Abstract
Background
Systematic lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer could be sufficiently and reproducibly achieved along the outermost layer of the autonomic nerves and similar concept has been extensively used for robotic esophagectomy (RE) since 2018. This study aimed to determine the surgical and oncological safety of RE using the outermost layer-oriented approach for esophageal cancer (EC).
Methods
Sixty-six patients who underwent RE with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy for primary EC between April 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All underwent the outermost layer-oriented approach with intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). Postoperative complications within 30 days were analyzed.
Results
Among the patients, 51 (77.3%) were male. The median age was 64 years, and the body mass index was 21.8 kg/m2. Furthermore, 58 (87.9%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma and eight (12.1%) patients had adenocarcinoma. Clinical stages I, II, and III were seen in 23 (34.8%), 23 (34.8%), and 16 (24.2%) patients, respectively. Thirty-four (51.5%) patients received preoperative treatment. No patient shifted to conventional thoracoscopic or open procedure intraoperatively. The median operative time was 716 min with 119 mL of blood loss. Additionally, 64 (97%) patients underwent R0 resection. The morbidity rates based on Clavien–Dindo grades ≥ II and ≥ IIIa were 30.3% and 10.6%, respectively, within 30 postoperative days. None died within 90 days postoperatively. Three (4.5%) patients exhibited recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy (CD grade ≥ II). The sensitivity and specificity of IONM for RLN palsy were 50% and 98.3% at the right RLN and 33.3% and 98.0% at the left RLN, respectively.
Conclusion
RE with the outermost layer-oriented approach can provide safe short-term outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy with or without cervical lymphadenectomy is used to treat esophageal cancer (EC) [1]. However, it has high postoperative morbidity and mortality because of the complex anatomy in the mediastinal area [2]. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that the minimally invasive approach led to improved pulmonary [3] and major postoperative complications [4] compared with the conventional thoracoscopic approach and open approach. The da Vinci™ Surgical System (DVSS; Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, USA) was developed to overcome the limitations of thoracoscopic/laparoscopic surgery, including the limited range of motion resulting from straight forceps use and hand tremors. Moreover, it facilitates safer, more precise, and more reproducible procedures by surgeons in a confined surgical field with impressive dexterity [5]. In 2009, we introduced robotic esophagectomy (RE) using the DVSS and found that it led to reduced recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy [6]. However, the benefits of RE remain unknown.
We established the outermost layer (OL)-oriented nodal dissection in a minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer, which could achieve favorable surgical and oncological outcomes, especially in robotic gastrectomy [5, 7,8,9]. In this approach, the thin loose connective tissue layer (termed as the OL of the autonomic nerve) between the autonomic nerve sheaths of the major arteries and the adipose tissue bearing lymphatic tissue is dissected. Based on our experience in using this technique and our understanding that this OL can be identified along the autonomic nerves (including the vagus nerve and RLNs present around the major mediastinal anatomical structures containing trachea, bronchi, pericardium, aortic arch, and subclavian arteries), we hypothesized that this OL-oriented approach can help surgeons determine ventrolateral border of mediastinal lymphadenectomy and perform RE for EC safely and reproducibly in the same manner as gastrectomy.
Since the Japanese government approved the national medical insurance coverage in April 2018, RE has been the first surgical treatment option for EC in our institution. The development of DVSS-Xi™ and approval of the national medical insurance coverage facilitated the standardization of the RE procedure [10]. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the robotic system with the OL-oriented approach has clinical advantages for technically demanding procedures such as RE. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes including postoperative morbidity of RE using the OL-oriented approach for EC.
Materials and methods
Patients
After obtaining approval from the Fujita Health University Review Board, patients from a prospectively maintained institutional database were identified. Ninety-six consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary EC in our institute between April 2018 and December 2021 were included. Patients with clinical T4 tumor, severe intrathoracic adhesion, and one-lung ventilation failure are considered contraindications for the robotic transthoracic approach. Patients with clinical T4 are considered an indication for two-stage resection if downstaging to clinical T ≤ 3 is obtained after induction chemo- or chemoradiotherapy. After excluding 30 patients, 66 patients who underwent RE with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy were analyzed (Fig. 1).
The database and medical records were used to collect demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, treatment information, and follow-up information. Cancer was staged according to the 11th edition of the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer [11] and the findings of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, positron emission scanning, esophagogastrography, endoscopic study, and endosonography before any treatment initiation. The indications for endoscopic treatment and radical esophagectomy, including the extent of lymph node dissection, were determined according to the Japanese Esophageal Cancer Treatment Guidelines [12, 13]. The assessment and criteria of physical function for RE were previously described [6]. Patients with clinical T stage ≥ 2 and/or positive clinical N status were generally offered neoadjuvant treatment [11, 14]. The neoadjuvant treatment regimen was selected according to the guideline recommendations. Subtotal esophagectomy (Mckeown procedure) with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy was indicated for all patients with EC. Bilateral supraclavicular lymph node (station 104) dissection was indicated for patients with EC at the upper esophagus or clinical T ≥ 2 tumor at the middle esophagus. Two-stage resection was recommended for patients with poor systemic function and those after undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. All operations were supervised by IU and performed by IU, KS, or SS, who had obtained the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery’s Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification [15, 16]. All procedures were also video recorded and reviewed by independent surgeons (MN and TT) to confirm the completion of the OL-oriented approach.
The morbidity rate within 30 days postoperatively was the primary outcome. The Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification was used to classify postoperative complications [17]. An otolaryngologist evaluated patients’ vocal cord movement preoperatively and seven days after surgery. The time from the start of chest incision to the completion of trocar site closure on the chest was defined as the thoracic operative time during the thoracic phase.
Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM)
RLN function was routinely monitored intraoperatively via IONM (NIM TriVantage™, Medtronic, Jacksonville, FL, USA) to identify the bilateral RLNs and confirm their function before, during and after nodal dissection. Muscle relaxants were not administered to maintain vocal cord activity, which was monitored by IONM during the thoracic phase of the surgery. Neural stimulation was performed with a monopolar stimulator, usually with currents of 1.0 mA. Loss of signal was confirmed when no electromyogram activity or substantially reduced activity (< 100 mV) was produced via RLN and vagus nerve stimulation.
Operative procedure
Setting
The patient was placed in a semi-prone position. After placing five trocars at the right thorax (Fig. 2), the patient cart was docked, targeting the caudal edge of the azygos arch. The surgical procedures are detailed in Supplemental Video 1.
OL in the posterior mediastinum
Figure 3 shows the OL in the posterior mediastinum. Autonomic fibers including vagus nerves and RLNs are distributed around major anatomical structures, including bilateral subclavian arteries, aortic arch, trachea, bronchi, and pericardium. These autonomic fibers are wrapped by a loose connective tissue (OL layer), and the lymph nodes to be dissected are located outside of this tissue. The ventrolateral border can be identified in mediastinal lymphadenectomy, including lymph nodes along RLNs (106recR and 106recL), by dissecting along the OL (Fig. 3).
Mobilization of the middle and lower mesoesophagus and dissection of the lower mediastinal lymph node
The ventral aspect of the lower and middle thoracic esophagus with the adipose tissue bearing posterior mediastinal nodes (station 112) was mobilized on the OL of the pericardium (Fig. 4a). The dorsal aspect was mobilized on the dissectable layer, preserving the thoracic duct (Fig. 4b). Then, the supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes (station 111) were dissected along the diaphragmatic crus.
Middle mediastinal lymph node dissection
The subcarinal nodes (station 107 + 109) was dissected on the OL of the pericardium, while the cranial edge of the pulmonary veins was exposed. By keeping on dissecting the station 109L nodes on this layer, the membranous portion of the left main bronchus became evident (Fig. 5a). The upper thoracic paraesophageal lymph nodes (station 105) were dissected on the OL of the right main bronchus along the pulmonary branches of the right vagus nerve, exposing the main trunk of the right vagus nerve behind the azygos arch. Then, the station 109R nodes were dissected on the OL of the right main bronchus along the pulmonary branches of the right vagus nerve (Fig. 5b). The esophageal branches of the right vagus nerve were transected at each origin. The upper thoracic esophagus was mobilized on the OL of the tracheal carina. Meanwhile, the distal side of the right bronchial artery was divided. Finally, the ventral border of the subcarinal lymph nodes (station 107) was determined.
Mobilization of the upper esophagus along the OL
Three independent dissectable layers were identified as landmarks for mobilization of the dorsal aspect of the upper esophagus (Supplemental Fig. 1). After transecting the azygos arch, the ventral aspect of the upper esophagus was mobilized on the OL of the trachea along the right vagus nerve and the right RLN was identified on the right subclavian artery (Fig. 6). Mobilization of the dorsal aspect of the upper esophagus is performed as shown in supplemental Fig. 2.
Dissection of the recurrent nerve and cervical paraesophageal lymph nodes
The right upper mediastinal periesophageal tissue was mobilized on the OL of the trachea. The lateroventral border of the lymph nodes around the right RLN (station 106recR + 101R) was defined on the OL of the right subclavian artery and carotid artery along the right RLN (Fig. 7). The right RLN was not detached from the right subclavian artery to avoid postoperative right RLN palsy. The bottom of the station 106recR + 101R was determined by dividing the lymphatic connection between station 106recR + 101R and the pretracheal lymph nodes (station 106pre). Next, the ventromedial aspect of the left upper esophagus with the mediastinal periesophageal tissue was mobilized on the outermost layer of the trachea. Then, the upper esophagus was transected using a 45-mm linear stapler at the aortic arch level. Subsequently, the left upper periesophageal tissue was detached from the upper esophagus up to the top of the left cervical paraesophageal lymph nodes (station 101L). The adipose tissue including the left recurrent nerve lymph nodes (station 106recL) + 101L nodes was dissected on the dissectable layer along the left RLN (the OL of the aortic arch and the left subclavian artery) (Fig. 8). Then, the lymphatic connection between station 106recL + 101L and station 106pre was transected. Finally, the lateral aspect of station 106recL + 101L was dissected in the craniocaudal direction.
Dissection of tracheobronchial and posterior mediastinal lymph nodes
The tracheobronchial nodes (station 106tbL) were dissected on the face of the pulmonary artery trunk, preserving the recurrent portion of the left RLN along the OL of the aortic arch (Fig. 9). Then, the esophageal branches of the left vagus nerve were dissected below the left main bronchus, preserving the left pulmonary branches. Finally, the posterior mediastinal nodes (station 112) were dissected together with the left mediastinal pleura and the left inferior pulmonary ligament, and the thoracic phase of RE was completed.
Stomach mobilization, abdominal lymph node dissection, and reconstruction
In the supine position, the stomach was mobilized robotically in the same manner as robotic proximal gastrectomy as previously described [18, 19]. A 3.5-cm-wide greater curvature gastric conduit was extracorporeally created and pulled up through the retrosternal route. Generally, subtotal esophagectomy is performed and esophagogastrostomy is made through end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler at 20 cm from the incisor [20].
Data and statistical analysis
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified. Clinical staging, including T and N status, was determined before initiation of any treatment. The inspection accuracy of IONM was defined as follows: sensitivity, number of IONM-positive cases (loss of signal) among all cases with RLN paralysis; specificity, number of IONM-negative cases among all cases without RLN paralysis; positive predictive value (PPV), percentage of cases with postoperative RLN paralysis among all cases with RLN paralysis estimated by IONM; and negative predictive value (NPV), percentage of cases without postoperative RLN paralysis among all cases without RLN paralysis estimated by IONM. All statistical data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics
The demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of 66 patients included in this study are listed in Table 1. Fifty-eight (87.9%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical stages I, II, and III were seen in 23 (34.8%), 23 (34.8%), and 16 (24.2%) patients, respectively. Furthermore, 34 (51.5%) patients received preoperative treatment (Table 1).
Surgical and pathological outcomes
The surgical and pathological outcomes are shown in Table 2. None of the patients converted to conventional thoracoscopic or open procedure intraoperatively. The median operative time was 716 min, with 119 mL of blood loss. Moreover, R0 resection was performed in 64 (97%) patients (Table 2). The median number of dissected nodes was 47 overall and 20 in the thoracic field. In addition, 27 (40.9%) patients had pathological T ≥ 2 and 17 (25.8%) patients had positive nodes. The video record confirmed that the OL-oriented dissection in the thoracic procedure was completed in all patients.
Postoperative short-term outcomes
Postoperative short-term outcomes are shown in Table 3. The morbidity rates of CD grade ≥ II and severe morbidity rates of CD grade ≥ IIIa were 30.3% and 10.6%, respectively, within 30 days postoperatively. The incidence of pneumonia (CD grade ≥ II) was 15.2%. Additionally, anastomotic leakage (CD grade ≥ II) occurred in three (4.5%) patients. No one died within 90 days postoperatively. RLN palsy (CD grade ≥ II) occurred in three (4.5%) patients. CD grades I, II, and IIIa were seen in 8 (12.1%), 2 (3.0%), and 1 (1.5%) patient, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of IONM for RLN palsy were 50%, 98.3%, 50%, and 98.3% in the right RLN and 33.3%, 98.0%, 75%, and 89.3% in the left RLN, respectively (Table 4).
Discussion
The OL-oriented approach for RE was found to be safe and feasible for EC, with 10.6% of CD grade ≥ IIIa morbidity rates, 4.5% of RLN palsy (CD grade ≥ II) incidence, 47 dissected lymph nodes, and no mortality. The video review confirmed that the procedure was completed in all cases, indicating that this approach is highly reproducible.
Considering the complex anatomy involved in esophagectomy combined with mediastinal lymphadenectomy, several studies have reported surgical approaches of esophagectomy according to anatomical landmarks [21,22,23,24,25]. Cuesta et al. retrospectively reviewed 35 patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy and reported a new concept of surgical anatomy called “mesoesophagus.” They found a thin connective tissue along the dissected aspect in the upper, middle, and lower mediastinal area, and the esophagus with esophageal vessels and lymph nodes that should be dissected was mobilized as the “mesoesophagus” similarly in rectal cancer surgery [21]. In addition, Fujiwara et al. introduced a concentric three-layer model, consisting of the visceral, vascular, and parietal layers, with a loose connective tissue between them, based on human embryonic development. They reported that this method improved the operative time and postoperative RLN palsy [23]. Thus, resection based on the theory of the detachable layer has become popular in EC surgery. Collectively, these anatomical studies have made it possible to mesenterize the dorsal aspect of the esophagus. In the present study, the OL of the autonomic nerves surrounding the major anatomical structures in the mediastinum might be the definite dissectable layer, which divides the esophagus with regional lymph nodes from the organs and tissues that should be preserved in the visceral layer of the concentric three-layer model (Supplemental Fig. 3). Our OL-oriented approach is more comprehensive and practical based on the following points: (1) The nerve fibers, including the bilateral vagus nerves, RLNs, and their branches surrounding the trachea, bronchi, pericardium, and major vessels, are easily detected and traced. (2) The dissection along the nerve network divides the visceral layer of the concentric three-layer method and leads to easy, safe, and reproducible mobilization of the esophagus with adipose tissue bearing reginal lymph nodes, preserving the surrounding anatomical structures. (3) This method enables to preserve the bilateral RLNs together with the thin membranous tissue covering the nerves, which may help prevent intraoperative physical injuries to the RLNs.
In addition, 30.3% and 10.6% of our patients had CD grade ≥ II and ≥ IIIa complications, respectively. In previous studies, the postoperative morbidity (CD grade ≥ II) ranged from 19.2 to 66% [25,26,27,28,29]. Complications such as anastomotic leakage and pneumonia have an incidence of 3.6–33% and 4.8–33%, respectively [25,26,27,28,29]. In the ROBOT trial, Van der Sluis et al. compared the short-term outcomes between RE and the open approach for patients with intrathoracic EC; the RE group showed fewer postoperative complications (CD grade ≥ II, 59% vs. 80%) and pneumonia (28% vs. 55%) [30]. The recent RAMIE trial showed comparable incidence of postoperative major complications (CD grade ≥ III, 12.2% vs. 10.2%) and pulmonary complications (13.8% vs. 14.7%) in the robotic and laparoscopic approach [29]. The postoperative morbidity rates in the present study including anastomotic leakage and pneumonia were comparable or even better than those in the aforementioned retrospective studies and RCTs, indicating that our methodology is feasible and safe.
The incidence of RLN palsy (CD grade ≥ II) associated with our method was 4.5%. Upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy including the lymph nodes along the bilateral RLNs is essential in radical surgery for esophageal squamous carcinoma [1]. Akiyama et al. reported that the RLN palsy rate was 38.1% in patients who underwent open esophagectomy for EC [31]. A minimally invasive approach improves the incidence of RLN palsy, ranging from 2.4 to 29.2% in previous studies for RE with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy [25,26,27, 30, 32]. Although the aforementioned RCT reported a similar incidence between the robotic and thoracoscopic approaches (27.1% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.258), Fujita et al. reported better outcomes in RE (8.0% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.01) [33]. Several studies reported that IONM helped identify RLNs intraoperatively and reduce RLN palsy in esophagectomy with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy [34,35,36,37], although no study has reported the effect of IONM on RE. The present study indicated that the combined application of our OL-oriented approach using the DVSS, which may reduce physical traction and heat given to RLNs and IONM in RE could help reduce RLN palsy. In addition, IONM could well predict RLN palsy. The specificity and NPV were reported to be 54.8–100% and 68–96.6%, respectively [37], consistent with those in our study. The lower NPV at the left side (89.3% vs. 98.3%) might be due to injury of the left RLN during the creation of left neck anastomosis, as supported by an RCT comparing intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy without upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy; in this RCT, the RLN palsy rate was 7.3% in the cervical anastomosis group [38].
However, this study has several limitations. This study has a single-center, retrospective, and noncomparable design. Although we applied the robotic approach to all surgery-eligible patients with EC during the study period, selection bias was inherent considering the retrospective nature of the study. This study also focused on the short-term outcomes with a relatively small sample size, which may influence the outcomes. To validate the advantages of our OL-oriented approach, oncological long-term evaluation with more cases are needed, although the number of dissected lymph nodes in this study was at least comparable with those of previous reports [26].
In conclusion, RE with the OL-oriented approach can provide safe short-term outcomes.
Abbreviations
- EC:
-
Esophageal cancer
- RCTs:
-
Randomized controlled trials
- DVSS:
-
Da Vinci Surgical System
- RE:
-
Robotic esophagectomy
- OL:
-
Outermost layer
- RLN:
-
Recurrent laryngeal nerve
- CD:
-
Clavien–Dindo
- IONM:
-
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
- ICS:
-
Intercostal space
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
References
Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Tanaka T, Shirouzu K (2002) Three-field dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 8:328–335
Cuesta MA, van der Wielen N, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, Gisbertz SS, van Duijvendijk P, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL (2017) Surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus based on a minimally invasive approach: vascular and nervous anatomy and technical steps to resection and lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 31:1863–1870
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 379:1887–1892
Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D, D’Journo XB, Brigand C, Perniceni T, Carrere N, Mabrut JY, Msika S, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Bonnetain F, Piessen G, Federation de Rechercheen C, French Eso-Gastric Tumors Working G (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380:152–162
Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2016) Robotic surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: current status and future perspectives. Dig Endosc 28:701–713
Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Inaba K, Kanaya S, Teramukai S, Satoh S, Uyama I (2012) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 36:1608–1616
Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, Kinoshita T, Noshiro H, Takiguchi S, Ehara K, Obama K, Kuwabara S, Okabe H, Terashima M (2019) Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 22:377–385
Suda K, Sakai M, Obama K, Yoda Y, Shibasaki S, Tanaka T, Nakauchi M, Hisamori S, Nishigori T, Igarashi A, Noshiro H, Terashima M, Uyama I (2022) Three-year outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective comparative study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09802-w
Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Suda K, Satoh S (2012) Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: technique and initial experience. World J Surg 36:331–337
Kikuchi K, Suda K, Shibasaki S, Tanaka T, Uyama I (2021) Challenges in improving the minimal invasiveness of the surgical treatment for gastric cancer using robotic technology. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5:604–613
Japan Esophageal S (2017) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus 14:1–36
Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Kuwano H, Takeuchi H, Toh Y, Doki Y, Naomoto Y, Nemoto K, Booka E, Matsubara H, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yanagisawa A, Yoshida M (2019) Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 1. Esophagus 16:1–24
Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Kuwano H, Takeuchi H, Toh Y, Doki Y, Naomoto Y, Nemoto K, Booka E, Matsubara H, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yanagisawa A, Yoshida M (2019) Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2. Esophagus 16:25–43
Japan Esophageal S (2017) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part II and III. Esophagus 14:37–65
Shibasaki S, Suda K, Kadoya S, Ishida Y, Nakauchi M, Nakamura K, Akimoto S, Tanaka T, Kikuchi K, Inaba K, Uyama I (2022) The safe performance of robotic gastrectomy by second-generation surgeons meeting the operating surgeon’s criteria in the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery guidelines. Asian J Endosc Surg 15:70–81
Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M (2010) Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:18–23
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Shibasaki S, Suda K, Nakauchi M, Kikuchi K, Kadoya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Uyama I (2017) Robotic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using double flap technique following proximal gastrectomy: technical aspects and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 31:4283–4297
Matsuo K, Shibasaki S, Suzuki K, Serizawa A, Akimoto S, Nakauchi M, Tanaka T, Inaba K, Uyama I, Suda K (2022) Efficacy of minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy followed by valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy using the double flap technique in preventing reflux oesophagitis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09840-4,Dec272022
Goto A, Tanaka T, Shibasaki S, Nakauchi M, Nakamura K, Akimoto S, Kikuchi K, Inaba K, Uyama I, Suda K (2023) Circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy using the keyhole procedure after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Esophagus 20:63–71
Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL (2015) A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2576–2582
Tokairin Y, Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Hoshino A, Okada T, Ryotokuji T, Okuda M, Kume Y, Kawamura Y, Yamaguchi K, Nagai K, Akita K, Kinugasa Y (2018) Histological study of the thin membranous structure made of dense connective tissue around the esophagus in the upper mediastinum. Esophagus 15:272–280
Fujiwara H, Kanamori J, Nakajima Y, Kawano T, Miura A, Fujita T, Akita K, Daiko H (2019) An anatomical hypothesis: a “concentric-structured model” for the theoretical understanding of the surgical anatomy in the upper mediastinum required for esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy119
Tsunoda S, Shinohara H, Kanaya S, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Obama K, Hosogi H, Hisamori S, Sakai Y (2020) Mesenteric excision of upper esophagus: a concept for rational anatomical lymphadenectomy of the recurrent laryngeal nodes in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 34:133–141
Puntambekar S, Kenawadekar R, Kumar S, Joshi S, Agarwal G, Reddy S, Mallik J (2015) Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy. BMC Surg 15:47
Yang Y, Zhang X, Li B, Hua R, Yang Y, He Y, Ye B, Guo X, Sun Y, Li Z (2020) Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doz080
Kingma BF, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Chao YK, Tsai CY, Fuchs HF, Bruns CJ, Sarkaria IS, Luketich JD, Haveman JW, van Etten B, Chiu PW, Chan SM, Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Holzen JP, Sallum RA, Cecconello I, Egberts JH, Benedix F, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Perez D, Jansen K, Hubka M, Low DE, Biebl M, Pratschke J, Turner P, Pursnani K, Chaudry A, Smith M, Mazza E, Strignano P, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, Group US (2020) Worldwide techniques and outcomes in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from the multicenter international registry. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004550
van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, Borel Rinkes IH, Ten Kate FJ, van Hillegersberg R (2015) Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S1350–S1356
Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, Hua R, Chen H, Tan L, Li H, He Y, Guo X, Sun Y, Yu B, Li Z (2022) Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 275:646–653
van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, Kroese CC, Haj Mohammad N, Mook S, Vleggaar FP, Borel Rinkes IHM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2019) Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:621–630
Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–372 (discussion 372–363)
Park SY, Kim DJ, Yu WS, Jung HS (2016) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy: experience with 114 consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 29:326–332
Fujita T, Sato K, Ozaki A, Akutsu T, Fujiwara H, Kojima T, Daiko H (2022) Propensity-matched analysis of the short-term outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06567-0
Wong IYH, Zhang RQ, Tsang RKY, Kwok JYY, Wong CLY, Chan DKK, Chan FSY, Law SYK (2021) Improving outcome of superior mediastinal lymph node dissection during esophagectomy: a novel approach combining continuous and intermittent recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. Ann Surg 274:736–742
Yuda M, Nishikawa K, Ishikawa Y, Takahashi K, Kurogochi T, Tanaka Y, Matsumoto A, Tanishima Y, Mitsumori N, Ikegami T (2022) Intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy reduces the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Surg Endosc 36:3957–3964
Zhao L, He J, Qin Y, Liu H, Li S, Han Z, Li L (2022) Application of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerves in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doab080
Wang X, Guo H, Hu Q, Ying Y, Chen B (2021) Efficacy of intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 8:773579
van Workum F, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, Bouwense SAW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Gisbertz SS, Hannink G, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Jansen W, Kouwenhoven EA, van Lanschot JJB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van der Peet DL, Polat F, Ubels S, Wijnhoven BPL, Rovers MM, Rosman C, Group Icr (2021) Intrathoracic vs cervical anastomosis after totally or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 156:601–610
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank MARUZEN-YUSHODO Co., Ltd. (https://kw.maruzen.co.jp/kousei-honyaku/) for the English language editing.
Funding
This work was not supported by any grants or funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have fully satisfied the ICMJE authorship criteria as detailed in the following: Study design: MN, SS, IU, and KS; Data collection: MN, SS, AS, KS, and TT; Statistical analysis and interpretation of results: MN, SS, SA, KI, and KS; Drafting of the manuscript: MN, SS, and KS; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: IU and KS. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and are accountable for all aspects of the work, particularly in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Ichiro Uyama has received lecture fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., outside of the submitted work. Ichiro Uyama have been funded by Medicaroid, Inc. in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University. Koichi Suda has been funded by Sysmex, Co. in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University, and has also received advisory fees from Medicaroid, Inc., outside of the submitted work. Masaya Nakauchi, Susumu Shibasaki, Kazumitsu Suzuki, Akiko Serizawa, Shingo Akimoto, Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Kazuki Inaba, Ichiro Uyama, and Koichi Suda have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
464_2023_10437_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg
Supplementary file1 (JPEG 124 KB)—Three independent dissectible layers were regarded as landmarks to mobilize the esophagus: (1) layer along the aortic adventitia (blue triangle), (2) layer along the adipose tissue surrounding the thoracic duct (yellow triangle), and (3) interpleural ligament (Morosow’s ligament) (red triangle).
464_2023_10437_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg
Supplementary file2 (JPEG 88 KB)—The dorsal aspect of the upper esophagus was mobilized on the interpleural fascia in a caudocranial direction beyond the thoracic inlet. Then, the interpleural fascia was dissected from the adipose tissue surrounding the thoracic duct along the left aspect of the upper esophagus, and the dorsolateral aspect of the left upper mediastinal periesophageal tissue was sufficiently mobilized (green area).
Supplementary file3 (MP4 273392 KB)—Surgical procedures of the outermost layer-oriented approach.
464_2023_10437_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg
Supplementary file4 (JPEG 121 KB)—Outermost layer in the concentric-structured model. The outermost layer is shown in the purple line and dividing line between station 106rec and 106pre (green arrow).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakauchi, M., Shibasaki, S., Suzuki, K. et al. Robotic esophagectomy with outermost layer-oriented dissection for esophageal cancer: technical aspects and a retrospective review of a single-institution database. Surg Endosc 37, 8879–8891 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10437-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10437-8