Abstract
An in-depth understanding of the development and distribution of laticifer (latex secretory structure) will be important for the production of both rubber and medicines and will support studies on plant adaptations to their environments. We characterize here and describe the ontogenesis of the laticifer sytem in Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae), an invasive subshrub species in arid landscapes. Anatomical and histochemical evaluations of the primary and secondary structures of the stem were carried out on a monthly basis during a full year, with ultrastructural evaluations of laticifer on the stem apex during the rainy season. In the primary structure, laticifer differentiate early from procambium and ground meristem cells of the cortex and medulla and become concentrated adjacent to the external and internal phloem of the bicollateral bundles. In the secondary structure, laticifer differentiates from fusiform derivative cells of the phloem close to the sieve-tube elements. The laticifer is of the articulated, anastomosing, branched type, and it originates from precursor cells that loose the transversal and longitudinal walls by dissolution. Latex is a mixture of terpenes, alkaloids, flavonoids, mucilage, and proteins. The apical meristem and vascular cambium where the laticifer system begins its development are active throughout the year, including during the dry season. The vascular cambium produces phloem with laticifer precursor cells during the rainy season, with high temperatures and long days. The ability of C. procera to grow under water deficit conditions and produce laticifer throughout the year contribute to its wide distribution in arid environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Latex is an emulsion formed by compounds produced by plant primary and secondary metabolism (Lopes et al. 2009; Ramos et al. 2019). It acts to prevent infections by microorganisms as well as herbivory and also aids in wound sealing—thus contributing to the adaptive success of plants (Agrawal and Konno 2009; Habib and Ismail 2021). Latex has historical importance in terms of rubber production as well as significant medicinal value (Al-Snafi 2015; Cavalcante et al. 2020, Naidoo et al. 2020). Laticifers are specialized tubular structures that occur in numerous plant organs and secrete latex (Teixeira et al. 2020). They generally originate in the procambium and the ground meristem of the cortex and medulla of the shoot apex (Gonçalves et al. 2018, Pirolla‑Souza et al. 2019) and usually from phloem-derived cells from the vascular cambium in the secondary structure of the stem (Gonçalves et al. 2018; Souza et al. 2021). Studies on the development and distribution of laticifers will be important for improving latex production and will contribute to the expansion of our knowledge concerning plant adaptations to different environments.
The Apocynaceae family comprises many latex-producing species, and the anastomosing structural type of laticifer is reported to be predominant in the group (Gama et al. 2017; Pirolla-Souza et al. 2019). Laticifers of this type are formed by rows of cells whose terminal and lateral walls are absorbed, forming elongated and branching ducts (Gonçalves et al. 2018; Souza et al. 2021). Ontogenetic studies that allow a complete definition of the anastomosis processes through dissolution of adjacent cell walls are required for the correct definition of their structural type (Gama et al. 2017; Gonçalves et al. 2018; Teixeira et al. 2020; Souza et al. 2021).
Laticifer differentiation in the secondary phloem is controlled by the cambium activity, which, in turn, is controlled by climatic conditions (Marcati et al. 2016; Almeida et al. 2019; Souza et al. 2021). Seasons are well-defined in the Brazilian Cerrado (neotropical savanna), one being dry and cold and the other rainy and hot (Alvares et al. 2014). Studies of the formation times of the laticifers of species that occur in dry environments can contribute to the sustainable harvesting of economically valuable latex (Souza et al. 2021).
Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T.Aiton (Apocynaceae) is an erect subshrub capable of growing and fruiting throughout the year (Almeida et al. 2019) native to the desert regions of Africa and Asia (Hassan et al. 2015). The species was originally introduced into Brazil for ornamental purposes but soon became invasive, as it is well-adapted to semiarid environments (Oliveira et al. 2009; Frosi et al. 2012; Sobrinho et al. 2013). Calotropis procera has medicinal value; can be used to obtain fibers, biofuels, and nanoparticles; and is employed in phytoremediation projects (Kaur et al 2021). The plant is rich in nutrients, which makes it a promising source of animal feed (Costa et al. 2009; Hassan et al. 2015), and produces an abundant white latex with medicinal uses (Freitas et al. 2011; Al-Snafi 2015; Cavalcante et al. 2020).
Considering the naturalization of C. procera, its potential economic use and wide distribution in semiarid regions of Brazil, we sought to describe laticifer ontogenesis and characterize their development in the stems of that species by addressing the following questions: (1) What is the distribution pattern of the laticifer system? (2) What is its structural type? (3) What is the composition of the latex? (4) How does climatic seasonality influence laticifer development?
Materials and methods
Climate data and plant material
The climate of the study region is tropical savanna with a dry season (type Aw, according to the Köppen classification; Koöppen 1936), which is characterized by strong climatic seasonality with well-defined seasons, being hot/rainy in the austral spring/summer, and cold/dry in autumn/winter (Alvares et al. 2014) . The average annual rainfall at the study site is 1086 mm, and the average annual temperature 24 °C (National Institute and Meteorology of Brazil (INMET) https://portal.inmet.gov.br/). The highest precipitation rate (between March 2020 and February 2021) occurred in March, the highest temperature in October, and the longest day length in December (Fig. 1a–b).
Plant material was obtained from 5 adult individuals occurring in a natural population in the Cerrado region of the municipality of Montes Claros, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Fig. 2a). Samples were collected on a monthly basis between March 2020 and February 2021 and consisted of shoot apexes approximately 3 mm long (Fig. 2b) as well as fragments of the basal region of stem (approximately 4 cm in diameter) containing tissues external to the vascular cambium (Fig. 2c).
Structural analyses and histochemistry
The samples were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution (Karnovisky 1965), under vacuum (560 mm Hg) for 24 h, dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series (Jensen 1962), embedded in glycol-methacrylate resin (Leica Microsystem Inc., Heidenbeg, Germany), and sectioned using a rotary microtome (Atako, Tokyo, Japan). Transverse and longitudinal Sects. (5 µm thick) were stained with toluidine blue pH 4.7 (modified from O'Brien et al. 1964) and mounted on permanent slides using acrylic resin (Itacril, Itaquaquecetuba, Brazil).
Histochemical tests were performed to detect: terpenes using dimethyl-para-phenylenediamine hydrochloride (David and Carde 1964); alkaloids using Lugol’s reagent (Jensen 1962); phenolic compounds using toluidine blue, pH 4.7 (modified from O'Brien et al. 1964); flavonoids using p-dimethyl amino cinnamaldehyde (Feucht et al. 1986); acidic polysaccharides using toluidine blue, pH 4.7 (modified from O'Brien et al. 1964) and ruthenium red (Johansen 1940); and proteins using Xylidine-Ponceau (Vidal 1970). Photographic documentation was performed using an Axio Cam ICC3 digital camera coupled to an A1 Lab optical microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), under white and ultraviolet light with 505–530 nm filters.
Ultrastructural analyses
Ultrastructural analyses were performed on samples of the stem apical meristem undergoing vegetative growth (collected in November 2020, when rainfall, temperature, and day length values were high). Those samples were fixed in Karnovsky’s solution (Karnovisky 1965) under vacuum (560 mm Hg) for 3 min, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2), dehydrated in an increasing acetone series, and infiltrated with Araldite resin (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany). Ultrathin Sects. (50 nm thick) were obtained using a UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany), counterstained in a saturated solution of uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Roland 1978), and examined using a CM 100 transmission electron microscope (Philips/ FEI Corporation, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at 80 kV.
Results
Distribution, ontogenesis, and histochemistry
In the primary structure of the plant body, the laticifer system is distributed in the cortex and medulla, concentrated close to the phloem and including in regions between the outer and inner phloem strands of the bicollateral bundles (Fig. 3a–f). Laticifer development starts early in the promeristem of the shoot apex. The apex has well-defined nodes and internodes, and colleters in the axilla of the leaf primordia. Laticifers are not observed within the colleters (Fig. 4a). Laticifer system differentiate from the ground meristem of the cortex and medulla being thick, longitudinally elongated, and branched (Fig. 4a–d, 5a–b). Laticifers have only a thin cytoplasm compressed against the cell walls, with latex accumulated in a voluminous central vacuole (Fig. 5c–d). Their structural type is the branched anastomosing, originating from the partial dissolution of the transverse and lateral walls of the precursor cells (Fig. 6a–d).
During ontogenesis of the laticiferous ducts, the precursor cells have a voluminous nucleus and nucleolus and a dense cytoplasm rich in organelles responsible for the synthesis of latex components (Fig. 7a–b). Anastomosis processes begin early, and the walls dissolve centrifugally in regions crossed by numerous plasmodesmata (Fig. 7a–d). The partial collapse of the cytoplasm gives rise to membrane recycling vacuoles and organelle residues, which integrate into the latex (Fig. 8a–b). Latex accumulates in a voluminous central vacuole, with only a thin peripheral layer of cytoplasm compressed against the cell wall (Fig. 8c–d, Fig. 5c–d).
In the secondary structure of the developing stem, a thick cork, the absence of a phelloderm, and the presence of cortex containing laticifer are observed (Fig. 9a–b). Laticifer system is distributed in the secondary phloem among the axial parenchymal elements associated with sieve tube elements and companion cells (Fig. 9b–d). The rays are uni- or biseriate, with cells containing crystals, without the recorded occurrence of laticifer (Fig. 9d). During the ontogenesis of the laticifer, increases in both their lengths and calibers are observed due to the dissolution of the transverse and longitudinal walls of the fusiform cambium derivatives, leading to the formation of the anastomosing laticifer (Fig. 10a–d).
Histochemical tests evidenced that the latex is an emulsion containing lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds from secondary and primary metabolism. The main classes of compounds recorded were terpenes (Fig. 11a–b), alkaloids (Fig. 11c–d), flavonoids (Fig. 11e–f), mucilage (Fig. 11g–h), and proteins (Fig. 11i–j).
Climatic seasonality
Cambial activity remains uninterrupted throughout the year. Phloem is produced when rainfall, temperature, and photoperiod are all increasing (between October and March) during the rainy season, and laticifers develop during that period (Fig. 12a–d). Xylem production occurs in the months when these climatic parameters are decreasing (between the months of April and September) during the dry season (Fig. 12e–f), and no laticifers are observed in the xylem.
Discussion
Laticifer distribution in primary and secondary structures of the plant body
In C. procera the presence of laticifer is recorded in the cortex, pith, and between the outer and inner phloem strands of the bicollateral bundles of the stems. In Allamanda blanchetii (Gama et al. 2017), laticifer was recorded in the cortex and medulla and in the inner primary phloem. Pro-cambial origins were recorded in Tabernaemontana catharinensis (Canaveze and Machado 2016), and Vallaris solanaceae (Gondaliya and Rajput 2016). These differences in origin of the laticifer could constitute a taxonomic marker for groups of closely related species. However careful evaluations starting at the beginning of their development are necessary in order to correctly delimit laticifer distributions in the stem primary structure, in light of their close association with the phloem when they originate in the ground meristem. The occurrence of laticifers within colleters has not been observed in C. procera, but was reported in both Mandevilla illustris (Appezzato-Da-Glória and Estelita 2000) and A. cathartica (Thomas and Dave 1989). Colleters are secretory structures found in the axils of expanding leaves whose secretions are capable of protecting the leaf primordia and apical meristem against dehydration, herbivores, and pathogens (Mercadante-Simões and Paiva 2013). The presence of laticifer in primary stem tissues is related to the protection of the shoot apex against biotic components of the environment (as observed in the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis [Euphorbiaceae]) (Tan et al. 2017).
Laticifer originating from cambial fusiform derivatives cells, recorded in C. procera, was likewise observed in the stems of V. solanaceae (Gondaliya and Rajput 2016) and Tabernaemontana catharinensis (Canaveze and Machado 2016), as well as in the roots of M. atroviolacea (Lopes et al. 2009), and we point out that there are few studies on the presence of laticifer in the secondary body of Apocynaceae plants. The axial distribution of laticifers in secondary phloem gives rise to specific organizational patterns in relation to other cellular elements of that tissue. Laticifer of H. speciosa are randomly distributed throughout the phloem (Souza et al. 2021), but organized in axial concentric layers in the rubber tree H. brasiliensis (Tan et al. 2017; Nicole et al. 1991); in Swartzia (Fabaceae), they are positioned in groups of tangential bands (Oliveira et al, 2021a, b). Laticifers may also be present in the rays, as in V. solanacea (Gondaliya and Rajput 2016). The radial parenchyma behaves as a repair system in case of any interruptions of axial flow caused by biotic or abiotic factors (Prado and Demarco 2018). Laticifer has also been observed in the inner intra-xylem secondary phloem, originating from the bidirectional activity of the inner cambium of the bicollateral bundles (Gondaliya and Rajput 2016). The association of the laticifer with the phloem provides plant sap for the intense biosynthetic demands of these secretory structures for latex synthesis (Prado and Demarco 2018).
Structural type
The laticifer present in the cortex, pith, and secondary phloem of C. procera is of the anastomosing type. Transverse anastomosis (the fusion of longitudinally adjacent cells) results in the elongation of the laticifer, and the fusion of laterally adjacent cells gives rise to ramifications in the primary structure (Gonçalves et al 2018). In the secondary structure, the fusion of laterally adjacent cells increases the caliber of the laticifer (Souza et al 2021). The structural type of laticifer can often constitute taxonomic characters (Ramos et al. 2019; Pirolla-Souza et al. 2019; Leme et al. 2020; Medina et al. 2021; Teixeira et al. 2020). However, different types of laticifer can be observed in the same species (Teixeira et al. 2020). The structural type already described must be treated with care, as those classifications must be based on ontogenetic studies (Lopes et al. 2009; Gama et al. 2017; Gonçalves et al. 2018; Teixeira et al. 2020; Souza et al. 2021).
An anastomosing structural type appears to be the most frequent in most Apocynaceae species and in the most of the families studied until now. The laticifers of that group are formed by the rapid and early dissolution of the cell walls of stem apical meristem precursors through the centrifugal dissolution of the cell walls and the formation of a central lytic vacuole that contains part of the cytoplasm as well as previously synthesized latex, as described for H. speciosa (Gonçalves et al. 2018; Souza et al. 2021), A. blanchetii (Gama et al. 2017), and Rhabdadenia (Prolla-Souza et al. 2019). Transverse and longitudinal anastomosis of the fusiform cambial derivatives (the precursors of the laticifer) was observed in H. speciosa (Souza et al. 2021) and is very similar to that described here for C. procera.
Latex composition and laticifer development
The economic potential of latex is well known, especially in terms of the production of morphine from the poppy Papaver somniferum (Papaveraceae) (Labanca et al 2018) and natural rubber from H. brasiliensis trees (Habib and Ismail 2021). Our results indicate that the latex of C. procera is composed of a mixture of terpenes, alkaloids, flavonoids, mucilage, and proteins. Earlier studies evidenced that the chemical constituents of C. procera latex like steroids, glycosides, flavonoids, alkaloids, and saponins offer promise for the development of new therapeutic drugs in light of their high effectiveness and low LD50 (Al-Snafi 2015; Kaur et al 2021). Antitumor (Viana et al. 2017), antimicrobial (Tavares et al. 2021), and antiparasitic (Cavalcante et al. 2020) properties of fractions of C. procera latex have been reported. The latex is also associated with ecological functions of plant protection against herbivory (Agrawal and Konno 2009; Ramos et al. 2019) and controlling phytopathogens (Freitas et al. 2011, 2020; Kaur et al. 2021).
Calotropis procera is an evergreen species that grows throughout the year (Almeida et al. 2019) and continually produces latex in laticifer that develop in the apical meristem. While its cambial activity remains uninterrupted, it produces phloem and laticifer only during the rainy and hot spring/summer season. C. procera has ecophysiological attributes that allow positive water use dynamics, which has resulted in its becoming an invasive species in the semiarid regions of Brazil (Oliveira et al. 2009; Frosi et al. 2012; Sobrinho et al. 2013). The native species in those environments demonstrated distinct behavioral from C. procera, evidencing a period of vascular cambium dormancy—but reactivation in response to increasing day length, temperature, and rainfall during the rainy/cold season (Marcati et al. 2016; Souza et al. 2021). In the Cerrado, most species show vegetative growth in the transition from the dry to the rainy season, demonstrating an adaptation to maximize the use of water and nutrients (Novaes et al. 2020; Oliveira et al. 2021a, b; Pereira et al. 2022). The distinct behavior of C. procera from the other species of the Cerrado can be useful for defining strategies for the commercial exploitation of C. procera latex.
Conclusion
The laticifer present in the primary structure of C. procera stems originates from the procambium and ground meristem of the cortex and medulla and differentiates from the phloem fusiform derivative cells in secondary stem structures. Careful evaluations starting at the beginning of their development are necessary in order to correctly delimit laticifer distributions in the stem primary structure, in light of their close association with the phloem when they originate in the ground meristem. The structural type of laticifer (in both primary and secondary stem structures) is the anastomosing, and it increases in lengths and calibers and ramifies through the dissolution of the transversal and longitudinal walls of the precursor cells. The ontogeny of laticifers in the secondary phloem, derived from cambial activity, has been little studied, however, constituting a gap in our knowledge concerning laticifer. The latex from C. procera is related to its deterrent actions against herbivores and pathogens and can provides raw materials for the production of useful drugs. The synthesis is uninterrupted in the apical meristem and occurs only in the wet/hot season in the secondary phloem. The vegetative growth, without a resting phase in the dry/cold season, typical of cerrado plants, gives C. procera some advantages in terms of obtaining latex for commercial purposes.
References
Agrawal AA, Konno K (2009) Latex: a model for understanding mechanisms, ecology, and evolution of plant defense against herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol 40:311–331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120307
Almeida IVBD, Rêgo MM, Batista FRDC, Rêgo ER, Bruno RDLA (2019) Phenology of Calotropis procera (Ait.) WT Aiton accessions based on morphophysiological characteristics. RC 32:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252019v32n227rc
Al-Snafi AE (2015) The constituents and pharmacological properties of Calotropis procera- an overview. Int J Pharm Rev Res 5:259–275
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelha PC, Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G (2014) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z 22:711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Appezzato-Da-Glória B, Estelita MEM (2000) Development, structure and distribution of colleters in Mandevilla illustris and M. velutina (Apocynaceae). Braz J Bot 23:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042000000200001
Canaveze Y, Machado SR (2016) The occurrence of intrusive growth associated with articuled laticifers in Tabernaemontana catharinensis A.DC.A new record for Apocynaceae. Int J Plant Sci 177:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/685446
Cavalcante GS, Morais SM, André WPP, Araújo-Filho JV, Muniz CR, Rocha LO et al (2020) Chemical constituents of Calotropis procera latex and ultrastructural effects on Haemonchus contortus. Braz J Vet Parasitol 29:e001320. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612020045
Costa RG, Medeiros AN, Alves AR, Medeiros GR (2009) Perspectivas de utilização da flor-de-seda (Calotropis procera) na produção animal. Rev Caat 22:276–285. http://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/sistema. Accessed 02 Feb 2022
David R, Carde JP (1964) Coloration différentielle dês inclusions lipidique et terpéniques des pseudophylles du pine maritime au moyen du réactif Nadi. CR Acad Sci Paris, 375 Série D. 258:1338–1340
Feucht W, Schmid PPS, Christ E (1986) Distribution of flavonols in meristematic and mature tissues of Prunus avium shoots. J Plant Physiol 125:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(86)80237-1
Freitas CDT, Sousa Nogueira FC, Vasconcelos IM, Oliveira JTA, Domont GB, Ramos MV (2011) Osmotin purified from the latex of Calotropis procera: Biochemical characterization, biological activity and role in plant defense. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:738–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.027
Freitas CDT, Silva RO, Ramos MV, Porfírio CTMN, Farias DF, Sousa JS, Oliveira JPB, Souza PFN, Dias LP, Grangeiro TB (2020) Identification, characterization, and antifungal activity of cysteine peptidases from Calotropis procera latex. Phytochemistry 169:112163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112163
Frosi G, Oliveira MT, Cortez-Almeida J, Santos MG (2012) Ecophysiological performance of Calotropis procera: an exotic and evergreen species in Caatinga, Brazilian semi-arid. Acta Physiol Plant 35:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1076-x
Gama TSS, Rubiano VS, Demarco D (2017) Laticifer development and its growth mode in Allamanda blanchetii ADC. (Apocynaceae). J Torrey Bot Soc 144:303–312. https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-16-00050
Gondaliya A, Rajput KS (2016) Stem anatomy and development of intraxylary phloem in Vallaris solanacea (Roth) Kuntze (Apocynaceae). J Indian Bot Soc 95:202–215
Gonçalves MP, Mercadante-Simões MO, Ribeiro LM (2018) Ontogeny of anastomosing laticifers in the stem apex of Hancornia speciosa (Apocynaceae): a topographic approach. Protoplasma 255:1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1262-9
Habib MAH, Ismail MZ (2021) Hevea brasiliensis latex proteomics: a review of analytical methods and the way forward. J Plant Res 134:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-020-01231-x
Hassan LM, Galal TM, Farahat EA, El-Midany MM (2015) The biology of Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Trees 29:311–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1158-7
Jensen WA (1962) Botanical histochemistry, principles and practice. W.H. Freeman and Co., London
Johansen DA (1940) Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book, New York
Karnovisky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Bio 27:137–138
Kaur A, Batish DR, Kaur S, Chauhan BS (2021) An overview of the characteristics and potential of Calotropis procera from botanical, ecological, and economic perspectives. Front Plant Sci 12:690806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.690806
Koppen W (1936) Das geographische system der klimate. In: Köppen WR, Geiger (eds) Handbuch der klimatologie. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin, 1: pp 1–44, part C
Labanca F, Ovesnà J, Milella L (2018) Papaver somniferum L. taxonomy, uses and new insight in poppy alkaloid pathways. Phytochem Rev 17:853–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-018-9563-3
Leme FM, Borella PH, Marinho CR, Teixeira SP (2020) Expanding the laticifer knowledge in Cannabaceae: distribution, morphology, origin, and latex composition. Protoplasma 257:1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-020-01500-5
Lopes KLB, Thadeo M, Azevedo AA, Soares AA, Meira RMSA (2009) Articulated laticifers in the vegetative organs of Mandevilla atroviolacea (Apocynaceae, Apocynoideae). Can J Bot 87:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1139/B08-126
Marcati CR, Machado SR, Podadera DS, de Lara NOT, Bosio F, Wiedenhoeft AC (2016) Cambial activity in dry and rainy season on branches from wood species growing in Brazilian Cerrado. Flora 223:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2016.04.008
Medina MC, Sousa-Baena MS, Prado E et al (2021) Laticifers in Sapindaceae: structure, evolution and phylogenetic importance. Front Plant Sci 11:612985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.612985
Mercadante-Simões MO, Paiva EP (2013) Leaf colleters in Tontelea micrantha (Celastraceae, Salacioideae): ecological, morphological and structural aspects. CR Biol 336:400–406
Naidoo C, Naidoo Y, Dewir YH (2020) The secretory apparatus of Tabernaemontana ventricosa Hochst. ex A. DC. (Apocynaceae): Laticifer identification, characterization and distribution. Plants 9:686. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060686
Nicole M, Thouvenel JC, Giannotti J, Chrestin H, Geiger JP, Nandris D, Rio B (1991) The histology of Hevea brasiliensis phloem necrosis. For Path 21:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1991.tb00299.x
Novaes LR, Calixto ES, Oliveira ML, Lima LA, Almeida O, Torezan-Silingardi HM (2020) Environmental variables drive phenological events of anemocoric plants and enhance diaspore dispersal potential: A new wind-based approach. Sci Total Environ 730:139039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139039
O’Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME (1964) Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma 59:368–373
Oliveira CA, Mansano VF, Teixeira SP, Brandes AFN, Baratto LC, Leitão SG, Santana MN, Rodrigues IA, Paulino JV (2021a) Bloodwood: the composition and secreting-site of the characteristic red exudate that gives the name to the Swartzia species (Fabaceae). J Plant Res 134:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-020-01246-4
Oliveira CS, Messeder JVS, Teixido AL, Arantes MRR, Silveira FAO (2021b) Vegetative and reproductive phenology in a tropical grassland-savanna-forest gradiente. J Veg Sci 32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12997
Oliveira SHF, Negreiros D, Fernandes GW, Barbosa NPU, Rocha R, Almeida-Cortez JS (2009) Seedling growth of the invader Calotropis procera in ironstone rupestrian field and seasonally dry forest soils. Neotrop Biol Conserv 4:69–76. https://doi.org/10.4013/5117
Pereira CC, Boaventura MG, Cornelissen T, Nunes YRF, Castro GC (2022) What triggers phenological events in plants under seasonal environments? A study with phylogenetically related plant species in sympatry. Braz J Biol 84:e257969. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.257969
Pirolla-Souza A, Arruda ORC, Pace MR, Farinaccio MA (2019) Leaf anatomical characters of Rhabdadenia (Rhabdadenieae, Apocynaceae), their taxonomic implications, and notes on the presence of articulated laticifers in the genus. Plant Syst Evol 305:797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-019-01608-z
Prado E, Demarco D (2018) Laticifers and secretory ducts: similarities and differences. In: Hufnagel L (ed) Ecosystem Services and Global Ecology. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75705
Ramos MV, Demarco DCS, Freitas IC, Teixeira CD (2019) Laticifers, látex and their role in plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.03.006
Roland AM (1978) General preparations and staining of thin sections. In: Hall JL (ed) Electron microscopy and cytochemistry of plant cells. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–62
Sobrinho MS, Tabatinga GM, Machado IC, Lopes AV (2013) Reproductive phenological pattern of Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae), an invasive species in Brazil: annual in native areas; continuous in invaded areas of caatinga. Acta Bot Bras 27:456–459. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062013000200018
Souza AIRC, Castro KR, Gonçalves MP, Ribeiro LM, Mercadante-Simões MO (2021) The development of anastomosing laticifers in the stem apical meristema and vascular cambium of Hancornia speciosa (Apocynaceae) is related to climatic seasonality. Trees. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02118-7
Tan D, Hu X, Fu L, Kumpeangkeaw A, Ding Z, Sun X, Zhang J (2017) Comparative morphology and transcriptome analysis reveals distinct functions of the primary and secondary laticifer cells in the rubber tree. Sci Rep 7:3126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03083-3
Tavares LS, Ralph MT, Batista JEC et al (2021) Perspectives for the use of latex peptidases from Calotropis procera for control of inflammation derived from Salmonella infections. Int J Biol Macromol 171:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.172
Teixeira SP, Marinho CR, Leme FM (2020) Structural diversity and distribution of laticifers. Adv Bot Res 93:27–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2019.09.003
Thomas V, Dave Y (1989) Histochemistry and senescence of colleters of Allamanda cathartica (Apocynaceae). Ann Bot 64:201–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087826
Viana CA, Ramos MV, Marinho-Filho JDB, Lotufo LVC, Figueiredo IST, Oliveira JS, Mastroeni P, Lima-Filho JV, Alencar NMN (2017) Cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines and anti-inflammatory properties of chitinases from Calotropis procera latex. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 390:1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-017-1397-9
Vidal BC (1970) Dichroism in collagen bundles stained with Xylidine-Ponceau 2R. Ann Histochim 15:289–296
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Centro de Microscopia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (CM/UFMG) for the ultrastructural analyses.
Funding
The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (CRA-APQ-00468–15, CRA-PPM-00539–18, CRA-PPM-00544–18); the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (441440/2016–9, 441583/2020–2 – Long-term Ecological Research Network—PELD-VERE; APQ—303806/2019–2) for funding and for the Research Productivity Grants awarded to MO Mercadante-Simões (423340/2018–2) and LM Ribeiro (308337/2021–2); and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (88887.601422/2021–00) for Master’s Scholarship awarded to BMC Salomé.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MO Mercadante-Simões conceived and designed the research and performed the ultrastructural analyses. LM Ribeiro analyzed the quantitative data. BMCS and AFS performed the anatomical, histochemical, morphometric, and micromorphometric analyses. IFPA performed the field work. All authors contributed to writing the text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Alexander Schulz.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salomé, B.M.C., Santos, A.F., Ribeiro, L.M. et al. Anastomosing laticifer in the primary and secondary structures of Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T.Aiton (Apocynaceae) stems. Protoplasma 260, 497–508 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01792-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01792-9