Abstract
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. In this paper, we study derivations on the Banach algebra \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). We prove that any derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) maps it into its radical and a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is continuous if and only if its restriction to the right annihilator of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is continuous. We also show that the composition of two derivations on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is always a derivation on it and the zero map is the only centralizing derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Finally, we characterize the space of inner derivations of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and show that G is discrete if and only if there exist \(i, j, k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that \([d(m), n]_i^j=[m, n]_k\) for all \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\); or equivalently, any inner derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is zero.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let G be a locally compact abelian group with a fixed left Haar measure and let \(L^1(G)\) be the group algebra of G defined as in [4] equipped with the convolution product \(*\) and the norm \(\Vert .\Vert _1\). We denote by \(L_0^\infty (G)\) the subspace of all functions \(f\in L^\infty (G)\), the usual Lebesgue space as defined in [4] equipped with the essential supremum norm \(\Vert .\Vert _\infty \), that for each \(\varepsilon > 0\), there is a compact subset K of G for which
where \(\chi _{G\setminus K}\) denotes the characteristic function \(G\setminus K\) on G. It is well-known from [6] that the subspace \(L_0^\infty (G)\) is a topologically introverted subspace of \(L^\infty (G)\), that is, for each \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(f\in L_0^\infty (G)\), the function \(nf\in L_0^\infty (G)\), where
for all \(\phi , \psi \in L^1(G)\). Hence \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is a Banach algebra with the first Arens product “\(\cdot \)” defined by the formula
for all \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(f\in L_0^\infty (G)\). Note that \(L^1(G)\) may be regarded as a subspace of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and then \(L^1(G)\) is a closed ideal in \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) with a bounded approximate identity [6]. Let \(\Lambda _0(G)\) denote the set of all weak\(^*\)-cluster points of an approximate identity in \(L^1(G)\) bounded by one. It is easy to see that if \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\), then for every \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(\phi \in L^1(G)\)
Let \(\pi \) denote the natural continuous operator that associates to any functional in \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) its restriction to \(C_0(G)\), the space of all continuous functions on G vanishing at infinity. Then the restriction map \(\pi \) from \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) into M(G), the measure algebra of G as defined in [4] endowed with the convolution product \(*\) and the total variation norm, is a homomorphism and
is an isomorphism for all \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\). Note that, for every \(f\in L_0^\infty (G)\) and \(\phi \in L^1(G)\), we have \(f\phi \in C_0(G)\). Hence for every \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(f\in L_0^\infty (G)\), we may define the function \(\pi (n)f\in L^\infty (G)\) by
Then
This enable us to define the functional \(m\cdot \pi (n)\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) by
It follows that
for all \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\); see [6]. Let \(\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) denote the right annihilator of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\); i.e. the set of all \(r\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that \(m\cdot r=0\) for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). one can easily prove that
Furthermore, an easy application of the Hahn-Banach theorem shows that G is discrete if and only if
Let \(\mathfrak {A}\) be a Banach algebra; a linear mapping \(d: \mathfrak {A}\rightarrow \mathfrak {A}\) is called a derivation if
A fundamental question for derivations concerns their image. Singer and Wermer [12] showed that the range of a continuous derivation on a commutative Banach algebra is contained in the radical of algebra. They conjectured that this result holds for discontinuous derivations. Thomas [13] proved this conjecture. Posner [10] gave a noncommutative version of the Singer-Wermer theorem for prime rings. He proved that the zero map is the only centralizing derivation on a noncommutative prime ring (Posner’s second theorem). These results have been extended in various directions by several authors; see for instance [1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 14].
Can we apply the well-known results concerning derivations of commutative Banach algebras and derivations of prime rings to \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\)? This question seems natural, because \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is neither a commutative Banach algebra nor a prime ring, when G is a non-discrete group. In this paper, we investigate the truth of these results for \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
This paper is organized as follows: In Sect. 2, we investigate the Singer- Wermer conjecture and automatic continuity for \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). We prove that the range of a derivation on the noncommutative Banach algebra \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is contained in the radical of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is continuous if and only if its restriction to \(\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) is continuous. In Sect. 3, we investigate Posner’s second theorem and show that the zero map is the only centralizing derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). In Sect. 4, we characterize the space of all inner derivations of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and prove that G is discrete if and only if any inner derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is zero.
2 The Singer-Wermer conjecture for \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\)
We commence this section with the following result.
Theorem 1
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and d be a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Then d has its image in the right annihilator of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Proof
Let \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\). Define the function \(D: M(G)\rightarrow M(G)\) by
where \(\tilde{d}=d|_{u\cdot L_0^\infty (G)^*}\). It is routine to check that D is derivation on the commutative semisimple Banach algebra M(G). Hence D is zero. It follows that
Since \(\pi _u\) maps \(u\cdot L_0^\infty (G)^*\) onto M(G), we have
On the one hand,
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(r\in \hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\). So
Now, we only need to recall that \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is the Banach space direct sum of \(u\cdot L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\). \(\square \)
Before we give the following consequence of Theorem 1, let us recall that a linear mapping T on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is called spectrally bounded if there is a non-negative number \(\alpha \) such that \(r(T(m))\le \alpha r(m)\) for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\), where \(r(\cdot )\) stands for the spectral radius.
Corollary 1
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then the following statements hold.
-
(i)
Every derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) maps it into its radical.
-
(ii)
Primitive ideals of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) are invariant under derivations on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
-
(iii)
Every derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is spectrally bounded.
-
(iv)
The composition of two derivations on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is always a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Proof
The statement (i) follows from Theorem 1 together with the fact that the set of nilpotent elements is contained in the radical of the algebra. The statement (ii) follows immediately from (i). For (iii), note that if d is a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\), then
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(i\ge 2\). Finally, the statement (iv) follows from Theorem 1. \(\square \)
As an another consequence of Theorem 1, we have the following result.
Corollary 2
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then the following statements hold.
-
(i)
If d is a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\), then \(d|_{L^1(G)}\) is zero.
-
(ii)
The zero map is the only \(\hbox {weak}^{*}-\hbox {weak}^{*}\) continuous derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Proof
First note that
for all \(r\in \hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) and \(\phi \in L^1(G)\). So if d is a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\), then
for all \(\phi _1,\phi _2\in L^1(G)\). In view of Cohen’s factorization theorem, \(d=0\) on \(L^1(G)\). So (i) holds. The statement (ii) follows from Goldstein’s theorem (see e.g. [2, chapter 5, Proposition 4.1]) and (i). \(\square \)
Theorem 2
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and d be a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Then the following statements hold.
-
(i)
For every \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\), \(d|_{u\cdot L_0^\infty (G)^*}\) is always continuous.
-
(ii)
d is continuous if and only if \(d|_{\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)}\) is continuous.
Proof
(i) Let \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\) and \((u\cdot m_\alpha )_{\alpha \in A}\) be a net in \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that \(u\cdot m_\alpha \rightarrow 0\). It follows from Theorem 1 that
for all \(\alpha \in A\). Hence \(d(u\cdot m_\alpha )\rightarrow 0\). This shows that \(d|_{u\cdot L_0^\infty (G)^*}\) is continuous. (ii) Let \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\). Then \(m-u\cdot m\) is an element of \(\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\). If \(d|_{\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)}\) is continuous, then for some \(\alpha >0\)
By (i) there exists \(\beta >0\) such that
Thus
It follows that d is continuous. \(\square \)
Our last result of this section is an immediate consequence of Theorem 2(ii).
Corollary 3
Let G be a discrete abelian locally compact group.Then every derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is continuous.
3 Posner’s second theorem for \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\)
Let \(\hbox {Z} (L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) denote the center of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\); that is, the set of all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that \(m\cdot n=n\cdot m\) for all \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Proposition 1
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then
Proof
Let \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\). Since \(L^1(G)\) is an ideal in \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(\pi \) is identity on \(L^1(G)\), we have
for all \(\phi \in L^1(G)\) and \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). So \(L^1(G)\) is contained in \(\hbox {Z}(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\). For \(m\in \hbox {Z}(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\), we have
This shows that
Hence \(\hbox {Z} (L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) is contained in \(L^1(G)\); see Theorem 2.11 of [6]. \(\square \)
For any positive integer k, a mapping \(T: L_0^\infty (G)^*\rightarrow L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is called k -centralizing if
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\); in a special case when \([T(m),m^k]=0\) for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\), T is called k-commuting, where \([m,n]:=m\cdot n-n\cdot m\) for all \(m,n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Theorem 3
Let G be a locally compact abelian group, d be a derivation on \( L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and k be a positive integer. Then the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(a)
\(d=0\).
-
(b)
d is k-centralizing.
-
(c)
d is k-commuting.
Proof
It is clear that (a) implies (b). If (b) holds, then by Theorem 1 and Proposition 1, we obtain
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Thus (c) holds. Now, let d be k-commuting. Choose \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\). Then
For every \(r\in \hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\), we have \( (r+u)=(r+u)^k. \) Hence
From (1) and (2) we infer that
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Thus (c) implies that (a). \(\square \)
As an immediate consequence from Theorem 3, we have the following result.
Corollary 4
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then the zero map is the only centralizing derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Let \([m,n]_1=[m, n]\) and \([m, n]_k=[[m, n]_{k-1}, n]\) for all \(m,n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and all positive integers \(k>1\).
Corollary 5
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and d be a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Then the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(a)
\(d=0\).
-
(b)
d is centralizing.
-
(c)
For every \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), d is k-centralizing.
-
(d)
There exists \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that d is k-centralizing.
-
(e)
There exist positive integers k, l such that \(l\ge 2\) and \([d(m), n]_k=[m, n]^l\) for all \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\)
Proof
This follows from Theorem 3 with the observation that for every \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\), we have \([m, n]\in \hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) and so \([m, n]^l=0\) for all \(l\ge 2\).\( \square \)
We conclude the section with the following result.
Theorem 4
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and d be a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Then the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(a)
G is discrete.
-
(b)
\(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is commutative.
-
(c)
There exist \(i, j, k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that \([d(m), n]_i^j=[m, n]_k\) for all \(m, n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
In this case, \(d=0\).
Proof
If G is discrete, then by Proposition 3.1 of [9], we have \(L_0^\infty (G)^*=L^1(G)\). Since G is an abelian, \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is commutative. Thus (a) implies (b). It is clear that (b) implies (c) and (d). Now, let \(i, j, k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) and
Then for every \(u\in \Lambda _0(G)\), we have
On the one hand, for every \(r\in \hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\), we get
Hence
which implies that G is discrete. To complete the proof, it suffices to notice that the assertion (c) implies that \(d(m\cdot n^i)^j=[m, n]\cdot n^{k-1}\). \(\square \)
4 Inner derivations of \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\)
A derivation d on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is said to be inner if there exists \(n_0\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that \(d(m)=[m,n_0]\) for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Proposition 2
Let G be a locally compact abelian group and d be a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). Then the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(a)
d is inner.
-
(b)
There exists \(n_0\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that for each \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) the mapping \(m\mapsto d(m)+n_0\cdot m\) is k-commuting.
-
(c)
There exists \(n_0\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that the mapping \(m\mapsto d(m)+n_0\cdot m\) is k-commuting.
-
(d)
There exists \(n_0\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) such that the mapping \(m\mapsto d(m)+n_0\cdot m\) is k-centralizing.
Proof
Let there exist \(n_0\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) such that \(d(m)=[m,n_0]\) for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). For \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\) and \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\), we obtain
It follows that
Hence (a) implies (b). It is obvious that (b)\(\Rightarrow \)(c)\(\Rightarrow \) (d). To complete the proof, let (d) hold. Define the function \(D:L_0^\infty (G)^*\rightarrow L_0^\infty (G)^*\) by
It is clear that D is a derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\). So
We now invoke Corollary 4 to conclude that \(D=0\). So, we obtain (a). \(\square \)
In the sequel, let \(\hbox {InnD}(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) be the space of all inner derivations on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\).
Theorem 5
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then \(InnD (L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) is continuously linearly isomorphic to \(L_0^\infty (G)^*/L^1(G)\).
Proof
We define the mapping \(\mathfrak {I}\) from \(L_0^\infty (G)^*/L^1(G)\) into \(\hbox {InnD}(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\) by
where \(\mathfrak {I}_m(n)=[n, m]\) for all \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). By Proposition 1, the mapping \(\mathfrak {I}\) is well defined. Obviously, \(\mathfrak {I}\) is a linear map from \(L_0^\infty (G)^*/L^1(G)\) onto \(\hbox {InnD}(L_0^\infty (G)^*)\). To see that \(\mathfrak {I}\) is injective, let \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and
Then
for all \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). It follows that
Hence \(m+L^1(G)=L^1(G)\). Consequently, \(\mathfrak {I}\) is an isomorphism. Now, let \(n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(\phi \in L^1(G)\). Then
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). This implies that
for all \(m\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\) and \(\phi \in L^1(G)\). Hence
Therefore, \(\mathfrak {I}\) is continuous. \(\square \)
We finish the paper with following result.
Theorem 6
Let G be a locally compact abelian group. Then the following assertions are equivalent.
-
(a)
G is discrete.
-
(b)
Any derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is zero.
-
(c)
Any inner derivation on \(L_0^\infty (G)^*\) is zero.
Proof
If G is discrete, then \(\hbox {Ann}_r(L_0^\infty (G)^*)=\{ 0\}\). By Theorem 1,
Hence (a) implies (b). It is plain that (b) implies (c). Finally, if (c) holds, then \([m,n]=0\) for all \(m,n\in L_0^\infty (G)^*\). This implies that
So \(L^1(G)=L_0^\infty (G)^*\). This shows that G is discrete; see Proposition 3.1 of [9]. \(\square \)
References
Bresar, M., Mathieu, M.: Derivations mapping into the radical III. J. Funct. Anal. 133, 21–29 (1995)
Conway, J.B.: A Course in Functional Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1985)
Fosner, M., Persin, N.: On a functional equation related to derivations in prime rings. Monatsh. Math. 167(2), 189–203 (2012)
Hewitt, E., Ross, K.: Abstract Harmonic Analysis I. Springer, New York (1970)
Jun, K.W., Kim, H.M.: Approximate derivations mapping into the radicals of Banach algebras. Taiwan. J. Math. 11, 277–288 (2007)
Lau, A.T., Pym, J.: Concerning the second dual of the group algebra of a locally compact group. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 41, 445–460 (1990)
Mathieu, M., Murphy, G.J.: Derivations mapping into the radical. Arch. Math. 57, 469–474 (1991)
Mathieu, M., Runde, V.: Derivations mapping into the radical II. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 24, 485–487 (1992)
Mehdipour, M.J., Nasr-Isfahani, R.: Compact left multipliers on Banach algebras related to locally compact group. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 79, 227–238 (2009)
Posner, E.C.: Derivations in prime rings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 8, 1093–1100 (1957)
Sinclair, A.M.: Continuous derivations on Banach algebras. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 20(1), 166–170 (1969)
Singer, I.M., Wermer, J.: Derivations on commutative normed algebras. Math. Ann. 129, 260–264 (1955)
Thomas, M.: The image of a derivation is contained in the radical. Ann. Math. 128, 435–460 (1988)
Vukman, J.: On left Jordan derivations of rings and Banach algebras. Aequ. Math. 75, 260–266 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. S. Wilson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehdipour, M.J., Saeedi, Z. Derivations on group algebras of a locally compact abelian group. Monatsh Math 180, 595–605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-015-0800-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-015-0800-1