Abstract
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common disease with ulcers in oral cavity which may trigger chewing, speaking, and swallowing difficulties to patients. Treatment of RAS is primarily aimed at pain relief and the promotion of wound healing. However, few agents have been found to have definite effect in the management of RAS and most of the medicinal products may cause adverse reactions or other disadvantages, which makes their clinical usage questionable. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to assess the clinical effect of diode laser and traditional medication treatment on RAS. In this study, 56 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 28). Laser group was treated using diode laser (810 nm, 1.0 W, CW, irradiation time 20 s for 3 applications) once daily for continuous 3 days. Medication group was treated with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% three times a day until the lesion was healed. Spontaneous and functional pain level on the third day of treatment was significantly less in the laser group. Significant difference was observed with respect to healing time; however, the order of difference is small albeit of statistical significance. Diode laser with the chosen parameters had better effects on pain relief and no distinct advantage on wound healing comparing with medication. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000030298; date of registration: 26 February 2020 (retrospectively registered)
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common and frequently encountered disease which develops recurrently, with painful ulcers confined in oral cavity only as clinical manifestation [1]. The ulcers are typically clearly defined, sunken in the central part, round or elliptical in shape, circumscribed by erythematous haloes, and covered by pseudomembrane tissues with grey or yellow in color [2]. RAS is generally identified as three different types respectively named Minor (MiRAS), Major (MaRAS), and Herpetiform (HU) ulcers according to the distinct discrepancy primarily in morphology and prognosis of ulcers [3]. Thereinto, minor aphthous is the most prevalent form which accounts about 70–85% of all RAS lesions [4]. The definite etiology and pathophysiology of RAS remain unclear up to date. However, it is considered to be a kind of multifactorial disease. Predisposing factors like immune system dysfunction, genetic predisposition, endocrine alterations, nutrition deficiencies, microbiological organisms, specific drugs, food allergens, stress or anxiety, and mechanical injuries may contribute to the occurrence of mucosal lesions of RAS [5].
RAS is a self-limited disease and a typical minor aphthous ulcer can spontaneously heal within 4–14 days [4]. However, the lesions in oral cavity may trigger severe chewing, speaking, and swallowing difficulties, which seriously interfere with the normal activities of patients in daily life [6]. The objects of treatment are pain relief, promotion of reepithelialization, and reduction of the frequency [7]. Traditional medications for RAS applied locally or systemically including corticosteroids, anesthetics, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents, multivitamins and microelements, and immunomodulator drugs [1, 8, 9]. Topical therapy is the fundamental choice for minor ulcers, in comparison with systemic agents applied when the outbreaks are constant and aggressive, with major ulcers or when the patients respond insensitively to topical agents [10].
Although numerous agents available for RAS, only a few are identified though evidence-based processes. Topical corticosteroids perform potent effects on active ulcers and provide a widespread use for treatment of RAS [8]. However, long-term application of such kind of agents may lead to a risk of oral candidiasis [8]. Furthermore, most of the medicinal products may have adverse reactions or other disadvantages, which makes their clinical usage questionable [11]. Thus, medical and dental clinicians have been incessantly seeking for treatment modalities effectively managing symptoms of RAS without adverse effects.
Soon after the discovery of low level laser therapy (LLLT) by Ender Mester in the 1960s, it was rapidly realized that LLLT had the magic potential to treat numerous diseases and unhealthy conditions involving inflammation, pain, wound healing, regeneration, and abnormal immune responses [12, 13]. There has been a widespread application of LLLT in field of dental diseases including endodontics, periodontics, peri-implantitis, diseases of oral mucosa, oral surgeries, temporomandibular disorders, and dental movement [14]. Recently, several different types of laser (Nd:YAG laser, CO2 laser, and diode laser, etc.) have been applied for the treatment of RAS and they indeed demonstrated superiority in pain relief and faster healing comparing with placebo or medical treatment group [15,16,17]. However, additional high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are particularly needed to scope the optimal parameters for RAS laser treatment.
The purpose of this RCT was to assess the clinical effect of diode laser and traditional medication treatment on RAS.
Materials and methods
Study design
Ethical approval for the project was obtained from Medical Ethics Committee of Stomatology Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Study subjects were recruited from the pool of patients in the Clinic of Oral Medicine of Hospital of Stomatology, Heibei Medical University between January 2018 and December 2019.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) A minor aphthous ulcer with the size of not more than 10 mm in diameter; (2) The ulcer occurred within 3 days; (3) The visual analog scale (VAS) of functional pain score before treatment was not less than 3; (4) Only one lesion in mouth.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients with systemic disease relating with oral ulcer (such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, Behcet’s syndrome); (2) Pregnant or lactating patients; (3) Patients undergoing orthodontic therapy; (4) Patients accepted other treatments (such as systemic steroids or immunomodulatory agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) during the previous month; (5) Patients used any topical agents within 1 week before the trial; (6) Patients with the habits of tobacco and alcohol. Oral and written informed consents were obtained from all participants.
The sample size was determined with the method described by Walters for comparing means of ordinal data when the samples display a relatively normal distribution [18]. The significance level was chosen as 0.05, the power of this test as 0.80, the value of the minimal difference in intensity of pain between two treatment protocols as 3.53 [15], and the value of standard deviation of population as 3 (analyzed from preliminary experiment), then α = 0.05, β = 0.20, σ = 3. When applying a two-sided t test, the sample size was calculated and determined as 24, with 12 participants in each group. Finally, the sample size of the study was determined to be 56, with 28 in each group. After written and verbal informed consent was obtained, the patients were randomly assigned to either laser or medication group using a block of random numbers generated by an assistant by Excel 2007.
Study procedure
Laser group was treated using a calibrated laser source from a diode laser (810 nm, FOX laser, A.R.C., Germany) device with the following irradiation parameters: power output 1.0 W, continuous mode, fiber diameter 320 μm with irradiation performed in scanning mode on an area of 1.5 cm of diameter around the lesion, irradiation time 20 s for 3 applications with 10-s interval, total theoretical fluence 12.9 J/cm2. The distance between the fiber tip and the surface of ulcer was 1 cm, with the approximate optical spot diameter 7 mm. Laser therapy was implemented once daily for continuous 3 days.
Medication group was treated with Triamcinolone Acetonide Dental Paste (triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%, Bright Future Pharmaceutical Lab. Ltd, Hong Kong) three times a day until the lesion was healed.
The participants were advised not to take any other topical or systemic medications beyond the project during the study.
Clinical assessment
Pain
Spontaneous pain means patient perception of pain without any activity and external stimuli. Functional pain means pain of lesion when chewing, drinking, and speaking. Participants were asked to record the pain intensity using a visual analogic scale (VAS) before treatment, immediately after laser therapy for the first time, and on days 1, 3, and 7.
Healing
As the criteria for healing of the ulcer, we recorded the day in which the lesion was re-epithelized while a vague outline of the lesion was still visible in clinical examination.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0. The descriptive statistics was used for presenting the general data. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences between the groups including gender of the patients and location of the lesions. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of the patient age and lesion size before treatment after testing by Shapiro-Wilk’s method. In case of non-normal distribution data, Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare the differences of pain scores at each point of assessment and healing days between the two groups. Wilcoxon test was used to compare the differences between before and immediately after treatment in laser group. Values of P < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.
Results
No complications or side effects were observed in the laser group. One patient missed the recall visit on day 2 and two patients failed to contact after laser treatment. In medication group, one patient discontinued the treatment because of nausea and one subject failed to contact. Among the remaining 51 patients, 25 patients finished their treatment in laser group and 26 in medication group (Fig. 1).
There were no significant correlations between patients’ gender, age,, and the studied parameters including lesion size and location within each group. The results from the statistical analysis are presented in Table 1.
Pain
VAS scoring results are presented in Table 2.
Spontaneous pain
No significant difference was noted in the spontaneous pain before treatment between the two groups (P > 0.05). Pain scores were significantly less in the laser group on days 1 and 3 (P < 0.01); however, the difference was not significant on day 7 (P > 0.05).
Functional pain
No significant difference was noted in the functional pain before treatment between the two groups (P > 0.05). Immediately after laser treatment for the first time, pain intensity was significantly reduced (P = 0.000). However, pain scores picked up subsequently and there was no significant difference between the two groups on day 1. Significant difference was noted between the two groups on day 3 and day 7 (P < 0.05).
Healing
There was a significant difference in the healing time between the two groups; however, the order of difference is small albeit of statistical significance (Table 2).
Discussion
Nowadays, LLLT is commonly known as photobiomodulation (PBM), which includes the therapeutic use of laser and light emitting diode (LED) [19].
Although there have been a considerable number of clinical trials, animal experiments, and in vitro studies demonstrating the positive effects of LLLT on pain relief, inflammation alleviation, and wound healing promotion, the mechanism remains indistinct.
Therapeutic effects by LLLT are initiated by light absorption of photo-acceptors locating in mitochondria which triggers a series of biochemical responses at the molecular, cellular, and tissular levels [20]. Cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) containing two heme-iron centers and two copper centers is the primary chromophore [21]. Light activation of CCO provokes the mitochondrial respiratory chain reaction inducing the phosphorylation of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The phosphorylation produces abundant free radicals such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) [22]. Positive effects can be also achieved by dissociation of inhibitory NO from CCO which leads to a boost of ATP production and to a reduction of the oxidative stress by modulating prooxidant and antioxidant mediators [23]. Another hypothesis proposes that laser irradiation can initiate an influx of calcium ions Ca2+ , following by activation of a series of signaling pathways [24].
On the whole, laser absorption by the target tissue triggers a chain of events, which accelerates the cell activities stimulating the production of serum reactive factor and superoxide dismutase, increasing the synthesis of serotonin and endorphins, and improving procollagen synthesis and macrophage activation, etc. [25, 26]. These biochemical effects at cellular level are continued with subsequent biological effects at tissue level including but more than pain alleviation, inflammation inhibition, immunomodulation, wound healing, and tissue regeneration.
The biological effects by laser therapy are dependent on several protocol parameters such as wavelength, dose, power density, emission mode, irradiation technique, number and timetable of the sessions, and duration of the therapeutic treatment [27]. Different types of laser with various exposition parameters and methods of application were used in former clinical studies on RAS. Nd:YAG laser, CO2 laser, and diode laser with wavelength in the range of 658 to 10,600 nm and power between 0.005 and 5 W have been reported to treat RAS [15,16,17]. The type of irradiation can be a continuous wave or a pulsed light consisting of energy density ranging from 3 to 110.67 J/cm2 [15,16,17]. Clinical trials demonstrated different conclusions by reason of various designs and devices with diverse parameters. As a whole, most researchers expressed the positive effect of laser therapy on RAS concerning pain relief, wound healing, or both [28]. Tezel et al. compared the effects of Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 2 W, 20 HZ in pulsed mode, once at the first visit) and topical corticosteroid, with the results suggesting that laser had lower rates of pain and post-treatment adverse events [15]. De Souza et al. compared InGaAlP Diode laser (670 nm, 50 mW and 3 J/cm2 in continuous mode) with topical corticosteroid and found that laser therapy effected on immediate pain relief while the later pain relief and improvement in wound healing were not significantly different comparing with topical medication [29]. Lalabonova and Daskalov assessed the therapeutic effect of Diode laser (658 nm, 27 mW, and 2 J/ cm2 in continuous waveform, once daily until symptoms abated) versus topical granofurin and solcosery, concluding that laser therapy was better in pain management and epithelization acceleration [30]. Jijin et al. compared a diode laser (810 nm, 0.1 W, 6 J/cm2, irradiation time 30 s for 3 applications daily for three sessions totally ) with 5% amlexanox and found both therapies were equally effective in relieving pain and promoting ulcer healing [31]. However, whether laser therapy a better option than traditional medication treatment was still not clear owning to the deficiency of RCTs concerning on this topic.
Recently, diode laser with wavelength of 810 nm, which is in the near infrared (NIR) region, has been widely used and showed positive PBM effects in previous studies. The fact that NIR lights can penetrate tissues well and 810-nm light may arrive at above 5-mm depth beneath the surface although the thickness of oral epithelium is only about 100–800 μm [32, 33]. In our study, we did not limit the irradiation into the lesion but widened the scope to above 0.5 cm beyond the ulcer because healing of ulcers was achieved with great assistance of tissues around the lesion. An 810-nm laser on healing might be attributed to the photo biostimulative effects on healthy tissues around the lesion, which in turn induced migration of the peripheric keratinocytes and endothelial cells into the wounded zone and promoted re-epithelialization and angiogenesis [34]. Asheesh Gupta et al. evaluated the healing effects of LLLT mediated by different wavelengths of light in mice, discovering that cellular proliferation revealed by positive immunofluoresence staining for cytokeratin-14 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) across the wound surface and dermal granulation tissue was more evident under the irradiation of 810-nm laser, which pronounced a better stimulation of wound healing [34].
In our study, we used an 810-nm diode laser with parameters set up according to the instruction of the device. The results suggested that diode laser with the chosen parameters had better effects on pain relief comparing with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%. Of note, the mean pain scores were significantly lower in the laser group on day 3 in respect of spontaneous pain and functional pain. Pain intensity descended more quickly in laser treatment. In addition, there was a distinct advantage of sharp pain relief in laser therapy, in contrasted with a gradually decline observed in medication group. Although there was a significant difference in functional pain between the two groups on day 7, the total pain intensity actually had descended to a fairly low level at this time point, which was imperceptible or without detriment to patients’ chewing and speaking.
Although there was a significant difference concerning healing time between the laser and the medication group, the difference is small. A better outcome might be achieved by adjustment of parameters. According to the Arndt-Schulz law, there is a biphasic response to light irradiation that positive biostimulating effects depend on a proper dose which is neither excessive nor inefficient [35, 36]. Analgesic results have been reported with fluences widely ranging from 1 to 138 J/cm2, while considering wound healing and anti-inflammatory effect, the effective fluences are suggested to range from few mJ/cm2 to ten or a little more J/cm2 to trigger all the biochemical and cellular mechanisms [37,38,39]. A fluence lower than 12.9 J/cm2 applied for the RAS laser therapy might result in a more efficient outcome in clinical practice; however, it will be a further study to verify the supposition.
However, we still cannot confirm the proper or optimal parameters of this special device on RAS treatment from only one RCT. Besides, it was not possible to perform a conclusion from the results of the previous studies because there were no researches assessing the efficacy of lasers with similar parameters. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the appropriate parameter list for each optional laser device to promote the application of laser therapy on RAS. Furthermore, there is still a long way to go in laser therapy and more studies concerning ideal parameters (wavelength, power, energy density, etc.) of laser and treatment frequency are particularly needed.
Conclusion
An 810-nm diode laser with the chosen parameters in our study had better effects on pain relief comparing with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% on RAS. However, there is no distinct advantage concerning on wound healing.
References
Chavan M, Jain H, Diwan N, Khedkar S, Shete A, Durkar S (2012) Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a review. J Oral Pathol Med 41(8):577–583
Jurge S, Kuffer R, Scully C, Porter SR (2006) Mucosal diseases series. Number VI. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis 12:1–21
Edgar NR, Saleh D, Miller RA (2017) Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 10(3):26–36
Bagan JV, Sanchis JM, Milian MA, Penarrocha M, Silvestre FJ (1991) Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a study of the clinical characteristics of lesions in 93 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 20(8):395–397
Slebioda Z, Szponar E, Kowalska A (2013) Etiopathogenesis of recurrent aphthous stomatitis and the role of immunologic aspects: literature review. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 62(3):205–215
Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh J, Alhijawi MM, Zwiri AM, Scully C, Lynch E (2015) Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS): a preliminary within-subject study of quality of life, oral health impacts and personality profiles. J Oral Pathol Med 44(4):278–283
Tarakji B, Gazal G, Al-Maweri SA, Azzeghaiby SN, Alaizari N (2015) Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis for dental practitioners. J Int Oral Health 7(5):74–80
Belenguer-Guallar I, Jiménez-soriano Y, Claramunt-lozano A (2014) Treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 6(2):e168–e174
Scully C, Gorsky M, Lozada-Nur F (2003) The diagnosis and management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a consensus approach. J Am Dent Assoc 134(2):200–207
Vucicevic Boras V, Savage NW (2007) Recurrent aphthous ulcerative disease: presentation and management. Aust Dent J 52(1):10–15
Convissar RA, Massoumi-Sourey M (1992) Recurrent aphthous ulcers: etiology and laser ablation. Gen Dent 40(6):512–515
Lajos G (2009) Professor Endre Mester, the father of photobiomodulation. J Laser Dent 17(3):146–148
de Freitas LF, Hamblin MR (2016) Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 22(3):1–17
Vanja VB, Ana AR, Mato S, Dragana GP, Tihomir K, Željko V (2013) Applications of low level laser therapy. A Textbook of Adv Oral and Maxillofac Surg:327–339
Tezel A, Kara C, Balkaya V, Orbak R (2009) An evaluation of different treatments for recurrent aphthous stomatitis and patient perceptions: Nd:YAG laser versus medication. Photomed Laser Surg 27:101–106
Rajab M, Hazeem MI, Badeia RA (2013) Treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis with 940 nm diode laser. Tikrit J for Dental Sci 1:77–82
Prasad RS, Pai A (2013) Assessment of immediate pain relief with laser treatment in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 116(2):189–193
Teare M, Dimairo M, Shephard N (2014) Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials 15(1):264
Hamblin MR, Pires de Sousa MV, Arany PR, Carroll JD, Patthoff D (2015) Low level laser (light) therapy and photobiomodulation: the path forward. Proc. SPIE 9309 Mechanisms for low-light therapy X, 930902. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2084049
Karu TI (2010) Multiple roles of cytochrome c oxidase in mammalian cells under action of red and IR-A radiation. IUBMB Life 62(8):607–610
Capaldi RA, Malatesta F, Darley-Usmar VM (1983) Structure of cytochrome c oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta 726(2):135–148
Poyton RO, Ball KA (2011) Therapeutic photobiomodulation: nitric oxide and a novel function of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase. Discov Med 11(57):154–159
Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Afanasyeva NI (2005) Cellular effects of low power laser therapy can be mediated by nitric oxide. Lasers Surg Med 36(4):307–314
Hardie RC (2014) Photosensitive TRPs. Handb Exp Pharmacol 223(223):795–826
Piva JADAC, Abreu EMDC, Silva VDS et al (2011) Effect of low-level laser therapy on the initial stages of tissue repair: basic principles. Anais Brasileiros De Dermatologia 86(5):947–954
Pereira AN, Eduardo CDP, Matson E, Marques MM (2002) Effect of low-power laser irradiation on cell growth and procollagen synthesis of cultured fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med 31(4):263–267
Romagnoli E, Carfaro A (2017) PBM. Theoretical and applied concepts of adjunctive use of LLLT/PBM within clinical dentistry. In: Coluzzi DJ, Parker SPA (eds) Lasers in dentistry-current concepts. Springer Nature, Cham, pp 135–140
Suter VGA, Sjölund S, Bornstein MM (2017) Effect of laser on pain relief and wound healing of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 32(4):953–963
De Souza TO, Martins MA, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, Tanji EY, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Martins MD (2010) Clinical evaluation of low-level laser treatment for recurring aphthous stomatitis. Photomed Laser Surg 28:S85–S88
Lalabonova H, Daskalov H (2014) Clinical assessment of the therapeutic effect of low-level laser therapy on chronic recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 28:929–933
Jijin MJ, Rakaraddi M, Pai J, Jaishankar HP, Krupashankar R, Kavitha AP, Anjana R, Shobha R (2016) Low-level laser therapy versus 5% amlexanox: a comparison of treatment effects in a cohort of patients with minor aphthous ulcers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121(3):269–273
Ash DM, Donne K, Bashford T (2017) Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med. Sci 32(8):1909–1918
Collins LM, Dawes C (1987) The surface area of the adult human mouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and oral mucosa. J Dent Res 66(8):1300–1302
Gupta A, Dai T, Hamblin MR (2014) Effect of red and near-infrared wavelengths on low-level laser (light) therapy-induced healing of partial-thickness dermal abrasion in mice. Lasers Med Sci 29(1):257–265
Huang YY, Chen CH, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR (2009) Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response 7(4):358–383
Cronshaw M, Parker S, Arany P (2019) Feeling the heat: Evolutionary and microbial basis for the analgesic mechanisms of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT). Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 37(9):517–526
Posten W, Wrone DA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Silapunt S, Alam M (2005) Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficacy. Dermatol Surg 31(3):334–340
Bjordal JM, Couppé C, Chow RT, Jan T, Ljunggren EA (2003) A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Aust J Physiother 49(2):107–116
Vallone F, Benedicenti S, Sorrenti E, Schiavetti I, Angiero F (2014) Effect of diode laser in the treatment of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Photomed Laser Surg 32(9):490–494
Funding
This work was supported by two funding projects: (1) Project supported by Hebei Key Research Development Program. (Grant No. 18277776D); (2) Project supported by government for cultivating excellent talents in clinical medicine (Grant No. 2019061441-2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Huo Xiao: Conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, investigation, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing.
Han Ning: Software and data curation.
Liu Li: Conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing, and project administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by Medical Ethics Committee of Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University.
Consent to participate
Both written and verbal informed consent were obtained from every participant.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huo, X., Han, N. & Liu, L. Effect of different treatments on recurrent aphthous stomatitis: laser versus medication. Lasers Med Sci 36, 1095–1100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03166-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03166-0