experimental groups showed similar swimming patterns. These reported physiological alterations correlated to miR-29a overexpression in stressed individuals and downregulation of essential collagen transcripts related cranioencephalic cartilage development. This study contributes to a better understanding of the effects of stressful culture conditions in early developmental stages in teleost, a crucial issue for the aquaculture industry which indicates miR-29a to be a potential molecular marker to test new larvae culture programmes in teleost species.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and its additional files.
Abbreviations
- cDNA:
-
Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- dpf:
-
Days post-fertilisation
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- EM:
-
Embryo medium
- ER:
-
Endoplasmic reticulum
- GO:
-
Gene ontology
- HKG:
-
Housekeeping gene
- hpf:
-
Hours post-fertilisation
- H&E:
-
Haematoxylin and eosin stain
- M1:
-
Major axis of the virtual ellipse generated from the eye area
- M2:
-
Minor axis of the virtual ellipse generated from the eye area
- miRNA :
-
Micro-ribonucleic acid
- M-PQ:
-
Meckel’s–palatoquadrate
- mRNA:
-
Messenger ribonucleic acid
- NTT:
-
Novel tank test
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- qPCR:
-
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- RA:
-
Retinoic acid
- RARs:
-
Retinoic acid receptors
- RNA:
-
Ribonucleic acid
- RNAseq:
-
Ribonucleic acid sequencing
- S− :
-
Stressed samples
- S+ :
-
Control samples
References
Abdel-Tawwab M, Monier MN, Hoseinifar SH, Faggio C (2019) Fish response to hypoxia stress: growth, physiological, and immunological biomarkers. Fish Physiol Biochem 45:997–1013
Abe FR, Accoroni KAG, Gravato C, de Oliveira DP (2021) Early life stage assays in zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol 2240:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1091-6_7
Aerts J, Metz JR, Ampe B, et al (2015) Scales tell a story on the stress history of fish. PLoS One 10:. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123411
Amar A, Ramachandran B (2023) Environmental stressors differentially modulate anxiety-like behaviour in male and female zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 450:114470. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBR.2023.114470
Ambros V (2004) The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 431:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/NATURE02871
Aranda-martínez P, Fernández-martínez J, Ramírez-casas Y, Aranda-Martínez P, Fernández-Martínez J, Ramírez-Casas Y, Guerra-Librero A, Rodríguez-Santana C, EscamesG Acuña-Castroviejo D (2022) The Zebrafish, an outstanding model for biomedical research in the field of melatonin and human diseases. Int J Mol Sci 23(13):7438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137438
Bai Y, Liu H, Huang B, Wagle M, Guo S (2016) Identification of environmental stressors and validation of light preferenceas a measure of anxiety in larval zebrafish. BMC Neurosci. 17(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0298-z
Bhagat J, Zang L, Nishimura N, Zebrafish Shimada Y (2020) An emerging model to study microplastic and nanoplastictoxicity. Sci Total Environ 728:138707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138707
Braithwaite VA, Ebbesson LO (2014) Pain and stress responses in farmed fish. Rev Sci Tech. 33(1):245–53. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2285
Busse B, Galloway JL, Gray RS et al (2020) Zebrafish: an emerging model for orthopedic research. J Orthop Res 38:925–936
Campbell JH, Dixon B, Whitehouse LM (2021) The intersection of stress, sex and immunity in fishes. Immunogenetics 73:111–129
Canzian J, Franscescon F, Müller TE, Stefanello FV, Souza TP, Rosa LV, Rosemberg DB (2021) Stress increases susceptibility to pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in adult zebrafish. Epilepsy Behav 114(Pt A):107557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107557
Chandra G, Saini VP, Kumar S, Fopp-Bayat D (2024) Deformities in fish: a barrier for responsible aquaculture and sustainable fisheries. Rev Aquac 16:872–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/RAQ.12872
Chen M, Gao Y, Bian X et al (2019) Predicting the survival of zebrafish larvae exposed to fluctuating pulses of lead and cadmium. Chemosphere 223:599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.102
Cheng KC, Hsu YT, Liu W et al (2021) The role of oxidative stress and autophagy in blue-light-induced damage to the retinal pigment epithelium in zebrafish in vitro and in vivo. Int J Mol Sci 22:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031338
Choi TY, Choi TI, Lee YR et al (2021) Zebrafish as an animal model for biomedical research. Exp Mol Med 53:310–317
Chu J, Sadler KC (2009) New school in liver development: lessons from zebrafish. Hepatology 50:1656–1663
Chuan-hao L, Wei C, Jia-qing H et al (2016) miRNA-29a targets COL3A1 to regulate the level of type III collagen in pig. Gene 592:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GENE.2016.07.068
Dahm R, Geisler R (2006) Learning from small fry: the zebrafish as a genetic model organism for aquaculture fish species. Mar Biotechnol 8:329–345
Dai YJ, Jia YF, Chen N et al (2014) Zebrafish as a model system to study toxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:11–17
Dale RM, Topczewski J (2011) Identification of an evolutionarily conserved regulatory element of the zebrafish col2a1a gene. Dev Biol 357:518–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YDBIO.2011.06.020
Demin KA, Taranov AS, Ilyin NP et al (2021) Understanding neurobehavioral effects of acute and chronic stress in zebrafish. Stress 24:1–18
Divisato G, Formicola D, Esposito T et al (2016) ZNF687 mutations in severe Paget disease of bone associated with giant cell tumor. Am J Hum Genet 98:275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJHG.2015.12.016
Duester G (2008) Retinoic acid synthesis and signaling during early organogenesis. Cell 134:921–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2008.09.002
Eissa AE, Abu-Seida AM, Ismail MM et al (2021) A comprehensive overview of the most common skeletal deformities in fish. Aquac Res 52:2391–2402. https://doi.org/10.1111/ARE.15125
European Commission (2021) EUR-Lex - 52021DC0236 - EN - EUR-Lex. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Strategic guidelines for a more sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture for the period 2021 to 2030. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0236
Fan X, Hou T, Sun T, Zhu L, Zhang S, Tang K, Wang Z (2019) Starvation stress affects the maternal development andlarval fitness in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci Total Environ 695:133897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133897
Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G (2012) Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 8:3191–3200
Garcia-Concejo A, Jimenez-Gonzalez A, Rodriguez RE (2018) Opioid and Notch signaling pathways are reciprocally regulated through miR-29a and miR-212 expression. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Gen Subj 1862:2605–2612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBAGEN.2018.07.001
Gauthier PT, Vijayan MM (2020) Municipal wastewater effluent exposure disrupts early development, larval behavior, and stress response in zebrafish. Environ Pollut 259:113757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113757
Ghisleni G, Capiotti KM, Da Silva RS et al (2012) The role of CRH in behavioral responses to acute restraint stress in zebrafish. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 36:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.08.016
Hardy MJ, Reeck JC, Fang M, Adams JS, Oxford JT (2020) Col11a1a expression is required for zebrafish development. J Dev Biol 8(3):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/JDB8030016
Heinkele FJ, Lou B, Erben V, Bennewitz K, Poschet G, Sticht C, Kroll J (2021) Metabolic and transcriptional adaptations improve physical performance of zebrafish. Antioxidants (Basel) 10(10):1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10101581
Hogg DR, Harries LW (2014) Human genetic variation and its effect on miRNA biogenesis, activity and function. BiochemSoc Trans 42(4):1184–9. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20140055
Honda M, Kuwano Y, Katsuura-Kamano S et al (2013) Chronic academic stress increases a group of microRNAs in peripheral blood. PLoS ONE 8:75960. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0075960
Horita M, Farquharson C, Stephen LA (2021) The role of miR-29 family in disease. J Cell Biochem 122:696–715
Horzmann KA, Freeman JL (2018) Making waves: new developments in toxicology with the zebrafish. Toxicol Sci 163:5–12
Huang D, Xue H, Shao W et al (2022) Inhibiting effect of miR-29 on proliferation and migration of uterine leiomyoma via the STAT3 signaling pathway. Aging 14:1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.18632/AGING.203873
Ingebretson JJ, Masino MA (2013) Quantification of locomotor activity in larval Zebrafish: considerations for the design of high-throughput behavioral studies. Front Neural Circuits 7:47539. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNCIR.2013.00109/BIBTEX
Jonassen T, Hamadi M, Remø SC, Waagbø R (2017) An epidemiological study of cataracts in wild and farmed lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus L.) and the relation to nutrition. J Fish Dis 40:1903–1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFD.12664
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR et al (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203:253–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1002030302
Lee H, An G, Park J, Lim W, Song G (2023) Molinate induces organ defects by promoting apoptosis, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress during the developmental stage of zebrafish. Sci Total Environ 885:163768. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.163768
Levin ED, Swain HA, Donerly S, Linney E (2004) Developmental chlorpyrifos effects on hatchling zebrafish swimming behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 26(6):719–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2004.06.013
Liang YZ, Dong J, Zhang J et al (2018) Identification of neuroendocrine stress response-related circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance. Front Endocrinol (lausanne) 9:322266. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENDO.2018.00132/BIBTEX
Liu X, Zhou L, Li W et al (2023) Gata2a mutation causes progressive microphthalmia and blindness in Nile Tilapia. Int J Mol Sci 24:3567. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS24043567/S1
Long Y, Li L, Li Q, He X, Cui Z (2012) Transcriptomic characterization of temperature stress responses in larval zebrafish. PLoS One 7(5):e37209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037209
López-Olmeda JF, Noble C, Sánchez-Vázquez FJ (2012) Does feeding time affect fish welfare? Fish Physiol Biochem 38:143–152
Maffioletti E, Bocchio-Chiavetto L, Perusi G, Carvalho Silva R, Sacco C, Bazzanella R, Zampieri E, Bortolomasi M, Gennarelli M, Minelli A (2021) Inflammation-related microRNAs are involved in stressful life events exposure and in trauma-focused psychotherapy in treatment-resistant depressed patients. Eur J Psychotraumatol 12(1):1987655. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1987655
Matsumoto Y, Itami S, Kuroda M et al (2016) MiR-29a assists in preventing the activation of human stellate cells and promotes recovery from liver fibrosis in mice. Mol Ther 24:1848–1859. https://doi.org/10.1038/MT.2016.127
Nanda D, Chandrasekaran SP, Ramachandran V et al (2020) Evaluation of serum miRNA-24, miRNA-29a and miRNA-502-3p expression in PCOS subjects: correlation with biochemical parameters related to PCOS and insulin resistance. Indian J Clin Biochem 35:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-018-0808-0
Noble S, Saxena V, Ekker M, Devlin R (2017) Expression of thiaminase in zebrafish (Danio rerio) is lethal and has implications for use as a biocontainment strategy in aquaculture and invasive species. Mar Biotechnol 19:563–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-017-9776-2
Nolan K, Walter F, Tuffy LP et al (2016) Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated upregulation of miR-29a enhances sensitivity to neuronal apoptosis. Eur J Neurosci 43:640–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/EJN.13160
Pederzoli A, Mola L (2016) The early stress responses in fish larvae. Acta Histochem 118:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTHIS.2016.03.001
Peng DW, Lan CL, Dong LQ et al (2022) Anti-angiogenic properties of microRNA-29a in preclinical ocular models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119:e2204795119. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2204795119/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.2204795119.SAPP.PDF
Petersen BD, Pereira TCB, Altenhofen S, Altenhofen S, Nabinger DD, Ferreira PMA, Bogo MR, Bonan CD (2021) Antibiotic drugs alter zebrafish behavior. Comp Biochem Physiol Part - C: Toxicol Pharmacol 242:108936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2020.108936
Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47
Porto VA, da Rocha Júnior ER, Ursulino JS, Porto RS, da Silva M, de Jesus LWO, Oliveira JM, Crispim AC, Santos JCC, Aquino TM (2023) NMR-based metabolomics applied to ecotoxicology with zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a prominent model for metabolic profiling and biomarker discovery: overviewing the most recent approaches. Sci Total Environ 868:161737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161737
Raterman ST, Metz JR, Wagener FADTG, Von den Hoff JW (2020) Zebrafish models of craniofacial malformations: interactions of environmental factors. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:600926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.600926
Reeck JC, Oxford JT (2022) The shape of the jaw—zebrafish Col11a1a regulates Meckel’s cartilage morphogenesis and mineralization. J Dev Biol 10:40. https://doi.org/10.3390/JDB10040040
Remø SC, Olsvik PA, Torstensen BE et al (2011) Susceptibility of Atlantic salmon lenses to hydrogen peroxide oxidation ex vivo after being fed diets with vegetable oil and methylmercury. Exp Eye Res 92:414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXER.2011.02.018
Riesco MF, Valcarce DG, Alfonso J et al (2014) In vitro generation of zebrafish PGC-like cells. Biol Reprod 91:114. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.121491
Riesco MF, Valcarce DG, Martínez-Vázquez JM, Robles V (2019) Effect of low sperm quality on progeny: a study on zebrafish as model species. Sci Rep 9:11192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47702-7
Riesco MF, Valcarce DG, Sellés-Egea A et al (2023) miR-29a is downregulated in progenies derived from chronically stressed males. Int J Mol Sci 24:14107. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS241814107
Rosa JGS, Lima C, Lopes-Ferreira M (2022) Zebrafish larvae behavior models as a tool for drug screenings and pre-clinical trials: a review. Int J Mol Sci 23(12):6647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126647
Sánchez-Vázquez FJ, López-Olmeda JF, Vera LM, Migaud H, López-Patiño MA, Míguez JM (2019) Environmental cycles, melatonin, and circadian control of stress response in fish. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10:279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00279
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
Schnörr SJ, Steenbergen PJ, Richardson MK, Champagne DL (2012) Measuring thigmotaxis in larval zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 228:367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBR.2011.12.016
Sherpa T, Hunter SS, Frey RA et al (2011) Retinal proliferation response in the buphthalmic zebrafish, bugeye. Exp Eye Res 93:424–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.06.001
Shi X, Valizadeh A, Mir SM, Asemi Z, Karimian A, Majidina M, Safa A, Yosefi B (2020) miRNA-29a reverses P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance and inhibits proliferation via up-regulation of PTEN in colon cancer cells. Eur J Pharmacol 880:173138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173138
Singleman C, Holtzman NG (2014) Growth and maturation in the zebrafish, Danio Rerio: a staging tool for teaching and research. Zebrafish 11:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2014.0976
Smyth A, Callaghan B, Willoughby CE, O’Brien C (2022) The role of miR-29 family in TGF-β driven fibrosis in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Int J Mol Sci 23(18):10216. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS231810216
Sprangers S, Everts V (2019) Molecular pathways of cell-mediated degradation of fibrillar collagen. Matrix Biol 75–76:190–200
Staal YCM, Meijer J, van der Kris RJC et al (2018) Head skeleton malformations in zebrafish (Danio rerio) to assess adverse effects of mixtures of compounds. Arch Toxicol 92:3549–3564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2320-y
Swaminathan A, Gliksberg M, Anbalagan S et al (2023) Stress resilience is established during development and is regulated by complement factors. Cell Rep 42:111973. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELREP.2022.111973
Tang R, Dodd A, Lai D et al (2007) Validation of zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>) reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR normalization. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (shanghai) 39:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-7270.2007.00283.X
Teng M, Wang C, Song M, Chen X, Zhang J, Wang C (2020) Chronic exposure of zebrafish (Danio rerio) to flutolanil leads to endocrine disruption and reproductive disorders. Environ Res 184:109310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109310
Thompson B, Katsanis N, Apostolopoulos N, Thompson DC, Nebert DW, Vasiliou V (2019) Genetics and functions of the retinoic acid pathway, with special emphasis on the eye. Hum Genomics 13(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40246-019-0248-9
Thomson JS, Deakin AG, Cossins AR, et al (2020) Acute and chronic stress prevents responses to pain in zebrafish: evidence for stress-induced analgesia. J Exp Biol 223:. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.224527
Tonelotto V, Trapani V, Bretaud S et al (2019) Spatio-temporal expression and distribution of collagen VI during zebrafish development. Sci Rep 9(1):19851. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-019-56445-4
Valcarce DG, Vuelta E, Robles V, Herráez MP (2017) Paternal exposure to environmental 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol concentrations modifies testicular transcription, affecting the sperm transcript content and the offspring performance in zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol 193:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.09.025
Valcarce DG, Riesco MF, Cuesta-Martín L et al (2023a) Stress decreases spermatozoa quality and induces molecular alterations in zebrafish progeny. BMC Biol 21:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01570-w
Valcarce DG, Riesco MF, Martínez-Vázquez JM et al (2023b) Impact of different levels of handling on Solea senegalensis culture: effects on growth and molecular markers of stress. Fish Physiol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10695-023-01239-9
Watson CA, Chapman FA (1996) Artificial Incubation of Fish Eggs (Fact Sheet FA-32). 1996. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/DLN
Wu Y, Shi W, Tang T, Wang Y, Yin X, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Xing Y, Shen Y, Xia T, Guo C, Pan Y, Jin L (2019) miR-29a contributes to breast cancer cells epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion via down-regulating histone H4K20 trimethylation through directly targeting SUV420H2. Cell Death Dis 10(11):856. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41419-019-1437-0
Xu R, Huang Y, Lu C, Lv W, Hong S, Zeng S, Xia W, Guo L, Lu H, Chen Y (2022) Ticlopidine induces cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos through AHR-mediated oxidative stress signaling pathway. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 230:113138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113138
Yaribeygi H, Panahi Y, Sahraei H et al (2017) The impact of stress on body function: a review. EXCLI J 16:1057–1072
Yeh CM, Glöck M, Ryu S (2013) An optimized whole-body cortisol quantification method for assessing stress levels in larval zebrafish. PLoS One 8:. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079406
Yuan W, Hu Y, Lu C, Zhang J, Liu Y, Li X, Jia K, Huang Y, Li Z, Chen X, Wang F, Yi X, Che X, Xiong H, Cheng B, Ma J, Zhao Y, Lu H (2023) Propineb induced notochord deformity, craniofacial malformation, and osteoporosis in zebrafish through dysregulated reactive oxygen species generation. Aquatic Toxicol 261:106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106596
Zhang SY, Lei Y, Liang Q, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Gan X, Bai C, Chen J (2023) Cold stress during the perinatal period leads to developmental and neurobehavioral toxicity in zebrafish larvae. Neurotoxicol Teratol 96:107164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2023.107164
Zhao C, Xiao Y, Ling S, Pei Y, Ren J (2021) Structure of collagen. Methods Mol Biol 2347:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1574-4_2
Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Jiang R et al (2022) MicroRNA-29a may influence myopia development by regulating collagen I. Curr Eye Res 47:468–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2021.1998542
Acknowledgements
We thank the facilities and technical staff from the University of León involved in this work.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This study was supported by MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033, grant PID2019-108509RB-I00. DGV was funded by MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033, grant IJC2020-044091-I, and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VR conceived and designed the study, obtained financial support, analysed data and drafted the manuscript. DGV, MFR and MPH contributed to the design, optimised and performed experiments, analysed data and drafted the manuscript. ASE collected and processed the samples and performed experiments. MGG and BMF performed histological studies. All authors discussed the results and interpretation and read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All experimental procedures were conducted with the approval of the University of León Bioethical Committee (Project License number: 70/6693) and the competent body of Junta de Castilla y León (Project License number: ULE009-2020) and conformed to the Guidelines of the European Union Council and Spanish regulations for the use of laboratory animals.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file2 (MP4 14562 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Valcarce, D.G., Sellés-Egea, A., Riesco, M.F. et al. Early stress exposure on zebrafish development: effects on survival, malformations and molecular alterations. Fish Physiol Biochem 50, 1545–1562 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-024-01355-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-024-01355-0