Abstract
In this work we give a characterization of pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {S}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\) and \(\mathbb {H}_c^n\times \mathbb {R}\), extending an analogous result by Asperti-Lobos-Mercuri for the pseudo-parallel case in space forms. Moreover, when \(n=3\), we prove that any pseudo-parallel surface has flat normal bundle. We also give examples of pseudo-parallel surfaces which are neither semi-parallel nor pseudo-parallel surfaces in a slice. Finally, when \(n\ge 4\) we give examples of pseudo-parallel surfaces with non vanishing normal curvature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the theory of submanifolds of a space form, Asperti-Lobos-Mercuri introduced in Asperti et al. (1999) pseudo-parallel submanifolds as a direct generalization of semi-parallel submanifolds in the sense of Deprez (1985), which in turn, are a generalization of parallel submanifolds (extrinsically symmetric in Ferus’ terminology) Ferus (1980) (in particular, of umbilical and totally geodesic submanifolds), and as extrinsic analogues of pseudo-symmetric spaces in the sense of Deszcz (1992). They studied pseudo-parallel surfaces of a space form in Asperti et al. (2002), Lobos (2002), and proved that they are surfaces with flat normal bundle or \(\lambda \)-isotropic surfaces in the sense of O’Neill (1965) (i.e. surfaces whose ellipse of curvature in any point is a circle). In particular, they proved that pseudo-parallel surfaces of space forms with non vanishing normal curvature in codimension 2 are superminimal surfaces in the sense of Bryant (1982) (i.e. surfaces which are minimal and \(\lambda \)-isotropic).
An isometric immersion \(f:M^m \rightarrow \tilde{M}^n\) is said to be pseudo-parallel if its second fundamental form \(\alpha \) satisfies the following condition:
for some smooth real-valued function \(\phi \) on \(M^m\), where \(\tilde{R}\) is the curvature tensor corresponding to the Van der Waerden-Bortolotti connection \(\tilde{\nabla }\) of f and \(X\wedge Y\) denotes the endomorphism defined by
Considering the product space \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c \times \mathbb {R}\) as the ambient space, the first studies of pseudo-parallel submanifolds were started in Lin and Yang (2014) and Lobos and Tassi (2019), where a classification of its hypersurfaces was given, generalizing the classification of parallel and semi-parallel hypersurfaces in Calvaruso et al. (2010) and Van der Veken and Vrancken (2008).
In this work we started the study of pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) (with \(c\ne 0\)). We begin by observing that any isometric immersion \(f: M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^n_c \times \mathbb {R}\) with flat normal bundle is pseudo-parallel (see Proposition 2.2). So, we state the main result of this work:
Theorem 1.1
Let \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) be a pseudo-parallel surface which does not have flat normal bundle on any open subset of \(M^2\). Then \(n \ge 4\), f is \(\lambda \)-isotropic and
where K is the Gaussian curvature, \(\lambda \) is a smooth real-valued function on \(M^2\), H is the mean curvature vector field of f and T is the tangent part of \(\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\), the canonical unit vector field tangent to the second factor of \(\mathbb {Q}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\).
Conversely, if f is \(\lambda \)-isotropic then f is pseudo-parallel.
We remark that Theorem 1.1 extends for \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c\times \mathbb {R}\) a similar result for pseudo-parallel surfaces into space forms given by Asperti-Lobos-Mercuri in Asperti et al. (2002).
However, the class of pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {Q}_c^3\times \mathbb {R}\) is not empty. In the last section we give examples of semi-parallel surfaces which are not parallel as well as examples of pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {S}_c^3\times \mathbb {R}\) and \(\mathbb {H}_c^3\times \mathbb {R}\) which are neither semi-parallel nor pseudo-parallel surfaces in a slice.
Finally, we remark that pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c \times \mathbb {R}\) with \(n\ge 4\) and non vanishing normal curvature do exist, as shown in Examples 4.3, 4.5 and 4.6 in the last section.
2 Preliminaries
First of all, we establish the notation that we use along this work. Let \(f: M^m \rightarrow \tilde{M}^n\) be an isometric immersion. We decompose the tangent bundle \(T\tilde{M}\) of \(\tilde{M}^n\) in its tangent and normal parts, as a sum \(T\tilde{M} = TM \oplus N_fM\), where TM and \(N_fM\) are the tangent bundle of \(M^m\) and the normal bundle of f, respectively. Using this notation we consider \(\tilde{\nabla } =\nabla \oplus \nabla ^\perp \) the Van der Waerden-Bortolotti connection of f and \(\tilde{R} = R \oplus R^\perp \) its curvature tensor. The second fundamental form of f is the symmetric 2-tensor denoted by \(\alpha :TM \times TM \rightarrow N_fM\). For any \(\xi \in N_fM\) the correspondent Weingarten operator in the \(\xi \)-direction is denoted by \(A_{\xi }\), that is,
The mean curvature vector field of f is denoted by H. Finally, we say that f has flat normal bundle (or vanishing normal curvature) if \(R^\perp = 0\).
An isometric immersion \(f:M^m \rightarrow \tilde{M}^n\) is said to be:
-
1.
Totally geodesic if
$$\begin{aligned} \alpha (X,Y) = 0; \end{aligned}$$(2.1) -
2.
Umbilical if the mean curvature vector field H of f satisfies
$$\begin{aligned} \alpha (X,Y) = \langle X,Y \rangle H; \end{aligned}$$(2.2) -
3.
Locally parallel if
$$\begin{aligned} (\tilde{\nabla }_X\alpha )(Y,Z) = 0; \end{aligned}$$(2.3) -
4.
Semi-parallel if
$$\begin{aligned} (\tilde{R}(X,Y)\cdot \alpha )(Z,W) = 0; \end{aligned}$$(2.4) -
5.
Pseudo-parallel if
$$\begin{aligned} (\tilde{R}(X,Y)\cdot \alpha )(Z,W) = \phi [(X \wedge Y)\cdot \alpha ](Z,W), \end{aligned}$$(2.5)for some smooth real-valued function \(\phi \) on \(M^m\) and for any vector X,Y,Z and W tangents to M.
Here the notation means
A space form \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c\) is a simply connected, complete, n-dimensional Riemannian manifold with constant sectional curvature c. Namely, \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c\) is the n-dimensional sphere \(\mathbb {S}^n_c\) or the n-dimensional hyperbolic space \(\mathbb {H}^n_c\), respectively given by
where \(\mathbb {L}^{n+1}\) is the \((n+1)\)-dimensional Minkowski space, that is, the \((n+1)\)-dimensional euclidean space \(\mathbb {R}^{n+1}\) endowed with the inner product
This work is devoted to the study of these classes of surfaces with \(\mathbb {Q}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\) as the ambient space and we always assume \(c \ne 0\). Thus, let \(\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\) be the canonical unit vector field tangent to the second factor of \(\mathbb {Q}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\). For a given isometric immersion \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\), it is convenient to consider the following decomposition of \(\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\) in its tangent and normal parts:
for some \(T \in TM\) and some \(\eta \in N_fM\).
Another tools we make use are the Fundamental Equations for a surface \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) and now we recall them. Let \(\{e_1,e_2\}\) be an orthonormal local frame for \(M^2\) and set \(\alpha _{ij} = \alpha (e_i,e_j)\). By \(\delta _{ij}\) we mean the Kronecker’s Delta. From Mendonça and Tojeiro (2013) we have the following equations:
Gauss:
Codazzi:
Ricci:
It follows from the Ricci equation that
Thus, the equation (2.9) is equivalent to the following equation:
On the other hand, the pseudo-parallelism condition is equivalent to the following two equations:
where
is the Gaussian curvature of \(M^2\). As a consequence, we have the next lemma.
Lemma 2.1
Let \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) be a pseudo-parallel surface. Then \(R^{\perp }(X,Y)H = 0\), for all \(X,Y \in TM\).
Proof
Immediate by equation (2.11), since \(H = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha _{11} + \alpha _{22})\). \(\square \)
Proposition 2.2
Let \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) be a surface with flat normal bundle. Then f is a pseudo-parallel immersion.
Proof
Since f has flat normal bundle, by equations (2.11) and (2.12) we conclude that f is \(\phi \)-pseudo-parallel by taking \(\phi = K\), where K is the Gaussian curvature of \(M^2\). \(\square \)
In the following, we have two propositions that is useful to construct examples of pseudo-parallel surfaces.
Proposition 2.3
Let \(f: M^m \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^n_c\) be an isometric immersion and let \(j:\mathbb {Q}^n_c \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^{n}_c\times \mathbb {R}\) be a totally geodesic immersion. If f is \(\phi \)-pseudo-parallel, then \(j \circ f\) is \(\phi \)-pseudo-parallel.
Proof
In this proof, we denote the second fundamental form of f and \(j \circ f\) respectively by \(\alpha ^f\) and \(\alpha ^{j \circ f}\). In the same way, we denote the normal curvature tensors of f and \(j \circ f\) respectively by \(R^{\perp }_f\) and \(R^{\perp }_{j \circ f}\). Since j is a totally geodesic immersion, we have the following relations:
Therefore, applying Definition 2.5 we obtain
\(\square \)
Proposition 2.4
Let \(f: M^m \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) be an isometric immersion and let \(j:\mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^{n+l}_c\times \mathbb {R}\) be a totally geodesic immersion. If f is \(\phi \)-pseudo-parallel, then \(j \circ f\) is \(\phi \)-pseudo-parallel.
Proof
Is analogous to that of Proposition 2.3. \(\square \)
3 Proof of the main theorem
Before we give a proof of Theorem 1.1 we recall that \(f: M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_{c}^n \times \mathbb {R}\) is a \(\lambda \)-isotropic surface if, for each \(x \in M\), the ellipse of curvature \(\{\alpha (X,X) \in N_fM(x); X \in T_xM \quad \text{ with } \quad \Vert X \Vert = 1\}\) is a sphere with radius \(\lambda (x)\), where \(\lambda : M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a smooth function. The following result, due to Sakaki in Sakaki (2015) plays a vital role in the proof of Theorem 1.1. Its statement is:
Theorem 3.1
(see Sakaki (2015)) Let \(f:M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_c^3 \times \mathbb {R}\) be a minimal surface with \(c \ne 0\). If f is \(\lambda \)-isotropic, then f is totally geodesic.
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1.1.
Proof of Theorem 1.1
Let us suppose that \(f: M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^n_c \times \mathbb {R}\) is pseudo-parallel with non vanishing normal curvature. Combining equations (2.10) to (2.13) we get
Next, we prove that \(\{\alpha _{12}, \alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22}\}\) is linearly independent. We can suppose \(\phi \ne K\). Otherwise, since \(\langle R^{\perp }(e_1,e_2)\xi ,\zeta \rangle = - \langle R^{\perp }(e_1,e_2)\zeta ,\xi \rangle \), by the equations (2.11) and (2.12) we would have \(R^{\perp } = 0\), which is a contradiction. Notice that \(\alpha _{12} \ne 0\) and \(\alpha _{11} \ne \alpha _{22}\). In fact, if \(\alpha _{12} = 0\) then \(R^\perp (e_1,e_2) \alpha _{12} = 0\) which implies by equation (2.12) that \(\alpha _{11} = \alpha _{22}\), and in this case f is umbilical and has flat normal bundle, a contradiction. If \(\alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22} = 0\), then \(R^\perp (e_1,e_2) (\alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22}) = 0\), which implies by equation (2.11) that \(\alpha _{12} = 0\).
Assume that there exist \(\lambda , \mu \in \mathbb {R}\) such that \(\lambda \alpha _{12} + \mu (\alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22}) = 0\). Then, by equations (2.11) and (2.12) we get \(\lambda (\alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22}) - 4\mu \alpha _{12}= 0\). If \(\mu \ne 0\) then \((\alpha _{11} - \alpha _{22}) = \frac{-\lambda }{\mu }\alpha _{12}\) and thus \(\left( \frac{-\lambda ^2}{\mu } - 4\mu \right) \alpha _{12} = 0\), which lead us to \(\lambda ^2 = -4\mu ^2 < 0\), a contradiction. So \(\mu = 0\), and therefore \(\lambda = 0\).
Using this and equations (3.1) and (3.2) we obtain
From the equation (2.13) we get
In particular, f is \(\lambda \)-isotropic with \(\lambda ^2 = 4K - 3\phi + c(\Vert T \Vert ^2 - 1)\).
Now, we prove that \(n \ge 4\). Suppose that \(n=3\). Since f has non flat normal bundle, for any \(x \in M^2\) we have that \(R^{\perp }(x)(e_1,e_2): N_fM(x) \rightarrow N_fM(x)\) is a non zero antisymmetric linear operator, defined in a two-dimensional vector space. Thus, by Lemma 2.1 we conclude that \(H(x) = 0\). But from Theorem 3.1, we conclude that f is totally geodesic and in particular, \(R^{\perp }(x) = 0\), which is a contradiction.
Conversely, let us assume that f is \(\lambda \)-isotropic. Set \(X = \cos \theta e_1 + \sin \theta e_2\). Then
Since \(\lambda \) does not depend on \(\theta \), taking the derivative with respect to \(\theta \) we get
On the other hand, with \(Y = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(e_1 + e_2)\) we get
that is,
Using this and the Gauss equation we get
From the Ricci equation \(R^{\perp }(e_1,e_2)\alpha _{ii} = \langle \alpha _{22} - \alpha _{11}, \alpha _{ii} \rangle \alpha _{12}, i = 1,2\), we obtain
Using the Ricci equation once more we obtain
Therefore, taking \(\phi = \frac{4K - \lambda ^2 + c(\Vert T \Vert ^2 - 1)}{3}\), we conclude that f is pseudo-parallel according to equations (2.11) and (2.12). \(\square \)
4 Some Examples
We now introduce the first examples of semi-parallel and pseudo-parallel surfaces of \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\) which are not locally parallel and semi-parallel, respectively, and that are not just inclusions of surfaces of \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c\) into \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\).
Example 4.1
A general construction of submanifolds of \(\mathbb {Q}^n_c \times \mathbb {R}\) with flat normal bundle and T as a principal direction can be found in Mendonça and Tojeiro (2014), by Mendonça-Tojeiro. For our purpose, based on this work, the construction becomes: let \(g: J \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^3_{c}\) be a regular curve and \(\{\xi _1, \xi _2\}\) an orthonormal set of vector fields normal to g. Put
where \(j: \mathbb {Q}^3_{c} \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^3_{c} \times \mathbb {R}\) and \(i: \mathbb {Q}^3_{c} \times \mathbb {R}\rightarrow \mathbb {E}^{5}\) are the canonical inclusions. If \(\alpha = (\alpha _0, \alpha _1, \alpha _2, \alpha _3): I \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^{2}_{c} \times \mathbb {R}\) is a smooth regular curve with \(\alpha ' _3(s) \ne 0, \quad \forall s \in I\), we have the following isometric immersion \(f: M^2 = J \times I \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\) given by
At regular points, f is an isometric immersion with flat normal bundle and T as a principal direction. Conversely, if \(f: M^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\) is an isometric immersion with flat normal bundle and T as a principal direction, then f is given by (4.1) for some isometric immersion \(g: \mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\) and some smooth regular curve \(\alpha : I \rightarrow \mathbb {Q}_c^{2} \times \mathbb {R}\) whose its last coordinate has non vanishing derivative.
Geometrically, f is obtained by parallel transporting a curve in a product submanifold \(\mathbb {Q}^{2}_{c} \times \mathbb {R}\) of a fixed normal space of \(\tilde{g}\) with respect to its normal connection.
In particular, when dealing with pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\), at least those that have T as a principal direction are fully described by this method.
We now construct two simple examples. Let us define
By taking
where \(0< d < 1\), if \(c > 0\), or \(d > 0\), if \(c < 0\), and \(\theta : \mathbb {R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is the smooth function given by
we obtain a semi-parallel surface in \(\mathbb {Q}_c^3 \times \mathbb {R}\) that is not locally parallel.
Another example can be obtained by taking \(0< d < 1\) and
where the surface obtained is pseudo-parallel in \(\mathbb {Q}_c^3 \times \mathbb {R}\) but not semi-parallel since its Gaussian curvature does not vanish. Also, notice that it is not contained in a totally geodesic slice of the form \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \{t\}\), for some \(t \in \mathbb {R}\).
Question 4.2
Are there other examples, up to isometries, of pseudo-parallel surfaces in \(\mathbb {Q}^3_c \times \mathbb {R}\) (\(c \ne 0\)), for which T is not a principal direction?
The next three examples show us that for \(n > 3\) there exists pseudo-parallel surfaces with non vanishing normal curvature.
Example 4.3
Let \(f: \mathbb {S}^2_{1/3} \rightarrow \mathbb {S}^4_{1}\) be the classical Veronese surface, given by
which is a locally parallel, minimal and \(\lambda \)-isotropic immersion (as we can see in Chern et al. (1970), Itoh and Ogiue (1973) and Sakamoto (1977)) in \(\mathbb {S}^4_1\) with non vanishing normal curvature. If \(i: \mathbb {S}^4_1 \rightarrow \mathbb {S}^4_1 \times \mathbb {R}\) is the totally geodesic inclusion given by \(i(x) = (x,0)\), then by Proposition 2.3 we have that \(i \circ f\) is a pseudo-parallel immersion in \(\mathbb {S}^4_1 \times \mathbb {R}\) with non vanishing normal curvature.
Conjecture 4.4
The only minimal pseudo-parallel surface in\(\mathbb {Q}^4_c \times \mathbb {R}\)with non vanishing normal curvature and constant\(\phi \)are these of Example4.3.
Example 4.5
It’s known by Chern in Chern (1970) that: “Any minimal immersion of a topological 2-sphere \(\mathbb {S}^2\) into \(\mathbb {S}^4_c\) is a superminimal immersion”. So, by Theorem 1.1, we have that any minimal immersion of a topological 2-sphere into a slice of \(\mathbb {S}^4_c \times \mathbb {R}\) whit non vanishing normal curvature is pseudo-parallel with \(\phi = \frac{4K - c - \lambda ^2}{3}\). Moreover, if the Gaussian curvature is not constant, the immersion is not semi-parallel.
Example 4.6
Let \(f:\mathbb {R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {S}^5_c\) be the surface given by
where \(u = \sqrt{\frac{c}{2}}x\), \(v = \frac{\sqrt{6c}}{2}y\).
This example, that appears in Sakamoto (1989), is a minimal \(\lambda \)-isotropic flat torus with \(\lambda = \sqrt{\frac{c}{2}}\) and non vanishing normal curvature. In particular, f is a pseudo-parallel immersion in \(\mathbb {S}^5_c\) with \(\phi = \frac{-c}{2}\).
Thus, if \(i: \mathbb {S}^5_c \rightarrow \mathbb {S}^5_c \times \mathbb {R}\) is the totally geodesic inclusion given by \(i(x) = (x,0)\), by Proposition 2.3 we have that \(i \circ f\) is a pseudo-parallel immersion in \(\mathbb {S}^5_c \times \mathbb {R}\) with non vanishing normal curvature.
References
Asperti, A.C., Lobos, G.A., Mercuri, F.: Pseudo-parallel immersions of a space form. Mat. Contemp. 17, 59–70 (1999)
Asperti, A.C., Lobos, G.A., Mercuri, F.: Pseudo-parallel submanifolds of a space form. Adv. Geom. 2, 57–71 (2002)
Asperti, A.C., Mercuri, F.: Semi-parallel immersions into space forms. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 8, 883–895 (1994)
Bryant, R.: Conformal and minimal immersions of compact surfaces into the \(4\)-sphere. J. Diff. Geom. 17, 455–473 (1982)
Calvaruso, G., Kowalczyk, D., Van der Veken, J.: On extrinsically symmetric hypersurfaces of \(\mathbb{H}^n\times {\mathbb{R}}\). Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 82, 390–400 (2010)
Chern, S.S.: On minimal spheres in the four-sphere. In: Studies and Essays (Presented to Yu-why Chen on his 60th Birthday, April 1, 1970), Math. Res. Center, Nat. Taiwan Univ., Taipei, pp. 137–150 (1970)
Chern, S.S.: do Carmo, M.P., Kobayashi, S.: Minimal submanifolds of a sphere with second fundamental form of constant length. In: Browder, F.E. (ed.) Functional Analysis and Related Fields, pp. 59–75. Springer, Berlin (1970)
Deprez, J.: Semiparallel surfaces in Euclidean space. J. Geom. 25, 192–200 (1985)
Deszcz, R.: On pseudosymmetric spaces. Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. Sér. A 44, 1–34 (1992)
Lin, F., Yang, B.: Pseudo-parallel hypersurfaces of \({\mathbb{S}}^n \times {\mathbb{R}}\) and \({\mathbb{H}}^n \times {\mathbb{R}}\). JP J. Geom. Topol. 15(2), 99–111 (2014)
Ferus, D.: Symmetric submanifolds of Euclidean space. Math. Ann. 247, 81–93 (1980)
Itoh, T., Ogiue, K.: Isotropic immersion. J. Differ. Geom. 8, 305–316 (1973)
Lobos, G.A.: Pseudo-parallel surfaces in space forms. Differential Geometry, Valencia 2001. World Scientific Publications, River Edge (2002)
Lobos, G.A., Tassi, M.P.: A classification of pseudo-parallel hypersurfaces of \(\mathbb{S}^{n} \times \mathbb{R}\) and \(\mathbb{H}^{n} \times \mathbb{R}\). Differ. Geom. Appl. 62, 72–82 (2019)
Mendonça, B., Tojeiro, R.: Submanifolds of products of space forms. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 62(4), 1283–1314 (2013)
Mendonça, B., Tojeiro, R.: Umbilical submanifolds of \(\mathbb{S}^n \times {\mathbb{R}}\). Can. J. Math. 66, 400–428 (2014)
O’Neill, B.: Isotropic and Kähler immersions. Canad. J. Math. 17, 907–915 (1965)
Sakaki, M.: On the curvature ellipse of minimal surfaces in \(N^3(c) \times {\mathbb{R}}\). Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 22, 165–172 (2015)
Sakamoto, K.: Constant isotropic surfaces in \(5\)-dimensional space forms. Geometria Dedicata 29, 293–306 (1989)
Sakamoto, K.: Planar geodesic immersions. Tohoku Math. J. 29, 25–56 (1977)
Van der Veken, J., Vrancken, L.: Parallel and semi-parallel hypersurfaces of \(\mathbb{S}^n\times {\mathbb{R}}\). Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 39, 355370 (2008)
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the referee for their valuable comments and suggestions towards the improvement of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
G. A. Lobos: Partially supported by FAPESP, Grant 2016/23746-6.
M. P. Tassi: Partially supported by CAPES, Grant 88881.133043/2016-01.
About this article
Cite this article
Lobos, G.A., Tassi, M.P. & Hancco, A.J.Y. Pseudo-parallel surfaces of \(\mathbb {S}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\) and \(\mathbb {H}_c^n \times \mathbb {R}\). Bull Braz Math Soc, New Series 50, 705–715 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-018-00126-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-018-00126-9