Abstract
In reservoir management, production optimization is performed using gradient-based algorithms that commonly rely on an adjoint formulation to efficiently compute control gradients. Often, however, economic constraints are implicitly embedded within the optimization procedure through well performance limits enforced at each reservoir simulation time-step. These limits effectively restrict the operational capabilities of the wells, e.g., they stop or shut down production depending on a predetermined profitability threshold for the well. Various studies indicate that the accuracy of the gradient and, by consequence, the performance of the optimization algorithm suffer from this type of heuristic constraint enforcement. In this paper, an analytical framework is developed to study the effects of enforcing simulator-based economic constraints when performing gradient-based production optimization that relies on derivatives obtained through an adjoint formulation. The framework attributes the loss in control gradient sensitivity to non-differentiable unscheduled changes in the well model equations. The discontinuous nature of these changes leads to inconsistencies within the adjoint gradient formulation. These inconsistencies, in turn, reduce gradient quality and subsequently decrease algorithmic performance. Based on the developed framework, we devise an efficient simulator-based mode of constraint enforcement that yields gradients with fewer consistency errors. In this implementation, the well model equations that violate constraints are removed from the governing system right after the violation occurs and are not reinserted until the next well status update. The constraint enforcement modes are further coupled with a strategy that improves the selection of initial controls for subsequent iterations of the optimization procedure. After a given simulation, the resulting combination of open and shut-in periods generates a status update schedule, or shut-in history. The shut-in history of the current optimal solution is saved and used in subsequent optimization iterations to make the status update a part of the optimal solution. The novel simulation-based constraint implementation, with and without shut-in history, is applied to two production optimization cases where, for a large set of initial guesses, and different model realizations, it retains and improves the performance of the search procedure compared to when using common modes of economic constraint enforcement during production optimization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bellout, M.C., Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Durlofsky, L.J., Foss, B., Kleppe, J.: Joint optimization of oil well placement and controls. Comput. Geosci. 16(4), 1061–1079 (2012)
Bukshtynov, V., Volkov, O., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K.: Comprehensive framework for gradient-based optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. Comput. Geosci. 19(4), 877–897 (2015)
Cao, Y., Li, S., Petzold, L., Serban, R.: Adjoint sensitivity analysis for differential-algebraic equations: the adjoint DAE system and its numerical solution. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24(3), 1076–1089 (2003)
Chen, C., Li, G., Reynolds, A.: Robust constrained optimization of shortand long-term net present value for closed-loop reservoir management. SPE J. 17(3), 849–864 (2012)
Forouzanfar, F., Rossa, E., Russo, R., Reynolds, A.: Life-cycle production optimization of an oil field with an adjoint-based gradient approach. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 112, 351–358 (2013)
Geoquest: eclipse technical description Schlumberger (2005)
Gill, P., Murray, W., Saunders, M.: User’s Guide for SNOPT Version 7: Software for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming Stanford University (2008)
Gill, P.E., Murray, W., Saunders, M.: SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12(4), 979–1006 (2002)
Haldorsen, H.: Choosing between rocks, hard places and a lot more: the economic interface. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications 6(C), 291–312 (1996)
Jansen, J.: Adjoint-based optimization of multi-phase flow through porous media—a review. Comput. Fluids 46(1), 40–51 (2011)
Jansen, J.D., Fonseca, R.M., Kahrobaei, S., Siraj, M.M., Van Essen, G.M., Van den Hof, P.M.J.: The egg model—a geological ensemble for reservoir simulation. Geoscience Data Journal 1(2)
Kourounis, D., Durlofsky, L.J., Jansen, J., Aziz, K.: Adjoint formulation and constraint handling for gradient-based optimization of compositional reservoir flow. Comput. Geosci. 18(2), 117–137 (2014)
Liu, X., Reynolds, A.C.: Gradient-based multi-objective optimization with applications to waterflooding optimization. Comput. Geosci. 20(3), 677–693 (2016)
de Montleau, P., Cominelli, A., Neylon, K., Rowan, D., Pallister, I., Tesaker, O., Nygard, I.: Production optimization under constraints using adjoint gradients. 10th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (A41) (2006)
Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (2006)
Peters, E., Chen, Y., Leeuwenburgh, O., Oliver, D.: Extended Brugge benchmark case for history matching and water flooding optimization. Comput. Geosci. 50, 16–24 (2013)
Priestley, H.: Introduction to integration. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)
Riesz, F.: Sur les opérations fonctionnelles linéaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 149, 974–977 (1909)
Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K., Chen, W.H.: Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating. Comput. Geosci. 10(1), 3–36 (2006)
Svanberg, K.: The method of moving asymptotes - a new method for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 24(2), 359–373 (1987)
Talvila, E.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for differentiating under the integral sign. Am. Math. Mon. 108(6), 544–848 (2001)
Van Essen, G., Zandvliet, M., Van Den Hof, P., Bosgra, O., Jansen, J.: Robust waterflooding optimization of multiple geological scenarios. SPE J. 14(1), 202–210 (2009)
Volkov, O., Voskov, D.: Effect of time stepping strategy on adjoint-based production optimization. Comput. Geosci. 20(3), 707–722 (2016)
Younis, R.: Modern advances in software and solution algorithms for reservoir simulation. PhD Thesis, Stanford University (2011)
Zhou, Y.: Parallel general-purpose reservoir simulation with coupled reservoir models and multi-segment wells. PhD Thesis, Stanford University (2012)
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the industrial affiliates of the Stanford University Reservoir Simulation Research (SUPRI–B) and Smart Fields Consortia, and the Center for Integrated Operations in the Petroleum Industry, NTNU, for their financial support. We also thank Timur Garipov for useful discussions and suggestions on different aspects of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Volkov, O., Bellout, M.C. Gradient-based production optimization with simulation-based economic constraints. Comput Geosci 21, 1385–1402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9634-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9634-3