Abstract
Background
Fracture of the distal clavicle is not uncommon. Despite the vast literature available for the management of this fracture, there is no consensus regarding the gold standard treatment for this fracture.
Purpose
To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of acute unstable distal clavicle fracture when treated by a modified coracoclavicular stabilization technique using a bidirectional coracoclavicular loop system.
Methods
Thirty-nine patients (32 males, 7 females) with acute unstable distal clavicle fractures treated by modified coracoclavicular stabilization using the surgical technique of bidirectional coracoclavicular (CC) loops seated behind the coracoacromial (CA) ligament were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up time was 35.7 months (range 24–47 months). The outcomes measured included union rate, union time, CC distances when compared to the patients’ uninjured shoulders, and the Constant and ASES shoulder scores, which were evaluated 6 months after surgery.
Results
All fractures displayed clinical union within 13 weeks postoperatively. The mean union time was 9.2 weeks (range 7–13 weeks). At the time of union, the CC distances on the affected shoulders were on average 0.9 mm (range 0–1.6 mm) longer than the unaffected shoulders. At 6 months after surgery, the Constant and ASES scores were on average 93.4 (72–100) and 91.5 (75–100), respectively. No complications related to the fixation loops, musculocutaneous nerve injuries, or fractures of coracoid or clavicle were recorded. One case of surgical wound dehiscence was observed due to superficial infection. Enlargement of the clavicle drill hole without migration of the buttons was observed in 9 out of 16 cases at a follow-up time of at least 30 months after the original operation.
Conclusions
Modified CC stabilization using bidirectional CC loops seated behind the CA ligament is a simple surgical technique that naturally restores stability to the distal clavicle fracture. It also produces predictable outcomes, a high union rate, good to excellent shoulder function, and a low complication rate. The buttons and suture loops were routinely removed in a second operation in order to prevent late stress fracture of the clavicle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Fracture of distal clavicle is not uncommon, and it accounts for 15–20 % of all clavicle fractures [1, 2]. Type II, classified by Neer [3, 4], is often unstable and significantly displaces due to the disruption of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligament. A high incidence of nonunion is reported, with the distal clavicle nonunion comprising up to 30 % of all clavicle fracture nonunions [5, 6]. The treatment options of this fracture include both conservative and operative management. Conservative treatment consists of sling immobilization and can be used for stable and nondisplaced fractures. However, for most displaced fractures, surgical fixation is recommended [7–9]. Although a variety of surgical techniques have been proposed [3, 4, 6–12] including plate-screw fixation, hook plating, k-wires, tension band wiring, CC screw, CC sling using tendon or synthetic suture, and arthroscopic TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA), there is no consensus regarding the gold standard treatment for this fracture [13]. Several studies have reported complications related to fixation techniques, including metal breakage and migration and adverse effects such as clavicle and coracoid fracture [11, 12, 14–17]. This fracture has three main problematic characteristics. The first is that the distal fragment is usually small, comminuted, and consists of soft cancellous bone. The second is that the fracture is located near the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. The last is that there is upward displacement of the proximal fragment due to the huge deforming force caused by rupture of the CC ligament. Stable fixation is always difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures (type IIb) when treated by modified CC stabilization using the surgical technique of bidirectional CC loops seated behind the coracoacromial (CA) ligament.
Materials and methods
Between January 2008 and May 2014, 54 patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures Neer’s classification type IIb were retrospectively reviewed. Fifteen cases were excluded due to associated fractures (n = 4), significant head injuries (n = 2), late presentation (>21 days) (n = 6), and loss of follow-up (n = 3). A total of 39 acute cases (acute defined as ≤21 days) were enrolled in this study (Table 1). Thirty-two patients were male and seven were female, with a mean age of 37.5 years (range 17–52 years). The mean follow-up period was 35.7 months (range 24–47 months). The mechanism of injuries included road traffic accidents (n = 19), sports-related accidents (n = 12), and falls (n = 8). All patients were scheduled for modified CC stabilization using bidirectional CC loops seated behind the CA ligament by one surgeon (Kanchanatawan W). The operations were performed within a time period of 3–20 days from the date of injury (average 12.5 days). All patients were assessed using clinical status and radiographic evaluation at follow-up every 3–4 weeks until clinical union was observed. The outcomes were measured by union rate, union time, the functional shoulder score at 6 months after surgery (Constant score [18] and ASES score [19]), and the difference of the CC distance of the affected shoulder to the patient’s uninjured shoulder measured in a plain radiograph at time of clinical union. The complications were recorded.
Surgical technique
Under general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the beach chair position (at 60°). A 6-cm vertical incision was made from the tip of the coracoid to the clavicle. The deltoid fibers were split to expose the tip and base of the coracoid as well as the CA ligament. Four strands of no. 5 FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) were passed around the coracoid base from the medial to lateral side by a suture retriever (mini-open rotator cuff repair instrument, blue color, Conmed, Linvatec, USA) (Fig. 1a). In order to avoid injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, subperiosteal dissection at the medial side of coracoid base was recommended [20]. All sutures stayed behind the CA ligament and at least 1.4 cm posterior to the tip of the coracoid (range 1.4–1.7 cm). A 2.5-mm hole was drilled 1 cm medial to the fracture. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm bicortical purchase, which was particularly important for oblique fracture. A second hole was then placed 1.5–2 cm medially (Fig. 1b). Two loops (4 strands) of no. 5 FiberWire were passed through each clavicle hole strand by strand, assisted by a two-way shuttle (Fig. 1c). The FiberWire loops were then passed through the medial hole of the buttons (Endobutton, Smith & Nephew, MA, USA). The fracture was manually reduced, and one loop over the lateral button was tied. Once complete reduction was confirmed visually and fluoroscopically, the other three loops were also tied tightly (Fig. 1d).
Postoperative care
Six weeks of using an arm sling was recommended postoperatively. Controlled passive mobilization of the shoulder was allowed on the second day after surgery. Active assisted exercise was allowed after the third week.
Results
All fractures displayed clinical union within 13 weeks postoperatively. The mean union time was 9.2 weeks (range 7–13 weeks). Once the bony union was observed, the differences in CC distances were measured in a plain radiographs. The distances in the affected shoulders were found to be an average of 0.9 mm (range 0–1.6 mm) longer than the unaffected shoulders (Fig. 2a, b). At 6 months after surgery, the Constant and ASES scores were on average 93.4 (72–100) and 91.5 (75–100), respectively. No complications related to the fixation loops, musculocutaneous nerve injuries, or fractures of the coracoid or clavicle were recorded. One surgical wound dehiscence was observed due to superficial infection (N.Y. 52-year-old male). Local wound care and oral antibiotics were continued for an additional 10 days in this patient. The wound healed without additional surgical management. Enlargement of the clavicle drill hole without migration of the buttons was observed in 9 out of 16 cases at a follow-up time of at least 30 months after the original operation. The buttons and suture loops were removed under local anesthesia in a second operation (Fig. 3a, b).
Discussions
Unstable distal clavicle fracture retains high risk of nonunion; thus, surgical fixation is widely accepted as the treatment of choice. Although there are a variety of surgical options reported in the literature [3, 4, 6–12], none of the fixation techniques have been proposed as the “Gold Standard” of treatment for acute unstable distal clavicle fracture. There are several factors that contribute to the instability and complications of fixation. First of all, the distal fragment is usually small, comminuted, and consists of soft cancellous bone. Secondly, the fracture is located near the AC joint. Lastly, there is upward displacement of the proximal fragment due to the huge deforming force caused by the ruptured CC ligament. Various operative techniques treated distal clavicle fractures have been described. These include direct fracture repair (k-wire fixation, tension band wiring, plate and screws, hook plating), CC interval stabilization (CC screw, CC suspension using tendon or synthetic suture, arthroscopic TightRope), and combined direct fracture repair with CC interval stabilization. The rigid fixation used in the direct fracture repair and the CC screw fixation have high potential for complications related to fixation failure, metal breakage, and migration [10, 14, 16]. The hook plate was reported to have complications of secondary clavicle fracture, acromial erosion, impingement, and rotator cuff injury [9–11, 21]. According to a meta-analysis by Stegeman et al. [17], these major complications when using the hook plate had an 11-fold increased risk compared to intramedullary fixation and had a 24-fold increased risk when compared to suture anchoring. They recommended avoiding use of the hook plate due to the number and severity of the complications. Most of the metal fixation methods used in the direct fracture repair group usually required second operations for implant removal. Current surgical techniques have focused more on CC interval stabilization [22–25]. These types of surgical techniques were developed with the aim of providing anatomic augmentation of the CC ligaments using both open and arthroscopic approaches. However, arthroscopic TightRope requires a high level of arthroscopic skill and has also had serious reported complications related to fracture of the coracoid and clavicle [25]. Some combined techniques were reported successful outcomes such as tension band wiring combined with suture anchors or a flip button [22, 23] or use of a T-plate combined with a TightRope [24].
In this study, acute (≤21 days) unstable distal clavicle fractures were treated by modified CC stabilization using bidirectional CC loops seated behind the CA ligament. The aim of this technique was to restore a strong and stable anatomic CC interval that permitted indirect anatomic reduction in the fracture and biological healing of the ruptured native CC ligament. The advantages of this technique are the CC loops seated close to the axis of clavicle in sagittal plane, so it minimizes anterior instability. The CA ligament prevents slippage of the CC loops during shoulder movement. To avoid stress fracture, smaller clavicle holes were used and the coracoid was looped instead of drilled. The bidirectional CC loops also provided control in both the coronal and sagittal planes, similar to the native conoid and trapezoid ligaments [26]. With a minimally invasive indirect reduction, fracture healing was expected to be earlier than with alternate direct fracture repair technique.
Limitations of this study include a small number of study subjects and that only midterm (follow-up period range 24–47 months) results were assessed. Any possible late complications such as stress fracture of coracoid, clavicle, or AC joint arthritis cannot be detected. There was no control group in this study because all clavicle fractures Neer type IIb in our services were treated by only one surgical technique (modified CC stabilization using bidirectional CC loops seated behind the CA ligament).
Conclusions
The ideal surgical technique that can be considered as the gold standard to treat an acute unstable distal clavicle fractures should provide stable fixation that allows the fracture to heal and have minimal complications. Modified CC stabilization using bidirectional CC loops seated behind the CA ligament is a simple surgical technique that naturally restores stability to the distal clavicle fracture and produces predictable outcomes, a high union rate, good to excellent shoulder function, and a low complication rate. In order to prevent late stress fracture of the clavicle, it was recommended to routinely remove the buttons and suture loops under local anesthesia.
References
Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132
Herscovici D Jr, Sanders R, DiPasquale T, Gregory P (1995) Injuries of the shoulder girdle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 318:54–60
Neer CS 2nd (1963) Fracture of the distal clavicle with detachment of the coracoclavicular ligaments in adults. J Trauma 3:99–110
Neer CS 2nd (1968) Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:43–50
Robinson CM, Cairns DA (2004) Primary nonoperative treatment of displaced lateral fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A(4):778–782
Edwards DJ, Kavanagh TG, Flannery MC (1992) Fractures of the distal clavicle: a case for fixation. Injury 23(1):44–46
Anderson K (2003) Evaluation and treatment of distal clavicle fractures. Clin Sports Med 22(2):319–326 (vii)
Webber MC, Haines JF (2000) The treatment of lateral clavicle fractures. Injury 31(3):175–179
Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Shin SH, Gong HS (2011) Treatment of distal clavicle fracture: a systematic review of treatment modalities in 425 fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(4):525–533
Banerjee R, Waterman B, Padalecki J, Robertson W (2011) Management of distal clavicle fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(7):392–401
Flinkkila T, Ristiniemi J, Lakovaara M, Hyvonen P, Leppilahti J (2006) Hook-plate fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures: a report on 63 patients. Acta Orthop 77(4):644–649
Kona J, Bosse MJ, Staeheli JW, Rosseau RL (1990) Type II distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective review of surgical treatment. J Orthop Trauma 4(2):115–120
Sambandam B, Gupta R, Kumar S, Maini L (2014) Fracture of distal end clavicle: a review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 5(2):65–73
Lyons FA, Rockwood CA Jr (1990) Migration of pins used in operations on the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1262–1267
Post M (1989) Current concepts in the treatment of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 245:89–101
Sajid S, Fawdington R, Sinha M (2012) Locking plates for displaced fractures of the lateral end of clavicle: potential pitfalls. Int J Shoulder Surg 6(4):126–129
Stegeman SA, Nacak H, Huvenaars KH, Stijnen T, Krijnen P, Schipper IB (2013) Surgical treatment of Neer type-II fractures of the distal clavicle: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 84(2):184–190
Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164
Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K (2003) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 19(10):1109–1120
Clavert P, Lutz JC, Wolfram-Gabel R, Kempf JF, Kahn JL (2009) Relationships of the musculocutaneous nerve and the coracobrachialis during coracoid abutment procedure (Latarjet procedure). Surg Radiol Anat SRA 31(1):49–53
Nadarajah R, Mahaluxmivala J, Amin A, Goodier DW (2005) Clavicular hook-plate: complications of retaining the implant. Injury 36(5):681–683
Choi S, Kim SR, Kang H, Kim D, Park YG (2015) Modified tension band fixation and coracoclavicular stabilisation for unstable distal clavicle fracture. Injury 46(2):259–264
Shin SJ, Roh KJ, Kim JO, Sohn HS (2009) Treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures using two suture anchors and suture tension bands. Injury 40(12):1308–1312
Hohmann E, Hansen T, Tetsworth K (2012) Treatment of Neer type II fractures of the lateral clavicle using distal radius locking plates combined with TightRope augmentation of the coraco-clavicular ligaments. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(10):1415–1421
Spiegl UJ, Smith SD, Euler SA, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ, Wijdicks CA (2014) Biomechanical consequences of coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques on clavicle strength. Am J Sports Med 42(7):1724–1730
Stucken C, Cohen SB (2015) Management of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Orthop Clin N Am 46(1):57–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Approval for this study was given by the Committee on human related to research involving human subjects at Lerdsin General Hospital.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanchanatawan, W., Wongthongsalee, P. Management of acute unstable distal clavicle fracture with a modified coracoclavicular stabilization technique using a bidirectional coracoclavicular loop system. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 139–143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1723-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1723-1