Abstract
Purpose
To explore the mediating role of trait anxious personality in the association between quality of life (QoL) and death anxiety (DA), as well as to test the moderating effect of social support in the mediation model.
Methods
The Death Anxiety Scale, Quality of Life Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Scale, and Social Support Rating Scale were used to measure 588 family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. We then constructed a moderated mediation model.
Results
The presence of QoL was negatively associated with DA (β = − 0.67, p < 0.01). Trait anxious personality partially mediated the relationship between QoL and DA (indirect effect β = − 0.08, p < 0.01). Social support moderated both the antecedent and subsequent segments of the mediating paths of “QoL → trait anxious personality → DA” and the direct relationship between QoL and DA. Among caregivers with a low level of social support, the mediating effect coefficient of trait anxious personality was higher at 0.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.059–0.182), in contrast to caregivers with a high level of social support, where the mediating effect coefficient of trait anxious personality was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.029–0.072).
Conclusion
QoL is directly associated with an increased risk of DA and indirectly related to DA by increasing the risk of trait anxious personality among caregivers. Social support can moderate the mediating effect of trait anxious personality and the relationship between QoL and DA. The intervention strategy for preventing DA among caregivers who have encountered QoL reduction should focus on reducing trait anxious personality and social support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
In 2020, the number of new cancer cases worldwide was 19.29 million, and cancer was responsible for 9.96 million deaths [1]. The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, an increase of 47% from 2020 [1]. Caregivers of advanced cancer patients provide direct needs to the patients and witness many clinical symptoms, diagnostic and treatment measures, and the terminal states of the patients [2]. Long-term exposure to death-threatening environments can trigger thoughts and anxiety about death [3]. A study [4] found that being exposed to frequent death reminders was associated with higher death anxiety in caregivers than in cancer patients. The diagnosis process of cancer is a reminder of death with a strong signal. Caregivers feel the threat of death and have a psychological and emotional state of fear; this state is death anxiety (DA) [5, 6]. Some studies [7,8,9] believed that caregivers have a high level of DA. In China, due to the differences in terms of socio-economic culture and lifestyle, there are few research on DA.
Researches [10, 11] showed that caregivers experience reduced quality of life (QoL) while caring for patients with advanced cancer, resulting in increased DA. DA among family caregivers of advanced cancer patients reduces the quality of care and leads to reduced communication on end-of-life care[ [12, 13] and medical decision making [14] between caregivers and advanced cancer patients. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the impact of the QoL on DA among caregivers of advanced cancer patients.
Previous studies [15, 16] have reported that caregivers of advanced cancer patients who showed trait anxious personality have severe DA. According to the trait anxiety theoretical model [17], when individuals are stimulated by internal or external negative events (such as major diseases, natural disasters, and traffic accidents), high levels of trait anxious personality will lead to more state anxiety, such as DA. Some studies [18, 19] believed that the trait anxious personality may increase the level of DA of caregivers. A study [20] found that QoL can increase the DA risk in caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, and trait anxious personality is the most critical mediator.
As a negative psychological state, the trait anxious personality has been reported to be improved by external interventions such as social support [21]. Some studies have shown [22, 23] that individuals with high levels of social support can better adjust themselves and actively resist negative impacts when their QoL declines. The stress process theory [24] suggested that the “stressor” was the reason for the decline in the QoL of caregivers, and then caregivers might develop stress responses such as DA. Therefore, social support is essential for caregivers to cope with stress. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the mediating effect of trait anxious personality and the moderating effect of social support between QoL and DA.
When considering the relationship between QoL and DA within the context of intervention strategies, it is necessary to comprehend the mechanism by which trait anxious personality mediates this association, as well as the moderating effect of social support under the same framework. At present, there is little research in this area. On the other hand, limited attention has been given to DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, with an even lesser understanding of the roles played by trait anxious personality and social support in linking QoL to DA.
Methods
Study participants
A cross-sectional survey was conducted on caregivers of end-of-life cancer patients diagnosed in the inpatient department of Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 2022 to November 2022. Using random cluster sampling, all caregivers of breast cancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, brain tumor, stomach cancer, and lung cancer were included to participate in the self-administered questionnaire survey. The inclusion criteria for caregivers were (1) age ≥ 18 years old, (2) demonstrated an understanding of the research procedures and possessed the ability to read and communicate in Chinese, (3) caregivers provided care for at least 6 months, and (4) no major illness and history of mental illness. The inclusion of cancer patients were (5) age ≥ 18 years old and (6) patients were diagnosed as an inpatient with grade III–IV malignancy (WHO2021). The exclusion criteria for caregivers were (1) cognitive impairment and inability to communicate normally and (2) workers who volunteers or are hired to take care of late stage cancer patients, who do not belong to the patient’s family measures. Strict quality control was implemented during the survey, including participants filling out the questionnaire independently, the neutral explanation of the questionnaire, and the timely examination after the questionnaires were collected.
General information questionnaire
Characteristics of participants included age, gender, education, monthly income, degree of relationship, marital status, basic illness(for example: hypertension, diabetes, and cardiopathy), religious beliefs, and length of care. Patients’ characteristics included age, gender, treatment, daily activity level, recurrence of cancer, and physical symptoms.
Templer’s death anxiety scale
In 1970, American psychologist Templer [25] developed and published the DA Scale with 15 items. The 3-week test–retest reliability of the English original version was 0.83, and the internal consistency coefficient KR20 was 0.76. Scholars from many countries have used this scale to measure the DA levels of patients and their caregivers. It has high reliability and validity and has been used as the gold standard for detecting DA [26].
Yang [27] introduced this scale to China in 2012. The Chinese version of the scale includes four dimensions: stress and pain, emotion, cognition, and time. Nine items are positively scored, and six items (items 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 16) are reverse scored. The total score ranges from 0 to15. The cutoff point is 7, with scores above 7 indicating DA. Higher scores suggest more DA. Cronbach’s α of the scale in this study was 0.71, and the test–retest reliability was 0.831.
Quality of life scale
The World Health Organization on Quality of Life Brief Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) is a simplified scale based on WHOQOL-100 [28]. It includes 26 items and can be divided into four dimensions: physical health, mental health, social relationships, and social environment. Items 3, 4, and 26 are reverse scored. The higher the score, the better the QoL. Cronbach’s α of the scale in this study is 0.90, and the test–retest reliability is 0.86 [29].
Social support revalued scale
The Social Support Revalued Scale (SSRS) was compiled by Xiao [30] in 1986 and contains 10 items. The scale was divided into three dimensions: subjective support (items 1, 2, 3, and 5), objective support (items 6, 7, and 10), and social support (items 4, 8, and 9). The total score ranges from 12 to 66. The cutoff point is 22, with scores above indicating social support. Higher scores suggest more social support. Cronbach’s α of the overall scale is 0.80 [31].
Trait-state anxiety inventory
Spielberger [32] compiled the State-Trait Anxiety Scale in 1970. The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was developed in 1980. STAI has two subscales: state anxiety subscale (S-AI) and trait anxiety subscale (T-AI). This article only quotes the trait anxiety subscale. The total score ranges from 0 to 54. The cutoff point is 40, with scores above indicating trait anxious personality. Higher scores suggest more trait anxious personality. The scale had an internal consistency reliability of 0.90 and a test–retest reliability of 0.86 [32].
Data analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and study variables, and t test and chi-square test were used to compare the distribution of DA with SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk NY, USA). Pearson correlation analysis was used to verify the correlation between caregivers’ social support (regulatory factor) and their DA (dependent variable), QoL (independent variable), and trait anxious personality (intermediate variable). The moderating effect of trait anxious personality and social support on the mediation model between QoL and DA was investigated using model 4 of PROCESS macro version 4.1 (Ohio State University, Hayes, USA) [33]. Finally, bootstrapping method was performed to verify the statistical significance of the mediating effect.
Results
A total of 678 caregivers in the study and 588 caregivers without missing critical research variables were included in this survey, with an effective rate of 93.0%. In total, 297 were female (50.5%) and 291 were male (49.5%). Most were married (490, 83.3%), and aged between 18 and 78 years old, with an average age of 42.48 ± 12.26 years.
This study showed a high DA score among caregivers of advanced cancer patients was 7.92 ± 2.68. The QoL was not optimistic, with scores in the physiological domain, psychological domain, social domain, environmental domain, and subjective QoL of 51.63 ± 11.86, 56.67 ± 13.78, 51.58 ± 17.39, 51.68 ± 13.62, and 63.76 ± 14.10, respectively. The QoL among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer was poor after combining the four domains and subjective QoL. The trait anxiety personality was 64.10 ± 12.94, which indicates mild trait anxiety. The social support was 36.12 ± 2.68, indicating a medium level of social support. Tables 1 and 2 showed that there were differences in DA between length of care, caregiver’s gender, religious beliefs, and patient’s daily activity level, somatic symptoms, and treatment.
Table 3 provided the significant correlation between QoL, trait anxious personality, social support, and DA. DA exhibited a significant negative correlation between social support and QoL but was positively related to anxious personality. Trait anxious personality showed a significant correlation between social support and QoL. QoL was positively associated with social support.
The results of mediation analysis showed that the total effect of QoL on DA was statistically significant (β = − 0.25, p < 0.001). Significant effect coefficient of direct pathway (QoL → trait anxiety personality: β = − 0.43, p < 0.001; trait anxiety personality → DA: β = 0.22, p < 0.001) and indirect pathway (QoL → trait anxiety personality → DA: β = − 0.08, p < 0.001) indicated that trait anxiety personality mediated the relationship between QoL and DA. The direct influence coefficient of QoL on DA (β = − 0.17, p < 0.001) also had a statistical significance, indicating that trait anxiety personality played a partially mediating role in the relationship between QoL and DA, and the ratio of the mediating effect to the total effect was 31.11% (Table 4).
Figure 1 showed the moderated mediation model results. The social support had significant effects on three regression paths (QoL → trait anxiety personality: (β = − 0.34, p < 0.001); QoL → DA: (β = − 0.15, p < 0.001); trait anxiety personality → DA: (β = 0.18, p < 0.001)). In other words, social support significantly moderated the three associations of “QoL → trait anxiety personality,” “QoL → DA,” and “trait anxiety personality → DA.”
Table 5 showed further analysis results of the moderated mediation model. The indirect and direct effects of QoL on DA at low level (mean-SD), moderate level (mean), and high level (mean + SD) of social support were examined. The results found that the indirect effects of “QoL → trait anxiety personality → DA” were statistically significant at all three levels of social support. When the level of social support increased from low to high, the indirect effect coefficients of QoL on DA changed from 0.25 to 0.11, showing a statistically downward trend.
Figure 2 showed the conditional effects of “QoL → trait anxiety personality,” “QoL → DA,” and “trait anxiety personality → DA.” The three conditional effects decrease with increasing social support, and all 95% CI do not include 0. These results indicated that regardless of the level of social support, social support could moderate the associations of “QoL → trait anxiety personality,” “QoL → DA,” and “trait anxiety personality → DA.”
Discussion
Our study explored the moderated mediating effects of trait anxious personality and social support on the relationship between QoL and DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Our results showed that QoL was negatively correlated with DA among caregivers; trait anxiety personality mediated the association between QoL and DA. Social support played a moderating role in the above relationships. A high level of social support could weaken the direct association between QoL and DA, especially reducing the mediating effect of trait anxiety personality.
The level of DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer was high. Overall, 428 (76.3%) participants had high levels of DA (≥ 7 points). The results were identical to previous studies [7,8,9], suggesting that DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer cannot be ignored.
Our study found that QoL was negatively correlated with DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer; the results were identical to previous studies [9, 10, 34]. Due to the long care time, fear of the patient’s disease progression, heavy financial burden, and patient’s physical symptoms (such as pain and vomiting) reduce the caregiver’s QoL and increase DA [9,10,11, 34, 35]. It is proposed that understanding the action mechanism of QoL and DA may be beneficial in developing interventions to reduce DA among caregivers.
The study showed that trait anxious personality partially mediated the association between QoL and DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. According to the trait anxiety theoretical model [17], when individuals are stimulated by internal and external negative events (such as major diseases, natural disasters, and traffic accidents), high levels of trait anxious personality may lead to more DA. The results were identical to this theory and previous studies, indicating that trait anxious personality is an important factor in inducing DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer [17, 20]. In addition, the study showed that caregivers who had encountered QoL reduction were more inclined to have trait anxious personality. Trait anxious personality, acting as a mediating factor, mediated the relationship between QoL and DA. Our study identified that trait anxious personality may serve as one of the internal mechanisms explaining the heightened risk of DA among caregivers who have experienced QoL reduction.
Our results found that social support could moderate the mediating effect of trait anxious personality between QoL and DA, as well as the direct pathway from QoL to DA among caregivers. As the level of social support increased, the mediating effect of trait anxious personality and the direct effect of QoL on DA gradually weakened. According to the cognitive theory of Beck [36], stressors (such as QoL reduction) result in negative attitudes in the form of cognitive errors and dysfunction, leading to psychological distress, trait anxious personality, and DA. Multiple studies [24, 38, 39] have shown that social support can buffer psychological distress, trait anxious personality, and DA. According to the buffer model theory of social support [24], support from multiple sources (relatives, friends, neighbors, work partners, medical workers, and even strangers) can provide individuals with spiritual, emotional, and material care. This support helps the individual cope with stress and recover from fear of death [37,38,39]. Our results further found that social support moderated the relationship between trait anxious personality and DA. High levels of social support have a positive impact on trait anxiety personality, providing caregivers with confidence to overcome financial stress, care burden, and fear, and reduce psychological distress and DA. However, these correlations do not prove causal relationships. Thus, further research is warranted.
“It is important for future research to explore the mechanism between QoL and DA among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Medical staff should take into account death education [40, 41], mindfulness-based intervention [42] (such as meditation and laughter yoga), rational emotive hospice care therapy [4, 43], and spirituality support [44] as the main strategies to help caregivers find their meaning in life and improve their trait anxious personality and QoL to better deal with impending death. Society could introduce death education courses, integrating topics such as psychological relief knowledge, coping skills of death, help line, and how to ask for help into the curriculum [37,38,39]. By conducting psychographic painting therapy and creating support groups for caregivers, caregivers who have similar experiences can communicate with others, sharing anticancer experience and treatment mode, and help patients relieve pain and cope with death. Mental health service providers should conduct screening for DA among caregivers and give more psychological support.
Limitation
The present study had several limitations. First, the participants were recruited from one cancer center; sample representation had certain limitations. We should collect samples in different regions and hospitals of different levels in future research directions. Second, our study only investigated the DA of caregivers at a certain point in time and did not reflect the dynamic change of DA. The causal relationships among trait anxiety personality, social support, QoL, and DA were still not well demonstrated. A longitudinal study is necessary to explore the changing trajectory of caregivers’ DA. Finally, our study solely employs a quantitative research approach; qualitative research should be integrated for further research in this area.
Conclusion
QoL is negatively associated with DA, and this association is partially mediated by trait anxious personality. As the level of social support increased, the mediating effect of trait anxious personality and the direct effect of QoL on DA gradually weakened. Our study provides a basis for future psychological workers to systematically assess and intervene in caregivers’ DA. It is vital to improve the level of social support, improve the QoL and care, and reduce the trait anxious personality and DA of caregivers.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249
Holm M, Årestedt K, Öhlen J, Alvariza A (2020) Variations in grief, anxiety, depression, and health among family caregivers before and after the death of a close person in the context of palliative home care. Death Stud 44:531–539
Sharif Nia H, Lehto RH, Pahlevan Sharif S, Mashrouteh M, Goudarzian AH, Rahmatpour P, Torkmandi H, Yaghoobzadeh A (2021) A cross-cultural evaluation of the construct validity of Templer’s death anxiety scale: a systematic review. OMEGA J Death Dying 83:760–776
Onyechi KCN, Onuigbo LN, Eseadi C, Ikechukwu-Ilomuanya AB, Nwaubani OO, Umoke PC, Agu FU, Otu MS, Utoh-Ofong AN (2016) Effects of rational-emotive hospice care therapy on problematic assumptions, death anxiety, and psychological distress in a sample of cancer patients and their family caregivers in Nigeria. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:929
Litzelman K, Green PA, Yabroff KR (2016) Cancer and quality of life in spousal dyads: spillover in couples with and without cancer-related health problems. Support Care Cancer 24:763–771
Choi JY, Chang YJ, Song HY, Jho HJ, Lee MK (2013) Factors that affect quality of dying and death in terminal cancer patients on inpatient palliative care units: perspectives of bereaved family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 45:735–745
Uslu-Sahan F, Terzioglu F, Koc G (2019) Hopelessness, death anxiety, and social support of hospitalized patients with gynecologic cancer and their caregivers. Cancer Nurs 42:373–380
Alkan A, Köksoy EB, Karci E, Alkan A, Bruera E, Çay Şenler F (2020) Posttraumatic growth and death anxiety in caregivers of cancer patients: PHOENIX study. Turk J Med Sci 50:1364–1370
Soleimani MA, Lehto RH, Negarandeh R, Bahrami N, Chan YH (2017) Death anxiety and quality of life in Iranian caregivers of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 40:E1–E10
Sherman DW, Norman R, McSherry CB (2010) A comparison of death anxiety and quality of life of patients with advanced cancer or AIDS and their family caregivers. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 21:99–112
Suzuki M (2012) Quality of life, uncertainty, and perceived involvement in decision making in patients with head and neck cancer. Number 6 39:541–548
Furer P, Walker JR (2008) Death anxiety: a cognitive-behavioral approach. J Cogn Psychother 22(2):167–182
Brown AJ, Shen MJ, Ramondetta LM, Bodurka DC, Giuntoli RL, Diaz-Montes T (2014) Does death anxiety affect end-of-life care discussions? Int J Gynecol Cancer: Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24(8):1521
Sinoff, G (2017) Thanatophobia (death anxiety) in the elderly: the problem of the child’s inability to assess their own parent’s death anxiety state. Front Med 11
Lee HJ, Jo KH (2006) A path model for death anxiety to suicidal ideation of the elderly. J Korean Gerontol Soc 26:717–731
Egloff B, Hock M (2001) Interactive effects of state anxiety and trait anxiety on emotional Stroop interference. Pers Individ Dif 31:875–882
Spielberger CD (1966) Theory and research on anxiety. Anxiety Behav 1:413–428
Yıldız M, Bulut MB (2017) Relationship among death anxiety and personality traits[J]. Electron Turk Stud 12(13):659–676
Özdemir S, Kahraman S (2021) Ertufan H (2021) Comparison of death anxiety, self-esteem, and personality traits of the people who live in Turkey and Denmark. Omega (Westport) 84(2):360–377
Abdel-Khalek AM (2002) Death, anxiety, and depression: a comparison between Egyptian, Kuwaiti, and Lebanese undergraduates. OMEGA J Death Dying 45:277–287
Bovero A, Cotardo F, Pierotti V, Gottardo F, Botto R, Opezzo M, Geminiani GC (2021) Personality traits and sense of dignity in end-of-life cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 38(1):39–46
Uslu-Sahan F, Terzioglu F, Koc G (2019) Hopelessness, death anxiety, and social support of hospitalized patients with gynecologic cancer and their caregivers. Cancer Nurs 42(5):373–380
Scheffold K, Philipp R, Koranyi S, Engelmann D, Schulz-Kindermann F, Härter M, Mehnert A (2018) Insecure attachment predicts depression and death anxiety in advanced cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 16(3):308–316
Creswell KG, Cheng Y, Levine MD (2015) A test of the stress-buffering model of social support in smoking cessation: is the relationship between social support and time to relapse mediated by reduced withdrawal symptoms? Nicotine Tob Res 17:566–571
Templer DI (1970) The construction and validation of a death anxiety scale. J Gen Psychol 82:165–177
Soleimani MA, Bahrami N, Yaghoobzadeh A, Banihashemi H, Nia HS, Haghdoost AA (2016) Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Templer death anxiety scale in family caregivers of cancer patients. Iran J Nurs Midwif Res 21:284–290
Yang H, Han L, Guo H (2012) Study on the cross-cultural adjustment and application of the Death Anxiety Scale. Chin J Pract Nurs. 53–57
Whoqol Group (1995) The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41:1403–1409
Sjolander C, Rolander B, Järhult J, Mårtensson J, Ahlstrom G (2012) Health-related quality of life in family members of patients with an advanced cancer diagnosis: a one-year prospective study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 10:89
Xiao S (1994) Theoretical basis and research application of social support rating scale. J Clin Psychiatry 4(2):98
Li L, Zhu X, Yang C, Hu T, Zhao X, Li C, Wu M, Qiao G, Yang F (2021) Social support and coping style of tongqi in China: a cross-sectional study. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 35:317–322
Spielberger RL Gorsuch, Lushene RE (1970) State-trait anxiety inventory. palo Alto. Consulting Psychologists Press
Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach, 2nd edn. Guilford Press
Lau BHP, Wong DFK, Fung YL, Zhou J, Chan CLW, Chow AYM (2018) Facing death alone or together? Investigating the interdependence of death anxiety, dysfunctional attitudes, and quality of life in patient–caregiver dyads confronting lung cancer. Psychooncology 27:2045–2051
Lyon ME, Jacobs S, Briggs L, Cheng YI, Wang J (2014) A longitudinal, randomized, controlled trial of advance care planning for teens with cancer: anxiety, depression, quality of life, advance directives, spirituality. J Adolesc Health 54:710–717
Clak DA, Beck AT (1999) Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Bibi A, Khalid MA (2020) Death anxiety, perceived social support, and demographic correlates of patients with breast cancer in Pakistan. Death Stud 44:787–792
Götze H, Brähler E, Gansera L, Polze N, Köhler N (2014) Psychological distress and quality of life of palliative cancer patients and their caring relatives during home care. Support Care Cancer 22:2775–2782
Burnette D, Duci V, Dhembo E (2017) Psychological distress, social support, and quality of life among cancer caregivers in Albania. Psychooncology 26:779–786
Doka KJ (2015) Hannelore wass: death education—an enduring legacy. Death Stud 39(9):545–548
Wang T, Cheung K, Cheng H (2024) Death education interventions for people with advanced diseases and/or their family caregivers: a scoping review. Palliat Med 38(4):423–446
Kuru Alıcı N, Zorba Bahceli P, Emiroğlu ON (2018) The preliminary effects of laughter therapy on loneliness and death anxiety among older adults living in nursing homes: a nonrandomised pilot study. Int J Older People Nurs 13(4):e12206
Eseadi C (2019) Rational-emotive behavioral intervention helped patients with cancer and their caregivers to manage psychological distress and anxiety symptoms. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 10(2):62
Zhang JX, Peng JX, Gao P, Huang H, Cao Y, Zheng L, Miao D (2019) Relationship between meaning in life and death anxiety in the elderly: self-esteem as a mediator. BMC Geriatr 19(1):308
Funding
This research was supported by the Young Talents Training Foundation in Nursing of Sun Yat-sen University, China (grant no: N2022Y05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z. Zhou and Y. Li contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Y. Duan, Q. Zhao, and Y. Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Y. Li. Z. Zhou and Q. Zhao commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guang Zhou, China (No:SL-B2022-416–02). We certify that the study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and later amendments.
This study strictly follows the principle of informed consent of research subjects, explains the purpose, significance, benefits, and risks of the study in detail to the subjects, and informs about the principle of voluntariness and confidentiality. The study is conducted after subject consent is obtained and informed consent is signed.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ying, L., Yuyu, D., Qinqin, Z. et al. Quality of life and death anxiety among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: the mediating effect of trait anxious personality and the moderating effect of social support. Support Care Cancer 32, 471 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08653-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08653-6