Abstract
We present the updated checklist of the alien flora of Mongolia, with information on species status, taxonomy, distribution, habitats, and economic use. In total, we recorded 154 taxa of alien plants, of which 33 are naturalized and 121 are casual. The alien flora belongs to 32 families, with Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae, and Brassicaceae containing most of the naturalized species and Asteraceae and Poaceae being the richest in casuals. Annuals (101 species) and perennials (27 species) are the most common life forms among the alien species of Mongolia, while woody and aquatic are only represented by two species and parasitic by one species. The majority of Mongolian alien plants originate from temperate Asia (81 species), Europe (72 species), and Africa (53 species). Alien species are restricted to a relatively narrow range of habitats, all heavily transformed by humans, with 42.2% of all species recorded in agricultural habitats. Regarding economic use, food plants dominate, while those used as fodder show the greatest naturalization success. The 29 most widespread naturalized alien species were recorded in all 22 provinces. Compared to other countries in temperate Asia, the Mongolian alien flora is relatively poor, which can be attributed to harsh climatic conditions and the country’s isolation in the past. Our study provides the first step toward a science-based approach to plant invasions by policymakers, authorities, and managers in Mongolia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biological invasions have long been recognized as a major driver of global biodiversity loss, with diverse impacts on invaded species, communities, and ecosystems (Brondizio et al. 2019; Pyšek et al. 2020; IPBES 2023). Alien plants represent one of the best-studied taxonomic groups (Pyšek et al. 2008); in the last decade, the knowledge of their distribution has dramatically improved globally (van Kleunen et al. 2015, 2019; Pyšek et al. 2017), including analyses of invasion dynamics (Seebens et al. 2017), but the lack of data from certain parts of the world like Central Asia pertains (Pyšek et al. 2008, 2017). The standardization of the terminology reflecting stages of the invasion process allowed assigning species to clear categories based on their level of invasion and contributed to the improved understanding of biological invasions over the last 20 years (Richardson et al. 2000; Pyšek et al. 2004; Blackburn et al. 2011; Essl et al. 2018). This, hand in hand with raised awareness and increasing interest in biological invasions, allowed for standardized compilation of alien plant species distribution data for regions of the world that suffered from the lack of data until not long ago (Latombe et al. 2017); this research yielded many checklists from previously understudied regions (e.g. Inderjit et al. 2018; Ansong et al. 2019; Dorjee et al. 2020; Borokini et al. 2023; Holmes et al. 2023; Sohrabi et al. 2023) and contributed to global analyses of invasion patterns, mechanisms and historical legacies (e.g. Essl et al. 2019; Lenzner et al. 2022; Fristoe et al. 2023; Pyšek et al. 2023).
In many countries, invasive alien species negatively impact regional floras and faunas, and their spread is attributed to climate change and human factors, especially trade and land use (Montagnani et al. 2022). Among reported impacts are changes in vegetation cover or even ecosystem functioning, causing soil erosion, change in their physical and chemical composition and irreversible desertification (Brooks et al. 2006), and resulting in the reduction of biological diversity (Vilà et al. 2011; Pyšek et al. 2012, 2020; Shiferaw et al. 2018; IPBES 2023).
Until now, Mongolia belonged to such understudied regions with regard to the completeness of information on the country’s alien flora, despite recently raised awareness of biosecurity issues. Alien plants have increased rapidly in Mongolia over the past 30 years, and the recent research yielded a total of 51 species (M. Urgamal, unpublished data); more recently, 62 were reported in the Global Naturalized Alien Floras (GloNAF) database (van Kleunen et al. 2019). The biosecurity in Mongolia has only recently started to be debated, and there is a lack of information at the national level about alien species and their harmful effects. In 2010, when the term “alien plant” was first included in the national law (https://legalinfo.mn/en), invasions became an issue for science and policy, and propositions were made to restrict the cultivation of imported and introduced species in nature.
This study aims to improve the knowledge of plant invasions in Mongolia. We present the most comprehensive checklist to date, with information on the taxonomic structure of the alien flora, the geographical distribution of the recorded species, and analysis of their invasion status, origin, and life history.
Methods
Study area
Mongolia is the second-largest landlocked country worldwide, surrounded by Russia to the north and China to the south, with an area of about 1,564,116 km2. The western and northern regions are dominated by mountainous terrain, while the eastern and southern areas are flat steppe and deserts. The climate is highly continental, with pronounced differences between warm to hot summers and very cold winters. The average annual temperature is 8.5 °C in the Gobi region, and reaches –7.8 °C in the high-mountain areas. Forests are widespread in the mountains of the north, grasslands prevail in the eastern part of the country, and rocky and desert areas occupy large areas in the south and in the depression of the Great Lakes (Yembuu 2020).
The native flora of Mongolia is rather rich due to the large land area and diverse habitats, ranging from the northern taiga forest to the southern Gobi Desert; the most recent checklist reports 3,041 vascular plant taxa (Baasanmunkh et al. 2022). In Mongolia, there are 16 phytogeographical regions defined based on differences in plant species distributions (Grubov and Yunatov 1952) and 22 administrative political units (provinces; Table 1), including capital city Ulaanbaatar. While most plant taxonomists follow the phytogeographical division for their research, studies on alien or invasive species usually use administrative units to determine their distribution areas (Liu et al. 2005; Vinogradova et al. 2018; Qian et al. 2022), probably because of the close association of alien plant’s occurrence with human activities that can be then expressed by proxies related to economy and demography. Here, to obtain insight into the effect of natural and human-related factors, we considered both categories and compiled a list of alien vascular plant species for each administrative unit and phytogeographical region (Supplementary Information 1). For each administrative unit, we obtained information on the human population size (National Statistics Office of Mongolia 2024).
Compilation of data on alien flora
The list of alien plant species occurring in Mongolia was compiled based on books and journal articles (Grubov 1955, 1982; Gubanov 1996; Ulziikhutag 1984, 2003; Javzan and Ochgerel 2010; Manibazar 2010; Urgamal et al. 2013, 2014; Urgamal and Sanchir 2014; Munkhnast et al. 2020; Baasanmunkh et al. 2022; Undruul et al. 2023). The latest compilation (Baasanmunkh et al. 2022) reported 3041 species of vascular plants in Mongolia, of which 24 were alien. As a basis of our checklist, we used the data of M. Urgamal (unpublished), who registered 51 alien plants from 48 genera and 23 families; this figure represented 1.6% of the country’s plant diversity. Most recently, Munkhnast et al. (2020) recorded 35 species of alien plants in Mongolia. The two recent lists differed in the numbers of reported aliens by 37%, therefore representing a somewhat unreliable basis for taking measures against alien species nationally. Presenting a thoroughly revised checklist of Mongolian alien flora that reflects an up-to-date state of knowledge is necessary to provide authorities and policymakers with more reliable data.
We further present data on the region of origin, year of introduction, economic uses, and life history of the alien taxa of Mongolia; data were extracted from the same literature as used for compiling the species list (see above).
Classification of invasion status
Alien plant taxa were defined as those in a given area whose presence is due to intentional or accidental human introduction (Richardson et al. 2000; Pyšek et al. 2004; IPBES 2023). As to the invasion status, we classified species as naturalized or casual, using the criteria developed by Richardson et al. (2000) – naturalized plants reproduce consistently in the wild without direct intervention by humans and form self-sustaining populations, while casual plants may occasionally reproduce in an area, but do not replace the populations and rely on repeated introduction. Information on the invasion status, i.e., whether a species is naturalized or casual in Mongolia, followed that presented by Urgamal (2017) and Munkhnast et al. (2020); the species not included in their papers were assessed based on our field observations. Current knowledge of the alien flora in Mongolia cannot reliably identify which naturalized species are invasive; therefore, this category has not been assigned.
Statistical analysis
We used the chi-square goodness of fit test to test whether naturalized and casual species are significantly distinct from an expected distribution in terms of their life form, habitat type, and continent of native distribution. We removed the attributes of which the expected values were below five from the calculations (for life forms, we removed aquatic, parasitic, shrub, and tree; for habitat type, wetlands; for native origin, Australasia; and for economic use, medicinal).
To analyze temporal trends in the proportional number of alien species’ first records, we calculated a binomial generalized linear model (GLM). As a response variable, we used proportional alien species richness per year. As predictors, we included the first record of the respective species as an interaction term with invasion status (i.e., whether it is reported as a casual or naturalized species in Mongolia). We plotted the cumulative species richness as solid lines using the “loess” method.
To evaluate the similarity of species composition of alien species among phytogeographical regions in Mongolia, we used the Jaccard dissimilarity index, which is based on incidence data (Jaccard 1900). Jaccard dissimilarity index ranges from 0 (regions with identical species composition) to 1 (regions completely distinct in species composition).
All analyses were performed in R version 4.3.1 (R Core Team 2023) using the packages betapart (Baselga and Orme 2012), ggplot2 (Wickham 2016), tidyverse (Wickham et al. 2019) and sf (Pebesma 2018; Pebesma and Bivand 2023). The map of Mongolia was obtained from the Database of Global Administrative Areas (GADM; https://gadm.org/).
Results
Species richness and structure of the alien flora
In total, we recorded 154 taxa of alien plants (further referred to as ‘species’ for simplicity), of which 33 species (22%) are naturalized and 121 (78%) are casual (Table 2). The complete species list with information on characteristics analyzed below is shown in Supplementary Information 1.
The alien flora belongs to 32 families; Fabaceae (n = 23 species), Asteraceae (n = 22), Poaceae (n = 21), and Brassicaceae (n = 16) are the families with the largest numbers of alien species, while 20 families are represented by only one or two species. The families with the most alien genera are Asteraceae (20) and Fabaceae (14). Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae, and Brassicaceae include the largest numbers of naturalized species, while Asteraceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, and Brassicaceae are richest in casuals (Table 2).
Annual (101 species: 82 casual and 19 naturalized) and perennial (27 species: 20 casual and seven naturalized species) plants account for the vast majority of the alien species in Mongolia, while woody, aquatic, and parasitic species are only represented by one or two species. We found no association between life form and status (χ2 = 1.1, df = 2, p > 0.05).
The most common continents of origin for Mongolian alien species are temperate Asia (81 species; 52.6%; 57 casuals and 24 naturalized), Europe (71 species; 46.1%; 49 casuals and 22 naturalized), and Africa (52 species; 33.7%; 37 casuals and 15 naturalized); note that each species can be native to more than one continent (Fig. 1). There was no association between the continent of origin and species status (χ2 = 2, df = 5, p > 0.05).
Habitats
Alien species in Mongolia are restricted to a relatively narrow range of habitats, all heavily transformed by humans. The greatest proportion of species are found in agricultural habitats (65 species, i.e., 42.2% of all species recorded), ruderal habitats, and ornamental gardens harbor 45 species (29.2%) each. Only one alien species, Lotus corniculatus, has spread to wetlands in Mongolia. There was an association between habitat type and species status (χ2 = 48.5, df = 2, p < 0.001), in which more naturalized species than expected were found in ruderal habitats and more casual species than expected were found in agricultural and garden habitats.
Economic use
Regarding economic use, most species are used for human food (n = 71, of which 68 are casual and three naturalized), followed by land use (ornamental) (n = 46, of which 42 are casual and four naturalized), fodder (n = 19, of which 13 are casual and six naturalized) and medicine (n = 7, of which three are casual and four naturalized). We found a significant association between the economic use of plants and species invasion status (χ2 = 13, df = 2, p < 0.001). There was a higher prevalence than expected of naturalized (and consequently, lower of casuals) for fodder, as well as a higher prevalence of casuals for human food.
Dynamics of introduction
There was no statistically different trend between casual and naturalized richness proportions (Fig. 2a). Model results are given in Table S1 (Supplementary Information 2). The first alien plant species were recorded in Mongolia in 1955; at that time, 21 were reported (e.g., Allium fistulosum, Amaranthus retroflexus, Panicum miliaceum, Xanthium strumarium). After that, only from 1984 onwards, there was a sharp increase in the cumulative number of alien species that has continued to the present day (Fig. 2b).
The cumulative number of alien species increased mainly due to casuals that accumulated faster than naturalized species (Fig. 2b). Note that two sources of data (Ulziikhutag 1984; Javzan and Ochgerel 2010) account for about half of the recorded species (Fig. 2a).
Spatial patterns: distribution of alien species in administrative units and phytogeographical regions
In terms of administrative units, Darkhan-Uul is the richest province in alien species (130 species. i.e., 84.4%), followed by Selenge (119, 77.3%) and Ulaanbaatar city (109, 70.8%). The fewest aliens were recorded in the Bayan-Ulgii, Dornogovi, Gobi-Sumber, and Dundgobi provinces (less than 45 aliens in each, Fig. 3).
There are 29 species that occur in all 22 provinces, making them the most widespread (e.g., Beta vulgaris, Anethum graveolens, Raphanus raphanistrum, Xanthium strumarium). Three species (Hordeum vulgare, Panicum miliaceum, Solanum melongena) occur in 21 provinces, and Acer negundo in 20 provinces (Supplementary Information 1). Regarding phytogeographical regions, Mongolian Dauria (n = 132), Khentii (n = 83), and Mongolian Altai (n = 56) were the richest in alien species (Table 3).
The analysis of species composition reveals that most phytogeographical regions in Mongolia are quite distinct in their naturalized floras (yellow to red color, Fig. 4). The exception, in which the pair of phytogeographical regions has similar species composition, are the neighboring biogeographic regions of Mongolian Altai and Dzungarian Gobi (in light blue). To a lesser extent, East Mongolia and East Gobi, also neighboring, share more species than other pairs of regions (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Alien plant species richness and regional distribution patterns
Our research revealed that the overall number of alien plant species in Mongolia is relatively low, just 154 for a country of that size. Moreover, a thorough reassessment of the invasion status with a focus on the naturalization stage, revealed that only 33 species can be assigned this status. To put it differently, naturalized plants comprise just 1% of the native vascular plant species pool, and casuals make up another 4%. Compared to adjacent regions, the small size of the alien flora is conspicuous. In two adjacent regions of about half its size and similar climatic conditions to Mongolia, located in Kazakhstan (Aral Caspian and Lake Balkash Area), 51 and 56 naturalized species, respectively, are reported (Pyšek et al. 2017). Even greater contrast is given by 278 naturalized species reported from a Chinese province of Inner Mongolia (van Kleunen et al. 2019). In regions in Southern Siberia, 104 naturalized species were recorded in Khakassia, 165 in the Altai Republic, 44 in the Tuva Republic, and 128 in Buryatia (van Kleunen et al. 2019); all these regions are considerably smaller in area than Mongolia.
The low number of alien plant species in Mongolia likely reflects the specific environmental (e.g., harsh climate) and socioeconomic conditions. For the latter, the isolated location of the country and long-lasting communist dictatorship severely constrained socioeconomic development and international trade. Further, the very low population density of 2.2 people/km2 makes Mongolia the most sparsely populated country in the world and likely explains some of the observed differences to neighboring countries (e.g., Kazakhstan: 7 people/km2; Inner Mongolia: 20 people/km2). Thus, road and railway infrastructures that facilitate alien species’ introduction and spread are poorly developed in Mongolia. Railways mainly connect larger population centers, particularly the greater Ulaanbaatar region and neighboring districts, which correspond to areas with highest alien species richness. The harsh climatic conditions limit agriculture to small areas in the more humid parts of Mongolia; in fact, farming has no long tradition in the country, and despite a great expansion of the quota of arable land in the 1960s and 1970s, the cultivated land still accounted for less than 1% of the country’s area (Hilbig 1982; Enkhbat and Nyamdavaa 2022). Thus, relatively few alien plant species have been introduced by farming activities, and the scarcity of suitable habitats limits the richness of alien flora in segetal habitats, which are highly invaded in other temperate regions of the globe (e.g., Chytrý et al. 2008). Still, the agricultural land represents the richest habitat, with over 40% of aliens recorded there, even though a significantly greater proportion of them are casuals. The greatest naturalization success was recorded for ruderal habitats, corresponding to findings from other countries where data on habitat affiliations are available (e.g., Crawley 1987; Chytrý et al. 2008; Pyšek et al. 2022). In contrast, only very few woody species, a life form that is well-represented in the alien global flora (Pyšek et al. 2017), are present in the alien flora of Mongolia, reflecting a lack of suitable environmental conditions and, consequently, habitats for such species. The same holds for aquatic species.
Despite the species-poor alien flora, the differentiation in its composition on the regional scale is quite pronounced in Mongolia. This finding seems to be mainly driven by the large size of the country, the concomitant substantial climatic gradients, and possibly further enhanced by differences in human population density and anthropogenic pressures.
Introduction and naturalization dynamics
The first records of alien plants in Mongolia were only documented in the mid-twentieth century. Although invasion dynamics have been dramatically increasing worldwide in recent decades (Seebens et al. 2017), this is a very late onset of recording of alien plants compared to countries with a longer tradition of alien plant research. Most likely, this belated recording of alien plant species is caused by the long-lasting isolation of the country, little research into the flora of Mongolia until recent decades, and possibly also delayed inclusion of the data into global databases. Only recently has Mongolia become more thoroughly integrated into global trade networks, and together with increased research, the number of recorded aliens has been growing more rapidly since the 1980s.
However, the recently more steeply growing number of casual alien plant species indicates that the accumulation of alien plant species has gained momentum. Thus, it remains to be seen if, in the future, the records of naturalized plant species numbers will also grow more rapidly in Mongolia. Given the substantially larger alien flora in climatically similar adjacent regions such as Inner Mongolia, southern Siberia, and Kazakhstan (see Pyšek et al. 2017; van Kleunen et al. 2019 and references there), it seems likely that the currently rapid alien species accumulation will continue in the future.
Economic use and management implications
Economic use is one of the major factors contributing to the introduction of alien plants and, later on, may also support their success in new regions (Vilà and Pujadas 2001; Essl et al. 2011; van Kleunen et al. 2020; Pouteau et al. 2021). Individuals and organizations bring and grow many kinds of plants and crops from foreign countries for decoration, food, medicine, and hays (van Kleunen et al. 2020). Due to limited border inspection control and detection capabilities in Mongolia, imported plants and their propagules, including grains and seeds, can easily spread to agricultural areas. Our study emphasizes the importance of alien species introduced to Mongolia used for human food and as ornamentals. For example, alien plants (but also some native parasitic plants) have become abundant in the western provinces of Mongolia in the last 4–5 years, which has limited the growth of vegetables and grains in the region, worsened the yield, and hindered the growth of local native plants. The spread of these species also affects the livelihood of rural people. Examples of these species are Amaranthus retroflexus, Brassica juncea, Chloris virgata, Lepidium densiflorum and Malva sylvestris.
Our paper provides the first comprehensive checklist of the alien flora of Mongolia, which has been an understudied country in terms of plant invasion research until now. Reliable knowledge of the taxonomic composition, distribution patterns, and dynamics of alien flora, in particular its naturalized part, is a crucial step toward science-based management to be adopted by policymakers, authorities, and managers to mitigate the current and future impacts of alien species (Meyerson et al. 2022). In recent years, there has been progress toward a standardized approach for systematically monitoring alien species and tracking biological invasions (Latombe et al. 2017; Pyšek et al. 2018). The up-to-date information on its alien flora places Mongolia among countries concerned with the global consequences of biological invasions.
References
Ansong M, Pergl J, Essl F, Hejda M, van Kleunen M, Randall R, Pyšek P (2019) Naturalized and invasive alien flora of Ghana. Biol Invasions 21:669–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1860-7
Baasanmunkh S, Urgamal M, Oyuntsetseg B, Sukhorukov AP, Tsegmed Z, Son DC, Erst A, Oyundelger K, Kechaykin AA, Norris J, Kosachev P, Ma J-S, Chang KS, Choi HJ (2022) Flora of Mongolia: annotated checklist of native vascular plants. PhytoKeys 192:63–169. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.192.79702
Baselga A, Orme CDL (2012) Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 3:808–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Borokini IT, Kortz A, Anibaba Q, Witt A, Aigbokhan E, Hejda M, Pyšek P (2023) Alien flora of Nigeria: taxonomy, biogeography, habitats, and ecological impacts. Biol Invasions 25:3677–3696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03140-1
Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT (eds) (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn
Brooks ML, Matchett JR, Berry KH (2006) Effects of livestock watering sites on alien and native plants in the Mojave desert, USA. J Arid Environ 67:125–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.09.022
Chytrý M, Maskell LC, Pino J, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Font X, Smart SM (2008) Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. J Appl Ecol 45:448–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x
Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 429–453
Dorjee, Johnson SB, Buckmaster AJ, Downey PO (2020) Weeds in the land of gross national happiness: knowing what to manage by creating a baseline alien plant inventory for Bhutan. Biol Invasions 22:2899–2914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02306-5
Enkhbat A, Nyamdavaa G (2022) Report on the state of the environment in Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar.
Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hülber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Vilà M, Genovesi P, Gherardi F, Desprez-Lousteau M-L, Roques A, Pyšek P (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011728108
Essl F, Bacher S, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kowarik I, Kühn I, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Schindler S, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2018) Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. Bioscience 68:496–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy057
Essl F, Dawson W, Kreft H, Pergl J, Pyšek P, van Kleunen M, Weigelt P, Mang T, Dullinger S, Lenzner B, Moser D, Maurel N, Seebens H, Stein A, Weber E, Chatelain C, Inderjit, Genovesi P, Kartesz J, Morozova O, Nishino M, Novak PM, Pagad S, Shu W, Winter M (2019) Drivers of the relative richness of naturalized and invasive plant species on the Earth. AoB Plants 11:plz051. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz051
Fristoe TS, Bleilevens J, Kinlock NL, Yang Q, Zhang Z, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Weigelt P, Dufour-Dror JM, Sennikov AN, Wasowicz P, Westergaard KB, van Kleunen M (2023) Evolutionary imbalance, climate and human history jointly shape the global biogeography of alien plants. Nat Ecol Evol 7:1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02172-z
Grubov VI (1982) Key to the vascular plants of Mongolia. Nauka, Leningrad ([in Russian])
Grubov VI, Yunatov AA (1952) Main peculiarities of the flora of Mongolian people’s republic in relation to its division. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 37:45–64 ([in Russian])
Grubov VI (1955) Conspectus of flora of people’s republic of Mongolia, vol 67. Series of Mongolian Commission of Academy of USSR, Moscow, Leningrad [in Russian]
Gubanov IA (1996) Conspectus of the flora in outer Mongolia. Valang, Moscow ([in Russian])
Hilbig W (1982) Mongolia. In: Holzner W, Numata M (eds) Biology and ecology of weeds. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 277–279
Holmes R, Pelser P, Barcelona J, Tjitrosoedirdjo SS, Wayhuni I, van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Essl F, Kreft H, Dawson W, Wijedasa L, Kortz A, Hejda M, Berrio JC, Siregar I, Williams M (2023) The naturalized vascular flora of Malesia. Biol Invasions 25:1339–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02989-y
Inderjit PJ, van Kleunen M, Hejda M, Babu CR, Majumdar S, Singh P, Singh SP, Salamma S, Rao BRP, Pyšek P (2018) Naturalized alien flora of the Indian states: biogeographic patterns, taxonomic structure and drivers of species richness. Biol Invasions 20:1625–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1622-y
IPBES (2023) Summary for policymakers of the thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Roy HE, Pauchard A, Stoett P, Renard Truong T, Bacher S, Galil BS, Hulme PE, Ikeda T, Sankaran KV, McGeoch MA, Meyerson LA, Nuñez MA, Ordonez A, Rahlao SJ, Schwindt E, Seebens H, Sheppard AW, Vandvik V (eds) IPBES secretariat, Bonn. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692
Jaccard P (1900) Contribution au problème de l’immigration post-glaciare de la flore alpine. Bull De La Soc Vaud Des Sci Nat 36:87–130
Javzan S, Ochgerel N (2010) Annual flowers to plant in flowerbeds. Bembi San, Ulaanbaatar [in Mongolian]
Latombe G, Pyšek P, Jeschke JM, Blackburn TM, Bacher S, Capinha C, Costello MJ, Fernández M, Gregory RD, Hobern D, Hui C, Jetz W, Kumschick S, McGrannachan C, Pergl J, Roy HE, Scalera R, Squires ZE, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, McGeoch MA (2017) A vision for global monitoring of biological invasions. Biol Conserv 213:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.013
Lenzner B, Latombe G, Schertler A, Seebens H, Yang Q, Winter M, Weigelt P, van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Kreft H, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Essl F (2022) Naturalized alien floras still carry the legacy of European colonialism. Nat Ecol Evol 6:1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01865-1
Liu J, Liang SC, Liu FH, Wang RQ, Dong M (2005) Invasive alien plant species in China: regional distribution patterns. Divers Distrib 11:341–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00162
Manibazar N (2010) Dictionary of Latin-Mongolian species name of vascular plants in Mongolia, vol II. Mongolian State Language Press, Ulaanbaatar ([in Mongolian])
Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Brundu G, Carlton JT, Hierro JL, Kueffer C, Pandit MK, Pyšek P, Richardson DM Packer JG (2022) Moving toward global strategies for managing invasive alien species. In: Clements DR, Upadhyaya MK, Joshi S, Shrestha A (eds) Global plant invasions. Springer, Cham, pp 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89684-3_16
Montagnani C, Gentili R, Brundu G, Caronni S, Citterio S (2022) Accidental introduction and spread of top invasive alien plants in the European union through human-mediated agricultural pathways: what should we expect? Agronomy 12:423. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020423
Munkhnast D, Chuluunjav C, Urgamal M, Wong LJ, Pagad S (2020) GRIIS checklist of introduced and invasive species-Mongolia. Version 2.7. Invasive species specialist group ISSG. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/cskgr1. Accessed via GBIF.org on 2024–01–28
National Statistics Office of Mongolia (2024) Mongolian statistical information service. Ulaanbaatar. https://www.1212.mn/en
Pebesma E, Bivand R (2023) Spatial data science: with applications in R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429459016
Pebesma E (2018) Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J 10:439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
Pouteau R, Thuiller W, Hobohm C, Brunel C, Conn BJ, Dawson W, de Sá Dechoum M, Dufour-Dror JM, Ebel AL, Essl F, Fragman-Sapir O, Fristoe T, Jogan N, Kreft H, Lenzner B, Meyer C, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Verkhozina A, Weigelt P, Yang Q, Zykova E, Aćić S, Agrillo E, Attorre F, Bergamini A, Berg C, Bergmeier E, Biurrun I, Boch S, Bonari G, Botta-Dukát Z, Bruelheide H, Campos JA, Čarni A, Casella L, Carranza ML, Chytrý M, Ćušterevska R, De Sanctis M, Dengler J, Dimopoulos P, Ejrnæs R, Ewald J, Fanell G, Fernández-González F, Gavilán RG, Gegout J-C, Haveman R, Isermann M, Jandt U, Jansen F, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Kavgacı A, Khanina L, Knollová I, Kuzemko A, Lebedeva M, Lenoir J, Lysenko T, Marcenò C, Martynenko V, Moeslund JE, Pätsch R, Pielech R, Rašomavičius V, de Ronde I, Ruprecht E, Rūsiņa S, Shirokikh P, Šibík J, Šilc U, Stanisci A, Stančić Z, Svenning J-C, Swacha G, Turtureanu PD, Valachovič M, Vassilev K, Yamalov S, van Kleunen M (2021) Climate and socio-economic factors explain differences between observed and expected naturalization patterns of European plants around the world. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 30:1514–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13316
Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135498
Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002
Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x
Pyšek P, Meyerson LA, Simberloff D (2018) Introducing “Alien Floras and Faunas”, a new series in biological invasions. Biol Invasions 20:1375–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1648-1
Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC, Genovesi P, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Liebhold AM, Mandrak NE, Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Pergl J, Roy HE, Seebens H, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wingfield MJ, Richardson DM (2020) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev 95:1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
Pyšek P, Lučanová M, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Leitch I, Lenzner B, Meyerson LA, Pergl J, van Kleunen M, Weigelt P, Winter M, Guo W-Y (2023) Small genome size and variation in ploidy levels support naturalization of plants but constrain invasive spread. New Phytol 239:2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1111/NPH.19135
Pyšek P, Pergl J, Essl F, Lenzner B, Dawson W, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Winter M, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Dullinger S, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Genovesi P, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit, Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Maurel N, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent D, Nowak PM, Pagad S, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Seebens H, Shu W, Thomas J, Velayos M, Weber E, Wieringa JJ, Baptiste MP, van Kleunen M (2017) Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion. Preslia 89:203–274. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2017.203
Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Kaplan Z, Pergl J, Pokorná A, Axmanová I, Čuda J, Doležal J, Dřevojan P, Hejda M, Kočár P, Kortz A, Lososová Z, Lustyk P, Skálová H, Štajerová K, Večeřa M, Vítková M, Wild J, Danihelka J (2022) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech republic (3rd edition): species richness, status, distributions, habitats, regional invasion levels, introduction pathways and impacts. Preslia 94:477–577. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2022.447
Qian H, Rejmánek M, Shenhua Q (2022) Are invasive species a phylogenetically clustered subset of naturalized species in regional floras? A case study for flowering plants in China. Divers Distrib 28:2084–2093. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13608
R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapow L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jäger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kühn I, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Štajerová K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Comm 8:14435. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435
Shiferaw W, Demissew S, Bekele T (2018) Invasive alien plants species in Ethiopia: ecological impacts on biodiversity a review paper. Int J Mol Biol Open Access 3:171–178. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijmboa.2018.03.00072
Sohrabi S, Naqinezhad A, Kortz A, Hejda M, Gherekhloo J, Zand E, Pergl J, Brundu D, Pyšek P (2023) Alien flora of Iran: species status, introduction dynamics, habitats and pathways. Biol Invasions 25:1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03001-x
Ulziikhutag N (1984) Dictionary of Latin-Mongolian-Russian names of vascular plants in people’s republic of Mongolia. In: Scientific proceedings of the state terminology commission 129–133: 1–444. Ulaanbaatar [in Mongolian]
Ulziikhutag N (2003) Legumes of Mongolia: taxonomy, ecology, geography, phylogeny and economic importances. Bembi San, Ulaanbaatar [in Mongolian]
Undruul A, Munkhtulga A, Baasanmunkh S, Oyuntsetseg B, Tsegmed Z, Ser-Oddamba B, Choi HL (2023) Two new alien records of Hordeum jubatum (Poaceae) and Tripleurospermum inodorum (Asteraceae) in Mongolia. Korean J Plant Taxonom 53:281–287. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2023.53.4.281
Urgamal M (2017) Mongolian flora, and vegetation. In: Nyamdavaa G, Avid B (eds) Mongolian biodiversity. Vol 3. Munkhiin useg Co Ltd, Ulaanbaatar, pp 12–98 [in Mongolian]
Urgamal M, Oyuntsetseg B, Nyambayar D (2013) Synopsis and recent additions to the flora of Mongolia. Proc Inst Bot Mongol Acad Sci 25:53–72 ([in Mongolian])
Urgamal M, Sanchir Ch (2014) Addition to the flora of Mongol Daurian phytogeographical region in Mongolia. In: The international conference on Daurian international protected areas (DIPA), celebrate it`s 20th year anniversary. Dornod, on 20–23 June, 2014 [in Mongolian]
Urgamal M, Oyuntsetseg B, Nyambayar D, Dulamsuren Ch (2014) Conspectus of the vascular plants of Mongolia. In: Sanchir Ch, Jamsran Ts (eds) Admon, Ulaanbaatar [in Mongolian]
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit KA, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Moser D, Nickrent DL, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Baptiste MP, Poopath M, Schulze M, Seebens H, Shu W, Thomas J, Velayos M, Wieringa JJ, Pyšek P (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910
van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, Weigelt P, Stein A, Dullinger S, König C, Lenzner B, Maurel N, Moser D, Seebens H, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Aleksanyan A, Ansong M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Breckle SW, Brundu G, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castaño N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Conn B, de Sá DM, Dufour-Dror JM, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fragman-Sapir O, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit JN, Krestov P, Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Nickrent D, Nowak A, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Shu W-S, Thomas J, Uludag A, Velayos M, Verkhosina A, Villaseñor JL, Weber E, Wieringa J, Yazlık A, Zeddam A, Zykova E, Winter M (2019) The global naturalized alien flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100:e02542. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2542
van Kleunen M, Xu X, Yang Q, Maurel N, Zhang Z, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Weigelt P, Moser D, Lenzner B, Fristoe T (2020) Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nat Comm 11:3201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16982-3
Vilà M, Pujadas J (2001) Land-use and socioeconomic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol Conserv 100:397–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00047-7
Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
Vinogradova Y, Pergl J, Hejda M, Essl F, van Kleunen M, REGIONAL CONTRIBUTORS, Pyšek P (2018) Invasive alien plants of Russia: insights from regional inventories. Biol Invasions 20:1931−1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1686-3
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. 978-3-319-24277-4
Yembuu B (Eds) (2020) The physical geography of Mongolia Munkhiin Useg printing. Ulaanbaatar. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61434-8 [in Mongolian]
Acknowledgements
PP, and AK were supported by EXPRO grant no. 19-28807X (Czech Science Foundation) and long-term research development project RVO 67985939 (Czech Academy of Sciences).
Funding
This work was supported by Czech Science Foundation (EXPRO grant no. 19-28807X) and Czech Academy of Sciences (long-term research development project RVO 67985939).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Vanjil, G., Kortz, A., Lenzner, B. et al. Alien flora of Mongolia: species richness, introduction dynamics and spatial patterns. Biol Invasions 26, 2407–2419 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03309-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03309-2