Abstract
Nb-doped cathode materials with the formula Li(Ni0.7Mn0.3)1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) have been prepared successfully by calcining the mixtures of LiOH·H2O, Nb2O5, and Ni0.7Mn0.3(OH)2 precursor formed through a simple continuous co-precipitation method. The effects of Nb substitution on the crystal structure and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 were studied systematically by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and various electrochemical measurements. The results show that the lattice parameters of the Nb substitution LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 samples are slightly larger than that of pure LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2, and the basic α-NaFeO2 layered structure does not change with the Nb doping. What’s more, better morphology, lower resistance, and good cycle stability were obtained after Nb substitution. In addition, CV test exhibits that Nb doping results in lower electrode polarization and XPS results indicate that the valence of Mn kept constant but the component of Ni3+ decreased after doping. All the results indicate that Nb doping in LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 is a promising method to improve the properties of Ni-rich lithium-ion batteries positive-electrode materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, lithium-ion batteries have received intense attention as the power source in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), and full electric vehicles (EVs) among the currently available energy storage technologies due to their high energy density, long cycle life, and environment friendly [1, 2]. However, the traditional lithium-ion batteries commonly based on layered LiCoO2, LiMn2O4, and LiFePO4 can hardly fulfill the requirement of high-power applications. Thus, design and develop alternative positive-electrode materials with higher capacity, longer cycle life, and lower cost are one of the key challenges for lithium-ion batteries.
Due to its higher energy density than traditional cathode materials, more and more researchers focus their attention on Ni-rich cathode materials, such as LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 (NCA), LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 (622), LiNi0.7Mn0.15Co0.15O2, LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (811), and LiNixMn1−xO2 (x ≥ 0.6) [2]. Some of them have been applied in lithium-ion battery (LIB) systems as novel and promising positive-electrode materials. Unfortunately, their cycling and thermal stability are not satisfactory, further research is very urgent [3,4,5, 10, 17]. According to researchers’previous work, doping with small amounts of elements, such as Mo6+ [6], Al3+ [7], Cr3+ [8, 9], Mg2+ [8, 15, 16, 18], Fe3+ [11, 13], K+ [12], Zr4+ [14], Ti4+ [19, 20], is considered as an effective way to improve the electrochemical performance of Ni-rich cathode materials. Recent research progresses proved that Nb has become one of the most attractive candidates as doping elements since it can enhance the structural stability and electrical conductivity of cathode materials [21, 30]. Yi et al. [22, 23] reported that Nb-doped LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 can decrease the charge transfer resistance of LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 and improve the rate performance. Wu et al. [24] synthesized LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 and the high cutoff voltage performance was improved by Nb doping. Also, the electrochemical properties are significantly enhanced in lithium-rich layered cathode materials through niobium (Nb) doping [25], and corresponding theoretical calculations verify the results [26, 27]. However, the influence of Nb doping on structure and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 cathode materials have rarely been investigated.
In this paper, Nb-doped LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 was synthesized by calcining the mixtures of LiOH·H2O, Nb2O5, and Ni0.7Mn0.3(OH)2 precursor from a simple continuous co-precipitation method and the impact of Nb substitution on structure, charge transfer resistance, valence state of Ni and Mn, and electrochemical properties were mainly discussed.
Experimental
Material preparation
Nb-doped Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) cathode materials have been prepared successfully by calcining the mixtures of LiOH·H2O, Nb2O5, and Ni0.7Mn0.3(OH)2 precursor from a simple continuous co-precipitation method. Stoichiometric amounts of NiSO4·6H2O and MnSO4·H2O were dissolved in deionized water to form 2.0 mol/L mixed solutions of Ni and Mn. In the same way, 4 mol/L NaOH solution and proper amount of NH3·H2O solution were added to form the mixed alkaline solutions. Metal hydroxide precursors Ni0.7Mn0.3(OH)2 were prepared via co-precipitation in a continuously stirred tank reactor under 55 °C solutions, N2 atmosphere, and the pH of 11.2 ± 0.1. After the completion of the reaction, the resulting suspension was washed with distilled water several times and dried in an oven at 100 °C for about 24 h. Finally, the Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) cathode materials were obtained by calcining the mixtures of the hydroxide precursors, proper amount of Nb2O5, and 10% excess amount of LiOH·H2O (to compensate for lithium loss during the high-temperature calcination process [28]) at 550 °C for 6 h, subsequently at 820 °C for 15 h under flowing air condition.
Material characterization
The structures of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8 Advance, Cu-Kα radiation with a step of 0.02° at 40 kV and 40 mA). X-ray Rietveld refinement was performed with Reflex programs. The morphology and particle size of Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) were investigated with scanning electron microscopy (ZEISS EVO/MA10 with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV). The TEM images were obtained by a transmission electron microscope (FEI Tecnai G2 F20). In addition, the corresponding sample was dispersed into ethanol and transferred onto a Cu grid with holey carbon foil, then dried for TEM observation. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the cells were collected at room temperature on Ivium-n-Stat electrochemical workstation between 2.5 and 4.6 V with the scan rate of 0.1 mV s −1. EIS measurements were carried out in the same electrochemical station with 10 mV AC signal and a frequency range from 105 to 0.001 Hz. Charge-discharge performance was characterized galvanostatically in the voltage range of 2.75–4.35 V using a NEWARE cell test instrument at room temperature.
Battery preparation
The electrochemical performances of all samples were measured in the CR2032 coin-type half-cells. The cathode active materials slurry was prepared by mixing cathode material powders with Super P carbon black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) with a weight ratio of 90:4:6 in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidine (NMP) at room temperature. The slurry was stirred overnight and coated onto aluminum foil, then dried thoroughly at 120 °C. The resulting electrode film was subsequently pressed and punched into pellets and dried in a vacuum chamber at 60 °C for 12 h. Coin cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box with 1 M LiPF6 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) as the electrolyte solution, and Celgard 2300 polypropylene was employed as the separator.
Results and discussion
XRD phase
The results of X-ray diffraction patterns of the prepared Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) materials are respectively shown in Fig. 1. All samples could be indexed by a hexagonal α-NaFeO2 structure [29]. The slight split of (006)/(102) and (108)/(110) indicates that the products possess typical layered structure characteristics [30]. However, there is some impurity phase of Li3NbO4 in the patterns of Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]0.96Nb0.04O2, meaning that Nb5+ do not completely substitute Ni(Mn) 3a site. Moreover, with the x increase (x from 0 to 0.02), the (003) and (104) diffraction peaks slightly shift to lower 2θ, which means the interlayer spacing is extended after doping with Nb5+, so the diffusion coefficient of Li+ may increase [31].
Lattice constants shown in Table 1 were obtained by Rietveld refinement method and the results of X-ray diffraction patterns are illustrated in Fig. 1. The little difference between the experimental and calculated patterns and the low values of Rwp demonstrated that these were successful refinements. The lattice constant a and c and cell volume V expand regularly with the Nb-doping content increase, which is close to the results reported by Wu et al. [24]. This is attributed to the larger Nb5+ (0.64 Å) substitutes Ni3+ (0.56 Å) and Mn4+ (0.53 Å) sites. However, the change of cell parameters begins irregularly with the further increase of Nb content, which mainly because of the Nb5+ react with Li+ to form a new Li3NbO4 phase. According to the reports before [32], the integrated intensity ratio of (003) and (104) peaks (I(003)/I(104)) and the value of c/a, are regarded as an important index of the cation mixing. The larger I(003)/I(104) and c/a value, the lower Li+-Ni2+ ion mixing in the doped samples. Nb substitution has improved the crystallinity of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2.
Microtopography
The SEM images of Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) samples are shown in Fig. 2. Compared with the undoped sample, the particles of all the Nb substitution samples are made up of abundant small primary grains. This may increase the electrode-electrolyte contact area and facilitate the lithium-ion transportation, and then improve the electrochemical performance. But the average particle size of Nb substitution samples is about 10 μm, which was roughly same as the LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 sample. The spherical morphologies are similar with Li’s [25] report.
To further investigate the changes in microstructure and morphology for the LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 electrodes before and after Nb doping, TEM and HRTEM images were recorded as shown in Fig. 3. HRTEM images with different lattice spacing were detected and assigned to the {003} plane. Compared with the undoped samples, the lattice spacing of the samples doped by 2% Nb was 0.476 nm, which was slightly larger than the value of the undoped sample (0.470 nm). Nb doping made the lattice slightly expand in the c axis direction and increased the lattice spacing, which would be more conducive to the transmission of lithium ions. This conclusion was in agreement with the results discussed in the section on the XRD investigation.
Electrochemical performance
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is a useful electrochemical tool to study the redox behavior in an electrochemical reaction. Figure 4 shows cyclic voltammograms of Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) electrodes between 2.75 and 4.6 V with a scanning rate of 0.1 mV s−1, and values of the third cycle CV peak are listed in Table 2. The redox peaks mainly located near 3.9 V are ascribed to the oxidation/reduction of Ni2+/Ni4+or Ni3+/Ni4+, and small redox peaks appear near 4.3 V can be attributed to the phase transition of hexagonal to hexagonal (H2 to H3) for Ni-rich layered compounds [32, 34]. The first cycle is different from the subsequent ones due to the mechanism of initial activation and stabilization which forming a solid electrolyte inter-phase [33, 34] or the cation mixing [35]. Compared to the undoped sample, Nb-substituted samples exhibit less potential difference between anodic peak and cathodic peak (△ψV) showed in Table 2. All these results manifest that Nb substitution could reduce electrode polarization.
The initial charge/discharge curves and the capacity data of all the samples are shown in Fig. 5a and Table 3, respectively. It can be seen that the initial charge capacity of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 is 259.12 mAh/g, approaching their theoretical values of 274 mAh/g. However, with the increasing Nb doping, the initial discharge capacity decreased. As illustrated in Table 3, the electrodes with x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 deliver discharge capacities of 179.78, 184.32, 170.85, and 164.03 mAh/g, severally.
Figure 5b shows the cycling performance of Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) samples operated between 2.75 and 4.35 V at 0.2 C. The discharged capacity of pristine sample and Nb-doped sample (1, 2, 3, 4%) at the 50th cycle are 133.2, 150.6, 156.3, 144.2, and 141.7 mAh/g, respectively, which corresponds to capacity retention of 75.8, 90.0, 91.8, 89.9, and 88.3%. Therefore, Nb substitution could improve the cycle performance effectively.
The rate capability test results for the Li[Ni0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) cells are shown in Fig. 5c. Due to the internal polarization of lithium intercalation/deintercalation reaction, the discharge capacity of all electrode materials gradually decreased with the current density increased [36]. It is easy to find that the x = 0.02 sample exhibits better performance than x = 0 sample, especially at high rates. While the x = 0.04 sample manifests worse rate property due to the impurity Li3NbO4 phase in material. The expanded Li+ channels and the facilitated migration of Li+ ions in Nb5+ substitution samples (x = 0.01, 0.02, 0.03) contribute to the good rate performance. These results are consistent with the expectation from previous lattice analysis.
In order to investigate the internal resistance change between the 4th cycle and the 50th cycle, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurement (EIS) technology was applied; the EIS profiles are demonstrated in Fig. 6a, b, respectively. Rs, Rsf, and Rct calculated from EIS results are tabulated in Table 4. According to the reported references [24, 32], the symbols Rs, Rsf, Rct, and Zw represent the ohmic resistance between the working electrode and the reference electrode, the resistance for Li+ diffusion in the surface layer, the charge transfer resistance, and the Warburg impedance of solid phase diffusion, respectively. Obviously, the resistance for Li+ diffusion in the surface layer (Rsf) and the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of Nb-doped samples are very close to each other in Fig. 6 which is much smaller than LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2(x = 0). It reveals that the ionic conductivity was improved greatly by Nb doping and this is the reason of good electrochemical performance obtained before.
XPS analysis
As discussed above, LiNi[0.7Mn0.3]1−xNbxO2 materials with the x = 0.02 show the best electrochemical performance. To gain more insights into the oxidation state of transition metals in the layered LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 material and x = 0.02 sample, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were recorded as shown in Fig. 7. The Ni 2p spectra were composed of two main peaks, Ni2p 3/2 (855.52 eV) and Ni2p 1/2 (873 eV), which was attributed to Ni3+ ions based on the simple ionic model [37], but another small peak, Ni2p 3/2 (854.39 eV) was corresponding to Ni2+. The Ni was with the mixing valence states. More importantly, the relative peak area ratios of Ni3+/Ni2+ before and after doping were 7.7040 and 4.9575, respectively, meaning that the Ni3+ component gradually decreased, whereas the growth of the Ni2+ component at 854.39 eV became evident. The binding energy of Mn2p 3/2 was about 642.2 eV, in agreement with the value reported for MnO2 [38] in both two samples. The result indicated that the oxidation valence of Mn was kept constant in tetravalent, only Ni changed after doping.
Conclusion
Li(Ni0.7Mn0.3)1−xNbxO2 (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04) cathode materials have been prepared successfully by calcining the mixtures of LiOH·H2O, Nb2O5, and Ni0.7Mn0.3(OH)2 precursor formed through a simple continuous co-precipitation method. The effect of Nb substitution on the structure, morphology, and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 was investigated in detail. The results indicate that Nb substitution has an effective effect on the improvement of cycling performance of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2. Moreover, Nb substitution could decrease the electrode polarization and the 2% Nb-doped sample has the lowest charge transfer impedance, best cycling performance at 0.2 C under the potential of 2.75–4.35 V among all the doped samples. In the end, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) indicated that the Mn were kept tetravalent but Ni was in + 2 and + 3 mixing valence states and Ni3+ component decreased after doping. This study will be helpful for improving the cycle performance of cobalt-free Ni-rich cathode materials.
References
Xu B, Qian D, Wang Z, Meng YS (2012) Recent progress in cathode materials research for advanced lithium ion batteries. Mater Sci Eng R 73:51–65
Chen J (2013) Recent progress in advanced materials for lithium ion batteries. Mater 6(1):156–183
Sun YK, Lee DJ, Lee YJ, Chen Z, Myung ST (2013) Cobalt-free nickel rich layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Acs Appl Mater Inter 5(21):11434–11440
Kang J, Han B (2015) First-principles study on the thermal stability of LiNiO2 materials coated by amorphous Al2O3 with atomic layer thickness. Acs Appl Mater Inter 7(21):11599–11603
Liang CP, Kong FT, Longo RC, KC S, Kim JS, Jeon SH, Choi S, Cho K (2016) Unraveling the origin of instability in Ni-rich LiNi1–2xCoxMnxO2 (NCM) cathode materials. J Phys Chem C 120(12):6383–6393
Hwang S, Kim SM, Bak SM, Kim SY, Cho BW, Chung KY, Lee JY, Stach EA, Chang WY (2015) Using real-time electron microscopy to explore the effects of transition-metal composition on the local thermal stability in charged LixNiyMnzCo1-y-zO2 Cathode Materials. Chem Mater 27(11):3927–3935
Konishi H, Yoshikawa M, Hirano T (2013) The effect of thermal stability for high-Ni-content layer-structured cathode materials, LiNi0.8Mn0.1−xCo0.1MoxO2 (x =0, 0.02, 0.04). J Power Sources 244(4):23–28
Dianat A, Seriani N, Bobeth M, Cuniberti G (2013) Effects of Al-doping on the properties of Li–Mn–Ni–O cathode materials for Li-ion batteries: an ab initio study. J Mater Chem A 1(32):9273–9280
Zhang B, Li L, Zheng J (2012) Characterization of multiple metals (Cr, Mg) substituted LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode materials for lithium ion battery. J Alloy Comp 520:190–194
Lyu YC, Zhao NJ, Hu EY, Xiao RJ, Yu XQ, Gu L, Yang XQ, Li H (2015) Probing reversible multielectron transfer and structure evolution of Li1.2Cr0.4Mn0.4O2 cathode material for Li-ion batteries in a voltage range of 1.0–4.8 V. Chem Mater 27(15):5238–5252
Bak SM, Hu E, Zhou Y, Yu X, Senanayake SD, Cho SJ, Kim KB, Chung KY, Yang XC (2014) Structural changes and thermal stability of charged LiNixMnyCozO2 cathode materials studied by combined in situ time-resolved XRD and mass spectroscopy. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 6(24):22594–22601
Zhao T, Chen S, Chen R, Li L, Zhang X, Xie M, Wu F (2014) The positive roles of integrated layered-spinel structures combined with nanocoating in low-cost Li-rich cathode Li[Li0.2Fe0.1Ni0.15Mn0.55]O2 for lithium-ion batteries. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 6(17):21711–20720
Li Q, Li G, Fu C, Luo D, Fan J, Li L (2014) K+-doped Li1.2Mn0.54Co0.13Ni0.13O2: a novel cathode material with an enhanced cycling stability for lithium-ion batteries. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 6(13):10330–10341
Augustyn V, Therese S, Turner T, Manthiram A (2015) Nickel-rich layered LiNi1-xMxO2 (M = Mn, Fe, and Co) electrocatalysts with high oxygen evolution reaction activity. J Mater Chem A 3(32):16604–16612
Schipper F, Dixit M, Kovacheva D, Talianker M, Haik O, Grinblat J, Erickson EM, Ghanty C, Major DT, Markovsky B, Aurbach D (2016) Stabilizing nickel-rich layered cathode materials by a high-charge cation doping strategy: zirconium-doped LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2. J Mater Chem A 4(41):16073–16084
Cho J (2000) LiNi0.74Co0.26-xMgxO2 cathode material for a Li-ion cell. Chem Mater 12(10):3089–3094
Dou S (2013) Review and prospect of layered lithium nickel manganese oxide as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 17:911–926
Boulineau A, Simonin L, Colin JF, Canévet E, Daniel L, Sébastien P (2012) Evolutions of Li1.2Mn0.61Ni0.18Mg0.01O2 during the initial charge/discharge cycle studied by advanced electron microscopy. Chem Mater 24(18):3558–3566
Zhang Y, Wang ZB, Lei J, Li FF, Wu J, Zhang XG, Yu FD, Ke K (2015) Investigation on performance of Li(Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3)1−xTixO2 cathode materials for lithium-ion battery. Ceram Int 41(7):9069–9077
Kam KC, Mehta A, Heron JT, Doeff MM (2014) Electrochemical and physical properties of Ti substituted layered nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) cathode materials. J Electrochem Soc 159(8):A1383–A1392
Liu H, Li J, Zhang Z, Gong Z, Yang Y (2004) Structural, electrochemical and thermal properties of LiNi0.8−yTiyCo0.2O2 as cathode materials for lithium ion battery. Electrochim Acta 49(7):1151–1159
Yi TF, Yin LC, Ma YQ, Shen HY, Zhu YR, Zhu RS (2013) Lithium-ion insertion kinetics of Nb-doped LiMn2O4 positive-electrode material. Ceram Int 39(4):4673–4678
Yi TF, Xie Y, Zhu YR, Zhu RS, Ye MF (2012) High rate micron-sized niobium-doped LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 as ultra high power positive-electrode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 211:59–65
Wu JF, Liu HH, Ye XH, Xia JP, Lu Y, Lin CW, Yu XW (2015) Effect of Nb doping on electrochemical properties of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 at high cutoff voltage for lithium-ion battery. J Alloy Comp 644:223–227
Li X, Xin HX, Liu YF, Li D, Yuan XQ, Qin XY (2015) Effect of niobium doping on the microstructure and electrochemical properties of lithium-rich layered Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O2 as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Rsc Adv 5(56):45351–45358
Gao Y, Wang X, Ma J, Wang Z, Chen L (2015) Selecting substituent elements for Li-rich Mn-based cathode materials by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Chem Mater 27(9):3456–3461
Kong F, Longo RC, Park MS, Yoon J, Yeon DH, Park JH, Wang WH, KC S, Doo SG, Cho K (2015) Ab initio study of doping effects in LiMnO2 and Li2MnO3 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(16):8489–8500
Li Z, Chernova NA, Feng J, Upreti S, Omenya F, Whittingham MS (2012) Stability and rate capability of Al substituted lithium-rich high-manganese content oxide materials for Li-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 159(2):A116–A120
Li Y, Han Q, Ming X, Ren M, Li L, Ye W, Zhang X, Xu H, Li L (2014) Synthesis and characterization of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode material prepared by a novel hydrothermal process. Ceram Int 40(9):14933–14938
Li J, Tian Y, Xu C (2012) Influence of Nb5+ doping on structure and electrochemical properties of spinel Li1.02Mn2O4. J Mater Sci Technol 28(9):817–822
Zhao R, Yang Z, Chen JC, Chen Z, Liang J, Chen H (2015) Novel solvo/hydrothermal assisted co-precipitation method for faceted LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathode material. J Alloy Comp 627:206–210
Hashem AMA, Abdel-Ghany AE, Eid AE, Trottier J, Zaghib K, Manger A, Julien CM (2011) J Power Sources 196(20):8632–8637
Zhong S, Lai M, Yao W, Li Z (2016) Synthesis and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.8CoxMn0.2-xO2 positive-electrode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 212:343–351
Zhong S, Chen P, Yao W (2015) Ni-rich layered oxide Li1.05(Ni0.7Mn0.3)O2 as a highly reversible cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. Ecs Electrochem Lett 4(6):A45–A48
Zhen C, Jin W, Chao DL, Baikie T, Bai LY, Chen S, Zhao YL, Sum TC, Lin JY, Shen ZX (2016) Hierarchical porous LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 nano-/micro spherical cathode material: minimized cation mixing and improved Li+ mobility for enhanced electrochemical performance. Sci Rep 6:25771–25780
Li LJ, Li XH, Wang ZX, Guo HJ, Yue P, Chen W, Wu L (2011) A simple and effective method to synthesize layered LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode materials for lithium ion battery. Powder Technol 206(3):353–357
Kim D, Lim JM, Lim YG, Yu JS, Park MS, Cho M, Cho K (2015) Design of nickel-rich layered oxides using d electronic donor for redox reactions. Chem Mater 27(18):6450–6456
Zhang J, Lu QW, Fang JH, Wang JL, Yang J, NuLi YN (2014) Polyimide encapsulated lithium-rich cathode material for high voltage lithium-ion battery. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 6(20):17965–17973
Funding
This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Fund of China (No. 51372104), Jiangxi Province Science and Technology Plan Project (grant nos. 20141BBE50019, 20151BBE50106), Youth science fund program of Jiangxi science and technology bureau (grant no. 2010GQC0064), and Jiangxi Provincial Education Office Natural Science Fund Project (GJJ170510).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Luo, C., Wang, C. et al. Effects of Nb substitution on structure and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.7Mn0.3O2 cathode materials. J Solid State Electrochem 22, 2811–2820 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-018-3975-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-018-3975-2