Abstract
The occurrence and distribution of Dothistroma needle blight (DNB) on Pinus mugo was studied in 2014–2015 around the Slovakia. In total, 42 localities were investigated both native and planted ones. Symptoms of DNB were observed on 35 localities only on planted shrubs. All these 35 localities are new P. mugo DNB stands. No DNB symptoms were observed in natural and naturally regenerated plantations. DNA was extracted from a total of 236 isolates and eight needle samples. Based on the ITS-rDNA comparisons and using species specific primers, both pathogenic Dothistroma species were detected: D. septosporum and D. pini. Isolates of D. septosporum had ITS sequences identical to D. septosporum from Europe and both mating types were identified with slight predominance of MAT2. The ratio of D. septosporum mating types varies significantly between sites, ranging from an equal proportion of each mating type to single mating type populations. D. pini ITS sequence grouped with D. pini from Ukraine, Russia and Switzerland and only MAT2 was found.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Dothistroma needle blight (DNB), also known as red band needle blight, is a very serious needle disease of conifers that primarily affects pine species (Pinus spp.). The disease is characterized by red bands surrounding black, erumpent conidiomata that split the epidermal layers of infected pine needles. These needles become necrotic, are cast, and after successive defoliation, the disease can result in stunted tree growth (Gibson 1972; van der Pas 1981). Needles of all ages are commonly affected (Gibson et al. 1964; Kowalski and Jankowiak 1998).
Two very similar ascomycete fungi are known to cause DNB: Dothistroma septosporum (Dorog.) Morelet and Dothistroma pini Hulbary (Barnes et al. 2004). D. septosporum is the pathogen responsible for the epidemics mentioned during the past 50 years; it has successfully invaded, becoming established in many European countries. During this time, the geographic distribution of the pathogen has expanded and serious disease epidemics have emerged (Barnes et al. 2014). D. septosporum has not only a worldwide geographical distribution but also a wide host range (Maschning and Pehl 1994; Woods 2003; Bradshaw 2004; Kehr et al. 2004; Kirisits and Cech 2006). In contrast, D. pini has a partly limited distribution and host range (Barnes et al. 2004, 2008; Ioos et al. 2010; Queloz et al. 2014).
D. septosporum was recorded for the first time in Slovakia in the locality of Modrý Kameň in 1996 (Kunca and Foffová 2000), located in Central South Slovakia close to the Hungarian border. Consequently, it might have spread naturally from Hungary (Kunca and Foffová 2000; Zúbrik et al. 2006; Barnes et al. 2011). Later, the area of its distribution gradually extended further into Slovakia. It can presently be found in forests on trees aged from 5 to 100 years in all the regions of Slovakia (Zúbrik et al. 2006; Pastirčáková et al. 2014).
Pinus nigra Arnold (Austrian pine), a species considered to be exotic to Slovakia, is the main host species of DNB in Slovakia (Zúbrik et al. 2006). It was planted widely in the 1980s, but now its use is decreasing. The disease mainly affects P. nigra Christmas-tree plantations; but, there are some young P. nigra plantations in extreme environmental conditions, such as with shallow soil, south slope exposure and dry climate, where severe D. septosporum infection has caused mortality (Zúbrik et al. 2006).
There are no published data about DNB infection on Pinus sylvestris L. (Zúbrik et al. 2006; Kunca et al. 2010; Foffová and Foff 2007; Pastirčáková et al. 2014). Barnes et al. (2004) used in their phylogeny study one isolate of D. septosporum isolated from P. sylvestris (Scots pine) with origin from Slovakia without any extra information about locality, nor about date of collection.
So far there is no evidence of the occurrence of the fungus on seedlings and transplants in forest nurseries. This may be caused by the intensive fungicidal control of needle cast diseases on P. nigra as well as P. sylvestris (Zúbrik et al. 2006).
As well as the susceptible P. nigra, microscopic identification of Dothistroma sp. was confirmed on introduced pine species Pinus jeffreyi Grev. & Balf. and Pinus aristata Engelm., and on mountain pine Pinus mugo Turra in urban greenery in Slovakia (Foffová and Foff 2007).
Mating type genes play an important part in the biology and evolution of fungal species. Thus, knowledge of these genes can provide insight into the potential of sexual reproduction in different species (Groenewald et al. 2007). D. septosporum and D. pini are heterothallic ascomycetes for which both mating type genes have been identified by Groenewald et al. (2007). Two studies investigating the mating types of Dothistroma sp. have included isolates from Slovakia, by Groenewald et al. (2007) and by Barnes et al. (2014) with 1 and 24 isolates analysed, respectively.
The aims of the present study were: i) to determine the occurrence and distribution of DNB on P. mugo, ii) to compare the infection of P. mugo native and planted stands, iii) to identify the Dothistroma species on P. mugo, and iv) to characterize the fungus population with respect to mating types. The current study makes an important contribution to DNB population studies in this part of Europe, where the fungal population data were missing.
Materials and methods
Study area and sampling
The investigation was carried out in the years 2014–2015. Localities with Pinus mugo situated around Slovakia were selected and examined. The descriptions of evaluated localities are listed in Table 1. Both natural, naturally regenerated sites and planted individuals of P. mugo in urban greenery were selected.
Samples were collected from P. mugo visually classified as affected by DNB according EPPO descriptions. The needles demonstrated the following symptoms were collected: needle tip dieback, dead tip of needles in brown/ red in colour, red or brown banding on needle, small black fruit bodies in affected part of needle. One sample was collected from one tree. In case of five and less trees presented in a stand, needles from each tree were collected as separate samples. When more than five trees were present in a stand, randomly selected trees were sampled, but a minimum of five. Number of collected needles per samples depended on the infection intensity and the size of the evaluated tree. The needles were collected randomly from different parts of the tree crown. Every sample consisted of at least 30 needles. Preferentially the needles showing presence of mature conidiomata were selected. Infected needles collected from the field were deposited in freezers until processing. Herbarium specimens are deposited in the Plant Pathology Herbarium of the Institute of Forest Ecology of Slovak Academy of Sciences (NR).
Fungal isolation
The needles were gently surface-sterilized by wiping with 96 % ethyl alcohol-soaked tissue and placed in the damp chamber for 24 h. From five randomly selected needles single conidiomata per needle were selected. Conidiomata were excised under a binocular microscope using a scalpel, placed in sterile distilled water on the glass slide, gently crushed with a scalpel and transferred with water using a micropipette onto the surface of water agar (15 g/1 l) supplemented with antibiotic (100 mg l−1 streptomycin sulphate) in Petri plates.
Blocks of agar were cut from the plates in areas where germinating conidia occurred but no contaminating debris. These blocks were then transferred to new plates with water agar and subsequently sub-cultured on 3 % MEA. Cultures were incubated at 20 °C until colonies formed. Cultures used in this study are stored in the culture collection of Institute of Forest Ecology SAS Zvolen, Branch for Woody Plants Biology Nitra. Dothistroma isolates were used for DNA extractions and further analyses (sequencing, mating type assay).
Isolation of DNA and sequencing
DNA was extracted from pure fungal cultures after incubation for ca. 3 weeks at temperature 20 °C in 3 % MEA. In samples where the isolation of the fungus in pure culture was not successful, the DNA was extracted directly from the infected needles (in total, eight samples from localities Bystrá, Dlhá nad Oravou, Horný Smokovec 2 samples, Nitra, Párnica, Ružomberok- Biely Potok, Valkovňa; Table 1, No’s 4, 6, 12, 20, 22, 25, 34 respectively). 3–8 conidiomata / sample were excised from the infected needles after surface sterilization with 96 % ethyl alcohol. DNA extraction was done using the E.Z.N.A.® Fungal DNA Mini-Kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
5× HOT FIREPol® Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne) consists of HOT FIREPol® DNA polymerase, proofreading enzyme, 5× Blend Master Mix Buffer, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dNTPs, BSA, blue and yellow dye was used for all PCR reactions in this study.
Identification to species level was done by conventional PCR using species specific primers according to Groenewald et al. (2007), where the targeted genes are α domain (MAT1–1-1) and HMG domain (MAT1–2). Amplification of DNA was performed in PCR reaction mix using approximately 2 ng/μl of template DNA, forward and reverse primers (10 pmol/μl), 5× HOT FIREPol® Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne) and molecular grade water added up to 20 μl. After an initial denaturation step for 15 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles were performed each comprising a denaturation step at 94 °C for 20 s, an annealing step was different for D. pini at 65 °C and for D. septosporum at 63 °C for 30 s, and an extension step at 72 °C for 40 s followed by a final extension step for 5 min at 72 °C.
In case of negative results in Dothistroma species identification following Groenewald et al. (2007), species specific primers according to Ioos et al. (2010) were used. The conventional PCR reactions were carried out in 20 μl reaction volumes. The cycling conditions were the same for both Dothistroma species, included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 60 s; with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA was amplified for the randomly selected samples (23 D. septosporum and 1 D. pini sample) with primers ITS1F and ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993) to sequence the amplicons in both directions. Amplification of DNA was performed in PCR reaction mix consists of approximately 2 ng/ μl of template DNA, 5× HOT FIREPol® Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne), forward and reverse primers (10 pmol/μl) and molecular-grade water added up to 20 μl. Molecular-grade water was used as negative amplification control during preparation of the reaction mix. Reaction conditions included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 14 min, followed by 13 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 35 s, annealing at 55 °C for 55 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 45 s; followed by a further 13 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 35 s, annealing at 55 °C for 55 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 2 min, and then lastly 9 cycles with the same condition for denaturation and annealing, with a longer elongation 3 min. A final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 10 min. Prior to sequencing, target fragments were directly purified using an PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each amplified product was diluted with 30 μl H2O. Sequence reactions were run an ABI3130xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems) at SEQme s.r.o. (Dobříš, Czech Republic). The retrieved sequences were compared by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, available at http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) against DNA sequences deposited in GenBank for Mycosphaerella pini (AY808294) and Dothistroma pini (AY808302, DQ926964, KJ878557, KJ878558). ITS sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank.
Mating type assays
The DNB species and mating type specific primers (Groenewald et al. 2007) were used to confirm the mating type of all obtained fungal isolates. They were also used for Dothistroma species identification, PCR mixture and conditions are described above. The species-specific primers amplify regions of approximately 820 bp and 480 bp for MAT1 and MAT2 in D. pini and 823 bp and 480 bp for MAT1 and MAT2 in D. septosporum.
An exact binomial test using two-tailed P-values (software R version 3.1.3.) was used to determine whether populations deviated from the null hypothesis of 1:1 ratio of mating types. Localities with low sample size were excluded from this analysis (N ≤ 4).
Results
Disease incidence
Forty-two localities with P. mugo were investigated around Slovakia. From these locations, five were natural or naturally regenerated P. mugo stands, all situated in the Tatry Mountains where natural plantations of mountain pine are situated. The rest of the evaluated localities were planted stands.
Symptoms of Dothistroma needle blight (DNB) were observed at 35 localities. All these 35 localities were new P. mugo DNB stands, demonstrating that the disease has spread across the country. No DNB symptoms were observed on P. mugo shrubs in natural and naturally regenerated plantations, all were disease free. Shrubs were only infected in planted, ornamental stands (94.6 % of them, two of them were without symptoms). Although incidence was high, disease severity varied and was not precisely evaluated. The younger shrubs were less infected than the older annually-repeatedly infected. In some cases the defoliation was observed, only the last year needles retain. Symptoms were present on the previous years’ needles, with typical red or brownish bands on needles bearing conidiomata.
Fungal isolation
Isolates originated from different needles from the same trees and from different trees from the same locality. In total 236 isolates were obtained from the host trees. Isolation of the fungus was not successful in six localities: Bystrá, Dlhá nad Oravou, Nitra, Párnica, Ružomberok- Biely Potok, Valkovňa (Table 1, No’s 4, 6, 20, 22, 25, 34 respectively).
The fungal mycelium was firstly white and aerial in culture, which turned greyish-brown in colonies, then orange brown to grey-black with black stromata. The colonies grew slowly and agar was mostly coloured light reddish-brown by diffusates from the colonies.
DNA extraction, sequencing
DNA was extracted from all 236 fungal isolates. From the total DNA extraction in subsequent PCR amplifications 96.70 % produced bands for at least one species-specific primer combination. No positive DNB result was obtained for one locality Valkovňa (Table 1, No 34), in spite of the red band symptoms and conidiomata being present in the sample.
All DNB positive samples, except two, were identified as D. septosporum based on PCR test using species-specific primers. D. septosporum was detected in each evaluated locality, except one Nitra (Table 1, No 20). In this locality (Nitra) only D. pini was detected from needle samples.
Three isolates and one sample from needles from three different localities (Nitra - needles, Bachledova Dolina – isolate, Sečovce – two isolates; Table 1, No’s 20, 2, 26 respectively) were identified as D. pini based on the PCR test using species-specific primers. Two isolates from different localities Bachledova Dolina and Sečovce (Table 1, No’s 2, 26 respectively) gave positive results for D. septosporum and D. pini simultaneously.
The ITS sequences obtained with primers ITS1/ITS4 for 23 D. septosporum samples were identical, sequence identity was 100 %. They showed a high degree of similarity to the DNA sequence deposited in GenBank for Mycosphaerella pini with accession number AY808294 (Barnes et al. 2008).
The ITS sequence obtained for the D. pini isolate showed the 100 % homology to the sequence DQ926964 from Ukraine and KJ878558 from Switzerland (Queloz et al. 2014; Barnes et al. 2008).
The ITS sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the GenBank (for GenBank accession numbers see Table 1).
Mating type
The mating type analysis was carried out for a total of 232 DNA samples of D. septosporum. For nine isolates the mating type identification failed (isolates from localities Bachledova Dolina, Duchonka, Hybe, Nemecká, Sečovce, Tatranská Lomnica and Zvolen; Table 1, No’s 2, 9, 13, 19, 26, 27, 32, 42 respectively); both mating types were identified for five isolates from localities Hybe, Stará Lesná and Tatranská Lomnica (Table 2, No’s 13, 27, 32 respectively). The results of mating type analysis are showed in Table 2 and the mating type distribution over Slovakia in Fig. 1.
Generally, in Slovakia, both mating types of D. septosporum were identified within all the samples from the evaluated localities. Both mating types were identified in 15 localities, only MAT1 in five localities (15 %) and only MAT 2 in 13 localities (39.4 %).
A P-value two-tailed test was made for 15 population (15 localities), where the number of samples was more than four. Four populations, from localities Korytnica, Nový Smokovec, Tatranská Lomnica and Víglaš (Table 2, No’s 14, 21, 32, 35 respectively), deviated significantly from the 1:1 ratio of random mating with the MAT2 idiomorph being significantly more common in three of them (localities Korytnica, Tatranská Lomnica and Víglaš, Table 2, No’s 14, 32 and 35 respectively) while in other one Nový Smokovec (Table 2 No 21) the MAT1 was dominated. All other localities showed evidence of a randomly mating type population. When the whole Slovakian dataset was taken into account, the mating type did not significantly differed from a 1:1 ratio, in spite of the slight dominance of MAT2 idiomorph.
The obtained D. pini isolate from locality Sečovce (Table 1, No 26) presented the mating type MAT2.
Discussion
The first report of DNB caused by D. septosporum in Slovakia comes from 1996 (Kunca and Foffová 2000; Zúbrik et al. 2006) when the symptoms were observed on a P. nigra host tree. Both P. nigra and P. sylvestris have been reported as confirmed host trees of D. septosporum in Slovakia (Barnes et al. 2004, 2014) but the information about Dothistroma spp. in Slovakia is limited.
The results of this study provide the first detailed country report of DNB in Slovakia on P. mugo, a new host species for Slovakia, while DNA based diagnostic tools confirmed the presence of both Dothistroma species. This was not unexpected as this host tree has been reported as moderately susceptible (Watt et al. 2009) and as a host tree for DNB in surrounding countries: the Czech Republic (Bednářová et al. 2006), Poland (Boroń et al. 2016), Austria (Kirisits and Cech 2006) and Hungary (Barnes et al. 2007), but the reports of D. pini on P. mugo are rare.
In this study, 35 new localities with DNB were discovered for Slovakia. They are located all over the country with a major concentration in the northern-most central part. According to results of Watt et al. (2009) using an Ecoclimatic Index (EI) classification (Kriticos et al. 2003a, 2003b), this part of the country was classified as an optimal area for Dothistroma spp. (EI > 25, CLIMEX™ model integrates potential for population growth of host and fungus, soil moisture and temperature, length of growing season, stress index). All five evaluated natural and naturally regenerated localities of P. mugo are situated in the High Tatra Mountains at altitudes between 1255 and 1781 m. All the natural and naturally regenerated localities were DNB free, in spite of that they are situated in optimal ecoclimatic condition for DNB (Watt et al. 2009) and in the surrounding villages the ornamental ones were highly infected. In Poland also, the ornamental type of P. mugo trees were infected (Boroń et al. 2016), in Slovenia and Switzerland trees in gardens and parks in urban areas were infected as well (Queloz et al. 2014; Piskur et al. 2013). Damage has been also detected on P. mugo in Serbia, but only on park trees, it was never attacked by M. pini in natural habitats (Karadžič 2004). There is a different situation in Germany where both types of P. mugo localities (native and ornamental) are infected (Maschning and Pehl 1994; Pehl and Butin 1992). DNB was first noticed in south Germany in 1983 (Butin and Richter 1983) and from 1994 was observed in the native areas of P. mugo at altitudes between 1200 and 1600 m (Maschning and Pehl 1994).
D. septosporum (as Cytosporina septospora Dorog.) was first described by Doroguine (1911) from P. mugo in Russia. In Hungary, the first DNB collections from P. mugo trees (five trees, approx. 10- to 20-year-old) came from ornamental trees in the botanical garden of the University of West Hungary in Sopron; where D. septosporum was identified as the causal agent (Barnes et al. 2008). Similarly in Slovenia, where both Dothistroma species were identified, only D. septosporum has been confirmed on P. mugo (Piskur et al. 2013). In the Czech Republic, P. mugo is the most frequent host trees besides P. nigra, and only D. septosporum has been identified (Bednářová et al. 2006). Only recently, in Poland, D. septosporum was identified on this host trees (Boroń et al. 2016). In 2002, D. septosporum was detected for the first time in Lithuania on P. mugo (Jovaišiené and Pavilionis 2005), which was the only record of this fungus for several years afterward. Later in 2007, D. septosporum was found on several ornamental P. mugo in Estonia (Hanso and Drenkhan 2008).
In the first report about D. septosporum mating types from Slovakia, only one isolate was analysed and reported as MAT1 (Groenewald et al. 2007). Later (samples collected in 2006), one larger population (23 isolates from one P. nigra location) was analysed and the mating types were considered to be in equilibrium in that population (Barnes et al. 2011).
The occurrence of both mating types of D. septosporum found in the current study supports the results of Groenewald et al. (2007), Barnes et al. (2011), Tomšovský et al. (2013), and Boroń et al. (2016), who studied the mating type system of D. septosporum and also found both mating types among their set of isolates from the neighbouring countries: Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland. The close proximity of isolates of opposite mating type would increase the chance of sexual reproduction and the development of the teleomorphic stage (Barnes et al. 2011). The teleomorph of D. septosporum has not been observed in the Slovak Republic yet, and reports in other European countries are unusual (Butin 1985; Karadžič 1989; Kowalski and Jankowiak 1998). The asci and ascospores have only rarely been observed, although an extensive observation was performed (Kowalski and Jankowiak 1998). Additionally, Groenewald et al. (2007) confirmed the presence of both mating types in Austria, United Kingdom and Poland, Barnes et al. (2011) in Hungary, and Tomšovský et al. (2013) in the Czech Republic. Nevertheless, the occurrence of the teleopmorph was occasionally recorded in three European countries: Germany, Serbia and Poland (Butin 1985; Karadžič 1989; Kowalski and Jankowiak 1998), with similar environmental conditions. The results presented in this study confirm the occurrence of both mating types at 15 studied localities (more than 45 % of all evaluated localities) what increase the possibility for sexual reproduction of the pathogen. However, further investigation is necessary to determine the genetic affinity of isolates.
D. pini has been reported from France, Belgium, Czech Republic and Switzerland, but from different host trees, not from P. mugo (Fabre et al. 2012; Piou and Ioos 2014; Queloz et al. 2014). The only published report for D. pini isolated from P. mugo originated from south west Russia (Barnes et al. 2011).
One sequenced D. pini isolate (KX058162) showed 100 % homology to the sequence DQ926964 from Ukraine and KJ878558 from Switzerland (Queloz et al. 2014; Barnes et al. 2011). The detection of this species at locations in Slovakia supports the views of Barnes et al. (2011) that the fungus might be also present in other parts of Europe. This isolate groups with isolates of D. pini originated from Ukraine (Tsjurupinsk area) and Russia (south west part: Tarasovsky and Krasnosulinski districts) isolated from three host pine species: P. mugo, P. pallasiana and P. nigra. The D. pini of the same group was identified also in Switzerland from P. nigra (Queloz et al. 2014). The locality where the D. pini isolate came from is situated in the south-east part of Slovakia, close to the Ukrainian and Hungarian borders. The D. pini isolates from Hungary with known sequences all originated from west of the country and they do not group with the examined Slovakian D. pini isolate (Barnes et al. 2011). Introduction of D. pini into Slovakia could have been from Ukraine. The mating type of the Slovak D. pini isolate presented the MAT2 mating type gene. In the major part of Europe, the same mating type gene was reported for D. pini. Only MAT2 was identified in all screened D. pini isolates from Hungary, Russia (Barnes et al. 2011) and Slovenia (Piskur et al. 2013). In Switzerland, within D. pini both mating types were present and sometimes in the same needle of P. nigra in a forest site (Queloz et al. 2014). In Ukraine also, both mating types of D. pini were identified in Tsyurupinsk area: MAT1 (Groenewald et al. 2007) and MAT2 (Barnes et al. 2011).
DNA extraction from two samples (two isolates) from localities Bachledova Dolina and Sečovce (Table 1, No’s 2 and 26) gave positive results for D. septosporum and D. pini simultaneously, a 231-bp fragment using D. septosporum –specific primers and a 193-bp fragment using D. pini-specific primers (Ioos et al. 2010) were amplified using DNA extracted from culture. These results indicate concurrent infections of both species on the same host and in the same needle. This work supports that of Ioos et al. (2010), Barnes et al. (2011) and Piskur et al. (2013) by documenting the overlap of geographical ranges and the co-existence of both species within the single needle.
Results of this study are consistent with the increasing number of new reports of Dothistroma pathogens from new areas and hosts. Recently, the occurrence of DNB symptoms, hosts and Dothistroma species characterization has been intensified in Slovakia.
References
Barnes, I., Crous, P. W., Wingfield, M. J., & Wingfield, B. D. (2004). Multigene phylogenies reveal that red band needle blight of Pinus is caused by two distinct species of Dothistroma, D. septosporum and D. pini. Studies in Mycology, 50, 551–565.
Barnes, I., Kirisits, T., Akulov, A., Chhetri, D.B., Wingfield, M.J., Bulgakov, T.S, Wingfield, B.D. (2007). New reports of Dothistroma needle blight in Eurasian countries. Acta Silvatica and Lignaria Hungarica, Special Edition 2007, 237–238.
Barnes, I., Kirisits, T., Akulov, A., Chhetri, D. B., Wingfield, B. D., Bulgakov, T. S., & Wingfield, M. J. (2008). New host and country records of the Dothistroma needle blight pathogens from Europe and Asia. Forest Pathology, 38(3), 178–195.
Barnes, I., Kirisits, T., Wingfield, M. J., & Wingfield, B. D. (2011). Needle blight of pine caused by two species of Dothistroma in Hungary. Forest Pathology, 41(5), 361–369.
Barnes, I., Wingfield, M. J., Carbone, I., Kirisits, T., & Wingfield, B. D. (2014). Population structure and diversity in an invasive pine needle pathogen reflects anthropogenic activity. Ecology and Evolution, 4(18), 3642–3661. doi:10.1002/ece3.1200.
Bednářová, M., Palovčíková, D., & Jankovský, L. (2006). The host spectrum of Dothistroma needle blight Mycosphaerella pini E. Rostrup – new hosts of Dothistroma needle blight observed in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 52(1), 30–36.
Bergová, E., & Kryštofová, A. (2014). First report of Dothistroma pini, agent of the Dothistroma needle blight, on Pinus in the Czech Republic. Mykologické listy, 129, 18–19.
Boroń, P., Lenart-Boroń, A., & Mullett, M. (2016). The distribution of Dothistroma septosporum and its mating types in Poland. Forest Pathology, 46(5), 489–496. doi:10.1111/efp.12262.
Bradshaw, R. E. (2004). Dothistroma (red-band) needle blight of pines and the dothistromin toxin. Forest Pathology, 34(3), 163–185.
Butin, H. (1985). Teleomorph- und anamorph-Entwicklung von Scirrhia pini Funk & Parker auf Nadeln von Pinus nigra Arnold. [teleomorph and anamorph development of Scirrhia pini Funk & Parker of needles from Pinus nigra Arnold]. Sydowia, Annales Mycologici Ser. II, 38, 20–27.
Butin, V., & Richter, J. (1983). Dothistroma needle blight: a new disease on pine in the Federal Republic of Germany. Nachrichtenbl Deut Pflanzenschutzd, 35, 129–131.
Doroguine, M. (1911). Une maladie cryptogamique du Pin. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France, 27, 105–106.
Fabre, B., Ioos, R., Piou, D., & Marçais, B. (2012). Is the emergence of Dothistroma needle blight of pine in France caused by the cryptic species Dothistroma pini? Phytopathology, 102(1), 47–54.
Foffová, E., & Foff, V. (2007). Sypavky borovíc spôsobené fytokaranténnymi hubami z rodu Mycosphaerella na Slovensku [needle blight of pines caused by quarantine fungi from genus Mycosphaerella in Slovakia]. In M. Kodrík & P. Hlaváč (Eds.), Ochrana lesa 2007- Zborník vedeckých a odborných prác z medzinárodnej konferencie (pp. 59–64). Zvolen: Technická univerzita.
Gardes, M., & Bruns, T. D. (1993). ITS primers with enhanced specifity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2(2), 113–118.
Gibson, I. A. S. (1972). Dothistroma blight of Pinus radiata. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 10, 51–72.
Gibson, I. A. S., Christensen, P. S., & Munga, F. M. (1964). First observations in Kenya of a foliage disease of pines caused by Dothistroma pini Hulbary. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 43, 31–42.
Groenewald, M., Barnes, I., Bradshaw, R. E., Brown, A., Dale, A., Groenewald, J. Z., Lewis, K. J., Wingfield, B. D., Wingfield, M. J., & Crous, P. W. (2007). Characterization and worldwide distribution of the mating type genes in the Dothistroma needle blight pathogens. Phytopathology, 97(8), 825–834.
Hanso, M., & Drenkhan, R. (2008). First observations of Mycosphaerella pini in Estonia. Plant Pathology, 57(6), 1177.
Ioos, R., Fabre, B., Saurat, C., Fourrier, C., Frey, P., & Marcais, B. (2010). Development, comparison, and validation of real-time and conventional PCR tools for the detection of the fungal pathogens causing brown spot and red band needle blights of pine. Phytopathology, 100(1), 105–114.
Jovaišiené, Z., & Pavilionis, R. (2005). Mycosphaerella pini is causing red band needle blight of pine in Lithuania (Pušinis rutulgrybis (Mycosphaerella pini) – raudunjuostés spyglių degligés sukéléjas Lietuvoje). Mūsų girios, 5, 7 (in Lithuanian).
Karadžič, D. (1989). Scirrhia pini Funk et Parker. Life cycle of the fungus in plantations of Pinus nigra Arn. in Serbia. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 19(4), 231–236.
Karadžič, D. (2004). The distribution, hosts, epidemiology, impact and control of the fungus Mycosphaerella pini E. Rostrup apud and Munk. in Serbia. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry University in Belgrad, 90, 7–36.
Kehr, R., Pehl, L., Wulf, A., Schröder, T., & Kaminski, K. (2004). Zur Gefährdung von Bäumen und Waldökosystemen durch eingeschleppte Krankheiten und Schädlinge [introduced pests and diseases as risks to trees and forest ecosystems]. Nachrichtenbl Deut Pflanzenschutzd, 56, 217–238.
Kirisits, T., & Cech, L. T. (2006). Entwickelt sich die Dothistroma-Nadelbräune zu einem Forstschutzproblem in Österreich? [is Dothistroma needle blight going to become an important forest disease in Austria?]. Forstschutz Aktuell, 36, 20–26 http://www.waldwissen.net/themen/waldschutz/pilze_nematoden/bfw_nadelbraeune_kiefer_2006_DE). Accessed 22 February 2016.
Kowalski, T., & Jankowiak, R. (1998). First record of Dothistroma septospora (Dorog.) Morelet in Poland: a contribution to the symptomology and epidemiology. Phytopathologia Polonica, 16, 16–29.
Kriticos, D. J., Sutherst, R. W., Brown, J. R., Adkins, S. A., & Maywald, G. F. (2003a). Climate change and biotic invasions: a case history of a tropical woody vine. Biological Invasions, 5(3), 147–165.
Kriticos, D. J., Sutherst, R. W., Brown, J. R., Adkins, S. A., & Maywald, G. F. (2003b). Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40(1), 111–124.
Kunca, A., Foffová, E. (2000). Ohrozenie porastov borovice čiernej fytokaranténnym patogénom Dothistroma septospora (Dorog.) Merelet [The threat to Austrian pine plantations from the phytosanitary pathogen Dothistroma septospora (Dorog) Morelet]. In J. Varínsky (Ed.), Aktuálne problémy v ochrane lesa 2000, (pp. 136–139), Zvolen: Lesnícky výskumný ústav (LVU). (in Slovak).
Kunca, A., Brutovský, D., Finďo, S., Galko, J., Gubka, A., Kaštier, P., Konôpka, B., Leontovyč, R., Longauerová, V., Nikolov, C., Vakula, J., Varínsky, J., & Zúbrik, M. (2010). Problémy ochrany lesa v roku 2009 a prognóza na rok 2010 [problems in forest protectionin the 2009 and prognosis for the year 2010]. In A. Kunca (Ed.), Aktuálne problémy v ochrane lesa 2010 (pp. 5–18). Zvolen: Národné lesnícke centrum (in Slovak).
Maschning, E., & Pehl, L. (1994). Bedrohung autochthoner Latschen durch Dothistroma-Nadelbräune [threat to authochthonous dwarf mountain pine by Dothistroma needle blight]. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift, 49, 249–252.
Pastirčáková, K., Ivanová, H., Pastirčák, M. (2014). Druhová diverzita húb na boroviciach (Pinus spp.) v mestskej a mimomestskej vegetácii [Fungal species diversity in pines (Pinus spp.) in urban nonurban greenery]. In M. Barta, P. Ferus (Eds.) Dendrologické dni v Arboréte Mlyňany SAV 2014 recenzovaný zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie (pp. 150–157). Vieska nad Žitavou: Arborétum Mlyňany SAV. (in Slovak).
Pehl, L., & Butin, H. (1992). Dothistroma septospora, a new fungus pest on Pinus mugo. Allgemeine Forst Zeitschrift der Wald, 47, 758–760.
Piou, D., & Ioos, R. (2014). First report of Dothistroma pini, a recent agent of the Dothistroma needle blight, on Pinus radiata in France. Plant Diseases, 98(6), 841. doi:10.1094/PDIS-01-13-0068-PDN.
Piskur, B., Hauptman, T., & Jurc, D. (2013). Dothistroma needle blight in Slovenia is caused by two cryptic species: Dothistroma pini and Dothistroma septosporum. Forest Pathology, 46(6), 518–521.
Queloz, V., Wey, T., & Holdenrieder, O. (2014). First record of Dothistroma pini on Pinus nigra in Switzerland. Plant Disease, 98(12), 1744.2–1744.2.
Schmitz, S., Gischer, F., Chandelier, A. (2013). First detection of Dothistroma pini in Belgium. In Book of Abstracts of the Conference of IUFRO Working Party 7.02.02 Foliage, shoot and stem diseases of forest trees, ‘Biosecurity in natural forests and plantations, genomics and biotechnology for biosecurity in forestry’. Brno: Mendel University.
Tomšovský, M., Tomešová, V., Palovčíková, D., Kostovčík, M., Rohrer, M., Hanáček, P., & Jankovský, L. (2013). The gene flow and mode of reproduction of Dothistroma septosporum in the Czech Republic. Plant Pathology, 62(1), 59–68.
van der Pas, J. B. (1981). Reduced early growth rates of Pinus radiata caused by Dothistroma pini. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 11, 210–220.
Watt, M. S., Kriticos, D. J., Alcaraz, S., Brown, A. V., & Leriche, A. (2009). The hosts and potential geographic range of Dothistroma needle blight. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(6), 1505–1519.
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: a sequencing guide to methods and applications (pp. 315–322). San Diego: Academic Press.
Woods, A. J. (2003). Species diversity and forest health in Northwest British Columbia. The Forestry Chronicle, 79(5), 892–897.
Zúbrik, M., Kunca, A., Turčani, M., Vakula, J., & Leontovyč, R. (2006). Invasive and quarantine pests in forests in Slovakia. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 36(2), 402–408.
Acknowledgments
This study was financed by the Slovak VEGA grant agency, project 2/0069/14 and is a contribution to the project Diarod funded by EU COST Action (FP1102).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ondrušková, E., Hečková, Z., Horáková, M.K. et al. Distribution and characterization of Dothistroma needle blight pathogens on Pinus mugo in Slovakia. Eur J Plant Pathol 148, 283–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1088-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1088-2