Introduction

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a dominant disorder affecting mostly skeletal and cardiac muscle. The most common clinical signs are myotonia, distal muscle weakness and atrophy. DM1 is caused by an expansion of (CTG)n repeats within the 3′ non-coding region of the DMPK gene. The mutant RNA, which contains 50 to several hundreds CTG repeats, is retained in nuclear aggregates that sequester the muscleblind-like-1 RNA-binding protein, which is essential for mRNA splicing, leading to a toxic effect on many functional processes in the nucleus.

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs), which are short non-coding RNA molecules, have been identified in various physiological and pathological conditions, in affected tissues (e.g., skeletal and cardiac muscle) and in body fluids [1]. MiRNAs exert a complex network of negative gene regulation by targeting messenger RNAs for translational repression or cleavage [1, 2], so that upregulation of a specific miRNA leads to a reduced expression of the corresponding protein product.

A subset of about 25 skeletal and cardiac muscle-specific miRNAs (myo-miRNAs) regulate muscle function and adaptation during development (proliferation, differentiation, quiescence, regeneration) and disease [3, 4]. Muscle gene expression is regulated by a transcriptional network, involving serum response factor (SRF), myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2), myogenic regulatory factor differentiation-1 (MyoD), Myf5, and myogenin. SRF and MEF2 cooperate with MyoD and myogenin to transcriptionally activate the expression of myo-miRNAs [1, 5].

Upregulation of miRNA-1 and miRNA-206 reduces myoblasts proliferation, increases myogenic differentiation and regeneration of muscle fibers [68]. Inhibition of miRNA-1 and miRNA-206 leads to delayed myogenesis. MiRNA-1 is a crucial regulator of gap junction proteins and muscle cells excitability (channels) and its deregulation has been suggested to contribute to the heart conduction defects seen in DM1 patients [9, 10]. MiRNA-133a/b increase myoblasts proliferation, promote cell growth, and decrease differentiation [8, 11].

In DM1, abnormal levels of myo-miRNAs have been found in muscle [5, 12, 13] but their action has not been investigated in relation to muscle pathology.

The aim of this study was to measure the levels of myo-miRNAs in muscle and compare the results with morphometric data of muscle fiber atrophy in biopsies.

Materials and methods

Muscle biopsy

A diagnostic vastus lateralis muscle biopsy was obtained after written consent and agreement from the local ethical committee. Muscle specimens were frozen in isopentane chilled in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C until used.

Muscle morphometry and morphology grading

We assigned a histopathological score to each biopsy according to the degree of changes observed by microscopic inspection, as follows (Fig. 1): score 1 = increased fiber size variability, increased internal nuclei; score 2 = as in score 1 and atrophic fibers, splitting of fibers; score 3 = as in score 2 and nuclear clumps, fibrosis, ring fibers, degenerating fibers.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different extent of muscle histopathological changes observed in DM1 patients. Histopathological score 1  a increased fiber size variability, occasional internal nuclei. Score 2 b atrophic fibers (arrow). Score 3 c interstitial connective tissue increase, nuclear clumps, atrophic fibers. The lower panel shows a correlation between the histopathological severity score and years of disease duration (Rank Spearman test: ρ = 0.68, p < 0.02)

Morphometric analysis was done on haematoxylin–eosin-stained sections, used to digitalize 3–5 non-overlapping random microscope fields. ImageJ software (v.1.34) was used to outline and measure fiber cross-sectional area and diameter of fibers. We also calculated the “fiber atrophy and hypertrophy factors” [14], which express the proportion of abnormally small or large fibers in the section. Briefly, the fibers in normal adult muscle are 40–80 μm diameter in males and 30–70 μm in females. Few fibers in the range of 30–40 μm would have less significance than the same number of fibers in the range of 10–20 μm. This is taken into account by multiplying the number of fibers with a diameter between 30 and 40 μm by 1, the number of fibers with a diameter between 20 and 30 by 2, the number of those from 10 to 20 by 3, and the number in the group <10 μm by 4. These products are then added together and divided by the total number of fibers. The resulting number is then multiplied by 1000 to obtain the “atrophy factor”.

In a subset of six patients in whom acid and alkaline ATP-ase-stained sections were available for the study, we measured also the morphometric parameters in type 1 and type 2 fibers.

miRNAs profiling and validation

miRNAs were purified from muscle using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed using TaqMan micro-RNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The resulting cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR using TaqMan micro-RNA assay primers (hsa-miRNA-1, hsa-miRNA-133a, hsa-miRNA-133b, hsa-miRNA-206) with the TaqMan universal mastermix-II and analyzed with an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detector System. Primer sequences are available on request. After median Ct values normalization, relative miRNA expression was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt method. The relative levels of miRNA expression were normalized to the housekeeping hsa-let-7a. TaqMan-PCR experiments were performed in triplicate. Values in DM1 patients are expressed as fold-change of controls.

Statistical analysis

Values in patients and controls were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t tests and the Spearman rank correlation test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Patients

The study population consisted of 12 DM1 patients (11 males, 1 female) in whom the clinical diagnosis of DM1 was confirmed by genetic testing (Table 1). Additional 8 DM1 patients have been investigated for muscle fiber morphometry in both type 1 and type 2 fibers (Supplementary Table 1), but these samples have not been used for miRNA analysis since no enough tissue was available for this investigation.

Table 1 Clinical and molecular data

The age of patients at biopsy ranged from 19 to 52 years (mean 32.2). The age at onset of symptoms ranged from 3 to 48 years, and the disease duration (time elapsed from onset to biopsy) ranged from 1 to 24 years (Table 1). As controls we used the vastus lateralis muscle biopsy obtained from 6 age-matched male subjects (aged 18–38 years, mean 29.3) who showed no signs of neuromuscular disorders and have been considered healthy controls.

Muscle morphometry and histopathology

In controls, the fiber diameter ranged from 48 to 64 μm (mean 55), the fiber cross-sectional area ranged from 2968 to 5118 μm2 (mean 3792), the atrophy factor ranged from 0 to 114 units (mean 43), and the hypertrophy factor ranged from 0 to 61 units (mean 12).

Histopathological analysis of muscle showed a variable degree of pathological features, including increased number of internal nuclei, increased fiber size variability with atrophic fibers and nuclear clumps, and proliferation of connective tissue (fibrosis).

Morphometric analysis showed that five male DM1 patients had a mild reduction of the mean fiber diameter (<50 μm), and increased values of the atrophy factor (260–727 units) (Table 2). All of these five cases were classified as severe or intermediate histopathological scores (score 3 or 2), as the result of chronic muscle changes which are possibly due to long disease duration (>20 years) in two cases (Fig. 1). One male patient had a mean fiber diameter below the normal range (37 μm) and the highest value of atrophy factor (829 units), indicating both a generalized fiber hypotrophy and scattered fiber atrophy, despite a short disease duration and mild histopathological score (score 1). The remaining male patients had normal values of fiber size and atrophy factor.

Table 2 Muscle morphometry and pathological data

Increased values of hypertrophy factors were found in three male patients, two of whom had normal atrophy factor and 1 had mildly increased atrophy factor.

In the six cases in whom a morphometric analysis of type 1 and type 2 fibers was done, a severe atrophy of type 1 fibers was found in two cases who also showed a moderate atrophy of type 2 fibers. Hypertrophy factor was never increased in type 1 fibers, while it was increased in type 2 fibers in 2 cases (Table 2). Type 1 fiber atrophy was also found in 6 of 8 additional patients (Supplementary Table 1), confirming this histopathological hallmark of the disease.

Although the histopathological score was not correlated with morphometric parameters of fiber size, it was inversely correlated (ρ = 0.68, p < 0.02) with disease duration (Fig. 1): more severe score (score 3) was observed in four patients who had either a long disease duration (>20 years) and/or a large CTG expansion, indicating that this qualitative score offers further information than the data provided by quantitative parameters of fiber size.

miRNA levels in muscle, comparison with histopathological features

In this study we investigated the expression in DM1 muscle of the four myo-miRNAs which are the most frequently analyzed in human muscle disease: we found a significant decrease of miRNA-1, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-133b, while the levels of miRNA-206 were significantly higher in patients than controls (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histograms showing myo-miRNA expression levels in muscle of DM1 patients. The values are expressed as fold-change of control mean (set at 1): as compared to controls, miRNA-1 and miRNA-133a were significantly decreased; miRNA-133b was not significantly reduced and miRNA-206 was significantly elevated. The asterisks show a significant difference (p < 0.05). Individual values in the 12 DM1 patients are shown in the panels on the right, showing individual variability probably related to different age of patients and different muscle adaptation to the disease

Although the lowest levels of miRNA-1 and miRNA-133a and miRNA-133b, and the highest levels of miRNA-206 were observed in patients with either severe histopathological score or long disease duration, the histopathological score did not significantly correlate with the levels of myo-miRNAs (Fig. 2; Table 2).

Discussion

Muscle myo-miRNAs and fiber morphometry

The predominant change in muscle biopsies in the majority of our series of DM1 patients was a mild fiber atrophy involving several scattered fibers.

We observed a reduced expression of miRNA-1, miRNA-133a, miRNA-133b in the muscle of DM1 patients, confirming previous results obtained on muscle tissues of DM1 patients [9, 13, 15]; other studies on DM1 muscles have shown either no changes in miRNA-133a/b [5, 12] or an overexpression of miRNA-1 [5]. This discrepancy with our data may be explained by the different muscles analyzed, the different method for normalization of results, the number of CTG repeats, or the age of patients.

MiRNA-1 is considered to be a member of the group of “degenerative miRNAs”, which may be critical mediators of cell death, contributing to apoptotic/necrotic myofiber loss [13]. The levels of miRNA-1 and miRNA-133 in DM1 muscle should, therefore, be markers of the residual muscle mass [16]; their levels were found to be reduced by 10% in the muscle of healthy subjects after 7 days of bed rest, reflecting the metabolic and molecular response of muscle to lack of exercise [17].

On the other hand, we found an overexpression of miRNA-206 in DM1 muscle, as previously observed in the muscle of both DM1 [12] and DMD patients [18], and in activated satellite cells and proliferating myoblasts. MiRNA-206 belongs to the group of “regenerative miRNAs” [18], and its levels in muscle can be used to establish regeneration potential [19]. MiRNA-206 has also been implicated in promoting regeneration of neuromuscular synapses and preventing muscle atrophy.

An interesting issue arising from our results is the disease specificity of the abnormal myo-miRNA expression found in DM1 patients. A comparison of myo-miRNA plasma levels in DM1 patients and in patients affected with a series of different muscular dystrophies (i.e., DMD, BMD, LGMD, FSHD1) showed that myo-miRNA were significantly increased in progressive muscular dystrophies but not in DM1 [20], and their increase was suggested to be possibly related to an active regeneration process occurring in progressive muscular dystrophies, while it is almost absent in DM1.

Muscle weakness and wasting are the main clinical features of DM1, and although they are progressive over time, the rate of muscle deterioration varies between patients. Disease severity can be assessed by physical examination, but the progression of muscle wasting can only be monitored by muscle imaging (CT, MRI). Myo-miRNA levels appear to be reduced when muscle wasting is stabilized and increased in muscle atrophy [21].

Pathological involvement and dysregulation of myo-miRNA seem to be related to muscle atrophy that could differently affect the slow or fast fiber types. Since it is well known that type 1 fibers are selectively affected in DM1, it is likely that such changes are due not only to activity but also to other cellular processes.

The originality of our study is to investigate these regulatory molecules and compare them with histopathological features. Nowadays, DM1 muscle biopsies are scanty, since most patients are diagnosed by genetic analysis; therefore, our study offers a unique opportunity to present these data.

We demonstrated an altered expression of myo-miRNAs in DM1 patients. These data highlight the value of myo-miRNAs regulation in DM1 and investigate muscle adaptation and pathological features in this multisystem disorder. The original approach used in this study might be prospectively used in a number of different neuromuscular patients to monitor both disease progression and effectiveness of new drugs or novel rehabilitative treatments.