Abstract
In this study, the effects of kaolin (M-99-099) applications on the total phenolic and antioxidant contents of tea leaves (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) harvested in three different periods were investigated. For this purpose, four different strategies including standard fertilizer application (T), 3% kaolin+standard fertilizer application (Ka1), 6% kaolin+standard fertilizer application (Ka2), and control (C) (nothing applied) were used to compare the effects of these strategies on total phenolic content, FRAP values, and DPPH radical scavenging capacities of tea leaves. It has been proven that the kaolin applications, Ka1 and Ka2, increase the phenolic content and antioxidant contents of tea samples. While the kaolin applications have higher values at 1st harvest than those of T and C, they have the lowest values at 3rd harvest.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tea, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze, is a drink and food material obtained after the processing of its fresh leaves with different methods. China, India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, and Turkey are the countries where tea is widely cultivated, and tea production is heavily made. With these countries, there are about forty countries also producing tea (FAO 2015). Ranking sixth among the tea-producing countries, Turkey has made significant progress in the tea cultivation and tea industry in recent years. Tea has become a strategic product for the country’s economy.
Tea is an important source of polyphenols (Gramza and Korczak, 2005). There are studies on the extracts of leaves of green tea (Bu-Abbas et al. 1997; Baptista et al. 1999; Row and Jin 2005; Sharma et al. 2005; Perva-Uzunalic et al. 2006) and fresh tea (Yao et al. 2004). Fresh tea leaves are rich in polyphenols, especially flavan-3-ol (catechin) and flavanol glycosides (Clifford et al. 2000). In recent years, tea catechins have gained attention due to their biological activities (Chen et al. 2001) such as antioxidant (Zandi and Gordon 1999; Mello et al. 2005; Navas et al. 2005), antimutagenic (Halder et al. 2005), anticarcinogenic (Han 1997; Zhu et al. 2005), and antibacterial (An et al. 2004).
Tea is highly consumed after water in Turkey and all over the world due to its beneficial effects such as reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancers, improving antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activity, and regulating food intake. Most of these effects have been attributed to functional components such as polyphenols, polysaccharides, minerals, and amino acids in tea leaves that vary according to genetic strain, climatic conditions, soil profile, growth altitude, horticultural practices, or plucking season (Kosinska and Andlauer 2014; Yang et al. 2014).
Recently, several groups have focused on how total phenol contents, antioxidant capacity, and element contents of tea samples change at different harvest times with some applications. Yang et al. (2014) investigated the effects of fertilizing with N, P, Se, and Zn on functional component and antioxidant activity of tea leaves. In another study, Topuz et al. (2014) investigated the effect of shooting period, shading, and clone on physicochemical properties of Turkish green tea. In 2010, Erturk et al. also reported a paper on how harvest time and clones affect total phenolic, antioxidant activity in Turkish tea shoots. It can be concluded from these studies that total phenolic content, antioxidant capacities, and mineral contents of tea leaves depend on clones, harvest time, climatic conditions, and the materials applied.
Kaolin, its use has increased in agriculture in recent years, generates a cuticle-like protective layer and a reflective white surface on plants and fruit to protect them against biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Glenn et al. 2002; Yazıcı and Kaynak 2009). According to the studies conducted, kaolin applications are used to reduce environmental stresses such as sun damages and temperature stress (Glenn et al. 2001; 2002; Tworkoski et al. 2002; Yazıcı and Kaynak 2009), and insect damages (Glenn et al. 1999; Knight et al. 2000; Puterka et al. 2000a; Unruh et al. 2000) and to prevent the occurrence of diseases (Glenn et al. 1999; Puterka et al. 2000b). Kaolin application increased the fruit size, the amount of dry matter, and fat content in olives (Saour and Makee, 2003), and had a positive impact on the quality of pomegranate fruits (Yazıcı and Kaynak 2009). It was found that kaolin improved photosynthesis in both hot and temperate climates, and it results in increasing yield and quality of plants (Gleen et al. 2001), and also its exogenous application promoting the production of antioxidants, such as phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and vitamin C, which influence fruit quality (Bernardo 2015).
Environmental stresses lead to physiological and metabolic changes which cause loss in yield and quality while they affect the growth of tea negatively as in other plants. Unlike other countries where tea is grown in the world, The Eastern Black Sea Region, where Turkish tea grows, has temperate climatic conditions. Therefore, due to being the northernmost region for tea cultivation in the world, in some years, tea plant can be damaged by cold in early spring, which can cause losses in yield and quality. The foliar application of kaolin has proven effective in mitigating the negative impacts of these abiotic stresses in other fruit crops (Glenn et al. 2001, 2002); however, little is known about its influence on the composition of the tea leaf. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of Kaolin application on total phenol contents and antioxidant capacity of tea leaves cultivated in the ecological conditions of Rize province of Turkey.
Materials and Methods
Kaolin Application and Harvest
The trial was conducted in experimental orchards of Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Science, Department of Horticulture. The climate of the area is typically temperate and sub-temperate. The annual rainfall ranges between 1800 and 2200 mm. The average air temperature was calculated to be 14.1 °C, and the highest and the lowest air temperatures were measured as 37.9 °C and −7.0 °C, respectively. The orchard soil was sandy in texture with pH 4.50, 390 µhos/cm electrical conductivity (EC), and 3.65% organic matter.
In this study, four situations were compared (standard fertilizer application (T): 70 kg/daa, 25-5-10 composite fertilizer (commercial formulation: 25% NH(4)-N, 5% phosphorus, and 10% potassium oxide); Kaolin Application-1 (Ka1): %3 Kaolin+70 kg/daa 25-5-10 composite fertilizer; Kaolin Application-2 (Ka2): %6 Kaolin+70 kg/daa 25-5-10 composite fertilizer); and control (C): nothing applied. The study was conducted according to a completely randomized block design with three replicates. Each plot was approximately 40 m2. The tea plants were exposed to three kaolin applications with one week of intervals before each of the three harvests. After three weeks from the last kaolin application, the samples were collected at three harvest seasons: May 12, July 12, and September 6, 2016.
Chemicals and Instrumentation
The harvested tea plants were brought to the laboratory for withering and drying. The samples were kept in the drying box until their dry weights became stable. The dried samples were ground to a fine powder and kept at −20 °C until the antioxidant capacities and total phenolic content were carried out.
Gallic acids, 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,4,6-Tripyridyl-s-Triazine (TPTZ), and iron (II) sulfate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid, methanol, and acetic acid were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Other chemicals and solvents used in the experiments were purchased commercially, and used as received.
UV/vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) at 293 K. The pH measurements were carried out on a Hach Senson PH3 (Hach com., Loveland, USA) pH meter equipped with a Hach micro-combination electrode calibrated with standard buffer solutions.
Extraction
0.2 g of each dried-ground sample was extracted by 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol (20 mL). The extraction was carried out for 2 h using an orbital shaking at 40 °C. The cooled samples were filtered to be used directly for the determination of total phenol contents and antioxidant activities.
Determination of Total Phenolic Content
The total phenolic content was analyzed using the Folin–Ciocalteau method as described previously by Waterhouse (2002). Briefly, 20 μL of the extract was mixed with 1.58 mL of distilled water and subsequently with 100 μL of Folin–Ciocalteau reagent. After 3–5 min, 300 μL of sodium carbonate solution (75 g L−1) was added into the mixture. Then the mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 15 min, and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer (Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan). Gallic acid was used as the standard, and the results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of dried weight (DW) of the sample.
Determination of Antioxidant Activity by FRAP
The FRAP assay was carried out according to a modified previous method (Benzie and Strain 1996). The FRAP solution was prepared by mixing 25 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer (3.1 g of CH3COONa·3H2O and 16 mL of CH3COOH pH 3.6), 2.5 mL TPTZ solution (10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl), and 2.5 mL of 20 mM FeCl3·6H2O solution. 50 μL of the extract (or 50 μL of distilled water as blank) was mixed with 1.95 mL of the FRAP solution, and then the mixture was allowed to warm to 37 °C for 3 min. Absorbance was determined at 593 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer. FeSO4 was used as the standard to establish a standard curve. The results were expressed as mmol of iron (II) sulfate (FeSO4) equivalents per gram of dried weight (DW) of the sample.
Determination of Antioxidant Activity by DPPH
The antioxidant activity of the sample was performed using DPPH assay according to slightly modified method of Topuz et al. (2014). Diluted sample extract (100 μL) was added to 2 mL of freshly prepared DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl radical) solution (0.12 mM in 80% of MeOH). The mixtures were shaken and kept in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance values of the final solutions were recorded at 517 nm using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer. The antioxidant activity of the samples was expressed as percent inhibition of the DPPH radical and calculated by equation below:
where I is the inhibition percentage, and Ac and Au are the absorbance values of the control and test samples, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
The study was conducted according to a completely randomized block design with three replicates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effects of harvesting time and kaolin application on the quality parameters and chemical components of the tea samples and the Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to compare the averages (Gomez and Gomez 1984).
Results
In this study, the effects of the kaolin applications on the amount of the total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging capacity (%) were found to be statistically significant. However, the FRAP values were not statistically significant (Table 1).
Total Phenolic Content
The total phenolic contents (TP) of the green tea leaves are shown in Fig. 1. The highest total phenolic content in terms of the application averages was determined for C (125.32 mg GAE/g DW) and Ka2 (124.48 mg GAE/g DW), while the total phenolic content of Ka1 was calculated 123.91.7 mg GAE/g DW. The lowest value was calculated for T (117.04 mg GAE/g DW). In terms of the harvest time averages, the highest phenolic content (125.78 mg GAE/g DW) was determined at 1st harvest time, while the lowest (119.71 mg GAE/g DW) was found at 3rd harvest time (Table 1).
The highest total phenol values were determined in the first harvest, while the lowest values were determined in the second harvest for T, Ka1, and Ka2. TP for T, Ka1, and Ka2 were 120.60 ± 2.40, 130.13 ± 1.46, 131.64 ± 4.52 mg GAE/g DW at 1st harvest and decreased to 117.95 ± 4.46, 124.41 ± 2.24, 122.83 ± 2.22 mg GAE/g DW at 2nd harvest and then decreased further to 112.88 ± 4.19, 117.20 ± 2.39, 118.98 ± 3.25 mg GAE/g DW at 3rd harvest, respectively. However, for C, the highest value (129.75 ± 1.69) was calculated in the third harvest and the lowest value (120.73 ± 3.13) was determined in the first harvest. On the other word, the orders of TP for T, C, Ka1, Ka2 were Ka2 > Ka1 > C ≈ T at 1st harvest, Ka1 > Ka2 > C > T at 2nd harvest, and C > Ka2 > Ka1 > T at 3rd harvest (Fig. 1).
DPPH Radical-Scavenging Capacity
In terms of the application averages, the highest DPPH radical scavenging capacities were determined for the tea leaves applied with Ka2 (90.22%) which was statistically in the same group as Ka1 (89.68%). The lowest DPPH radical scavenging capacities were calculated for C and T (87.21% for C; 86.33% for T). In terms of the harvest time averages, the highest DPPH radical scavenging capacity (90.99%) was found at 1st harvest time, while the lowest DPPH radical scavenging capacities were determined at 3rd (86.46) harvest times (Table 1).
Similarly, DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the tea samples at different harvest times were 1st harvest > 2nd harvest > 3rd harvest (Fig. 2). The strongest DPPH antioxidant activity was found for Ka1 and Ka2 at 1st harvest time (92.60% and 93.60%, respectively). The lowest DPPH values were obtained from 3rd harvest for all the strategies. The values were found as follows: for C: 89.25 ± 1.19, 86.61 ± 1.09, 85.76 ± 1.53; for T: 88.51 ± 1.20, 85.88 ± 1.07, 84.61 ± 1.53; for Ka1: 92.60 ± 1.20, 88.45 ± 0.68, 87.98 ± 1.53; and for Ka2: 93.60 ± 1.19, 89.60 ± 1.08, 87.47 ± 1.07at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harvest times, respectively (Fig. 2).
FRAP Assay
In terms of the application averages, the highest FRAP values (mmol FeSO4/g DW) were determined from the tea leaves applied with C (5.63), T (5.35), Ka1 (5.42), and Ka2 (5.30) which are not statistically significant. In terms of the harvest time averages, the highest FRAP value (5.49) was found at 1st harvest time, while the lowest FRAP value (5.36) was determined at 3rd harvest time (Table 1).
The orders of FRAP levels for C, T, Ka1, and Ka2 were similar to that seen in total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging capacities. The highest FRAP values (mmol FeSO4/g DW) were obtained from the tea samples collected at 1st harvest time. The lowest FRAP values of the tea samples were found at 3rd harvest time, except for C. These values for the strategies T, Ka1, and Ka2 were determined to be 5.44 ± 0.31, 5.53 ± 0.16, 5.47 ± 0.16 mmol FeSO4/g DW, respectively, at 1st harvest; 5.44 ± 0.01, 5.37 ± 0.18, 5.42 ± 0.20 at 2nd harvest; and 5.16 ± 0.43, 5.36 ± 0.56, 5.00 ± 0.90 at 3rd harvest (Fig. 3; Table 1). FRAP values in C were 5.51 ± 0.23, 5.45 ± 0.09, 5.93 ± 0.45 mmol FeSO4/g DW at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harvest times, respectively (Table 1; Fig. 3).
Discussion
The results obtained from this study show that the kaolin applications on tea leaves enhanced the amount of total phenol content, DPPH radical scavenging capacity, and FRAP values of tea leaves at all three different harvest times.
The composition of bioactive compounds, and therefore antioxidant capacity of tea, might be influenced by several parameters associated with growth conditions: genetic strain, climatic conditions, soil profile, growth altitude, horticultural practices, or plucking season (Kosinska and Andlauer 2014). The temperature in the region, where tea is cultivated in Turkey, is high at 3rd harvest and low at 1st harvest. For this reason, the kaolin was applied before the 1st harvest where the temperature was low, which is effective in stress conditions, has a positive effect on the amount of the total phenolic content and antioxidant capacities of tea leaves in 1st harvest. Erturk et al. (2010) investigated the total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and mineral contents of seven tea clones cultivated in Turkey at different harvest times. The total phenolics of all clones were lower in cool months of May for two years. Thereafter, the levels of total phenolics increased throughout the warmer months from July to September. Ercisli et al. (2008) studied seasonal variation of total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and element assay in fresh tea leaves grown in Turkey. The highest values of total phenolics and antioxidant activity were obtained at 2nd harvest time. Jamal and his colleagues worked on seasonal variation of phenolic components in two clones of tea grown in Iran. The results of this study showed that phenolic components of both tea clones increased from 1st harvest to 3rd harvest (Mohammadian et al. 2014).
The yields and quality in tea cultivation are significantly affected by climate factors. It has been shown that the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds can be effectively induced by sunlight (Harbowy and Balentine 1997). Especially, precipitation, temperature, sunlight, day length, and moisture directly affect photosynthesis in tea plants; hence, it results in differences in quality and yield of tea in different harvest times. The effect of temperature on growth and yield of tea for different areas cannot be generalized as the optimum range would possibly vary depending on the overall environmental condition of an area (Panda 2011). Wijeratnc and Fordham (1996) reported that the decline in shoot extension rates appeared to begin with increasing temperatures above approximately 26 °C. In a multiple linear regression relationship with all three environmental factors, only the temperature effect was significant. In Turkey, quality and yield in tea plant are adversely affected by temperature under 13 °C and over 32 °C. That is why the total phenolic content and antioxidant capacities of tea samples in this study varied at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd harvest times. The great difference of tea leaves for antioxidant activity at different harvest times is supposed to be due to the effect of change of ecological parameters. It was previously reported that the composition of tea leaves varies with climate, variety, and age of the leaf (Leung and Foster 1996).
There are several studies reporting positive impact of kaolin application on plants. Dinis et al. (2016) investigated the effect of kaolin on the antioxidant system of grapevine (cv. Touriga Nacional) leaves and fruits extracts to summer stress, using chemical (ABTS, FRAP, DPPH) and biochemical methods. The results show that kaolin exogenous application enhanced the activity of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants systems, reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and lipid peroxidation levels (TBARS) and promoting the production of antioxidants, such as phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and vitamin C, which influence grapes quality. Also, in Merlot grape (Vitis vinifera L.), kaolin application enhanced the total amount of berry anthocyanins (Song et al. 2012).
Conclusion
Temperature, depending on its severity and duration, affects metabolic activities, growth, and development of plants, which limits the distribution of plants in countries and regions. Most plants generally develop at temperatures between 15 and 45 °C. The growth and metabolism of plants as well as the quality and quantity of the products are seriously affected under and above these temperatures. In Turkey, quality and yield in tea plant are adversely affected by temperature under 13 °C. These low temperatures, which are usually measured before the first harvest season, cause low tea quality in the harvest season. In this study, it was determined that the kaolin applications especially made during this period increased the phenolic content and antioxidant contents of tea samples. Kaolin has promising results for further studies.
References
An B, Kwak J, Son J, Park J, Lee JC, Byun M (2004) Biological and antimicrobial activity of irradiated green tea polyphenols. Food Chem 88:549–555
Baptista JAB, Tavares JFP, Carvalho RCB (1999) Comparative study and partial characterization of Azorean green tea polyphenols. J Food Comp Anal 12:273–287
Benzie IF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239(1):70–76
Bernardo SS (2015) Influence of kaolin particle film in antioxidant activities of leaf and berry extracts from Vitis vinifera L. (cv. Touriga Nacional). Dissertation, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Bu-Abbas A, Copeland E, Clifford MN, Walker R, Ioannides C (1997) Fractionation of green tea extracts: correlation of antimutagenic effect with flavanol content. J Sci Food Agr 75:453–462
Chen Z, Wang S, Lee KMS, Huang Y, Ho WKK (2001) Preparation of flavanol rich green tea extract by precipitation with AlCl3. J Sci Food Agr 81:1034–1038
Clifford MN, Copeland EL, Bloxsidge JP, Mitchell LA (2000) Hippuric acid as a major excretion product associated with black tea consumption. Xenobiotica 30:317–326
Dinis LT, Ferreira H, Pinto G, Bernardo S, Correia CM, Moutinho-Pereira J (2016) Kaolin-based, foliar reflective film protects photosystem II structure and function in grapevine leaves exposed to heat and high solar radiation. Photosynthetica 54(1):47–55
Ercisli S, Orhan E, Ozdemir O, Sengul M, Gungor N (2008) Seasonal variation of total phenolic, antioxidant activity, plant nutritional elements, and fatty acids in tea leaves (Camellia sinensis var. sinensis clone Derepazari 7) grown in Turkey. Pharm Biol 46(10–11):683–687
Erturk Y, Ercisli S, Sengul M, Eser Z, Haznedar A, Turan M (2010) Seasonal variation of total phenolic, antioxidant activity and minerals in fresh tea shoots (Camellia sinensis var. sinensis). Pak J Pharm Sci 23(1):69–74
Glenn DM, Puterka G, Vanderzwet T, Byers RE, Feldhake C (1999) Hydrophobic particle films: a new paradigm for suppression of arthropod pests and plant diseases. J Econ Entomol 92(4):759–771
Glenn DM, Puterka GJ, Drake SR, Unruh TR, Knight AL, Baherle P, Prado E, Baugher T (2001) Particle film application influences apple leaf physiology, fruit yield and fruit quality. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 126:175–181
Glenn DM, Prado E, Erez A, Mcferson J, Puterka GJ (2002) A reflective, processed-kaolin particle film affects fruit temperature, radiation reflection, and solar injury in apple. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 127(2):188–193
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiey, New York
Gramza A, Korczak J (2005) Tea constituents (Camellia sinensis L.) as antioxidants in lipid systems. Trends Food Sci Tech 16:351–358
Halder B, Pramanick S, Mukhopadhyoy S, Giri AK (2005) Inhibition of Benzo [a] pyrene induced mutagenicity and genotoxicity multiple test systems. Food Chem Toxicol 43:591–597
Han C (1997) Screening of anticarcinogenic ingredients in tea polyphenols. Cancer Lett 114:153–158
Harbowy ME, Balentine DA (1997) Tea chemistry. Crit Rev Plant Sci 16:415–480
Knight AL, Unruh TR, Christianson BA, Puterka GJ, Glenn DM (2000) Effects of kaolin-based particle films on obliquebanded leafroller, choristoneura rosaceana (Harris), (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 93(3):744–749
Kosinska A, Andlauer W (2014) Antioxidant capacity of tea: effect of processing and storage. In: Preedy V (ed) Processing and impact on antioxidants in beverages, Chapter 12. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 109–120
Leung AY, Foster S (1996) Encyclopedia of common natural ingredients used in food, drugs, and cosmetics. Wiley, New York
Mello LD, Alves AA, Macedo DV, Kubota LT (2005) Peroxidase-based biosensor as a tool for a fast evaluation of antioxidant capacity of tea. Food Chem 92:515–519
Mohammadian MA, Mosayebi M, Omidi MJ (2014) Seasonal variation of phenolic components in two clones of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O Kuntze). J Plant Biol (2008-8264). 6(20)
Navas PB, Carrasquero-Durán A, Flores I (2005) Effects of black tea, garlic and onion on corn oil stability and fatty acid composition under accelerated oxidation. Int J Food Sci Tech 40:1–5
Panda H (2011) The complete book on cultivation and manufacture of tea. Asia Pacific Business Press Inc, ISBN 8178331683, 9788178331683
Perva-Uzunalic A, Skerget M, Knez Z, Weinreich B, Otto F, Grüner S (2006) Extraction of active ingredients from green tea (Camellia sinensis): extraction efficiency of major catechins and caffeine. Food Chem 96:597–605
Puterka G, Glenn DM, Sekutowski DG, Unruh TR, Jones SK (2000a) Progress toward liquid formulations of particle films for insect and disease control in pear. Environ Entomol 29:329–339
Puterka GJ, Glenn DM, Sekutowski DG (2000b) Method for Protecting Surfaces from Arthropod Infestation. U.S. Patent No. 6,027, 740. Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, NJ
Row KH, Jin Y (2005) Recovery of catechin compounds from Korean tea by solvent extraction. Bioresource Technol 97:790–793
Saour G, Makee H (2003) Effects kaolin particle film on olive yield, oil content and quality. Advances in Horticultural Science 17(4):204–206
Sharma V, Gulati A, Ravindranath SD, Kumar V (2005) A simple and convenient method for analysis of tea biochemicals by reverse phase HPLC. J Food Comp Anal 18:583–594
Song J, Shellie KC, Wang H, Qian MC (2012) Influence of deficit irrigation and kaolin particle film on grape composition and volatile compounds in Merlot Grape (Vitis Vinifera L.). Food Chem 134(2):841–850
Topuz A, Dincer C, Torun M, Tontul I, Nadeem HŞ, Haznedar A, Özdemir F (2014) Physicochemical properties of Turkish green tea powder: effects of shooting period, shading, and clone. Turk J Agric For 38(2):233–241
Tworkoski TJ, Glenn DM, Puterka GJ (2002) Response of bean to applications of hydrophobic mineral particles. Can J Plant Sci 82:217–219
Unruh TR, Knight AL, Upton J, Glenn DM, Puterka GJ (2000) Particle films for suppression of the codling moth ((Cydia pomonella (L.)) in apple and pear orchards. J Econ Entomol 93(3):737–743
Waterhouse AL (2002) Determination of total phenolics. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, New York
Wijeratnc MA, Fordham R (1996) Effects of environmental factors on growth and yield of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) in the low-country wet zone of Sri Lanka. S. L. J. Tea Sci 64:21–34
Yang T, Li H, Hu X, Li J, Hu J, Liu R, Deng ZY (2014) Effects of fertilizing with N, P, Se, and Zn on regulating the element and functional component contents and antioxidant activity of tea leaves planted in red soil. J Agric Food Chem 62(17):3823–3830
Yao L, Jiang Y, Datta N, Singanusong R, Liu X, Duan J et al (2004) HPLC analyses of flavanols and phenolic acids in the fresh young shoots of tea (Camellia sinensis) grown in Australia. Food Chem 84:253–263
Yazıcı K, Kaynak L (2009) Effects of kaolin and shading treatments on sunburn in fruit of Hicaznar cultivar of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.cv. Hicaznar). doi:10.17660/ActaHortic2009.818.24
Zandi P, Gordon MH (1999) Antioxidant activity of extracts from old tea leaves. Food Chem 64:285–288
Zhu Y, Huang H, Tu Y (2005) A review of recent studies in China on the possible beneficial health effects of tea. Int J Food Sci Tech 41:333–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yazici, K., Goksu, B. Effects of Kaolin (M-99-099) Application on Antioxidant and Phenolic Compounds in Tea Leaves (Camellia sinensis L.O. Kuntze). Biochem Genet 55, 367–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-017-9805-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-017-9805-x