Abstract
Reduction in population size and local extinctions have been reported for the yellow-bellied toad, Bombina variegata, but the genetic impact of this is not yet known. In this study, we genotyped 200 individuals, using mtDNA cytochrome b and 11 nuclear microsatellites. We investigated fine-scale population structure and tested for genetic signatures of historical and recent population decline, using several statistical approaches, including likelihood methods and approximate Bayesian computation. Five major genetically divergent groups were found, largely corresponding to geography but with a clear exception of high genetic isolation in a highly touristic area. The effective sizes in the last few generations, as estimated from the random association among markers, never exceeded a few dozen of individuals. Our most important result is that several analyses converge in suggesting that genetic variation was shaped in all groups by a 7- to 45-fold demographic decline, which occurred between a few hundred and a few 1000 years ago. Remarkably, only weak evidence supports recent genetic impact related to human activities. We believe that the alpine B. variegata populations should be monitored and protected to stop their recent decline and to prevent local extinctions, with highest priority given to genetically isolated populations. Nonetheless, current genetic variation pattern, being mostly shaped in earlier times, suggests that complete recovery can be achieved. In general, our study is an example of how the potential for recovery should be inferred even under the co-occurrence of population decline, low genetic variation, and genetic bottleneck signals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Amphibians are among the most threatened vertebrates. Many species from all continents are experiencing a demographic decline (Houlahan et al. 2000), due to multiple causes (Allentoft and O’Brien 2010). Important anthropogenic activities include land use, leading to habitat loss and fragmentation, pollution and indirectly the increase of UV-B irradiation (Weyrauch and Grubb 2006). Also, climate change and global warming affect the distribution of amphibians, influence breeding phenology or lead to pathogen outbreaks (Corn 2005; Rohr et al. 2008). Amphibians appear to be particularly sensitive to all these processes, making them good biological indicators of environmental quality (Blaustein and Wake 1990).
The causes and consequences of amphibian decline, and the utility of this taxon as a biological indicator, cannot be generalized at a global scale. Many factors interact, and their impact likely differs according to geographic areas and focal species (Beebee and Griffiths 2005). Studies at regional scale, where the major factors of habitat disturbance can be identified, the demographic dynamic of a species and its genetic impact can be reconstructed, and the possible causal influences can be inferred, are therefore crucial for understanding, and mitigating, amphibian declines. In this context, the Alpine environment is of particular interest and concern.
The Alpine environment is heavily affected by environmental change, including climate change and land use (Cannone et al. 2008; Vanham et al. 2009; Keiler et al. 2010; Huggel et al. 2010). In particular, temperatures in the European Alps increased in the last century twice as much as the global average increase (Brunetti et al. 2009). Consequences of climate warming, such as the upwards shift of the tree-line (Leonelli et al. 2011), or the change in population genetic structure, have been already demonstrated or predicted in many Alpine plants species (Jay et al. 2012; Moradi et al. 2012). However, few case studies of recent demographic and genetic change are documented in animals (though see for example the decreasing litter size in the marmot, Tafani et al. 2013). Here we analyzed the genetic variation in an amphibian species sampled in the Italian Alps. Our main goal is to estimate the genetic impact, if any, of its recent demographic decline.
In studying influences on genetic patterns, it is always important to consider not only recent but also ancient events in a species’ history. For example, many species have undergone range fluctuations, colonization events, or demographic collapse due to climatic/habitat changes that occurred thousands of years ago. Examples include well-documented northward tree migration after the last glaciation (10,000–20,000 years ago), mid-Holocene hemlock decline, and elephant population contraction due to drying in tropical Africa 4000 years ago (Bhiry and Filion 1996; Hewitt 2000; Okello et al. 2008; Lee-Yaw et al. 2008). Such events have left genetic signatures, and may be the dominant drivers of modern genetic patterns in some species. In other species, it may be shown that the drivers are more recent, as in Iberian lynx (Casas-Marce et al. 2013). Determining whether and how ancient and recent environmental change has influenced population genetic patterns is a key unanswered evolutionary (Andrew et al. 2013) and ecological (Sutherland et al. 2013) question, and whether a species is newly rare or was always rare will also determine the relevant management interventions to be applied (Sgrò et al. 2011).
Recent statistical genetic methods offer the potential to give a more complete understanding of demographic and genetic histories (Andrew et al. 2013), especially when a direct comparison between genetic variation in modern and museum samples (e.g. Rubidge et al. 2012) is not possible. Specifically, improvements in likelihood and simulation-based methods allow comparison of alternative demographic models (e.g. stability, decline) and estimation of parameters regarding historical and contemporary population sizes and timing of major events. These methods are a major improvement on widely-used but simplistic tests of population equilibrium. Use of multiple complementary analyses, and comparing results among them, should help unravel recent and ancient historical fluctuations in effective population size.
The yellow-bellied toad, Bombina variegata, is mainly distributed across central western Europe, from Spain to the Carpathian Mountains (Sillero et al. 2014). Breeding sites are usually ephemeral, and include small puddles in meadows and river loops and occasionally farm ponds or water-filled wheel ruts (Gollmann et al. 1998; Di Cerbo and Ferri 2000; Sillero et al. 2014). Although the species is globally considered of Least Concern by the IUCN (IUCN 2014), extinctions or demographic reductions have been reported in the last decades across the distributional range. In particular, severe declines are documented in Romania, the Netherlands, and Italy (Goverse et al. 2007; Barbieri et al. 2004; Covaciu-Marcov et al. 2010). Only one population is now described in Luxembourg, and the species is probably extinct in Belgium and highly fragmented in France (Kuzmin et al. 2009). Urbanization and consequent loss of suitable habitat (e.g. abandonment of pastures, heavy use of unpaved forestry roads and drainage of natural breeding sites) are considered the major factors reducing the population sizes and increasing the fragmentation in this species. Additionally, chytridiomycosis has been also suggested to be an important cause of population decline at least in the sister species Bombina pachypus (Stagni et al. 2004). As in many amphibians in natural conditions, B. variegata has small effective population size (Beebee and Griffiths 2005) and low dispersal ability (Smith and Green 2005; Hartel 2008), making the genetic and non-genetic risks associated to small numbers of highly isolated individuals even higher.
In Italy, B. variegata was common in the last century (De Betta 1857; Giacomelli 1887; Vandoni 1914), but it is significantly declining in many areas (Stagni et al. 2004). Anthropization of natural habitats, pollution and use of pesticides led to a population decrease in the last decades (Barbieri et al. 2004), fragmentation and local extinctions (Di Cerbo and Ferri 2000). A recent study used simulations, under various models of climate change, environmental alteration and solar irradiation, to predict that the yellow-bellied toad in Italy might lose between 13 and 75 % of its suitable natural habitat in the next 50 years (D’Amen et al. 2011).
Here we study the pattern of genetic variation at the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and at 11 microsatellite markers in a restricted area in the Italian Alps, where recent extinctions and population declines have been confirmed (Caldonazzi et al. 2002). We typed 200 individuals from 9 sites to address two main questions: (1) Does the genetic pattern show evidence of demographic decline and fragmentation, and, if so, (2) can we directly infer that recent human-related factors are responsible for the genetic pattern? We address this question using a set of complementary statistical methods suitable to estimate the effective population sizes and their temporal dynamic, the population structure, the individual genomic compositions and the pattern of isolation by distance, and to probabilistically compare alternative demographic models. Our results have specific implications for the conservation of B. variegata, and provide general guidelines for avoiding over-estimation of extinction risks when genetic data are analysed.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and DNA extraction
We collected 200 samples of B. variegata (toe clips from adults) from nine different localities, representing most of the known breeding populations in the Province of Trento (Northern Italy), from 2009 to 2011. Sampling sites and their abbreviation used throughout this paper are reported in Fig. 1. Different ecosystems were considered: samples from Spiz (SPI) and Monte Baldo (MBA) came from isolated mountain areas (about 1500 m above sea level, asl); samples from Zambana (ZAM) and Mezzolombardo (MEZ) were collected in the main valley of the Region (the Adige valley), close to areas devoted to agriculture (about 210 m asl); samples from Nago (NAG) and Loppio (LOP) came from sites close the touristic area of Garda Lake (160 and 250 m asl, respectively); samples from Verla (VER), Pozzolago (POZ) and Prà (PRA) were collected from scarcely urbanized areas along the Avisio river (from 450 to 620 m asl), and in particular from agricultural ponds (VER) and river loops (POZ and PRA). Individual GPS coordinates of each sample were recorded. Toe clips were obtained and stored in 95 % ethanol; about 20 mg of tissue were used to perform DNA extraction using the protocol of the DNeasy Tissue kit (QIAGEN Inc, Hilden, Germany). All sampling procedures were approved by the Italian Ministry of Environment and the Wildlife Committee of the Autonomous Province of Trento (DPN/2D/2003/2267 and 4940-57/B-09-U265-LS-fd).
Marker genotyping
We initially sequenced a fragment (471 bp) of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytochrome b gene to verify the haplotypic affiliation of the samples, with respect to the known maternal phylogeographic pattern in Europe. We used the primer pairs L14850 and H 15410 according to Tanaka et al. (1994). PCR amplifications were conducted in 20 μl (containing 1 μl of template DNA, 2 μl of 10× buffer, 0.1 μM of each pair of primers, 1 unit of Hot Master Taq polymerase and ultra pure water) under the following conditions: 10 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 52 °C, 60 s at 65 °C, and a final extension step for 10 min at 65 °C. Sequences were edited using Finch TV 1.4.0 (an open source application developed by Geospiza Research Team, http://www.geospiza.com/Products/finchtv.shtml), assembled with Sequencer v.4.7 and aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1997) using default parameters.
The genetic variation level and structure at the local scale were then investigated typing 11 autosomal microsatellites (Table S1, Online Resource) previously isolated in B. variegata or Bombina bombina (Nürnberger et al. 2003; Stuckas and Tiedemann 2006; Hauswaldt et al. 2007). PCR amplifications were conducted in four different multiplex reactions in a final volume of 20 ul containing: 1 μl of template DNA, 2 μl of 10× buffer, 0.05 μM of each pair of primers, 1 unit of Hot Master Taq polymerase (Applied) and ultra-pure water. The amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of the series: 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature (see Table S1, Online Resource) for 30 s, 65 °C for 45 s; then, a final extension step at 65 °C for 10 min. PCR labeled products were run on a four capillary system ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystem) and scored with an internal lane standard (LIZ 500) using GeneMapper software.
Statistical analysis
Mitochondrial DNA
A phylogenetic tree was built using the maximum-likelihood algorithm implemented in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011), using the Kimura two-parameter model (selected as the best model by JModelTest, Posada 2008) and 1000 bootstrap replicates. This analysis included the haplotypes from our study, 361 sequences available in Genbank for B. variegata (EF212448-EF212809), and two sequences used as outgroups from B. bombina and B. orientalis (JF898352, EU531278).
Microsatellites
Microsatellites were tested for the presence of null alleles, allele drop-out and scoring errors using MicroChecker (Van Oosterhout et al. 2004) and FreeNa (Chapuis and Estoup 2007). An outlier analysis was performed with the software Lositan (Antao et al. 2008), running 50,000 simulations, with FDR sets to 0.1, confidence interval of 0.95, sample sizes from 10 to 80, and assuming either an infinite or a stepwise mutation model.
We used GENEPOP 3.4 (Raymond and Rousset 1995) to test for deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for each locus and globally. We also tested genotypic Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) for each pair of loci. To evaluate overall genetic variation, the expected and observed heterozigosity (H e and H o ) and number of alleles (N a ) within each population were calculated using Arlequin v3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010); FSTAT software (Goudet 1995) was used to calculate allelic richness (A r ). In addition, pairwise F st values between populations and their significance were computed with Arlequin v3.5 and the corresponding triangular matrix of distances was visualized using Principal Coordinates analysis (PCoA) implemented in GenAlex v6.5 (Peakall and Smouse 2012). Pairwise distances were also computed using two indices of genetic differentiation that, differently from F st , do not depend on the level of variation within populations: G’ st (Hedrick 2005), and Jost’s D (Jost 2008).
Bayesian clustering analyses
STRUCTURE v2.3.4 (Pritchard et al. 2000; Hubisz et al. 2009) was used to determine the most plausible number K of genetically homogeneous groups and to estimate the genetic composition of each individual. We applied the LOCPRIOR with admixture model, which assumes that sampling locations are informative and allows for mixed ancestry of individuals. This model is more powerful in detecting weak genetic structure and reduces misassignments (Hubisz et al. 2009). We also tested the model where geography is not considered (i.e., LOCPRIOR set to off) to verify that the major features of the genetic structure can be still identified. Each run of STRUCTURE consisted of 1000,000 iterations after a burn-in period of 250,000, and 10 runs were analysed for all K values between 1 and 9. The most probable K was selected comparing the likelihood at different K values and using the approach of Evanno et al. (2005) based on the rate of change of the likelihood.
Genetic vs. geographic distances
The correlation between genetic similarity and geographic distance was evaluated at both individual and population levels. At the individual level, we computed with the software SPAGeDi (Hardy and Vekemans 2002) the kinship coefficient estimator derived by Loiselle et al. (1995) for all pairs of individuals. These coefficients were then pooled in classes with similar number of comparisons, corresponding to different geographic distances. At the population level, we used a Mantel test to analyse the relationship between the linearized F st based distance (F st /(1 − F st )) and the logarithm of the linear geographic distance. Slope and the intercept of the regression line between these two variables were estimated following a reduced major axis regression (RMA) and a jackknife approach over all points (Jensen et al. 2005).
Recent effective population size
Two methods were used to estimate the recent effective population size (N e ) of each population: LDNe (Waples and Do 2008; Do et al. 2014) and ONeSAMP (Tallmon et al. 2008). LDNe is based on the linkage disequilibrium among unlinked loci created by random drift and the estimated N e reflects the population size in the last few generations (Hare et al. 2011). As suggested by the authors (Waples and Do 2008), we excluded the alleles with frequencies smaller than 0.02 to avoid bias related to rare alleles. ONeSAMP implements an approximate Bayesian computation analysis (Beaumont et al. 2002; Bertorelle et al. 2010). Eight summary statistics are used by ONeSAMP to compare observed and simulated data sets; the inclusion of linkage disequilibrium among these statistics makes this method particularly sensitive to recent population sizes (Skrbinsek et al. 2012). The lower and upper limits of the uniform prior distribution of N e were set to 2 and 5000, respectively.
Demographic dynamic
We analysed the demographic dynamic of each population using five approaches: (1) the M-ratio test (Garza and Williamson 2001); (2) the heterozygosity excess test implemented in the software BOTTLENECK 1.2.02 (Piry et al. 1999), (3) a Bayesian analysis based on the coalescent framework and able to estimate the posterior distributions of the parameters of a contraction/expansion demographic model, as implemented in the software MSVAR v1.3 (Beaumont 1999, 2004); (4) a likelihood analysis based on the coalescent framework and specifically designed to infer population size contractions and simultaneously the parameters of the mutation model for microsatellites (as implemented in the software MIGRAINE, Leblois et al. 2014); (5) a model comparison based on the approximate Bayesian computation approach (Beaumont et al. 2002; Bertorelle et al. 2010), as implemented in the software in DIYABC v 1.0.4.46b (Cornuet et al. 2008, 2010). The first two approaches are simple statistical tests of the null hypothesis of demographic stability, while the last three approaches are model-based, and produce parameter estimates and/or model probabilities using most or all the information provided by the data.
Each method has different statistical properties, which depend on the number of markers, the specific feature of the bottleneck (e.g. age, initial population size, intensity, recovery or not) and possible violations of the model they assume (e.g., migration events among populations). Therefore, none can be considered superior to the others in all conditions (e.g. Swatdipong et al. 2010; Chikhi et al. 2010; Peery et al. 2012; Hoban et al. 2013a). We briefly describe these methods, and we will return to their properties in the discussion.
The M-ratio test is based on the frequency distribution of allelic sizes, which is expected to have gaps after a bottleneck due to stochastic loss of rare alleles. Statistical significance was established comparing the observed values with the empirical null distribution obtained simulating 10,000 times the genealogy expected under demographic stability with M_P_VAL (Garza and Williamson 2001). Simulations assume the two-phase mutation model, and require three parameters: the population-mutation parameter, θ = 4Neμ, the mean size of multi-repeat mutations, δ g , and the proportion of multistep events, p s . Different values of θ were tested, i.e. 1, 2, and 5; δ g and p s were fixed to 3.1 and 0.22 as estimated in a recent review by Peery et al. (2012).
The heterozygosity excess test is based on the comparison between heterozygosity and number of alleles, which is predicted to deviate from the expectation after a bottleneck because the former decreases more slowly than the latter. Statistical significance (one tail) is computed using the Wilcoxon’s signed ranked test to compare observed and expected heterozygosities (Cornuet and Luikart 1996), where expected values are computed by simulations assuming again a two phase mutation model, a variance among multiple steps equal to 12 (corresponding to δ g = 3.1, see Peery et al. 2012) and p s = 0.22.
The method implemented in MSVAR assumes that an ancestral population with effective size N 1 , increased or decreased (linearly or exponentially) to its current size N 0 , starting T generations ago. The estimation algorithm is based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations, and the simple Single-step Mutation Model (SMM) is assumed. Simulations were run for 4 × 108 iterations; convergence and posterior distributions of the parameters were evaluated with Tracer v1.5 (Rambaut et al. 2014), after discarding the first 10 % of the chains (burn-in). For each population, three independent runs were performed assuming an exponential demographic change. The possible effect of this choice was tested assuming a linear change in an additional run of the program. Priors means for the ancestral and current population sizes were set equal to a log-10 transformed value of 3 (1000 individuals), with a standard deviation equal to 1. The prior distributions are log-normal, and this setting allows the testing of population sizes from few tens to hundreds of thousands of individuals. Three different prior distributions of the time since the demographic change were tested, with means equal to 2, 3, and 4, respectively (corresponding to 100, 1000, and 10,000 years) and standard deviations equal to 1. The prior distribution of the average mutation rate across loci was set to 1.27 × 10−3 per generation. This value corresponds to the direct measure of the microsatellite mutation rate available for amphibians, as estimated from 7906 allele transfers from parents to offspring in the tiger salamander (Bulut et al. 2009). All the other prior settings in the hierarchical model implemented in MSVAR are reported in Table S2, Online Resource, and follow standard choices used in other studies (e.g. Storz et al. 2002; Goossens et al. 2006).
Considering that MSVAR provides little information on the mutation rate (Girod et al. 2011), but this rate is necessary to convert the scaled parameters θ 0 = 4N 0 μ, θ 1 = 4N 1 μ, and t = T/2N 0 into the natural parameters N 0 , N 1 , and T, we estimated the natural parameters in two different ways: (a) using the posterior distribution of the mutation rate as estimated by MSVAR; and (b) using the posterior distribution of the scaled parameters and subsequently generating the distributions of the natural parameters N 0 , N 1 , and T using either the “amphibian specific” rate = 1.27 × 10−3 or the commonly used rate of 5.0 × 10−4 per generation (Garza and Williamson 2001; Storz et al. 2002). Time estimates are transformed in years assuming a generation time of 3 years (Szymura 1998; Gollmann and Gollmann 2002). Estimates were made on each population separately, and also after pooling populations that are not significantly differentiated.
The same scaled parameters estimated by MSVAR were also estimated with MIGRAINE, a computer package that implement a coalescent method based on importance sampling of gene genealogies (Leblois et al. 2014). Under this method, microsatellites are allowed to mutate under the generalized stepwise mutation model (GSM), which is more realistic for this type of markers and reduces the risk of false positive in bottleneck testing (Peery et al. 2012). Scaled parameters were then converted to natural parameters assuming the “amphibian specific” mutation rate (see above).
Lastly, the demographic dynamic was analysed comparing three alternative scenarios with the ABC (approximate Bayesian computation) approach as implemented in DIYABC (Cornuet et al. 2010): constant effective population size, ancient bottleneck and recent bottleneck. The models assuming ancient or recent reductions were simulated to mimic the demographic effects possibly related to the post-glacial founding of the Alps populations and the human-mediated processes affecting amphibians in the last century, respectively. Hereafter, we call these models Con (constant population size), AnD (ancient post-glacial decline), and ReD (recent, human-related, decline). Ten different settings and prior distributions were tested for each population to check the robustness of the results, for a total of 90 analyses (Table S3, Online Resource). The prior distribution for the mutation rate was set to either uniform from 1 × 10−5 to 5 × 10−3, or gamma shaped with shape parameter equal to 3.2, mean equal to 1.27 × 10−3, and range from 0.01 to 0.0001, thus covering a wide range of plausible values estimated empirically for microsatellites in different species.
Results
Mitochondrial sequences
Three polymorphic sites, and an average pairwise divergence of 0.043 % among individuals, were found in the 420 bp alignment of the cytb gene. Four different haplotypes were detected, three of which had never been observed before in this species. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree (Fig. S1, Online Resource) indicates that the samples we analyzed belong to the previously described “Balkano-Western” clade of the nominal form, Bombina variegata variegata (Hofman et al. 2007).
Microsatellite markers
All 200 samples from 9 populations were successfully genotyped at all 11 amplified loci. MicroChecker and FreeNa results did not suggest any significant presence of null alleles, scoring errors or allelic drop-out. Evidence of selection operating at some marker was not found by the F st outlier method implemented in Lositan. Systematic deviation from Hardy–Weinberg and linkage equilibrium can be excluded: only 5 out of 99 (11 loci × 9 populations) Hardy–Weinberg tests were significant with P < 0.05, and only 2 out of 55 locus pairs showed significant genotypic linkage with P < 0.05, after controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) for multiple testing following Benjamini and Hochberg (1995).
All loci were polymorphic and the number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 for F22 to 11 for Bv32 (Table S1, Online Resource). Genetic variation was relatively low in all populations (Table 1). Heterozygosity values were around 0.50, with lower values in SPI (H e = 0.41) and NAG (H e = 0.34). The allelic richness per locus was between 3 and 4 for most populations, again with SPI and NAG showing the lowest values (2.5 and 2.4, respectively).
Population differentiation
Significant genetic differentiation (after following FDR correction) was found in 34 out 36 pairwise F st comparisons. The only exceptions are the comparisons between two pairs of geographically adjacent populations (ZAM vs. MEZ and PRA vs. POZ). F st values (see Table S4, Online Resource) ranged between 0.05 and 0.15 in most cases, with higher values (up to 0.32) when the NAG site was involved. The matrix of distances is graphically visualized in Fig. 2 using the PCoA. Pairwise distances computed with G’ st and Jost’s D were linearly and highly correlated to F st (R2 equal to 0.99 and 0.98, respectively), with regression coefficients very close to 1 (1.35 and 0.92, respectively), and intercepts very close to 0 (0.016 and 0.012, respectively). The distance matrices based on these two additional measures of differentiation are reported in Table S4, Online Resource. The corresponding PcoA plots (not shown) are virtually identical to that reported in Fig. 2.
Bayesian clustering analyses
The inspection of the likelihood plot for different K values (Fig. S2a, Online Resource), and the plot based on the rate of change of the likelihoods (Supp. Fig. 2b), suggests that the two most relevant partition of the data are those with 2 and with 5 inferred groups. For K = 2, in fact, we observe the highest rate of likelihood change, and for K = 5, the likelihood plot reaches a plateau and a peak in the rate of likelihood change is also observed. Locations are informative (r statistic = 0.04), and when the geographic information is excluded from the model (i.e., LOCPRIOR set to off), K = 5 is the most supported partition, and the same major groups are identified (Fig. S3 and Fig. S4, Online Resource). We discuss therefore here the results obtained for K = 2 and K = 5 using the LOCPRIOR model (see Fig. S5, Online Resource, for all the plots for K = 2 to K = 7).
For K = 2, the inferred groups are predominant in central/northern and southern locations (Fig. S5, Online Resource), respectively. All the individuals in 4 populations can be entirely or almost entirely assigned to the central/northern (PRA, POZ and SPI) or the southern (NAG) groups. Individuals in the other 5 populations show admixed composition with very similar fractions of the two inferred groups within the same locality, suggesting shared ancestry rather than recent admixture (e.g. Jarvis et al. 2012).
For K = 5, the groups inferred by STRUCTURE roughly correspond to the groups graphically identified by the PCoA plot (Fig. 2): from South to North, we can easily identify MBA + LOP, NAG, SPI, ZAM + MEZ, VER + POZ + PRA. In the southern area, NAG is genetically distinct from MBA and LOP, but with a clear portion of shared ancestry with these neighboring localities. Some individuals in NAG also appear as recent hybrids, with ancestors both in NAG and in MBA or LOP. SPI appears as a genetic isolate in the central portion of the sampled area. In the North, two major groups can be identified: one including the two western samples located along the major Adige valley (ZAM and MEZ), and the other grouping the eastern samples at higher altitude along the Avisio side valley (VER, POZ, and PRA). Interestingly, all the individuals in VER, the sampling locality along the side Avisio valley that is closer to the main Adige valley, show large affinity with the southern localities of MBA and LOP.
Genetic vs. geographic distances
The relationship between linearized F st and the logarithm of geographic distance is positive, weak (R2 = 0.07, Fig. S6, Online Resource), and statistically significant (Mantel test, P = 0.04). Estimated kinship coefficients are relatively high (1/16, as among first cousins) when individuals from localities separated by 5 km or less are compared, and very low otherwise (Fig. S7, Online Resource).
Recent effective population sizes
Point estimates of recent effective population sizes are low or very low (Table 1). The maximum value is around 170 individuals for the Loppio population using the LDNe method, but for the same population the estimated size is less than 30 when the ONeSAMP method is applied. All the other values range approximately between 10 and 50, with LDNe producing in most cases larger estimates than ONeSAMP. The confidence intervals have large upper limits in most LDNe estimates, but the posterior distributions of Ne produced by ONeSAMP have very small probabilities for N e > 50.
Demographic dynamic
All the populations have M-ratio values (see Table 2) below the 0.68 threshold usually taken as evidence for a bottleneck (Garza and Williamson 2001). When M-ratios are tested controlling for false positives (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), significant support of the bottleneck (P < 0.05) is found in all populations, the only exception being ZAM and MEZ when the largest values of θ = 5 is assumed. The heterozygosity excess test indicates that heterozygosities are higher than predicted from the number of alleles, as expected after a bottleneck, but this difference is significant only for SPI.
The posterior distributions of ancestral and current population sizes, as estimated directly by MSVAR in each population, have very limited overlap, and, although rather large confidence intervals were found, support a demographic decline in all populations (Fig. 3; Table S5a, Online Resource). Different populations show similar distributions, but considering the point estimates we note that the ratio between ancestral and current median sizes varies approximately between 7 and 45. NAG, MBA, LOP, and SPI show the most extreme reduction (>25 fold), and a less extreme decline is estimated for the other populations (<15 fold). Ancient sizes distributions have peaks at around 1000–2000 individuals, and current sizes estimates vary between 35 and 150 animals in different populations. Only small differences from this pattern are observed assuming either an exponential or a linear decline (Table S5a, Online Resource).
The best supported value for the time when the decline started varies in different populations between 250 and 1500 years before present (BP) when the exponential decline was assumed (see Fig. 4a; Table S5a, Online Resource) and between 500 and 3000 years BP when the linear decline was assumed. Given the evident overlap between prior and posterior distributions, we checked the influence of the former on the latter by performing additional tests with different priors. The posterior distributions support a decline starting point between few hundred and few 1000 years even when the prior mean was decreased or increased by a factor of 10 (see Fig. 4b, c).
All these general results of MSVAR are consistent across runs and when scaled, instead of natural, parameters are estimated, or when samples from pairs of populations not genetically differentiated were pooled to increase the sample size (Table S5a, b, Online Resource). On the contrary, population sizes and decline age estimates are approximately doubled if the “generic” mutation rate is used instead of the “amphibian specific” rate is used to convert scaled into natural parameters (Table S5c, Online Resource). Credible intervals and median values of the posterior distributions estimated in different MSVAR analyses are all reported in. Tables S5, Online Resource.
When population size and the time since the population started to decline are estimated with the method implemented in MIGRAINE, thus allowing for multiple steps in the mutation process, the general conclusions reflect those produced by MSVAR, with some differences in the parameter estimates (Table S6, Online Resource). Modern but especially ancestral sizes are larger, varying among different populations between 50 and 400, and 5000 and 15,000, respectively, and thus increasing the estimated intensity of the decline. The beginning of the decline, on the contrary, is almost the same as estimated by MSVAR, ranging between 600 and 3500 years.
The results of the ABC analysis are clearly affected by the priors setting, but, overall, the evidence against demographic stability (Con model) is strong and the model AnD (ancient post-glacial decline) appears the most plausible to explain the pattern of genetic variation (Fig. 5; Table S3, Online Resource). However, it is also important to note that in 9 out of 90 analyses performed under different priors setting (10 for each population), the posterior probability of ReD (recent decline, human related) was higher than the probability of AnD. This situation occurred only for three populations, MEZ (once), NAG (5 times) and SPI (3 times), and can be visualized by the overlap of probability ranges for AnD and ReD reported in Fig. 5. The results of the complete set of ABC analyses are reported in Table S3, Online Resource.
Discussion
This study was motivated by the recent demographic decline and habitat change and fragmentation observed in multiple Alpine population of the yellow-bellied toad (Caldonazzi et al. 2002). Considering the heightened susceptibility of this mountain environment to ongoing increase of temperatures, our main goal was to understand whether or not recent demographic and habitat change had already produced negative genetic effects in terms of variation levels, within and between populations, and inbreeding. After a preliminary phylogeographic analysis based on cytochrome b sequences, we addressed this main question typing 11 nuclear microsatellites in 200 individuals from 9 populations. In general, the data supported a genetic bottleneck occurring in the past, and we dedicated particular attention in the statistical analysis to estimate the timing of this event. We clearly show that ancient reductions of genetic variation likely occurred in this species, but a recent and recorded demographic decline, possibly associated to human activities, did not leave a significant genetic signature. Therefore the conservation situation may be optimistic, due to possibly ancient purging effects and adaptation occurring in many generations at low density, and also the lack (as yet) of human impacts.
Phylogeographic affiliation
The phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial sequences showed that all samples included in this study fall in the Balkan-Western clade (Supp. Fig. 1). The level of variation in our sample was very low, with 89 % of the individuals sharing the same mtDNA sequence, and only 4 haplotypes in total. This result agrees with previous studies suggesting a severe reduction of variation in the Western areas of the distributions (Hofman et al. 2007; Fijarczyk et al. 2011). This data also and supports the hypothesis that the populations characterized by this clade originated in a Balkan refugium and expanded northwestward after the last glaciation, losing genetic variation during the colonization process, similar to results shown in the moor frog, Rana arvalis (Babik et al. 2004).. Further statistical analyses at this marker were not possible, as only thee polymorphic sites were observed.
Nuclear variation and estimates of contemporary Ne and kinship
Microsatellite markers confirmed that genetic variation levels are very low in at least two Alpine populations (NAG and SPI), and in general lower than observed in comparable populations of this species or the sister species B. bombina. When samples sizes are adjusted to be equal by resampling, and only the loci shared among studies are considered, the average number of alleles was about 27 and 40 % lower in the Alps than in a B. variegata and B. bombina population in Northern Germany, respectively (Hauswaldt et al. 2007). The number of alleles and the heterozygosities are similar to the values found in endangered frog or toad species (e.g. Morgan et al. 2008; Beauclerc et al. 2010; Wang 2012; Igawa et al. 2013). If compared to large collections of heterozygosity values observed in both endangered and non-endangered species (e.g. Frankham et al. 2010; Hughes 2010), the average level of genetic variation in B. variegata populations should be probably considered “medium–low”. For example, the average value of heterozygosity observed in the Alpine toad populations, 0.47, correspond to the 10th and 30th percentile in two lists of 221 non-endangered and 73 endangered or vulnerable bird species, respectively (Hughes 2010).
Low genetic variation in modern samples may be produced by different demographic scenarios, including low and constant census size, recent bottlenecks, and even in recently large and expanding populations when mutations have not the time to accumulate yet. As a first step, our analyses excluded the last scenario (expansion), specifically our estimation of effective contemporary population size using the linkage disequilibrium pattern among physically unlinked markers, and the ABC-based OneSAMP method. Most populations showed values smaller than 50 individuals, and some of them values smaller than 20. These values are lower than those estimated in other ranid species (Wilkinson et al. 2007; Phillipsen et al. 2011), and similar to the estimates obtained in endangered anuran species (Ficetola et al. 2010; Wang 2012). We conclude therefore that these yellow-bellied toad populations have today relatively low genetic variation and evolutionary potential, with high risk of local extinction due to demographic stochasticity, considering the very limited number of breeders. Inbreeding within populations or between individuals sampled at very short geographic distances is probably unavoidable in this condition, as suggested by the kinship coefficients estimated in this study, but the negative effects in terms of individual fitness is not easily predictable (see below) and should be directly evaluated.
Genetic structure
Gene flow, which could counteract the loss of variation and inbreeding in small populations, is unlikely to occur in a fragmented landscape and especially in species with reduced movement capabilities such as frogs (e.g., Dolgener et al. 2012; Igawa et al. 2013). In particular, most of the sample sites in our study are separated by highly urbanized areas, and a previous mark-recapture field study in B. variegata showed that travel distances covered each year by adults or subadults rarely exceed 500 m (Hartel 2008). As expected, a clear evidence of genetic substructure was found, and only two pairs of populations, separated by less than 7 km, were not genetically differentiated between them. Genetic distances were substantial, which was observed using both classical Wright’s F st and more recently developed metrics for multi-allelic markers, Jost’s D and Hedrick’s G’ st . This result is not unexpected and it suggests that when genetic variation is medium to low, Wright’s F st is suitable for any type of marker.
Five major genetic groups were identified, with two of them corresponding to two single and highly divergent populations (NAG and SPI), and the others associated to geographically homogenous areas. Genetic data also showed that kinship levels are high only at very short distances. Overall, these results indicate that gene flow among local small populations is limited, and rapidly decreases as the geographic distance increases.
The population of NAG showed the highest values of Fst (from 0.15 to 0.32). In this case, although one sampled area (LOP) is very close, gene flow is probably prevented because of habitat discontinuity due to urbanization in the touristic area of Garda Lake. Interestingly, NAG is also the only population where clear signals of recent admixture with the neighboring populations were found in some individuals. Future investigations should be performed to test the hypothesis of human-mediated translocation events.
Newly rare or always rare?
Small local population size can occur at demographic equilibrium, i.e. a natural and stable condition reached in patchy habitats by species with limited dispersal, or can result from recent demographic decline. Field studies in B. variegate suggest recent demographic decline, and genetic evidence suggest small effective sizes and fragmentation. But can we directly infer that recent decline is the cause of the low genetic variation? In other words, given that field studies indicate that the demographic equilibrium has been recently perturbed, can we also conclude that the genetic variation pattern has also been recently perturbed? Answering this question is clearly relevant in terms of conservation actions, since the dual threat, demographic and genetic, should be considered a much higher concern, as a likely step further in the extinction vortex (Lankau and Strauss 2011). If, on the contrary, the recent demographic decline is not the cause of the current genetic pattern, milder measures of protection could be sufficient to favor demographic re-expansion, and prevent the beginning of genetic erosion. Therefore we dedicated a large effort to estimate the genetic impact of the recent demographic decline.
Five approaches were used. Two of them, the M-ratio and the heterozygosity excess tests, are classical statistical tests that test whether simple properties of the observed data are compatible with what is expected under the null hypothesis of demographic stability. The genetic data appear mostly incompatible with demographic stability. In almost all the analyses and populations, the M-ratio strongly supports a demographic bottleneck. Considering that the power of this test is reasonably high when a bottleneck occurs in an isolated population between few (Peery et al. 2012, Hoban et al. 2013a) and few hundreds (Garza and Williamson 2001; Swatdipong et al. 2010) generations, it might be inferred that our data are compatible with a recent decline. However, it has been shown by simulation that even relatively low migration rates (m = 0.001) can extend the time frame of the bottleneck signal based on the M-ratio to several thousand of generations (Swatdipong et al. 2010). A significant excess of heterozygosity compared to value expected from the number of alleles was observed only in three populations (one after the multiple test correction). Considering that the heterozygosity excess is a transitory event rarely extending more than 50 or approximately 0.5–4 Ne generations (Cornuet and Luikart 1996; Henry et al. 2009; Peery et al. 2012), and in general a shorter time compared to the gap in the allelic size distribution contributing to the M-ratio (Spear et al. 2006; Hundertmark and Van Daele 2009; Marshall et al. 2009), these results can be considered as a statistically weak and unconvincing evidence of recent decline, with stronger support on ancient declines.
The above inference based on the temporal power window of the M-ratio (older bottlenecks) and the heterozygosity excess test (younger ones) is speculative, though not uncommon in the literature (e.g. Spear et al. 2006; Lumibao and McLachlan 2014). More robust and direct evidence on the age and the intensity of the bottleneck can be obtained, as shown by simulation and empirical studies (Girod et al. 2011; Peery et al. 2012) when the demography is modeled and the whole information contained in the data is used (rather than one summary statistic). Here we used the model-based methods implemented in MSVAR, MIGRAINE, and DIYABC; all these methods clearly support the hypothesis of a non-recent demographic decline in all the populations. In particular, MSVAR and MIGRAINE indicated that the demographic decline most likely started not later than approximately 250 year ago, and not earlier than approximately 3500 years ago. In other words, these estimates point to a decline predating the currently documented human-induced changes, and postdating the most recent complete deglaciation and climate stability reached about 10,000 years ago (Cusinato and Bassetti 2007), when several plant and animal species had probably re-colonized the Alpine area of our study. These two values, 250 and 3500 years before present, correspond to the range of median values estimated in different populations, but considering that the support intervals are rather large and also that the main genetic impact in all these close Alpine populations is probably related to a shared demographic dynamic, we can prudently take them as an estimate of the temporal boundaries of a population size change. We prefer here not to speculate on which historical or environmental factor that may have caused this decline, since the time interval is quite large and it may even reflect an average between the ages of two or more independent declines (Sharma et al. 2012). The clear inference is that the genetic impact of the population decline recently observed in field studies, if any, is limited and surpassed by the impact of a much older decline. A study in salamanders in North America also suggested a decline some thousands of years ago (Jordan et al. 2008).
Population sizes dropped by at least one order of magnitude. Some differences can be detected among populations, but the support intervals of the estimates are large: the only safe conclusion appears that the decline was more intense in the most southern populations of Nago, Monte Baldo, Loppio, and Spiz. Only in these populations, in fact, the estimated ratio between ancient and current size was at least as large, or larger than 25. Finally, when three explicit models were compared using the ABC approach, the highest posterior probabilities always favored, with the exception of a few analyses in Nago and Spiz, an ancient demographic decline, i.e. a decline occurring at least 200 years ago but probably in more ancient times. The fact that similar results were found in all the populations, especially regarding the time and strength of decline, suggests a range-wide rather than localized influence.
Caveats to our demographic dynamic inference
Statistical testing and parameter estimation imply of course assumptions that, when violated, may produce biased results. Direction and magnitude of the bias are difficult to predict in different conditions and for different approaches, but some general notes regarding the robustness of our results can be drawn. (1) Population structure may produce false bottleneck signals in MSVAR (Chikhi et al. 2010) and probably in all coalescent-based methods (e.g. Wakeley 1999; Heller et al. 2013). Following the empirical suggestions by Chikhi et al. 2010 and Heller et al. 2013, we repeated the MSVAR analysis in two data sets created sampling either 3 or 10 individuals per population. This approach is likely to reduce the power to detect bottleneck occurring only in some populations, but can be used to exclude that population structure is the only responsible of the bottleneck inference. The ratio between the estimated ancient and modern population sizes was very close to 5 in both analyses, suggesting that a real decline occurred in the Alpine populations we considered. (2) Rare alleles may go undetected in small samples, thus producing gaps in the allelic size distribution and false signals of bottlenecks in the M ratio. This effect is probably small in our case, since the M ratio remains small and significant when genetically similar samples (MEZ + ZAM and PRA + POZ) are pooled, or when the whole data set is jointly analyzed. (3) When only few individuals contribute to the next generation, and the vast majority does not, i.e. when the variance in reproductive success is high, false signals of bottleneck may emerge in stable populations (Hoban et al. 2013b). Direct measure of the variance in reproductive success are not available for B. variegata, but we know that the vast majority of females reproduce and the number of eggs per clutch is relatively small (Barandun et al. 1997), and also that the likely mating system in this species probably allows many males to fertilize eggs (Sanderson et al. 1992; Vines 2003). It seems therefore unlikely that large variance in reproductive success is the cause of our results. (4) Wrong mutation models and rates, and a wrong generation time, obviously introduce bias in inference and estimates. Most of the methods applied here used a microsatellite-specific multistep mutation model, a mutation rate based on the only direct estimate known for an amphibian (1.27 × 10−3), and a generation time estimated for B. variegata (3 years). Estimates of population sizes and times since the beginning of the inferred decline increase by applying the slightly slower “generic” rate commonly used for this type of markers in non-amphibian species (5.0 × 10−4), or by increasing the generation time to the value of 5 years estimated in some populations of the related species B. bombina (Vines et al. 2003; Fog et al. 2011). Nevertheless, the major conclusions of this study, i.e. that the recent population decline is not the main responsible for the observed genetic variation pattern, remains robust, and this is true even increasing the mutation rate to very large and uncommon values of 2 to 4 × 10−3 per generation (Peery et al. 2012). (5) Bottleneck detection and estimation is based on the assumption that only one demographic event occurred in the past. This is an oversimplification of the real history of a population, but it is unclear how multiple events (e.g. sequential bottlenecks) can affect these analyses (Goossens et al. 2006; Okello et al. 2008; Sharma et al. 2012). More simulation studies (Hoban et al. 2012) are required to better understand the behavior of these methods under complex demographic scenarios including “multi-events” models, necessarily requiring several parameters. Highly informative genomic data sets, such as large panels of SNPs or whole genomes, could be used in such situations.
Conservation issues and actions
Protecting B. variegata populations where demographic reductions have been documented, and possibly favoring a demographic increase, is important to prevent further genetic variation erosion. As shown also in a recent simulation study, much of the variation can be preserved if quick action is implemented (Hoban et al. 2014). However, since the current level of genetic variation in most of the populations we analyzed is not extremely low, and the genetic impact of the recent decline, if any, appears limited, some optimism regarding the possibility of a complete recovery without risks of negative genetic consequences is justified. Our results do not clearly indicate a specific environmental situation where, in general, conservation efforts should be focused, and even some recent studies based on non-genetic data suggest that this question has not a simple answer. Hartel and von Wehrden (2013), in fact, found that traditional farming practices produce a large number of suitable ponds and should be preserved, but Scheele et al. (2014) observed that the pasture ponds, compared to those in forest, tend to host individuals in worse body conditions. However, our study does show that highest priority might be given to the populations of Spiz and Nago, since they showed lowest values of diversity, clear evidence of extreme contraction of effective population size, and some (weak) evidence of the genetic impact of a recent decline. Spiz is one of the two highly isolated populations in our study located at high altitude, where the negative effects of global warming may additionally increase the risk of local extinction. In fact, if early breeding is commonly associated with increasing temperature (Blaustein et al. 2001), the increased probability of late frosts can have fatal consequences on early-bred spawn (Henle et al. 2008). Nago is located in a high tourism area, where anthropogenic disturbance may be impactful. Interestingly, some signature of the recent introduction of individuals from other areas has been found in Nago, and it would be useful to determine if this migration (likely due to human releases) could have inadvertently, but positively, reduced the risk of inbreeding in this highly homogenous and genetically isolated population.
References
Allentoft ME, O’Brien J (2010) Global amphibian declines, loss of genetic diversity and fitness: a review. Diversity 2:47–71
Andrew RL, Bernatchez L, Bonin A, Buerkle CA, Carstens BC, Emerson BC, Garant D, Giraud T, Kane NC, Rogers SM, Slate J, Smith H, Sork VL, Stone GN, Vines TH, Waits L, Widmer A, Rieseberg LH (2013) A road map for molecular ecology. Mol Ecol 22:2605–2626
Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinform 9:323
Babik W, Branicki W, Sandera M, Litvinchuk S, Borkin LJ, Irwin JT, Rafiński J (2004) Mitochondrial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Mol Ecol 13:1469–1480
Barandun J, Reyer H, Anholt B (1997) Reproductive ecology of Bombina variegata: aspects of life history. Amphib-Reptil 18:347–355
Barbieri F, Bernini F, Guarino FM, Venchi A (2004) Distribution and conservation status of Bombina variegata in Italy (Amphibia, Bombinatoridae). Ital J Zool 71:83–90
Beauclerc KB, Johnson B, White BN (2010) Genetic rescue of an inbred captive population of the critically endangered Puerto Rican crested toad (Peltophryne lemur) by mixing lineages. Conserv Genet 11:21–32
Beaumont MA (1999) Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics 153:2013–2029
Beaumont MA, Zhang WY, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025–2035
Beaumont MA (2004) Msvar 1.3 readme [Documentation file, draft]. http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/~mab/stuff/
Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA (2005) The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv 125:271–285
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300
Bertorelle G, Benazzo A, Mona S (2010) ABC as a flexible framework to estimate demography over space and time: some cons, many pros. Mol Ecol 19:2609–2625
Bhiry N, Filion L (1996) Mid-holocene hemlock decline in Eastern North America linked with phytophagous insect activity. Quat Res 45:312–320
Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990) Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon. Trends Ecol Evol 5:203–204
Blaustein AR, Belden LK, Olson DH, Green DM, Root TL, Kiesecker JM (2001) Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conserv Biol 15:1804–1809
Brunetti M, Lentini G, Maugeri M et al (2009) Climate variability and change in the Greater Alpine Region over the last two centuries based on multi-variable analysis. Int J Climatol 29:2197–2225
Bulut Z, McCormick CR, Gopurenko D, Williams RN, Bos DH, DeWoody JA (2009) Microsatellite mutation rates in the eastern tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum) differ 10-fold across loci. Genetica 136:501–504
Caldonazzi M, Pedrini P, Zanghellini S (2002) Atlante degli anfibi e dei rettili della provincia di Trento (Amphibia, Reptilia). 1987–1996 con aggiornamento al 2001. Studi Trent Sci Nat Acta Biol 77:1–165
Cannone N, Diolaiuti G, Guglielmin M, Smiraglia C (2008) Accelerating climate change impacts on alpine glacier forefield ecosystems in the European Alps. Ecol Appl 18:637–648
Casas-Marce M, Soriano L, Lopez-Bao JV, Godoy JA (2013) Genetics at the verge of extinction: insights from the Iberian lynx. Mol Ecol 22:5503–5515
Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631
Chikhi L, Sousa VC, Luisi P, Goossens B, Beaumont MA (2010) The confounding effects of population structure, genetic diversity and the sampling scheme on the detection and quantification of population size changes. Genetics 186:983–995
Corn PS (2005) Climate change and amphibians. Anim Biodiv Conserv 28:59–67
Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and evaluation of two tests for detecting recent bottlenecks. Genetics 144:2001–2014
Cornuet JM, Ravigné V, Estoup A (2010) Inference on population history and model checking using DNA sequence and microsatellite data with the software DIYABC (v1.0). BMC Bioinform 11:401
Cornuet JM, Santos F, Beaumont MA, Robert CP, Marin JM, Blading DJ, Guillemaud T, Estoup A (2008) Inferring population history with DIYABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics 24:2713–2719
Covaciu-Marcov SD, Ferenti S, Dobre F, Ccondure N (2010) Research upon some Bombina variegata populations (Amphibia) from Jiu Gorge National Park, Romania. Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi Comun. Ştiinţele Naturii 26:171–176
Cusinato A, Bassetti M (2007) Popolamento umano e paleoambiente tra la culminazione dell’ ultima glaciazione e l’ inizio dell’ Olocene in area trentina e zone limitrofe. Studi Trent Sci Nat Acta Geol 82:43–63
D’Amen M, Bombi P, Pearman PB, Schmatz DR, Zimmermann NE, Bologna MA (2011) Will climate change reduce the efficacy of protected areas for amphibian conservation in Italy? Biol Conserv 144:989–997
De Betta E (1857) Erpetologia delle Provincie venete e del Tiralo meridionale. Atti e Mem Dell’accademia Di Agric Sci E Lett Di Verona 35:1–365
Di Cerbo A, Ferri V (2000) La conservazione di Bombina variegata variegata. (Linnaeus, 1758) in Lombardia. Atti del I Congr Nazionale della Soc Herpetol Ital, Museo Reg Sci Nat di Torino pp 713–720
Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (N e ) from genetic data. Mol Ecol 14:209–214
Dolgener N, Schröder C, Schneeweiss N, Tiedmann R (2012) Genetic population structure of the Fire-bellied toad Bombina bombina in an area of high population density: implications for conservation. Hydrobiologia 689:111–120
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567
Ficetola GF, Padoa-Schioppa E, Wang J, Garner TWJ (2010) Polygyny, census and effective population size in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Anim Conserv 13:82–89
Fijarczyk A, Nadachowska K, Hofman S, Litvinchuk SN, Babik W, Stuglik M, Gollmann G, Choleva L, Cogălniceanu D, Vukov T, Džukić G, Szymura JM (2011) Nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeography of the European fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and Bombina variegata supports their independent histories. Mol Ecol 20:3381–3398
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fog K, Drews H, Bibelriehter F, Damm N, Briggs L (2011) Managing Bombina bombina in the Baltic region. Best practice guidelines. Life-Nature Project Life04NAT/DE/000028
Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318
Giacomelli P (1887) Erpetologia orobica. Materiali per una fauna della provincia di Bergamo. Estremi degli Atti dell’Ateneo 13:1–37
Girod C, Vitalis R, Leblois R, Fréville H (2011) Inferring population decline and expansion from microsatellite data: a simulation-based evaluation of the Msvar method. Genetics 188:165–179
Gollmann B, Gollmann G (2002) Die Gelbbauchunke. Von der Suhle zur Radspur. Laurenti-Verlag, Bielefeld
Gollmann G, Gollmann B, Baumgartner C (1998) Oviposition of yellow bellied toads Bombina variegata in contrasting water bodies. In: Miaud C, Guyetant R (eds) Le Burget du Lac, SEH pp 139–145
Goossens B, Chikhi L, Ancrenaz M, Ancrenaz-Lackman I, Andau P, Bruford MW (2006) Genetic signature of anthropogenic population collapse in orang-utans. Plos Biol 4:e25
Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486
Goverse E, Smit G, Van Der Meij T (2007) 10 years of amphibian monitoring in the Netherlands: preliminary results. 14th European Congress of Herpetology, Porto
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620
Hare MP, Nunney L, Schwartz MK, Ruzzante DE, Burford M, Waples RS, Ruegg K, Palstra F (2011) Understanding and estimating effective population size for practical application in marine species management. Conserv Biol 25:438–449
Hartel T (2008) Movement activity in a Bombina variegata population from a deciduous forested landscape. North-West J Zool 4:79–90
Hartel T, Wehrdenvon H (2013) Farmed areas predict the distribution of amphibian ponds in a traditional rural landscape. Plos One 8:63649
Hauswaldt JS, Schröder C, Tiedemann R (2007) Nine tetranucleotide microsatellite loci for the European fire-bellied toad (Bombina bombina). Mol Ecol Notes 7:49–52
Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638
Heller R, Chikhi L, Siegismund HR (2013) The confounding effect of population structure on Bayesian skyline plot inferences of demographic history. Plos One 8:e62992
Henle K, Dick D, Harpke A, Kühn I, Schweiger O, Settele J (2008) Climate change impacts on European amphibians and reptiles. Biodiversity and climate change: Reports and guidance developed under the Bern Convention. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, pp 225–305
Henry P, Miquelle D, Sugimoto T, McCullough DR, Caccone A, Russello MA (2009) In situ population structure and ex situ representation of the endangered Amur tiger. Mol Ecol 18:3173–3184
Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913
Hoban S, Bertorelle G, Gaggiotti OE (2012) Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics. Nat Rev Genet 13:110–122
Hoban S, Gaggiotti OE, Bertorelle G (2013a) The number of markers and samples needed for detecting bottlenecks under realistic scenarios, with and without recovery: a simulation-based study. Mol Ecol 22:3444–3450
Hoban S, Mezzavilla M, Gaggiotti OE, Benazzo A, Van Oosterhout C, Bertorelle G (2013b) High variance in reproductive success generates a false signature of a genetic bottleneck in populations of constant size: a simulation study. BMC Bioinform 14:309
Hoban S, Arntzen JA, Bruford MW, Godoy JA, Rus Hoelzel A, Segelbacher G, Vilà C, Bertorelle G (2014) Comparative evaluation of potential indicators and temporal sampling protocols for monitoring genetic erosion. Evol Appl 7:984–998
Hofman S, Spolsky C, Uzzell T, Cogalniceanu D, Babik W, Szymura JM (2007) Phylogeography of the fire-bellied toads Bombina: independent Pleistocene histories inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Mol Ecol 16:2301–2316
Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer DR, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404:752–755
Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Res 9:1322–1332
Huggel C, Salzmann N, Allen S, Caplan-Auerbach J, Fischer L, Haeberli W, Larsen C, Schneider D, Wessels R (2010) Recent and future warm extreme events and high-mountain slope failures. Philos T R Soc A 368:2435–2459
Hughes AL (2010) Reduced microsatellite heterozygosity in island endemics supports the role of long-term effective population size in avian microsatellite diversity. Genetica 138:1271–1276
Hundertmark KJ, Van Daele LJ (2009) Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk. Conserv Genet 11:139–147
Igawa T, Oumi S, Katsuren S, Sumida M (2013) Population structure and landscape genetics of two endangered frog species of Genus Odorrana: different scenarios on two islands. Heredity 110:46–56
IUCN (2014) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.3
Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet 6:13
Jarvis JP, Scheinfeldt LB, Soi S, Lambert C, Omberg L, Ferwerda B, Froment A, Bodo JM, Beggs W, Hoffman G, Mezey J, Tishkoff SA (2012) Patterns of ancestry, signatures of natural selection, and genetic association with stature in Western African Pygmies. Plos Genet 8:e1002641
Jay F, Manel S, Alvarez N, Durand EY, Thuiller W, Holderegger R, Taberlet P, François O (2012) Forecasting changes in population genetic structure of alpine plants in response to global warming. Mol Ecol 21:2354–2368
Jordan M, Morris D, Gibson S (2008) The influence of historical landscape change on genetic variation and population structure of a terrestrial salamander (Plethodon cinereus). Conserv Genet 10:1647–1658
Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026
Keiler M, Knight J, Harrison S (2010) Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps. Philos T R Soc A 368:2461–2479
Kuzmin S, Denoël M, Anthony B, Andreone F, Schmidt B, Ogrodowczyk A, Ogielska M, Vogrin M, Cogalniceanu D, Kovács T, Kiss I, Puky M, Vörös J, Tarkhnishvili D, Ananjeva N (2009) Bombina variegata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3
Lankau RA, Strauss SY (2011) Newly rare or newly common: evolutionary feedbacks through changes in population density and relative species abundance, and their management implications. Evol Appl 4:338–353
Leblois R, Pudlo P, Néron J, Bertaux F, Beeravolu CR, Vitalis R, Rousset F (2014) Maximum-likelihood inference of population size contractions from microsatellite data. Mol Biol Evol 31:2805–2823
Lee-Yaw JA, Irwin JT, Green DM (2008) Postglacial range expansion from northern refugia by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Mol Ecol 17:867–884
Leonelli G, Pelfini M, Morra di Cella U, Garavaglia V (2011) Climate warming and the recent treeline shift in the European Alps: the role of geomorphological factors in high-altitude sites. Ambio 40:264–273
Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82:1420–1425
Lumibao C, McLachlan JS (2014) Habitat differences influence genetic impacts of human land use on the American Beech (Fagus grandifolia). J Hered 105:793–805
Marshall J, Kingsbury B, Minchella D (2009) Microsatellite variation, population structure, and bottlenecks in the threatened copperbelly water snake. Conserv Genet 10:465–476
Moradi H, Fakheran S, Peintinger M, Bergamini A, Schmid B, Joshi J (2012) Profiteers of environmental change in the Swiss Alps: increase of thermophilous and generalist plants in wetland ecosystems within the last 10 years. Alp Bot 122:45–56
Morgan MJ, Hunter D, Pietsch R, Osborne W, Keough JS (2008) Assessment of genetic diversity in the critically endangered Australian corroboree frogs, Pseudophryne corroboree and Pseudophryne pengilleyi, identifies four evolutionary significant units for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:3448–3463
Nürnberger B, Hofman S, Förg-Brey B, Praetzel G, Maclean A, Szymura JM, Abbott CM, Barton NH (2003) A linkage map for the hybridising toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata (Anura: Discoglossidae). Heredity 91:136–142
Okello JBA, Wittemeyer G, Rasmussen HB, Arctander P, Nyakaana S, Douglas-Hamilton I, Siegismund HR (2008) Effective population size dynamics reveal impacts of historic climate events and recent anthropogenic pressure in African elephants. Mol Ecol 17:3788–3799
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Peery MZ, Kirby R, Reid BN, Stoelting R, Doucet-Beer E, Robinson S, Vasquez-Carrillo C, Pauli JN, Palsbøll PJ (2012) Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol Ecol 21:3403–3418
Phillipsen IC, Funk WC, Hoffman EA, Monsen KJ, Blouin MS (2011) Comparative analysis of effective population size within and among species: ranid frogs as a case study. Evolution 65:2927–2945
Piry SG, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503
Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2014) Tracer v1.6. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2), population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249
Rohr JR, Raffel TR, Romansic JM, McCallum H, Hudson PJ (2008) Evaluating the links between climate, disease spread, and amphibian declines. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17436–17441
Rubidge EM, Patton JL, Lim M, Burton AC, Brachares JS, Moritz C (2012) Climate-induced range contraction drives genetic erosion in an alpine mammal. Nat Clim Change 2:285–288
Sanderson N, Szymura JM, Barton NH (1992) Variation in mating call across the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 46:595–607
Scheele BC, Boyd CE, Fischer J, Fletcher AW, Hanspach J, Hartel T (2014) Identifying core habitat before it’s too late: the case of Bombina variegata, an internationally endangered amphibian. Biodivers Conserv 23:775–780
Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann A (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4:326–337
Sharma R, Arora N, Goossens B, Nater A, Morf N, Salmona J, Bruford MW, Van Schaik CP, Krützen M, Chikhi L (2012) Effective population size dynamics and the demographic collapse of Bornean orang-utans. Plos One 7:e49429
Sillero N, Campos J, Bonardi A, Corti C, Creemers R, Crochet P, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Denoël M, Ficetola GF, Gonçalves J, Kuzmin S, Lymberakis P, Pous P, Rodríguez A, Sindaco R, Speybroeck J, Toxopeus B, Vieites DR, Vences M (2014) Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphib-Reptil 35:1–31
Skrbinsek T, Jelenic M, Waits L, Kos I, Jerina K, Trontelj P (2012) Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches. Mol Ecol 21:862–875
Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128
Spear SF, Peterson CR, Matocq MD, Storfer A (2006) Molecular evidence for historical and recent population size reductions of tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) in Yellowstone National Park. Conserv Genet 7:605–611
Stagni G, Dall’olio R, Fusini U, Mazzotti S, Scoccianti C, Serra A (2004) Declining populations of apennine yellow-bellied toad Bombina pachypus in the northern Apennines (Italy): Is Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis the main cause? Ital J Zool 71:151–154
Storz JF, Beaumont MA, Alberts SC (2002) Genetic evidence for long-term population decline in a savannah-dwelling primate: inferences from a hierarchical Bayesian model. Mol Biol Evol 19:1981–1990
Stuckas H, Tiedemann R (2006) Eight new microsatellite loci for the critically endangered fire-bellied toad Bombina bombina and their cross-species applicability among anurans. Mol Ecol Notes 6:150–152
Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HC, Beissinger SR, Benton T, Cameron DD, Carmel Y, Coomes DA, Coulson T, Emmerson MC, Hails RS, Hays GC, Hodgson DJ, Hutchings MJ, Johnson D, Jones JPG, Keeling MJ, Kokko H, Kunin WE, Lambin X, Lewis OT, Malhi Y, Mieszkowska N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Norris K, Phillimore AB, Purves DW, Reid JM, Reuman DC, Thompson K, Travis JMJ, Turnbull LA, Wardle DA, Wiegand T (2013) Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol 101:58–67
Swatdipong A, Primmer CR, Vasemägi A (2010) Historical and recent genetic bottlenecks in European grayling Thymallus thymallus. Conserv Genet 11:279–292
Szymura C (1998) Origin of the yellow-bellied toad population, Bombina variegata, from Goritzhain in Saxony. Herpetol J 8:201–205
Tafani M, Cohas A, Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Allainé D (2013) Decreasing litter size of marmots over time: a life-history response to climate change? Ecology 94:580–586
Tallmon DA, Koyuk A, Luikart GH, Beaumont MA (2008) ONeSAMP: a program to estimate effective population size using approximate Bayesian computation. Mol Ecol Res 8:299–301
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Tanaka T, Matsui M, Takenaka O (1994) Estimation of phylogenetic relationships among Japanese Brown frogs from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (Amphibia: anura). Zool Sci 11:753–757
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538
Vandoni C (1914) Gli anfìbi d’Italia. Hoepli, Milano
Vanham D, Fleischhacker E, Rauch W (2009) Impact of snowmaking on alpine water resources management under present and climate change conditions. Water Sci Technol 59:1793–1801
Vines TH (2003) Migration, habitat choice and assortative mating in a Bombina hybrid zone. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh
Vines TH, Köhler SC, Thiel M, Ghira I, Sands TR, MacCallum CJ, Barton NH, Nürnberger B (2003) The maintenance of reproductive isolation in a mosaic hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 57:1876–1888
Wakeley J (1999) Non-equilibrium migration in human history. Genetics 153:1836–1871
Wang IJ (2012) Environmental and topographic variables shape genetic structure and effective population sizes in the endangered Yosemite toad. Divers Distrib 10:1033–1041
Waples RS, Do C (2008) LDNe: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Res 8:753–756
Weyrauch SL, Grubb TC (2006) Effects of the interaction between genetic diversity and UV-B radiation on wood frog fitness. Biol Conserv 20:802–810
Wilkinson JW, Beebee TJC, Griffit RA (2007) Conservation genetics of an island toad: Bufo bufo in Jersey. Herpetol J 17:192–198
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the University of Ferrara, the Autonomous Province of Trento under the Grande Progetto ACE-SAP (Alpine Ecosystems in a Changing Environment: Biodiversity Sensitivity and Adaptive Potential; University and Scientific Research Service, regulation number 23, 12 June 2008, Trento) and the Fondazione Edmund Mach under the FEM International Research School of Trentino (FIRS>T). We thank Alexis Marchesini and Barbara Crestanello for their assistance during sampling. We thank Matteo Girardi for invaluable assistance during lab work. Many thanks to Daniele Canestrelli and Heidi Hauffe for helpful comments during the study and on the manuscript. GB is also grateful to Christian Schlötterer for his hospitality at the Institute of Population Genetics in Vienna during the revision of this paper. SH was also supported by a Postdoctoral Fellow at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, an Institute sponsored by the National Science Foundation through NSF Award #DBI-1300426, with additional support from The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Author contributions
LC and CV conceived and designed the study, collected the samples, and genetically typed the individuals. LC, GB and AB planned and performed the statistical analyses and interpreted them. GB wrote the manuscript, with the assistance of SH and LC. All authors examined data, discussed results, contributed to manuscript revision and approved the final draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Data accessibility
Mitochondrial sequences are available in GenBank with accession numbers KP784451 to KP784453. Microsatellite data are deposited in Dryad with doi:10.5061/dryad.2vp4v.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cornetti, L., Benazzo, A., Hoban, S. et al. Ancient, but not recent, population declines have had a genetic impact on alpine yellow-bellied toad populations, suggesting potential for complete recovery. Conserv Genet 17, 727–743 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0818-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0818-5