Abstract
Microbial fuel cells are used as an alternative source of energy and for microbial degradation of waste and pollutants. Different types of microbial fuel cells include sediment microbial fuel cells, waste treatment microbial fuel cells, constructed wetland microbial fuel cells and plant microbial fuel cells. Plant microbial fuel cells use plant–microbe relationships for producing bioelectricity. For this cell, the development of efficient, low-cost cathode is a key challenge. Here, a plant microbial fuel cell using algal-assisted cathode was designed. This cell uses rhizodeposits of plants as carbon source in the anode chamber and photosynthesis of algae to generate the oxygen that acts as a terminal electron acceptor in the cathode chamber. Results show that a maximum power density of 29.78 mW/m3 and a current density of 610 mA/m3 were recorded from the polarization curve during the light phase. The maximum voltage recorded was 399 mV in the light phase and 390 mV in the dark phase. This is the first design of a rice paddy-planted microbial fuel cell assisted with a blue-green algal cathode, capable of operating in self-sustainable mode using entirely natural processes without any external input of organics or oxidant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, plant microbial fuel cell has emerged as a promising clean technique for generating electricity from plants and their residues (Yadav 2010; Nitisoravut and Regmi 2017; Khudzari et al. 2018). In the plant microbial fuel cell, plants synthesize organics through photosynthesis, which is made available to the electrochemically active bacteria to generate electricity (Deng et al. 2012; Yadav et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2018). The electrochemically active bacteria present in the anode compartment of the plant microbial fuel cell convert organic compounds into carbon dioxide, protons and electrons. The electron goes to the anode electrode placed in the anode chamber. Subsequently, the electrons flow through an electrical circuit to the cathode electrode and are consumed by the oxygen and protons to form water molecules (Yadav et al. 2012; Mathuriya and Yakhmi 2014; Srivastava et al. 2018; Ilamathi and Jayapriya 2018). However, power produced in plant microbial fuel cell is still low for the real-world application. Non-efficient cathode reaction due to activation, ohmic and mass transport losses is assumed for low power production in plant microbial fuel cell and other microbial fuel cell (Rismani-Yazdi et al. 2008). Improvement in power generation and low-cost efficient cathode development are among the top major challenges for the real field application of plant microbial fuel cell (Chen et al. 2012). The ample availability of oxygen in the surrounding environment and its positive redox potential make it the most suitable electron acceptor for the cathode reaction (Chen et al. 2012; Zhao et al. 2006; Srivastava et al. 2017). Photosynthetic activities of algae are being used for producing in situ oxygen at the cathode of microbial fuel cell (Yadav et al. 2015).
This study designed and developed a rice paddy-planted microbial fuel cell with integration of algal (Cyanobacterium phormidium)-assisted cathode. It presents a system, which completely runs by natural processes. For imitating the real conditions, this study performed the experiment without adding the external carbon source, outside electrochemically active bacteria, or external oxidant. The electrochemically active bacteria present in the anode compartment were supported by the rice paddy plants for their carbon requirements. Similarly, the cathode reaction was supported by algal photosynthesis for their oxygen requirements.
Materials and methods
Microcosms setup and start-up of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode
Figure 1 shows the schematic of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode used in this study. A two-chamber plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode microcosm was designed and constructed in the laboratory. The anode chamber was constructed using a piece of polyvinyl chloride-based pipe (length 20 cm; φ 11.0 cm), and the cathode chamber was constructed using a transparent plastic rectangular container (length 22.5 cm, width 13.0 cm and height of 10.0 cm). Plastic flanges were bolted together to join these two chambers. A circular piece of Nafion 117 membrane (3.0 cm diameter) was placed between the flanges before bolting them. The anodic chamber was packed with 100 g of graphite granules (average size 0.5–1.0 cm, occupied volume of ~ 1370 ml) which act as an anode electrode. A square graphite rod (size of 2.2 cm length × 2.2 cm width × 12.5 cm height, surface area 116 cm2) connected with copper wire was inserted into the graphite granules to collect the electrons. In the cathode chamber, a piece of 0.8 mg/cm2 platinum-coated carbon cloth (6.0 cm width × 8.0 height cm, surface area 96 cm2) connected with copper wire was used as a cathode. The total volume of the cathode chamber was 1.0 l, whereas the void volume of the anode chamber after packing with graphite granules was 0.8 l. Open ends of the wire were attached using an external resistance.
In the cathode chamber, blue-green algae (Cyanobacterium phormidium) were grown using BG11 media for algal growth Stanier et al. (1971). 10.0 ml of a pre-grown culture of algae was used as inoculums. In the anode chamber, seven rice paddy plants (total weight of 9.6 g) were planted. These plants were collected from a 20-day-old rice paddy plant field situated near Nandankanan Zoological Park, Bhubaneswar. The rice variety was a short-duration variety (80–110 days). Such variety of rice plants spends about 50 days in the vegetative phase, 30 days in the reproductive phase and 30 days in the ripening phase. After collecting them from the field, they were brought to the laboratory and rinsed with tap water to remove the excess soil from the root areas. For plant growth, Hoagland’s solution was used in an anodic chamber. The composition of Hoagland’s solution was adopted from Hoagland and Arnon (1950). The said solution is a mixture of macronutrient and micronutrient (ml of stock solution for 1 l of Hoagland’s solution) as given here: stock (g/l): 202.0 KNO3, 2.5 ml/l; 472.0 Ca (NO3)2·4H2O, 2.5 ml/l; 15 iron (sprint 138 iron chelate), 1.5 ml/l; 493 MgSO4·7H2O, 1 ml/l; 80 NH4NO3 1 ml/l. Micronutrient stock (g/l): 2.86 H3BO3, 1 ml/l; 1.81 MnCl2·4H2O, 1 ml/l; 0.22 ZnSO4·7H2O, 1 ml/l; 0.051 CuSO4·5H2O, 1 ml/l; 0.09 H2MoO4·H2O, 1 ml/l; 0.12 Na2MoO4·2H2O, 1 ml/l and 136 KH2PO4 (pH 6.0), 0.5 ml/l. During the initial 4 weeks, the anode portion of microcosm was fed with a half portion of new Hoagland’s solution and a half portion of old used Hoagland’s solution for promoting and retaining the electrochemically active bacteria and attaching them to graphite granules. No external microbial inoculums were added in anode chamber as some of the native microorganisms were attached to roots and rhizospheric zone (Reid et al. 2017; Moronta-Barrios et al. 2018). Subsequently, all anode portion media were replaced with new media. During the remaining experimental period, media utilized in the anode chamber to support the plants growth were changed with new media every 48 h as voltage drops were observed after this period. Similarly, after the initial 15 days of algal growth without any change in the initially provided BG11 medium, the media were changed every 7 days to maintain the algae growth as algae die off observed after this period. Minimum wastage of algal biomass was assured by using filtration through Whatman filter paper, grade 1. Voltage was recorded four times a day, twice in the morning toward the end of the dark phase of 12 h and twice in the evening toward the end of the light phase of 12 h. A spiral white compact florescent bulb of 85 watts (light intensity of 5000 lm) was arranged to provide light to the whole experimental setup. This bulb was manually operated for creating the light and dark phases of the experiment. All the experiments were carried out at controlled room temperature of 27 °C ± 2 °C. Analyses of various samples were carried out in triplicates to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results.
Experimental details and analysis
Chemical oxygen demand and dissolved oxygen were measured according to the procedure given by the standard methods (APHA, WEF, 2005). pH was measured using a pH meter (Eutech Instruments CyberScan pH 1500, Eutech Instruments Pte Ltd, Singapore). The voltage (V) was measured using a digital handheld multimeter (Sanwa CD772, Sanwa Electric Instrument Co. Ltd, Japan) on a fixed resistance. Analysis of chemical oxygen demand of the anode solution was first performed at the starting stage (2nd week) and twice (4th and 6th week) in the middle of the experiment and lastly at the final period (13th week) of the experiment. Chemical oxygen demand of the initial Hoagland’s solution and the solution after 48 h contact with plants roots present in the anode chamber was analyzed. After acclimatization of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode, the experiment was run for another 13 weeks and continuously monitored for electricity generation. Polarization curve was drawn using resistances between 10,000 Ω and 1 Ω. The power (P) and current (I) were determined by basic electrical calculations using the standard relations. The power density and the current density were calculated by dividing the power and current with the volume (m3) of the used solution.
Result and discussion
Dissolved oxygen, pH and chemical oxygen demand
Dissolved oxygen level was always high in the cathode compartment while it was low in the anode compartment (Fig. 2). With the progression of the experiment, the level of dissolved oxygen concentration increased in the cathode compartment. However, in the anode compartment, dissolved oxygen concentration did not change and it slightly decreased. The above observation is understandable as with time, biomass at the root zone increased which can increase the utilization of the dissolved oxygen. In the case of the cathode compartment, more biomass leads to further photosynthesis and releases a higher amount of oxygen. The dissolved oxygen of the cathode was always high in the light condition due to photosynthetic activity of algae, whereas it was low in anode portion in both light and dark conditions. The initial dissolved oxygen of the cathode portion was 7.93 mg/l, and the anode portion was 2.16 mg/l. In the light condition, the highest measured dissolved oxygen was 10.19 mg/l in the cathode portion and 1.34 mg/l in the anode portion. In this study, the pH level at both the cathode and anode compartments was also measured. Initially, pH of the cathode portion increased from 6.5 to 8.3 during the acclimatization phase and in the initial phase (up to 20 days). Subsequently, it stabilized at 6.5 ± 0.3. pH of the anode portion was measured and found to be around 5.9 ± 0.2. A pH is an important parameter for the operation of microbial fuel cell, and it significantly affects the microbial growth as well as the growth of algae. Both of the organisms perform their vital functions across a limited pH condition. Acidic pH (in the range 3.0–6.2) and an alkaline pH (in the range 8.6–9.0) retard the growth of algae Sorensen et al. (1996). pH difference between both chambers increases the proton diffusion from anode to cathode chamber and plays an important role in the electricity generation Du et al. (2007). The previous study also depicted that the significant pH difference between anode and cathode may enhance the power output in microbial fuel cell (Jadhav and Ghangrekar 2009).
To measure the level of the organic substrate in liquid presented in the anode portion, chemical oxygen demand was measured. The initial chemical oxygen demand of the Hoagland’s solution utilized for plant growth was found to be 16.5 (± 4.39) mg/l. The chemical oxygen demand of the Hoagland’s solution after 48 h of contact period with plant roots in the 2nd, 4th, 6th and 13th week of the experiments was 20.18, 57.04, 216.31 and 512.74 mg/l, respectively. It is evident from the results that when rice paddy plants start aging, they release more organics from their root systems that ultimately become available to the electrochemically active bacteria.
Electricity generation
The voltage profile of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode is shown in Fig. 3a. Voltage generation by plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode was dynamic throughout the operational period. During the first week of the experiment, voltage generation increased in light phase and decreased in the dark phase. This trend gradually changed and voltage generation decreased in light phase and increased in dark phase from the 2nd week onwards. The same pattern was observed up to the 8th week of the experiment. Subsequently, there was a slight change in the trend, and again voltage generation increased in light phase and decreased in the dark phase. This pattern was not steady for a long period, and fluctuations were observed in dark and light phases. The pattern of voltage generation in plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode was similar to voltage production reported by (He et al. 2009). It was also observed at some point that the voltage generation was higher in the dark phase as compared to the light phase. Juang et al. (2012) and Yadav et al. (2015) also reported similar trends while using algae in an microbial fuel cell’s cathode. An hourly voltage profile for 10 h in the light phase was recorded to measure the effect of light on the reactor performance (Fig. 3b). When the light was turned on, the recorded voltage was 159 mv in the starting phase. It was observed that voltage decreased sharply during the first 2 h, and then, there was a sudden rise in voltage and subsequently a fall in the voltage. There was no voltage generation pattern; however, it can be seen that a long-time exposure to light leads to a decrease in voltage generation. Wu et al. (2013) also reported that a long-time exposure to light may lead to the production of oxygen generation and may enhance electricity production. However, extended exposure to light decreases electricity generation. The performance of various plant microbial fuel cells studied in recent years with Hoagland’s solution was compiled and is presented in Table 1. Overall, all performances of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode are notable among listed studies, although the reported value of plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode is normalized over volume of the anode chamber.
Polarization curve was also recorded in the 9th week of the experiments and is presented in Fig. 3. Important information on major losses such as activation loss, ohmic loss and concentration loss, which hinder the current production, can be extracted from a polarization curve. Srivastava et al. (2015) described the important characteristic features of the polarization curve. They concluded that the first initial sharp drop in voltage reflects the activation losses; second, slow linear-like fall in voltage represents the ohmic losses; and third, fast drop in the voltage at higher current directs the concentration losses. Figure 4 shows that the plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode microcosm suffers all three major losses. Figure 4 also follows the classical trend where voltage drops with drops in applied resistor loads Srivastava et al. (2015).
Conclusions
The present study successfully demonstrates a low-cost algal-assisted oxygen generation for cathode reaction and rhizodeposits and root exudates of rice paddy plant-based carbon supply as fuel for anode reaction. Further research on other aspects of the current technology such as the effect of greenhouse gas emission from rice paddy plant at anode portion and carbon dioxide utilization at the cathode portion is needed to examine other advantages of using plant microbial fuel cell assisted with algae cathode.
References
APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-0875530475
Bombelli P, Iyer DMR, Covshoff S, McCormick AJ, Yunus K, Hibberd JM (2013) Comparison of power output by rice (Oryza sativa) and an associated weed (Echinochloa glabrescens) in vascular plant bio-photovoltaic (VP-BPV) systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4473-6
Chen Z, Huang YC, Liang JH, Zhao F, Zhu YG (2012) A novel sediment microbial fuel cell with a biocathode in the rice rhizosphere. Biores Technol 108:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.040
Deng H, Zheng C, Zhao F (2012) Energy from plants and microorganisms: progress in plant-microbial fuel cells. Chem Sus Chem 5:1006–1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100257
Du H, Li H, Gu T (2007) State of the art review on microbial fuel cells: a promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnol Adv 25:464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.05.004
Habibul N, Hu Y, Wang YK, Chen W, Yu HQ, Sheng GP (2016) Bioelectrochemical chromium(VI) removal in plant-microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 50:3882–3889. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06376
He Z, Kan J, Mansfeld F, Angennt LT, Nealson KH (2009) Self-sustained phototrophic microbial fuel cells based on the synergistic cooperation between photosynthetic microorganisms and heterotrophic bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 43:1648–1654. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803084a
Helder M, Strik DPBTB, Hamelers HVM, Kuhn AJ, Blok C, Buisman CJ (2010) Concurrent bioelectricity and biomass production in three plant-microbial fuel cells using Spartina anglica, Arundinella anomala and Arundo donax. Bioresour Technol 101:3541–3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.124
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method of growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ 347:1–32
Ilamathi R, Jayapriya J (2018) Microbial fuel cells for dye decolorization. Environ Chem Lett 16:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0669-4
Jadhav GS, Ghangrekar MM (2009) Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. Biores Technol 100:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.041
Juang DF, Lee CH, Hsueh SC (2012) Comparison of electrogenic capabilities of microbial fuel cell with different light power on algae grown cathode. BioresourTechnol 123:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.041
Kaku N, Yonezawa N, Kodama Y, Watanabe K (2008) Plant/microbe cooperation for electricity generation in a rice paddy field. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1410-9
Khudzari JM, Kurian J, Gariépy Y, Tartakovsky B, Raghavan GSV (2018) Effects of salinity, growing media, and photoperiod on bioelectricity production in plant microbial fuel cells with weeping alkaligrass. Biomass Bioenerg 109:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.013
Mathuriya AS, Yakhmi JV (2014) Microbial fuel cells to recover heavy metals. Environ Chem Lett 12:483–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-014-0474-2
Moronta-Barrios F, Gionechetti F, Pallavicini A, Marys E, Venturi V (2018) Bacterial microbiota of rice roots: 16S-based taxonomic profiling of endophytic and rhizospheric diversity, endophytes isolation and simplified endophytic community. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6010014
Nitisoravut R, Regmi R (2017) Plant microbial fuel cells: a promising biosystems engineering. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.064
Reid MC, Maillard J, Bagnoud A, Falquet L, Vo PL, Bernier-Latmani R (2017) Arsenic methylation dynamics in a rice paddy soil anaerobic enrichment culture. Environ Sci Technol 51:10546–10554. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02970
Rismani-Yazdi H, Carver SM, Christy AD, Tuovinen OH (2008) Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: an overview. J Power Sources 180:683–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.07
Sorensen BH, Nyholm N, Baun A (1996) Algal toxicity tests with volatile and hazardous compounds in air-tight test flasks with CO2 enriched headspace. Chemosphere 32:1513–15521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00059-8
Srivastava P, Mishra BK, Yadav AK (2015) The effects of microbial fuel cell integration into constructed wetland on the performance of constructed wetland. Biores Technol 195:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.072
Srivastava P, Dwivedi S, Kumar N, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Yadav AK (2017) Performance assessment of aeration and radial oxygen loss assisted cathode based integrated constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell systems. Biores Technol 224:1178–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.026
Srivastava P, Yadav AK, Garaniya V, Abbassi R (2018) Constructed wetland coupled microbial fuel cell technology development and potential applications. In: Mohan SV, Varjani S, Pandey A (eds) Biomass, Biofuels and Biochemicals, Microbial Electrochemical Technology, 1st edn. Elsevier B.V. pp 1021–1036
Stanier RY, Kunisawa R, Mandel M, CohenBazire G (1971) Purification and properties of unicellular blue green algae (Order Chroococcales). Bacteriol Rev 35:171–205
Strik DP, Snel JF, Buisman CJ (2008) Green electricity production with living plants and bacteria in a fuel cell. Int J Energy Res 32:870–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1397
Takanezawa K, Nishio K, Kato S, Hashimoto K, Watanabe K (2010) Factors affecting electric output from rice paddy microbial fuel cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74:1271–1273. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.90852
Timmers RA, Strik DPBTB, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2010) Long-term performance of a plant microbial fuel cell with Spartina anglica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:973–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2440-7
Wang Y, Chen Y, Wen Q (2018) Microbial fuel cells: enhancement with polyaniline/carbon felt capacitive bioanode and reduction of Cr(VI) using the intermittent operation. Environ Chem Lett 16:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0678-3
Wu XY, Song TS, Zhu XJ, Wei P, Zhou CC (2013) Construction and operation of microbial fuel cell with Chlorella vulgaris biocathode for electricity generation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171:2082–2092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0476-8
Yadav AK (2010) Design and development of novel constructed wetland cum microbial fuel cell for electricity production and wastewater treatment. In: Proceedings of the 12th IWA international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control 2010, Venice, Italy, 4–9 October
Yadav AK, Dash P, Mohanty A, Abbassi R, Mishra BK (2012) Performance assessment of innovative constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell for electricity production and dye removal. Ecol Eng 47:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.029
Yadav AK, Nayak SK, Acharya BC, Mishra BK (2015) Algal-assisted microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation. Energy Sour A Recovery Util Environ Effect 372:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.576422
Yadav AK, Srivastava P, Kumar N, Abbassi R, Mishra BK (2018) Constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell- an emerging integrated technology for potential industrial wastewater treatment and bio-electricity generation. In: Alexandros S (ed) Constructed Wetlands for Industrial Wastewater Treatment, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 493–510
Zhao F, Harnisch F, Schrçder U, Scholz F, Bogdanoff P, Herrmann I (2006) Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:5193–5199. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060332p
Acknowledgements
PS sincerely thanks the financial support received from the University of Tasmania. AKY greatly acknowledges SERB, Government of India for Fast Track Project Grant (SR/FTP/ETA-0058/2011). Other researchers would also like to acknowledge the Grant received from the Tasmanian Community Fund (31Medium00171).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, P., Gupta, S., Garaniya, V. et al. Up to 399 mV bioelectricity generated by a rice paddy-planted microbial fuel cell assisted with a blue-green algal cathode. Environ Chem Lett 17, 1045–1051 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-00824-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-00824-2