Abstract
The soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a viral pathogen caused by Potyvirus reported in the major soybean growing areas of the world. SMV strain SC-15 is the most virulent and predominant strain that infects all soybean differentials and is widely distributed throughout southern China. In this study, three elite SMV-resistant soybean varieties that possess better comprehensive traits were identified through a screening test. A mapping population containing 163 F8 recombinant inbred lines derived from a Zhonghuang24 (resistant) × Huaxia3 (susceptible) cross was used to locate the resistance gene for SMV strain SC-15. A high-density genetic linkage map was developed containing 2639 recombination bins using the restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) method. Results revealed a novel resistance gene, RSC15ZH identified in a 63 kb region of chromosome 13. This locus was further characterized by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Four candidate resistance genes were identified that were possibly involved in regulating SMV resistance, especially Glyma13g24461. These results provide a basic foundation for soybean breeding programs to improve resistance to SMV strain SC-15 and for positional cloning of SMV resistant candidate genes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a major viral pathogen caused by Potyvirus reported in soybean production sites worldwide (Zhang et al. 2012). SMV can infect plants during all growth stages, resulting in yield loss and a reduction in seed quality (Sun et al. 2007). Numerous SMV strains have been classified into different groups. In the United States, 98 isolates of SMV were grouped into seven strains (G1 to G7), with several new strains identified since then (Cho and Goodman 1979, 1982). In Japan, Takahashi et al. classified SMV isolates from four soybean varieties into five strain groups (A–E) (Kato et al. 2016). In China, 22 strains (SC-1 to SC-22) were grouped using reaction to infection to a set of soybean differentials (Guo et al. 2005; Zhan et al. 2006; Li et al. 2010a, b; Wang et al. 2013, 2018). Among them, SC-15 was the most virulent and predominant strain infecting all soybean differentials and is currently widely distributed throughout soybean producing areas of China, especially southern China (Li et al. 2010a, b).
Utilization of soybean accessions resistant to SMV is an economical and environmentally safe way to control infection. Breeding for resistance to SMV using molecular marker-assisted selection is a more efficient approach than traditional methods for selecting resistant varieties. Recently, genetic maps with molecular markers, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and simple sequence repeats (SSRs), have been used to identify the genetic basis for SMV resistance in soybeans. Thus far, three independent resistance genes, Rsv1, Rsv3, and Rsv4 were identified and located on chromosomes 13, 14, and 2, respectively (Yu et al. 1994; Hayes et al. 2000; Jeong et al. 2002; Fu et al. 2006). Rsv1 in PI96983 is resistant to six virulent strains (G1–G6). It was first mapped on soybean chromosome 13 and was considered to be a complex locus within a multigene cluster (Shi et al. 2008). In China, some studies used molecular markers to map SMV-resistant genes, which were mainly concentrated on chromosomes 2 and 13 (Wang et al. 2004; Li et al. 2006a, b; Ma et al. 2010, 2011; Yang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2011a, b; Zheng et al. 2014; Yan et al. 2015; Li et al. 2015). Many SMV-resistant genes identified in China were located in close proximity to the Rsv genes identified in the United States. For instance, Yang et al. (2011) identified two resistant genes. One gene flanked Rsv1 and elicits resistance for SMV strains SC-3, SC-6, and SC-17, while the other confers resistance for strain SC-7 only. It seems that the SMV resistance region contains a gene that is specific to one SMV strain. Therefore, the relationship between Rsc and Rsv genes should be further investigated. Additionally, RSC-15 is located on chromosome 6 with the genomic markers, SSR_06_17 and BARCSOYSSR_06_0835, flanking this resistance gene (Yang and Gai 2011; Rui et al. 2017). RSC-4 is located on chromosome 14 between SSR markers, BARCSOYSSR_14_1413 and BARCSOYSSR_14_1416 identified using an F2:3 population derived from ‘Dabaima’ × ‘Nannong1138-2’ (Wang et al. 2011a).
The objectives of this study were to (1) screen elite resistant soybean varieties for SMV strain SC-15, (2) locate the resistance gene, RSC15ZH, in a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between Zhonghuang24 (resistant parent) × Huaxia3 (susceptible parent), and (3) identify candidate genes in the target region using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis.
Materials and methods
SMV strain and plant materials
SMV strain SC-15 and susceptible soybean cultivar, Nannong1138-2, provided by the National Center for Soybean Improvement, Nanjing Agricultural University, China were used in this study. Nineteen soybean cultivars, that included 11 cultivars, three introduced cultivars, three mutant cultivars, one landrace cultivar, and one edamame cultivar, were collected from China and Brazil, and screened for SC-15 resistance. Most cultivars were obtained from southern China because SC-15 is common in this region. An RIL population of 163 F8 lines from the cross Zhonghuang24 × Huaxia3 (Liu et al. 2017) and developed using a single seed descent method (Yue et al. 2017) was used to map resistance genes to SMV strain SC-15.
Inoculation and resistance/susceptible evaluation
Strain SC-15 was cultivated from the susceptible cultivar, Nannong1138-2. Nineteen soybean cultivars and an RIL population were grown in pots and filled with vermiculite and soil in an aphid-free greenhouse. Ten to 12 plants were grown in each pot. Using mechanical inoculation, plants were inoculated when the pair of unifoliolate leaves had unfolded, then inoculated again when the first trifoliate leaves had unfolded (Yan et al. 2015). The reaction of each genotype to SC-15 was determined 4 weeks post-inoculation (Karthikeyan et al. 2018). Based on their reactions to SMV, the plants of each genotype were divided into symptomless (resistant) and mosaic (susceptible) groups when the disease reaction on leaves appeared to be stable.
SNP genotyping and resistance gene detection
Zhonghuang24 is resistant to SMV strain SC-15, whereas Huaxia3 is susceptible to the strain. To fine-map the resistance gene, an RIL population containing 163 individuals was generated by crossing resistant parent Zhonghuang24 with SMV-susceptible variety Huaxia3. All genotyping work was conducted following the methods previously described by Liu et al. (2017). A soybean reference genome, G. max Wm82.a1, was used to compare sequencing reads of each individual plant using SOAP software (Li et al. 2009a, b). The input file for realSFS was prepared using SAMtools (Li et al. 2009a, b). The information for each site was performed with realSFS to obtain the genotype of every individual, using Zhonghuang24 and Huaxia3 soybeans as references. Then, the exchange sites for each individual were identified to generate bin information. Finally, a linkage map was constructed using MapChart software (Voorrips 2002). The composite interval mapping (CIM) method was employed to scan bins with WinQTLCart software (Zeng 1993). The LOD threshold was calculated using 1000 replications with an experiment-wise error rate of p = 0.05 to determine whether there were any bins linked to a resistance gene.
qRT-PCR analysis
Three plants were mock-inoculated with sodium phosphate buffer, and leaf samples of Zhonghuang24 and Huaxia3 infected by SC-15 were independently collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the initial inoculation. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for future analysis.
RNA was extracted from samples using the TransZolTm Up (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, P.R.C.) method. cDNA synthesis was performed by using TransScrip II One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, P.R.C.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). All reactions were conducted in 10-µl volumes consisting of 1.0 µl of cDNA as a template. qRT-PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 5 s, then 55 °C for 15 s. Primers of each candidate gene for qRT-PCR analysis were designed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The actin gene of soybean was used as an internal control to normalize each sample. Each PCR assay was replicated three times. The relative expression level of target genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).
Results
Screening for resistance lines
Nineteen soybean cultivars were evaluated and results indicated that three cultivars were highly resistant to strain SC-15. These included the two cultivars, Huachun5 and Zhonghuang24 and cultivar BRS135 introduced from Brazil (Table 1). Zhonghuang24 is a high-yielding, high-oil cultivar that has adapted to the Huang-Huai-Hai Valleys in China. Huachun5 was derived from a cross between Guizao1 × BRS135 and is a high-yielding, high-protein cultivar, which has shown high resistant to multiple diseases, such as Phytophthora sojae and SMV races. BRS135 is also a high-yielding cultivar that was introduced to China from Brazil. These SMV-resistant cultivars can be used for parental material for development of high-yielding, multi-disease resistant cultivars with possibly better overall seed quality.
Fine mapping of the SC15-resistance gene
The linkage map used in this study was constructed as previously described (Liu et al. 2017). In total, 47,472 SNPs were integrated into a recombination bin unit, or a high-density linkage map that spanned 2638.24 cM and contained 2639 recombination bins used to locate the target resistance gene (s) for SMV strain SC-15. Based on the genotypic and phenotypic data of the two parental lines and the 163 RIL population, SMV strain SC-15 (designated as RSC15ZH) was amplified at the site of bin75 on chromosome 13 using the composite interval mapping method (CIM). This site was located in a physical interval of more than 60 kb with 27,801,314–27,864,011 bp through 12 recombinants: line40, line92, line201, line206, line211, line55, line12, line107, line99, line147, line252, and line264 (Fig. 1).
Possible resistance candidate genes and qRT-PCR analysis
The Glyma.Wm82.a1.v1.1 gene model from NCBI was used to retrieve gene calls and annotations. There were eight putative genes within the 63 kb target region. Among these genes, the function of Glyma13g24400 has not been characterized and the annotations of three genes, Glyma13g24410, -24420, and -24450, seem unassociated with plant disease resistance. The remaining four genes, Glyma13g24440, -24461, -24470, and -24490, were identified as candidate genes whose expression levels were evaluated by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2). Glyma13g24440 was significantly up-regulated after 1 h in Zhonghuang24, whereas the expression levels were only slightly up-regulated in Huaxia3 at the same point in time. Down-regulation of this gene was detected at 4 h in both parental lines. Glyma13g24470 exhibited similar trends across all time points in both parental lines. Expression levels were significantly up-regulated after 2 h, and the magnitude of expression in Zhonghuang24 was higher compared to Huaxia3. After this point in time, expression levels in both parental lines were significantly down-regulated at 4 h then significantly up-regulated at 12 h. Glyma13g24490 was significantly up-regulated after 1 h and 24 h in Zhonghuang24, while there was no significant change observed in Huaxia3 after the first 4 h; after this point in time, expression levels increased gradually. Glyma13g24461 exhibited its highest up-regulated expression levels after 1 h, but was significantly down-regulated at 4 h in Zhonghuang24. The relative expression levels in Huaxia3 appeared to be suppressed at all points in time. Thus, Glyma13g24461 is the most likely to be involved in response to SC-15 infection.
Discussion
SMV strain SC-15 is the most virulent Potyvirus strain that causes severe infection in soybeans throughout southern China. From the screening test, among the 19 identified soybean cultivars, 16 were highly susceptible, while three cultivars were asymptomatic. Three soybean accessions, Huaxia3, Huaxia5, and Guixiadou2, were developed from crossing Guizao1 × BRSMG68. These cultivars and their parents were highly susceptible to infection. Three elite cultivars, Huachun3, Huachun6, and Huaxia1, and their common parents, Guizao1 and MG/BR 46, inoculated with SC-15 were all susceptible. BRS135 and Huachun5 were resistant to SC-15. Use of SMV-resistant parents and selecting for SMV resistance should be an effective and economical method for controlling infection of this disease. The cultivars that exhibited dominant resistance to SC-15 can be used as resistance sources and could greatly assist research for exploiting elite cultivars with better agronomic traits, as well as SMV resistance.
The goal of this study was to locate the resistance gene for SMV strain SC-15. Most previous studies have reported mapping resistant SMV genes using RFLP, AFLP, and SSR markers, however, these methods did not have high enough efficiency to precisely detect genomic regions of resistance genes (Lee et al. 2015). SNP genotyping is a novel form of molecular technology that has been widely used for mapping resistance genes mapping due to their high-density and relatively even distribution throughout various genomes. In this study, the high-density genetic map of resistance genes for SMV was based on the RAD-seq method, and more than 47,000 SNPs were integrated into 2639 recombination bin units, suggesting that SNPs are more accurate for detecting resistance genes, and that reliable results can be obtained using this methodology.
Some studies have suggested that resistance genes are not randomly distributed throughout the entire genome, but generally exist as members of gene clusters in a certain linkage group or chromosome (Li et al. 2006a, b). Similarly, in this study, RSC15ZH was mapped to an interval of 27,801,314–27,864,011 bp on chromosome 13, located in a region that includes different SMV resistance genes (Table 2). For example, RSV1 was first identified in soybean line PI96983 as a single allele and was mapped on chromosome 13 (Yu et al. 1994). Li et al. (2006a, b) found that SMV strain SC-14 from Qihuang No.1 was also mapped on chromosome 13, and Ma et al. (2010) reported the resistance gene RSC-12 from Qihuang22 was also mapped on chromosome 13. Moreover, a series of SMV resistance genes, RN1, RN3, RSC-3, RSC-6, RSC-7, RSC-11, RSC-12, RSC-14, RSC-17, RSC-18, and RSC-20, have been mapped on chromosome 13 (Li et al. 2006a, b; Li et al. 2015; Ma et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2011; Karthikeyan et al. 2018). Several important molecular markers, including Sat_234, Sat_154, Satt334, and Sct_033, have been linked to these resistance genes. Therefore, it can be inferred that this region may not consist of a single resistant gene, but a cluster of SMV resistance genes. Previously, Yang et al. (2011) reported that the SC-15 resistance gene was located between Sat_213 and Sat_286 on chromosome 6 in a RIL population derived from RN-9 (R) × 7605 (S). Subsequently, Rui et al. (2017) used the same RIL population to narrow down this region, and Rsc15 was mapped to a 95 kb region on chromosome 6. Therefore, it is presumed that the same SMV strain in different resistant parents was inherited independently and exist on different chromosomes. A similar conclusion was confirmed by a previous study (Wang et al. 2018). Thus, in this study, the region of RSC15ZH can be considered a newly discovered resistance gene locus for the SMV strain SC-15.
Within the 63 kb region identified in this study, four candidate genes were selected for further analysis (Tables 3, 4). The Glyma13g24470 gene model encodes a highly conserved 76 amino acid protein ubiquitin that is covalently attached to substrate proteins that are targeted most for degradation. The ubiquitin/26S proteasome system (UPS) was one of the main protein degradation pathways found to play a critical role in plant–pathogen interactions. UPS is involved in almost every step of the defense mechanism process in plants, regardless of the type of pathogen (Dielen et al. 2010). In this study, the relative expression level of UPS was significantly up-regulated at 2 h in both parental lines; however, the magnitude of the expression level in the resistant parent was significantly higher compared to the susceptible parent. UPS was up-regulated again at 24 h at a high expression level in both parents. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that this gene participated in the biological processes of salicylic acid, which is an important endogenous signal molecule in the activation of plant defense responses (Zhang et al. 2001; Li et al. 2006a, b; Chaturvedi and Shah 2007). Despite these findings, the process of this gene’s involvement in response to SMV infection is complicated. Molecular mechanisms for plant disease resistance are complex and controlled by diverse and interrelated networks, and are not simple linear relationships.
Small heat shock proteins (sHSP) are widespread and found in all organisms. These stress proteins help protect plants from damage, or repair damage caused by a wide range of stressors, including heat, drought, and pathogens (Lu et al. 2003; Murakami et al. 2004). A dominant gene, RTM2, which has also been cloned (Whitham et al. 2000), encodes a sHSP that restricts long-distance virus movement by active mechanisms in Arabidopsis. In this study, three gene models (i.e., Glyma13g24440, -24461, and -24490) were found to encode a protein that is likely to be involved in defending against SMV. For instance, Glyma13g24440 and Glyma13g24461 were significantly up-regulated at 1 h in the resistant parent, but their relative expression levels in the susceptible parent were almost entirely suppressed at each point in time. Another gene model, Glyma13g24490, was up-regulated at 1 h and again 24 h with higher levels expressed in Zhonghuang24 compared to Huaxia3. Per the GO enrichment analysis, these three genes were related to the process of ‘response to oxidative stress or hydrogen peroxide’. Oxidative burst is one of the earliest responses identified in resistance to pathogen attack in plants (Li et al. 2006a, b). The accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) exists in multiple plant disease systems. Previous research has suggested that H2O2 could influence plant disease resistance responses in a number of ways, including (1) inhibiting and poisoning the pathogen directly, (2) inducing host membrane lipid peroxidation, leading to a hypersensitive response, and, (3) inducing the synthesis of phytoalexins (Li et al. 2006a, b). Moreover, a previous study demonstrated that H2O2 concentration is involved in SMV infection (Rui et al. 2017). The Glyma13g24461 gene is also presumed to participate in endoplasmic reticulum stress, which is a kind of subcellular pathological state associated with many diseases. Thus, these candidate genes, especially Glyma13g24461, may be correlated with activating plant signal pathways that regulate defense responses to SMV infection.
Nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR)-type genes have also been demonstrated to be involved in genetic disease resistance (Gore et al. 2002; Hayes et al. 2004). However, in this study, no NBS-LRR resistance genes were observed within the target region. Similar results have been previously reported for Rsv4, Rsc8, and Rsc15 (Hwang et al. 2006; Maroof et al. 2010; Ilut et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2016; Rui et al. 2017). The newly identified and cloned resistance gene at the Rhg4 locus of soybean cyst nematode does not belong to the NBS-LRR family either, and exhibited a completely different plant resistance mechanism (Liu et al. 2012). Thus, the SMV strain SC-15 resistance locus likely belongs to a new class of resistance genes, and its role in the underlying molecular mechanism of soybean SMV resistance requires further functional investigation.
Conclusions
Three elite SMV-resistant varieties to strain SC-15 were identified from 19 soybean cultivars in this study. The whole soybean genome was resequenced in order to exploit the bins associated with SC-15 resistance using a population consisting of 163 RILs from the cross Zhonghuang24 (resistant) × Huaxia3 (susceptible). A novel resistance gene, RSC15ZH, was located within a 63 kb region that fell within a hotspot of resistance genes on chromosome 13, and this locus for SC-15 was identified using different populations and methods compared to earlier reports. Moreover, four candidate resistance genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR, among which, Glyma13g24461 was the gene most likely to be involved in defending against SMV. These results will provide a foundation for cloning genes and confirming molecular resistance mechanisms in future studies.
References
Chaturvedi R, Shah J (2007) Salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Salicylic Acid A Plant Horm. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5184-0_12
Cho EK, Goodman RM (1979) Strains of soybean mosaic virus: classification based on virulence in resistant soybean cultivars. Phytopathology 69(5):467–470. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-69-467
Cho EK, Goodman RM (1982) Evaluation of resistance in soybeans to soybean mosaic virus strains. Crop Sci 22(6):1133–1136. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200060012x
Dielen AS, Badaoui S, Candresse T, Germanretana S (2010) The ubiquitin/26S proteasome system in plant–pathogen– interactions: a never-ending hide-and-seek game. Mol Plant Pathol 11:293–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14047302
Fu SX, Zhan Y, Zhi HJ, Yu DY (2006) Mapping of SMV resistance gene Rsc7 by SSR markers in soybean. Genetica 128(1–3):63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-005-5535-9
Gore MA, Hayes AJ, Jeong SC, Yue YG, Buss GR, Maroof MS (2002) Mapping tightly linked genes controlling potyvirus infection at the Rsv1 and Rpv1 region in soybean. Genome 45(3):592–599. https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-009
Guo DQ, Zhi HJ, Wang YW, Gai JY, Zhou XA, Yang ZK, Li K, Li HC (2005) Identification and distribution of soybean mosaic virus strains in Middle and Northern Huang-huai region of China. Chin J Oil Crop Sci 27(4):64–68. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-9084.2005.04.015
Hayes AJ, Ma GR, Buss GR, Maroof MS (2000) Molecular marker mapping of Rsv4, a gene conferring resistance to all known strains of soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci 40(5):1434–1437. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4051434x
Hayes AJ, Jeong SC, Gore MA, Yue YG, Buss GR, Tolin SA, Maroof MS (2004) Recombination within a nucleotide-binding-site/leucine-rich-repeat gene cluster produces new variants conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Genetics 166(1):493–503. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.493
Hwang TY, Moon JK, Yu S, Yang K, Mohankumar S, Yu YH, Lee YH, Kim HS, Kim HM, Maroof MS, Jeong SH (2006) Application of comparative genomics in developing molecular markers tightly linked to the virus resistance gene Rsv4 in soybean. Genome 49:380–388. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955706776073457
Ilut DC, Lipka AE, Jeong N, Bae DN, Kim DH, Kim JH, Redekar N, Yang K, Park W, Kang ST, Kim N, Moon JK, Maroof MS, Gore MA, Jeong SC (2016) Identification of haplotypes at the Rsv4 genomic region in soybean associated with durable resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Theor Appl Genet 129(3):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2640-8
Jeong SC, Kristipati S, Hayes AJ, Maughan PJ, Noffsinger SL, Gunduz I, Buss GR, Maroof MS (2002) Genetic and sequence analysis of markers tightly linked to the soybean mosaic virus resistance gene, Rsv3. Crop Sci 42(1):265–270. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0265
Karthikeyan A, Li K, Li C, Yin JL, Li N, Yang YH, Song YP, Ren R, Zhi HJ, Gai JY (2018) Fine-mapping and identifying candidate genes conferring resistance to soybean mosaic virus strain SC20 in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 131(2):461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-3014-1
Kato S, Takada Y, Shimamura S, Hirata K, Sayama T, Taguchi-Shiobara F, Ishimoto M, Kikuchi A, Nishio T (2016) Transfer of the Rsv3 locus from ‘Harosoy’ for resistance to soybean mosaic virus strains C and D in Japan. Breed Sci 66(2):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.66.319
Lee S, Jun TH, Michel AP, Mian MAF (2015) SNP markers linked to QTL conditioning plant height, lodging, and maturity in soybean. Euphytica 203(3):521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1252-8
Li HC, Zhi HJ, Gai JY, Guo DQ, Wang WY, Li K, Bai L, Yang H (2006a) Inheritance and gene mapping of resistance to soybean mosaic virus strain SC14 in soybean. J Integr Plant Biol 48(12):1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00365.x
Li ZJ, Shi JG, Yang TZ (2006b) Research on salicylic acid-mediated signal transduction pathway of systemic acquired resistance in plant. Chin Agric Sci Bull 22(12):84–89. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2006.12.021
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009a) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li R, Yu C, Li YR, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2009b) SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25(15):1966–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336
Li D, Chen P, Alloatti J, Shi A, Chen YF (2010a) Identification of new alleles for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Crop Sci 50(2):649–655. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.06.0302
Li K, Yang QH, Zhi HJ, Gai JY (2010b) Identification and distribution of soybean mosaic virus strains in southern China. Plant Dis 94(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-94-3-0351
Li K, Ren R, Karthikeyan A, Yuan Y, Liu ZT, Zhong YK, Zhi HJ (2015) Genetic analysis and identification of two soybean mosaic virus resistance genes in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plant Breed 134(6):684–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12315
Liu MS, Kandoth PK, Warren SD, Yeckel G, Heinz R, Alden J, Yang CL, Jamai A, El-Mellouki T, Juvale PS, Hill J, Baum TJ, Cianzio S, Whitham SA, Korkin D, Mitchum MG, Meksem K (2012) A soybean cyst nematode resistance gene points to a new mechanism of plant resistance to pathogens. Nature 492(7428):256–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11651
Liu NX, Li M, Hu XB, Ma QB, Mu YH, Tan ZY, Xia QJ, Zhang GY, Nian H (2017) Construction of high-density genetic map and QTL mapping of yield-related and two quality traits in soybean RILs population by RAD-sequencing. BMC Genom 18(1):466. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3854-8
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25(4):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001
Lu R, Malcuit I, Moffett P, Ruiz MT, Peart J, Wu AJ, Rathjen PJ, Bendahmane A, Day L, Baulcombe DC (2003) High throughput virus-induced gene silencing implicates heat shock protein 90 in plant disease resistance. EMBO J 22(21):5690–5699. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg546
Ma Y, Li HC, Wang DG, Liu N, Zhi HJ (2010) Molecular mapping and marker assisted selection of soybean mosaic virus resistance gene RSC12 in soybean. Legume Genom Genet 1(8):41–46. https://doi.org/10.5376/lgg.2010.01.0008
Ma Y, Wang DG, Li HC, Zheng GJ, Yang YQ, Li HW, Zhi HJ (2011) Fine mapping of the RSC14Q locus for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Euphytica 181(1):127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0457-3
Maroof MS, Tucker DM, Skoneczka JA, Bowman BC, Tripathy S, Tolin S (2010) Fine mapping and candidate gene discovery of the soybean mosaic virus resistance gene, Rsv4. Plant Genome 3(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2009.07.0020
Murakami T, Matsuba S, Funatsuki H, Kawaguchi K, Saruyama H, Tanida M, Sato Y (2004) Over-expression of a small heat shock protein, sHSP17.7, confers both heat tolerance and UV-B resistance to rice plants. Mol Breed 13(2):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:molb.0000018764.30795.c1
Rui R, Liu S, Karthikeyan A, Wang T, Niu HP, Yin JL, Yang YH, Wang LQ, Yang QH, Zhi HJ, Li K (2017) Fine-mapping and identification of a novel locus Rsc15 underlying soybean resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Theor Appl Genet 130(11):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2966-5
Shi AN, Chen PY, Zheng CM, Hou AF, Zhang B (2008) A PCR-based marker for the Rsv1 locus conferring resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci 48(1):262–268. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0076
Sun HH, Xue F, Chen JS (2007) Advances in study on soybean mosaic virus (SMV). Chin Bull Life Sci 19(3):338–345. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-0374.2007.03.017
Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93(1):77–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
Wang YJ, Dongfang Y, Wang XQ, Yang YL, Yu DY, Gai JY, Wu XL, He CY, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2004) Mapping of five genes resistant to SMV strains in soybean. Acta Genet Sin 31(1):87–90
Wang DG, Ma Y, Liu N, Yang ZL, Zheng GJ, Zhi HJ (2011a) Fine mapping and identification of the soybean RSC4 resistance candidate gene to soybean mosaic virus. Plant Breed 130(6):653–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01888.x
Wang DG, Ma Y, Yang YQ, Liu N, Li CY, Song YP, Zhi HJ (2011b) Fine mapping and analyses of RSC8 resistance candidate genes to soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 122(3):555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1469-4
Wang DG, Zhi HJ, Zhang L (2013) Review on resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Chin J Oil Crop Sci 35(3):341–348. https://doi.org/10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.03.020
Wang DG, Li K, Zhi HJ (2018) Progresses of resistance on soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Sci Agric Sin 51(16):3040–3059. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.16.002
Whitham SA, Anderberg RJ, Chisholm ST, Carrington JC (2000) Arabidopsis RTM2 gene is necessary for specific restriction of tobacco etch virus and encodes an unusual small heat shock-like protein. Plant Cell 12(4):569–582. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.4.569
Yan H, Wang H, Cheng H, Hu Z, Chu S, Zhang G, Yu D (2015) Detection and fine-mapping of SC7 resistance genes via linkage and association analysis in soybean. J Integr Plant Biol 57(8):722–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12323
Yang QH, Gai JY (2011) Identification, inheritance and gene mapping of resistance to a virulent soybean mosaic virus strain SC15 in soybean. Plant Breed 130(2):128–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01797.x
Yang YQ, Zheng GJ, Han L, Wang DG, Yang XF, Yuan Y, Huang SH, Zhi HJ (2011) Genetic analysis and mapping of genes for resistance to multiple strains of soybean mosaic virus in a single resistant soybean accession PI96983. Theor Appl Genet 126(7):1783–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2092-y
Yu YG, Maroof MS, Buss GR, Maughan PJ, Tolin SA (1994) RFLP and microsatellite mapping of a gene for soybean mosaic virus resistance. Phytopathology 84(1):60–64. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-60
Yue YL, Liu NX, Jiang BJ, Li M, Wang HJ, Jiang Z, Pan HT, Xia QJ, Ma QB, Han TF, Nian H (2017) A single nucleotide deletion in J encoding GmELF3 confers long juvenility and is associated with adaption of tropic soybean. Mol Plant 10(4):656–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.004
Zeng Z (1993) Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(23):10972–10976. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.23.10972
Zhan Y, Zhi HJ, Yu DG, Gai JY (2006) Identification and distribution of SMV strains in Huang-Huai Valleys. Sci Agric Sin 39(10):2009–2015. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2006.10.009
Zhang CG, Jing HM, Zheng HL, Zhao ZQ (2001) Progress in plant resistance induced by salicylic acid. Life Sci Res 5(z1):185–189. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7847.2001.z1.039
Zhang CQ, Grosic S, Whitham SA, Hill JH (2012) The requirement of multiple defense genes in soybean Rsv1-mediated extreme resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25(10):1307–1313. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-02-12-0046-R
Zhao L, Wang DG, Zhang HY, Shen YC, Yang YQ, Li K, Wang LQ, Yang YH, Zhi HJ (2016) Fine mapping of the RSC8 locus and expression analysis of candidate SMV resistance genes in soybean. Plant Breed 135(6):701–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12428
Zheng GJ, Yang YQ, Ma Y, Yang XF, Chen SY, Ren R, Wang DG, Yang ZL, Zhi HJ (2014) Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of resistance gene RSC3Q to soybean mosaic virus in Qihuang 1. J Integr Agric 13(12):2608–2615. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60738-8
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Professor Haijian Zhi (Nanjing Agricultural University, People’s Republic of China) for kindly supplying the SMV of SC-15 strain and the susceptible soybean accession Nannong1138-2. We also thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou City (201804020015); the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-04-PS09) and the Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Biological Resources Protection and Utilization in Subtropics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ML and HN designed and directed the project. ML, NL, and QM participated in the analysis of phenotypic data. TL and ZC helped perform experiments. TL and QM was responsible for mapping the QTLs. ML and ZC performed the qRT-PCR analysis. ML and NL wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. NL designed the figures and tables in the manuscript. HN helped supervise the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Liu, N., Ma, Q. et al. Fine mapping and analyses of the RSC15ZH resistance candidate gene for the soybean mosaic virus. Euphytica 216, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02581-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02581-2