Abstract
Can we anticipate the emergence of the next pandemic antibiotic-resistant bacterial clone? Addressing such an ambitious question relies on our ability to comprehensively understand the ecological and epidemiological factors fostering the evolution of high-risk clones. Among these factors, the ability to persistently colonize and thrive in the human gut is crucial for most high-risk clones. Nonetheless, the causes and mechanisms facilitating successful gut colonization remain obscure. Here, we review recent evidence that suggests that bacterial metabolism plays a pivotal role in determining the ability of high-risk clones to colonize the human gut. Subsequently, we outline novel approaches that enable the exploration of microbial metabolism at an unprecedented scale and level of detail. A thorough understanding of the constraints and opportunities of bacterial metabolism in gut colonization will foster our ability to predict the emergence of high-risk clones and take appropriate containment strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Antimicrobial resistance
Antimicrobial resistance (AR) poses a grave threat to modern medicine and jeopardizes the effectiveness of global public health responses to infectious diseases (O’Neill 2016; World Health Organization 2017; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) 2019; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019; Murray et al. 2022). The overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to a significant increase in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. As a result, many people now die each year from infections that were previously treatable (O’Neill 2016; Murray et al. 2022). Current estimations predict that AR is responsible for 700,000 deaths annually and that, by 2050, AR infections could become the leading cause of death worldwide, causing up to 10 million deaths per year (O’Neill 2016; Murray et al. 2022). The magnitude of the AR crisis has been recognized by health authorities, such as the European and American Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC, CDC) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) 2019; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019). In addition, the quadripartite World Health Organization (WHO)-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)-World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)-United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) recognizes that critical efforts are required to reverse current dynamics and regain control over antibiotic-resistant bacteria (United Nations Environment Programme 2023; World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), UN Environment Programme (UNEP) 2022).
Arguably, one of the main drivers of this significant health problem is the emergence and global dissemination of epidemiologically successful drug-resistant clones. These high-risk clones have acquired adaptive traits that increase their pathogenicity and survival, including the acquisition of AR. Due to their unique combination of virulence, metabolic, and AR genes, these clones pose a significant risk to human health, spreading uncontrollably in the community and hospital settings and different One Health sectors. Additionally, they contribute to the global spread of AR by transmitting genetic platforms such as transposons or plasmids to unrelated bacteria via horizontal gene transfer (Woodford et al. 2011).
Among these high-risk clones, multidrug-resistant pathogenic Escherichia coli has been categorized as an “urgent threat” by the CDC and a “critical priority” by the WHO. E. coli is a Gram-negative commensal in the human gastrointestinal tract and, simultaneously, one of the most frequent pathogens. Indeed, E. coli is the most common cause of extra-intestinal infections, such as urinary tract infections and bloodstream infections (Pitout 2012). Extra-intestinal E. coli (ExPEC) high-risk clones mainly belong to the phylogenetic group B2 and, to a lesser extent, phylogenetic group D (Le Gall et al. 2007; Massot et al. 2016; Nowrouzian et al. 2019). B2 isolates exhibit considerable genome diversity, with 10 subgroups from B2-I to B2-X, and are overrepresented by specific sequence-type complexes that show a higher ability to persist and colonize the human gut (Mansouri et al. 2022). For instance, E. coli belonging to the sequence-type complex ST131 accounts for up to 30% of all infections caused by ExPEC globally and is responsible for 60–90% of the fluoroquinolone-resistant and 40–80% of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing ExPEC infections (Nicolas-Chanoine et al. 2007). Recently, new clinically relevant clonal complexes have been identified. For example, ST410 emerged as a significant global concern, becoming increasingly common in Chinese hospitals since 2017 (Ba et al. 2024).
The ability of these worrisome clonal complexes (and those of other species) to colonize the human gut is key to their ecological and epidemiological success. Therefore, understanding how they colonize and thrive within the intricate environment of the gastrointestinal tract is crucial to predict, anticipate, and mitigate their dissemination. In the following sections, we will outline the factors that facilitate bacterial colonization of the human gut and discuss experimental approaches to identify these factors.
Ecological interactions driving a successful gut colonization
The gut microbiota is the largest bacterial population cohabiting with humans. It functions as a dynamic biological factory that evolves and adapts with the host, significantly affecting health and influencing various diseases (Minagar et al. 2023). The beneficial impact of gut microbiota on human metabolic health is extensively documented in the literature (Fan and Pedersen 2021; Liu et al. 2022). For example, the microbiota plays a crucial role in the digestion and absorption of dietary lipids, proteins, and peptides (Fan et al. 2015; Martinez-Guryn et al. 2018). However, the mechanisms employed by high-risk clones to invade and colonize the healthy microbiota remain poorly understood.
While many microbial species are regularly consumed through food ingestion, only a small proportion will successfully establish a long-lasting population in the gut (Powell et al. 2016). Successful colonization depends on several factors, including the complex ecological interactions between the resident gut microbiota and the potential colonizer bacteria (Schluter and Foster 2012; Coyte and Rakoff-Nahoum 2019). These interactions can be dynamic, ranging from resource competition to cooperative partnerships. For example, high-risk clones actively secrete toxic products such as bacteriocins, colicins, or microcins that inhibit the growth of the resident microbiota, illustrating the fierce competition that takes place within the gut microbiota (Micenková et al. 2016) (Fig. 1A). Other pathogenic bacteria outcompete gut commensals by using carbon sources that are unavailable to them. For instance, Salmonella enterica metabolizes propionate, ethanolamine, and ascorbate. These carbon sources are typically inaccessible to commensal bacteria, allowing S. enterica to colonize the gut (Asten and Dijk 2005; Harvey et al. 2011). Similarly, multidrug-resistant E. coli strains able to use a broad range of carbohydrates displace commensal E. coli from the gut, highlighting the importance of resource competition in colonization (Connor et al. 2023). In other cases, potential colonizers do not compete but can benefit from the existing microbiota. For instance, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium uses lactate produced by fermentative bacteria as a carbon source. In this way, S. Typhimurium engages in a commensalism relationship with resident bacteria, where fermenters provide a valuable resource for S. Typhimurium colonization (Taylor and Winter 2020) (Fig. 1B).
Beyond interbacterial ecological relationships, gut bacteria engage in a dynamic interplay with the host. Successful colonization often depends on adhering to the intestinal epithelium. This attachment can be facilitated by bacterial specialized surface structures, such as the O-antigen or E. coli’s type 1 fimbria, which increases interaction with the mannosylated receptors on the epithelial mucosa (Fig. 1C) (Krogfelt et al. 1990; Hölzer et al. 2009; Powell et al. 2016). Other factors, such as flagella expression, also aid in successful colonization since bacteria require flagellar mobility to cross the mucus layer and reach the surface of the epithelium (Sevrin et al. 2020).
Gut colonization also requires evading or tolerating host immune defenses. Some bacteria, like Helicobacter pylori, can evade host immune responses by modifying their surface antigens (e.g, lipopolysaccharide and flagellin) or by secreting immunomodulatory factors, such as nitric oxide (Fig. 1D, Lina 2014). Besides, bacteria expressing higher levels of serum survival protein (iss), a well-recognized virulence factor in ExPEC isolates, can avoid the host’s immune system. iss gene is necessary for capsule synthesis and facilitates avoiding phagocyte recognition (Sarowska et al. 2019; Biran et al. 2021).
Metabolism and colonization
Beyond the ecological factors outlined above, bacterial metabolism plays a central role in gut colonization (Nogales and Garmendia 2022). Indeed, adapting and thriving in a chemically complex environment such as the gut microbiota requires a set of fine-tuned metabolic traits that translate into high bacterial fitness (i.e., competitive ability) (Bernhardt et al. 2020).
However, the high microbial diversity of the gut microbiome, encompassing a vast array of species, presents a significant challenge to understanding its metabolic complexity. From obligate aerobes to strict anaerobes, commensal bacteria exhibit a wide range of metabolic profiles. Further complicating this scenario, some species exhibit exceptional metabolic plasticity, adapting their metabolism to changing environments. For instance, Bacillus fragilis, a strictly anaerobic bacterium, can metabolize certain carbohydrates in the presence of nanomolar oxygen concentrations (such as those found in the colon’s crypts) thanks to the expression of the commensal colonization factor (ccf) genes. These genes allow B. fragillis to use some polysaccharides otherwise undigestible in microaerobiosis. Crucially, strains lacking ccf genes fail to colonize the gut effectively (Lee et al. 2013), exemplifying a case in which metabolic plasticity is key to colonization.
The commensal microbiota can actively prevent gut colonization of harmful bacteria thanks to its own metabolic processes. For instance, certain strains can limit the establishment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in the gut of mice treated with antibiotics. These protective strains reduce the available fructose levels in the gut, a sugar that fuels VRE growth in vivo (Djukovic et al. 2022; Isaac et al. 2022). Similarly, the commensal Clostridium scindens produces secondary bile acids that directly inhibit the growth and colonization of Clostridioides difficile (Buffie et al. 2015). Moreover, experimental evidence supports the notion that commensal bacteria use a certain degree of metabolic flexibility to outcompete phylogenetically close pathogens. For example, when E. coli Nissle 1917 (a probiotic non-pathogenic strain) colonizes the mice gut, and no other E. coli strains are present in the community, it uses ribose as a carbon source. However, when competing with other E. coli strains, E. coli Nissle alters its nutrient preferences and avoids consuming ribose, highlighting that the presence of other microorganisms (and their metabolisms) critically affects the colonization capacity of E. coli.
Central metabolic pathways are usually highly conserved, comprising a significant part of the core genome (Vieira et al. 2011). Several examples highlight the crucial role that central metabolism plays in the gut colonization of species like E. coli, the most frequent pathogen causing extraintestinal infections. For instance, E. coli mutants lacking phosphoglucose isomerase, a key glycolytic enzyme encoded by the pgi gene, display a substantial colonization defect when competing against their respective wild-type strain (Chang et al. 2004). Similarly, mutants lacking the Entner-Doudoroff pathway are defective in colonization due to their inability to effectively metabolize gluconate, the most abundant carbon source in the intestine (Sweeney et al. 1996). Interestingly, the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway is dispensable for E. coli colonization in mouse models. This suggests that E. coli may obtain the reducing power essential for sugar catabolism (i.e., nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)) using an alternative, unknown mechanism (Chang et al. 2004).
Altogether, this evidence suggests that efficient bacterial colonization of the gut is likely determined by (i) the availability of nutrients that bacteria can use (metabolic range), (ii) the ability to use these available carbon sources more efficiently than the rest of the members in the community (metabolic efficiency), and (iii) the ability to adapt their metabolism to the rest of the community members (metabolic flexibility). Therefore, measuring, understanding, and predicting bacterial metabolism in the gut is crucial to anticipate the evolutionary, ecological, and epidemiological success of high-risk antibiotic-resistant bacterial clones.
Novel approaches to understanding the role of bacterial metabolism in colonization success
The systematic and complete understanding of how bacteria use nutrients within natural microbial communities is complicated by the cost, technical difficulty, and sensitivity of metabolomic studies to external perturbations (Johnson and Gonzalez 2012). Several new approaches have recently facilitated the study of microbial metabolism at an unprecedented scale. The following sections will delve into these new methods and discuss their potential to provide critical insights to combat and anticipate the emergence of the next pandemic high-risk clone.
In silico predictive approaches: modeling metabolism
The advent of sequencing technologies and a large amount of genomic high-throughput data have contributed to a profound understanding of microbial behavior at a systemic level (Bordbar et al. 2014). Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are structured representations of the metabolic capabilities of a target organism based on existing biochemical, genetic, and phenotypic knowledge that can be used to predict phenotype from genotype (Nielsen 2017). In other words, GEMs map all the biochemical reactions that occur within a cell and can predict the growth of an organism in a given environment (Fig. 2A). GEMs are key biotechnology tools that are increasingly used to analyze and predict bacterial metabolism under different environmental and clinical conditions (Monk et al. 2014; O’Brien et al. 2015). For instance, GEMs of more than 100 E. coli strains suggested that the phylogroup B2 share a unique set of metabolic features: thanks to the presence of specific aldolases, B2 strains are more efficient than other E. coli phylogroups at metabolizing sugars derived from the mucus glycan. This confers a colonization advantage that might explain their outstanding gut colonization ability and epidemiological success (Fang et al. 2018).
The predictive power of individual strain GEMs is limited because bacterial strains do not live in isolation. Instead, they live in diverse communities where the extent of metabolic interactions has traditionally been difficult to understand (Ankrah et al. 2021). In this regard, the transition from single-taxon to community-scale metabolic models fostered by computational and mathematical advances has represented a paradigm shift in recent years (Harcombe et al. 2014; Zomorrodi and Segrè 2017; Dukovski et al. 2021; Woo et al. 2024). Community-scale models allow the understanding of complex microbial communities and their interspecies interactions, such as mutualism or competition (Lewis et al. 2012; Heinken et al. 2013; Ang et al. 2018; Dukovski et al. 2021; Schäfer et al. 2023; Ghiotto et al. 2024). Crucially, recent work has linked the composition of bacterial communities with its function, enabling the accurate prediction of biological function at the genetic, organismal, and ecological scales (Diaz-Colunga et al. 2023). This advance paves the way for a better understanding of gut microbiota ecological interactions and potentially engineering bacterial communities as therapeutic alternatives. In summary, (community-scale) GEMs are potent tools for elucidating the metabolism of single and complex systems and represent a great platform to study the metabolic capability associated with gut colonization of high-risk clones within the intricate environment of the gut microbiome (Heinken et al. 2023).
In vitro arrayed perturbation experiments
Modeling helps to understand and predict the role of metabolic traits on gut colonization, yet experimental validation is crucial to confirm these predictions (Fig. 2B). Validating computational metabolic predictions may seem challenging, considering that GEMs generate extensive amounts of data. However, recent approaches offer accessible solutions. One such strategy involves the construction of genome-wide single-gene knockout mutant libraries, such as the KEIO collection for E. coli (Baba et al. 2006). This collection contains strains with mutations in each individual gene, allowing researchers to systematically assess the impact of each gene on a specific function. The use of the KEIO collection allowed the identification of 45 E. coli genes key for the inhibition of P. aeruginosa gut colonization in a nutrient-dependent manner (Christofi et al. 2019). This study highlights the power of genome-wide mutant libraries to uncover the ecological and evolutionary aspects that rule colonization.
However, genome-wide mutant libraries are only available for model bacteria and, therefore, are unsuitable for non-model species in the microbiota. Molecular biology has made significant progress in the dynamical engineering of cellular metabolism, especially with the development of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology (Wang et al. 2016). Recent advances focus on using a catalytically dead version of Cas9 (dCas9) that cannot cleave DNA but retains a strong DNA binding activity. The binding of dCas9 to promoters and open reading frames efficiently prevents the expression of targeted genes by blocking transcription. Hence, dCas9, combined with a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the chosen gene, can bind and repress targeted genes strongly and specifically (Bikard et al. 2013; Call and Andrews 2022). This system is called CRISPRi (for CRISPR interference) and has been validated under several experimental conditions and bacterial species (Bikard et al. 2013; Rousset and Bikard 2020; Call and Andrews 2022). By generating large sgRNA libraries redundantly targeting the whole genome of target bacteria, CRISPRi can be used to interrogate bacterial phenotypes in a high-throughput manner (Rousset and Bikard 2020), allowing the study of complex bacterial traits, such as colonization capacity, at an unprecedented resolution. This technology enables the decryption of metabolic interactions by genetically engineering non-model bacterial species. For example, CRISPRi was used in the non-model probiotic strain Eubacterium limosum to study the role in gut colonization of several genes in the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and the fructose-phosphotransferase system, paving the way for future metabolic studies in a non-traditionally studied bacteria (Shin et al. 2019; Call and Andrews 2022).
Transposon insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) offers another useful approach to uncovering complex metabolic interactions. This technique combines high-throughput DNA sequencing with transposon genome-wide mutagenesis. When a transposon is inserted in a gene, its function will be disrupted, hence revealing critical aspects of gene functionalities (Van Opijnen et al. 2009). Tn-seq requires generating a transposon library containing mutants with insertions in every non-essential gene. After growth in a given environment, the abundance of each specific insertion is retrieved by deep sequencing. Comparing each mutant’s abundance before and after growth provides quantitative information correlating phenotype with genotype (Van Opijnen et al. 2009; Burby et al. 2017). For instance, the analysis of nearly all Vibrio cholerae genes through Tn-seq revealed that bacteria lacking vgrG3 gene, displayed a reduced colonization capacity. VgrG3 is part of the Type 6 secretion system (T6SS), a major virulence mechanism in Gram-negatives, and therefore, a deficiency in this secretion system will result in a compromised ability to compete with commensal bacteria (Fu et al. 2013).
In summary, high-throughput genomic disruption and interaction experiments hold great potential to decode host-microbiome associations, improve functional profiling of microbial genomes, and tackle complex biological pathways that underlie the colonization success of bacterial pathogens.
In vivo and simulated environments
While the above-mentioned in silico and in vitro techniques provide a huge amount of information, they offer a limited view of gut colonization due to their static and simplified nature. In silico and in vitro techniques cannot fully replicate the dynamic interplay between the gut’s changing environment (pH, temperature, bile salts, etc.) and the complex biochemical processes and microbiota interactions within the human gastrointestinal tract (Morelli 2000).
Complex environments that mimic natural conditions should be employed to further validate insights identified through in silico and in vitro assays (Fig. 2C). Mice are arguably the most common animal model to study host-pathogen interactions (Wilk and Schughart 2012; Smith et al. 2022); however, ethical and cost-related issues preclude their use in many laboratories. Alternative model systems are progressively gaining importance. For instance, Galleria mellonella has been increasingly used as a model to study bacterial infection (Ménard et al. 2021), particularly by multi-resistant bacteria (Krezdorn et al. 2014). This invertebrate presents an immune system similar to mammals, and the research findings in G. mellonella often correlate with mammal results. In addition, the handling of the specimens is more straightforward than that of other invertebrate models. Vertebrate alternatives, such as Zebrafish (Danio rerio), also serve as models for studying host-microbiome interactions (Yang et al. 2022; Kaszab et al. 2023). Nevertheless, even the animal models listed above may not accurately capture some aspects of the complex interactions of the human gut.
Motivated by the complex, costly, and ethically regulated process associated with animal models (Dupont et al. 2019), novel approaches simulating intricate gut microbiota environments have emerged as promising alternatives. For example, human-associated gut microbiota microcosms are scalable and easy to manipulate in the laboratory while offering an ex vivo model of the human gut microbiota that partially preserves its natural diversity. In this model, anaerobic microcosms are filled with a fresh human fecal slurry that includes the resident microbial community. Human gut microbiota microcosms have been used to study colonization by high-risk clones (Benz et al. 2021) and horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (Baumgartner et al. 2020).
A more realistic yet complex model system is the gastrointestinal simulator. This in vitro platform dynamically mimics the human digestive processes (Dupont et al. 2019). Gastrointestinal simulators typically consist of a series of compartments that mimic the physiological conditions found in different gastrointestinal tract regions, such as the stomach, small intestine, and colon. Gastrointestinal simulators allow to experimentally dissect how digestion and nutrient availability along the gut influence human health and disease by simulating the complex interactions between food components, gut microbiota, and host cells. The efficacy of this approach has been demonstrated in studies investigating the potential survival and activity of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract (Thuenemann 2015; Lambrecht et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020). The use of gastrointestinal simulators provides a valuable and robust platform to inform in vivo experiments, reducing costs and animal use and aligning with recent European Directives promoting non-animal approaches for research (European Commission 2024). Remarkably, using human fecal samples to seed the simulator may help to study the metabolic ability and colonization capacity of high-risk clones in a real-life complex environment.
Conclusions
While the gut microbiota composition varies significantly between individuals, recent findings suggest a functional convergence that transcends specific bacterial species (Diaz-Colunga et al. 2023). This implies that the metabolic capabilities of the gut microbiota, rather than its exact composition, play a critical role in enabling successful colonization by high-risk clones. Consequently, the future of gut microbiome research is moving beyond a species-centric view towards a functional understanding of the metabolic landscape. This shift will not only enhance our ability to combat antibiotic resistance but will also pave the way for developing novel therapeutic interventions and personalized medicine approaches based on an individual’s unique gut metabolic profile. In this regard, novel techniques like GEMs, CRISPRi, and Tn-Seq, combined with new in vitro and in vivo models that mimic gut conditions, will help to dissect the intricate metabolic interplay within the gut microbiome. Identifying the metabolic strengths and weaknesses of high-risk clones will be crucial to establishing targeted strategies to disrupt their colonization ability and predict the emergence of antibiotic-resistant threats.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Ang KS, Lakshmanan M, Lee N-R, Lee D-Y (2018) Metabolic modeling of microbial community interactions for health, environmental and biotechnological applications. Curr Genomics 19:712–722. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202919666180911144055
Ankrah NYD, Bernstein DB, Biggs M et al (2021) Enhancing microbiome research through genome-scale metabolic modeling. mSystems 6:e00599-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00599-21
Asten AJAM, Dijk JE (2005) Distribution of “classic” virulence factors among Salmonella spp. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 44:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsim.2005.02.002
Ba X, Guo Y, Moran RA et al (2024) Global emergence of a hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli ST410 clone. Nat Commun 15:494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43854-3
Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M et al (2006) Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006.0008. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100050
Baumgartner M, Bayer F, Pfrunder-Cardozo KR et al (2020) Resident microbial communities inhibit growth and antibiotic-resistance evolution of Escherichia coli in human gut microbiome samples. PLOS Biol 18:e3000465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000465
Benz F, Huisman JS, Bakkeren E et al (2021) Plasmid- and strain-specific factors drive variation in ESBL-plasmid spread in vitro and in vivo. ISME J 15:862–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00819-4
Bernhardt JR, Kratina P, Pereira AL et al (2020) The evolution of competitive ability for essential resources. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0247
Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P et al (2013) Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7429–7437. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt520
Biran D, Sura T, Otto A et al (2021) Surviving Serum: the Escherichia coli iss Gene of Extraintestinal Pathogenic E. coli Is Required for the Synthesis of Group 4 Capsule. Infect Immun 89. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00316-21
Bordbar A, Monk JM, King ZA, Palsson BO (2014) Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions. Nat Rev Genet 15:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3643
Buffie CG, Bucci V, Stein RR et al (2015) Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13828
Burby PE, Nye TM, Schroeder JW, Simmons LA (2017) Implementation and Data Analysis of Tn-seq, whole-genome resequencing, and single-molecule real-time sequencing for bacterial genetics. J Bacteriol 199. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00560-16
Call SN, Andrews LB (2022) CRISPR-based approaches for gene regulation in non-model bacteria. Front Genome Ed 4:892304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.892304
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) (2019) Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Chang D-E, Smalley DJ, Tucker DL et al (2004) Carbon nutrition of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:7427–7432. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307888101
Christofi T, Panayidou S, Dieronitou I et al (2019) Metabolic output defines Escherichia coli as a health-promoting microbe against intestinal Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 9:14463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51058-3
Connor CH, Zucoloto AZ, Munnoch JT et al (2023) Multidrug-resistant E. coli encoding high genetic diversity in carbohydrate metabolism genes displace commensal E. coli from the intestinal tract. PLOS Biol 21:e3002329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002329
Coyte KZ, Rakoff-Nahoum S (2019) Understanding competition and cooperation within the mammalian gut microbiome. Curr Biol 29:R538–R544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.017
Diaz-Colunga J, Skwara A, Vila JCC et al (2023) Global epistasis and the emergence of ecological function. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.496987
Djukovic A, Garzón MJ, Canlet C et al (2022) Lactobacillus supports Clostridiales to restrict gut colonization by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Nat Commun 13:5617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33313-w
Dukovski I, Bajić D, Chacón JM et al (2021) A metabolic modeling platform for the computation of microbial ecosystems in time and space (COMETS). Nat Protoc 16:5030–5082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00593-3
Dupont D, Alric M, Blanquet-Diot S et al (2019) Can dynamic in vitro digestion systems mimic the physiological reality? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59:1546–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1421900
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2019) Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe: annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS Net) 2018. Publications Office, LU
European Commission (2024) Animals in science. Directive 2010/63/EU. Regulation (EU)2019/1010. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/animals-science_en. Accessed 16 Apr 2024
Fan P, Li L, Rezaei A et al (2015) Metabolites of dietary protein and peptides by intestinal microbes and their impacts on gut. Curr Protein Pept Sci 16:646–654. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203716666150630133657
Fan Y, Pedersen O (2021) Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9
Fang X, Monk JM, Mih N et al (2018) Escherichia coli B2 strains prevalent in inflammatory bowel disease patients have distinct metabolic capabilities that enable colonization of intestinal mucosa. BMC Syst Biol 12:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-018-0587-5
Fu Y, Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ (2013) Tn-Seq analysis of vibrio cholerae intestinal colonization reveals a role for T6SS-mediated antibacterial activity in the host. Cell Host Microbe 14:652–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.001
Ghiotto G, Detman-Ignatowska A, Chojnacka A et al (2024) Decipher syntrophies within C2-C4 organic acids-degrading anaerobic microbiomes: a multi-omic exploration. Chem Eng J 151390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.151390
Harcombe WR, Riehl WJ, Dukovski I et al (2014) Metabolic resource allocation in individual microbes determines ecosystem interactions and spatial dynamics. Cell Rep 7:1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.070
Harvey PC, Watson M, Hulme S et al (2011) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colonizing the lumen of the chicken intestine grows slowly and upregulates a unique set of virulence and metabolism genes. Infect Immun 79:4105–4121. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01390-10
Heinken A, Hertel J, Acharya G et al (2023) Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of 7,302 human microorganisms for personalized medicine. Nat Biotechnol 41:1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01628-0
Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming RMT, Thiele I (2013) Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut Microbes 4:28–40. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.22370
Hölzer SU, Schlumberger MC, Jäckel D, Hensel M (2009) Effect of the O-antigen length of lipopolysaccharide on the functions of type III secretion systems in Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun 77:5458–5470. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00871-09
Isaac S, Flor-Duro A, Carruana G et al (2022) Microbiome-mediated fructose depletion restricts murine gut colonization by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Nat Commun 13:7718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35380-5
Johnson CH, Gonzalez FJ (2012) Challenges and opportunities of metabolomics. J Cell Physiol 227:2975–2981. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24002
Kaszab E, Jiang D, Szabó I et al (2023) Evaluating the in vivo virulence of environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa using microinjection model of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Antibiotics 12:1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12121740
Krezdorn J, Adams S, Coote PJ (2014) A Galleria mellonella infection model reveals double and triple antibiotic combination therapies with enhanced efficacy versus a multidrug-resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 63:945–955. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.074245-0
Krogfelt KA, Bergmans H, Klemm P (1990) Direct evidence that the FimH protein is the mannose-specific adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae. Infect Immun 58:1995–1998. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.58.6.1995-1998.1990
Lambrecht E, Van Coillie E, Van Meervenne E et al (2019) Commensal E. coli rapidly transfer antibiotic resistance genes to human intestinal microbiota in the Mucosal Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (M-SHIME). Int J Food Microbiol 311:108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108357
Le Gall T, Clermont O, Gouriou S et al (2007) Extraintestinal virulence is a coincidental by-product of commensalism in B2 phylogenetic group Escherichia coli strains. Mol Biol Evol 24:2373–2384. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm172
Lee SM, Donaldson GP, Mikulski Z et al (2013) Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature 501:426–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12447
Lewis NE, Nagarajan H, Palsson BO (2012) Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2737
Lina TT (2014) Immune evasion strategies used by Helicobacter pylori. World J Gastroenterol 20:12753. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.12753
Liu J, Tan Y, Cheng H et al (2022) Functions of gut microbiota metabolites, current status and future perspectives. Aging Dis 13:1106. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2022.0104
Liu L, Wang Q, Wu X et al (2020) Vancomycin exposure caused opportunistic pathogens bloom in intestinal microbiome by simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME). Environ Pollut 265:114399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114399
Mansouri M, Najar Peerayeh S, Mohabati Mobarez A et al (2022) Phylogenetic groups/B2 subgroup distributions, serogrouping and identification of virulence factors in extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli strains isolated from the stool of healthy children under 10 years old. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis 10. https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect-118889
Martinez-Guryn K, Hubert N, Frazier K et al (2018) Small intestine microbiota regulate host digestive and absorptive adaptive responses to dietary lipids. Cell Host Microbe 23:458–469.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.03.011
Massot M, Daubié A-S, Clermont O et al (2016) Phylogenetic, virulence and antibiotic resistance characteristics of commensal strain populations of Escherichia coli from community subjects in the Paris area in 2010 and evolution over 30 years. Microbiology 162:642–650. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000242
Ménard G, Rouillon A, Cattoir V, Donnio P-Y (2021) Galleria mellonella as a suitable model of bacterial infection: past, present and future. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:782733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.782733
Micenková L, Bosák J, Štaudová B et al (2016) Microcin determinants are associated with B2 phylogroup of human fecal Escherichia coli isolates. MicrobiologyOpen 5:490–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.345
Minagar A, Jabbour R, Jabbour H (2023) The human gut microbiota: a dynamic biologic factory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Monk J, Nogales J, Palsson BO (2014) Optimizing genome-scale network reconstructions. Nat Biotechnol 32:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2870
Morelli L (2000) In vitro selection of probiotic lactobacilli: a critical Appraisal. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol:59–57
Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F et al (2022) Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 399:629–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
Nicolas-Chanoine M-H, Blanco J, Leflon-Guibout V et al (2007) Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm464
Nielsen J (2017) Systems biology of metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 86:245–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044757
Nogales J, Garmendia J (2022) Bacterial metabolism and pathogenesis intimate intertwining: time for metabolic modelling to come into action. Microb Biotechnol 15:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13942
Nowrouzian FL, Clermont O, Edin M et al (2019) Escherichia coli B2 phylogenetic subgroups in the infant gut microbiota: predominance of uropathogenic lineages in Swedish infants and enteropathogenic lineages in Pakistani infants. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01681–e01619. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01681-19
O’Brien EJ, Monk JM, Palsson BO (2015) Using genome-scale models to predict biological capabilities. Cell 161:971–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.019
O’Neill J (2016) Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Government of the United Kingdom
Pitout JDD (2012) Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: a combination of virulence with antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00009
Powell JE, Leonard SP, Kwong WK et al (2016) Genome-wide screen identifies host colonization determinants in a bacterial gut symbiont. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:13887–13892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610856113
Rousset F, Bikard D (2020) CRISPR screens in the era of microbiomes. Curr Opin Microbiol 57:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2020.07.009
Sarowska J, Futoma-Koloch B, Jama-Kmiecik A et al (2019) Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0
Schäfer M, Pacheco AR, Künzler R et al (2023) Metabolic interaction models recapitulate leaf microbiota ecology. Science 381:eadf5121. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf5121
Schluter J, Foster KR (2012) The evolution of mutualism in gut microbiota via host epithelial selection. PLOS Biol 10:e1001424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001424
Sevrin G, Massier S, Chassaing B et al (2020) Adaptation of adherent-invasive E. coli to gut environment: impact on flagellum expression and bacterial colonization ability. Gut Microbes 11:364–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1421886
Shin J, Kang S, Song Y et al (2019) Genome engineering of Eubacterium limosum using expanded genetic tools and the CRISPR-Cas9 system. ACS Synth Biol 8:2059–2068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00150
Smith CM, Baker RE, Proulx MK, et al (2022) Host-pathogen genetic interactions underlie tuberculosis susceptibility in genetically diverse mice. eLife 11:e74419. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74419
Sweeney NJ, Laux DC, Cohen PS (1996) Escherichia coli F-18 and E. coli K-12 eda mutants do not colonize the streptomycin-treated mouse large intestine. Infect Immun 64:3504–3511. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.64.9.3504-3511.1996
Taylor SJ, Winter SE (2020) Salmonella finds a way: metabolic versatility of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in diverse host environments. PLOS Pathog 16:e1008540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008540
Thuenemann EC (2015) Dynamic digestion models: general introduction. In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I et al (eds) The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health: in vitro and ex vivo models. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 33–36
United Nations Environment Programme (2023) Bracing for superbugs: strengthening environmental action in the One Health response to antimicrobial resistance. United Nations
Van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A (2009) Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1377
Vieira G, Sabarly V, Bourguignon P-Y et al (2011) Core and Panmetabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 193:1461–1472. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01192-10
Wang H, La Russa M, Qi LS (2016) CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu Rev Biochem 85:227–264. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014607
Wilk E, Schughart K (2012) The mouse as model system to study host-pathogen interactions in influenza A infections. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol 2:177–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470942390.mo110173
Woo H, Kim Y, Kim D, Yoon SH (2024) Machine learning identifies key metabolic reactions in bacterial growth on different carbon sources. Mol Syst Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-024-00017-w
Woodford N, Turton JF, Livermore DM (2011) Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: the role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:736–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00268.x
World Health Organization (2017) Antibacterial agents in clinical development. World Health Organization
World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), UN Environment Programme (UNEP) (2022) Global plan of action on one health. Towards a more comprehensive one health, approach to global health threats at the human-animal-environment interface. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2289en
Yang M, Fu H, Wang W-X (2022) Responses of zebrafish (Danio rerio) cells to antibiotic erythromycin stress at the subcellular levels. Sci Total Environ 853:158727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158727
Zomorrodi AR, Segrè D (2017) Genome-driven evolutionary game theory helps understand the rise of metabolic interdependencies in microbial communities. Nat Commun 8:1563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01407-5
Funding
Work in the Evodynamics lab (https://evodynamicslab.com/) is supported by project no. PI21/01363, funded by the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Union; CIBER -Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red- (CIBERINFEC) CB21/13/00084; Convocatoria SEIMC-FUNDACIÓN SORIA MELGUIZO de Investigación 2021. Cristina Herencias is supported by a Sara Borrell contract from the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) (grant no. CD21/00115), the Convocatoria Intramural Emergentes 2021 FIBioHRC-IRYCIS. Cod. IPM-21 n° C13, and PI23/01945 and MV23/00102 projects funded by Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII). Jerónimo Rodríguez Beltrán acknowledges support by a Miguel Servet contract from the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) (grant no. CP20/00154), co-founded by the European Social Fund, “Investing in your future”. Laura Álvaro Llorente is granted by the Comunidad de Madrid through the Consejería de Educación, Universidades, Ciencia y Portavocía (grant no. PEJ-2021-AI/BMD-23127).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.R.B and C.H. acquired funds, conceived the idea, and supervised the project. All authors wrote, edited, and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Muñoz-Cazalla, A., de Quinto, I., Álvaro-Llorente, L. et al. The role of bacterial metabolism in human gut colonization. Int Microbiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-024-00550-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-024-00550-6