Abstract
Yeasts from cold environments have a wide range of strategies to prevent the negative effects of extreme conditions, including the production of metabolites of biotechnological interest. We investigated the growth profile and production of metabolites in yeast species isolated from cold environments. Thirty-eight strains were tested for their ability to grow at different temperatures (5–30 °C) and solute concentrations (3–12.5% NaCl and 50% glucose). All strains tested were able to grow at 5 °C, and 77% were able to grow with 5% NaCl at 18 °C. We were able to group strains based on different physicochemical/lifestyle profiles such as polyextremotolerant, osmotolerant, psychrotolerant, or psychrophilic. Five strains were selected to study biomass and metabolite production (glycerol, trehalose, ergosterol, and mycosporines). These analyses revealed that the accumulation pattern of trehalose and ergosterol was related to each lifestyle profile. Also, our findings would suggest that mycosporines does not have a role as an osmolyte. Non-conventional fermentative yeasts such as Phaffia tasmanica and Saccharomyces eubayanus may be of interest for trehalose production. This work contributes to the knowledge of non-conventional yeasts with biotechnological application from cold environments, including their growth profile, metabolites, and biomass production under different conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cold environments comprise nearly 80% of the geosphere, with average temperatures below 5 °C (Cavicchioli et al. 2011). These environments have physicochemical factors that affect life development, such as high UV radiation, low water potential, low nutrient availability, high hydrostatic pressure, and oxidative stress (Margesin and Miteva 2011; Goordial et al. 2013; Buzzini et al. 2017). The above conditions make cold environments extreme for life and are generally inhabited by organisms with special adaptations belonging to Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya, including yeasts, filamentous fungi, protists, and lichens (Cantrell 2017; Buzzini et al. 2018). Yeasts exhibit various adaptations to living and survive under extreme conditions (Yusof et al. 2021), and some are considered polyextremotolerant because they can tolerate many different types of stress (Gostincăr et al. 2018). On the other hand, there are specialized extremophilic and extremotolerant species that cope efficiently with a given stressor and are limited in their ability to shift habitat (Gostincăr et al. 2010; Buzzini et al. 2018).
Yeasts adapted to extreme cold conditions are able to synthesize molecules that act as cryoprotectants and/or osmolytes, protecting cells from damage due to intracellular ice formation and desiccation during freeze–thaw cycles. Metabolites recognized as cryoprotectants include: Glycerol (Alcaíno et al. 2015), trehalose (Eleutherio et al. 2015; Feofilova et al. 2014; Ianutsevich et al. 2020), ergosterol (Lingwood and Simons 2010; Liu et al. 2015; Dupont et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2023), and mycosporines (Mycosporine-glutaminol-glucoside: MGG) (Moliné et al. 2014; Kogej et al. 2006). In yeast and other fungi, glycerol is the major solute regulating cell turgor under conditions of high extracellular osmolarity. Its production plays a role not only in protecting against osmotic stress, but also in maintaining redox balance and the pool of inorganic phosphate in the cytoplasm. In addition, glycerol can be used as a carbon and energy source by some yeast cells (Dakal et al. 2014; Semkiv et al. 2017). Trehalose has been described for its role in protecting against the effects of freezing, low temperatures, and desiccation. It is a unique cryoprotectant that protects not only cell macromolecules but also membranes under stress conditions and has antioxidant and regulatory functions (Li et al. 2008; Tsuji 2016; Ianutsevich et al. 2020). In yeast S. cerevisiae, stress or starvation can lead to fluctuations in trehalose content from less than 1% to more than 20% of cell dry weight (Eleutherio et al. 2015; Feofilova et al. 2014).
Ergosterol is a component found in the membrane of all fungi. Concentration levels of ergosterol can change due to desiccation and osmotic stress resistance (Dupont et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2023). It contributes to fluidity, permeability, microdomain formation, and membrane protection, along with other sterols (Lingwood and Simons 2010; Dupont et al. 2012). Yeast mycosporines protect against UV radiation and have antioxidant activity (Moliné et al. 2014; Pajarola 2015). Kogej et al. (2006) suggested that MGG could serve as a compatible osmolyte for osmoregulation since the concentration of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) and MGG in some microorganisms is linked to the salinity of the medium. These metabolites are crucial for survival in extreme environments and have biotechnological potential as well.
We conducted a study on the growth profile of 38 yeasts isolated from Patagonia Argentina and Antarctica. We evaluated their production of secondary metabolites under different temperatures and osmotic concentrations to understand their response to cold and osmotic stress.
Materials and methods
Yeast strain
Thirty-eight yeast strains belonging to the classes Microbotryomycetes (Glaciozyma sp., Cryolevonia sp., Leucosporidium sp., Sampaiozyma sp.); Tremellomycetes (Phaffia sp., Mrakia sp., Tausonia sp., Vishniacozyma sp.); Dothideomycetes (Aureobasidium sp.); and Saccharomycetales (Saccharomyces sp., Metschnikowia sp., Debaryomyces sp.) were studied (Table 1).
All strains come from the yeast culture collection of the Centro de Referencia en Levaduras y Tecnología Cervecera (CRELTEC), IPATEC (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue). Phaffia sp. and Saccharomyces sp. strains were included as references with high biotechnological potential.
Cultivation of yeasts in solid medium
The effect of osmotic and thermal stress on the growth of the selected yeasts was assessed in plates containing MYP media (g L−1: malt extract 7; yeast extract 0.5; soy peptone 2.5; agar 2) supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl: 0%, 3%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%; and glucose: 50%; and both 10% NaCl + 5% glucose. The plates were inoculated with 10 μL of a calibrated suspension (1 × 106 cells mL1) of yeast cells and grown for 24–48 h. Each one of these plates was incubated at different temperatures: 5 °C, 12.5 °C, 18 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C and 35 °C. Colony development was recorded at 5, 10, and 20 days according to Kurtzman et al. (2011). Positive growth, was considered when observed growth after 5 days of inoculation (value 1 in cluster analysis); delayed growth, positive growth was observed after 10 days of inoculation (value 0.66 in cluster analysis); slow growth, growth develops slowly over a period exceeding 2 weeks (value 0.33 in cluster analysis); 0 negative growth.
Strain selection and liquid culture
Based on their growth profile, taxonomy, and biotechnological potential, five yeast strains were selected for the analysis of secondary metabolites accumulation in liquid culture: Vishniacozyma victoriae CRUB 2064, Debaryomyces hansenii CRUB 2079, Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T, Saccharomyces eubayanus CRUB 1939 and Mrakia sp. CRUB 1272. Selected strains were cultured in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of modified MMS liquid medium (g L−1: glucose 10, bacto-peptone 4.5, KH2PO4 2, MgSO4.7H2O 0.5, yeast extract 1), and inoculated with the respective cultures in order to obtain 1 × 106 cells mL1 and cultivated at 200 rpm under two different osmotic concentrations (without NaCl and with 5% NaCl) and two incubation temperatures (5 °C and 18 °C). The number of cells per mL was estimated for each sample using a Neubauer chamber. Samples from flasks incubated at 5 °C samples were taken every 48 h, and samples from flasks incubated at 18 °C were taken every 24 h until the stationary phase was reached. Growth parameters including maximum specific growth rate and lag phase duration, were calculated from each treatment by directly fitting cell count versus time to the reparameterized Gompertz equation proposed by Zwietering et al. (1990):
y = A* exp(− exp(((m * e)/A)- (l − t) + 1)).
where y = ln (Nt / N0), N0 is the initial cells/mL and Nt cells at time t; A = ln (N∞/N0) is the maximum cells production with N∞ as the asymptotic maximum, m is the maximum growth rate (h − 1), and l the period of time needed to reach stationary phase.
The growth data from each treatment and strain were fitted by a non-linear regression procedure, minimizing the sum of squares of the difference between experimental data and the fitted model, i.e., loss function (observed − predicted). This analysis was conducted using the non-linear module of Statistica 6.0 software package and its Quasi-Newton option (Arroyo Lopez et al. 2009).
Extraction and analysis of secondary metabolites
Trehalose, ergosterol, glycerol, and mycosporines, were measured in biomass when each strain reached stationary phase at 5 and 18 °C. Glycerol was also measured in cell-free supernatant. Cultures were incubated in the conditions mentioned above. For trehalose extraction, the method of Hodge (1962) with modifications was used; 1 g of dry cells was incubated for 40 min with 200 uL of 500 mM trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at room temperature. The extract was measured at 620 nm by the anthrone method, and trehalose standard 99% Sigma-Aldrich® was used for quantification. For ergosterol extraction, the method described by Shaw and Jefferies (1953) with modifications was used. Known aliquots of yeast biomass were suspended in 1.5 ml of methanol: KOH (25:10) and 1.5 ml of distilled water and incubated at 90 °C for 2 h. Petroleum ether (3 ml) was used as a solvent for ergosterol, and the complete extraction was attained after three subsequent extractions. The final fractions of ether were collected, washed with 10 mL of distilled water, and recorded. Quantitative analysis was carried out at 283 nm using ergosterol molar extinction coefficient, Ɛ = 1.26 × 104 (Shaw & Jefferies 1953; Olson and Knizley 1962). For glycerol determination, Free Glycerol Reagent—Sigma-Aldrich® commercial kits were used in the cell-free supernatant. for this 2 mL of culture was centrifuged and washed, suspended in 1 mL of water, heated to 90 °C for 10 min, and centrifuged for 1 min at maximum speed. The supernatant was recovered, and the glycerol content was determined using the commercial kit mentioned before. A solution of glycerol 99% Sigma-Aldrich® 26 mg mL−1 was used as an internal standard.
MGG production was carried out in flasks incubated under two conditions, light and darkness. Darkness was achieved by covering the flask with aluminum foil, while flasks in light conditions were incubated in a Sedemix I500PF incubator chamber, under constant light provided by 6 white fluorescent lamps, General Electric T8, and 3 Toshiba FL40T8BRF lamps. Extraction and quantification were performed according to the method described by Moliné et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis was carried out at 310 nm using the MGG molar extinction coefficient, Ɛ = 2.5 × 104. The concentration of all analyzed metabolites was expressed as mg per g of dry biomass. Dry cell biomass was measured in dried samples (85 °C until constant weight) obtained from 0.5 mL of culture in the stationary phase.
Statistical analysis
The growth profile of 38 studied strains (19 species) was analyzed using cluster analysis with Euclidean distance in R package gplots (Warnes et al. 2015). To investigate the effects of temperature and osmotic stress on metabolite production, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, adjusting the significant differences by Bonferroni correction. When parametric analysis was not possible, an ANOVA on ranks was performed by the Kruskal–Wallis method (p < 0.05). The statistical software SigmaPlot 11.0 and GraphPad Prism 5 were used for data analysis.
Results
Analysis of yeast growth in different culture conditions
We studied the growth patterns of 38 strains of yeast under different osmotic and temperature conditions and found high variability. Through cluster analysis and heatmap analysis, we identified three groups (Fig. 1).
The first group (G1) included polyextremotolerant yeast strains that can grow in all tested salinity conditions, including 10% NaCl and 5% glucose, and a wide range of temperatures. This group comprised five strains belonging to different taxonomic groups, including Metschnikowia australis, Debaryomyces hansenii (Order: Saccharomycetales), and Vishniacozyma victoriae (Order: Tremellales), all of which were isolated from Antarctic seawater (Table 1).
The second group (G2) was the most heterogeneous, with 28 strains separated into three subgroups (A, B, and C). Subgroup A included ten yeast strains from the Saccharomyces genus that were osmotolerant and able to grow in a range of 5–30 degrees with salt concentrations up to 7.5% and showed growth with glucose concentrations up to 50% at 25 °C. Subgroup B comprised 13 strains belonging to different genera (Aureobasidium, Sampaiozyma, Phaffia, Tausonia, Vishniacozyma, and Glaciozyma) isolated from various substrates, which can be considered psychrotolerant. Subgroup C included five yeast strains from the Mrakia genus that exhibited a psychrophilic profile.
Finally, the third cluster (G3) contained only yeasts of the recently described species Cryolevonia giraudoae isolated from glacier ice (Fig. 1) (de Garcia et al. 2020). These strains were able to grow only at 5 °C without NaCl and had an extreme profile with low capability to survive in a changing environment in terms of temperature and salinity.
We selected two strains from G1 (Debaryomyces hansenii CRUB 2079, Vishniacozyma victoriae CRUB 2064), and representatives of the subgroups A, B, and C from G2 (Saccharomyces eubayanus CRUB 1939, Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T and Mrakia sp. CRUB 1272) to study their growth patterns. They were grown in liquid culture at two temperatures (5 and 18 °C) and two different osmotic conditions (0% NaCl and 5% NaCl), showing variable growth rate (μ) ranging from 0.157 to 0.003, and significant differences (p < 0.05) (Table 2; Fig. 2). Each strain exhibited a growth pattern consistent with its specific profile, which we describe in detail.
Vishniacozyma victoriae
Strain V. victoriae CRUB 2064 did not show significant differences in growth values, except for 5 °C with 5% NaCl, in these conditions the lowest μ value was observed (0.02) (p < 0.05) (Table 2; Fig. 2a). The final biomass production was similar in all the tested conditions (0.026 to 0.03 g mL−1). Glycerol production was highest at 5 °C with 5% NaCl (562.7 ± 34.2 mg g−1). Extracellular glycerol was also detected in this condition (19.7 ± 6.5 mg g−1) (Fig. 3). Trehalose was produced in higher amounts at 5 °C without NaCl, 103.1 ± 12.1 mg g−1 (Fig. 4). Ergosterol values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) at 18 °C with NaCl (6.2 ± 0.15 mg g−1) (Fig. 5).
V. victoriae CRUB 2064 produces mycosporines, the higher values were observed at 18 °C with light and without NaCl (3.5 ± 0.7 mg g−1). NaCl had a negative impact on the accumulation of this metabolite, it was 78% lower (1.17 ± 0.35 mg g−1) under this condition. A similar effect was observed when the strain was cultured in darkness (Fig. 6). No mycosporines accumulation was observed when the growth temperature was set at 5 °C in any of the mentioned conditions.
Debaryomyes hansenii
Debaryomyes hansenii CRUB 2079 showed significant differences in growth at different temperatures (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed between different NaCl concentrations at each temperature. The final biomass production varied from 0.02 to 0.05 g mL−1 (Table 2; Fig. 2b). Glycerol production showed the lowest concentrations at 18 °C without NaCl (60 ± 0.7 mg g−1), but did not show significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). For trehalose exhibited higher amounts at 5 °C without NaCl (49.72 ± 9.7 mg g−1), and its accumulation was negatively affected at 5 °C and 18 °C with NaCl (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). Ergosterol concentration was significantly higher at 18 °C with 5% NaCl (6.15 ± 0.9 mg g−1), while no statistically significant differences were observed for the rest of the culture conditions (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5). No mycosporines were produced in any condition tested.
Saccharomyces eubayanus
Saccharomyces eubayanus CRUB 1939 showed significant differences for each treatment and had maximum growth rate at 18 °C without 5% NaCl (μ: 0.06) and minimum growth rate at 5 °C with 5% NaCl (μ: 0.003) (Fig. 2b, Table 2). Intracellular glycerol was higher under 5% NaCl regardless of the temperature (5ºC: 175.8 ± 3.83; 18 °C: 166.2 ± 6.78 mg g−1) (Fig. 3). Trehalose production only showed significantly lower values at 5 °C with NaCl, in the remaining condition the production ranging from 97 to 103 mg g−1 (Fig. 4). Regarding ergosterol production, no significant variation was observed among treatments (5.39 ± 0.84 to 4.46 ± 0.17 mg g−1) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5). No mycosporines were produced in any condition tested.
Phaffia tasmanica
Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T showed significant differences in growth at 5 °C with and without 5% NaCl (μ: 0.01), where at these conditions’ biomass production was significantly lower (0.0059 g mL−1) (p < 0.05) (Table 2; Fig. 2d). However, intracellular glycerol production was higher at 5 °C with 5% NaCl (804.9 ± 148.3 mg g−1) (Fig. 3). Regarding trehalose, the maximum values were observed at 18 °C (110 ± 10.4 mg g−1), and at 5 °C the production was significantly lower (48.3 ± 2.43 mg g−1) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). Similarly, the ergosterol accumulation was significantly higher at 18 °C with NaCl (7.72 ± 0.8 mg g−1), while no statistically significant differences were observed for the rest of the culture conditions (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5).
Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T can synthesize mycosporines, the higher production was registered at 18 °C with light and without NaCl (6.9 ± 1.3 mg g−1), in this condition with NaCl, the accumulation was 75% lower (3.9 ± 0.06 mg g−1). A similar effect was observed when the strains were cultured in darkness. No MGG accumulation was observed when the growth temperature was set at 5 °C (Fig. 6).
Mrakia sp.
Finally, Mrakia sp. CRUB 1272 showed significantly higher growth at 5 °C without NaCl (μ: 0.03) (p < 0.05), at 5 °C with 5% NaCl (μ: 0.02) had a longer lag phase, at 18 °C with 5% NaCl the lag phase was longer and half of the biomass obtained at 5 °C with 5% NaCl was achieved (0.009 and 0.0144 g mL−1 respectively) (Fig. 2e).
Intracellular glycerol production was at its peak at 18 °C with 5% NaCl (422.6 ± 35.7 mg g−1). However, during this condition, the strain had the slowest rate of growth and biomass production. We also noticed extracellular glycerol production with and without NaCl at 18 °C (26.61 ± 0.18 mg g−1 and 18.8 ± 0.14 mg g−1 respectively) (Fig. 3). The highest production of trehalose was observed at 5 °C without NaCl (55.4 ± 10.9 mg g−1), but in other conditions, we observed significantly lower production of this metabolite (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). Ergosterol was notably higher at 18 °C with NaCl (9.5 ± 0.7 mg g−1), but there were no statistical differences (p < 0.05) observed for the remaining culture conditions (Fig. 5). No mycosporines were produced in any condition tested.
Discussion
In this study, we categorized 38 yeast strains found in extreme environments into five groups: osmotolerant, polyextremophilic, psychrotolerant, psychrophilic, and extreme psychrophilic. The three strains that were classified into the polyextremotolerants group (G1) were isolated from seawater in Antarctica and belong to different taxonomic groups Metschnikowia australis, Debaryomyces hansenii (Order: Saccharomycetales) and Vishniacozyma victoriae (Order: Tremellales). Generally, marine yeasts have developed a series of adaptive mechanisms that include the production of osmolyte compounds that allow them to survive in saline environments (Musa et al. 2018). The species in the G1 group have been previously described as ubiquitous (de Garcia et al. 2014), and it has been mentioned that their metabolic plasticity allows them to play an ecological central role in these extreme environments (Gostinčar et al. 2014; Buzzini et al. 2018; Touchette et al. 2023).
The 28 strains of group G2, presented a wide range of responses either to temperature or to osmotic conditions. The subgroup A was represented by yeasts of the Saccharomyces genus. Our results related to temperature profile coincide with the data obtained from different psychrotolerant species of the genus, which are capable of growing at low temperatures (8–15 °C) and have a maximum growth temperature in the range of 33–35 °C (Sampaio 2018). S. eubayanus and S. uvarun not only have diversity hotspots in common but also share an ecological association with Nothofagus spp. (Almeida et al. 2014; Eizaguirre et al. 2018). While S. eubayanus has been found in other regions (Peris et al. 2016; Sampaio 2022), the limited number of isolated strains and their lower genetic diversity indicate that the cold environment of South America serves as the leading center for their evolutionary radiation (Eizaguirre et al. 2018; Nespolo et al. 2020). In our results, native strains of Saccharomyces genus showed in its growing profile the adaptation to high sugar concentration and low temperatures, both characteristics of Nothofagus spp. forests and Cyttaria stromata, a fungus with a fructified body that can present up to 10% of w/v of simple sugars (Ulloa et al. 2009; Cadez et al. 2019). Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to osmotic stress and low temperatures shows a marked effect on the plasma membrane, the rigidity hinders the incorporation of soluble molecules, preventing the degradation and subsequent utilization of nutrients by the cell (Teixeira et al. 2011; Shokoohi et al. 2016). This could explain the low growth of Saccharomyces sp. strain under conditions that combine the effect of cold and osmotic stress.
On the other hand, all the genera included in subgroups B and C, Aureobasidium, Sampaiozyma, Tausonia, Vishniacozyma, Phaffia, Leucosporidium, Mrakia, and Glaciozyma, have been previously described as cold-adapted (Fell et al. 2011; Gostinčar et al. 2014; de Garcia et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015). The environments from which they were isolated include cold environments such as substrates associated with the Nothofagus spp. tree system (Sampaio and Goncalves, 2017), glacial meltwater (de Garcia et al. 2007, 2012), and Antarctic marine ice (de Garcia, data not shown). These species exhibit broad profiles and employ multiple strategies (cold-adapted enzymes, pigments production, polysaccharides production, etc.) to deal with high salinity and low-temperature conditions, they also constitute the dominant species in different cold environments around the world (Buzzini et al. 2018).
Finally, the extreme psychrophilic group (G3), consists entirely of a recently described species Cryolevonia giraudoae (de Garcia et al. 2020), a yeast species that shows an extreme profile and low capability to survive in a changing environment in terms of temperature and salinity. Highly specialized organisms with low phenotypic plasticity are highly adapted to very specific environmental conditions (Touchette et al. 2023). This means that they are unable to survive in other environments that differ significantly from their natural habitat. These organisms are among the most vulnerable in the context of climate change, so understanding them is important for the conservation of biodiversity, these point to the importance of studying the biodiversity of glacial ice and the preserved microbiota present on it (Rosa et al. 2019). However due to their very low phenotypic plasticity and their low growth rate we did not include this group in the typification of their biotechnological potential.
The study of the effect of saline and temperature in biomass and metabolites production in five different yeasts including Vishniacozyma victoriae CRUB 2064, Debaryomyces hansenii CRUB 2079; Saccharomyces eubayanus CRUB 1939, Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T; and Mrakia sp. CRUB 1272 showed that each strain exhibited a growth pattern consistent with its specific profile.
For the production of secondary metabolites, the accumulation of glycerol in V. victoriae, Phaffia tasmanica, S. eubayanus, and Mrakia sp. was the highest in the medium with 5% of NaCl. On the contrary, D. hansenii CRUB 2079 (polyextremotolerant) temperatures and salinity tested in this study did not affect final biomass production or glycerol accumulation, although temperature affected the growth rate. The production of glycerol in yeast is a very well-known mechanism for survival in extreme conditions mainly acting as a compatible solute against osmotic stress (Andreishcheva and Zvyagilskaya 1999). Although most of the works are centered on S. cerevisiae as a yeast model the role of glycerol in osmotolerance was observed for other yeasts, like D. hansenii (Andreishcheva and Zvyagilskaya 1999), this is the first report of glycerol accumulation for the other 3 species used in this work in at least one temperature condition, that not always is coincident with the best temperature observed for the growth. Pérez-Torrado et al. (2016) mention that Saccharomyces species show different strategies to survive under osmotic or cold-osmotic stressful conditions, where the balance of intracellular glycerol did not respond to one specific condition, which would indicate they are using different strategies to face environmental alterations. In this sense, our work contributes to establishing that intracellular glycerol concentration is probably a universal response among yeasts to cope with osmotic stress, although this response also depends on the culture temperature, and the best condition for each species is a priori unpredictable.
Surprisingly, D. hansenii is the only species used that did not show significant changes in glycerol accumulation. Khroustalyova et al (2001) showed that in this species there is a strong correlation between NaCl concentration and intracellular glycerol accumulation, and Prista et al (2005) demonstrated that this yeast possesses glycerol and sodium symport transporters to regulate the concentration of these solutes and ions in the intracellular medium in response to external osmotic pressure. Probably the osmotic conditions used in this work and the lack of extracellular glycerol in culture media, are related to the observation of the constant intracellular glycerol content, and the NaCl concentration, used in this study, that was selected to allow the growth of strains whose profiles were not necessarily halotolerant.
Regarding trehalose accumulation, we observed that strains S. eubayanus CRUB 1939 and Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T had a higher, in almost all tested conditions, compared to the other strains. It has been reported that trehalose is accumulated in yeasts that ferment sugars into ethanol, which provides protection against oxidative damage to proteins and lipids, extends lifespan, reduces generation of petites, and increases ethanol production (Eleutherio et al. 2015). Although the production of ethanol in P. tasmanica was not proved in this work, it is well established that crabtree and ethanol production occurs in the sister species P. rhodozyma (Reynders et al. 1997). On the other hand, trehalose acts as a protector in yeasts because it stabilizes the structure of the lipid bilayer and proteins, avoids protein aggregation, as well as prevents chemical changes in biomolecules (Feofliva et al., 2014; Jiang et al. 2018; Kosar et al. 2018). Based on these results could be interesting the use of Phaffia spp. or S. eubayanus for trehalose production. For the other species V. victoriae CRUB 2064, D. hansenii CRUB 2064, and Mrakia sp. CRUB 1272 trehalose accumulation was significantly higher at 5 °C without NaCl, several authors have mentioned that trehalose might have a protective role against the low temperatures stress but not at high NaCl concentration (Li et al. 2008; Tsuji 2016; Jiang et al. 2018). Our results are in agreement with those observations and suggest that for these species trehalose accumulation is probably a physiological adaptation for the growth at low temperatures.
When we analyze ergosterol accumulation, four of the studied strains have a basal production of this metabolite that increased under higher temperature and salinity culture conditions, ergosterol is a sterol molecule that is found in the cell membranes of fungi, including yeasts. This molecule plays an important role in maintaining the structural integrity and fluidity of the cell membrane, contributes to membrane rigidity and stability, and is involved in stress responses. Ergosterol has been found to have a protective role in yeasts against desiccation and osmotic stress (Dupont et al. 2011, 2012), these findings are consistent with the results obtained in this work. Moreover, Villareal et al. (2018), found similar results in Antarctic yeasts when cultures were grown at different temperatures, ergosterol production did not vary significantly, however, when NaCl was added ergosterol increased in the cell. Our work contributes to the hypothesis that ergosterol plays a protective role against desiccation and osmotic stress in different polyextremophilic yeasts (Dupont et al. 2011, 2012).
MGG is a species-specific trait in yeasts, therefore, its accumulation could only be detected in two of the five analyzed strains, V. victoriae CRUB 2064 and Phaffia tasmanica PYCC 6858 T (Moliné et al. 2014). In both strains, the higher production of this metabolite was observed in optimal conditions (with light and at 18 °C without NaCl), This finding would suggest that MGG does not have a role as an osmolyte as some authors had previously proposed for black fungi (Kogej et al. 2006) and is consistent with previous studies where the production of MGG in strains of Phaffia rhodozyma (Cystofilobasidiales) and Dioszegia sp. (Tremellales) decreased when NaCl was present in the culture medium (Moliné 2010; Moliné et al. 2014). Additionally, no accumulation of this metabolite was observed when cells grow at low temperatures indicating that this metabolite is not a response to resist cold shock in these species.
The production of metabolites upon stress in five strains of cold-adapted yeasts has shown us that the responses are not always universal, and although there are general tendencies, such as the greater accumulation of glycerol under osmotic stress, trehalose at low temperatures, ergosterol at high temperatures and salinity, and MGG under optimal growth conditions, these responses are not general and depend on the yeast strains. Thus, looking at the maximum biomass production under optimal growth conditions, it can be seen that the conditions associated with the highest metabolite production are under suboptimal conditions that trigger the production of stress-associated metabolites. To reconcile metabolite and biomass production, the study needs to be extended to other temperatures and salt concentrations, for example using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). This will make it possible to obtain results that can be used by the biotechnological industry.
This work contributes to the knowledge of non-conventional yeasts from cold environments, their growth profile, metabolites, and biomass production in different conditions. However, further studies with psychrophilic and extremotolerant yeasts are needed which will allow us to observe in more detail the effects of stress conditions on different metabolite production, especially those with application in different biotechnological processes.
Data Availability
Data will be available in https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/.
References
Alcaíno J, Cifuentes V, Baeza M (2015) Physiological adaptations of yeasts living in cold environments and their potential applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:1467–1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1900-8
Almeida P, Gonçalves C, Teixeira S et al (2014) A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat Commun 5:4044. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5044
Andreishcheva EN, Zvyagilskaya RA (1999) Adaptation of yeasts to salt stress. Appl Biochem Microbiol 35(3):217–228
Arroyo-López F N, Orlić S, Querol A, Barrio E (2009) Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol 131(2–3):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.035.
Buzzini P, Margesin R (2014) Cold-adapted yeasts, a lesson from the cold and a challenge for the XXI century. In: Buzzini P, Margesin R (eds) Cold-adapted yeast, biodiversity, adaptation strategies and biotechnological significance. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–148
Buzzini P, Branda E, Goretti M, Turchetti B (2012) Psychrophilic yeasts from worldwide glacial habitats, diversity, adaptation strategies and biotechnological potential. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82(2):217–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01348.x
Buzzini P, Turk M, Perini L, Turchetti B, Gunde-Cimerman N (2017) Yeasts in polar and subpolar habitats. In: Buzzini P, Lachance AM, Yurkov A (eds) Yeasts in natural ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–365
Buzzini P, Turchetti B, Yurkov A (2018) Extremophilic yeasts, the toughest yeasts around? Yeast 35(8):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3314
Čadež N, Bellora N, Ulloa R, Hittinger C T, Libkind D (2019) Genomic content of a novel yeast species Hanseniaspora gamundiae sp. nov. from fungal stromata (Cyttaria) associated with a unique fermented beverage in Andean Patagonia, Argentina. PLoS One, 14(1):e0210792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210792
Cantrell S (2017) Fungi in extreme and stressful environments. In: White JF, Dighton J (eds) The fungal community, its organization and role in the ecosystem, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 293–308
Cavicchioli R, Amlls R, Wagner D, McGently T (2011) Life and applications of extremophiles. Environ Microbiol 13(8):1903–1907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02512.x
Dakal TC, Solieri L, Giudici P (2014) Adaptive response and tolerance to sugar and salt stress in the food yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. Int J Food Microbiol 185:140–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.05.015
de Garcia V, Brizzio S, Libkind D, Buzzini P, Van Broock M (2007) Biodiversity of cold-adapted yeasts from glacial meltwater rivers in Patagonia. Argentina FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59(2):331–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00239.x
de Garcia V, Brizzio S, Broock MR (2012) Yeasts from glacial ice of Patagonian Andes. Argentina FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82(2):540–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01470.x
de Garcia V, Libkind D, Moliné M, Rosa CA, Giraudo MR (2014) Cold-adapted yeasts in Patagonian habitats. In: Buzzini P, Margesin R (eds) Cold-adapted yeasts. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–148
Dupont S, Beney L, Ferreira T (1808) Gervais P (2011) Nature of sterols affects plasma membrane behavior and yeast survival during dehydration. Biochim Biophys Acta 6:1520–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.012
Dupont S, Lemetais G, Ferreira T, Cayot P, Gervais P, Beney L (2012) Ergosterol biosynthesis, a fungal pathway for life on land? Int J Evol Biol 66(9):2961–2968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01667.x
Eizaguirre JI, Peris D, Rodríguez ME, Lopes CA, De Los RP, Hittinger CT, Libkind D (2018) Phylogeography of the wild Lager-brewing ancestor (Saccharomyces eubayanus) in Patagonia. Environ Microbiol 20(10):3732–3743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14375
Eleutherio E, Panek A, De Mesquita JF, Trevisol E, Magalhães R (2015) Revisiting yeast trehalose metabolism. Curr Genet 61(3):263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-014-0450-1
Fell J W (2011) Mrakia Y. Yamada and Komagata (1987). In: Kurtzman C, Fell J W, Boekhout T (Eds.) The yeasts, 5th Ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1503-1510.
Feofilova EP, Usov AI, Mysyakina IS, Kochkina GA (2014) Trehalose, chemical structure, biological functions, and practical application. Microbiol 83(3):184–194. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261714020064
Fraser T (2016) Osmotic stress survival and thermal tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J McPherson College Sci 24:13–16
Goordial J, Lamarche-Gagnon G, Lay CY, Whyte L (2013) Left out in the cold, life in cryoenvironments. In: Seckbach AO, Stan-Lotter H (eds) Polyextremophiles. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 335–363
Gostinčar C, Grube M, De Hoog S, Zalar P, Gunde-Cimerman N (2010) Extremotolerance in fungi, evolution on the edge. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00794.x
Gostinčar C, Ohm RA, Kogej T, Sonjak S, Turk M, Zajc J et al (2014) Genome sequencing of four Aureobasidium pullulans varieties, biotechnological potential, stress tolerance, and description of new species. BMC Genomics 15(1):549. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-549
Gostinčar C, Zajc J, Lenassi M, Plemenitas A, de Hoog S, Al-Hatmi AMS, Gunde-Cimerman N (2018) Fungi between extremotolerance and opportunistic pathogenicity on humans. Fungal Divers 93:195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0414-8
Gunde-Cimerman N, Sonjak S, Zalar P, Frisvad JC, Diderichsen B, Plemenitaš A (2003) Extremophilic fungi in arctic ice, a relationship between adaptation to low temperature and water activity. Phys Chem Earth Parts a/b/c 28:1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2003.08.056
Gustafsson L, Norkrans B (1976) On the mechanism of salt tolerance: production of glycerol and heat during growth of Debaryomyces hansenii. Arch Microbiol 110:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690226
Hodge JE (1962) Determination of reducing sugars and carbohydrates. Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 380–394
Ianutsevich EA, Danilova OA, Kurilov DV et al (2020) Osmolytes and membrane lipids in adaptive response of thermophilic fungus Rhizomucor miehei to cold, osmotic and oxidative shocks. Extremophiles 24:391–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-020-01163-3
Jiang H, Liu GL, Chi Z, Hu Z, Chi ZM (2018) Genetics of trehalose biosynthesis in desert-derived Aureobasidium melanogenum and role of trehalose in the adaptation of the yeast to extreme environments. Curr Genet 64(2):479–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0762-z
Khroustalyova G, Adler L, Rapoport A (2001) Exponential growth phase cells of the osmotolerant yeast Debaryomyces hansenii are extremely resistant to dehydration stress. Process Biochem 36:1163–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00148-0
Kogej T, Gostinčar C, Volkmann M, Gorbushina AA, Gunde-Cimerman N (2006) Mycosporines in extremophilic fungi – novel complementary osmolytes? Environ Chem 3(2):105–110. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN06012
Kosar F, Akram NA, Sadiq M et al (2019) Trehalose: A Key Organic Osmolyte Effectively Involved in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul 38:606–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9876-x
Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, Robert V (2011) Methods for the isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (eds) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 5th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–110
Li BQ, Tian SP (2006) Effects of trehalose on stress tolerance and biocontrol efficacy of Cryptococcus laurentii. J Appl Microbiol 100:854–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02852.x
Li BQ, Zhou ZW, Tian SP (2008) Combined effects of endo-and exogenous trehalose on stress tolerance and biocontrol efficacy of two antagonistic yeasts. Biol Control 46(2):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.04.011
Libkind D, Ruffini A, van Broock M, Alves L, Sampaio JP (2007) Biogeography, host specificity, and molecular phylogeny of the basidiomycetous yeast Phaffia rhodozyma and its sexual form. Xanthophyllomyces Dendrorhous Appl Environ Microbiol 73(4):1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01432-06
Libkind D, Moliné M, de Garcia V, Fontenla S, van Broock M (2008) Characterization of a novel South American population of the astaxanthin producing yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma). J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(3):151–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0275-8
Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, Gonçalves C, Dover J, Johnston M et al (2011a) Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. PNAS 108:14539–14544. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105430108
Libkind D, Moliné M, Sommaruga R, Sampaio JP, van Broock M (2011b) Phylogenetic distribution of fungal mycosporines within the Pucciniomycotina (Basidiomycota). Yeast 28(8):619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1891
Libkind D, Moliné M, van Brook M (2004) Posibles mecanismos de fotoprotección en levaduras. Rev electrón Radiobiol 4:84–88. http://www-rayos.medicina.uma.es/rmf/radiobiologia/revista/numeros/RB4(2004)84-88.pdf
Lingwood D, Simons K (2010) Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174621
Liu XZ, Wang QM, Göker M, Groenewald M, Kachalkin AV, Lumbsch HT et al (2015) Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes. Stud Mycol 81:85–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2015.12.001
Ma T, Cai H, Zong H, Lu X, Zhuge B (2023) Effects of trehalose and ergosterol on pinene stress of Candida glycerinogenes. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 70:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.2366open_in_ne
Margesin R, Miteva V (2011) Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms. Res Microbiol 162(3):346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2010.12.004
Moliné M, Libkind D, de Garcia V, Giraudo MR (2014) Production of pigments and photo-protective compounds by cold-adapted yeasts. In: Buzzini P, Margesin R (eds) Cold-adapted yeasts. Springer, Berlin, pp 123–148
Moliné M (2010) Producción de compuestos fotoprotectores (carotenoides y micosporinas) por levaduras. PhD thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán.
Moliné M, Arbeloa EM, Flores MR, Libkind D, Farías ME, Bertolotti SG, Churio MS, van Broock MR (2011) UVB photoprotective role of mycosporines in yeast: photostability and antioxidant activity of mycosporine-glutaminol-glucoside. Radiat Res 175:44–50
Musa H, Kasim FH, Gunny AAN, Gopinath SC (2018) Salt-adapted moulds and yeasts: potentials in industrial and environmental biotechnology. Process Biochem 69:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.03.026
Nespolo RF, Villarroel CA, Oporto CI, Tapia SM, Vega-Macaya F, Urbina K et al (2020) An Out-of-Patagonia migration explains the worldwide diversity and distribution of Saccharomyces eubayanus lineages. PLoS Genet 16(5):e1008777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008777
Olson JA, Knizley H Jr (1962) The effect of diphenylamine on carotenoid, sterol and fatty acid synthesis in Phycomyces blakesleeanus. Arch Biochem Biophys 97(1):138–145
Pajarola AL (2015) Tolerancia de Phaffia rhodozyma al estrés oxidativo. Thesis, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Carlos de Bariloche, Rol de las micosporinas y los carotenoides
Perez-Torrado R, Oliveira BM, Zemančíková J, Sychrova H, Querol A (2016) Alternative glycerol balance strategies among Saccharomyces species in response to winemaking stress. Front Microbiol 7:435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00435
Pérez-Torrado R, Oliveira BM, Zemančíková J, Sychrova H, Querol A (2016) Alternative glycerol balance strategies among Saccharomyces species in response to winemaking stress. Front Microbiol 7:435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00435
Peris D, Langdon QK, Moriarty RV, Sylvester K, Bontrager M, Charron G et al (2016) Complex ancestries of lager-brewing hybrids were shaped by standing variation in the wild yeast Saccharomyces eubayanus. PLoS Genet 12(7):e1006155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006155
Prista C, Loureiro-Dias MC, Montiel V, García R, Ramos J (2005) Mechanisms underlying the halotolerant way of Debaryomyces hansenii. FEMS Yeast Res 5(8):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.12.009
Reynders MB, Rawlings DE, Harrison STL (1997) Demonstration of the Crabtree effect in Phaffia rhodozyma during continuous and fed-batch cultivation. Biotechnol Lett 19:549–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018341421122
Rosa L H, Zani C L, Cantrell C L, Duke S O, Van Dijck P, Desideri A, Rosa C A (2019) Fungi in Antarctica: diversity, ecology, effects of climate change, and bioprospection for bioactive compounds. In: Rosa L (eds) Fungi of Antarctica. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18367-7_1
Sampaio JP (2018) Microbe profile: Saccharomyces eubayanus, the missing link to lager beer yeasts. Microbiology 164(9):1069. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000677
Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P (2017) Biogeography and Ecology of the Genus Saccharomyces. In: Buzzini P, Lachance MA, Yurkov A (eds) Yeasts in natural ecosystems: ecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61575-2_5
Semkiv M, Dmytruk K, Abbas C, Sibirny A (2017) Biotechnology of glycerol production and conversion in yeasts. In: Sibirny A (eds) Biotechnology of yeasts and filamentous fungi. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58829-2_5
Shaw WHC, Jefferies JP (1953) The determination of ergosterol in yeast, Part II. Determination by saponification and ultra-violet absorption spectroscopy. Analyst 78:514–519
Shokoohi S, Tsigounis K, Urmaza LM, Perez AZ (2016) The effect of stress due to sodium chloride exposure on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Expedition, 5. https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/expedition/article/view/188340
Song H, Jang SH, Park JM, Lee SY (2008) Modeling of batch fermentation kinetics for succinic acid production by Mannheimia succiniciproducens. Biochem Eng J 40:107–115
Suzuki M, Prasad G S, Kurtzman C P (2011) Debaryomyces Lodder kreger-van rij (1952) In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (Eds.) The yeasts, 5th Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 361-372.
Teixeira MC, Mira NP, Sá-Correia I (2011) A genome-wide perspective on the response and tolerance to food-relevant stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Biotech 22(2):150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.011
Thomas-Hall S R, Turchetti B, Buzzini P, Branda E, Boekhout T, et al (2010) Cold-adapted yeasts from Antarctica and the Italian Alps – description of three novel species, Mrakia robertii sp. nov., Mrakia blollopis sp. nov. and Mrakiella niccombsii sp. nov. Extremophiles, 14(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-009-0286-7
Touchette D, Maggiori C, Altshuler I, Tettenborn A, Bourdages LJ, Magnuson E, Blenner-Hassett O, Raymond-Bouchard I, Ellery A, Whyte LJ (2023) Microbial characterization of Arctic glacial ice cores with a semiautomated life detection system. Astrobiology 23(7):756–768. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2022.0130
Tsuji M (2016) Cold-stress responses in the Antarctic basidiomycetous yeast Mrakia blollopis. R Soc Open Sci 3(7):160106. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160106
Tsuji M, Fujiu S, Xiao N, Hanada Y, Kudoh S, Kondo H, Tsuda S, Hoshino T (2013) Cold adaptation of fungi obtained from soil and lake sediment in the Skarvsnes ice-free area. Antarctica FEMS Microbiol Lett 346(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12217
Tsuji M, Tanabe Y, Vincent W F, Uchida M (2018) Mrakia arctica sp. nov., a new psychrophilic yeast isolated from an ice island in the Canadian High Arctic. Mycoscience 59(1):54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2017.08.006
Turchetti B, Hall S R T, Connell L B, Branda E, Buzzini P, Theelen B, et al (2011) Psychrophilic yeasts from Antarctica and European glaciers, description of Glaciozyma gen. nov, Glaciozyma martinii sp. nov. and Glaciozyma watsonii sp. nov. Extremophiles 15(5):573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-011-0388-x
Ulloa J A, Libkind D, Fontenla SB, van Broock M (2009) Levaduras fermentadoras aisladas de Cyttaria hariotii (Fungi) en bosques Andino-Patagónicos (Argentina). Bol Soc Argent Bot 44:239–248. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1851-23722009000200002&script=sci_arttext
Villarreal P, Carrasco M, Barahona S et al (2018) Antarctic yeasts: analysis of their freeze-thaw tolerance and production of antifreeze proteins, fatty acids and ergosterol. BMC Microbiol 18:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1214-8
Vincent WF (2000) Evolutionary origins of Antarctic microbiota, invasion, selection and endemism. Antarct Sci 12:374–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102000000420
Wang Q-M, Yurkov AM, Göker M, Lumbsch HT, Leavitt SD, Groenewald M, Theelen B, Liu X-Z, Boekhout T, Bai F-Y. Multigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of yeasts and related fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina. Stud Mycol 81(1):149–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2015.12.002
Warnes G R, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw W H A, Lumley T, et al (2015) gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version 2.17. 0. Comput soft. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots
Yusof NA, Hashim NHF, Bharudin I (2021) Cold adaptation strategies and the potential of psychrophilic enzymes from the Antarctic yeast, Glaciozyma antarctica PI12. J Fungi 7(7):528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070528
Zwietering MH, Jongenburger I, Rombouts FM, Van’t Riet K, (1990) Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(6):1875–1881. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.6.1875-1881.1990
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by projects granted to DL: Universidad Nacional del Comahue (B199, B247), CONICET (PIP 11220200102948CO); to VdG: FONCyT (PICT 2014-2483) and to MM: PICT2016-0565); R. Duo Saito was supported by CONICET PhD fellowships and fellowship by Consejo Interuniversitario Nacional CIN-CRUB res. 0819.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Atomi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Duo Saito, R.A., Moliné, M. & de Garcia, V. Physiological characterization of polyextremotolerant yeasts from cold environments of Patagonia. Extremophiles 28, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-024-01334-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-024-01334-6