Abstract
This work presents a survey on the management of the home medical care waste (HMCW) from the municipality of Caruaru, an important medical and economic center in the Brazilian Agreste. The cross-sectional study was conducted on 67 stakeholders (health professionals and patients/caregivers), who were interviewed in the work environment (headquarters of the home medical care and/or residence they assisted). The results revealed that more than 55% of the caregivers are of the female gender and more than 30% present a first-degree family bond with the patient. The estimated mean generation of HMCW was of 1.68 kg/patient per month, with segregated collection and proper disposal of sharp materials only (0.8 kg per month ≈ 1%). The remainder of the HMCW is discarded together with the common waste generated in the residence. The lack of standardization in both caregiver guidance and the training of health professionals is a limiting factor for the correct management of HMCW. The municipality should integrate HMCW management to the regular medical waste management to comply with the current legislation, protecting the environment and public health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Home medical care (HMC) is a multidisciplinary service which involves a series of procedures performed by health professionals in the domestic environment, encompassing from the short-term care to complex and long-term activities, such as the advanced treatment of chronic diseases [1]. Given population aging and the increase in the number of people in need of ongoing care, HMCs have been giving an important support to the health systems in the reduction of the saturation in hospitals and in the improvement of the patients’ life quality [2], especially in the developing countries.
According to Zikhathile and Atagana [3], South Africa acknowledges HMCs as a strategy to relieve the burden on health services, while maintaining the necessary care for the community. In Brazil, 1157 public HMC teams act in the national territory, by multi-professional groups (doctors, nurses, physiotherapists and nursing technicians) and home caregivers [4]. In Japan, with the rise in life expectancy, home care has become a basic requirement for the population, reaching 4655 HMC offices in 2016 [5]. In the United States, more than 2.1 million home care workers provide personal assistance, in home and community environments [6].
Despite the countless benefits, the growing trend of home health service provision has resulted in the inappropriate discard of potentially harmful waste, resulting from the procedures, especially in less developed countries. According to the World Health Organization, medical waste is defined as all waste generated in health facilities, research centers, laboratories of medical procedures and smaller and scattered sources, such as home medical care waste (HMCW), and it stands out due to the potential risk that a portion of waste (10–25%) poses to health and the environment [7].
Although the basis of discussion on medical waste management is related to the spaces that provide health services (hospitals, clinics and similar), since they are the main producers, there is a growing concern regarding home health care which, sometimes, are complex, prolonged and capable of generating medical waste. When not managed correctly, medical waste can be a vehicle for the spread of infections and the transmission of diseases, by direct and indirect contact, in the environment [8]. HMCW can enter the flow of the municipal solid waste, transforming common waste into potentially infectious, resulting in an increase in the cost of the treatment and discard. Ikeda [5] highlights that the rates of infectious medical waste collection derived from HMC, in big Japanese cities, were low compared to the small cities. Ikeda et al. [9] highlight that, after 13 years, despite improvements in the collection of HMCW, educational actions for the management of this waste are still needed.
There are still few studies on HMCW management. Miyazaki et al. [8] demonstrate accidents suffered by people who work with collection, when transporting HMCW in Japan. Markkanen et al. [10] show that the diverse practices of discard and the reuse of sharp waste (for cost savings or convenience) have intensified the dangers for caregivers, waste handlers and community members in the USA.
HMCW management represents a challenge that is still bigger to the developing countries, considering the limitations of technical, financial and human resources, besides the lack of investment and clear policies [11, 12]. As a consequence, the studies of Hangulu and Akintola [11], Kang’ethe [13] and Zikhathile and Atagana [3] show the inappropriate discard of HMCW together with domestic waste, in open places, buried or burned.
In Brazil, medical waste management is regulated by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency [14] and by the National Environment Council [15]. The Brazilian legislation holds the medical waste service provider (considered as waste generator), either private or public (municipality), responsible for the appropriate management and disposal of medical care waste (MCW). The generators of MCW must prepare a document (management plan) showing all steps of management (segregation, storage, collection and transport, treatment and discard), according to MCW typology (whether dangerous by composition—biological, chemical, radiological risks or if sharp—or not dangerous), considering the prevention of work accidents, impacts on public health and damages to the environment [14]. Despite the current legislation, MCW management in Brazil is still alarming, since a good part of the waste has inappropriate disposal. According to ABRELPE [16], the main destinations of MCW in Brazil are: (i) incineration (43.4%); (ii) autoclaving (21.6%); (iii) microwave (4.8%); and (iv) sanitary landfills, septic ditches or dumpsites, without previous treatment (30.2%).
The legislation described above for MCW management is also applied to HMCW management. The MCW produced in households must be managed (stored, identified, collected, treated and disposed) in a correct way by the service provider, being it either private or public (municipality) [14, 15]. Nonetheless, in municipal HMC, the disposal of HMCW together with domestic waste (with the collection of only the sharp waste by the HMC teams, at the moment of service) is a very common situation, as shown by Alves et al. [17], Cordeiro et al. [18], Silva et al. [19] and Siqueira and Consoni [20].
The described overview shows a real need for research on HMCW management, given the importance and the growth of the service which complements primary health care, in Brazil [4], especially, in medium and large cities. Caruaru, a medium-sized municipality, considered the largest medical center in the region of the Central Agreste in the state of Pernambuco (Brazil), has a network composed of three HMC teams to meet a population of 365,278 inhabitants [21]. Caruaru is one of the most important municipalities that compose the textile chain in Brazil, with the 6th highest GDP in the state of Pernambuco. Given its strategic importance, Caruaru has become an attractive municipality for the migration of people from surrounding municipalities who seek job opportunities in the textile sector and better medical care conditions, overloading the city’s infrastructure. Given the exposed, the municipality of Caruaru was used as the place for the performance of a survey on the management of the HMCW from public health services.
In addition to the important contribution to the research on the management of this type of waste, the results of this work can guide service provision, assisting public authorities to formulate plans and strategies for the correct management of HMCW.
Materials and methods
Study area
Caruaru, located in the Northeast region of Brazil, is the most populous municipality in the interior of the state of Pernambuco, with an estimated population of 369,343 inhabitants in 2021, distributed in a territory of 923 km2 [22]. With the Human Development Index (HDI) of 0.677 and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 7.14 billion [21], Caruaru was selected for the study, for its prominence as one of the most important economic, cultural, academic, tourist and medical-hospital centers in the region.
Caruaru, with 517 public health units (general hospitals, specialized hospitals, clinics, basic health units, among others), is the second largest medical referral center in the State of Pernambuco, only behind the capital [21]. Widely distributed in the Brazilian municipalities, HMCs are inserted in the public health units as a modality integrated to the network of basic health units in the country. Figure 1 shows the comprehensiveness of the three HMC units, within the urban zone of Caruaru.
Each HMC team in Caruaru (HMC1, HMC2 and HMC3) is composed of one doctor, one nurse, one physiotherapist and three nursing technicians. The teams provide complementary services to those performed in fixed health units, such as dressings, drug administration and collection of material for exams. The frequency of HMC visits is weekly, and it can be daily, based on the user’s demands. HMC acknowledges the caregiver, who can be a family member or a friend, as a key actor in the continuity of home health care.
Research design
The study used a cross-sectional design to obtain quantitative and qualitative data, applying questionnaires, secondary data, interviews with the health professionals and field visits (headquarters of the HMC teams and assisted residences). The study encompassed the three HMCs in the municipality of Caruaru, with all health professionals (18 health professionals) and all caregivers/patients (49 caregivers/patients), as shown in Fig. 1, who were receiving home visits in the period from October to December 2019. In this period, structured (questionnaire) and semi-structured (with open questions) interviews were performed, described in the section “Data collection and analysis” below.
Data collection and analysis
As a tool for data collection, interviews with open questions and of multiple choice (questionnaires) were used. The interviews were developed based on literature review, as well as national [14, 15] and international guidelines on medical waste [7], according to the target group (HMC health professionals and caregivers/patients).
The interviews of the health professionals were subdivided into three sections, with questions referring: (i) to the sociodemographic characteristics (multiple choice—gender, profession, work history, professional qualification); (ii) to the communication and training relationships between the HMC teams and the caregivers (open questions/multiple choice); and (iii) to the knowledge, attitudes and practices of HMCW management and characterization (open questions/multiple choice). The interview of the caregivers/patients addressed sociodemographic questions (gender, age, schooling, occupation) and the main management practices of the waste generated in daily care (open questions/multiple choice). All interviews were conducted personally and individually. The health professionals answered in the workplaces of each HMC and the caregivers, in the patients’ residences, during the visits with the HMC health teams.
At the time of the visits to the residences for the interviews, the practices in service provision and medical waste management were observed. Monthly, the HMC teams request a list of materials (medical-hospital supplies, supplies and medicines necessary to perform the home medical services) to the Health Secretariat of Caruaru. Based on the data provided in the materials lists, it was possible to estimate, albeit indirectly and conservatively, the amount of waste generated at each HMC, in the period of study. For this, the amount of material requested was considered, as well as the weight of each item, obtained by direct weighing (on an electronic scale) or on the packaging information.
Ethical considerations
The ethical approval was obtained by the Research Ethics Committee (CET) of the Federal University of Pernambuco (CAAE: 13,311,719.0.0000.5208). Before data collection, the consent form informing the purpose of the study, the free decision to participate or refuse and the guarantee in relation to the data for research purposes was made available to all participants. This procedure was necessary so that, within the ethical standards, the integrity and dignity of the people involved in the study were preserved. All respondents were informed they could withdraw from the study at any time.
Results and discussion
Sociodemographic characterization of those involved in the research
Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of those involved in the research. Most of the caregivers is of the female gender, with percentages superior to 86% in HMC1 and HMC3. Regarding the age group, 66.7% of the caregivers of HMC1, 50% of HMC2 and 55.6% of HMC3 were between 40 and 59 years old.
A significant number of the caregivers have first-degree family bonds (daughters/sons) with the patients in HMC1 (46.7%) and HMC3 (61.1%). In HMC2, most of them were the patient’s spouse (43.8%). Home care has, as a criterion for the inclusion of patients, the presence of the caregiver in the daily activities, so there will be no rupture of the care provided by the HMC. In this study, most of the caregivers were exclusively dedicated to the patient, having declared they did not work outside home, especially in HMC1 and HMC2, which presented a percentage equal or superior to 80%. The prevalence of patients considered elderly (above 60 years old), according to the Brazilian legislation [23], in the three HMCs, 73.3%, 62.5% and 88.9, respectively, validates the need for palliative care and the importance of the home medical care services.
Regarding the level of schooling, the percentage of the caregivers who did not enter or did not complete high school in HMC1 (80%), HMC2 (56.3%) and HMC3 (55.6%) reinforces the need for a greater encouragement to conduct an educational and illustrative work for the care with the patient’s health. The creation of support networks, by actions of education and knowledge on health and waste management, are important mechanisms to strengthen the interaction among caregivers, patients and home health professionals, considering that the care practices and waste management remain, after the visits of the HMC team. Zikhathile and Atagana [3] verified that, in South Africa, most of the home caregivers had not completed high school; nevertheless, around 60% had complete primary education, and thus they could be educated in terms of home care and the risks associated to medical waste.
Regarding family income, the predominance of families with an income of up to one minimum wage was observed in all HMCs, 50% of which in HMC3, the highest percentage, followed by HMC1 with 46.7% and HMC2 with 37.5%. The average income of the families was of 1.64 minimum wages, a value close to the result found by IBGE [22], for the average monthly wage in the municipality of Caruaru, of 1.7 minimum wages.
Regarding health professionals, a predominance of the female gender is observed in all HMCs, except for HMC3. Half of the health professionals of HMC1 and HMC3 had 5–10 years of experience providing this service. HMC2 had professionals with working time from less than 1 year (33.3%) to more than 10 years (16.7%).
All health professionals who claimed they had specializations in the areas of professional practice in HMC1 (33.3%), HMC2 (50%) and HMC3 (50%) were graduated (Table 1). It is highlighted that one graduated professional in HMC1 and all professionals at the technical level did not mention specializations or complementary courses in the field of graduation.
Medical waste generation and management practices in the HMCs
The procedures derived from home health care (including those performed by the HMC teams and those performed by the caregivers) demand equipment, materials and medicines that, according to the legislation, must be supplied by the healthcare provider [24]. The Health Secretariat of the municipality of Caruaru provides the inputs monthly requested by the HMC teams for the provision of the service at home, as presented in Fig. 2.
The types and amounts of materials requested vary according to the procedures and the clinical profile of each patient. In the period of study, the inputs requested by the HMC teams were very similar, in quality and quantity, demonstrating that the patients have equivalent needs.
Based on the lists of requested inputs, it was possible to estimate the amount of waste generated, monthly. Table 2 demonstrates that the materials for dressing (gauze and bandages) and gloves were the most requested inputs in terms of mass (kg) and, consequently, the waste derived from their use, considered potentially infectious by the Brazilian legislation, are the most produced by each HMC. Alves et al. [17] demonstrated that the inputs used in dressings (46.6%) and sharp material waste (22.2%) were the main wastes generated from home care in the municipality of Goiânia (Brazil). Cordeiro et al. [18] also highlighted the strong presence of inputs used in dressings and sharp materials in home care in Ribeirão Preto (Brazil).
The teams from HMC1, HMC2 and HMC3 demanded, on average, 27.4 kg, 31.2 kg and 23.8 kg of materials per month, respectively. The materials used in the procedures become wastes with potential risk, because of the presence of biological agents (in surgical gloves, bandages, compresses, catheters etc.), chemical substances (in bottles and medicine remains) and sharp materials (blades, needles and lancets). Using the data from Table 2 and considering, conservatively, that all materials which were used in home care were converted into waste, a production of 1.83, 1.95 and 1.32 kg/patient/month in HMC1, HMC2 and HMC3, respectively, can be estimated, based on the number of patients assisted by each HMC in the period, with a total mean of 1.68 kg/patient/month and total production of 82.4 kg/month. The materials with a possible presence of biological agents represent 73.5% of the waste produced daily by HMC (Table 2). According to the World Health Organization [7], biological waste must always be considered as a waste with potential presence of pathogenic microorganisms, which happens because the presence or absence of pathogens cannot be decisive at the moment the waste is produced or discarded.
Except for the sharp waste, collected after the procedures performed by the HMC team, all residues (used gloves, probes, gauze and cotton, as well as leftover medication) were left in the residences for disposal by the family. Since there was no selective collection for these materials, the disposal used to be performed together with ordinary waste which, subsequently, was collected by the municipality and sent to sanitary landfills for non-hazardous household waste.
Regarding to the sharp materials, there is a particular concern because of the capacity of transmitting diseases and the occupational risk for all individuals who handle or come into contact with the waste. Matee and Manyele [25] highlighted the sharp waste as the most lethal and dangerous among the health waste, given their capacity of lacerating the skin and causing infections. Therefore, despite representing, in terms of mass, a smaller percentage (1%) (Table 2) among the home medical waste, sharp materials occupy a place of prominence, not necessarily by the amount generated, but by the potential risk they present to the environment and public health. Only the sharp waste, used at the moment of the visit of the HMC teams, were stored in rigid collectors (specific for sharp waste) and collected for destination together with other health service wastes generated by the municipality. Other sharp waste, used in the daily procedures of the family, such as those of self-administration of insulin and self-monitoring of blood glucose, were also discarded together with the ordinary domestic waste. The practice of collection of only sharp waste, generated in the service of the HMC teams, is also shown in the study of Siqueira and Consoni [20] in HMCs in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo, Brazil. The potentially pathogenic waste, when incorrectly discarded together with the common waste produced in the residences, results in contamination of the common waste, increasing the volume of potentially dangerous waste.
In countries such as South Africa, Ghana and Botswana, HMCW is discarded together with the common domestic waste, burned or buried [3, 12, 13, 26]. Sonmez et al. [27] verified that 84.1% of the caregivers used to discard home medical waste together with domestic waste, in the city of Kahramanmaras (Turkey). It is also highlighted that the inappropriate discard of home medical waste poses a risk to the health of waste pickers and garbage collection workers. In Japan, municipal collection workers were concerned about accidents when collecting or transporting waste, where 33.9% of the 59 municipal governments have reported accidents and almost all of them have experienced accidents with needles [8].
The data obtained in the visits and interviews reveal that a part of the HMCW is eventually discarded as ordinary domestic waste, transforming the waste into potentially dangerous. Furthermore, the lack of specific containers for the storage of HMCW in the residences makes segregation difficult. As a result, there is a failure to comply with the global policies of the World Health Organization which claim that, when the patients are sent for recovery in their own residences, the health service provider must provide to the patients the resources necessary for the correct storage, collection and discard of the HMCW [7].
The interviewed health professionals also claimed to have difficulties in using the HMC car to transport the technical team, the inputs and, at the same time, the sharp waste generated in the residences they visited. A similar challenge was discussed by Ikeda ([28] in Japan, indicating the concerns of the nurses in relation to possible injuries and bad smells of the transported waste. Kang’ethe [13] also reported the physical difficulties of health professionals in transporting, on foot, health waste to clinics.
Qualification for the management of home medical care waste
Figure 3 shows a summary of the perception, awareness and management of HMCW. More than 65% of the HMC professionals reported they had not received any qualification/training for HMCW management, in the last 5 years. Many of these professionals are in the HMC teams for less than 5 years, although they routinely deal with this type of waste. Most of the professionals who have received qualification/training for HMCW management were nursing technicians.
Nursing technicians are also a majority among the HMC professionals and, besides being on the front line, they perform the greatest part of the visits. In a study performed in Shiraz, South of Iran, Lakbala and Lakbala [29] report that all interviewees (doctors, paramedic teams, nurses, assistants and other workers, such as cleaning and administration staff) were aware of the policies on medical waste in hospitals, regardless of their level of schooling. Odonkor and Mahami [30] verified that a high level of knowledge and the practice of a safe disposal of biomedical waste are related to a higher incentive to training programs and not, necessarily, the degree of schooling.
Although HMC teams do not collect HMCW, 50%, 33.3% and 50% of the health professionals of HMC1, HMC2 and HMC3, respectively, informed they provided some guidance to the caregivers in relation to the storage of HMCW, such as the use of gloves when handling the waste, plastic bag and individual bin in the patient’s room, to prevent the waste generated in home care from being mixed with the waste produced in the other domestic environments. Although more than 30% of the HMC professionals used to guide the caregivers regarding HMCW management, there is a lack of standardization of the procedure among the HMCs themselves. The lack of guidelines for HMCW management results in the adoption of specific actions by the health professionals, which derive from their level of knowledge on the subject.
According to Hangulu and Akintola [26], the lack of funding, training and clear policies on HMCW results in the management practices of this waste staying, sometimes, at the discretion of the health professionals. Furthermore, the lack of published reports on the damage associated with the flow of hazardous waste in residences contributes to the negligence in managing this type of waste, especially in developing countries [12].
In the HMCs of Caruaru, the small number of professionals trained for the guidance on HMCW handling, together with a low degree of instruction of the caregivers (more than 50% did not enter/conclude high school), suggest the need for a program of permanent education, and extensive to all HMC professionals, caregivers and patients. The training of the human resources involved in MCW management is mandatory and must be included in the management plans for this type of waste in Brazil [14]. The preparation of a plan for medical waste management must be developed by the health teams or managers, so it can be implemented to assist all those involved in the service, including caregivers, since they receive inputs from the health teams and handle waste without the presence of home care professionals, during daily care [24].
Figure 3 also shows that 16.7% of the HMC1 professionals, 50% of HMC2 and 33.3% of HMC3 have witnessed or suffered accidents in HMCW management, especially with sharp materials, at the time of home care. All professionals who have witnessed or suffered accidents in the domestic work environment were nursing professionals, 80% of whom were nursing technicians, and 20% nurses. Marziale et al. [31] identified, by the electronic protocol records of the network for the prevention of accidents at work, that the health professionals, especially those of nursing, suffer accidents 21.4% of the times, performing the discard of sharp materials.
Regarding the main barriers for the correct HMCW management, the health professionals highlighted: (i) lack of a route for the collection and transport of HMCW, for 25% (HMC1) and 50% (HMC2). According to Sonmez et al. [27], the training of caregivers, although necessary, becomes insufficient without a collection system provided by the municipalities, especially when the caregivers handle the waste without the presence of the home care professionals. Miyazaki et al. [8] highlight the establishment of improved rules for the collection and transport of HMCW, besides the standardization of the service and cooperation of health workers, municipal governments and environmental agencies in Japan; and (ii) assuming the public power performs the collection, the lack of knowledge by the caregivers on the risk of the medical waste for most of the HMC health professionals may be an obstacle to the correct waste management.
Markkanen et al. [10], in a study performed in the United States, reported the importance of intervention at the beginning of the system for the disposal of sharp materials at home, demonstrating that many patients, especially the diabetics, reuse sharp materials, such as needles, for cost savings or for convenience. This practice represents an occupational risk for both the users and the home care professionals who find these types of materials unexpectedly unprotected in the bed linen, cushions, chairs and tables of the assisted residences.
Ikeda [32] highlights that the schooling of nursing professionals is a key element in the guidance of the caregiver/patient in relation to health waste. In Japan, more than 75% of the public and private professionals advised their patients about segregation and storage, and almost 50% advised them regarding the discard of health waste. The work from Stokes et al. [33], in surgery clinics of the University of Utah (USA), indicated that the patients in the post-operative period, who received a kit for the discard of opioids and an educational booklet, started to discard it correctly after the incentive.
Conclusion
The study provided an overview on HMCW management, showing management practices, estimates of waste generation and knowledge of the parts involved in the process. The home health caregiver is, predominantly, of the female gender, between 40 and 59 years old, with low level of education, with a first-degree family bond and takes care of elderly patients (above 60 years old).
The mean generation of HMCW was estimated in 1.68 kg/patient/month, based on the materials requested for home care. The health teams collect the sharp waste generated during home care to discard it together with the medical waste generated in the municipal hospitals and health centers. The other HMCW produced, during or after assistance, is discarded by the caregivers as home waste. The lack of standardization in the guidance of caregivers and in the training of health professionals, even when they present a higher degree of education, is one of the limiting factors to the correct management of HMCW.
A higher educational incentive, training programs and a higher involvement of the stakeholders in the creation of an awareness of the risks inherent in the inappropriate handling and disposal of HMCW are some of the measures to improve the management of this waste, preserving the health and safety of professionals, families and patients. The patients/caregivers could be advised to separate the waste for the home care team to collect during the visits. Furthermore, a greater involvement of the municipal managers in the standardization of HMCW management and a well-structured collection must be established in the municipality, for all people involved to know their roles and responsibilities.
The data and observations resulting from this research refer to the survey period. Despite this possible limitation, this study presents real data that can be used by municipalities in proposing guidelines for the correct management of HMCW in Brazil.
References
WHO (2015) The growing need for home health care for the elderly: Home health care for the elderly as an integral part of primary health care services. World Health Organization, Geneva
Di Mascolo M, Espinouse ML, ElHajri Z (2017) Planning in home health care structures: a literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50:4654–4659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.689
Zikhathile T, Atagana H (2018) Challenges facing home-based Caregivers in the management of health care risk waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122700
MS (2020) Atendimento em casa: 410 novas equipes habilitadas. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2020/janeiro/atendimento-em-casa-410-novas-equipes-habilitadas. Accessed 21 May 2021
Ikeda Y (2017) Current home medical care waste collection status by nurse in Japan. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 67:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1228551
McCall S (2018) U.S. home care workers: key facts. Quality Care Through Quality Jobs, New York
WHO (2014) Safe management of wastes from health care activities. World Health Organization, Geneva
Miyazaki M, Imatoh T, Une H (2007) The treatment of infectious waste arising from home health and medical care services: present situation in Japan. Waste Manag 27:130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.018
Ikeda Y, Fujiwara H, Sasaki M (2021) Is there a difference between urban and rural areas in the disposal of home medical care waste? 13 years of nation-wide repeated cross-sectional study in Japan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01132-0
Markkanen P, Galligan C, Laramie A et al (2015) Understanding sharps injuries in home healthcare: the safe home care qualitative methods study to identify pathways for injury prevention. BMC Public Health 15:359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1673-x
Hangulu L, Akintola O (2017) Perspectives of policy-makers and stakeholders about health care waste management in community-based care in South Africa: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 17:448. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2236-x
Udofia EA, Gulis G, Fobil J (2017) Solid medical waste: a cross sectional study of household disposal practices and reported harm in Southern Ghana. BMC Public Health 17:464. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4366-9
Kang’ethe SM, (2008) Clinical waste management in the context of the Kanye community home-based care programme, Botswana. African J AIDS Res 7:187–194. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJAR.2008.7.2.4.521
ANVISA (2018) Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada - RDC n° 222, de 28 de março de 2018. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.in.gov.br/web/guest/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/8436198/do1-2018-03-29-resolucao-rdc-n-222-de-28-de-marco-de-2018-8436194. Accessed 28 Mar 2021
CONAMA (2005) Resolução Conama n° 358 de 29 de abril de 2005. Diário Oficial da União. http://www.siam.mg.gov.br/sla/download.pdf?idNorma=5046. Accessed 21 Apr 2021
ABRELPE (2021) Panorama dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil 2021. Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Limpeza Pública e Resíduos Especiais, São Paulo
Alves SB, Souza ACS, Tipple AFV et al (2012) Manejo de resíduos gerados na assistência domiciliar pela Estratégia de Saúde da Familia. Rev Bras Enferm 65:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-71672012000100019
Cordeiro JFC, Silva MFI, de Oliveira AC, da Canini SRM (2019) Biological risk related to health care waste management in home care. Rev Rene 20:41852. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20192041852
Silva T, Maciel R, Florencio L, Machado Santos S (2022) Strategies for the improvement of home medical waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 72:222–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1982794
Siqueira ADO, Consoni ÂJ (2008) Resíduos sólidos de serviço de saúde - RSSS na assistência domiciliar (home-care): considerações para um manejo seguro. Rev Bras Ciências Ambient 09:9–14
CONDEPE/FIDEM (2019) Estabelecimentos de saúde, por tipo. http://www.bde.pe.gov.br/visualizacao/Visualizacao_formato2.aspx?codFormatacao=1405&CodInformacao=1011&Cod=3. Accessed 21 May 2021
IBGE (2020) Portal cidades Caruaru. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pe/caruaru/panorama. Accessed 25 Apr 2020
BRASIL (2003) Lei n° 10.741, de 1° de outubro de 2003. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília
MS (2012) Caderno de atenção domiciliar. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília
Matee VE, Manyele SV (2016) Assessment of sharps waste management practices in a referral hospital. African J Environ Sci Technol 10:86–95. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajest2015.1939
Hangulu L, Akintola O (2017) Health care waste management in community-based care: experiences of community health workers in low resource communities in South Africa. BMC Public Health 17:290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4378-5
Sonmez MO, Nazik F, Andi S (2018) Home medical care waste collection by caregivers in Turkey. Med Sci Int Med J 7:733. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8872
Ikeda Y (2012) Current status of waste management at home-visit nursing stations and during home visits in Japan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 14:202–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0058-9
Lakbala P, Lakbala M (2013) Knowledge, attitude and practice of hospital staff management Parvin. Waste Manag Res 31:729–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13484190
Odonkor ST, Mahami T (2020) Healthcare waste management in Ghanaian hospitals: associated public health and environmental challenges. Waste Manag Res 38:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20914748
Marziale MHP, dos Santos HEC, Trovó MEM (2015) Individual and occupational consequences of exposure to biological material among nursing workers Maria. Rev Enferm UERJ 23:449–454. https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2015.9481
Ikeda Y (2014) Importance of patient education on home medical care waste disposal in Japan. Waste Manag 34:1330–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.017
Stokes SM, Kim RY, Jacobs A et al (2020) Home disposal kits for leftover opioid medications after surgery: do they work? J Surg Res 245:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.034
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Health Secretariat of Caruaru, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (FACEPE) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, T., Silva, M.M., Florencio, L. et al. A qualitative descriptive case study on home medical waste management in Brazil. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 2068–2077 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01462-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01462-1