Abstract
Rhipicephalus annulatus is a tick species of veterinary importance due to its potential to transmit babesiosis to cattle. This species has a Holarctic distribution with some Afrotropical records and is one-host species of veterinary importance. This study was carried out from September 2021 to February 2022 at 6 Egyptian collection sites, and a total of 1150 cattle were scanned randomly to collect ticks. A total of 1095 tick specimens were collected and identified as R. annulatus using taxonomic keys. Males were found on all parts of the cattle except the head and around the eyes, but females were found on all parts; in addition, the highest number of specimens was gathered from the udder, (neck and chest), and belly. Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling was used to predict the potential global distribution of R. annulatus. The MaxEnt model performed better than random with an average test area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.96, and model predictions were significantly better than random and gave (AUC) ratios above the null expectations in the partial receiver operating characteristic (pROC) analyses (P < 0.001). Based on correlation analyses, a set of 9 variables was selected for species from 15 bioclimatic and 5 normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) variables. The study showed that the current distribution of R. annulatus is estimated to occur across Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and North America. Annual mean temperature (Bio1) and median NDVI had the highest effect on the distribution of this species. The environmentally suitable habitat for R. annulatus sharply increased with increasing annual mean temperature (Bio1). These results can be used for making effective control planning decisions in areas suitable to this vector of many diseases worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Rhipicephalus annulatus (Say, 1821) is known as a cattle tick and could be considered a one-host tick in the genus Rhipicephalus; however, it is also collected from horses, sheep, goats, deer, and wild ungulates (Walker et al. 2003; Guglielmone et al. 2014). This species formerly belonged to the genus Boophilus until Murrell and Barker (2003) transferred it to the genus Rhipicephalus. This species is considered the vector for many diseases, such as bovine babesiosis (cattle fever) and bovine anaplasmosis (Samish et al. 1993; Miller et al. 2012). These protozoan and bacterial diseases are a significant threat to the cattle and beef industries and decrease meat and milk production (McCosker 1981; Bock et al. 2004). In Egypt, this species is distributed in different ecological zones and is considered the most important tick-infesting cattle throughout the country (Okely et al. 2021). Several pathogens were detected in this species from Egypt, such as CCHFV, lumpy skin disease virus, Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp., Borrelia spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Babesia spp. (Okely et al. 2022).
In terms of global geographic distribution, R. annulatus has a high abundance in tropical and subtropical regions (Graham and Price 1966; Estrada-Peña et al. 2006; Popara et al. 2013; Klafke et al. 2020). This tick is found in parts of Africa with Mediterranean and savanna climates, southern countries of the former USSR, Southern and Western Europe, in the Near and the Middle East, South America, and Mexico and may be found in Texas or California (Hoogstraal 1956; Jongejan and Uilenberg 2004). The USA carried out eradication programs between 1906 and 1943 to eliminate R. annulatus, but recently, this vector has re-emerged again as a direct threat to cattle throughout the country (Lohmeyer et al. 2011; Giles et al. 2014).
There is an increasing need to understand the distribution pattern of vectors and species transmitting specific diseases (Peterson et al. 2004). In recent years, many studies have predicted the potential distribution of tick vectors using ecological niche modeling (Raghavan et al. 2016; Kessler et al. 2019; Pascoe et al. 2019; Boorgula et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2021).
Previous studies have mapped the distribution of R. annulatus at local and regional levels. For Mediterranean countries, two studies focused on the distribution of this species by conducting environmental niche modeling (Estrada-Peña and Venzal 2007; Williams et al. 2015). In addition, one study focused on the distribution of this species on the island of Sicily (Torina et al. 2008). Other studies have estimated the habitat suitability for R. annulatus in the USA and Mexico (Estrada-Peña and Venzal 2006; Giles et al. 2014). To date, no study has evaluated the potential global distribution of this species.
Therefore, this work aims to survey R. annulatus in Egypt, in addition to estimating the potential distribution of this vector using an ecological niche modeling approach via the maximum entropy algorithm (MaxEnt).
Materials and methods
Sample collection
R. annulatus (n = 1095) was collected from September 2021 to February 2022 from a total of 6 collection stations in Egypt. A total of 1150 cattle were examined to collect ticks. Samples were preserved in vials containing 70% alcohol + 20% glycerol. Each vial was specific to an individual collection site and assigned information that indicated the site of collection, host, and GPS coordinates for each site.
Sample identification and mapping
Collected samples were identified in the laboratory using the appropriate taxonomic keys (Hoogstraal 1956; Walker et al. 2003; Okely et al. 2021). All specimens are preserved in the Ain Shams University tick collection. The sample collection locations were georeferenced using the ArcGIS software, version 10.3 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA).
Occurrence records
Primary occurrence records for R. annulatus were obtained from VectorMap (www.vectormap.org), previous literature (Loftis et al. 2006; Hassan et al. 2017; Aboelhadid et al. 2018; Okely et al. 2021), and field surveillance conducted by the first author. All records were included with geographic coordinates in the final dataset. Unique records were used in the final occurrence records by removing the duplicate records. We filtered these occurrences depending on a distance filter to remove all redundant records occurring in a single 2.5’ pixel (~ 5 km) (Syfert et al. 2013). The final dataset was divided into two halves: 50% for calibrating the model and 50% for evaluating the model prediction.
Bioclimatic variables
Data from WorldClim (www.worldclim.org), including 19 bioclimatic variables, were used to assess the potential distribution; bio 8–9 and 18–19 were not used in the analyses due to spatial artifacts in these variables (Nasser et al. 2021). In addition to bioclimatic data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data were incorporated into the analysis. Monthly NDVI data values from 2012 to 2018 were averaged into the mean, median, minimum, maximum, and range using the Spatial Analyst tools function in ArcMap v10.3 (Okely et al. 2020a). All bioclimatic variables and 5 NDVI variables (Table 1) were submitted to a principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the significant correlations among some of these variables (Kriticos et al. 2014). The first 6 principal components summarized approximately 99% of the overall variance and were used as components in our analyses.
Ecological niche modeling
The ecological niche of R. annulatus was predicted using the maximum entropy algorithm implemented in MaxEnt v3.3.3e (Phillips et al. 2006). MaxEnt estimates environmentally suitable habitats for species that vary from 0 (lowest suitability) to 1 (highest suitability) (Nasser et al. 2019). Additionally, response curves were generated for each variable. Finally, MaxEnt produced a jackknife to estimate the most important set of variables that had a greater contribution to species distribution (Khanum et al. 2013; Okely et al. 2020b). The current 15 bioclimatic and 5 NDVI variables were reduced to fewer variables after undergoing the test in SDMTools in ArcGIS 10.3 (Universal tool; Remove highly correlated variables) to remove variables with high correlations among them (Graham 2003). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used with r > 0.7 as a cutoff threshold to determine the highly correlated variables (Dormann et al. 2013). The final set of nine variables was used in our analysis (Table 2). The calibration area (M) was estimated (Fig. 1) (Soberon and Peterson 2005; Barve et al. 2011) to project the model for the Old World, South America, and North America. The bootstrap function in MaxEnt was used to create 100 replicates for model analyses. To estimate the perfect model of R. annulatus, median values across all replicates were selected. The final model was thresholded to define habitat and nonhabitats (or unsuitable areas) for species based on a maximum allowable omission error rate of 5% (E = 5%) (Peterson et al. 2008). We identified type I novelty (analogous and nonanalogous environments) in the study area by comparing accessible area data vs. study area data using the extrapolation detection software Exdet tool V1.1 (Mesgaran et al. 2014).
Model evaluation
The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. AUC is a measure of model performance and varies from random discrimination to perfect discrimination (Swets 1988). Additionally, our model was evaluated using the partial receiver operating characteristic (pROC) function in the ENMGadgets package in R (Peterson et al. 2011). We chose pROC for testing the model to prevent errors obtained from the traditional ROC (Lobo et al. 2008).
Results
Overall, 16 nymphs, 76 males, and 1003 females were collected and identified as R. annulatus from 6 collection sites in Egypt. The sex ratio between males and females was 0.075:1. The individual geographic collection locations for previous literature data, vector map data, and new field surveys were georeferenced and are displayed in Fig. 2.
The distribution of R. annulatus on different body parts of the cattle varied among nymphs, males, and females (Fig. 3). Nymphs were found only at three sites. Males were found on all parts except the head and around the eye, but they were collected more from the anus and under the tail than from other sites. On the other hand, females were found on all parts, and the highest number of specimens was gathered from the udder, neck, chest, and belly (Fig. 3). More than half of the females were semiengorged, followed by fully engorged females, and unfed females were collected throughout the study (Fig. 4).
The MaxEnt model for R. annulatus gave satisfactory results with an AUC value of 0.96, and model predictions were significantly better than random values and gave (AUC) ratios above the null expectations in the pROC analyses (P < 0.001), where the minimum, maximum, and mean pROC values were 1.69, 1.92, and 1.85, respectively. Annual mean temperature (Bio1) and median NDVI were the most important predictors of R. annulatus habitat distribution (Fig. 5); these factors had the highest influence on the model, with contributions of 30.2 and 20.5%, respectively (Table 2). The probability of the presence of R. annulatus increased with an increase in annual mean temperature (Bio1); additionally, the suitability of habitat for this species increased with the increase in annual precipitation (Bio12) (Fig. 6). R. annulatus increased their distribution in suitable a habitat with a low-median NDVI value and decreased their distribution in a habitat with a high-median NDVI value (Fig. 6).
The potential distribution of R. annulatus was estimated across Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and North America. In Asia, the predicted distributional potential of this vector in Western Asia included Turkey, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Iran, and the Arabian Peninsula (Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates). R. annulatus was also predicted to occur in Pakistan, India, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and China (Fig. 7). In Africa, the environmentally suitable areas for R. annulatus included Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco in North Africa, South Sudan and Sub-Saharan countries; however, its distributional potential is very limited in South Africa (Fig. 7).
In Europe, R. annulatus was predicted to occur in Spain, Portugal, Southern Italy, Sicily Island, Greece, some parts of Poland, Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Romania (Fig. 7). In the USA on the Atlantic coast, suitable habitat for this vector species was observed in much of South America in Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Venezuela, and Argentina, and the environmentally suitable areas of R. annulatus included Central America and the Caribbean islands. In North America, suitable habitat was mainly in Mexico and the western parts of the USA, including South Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, and Washington (Fig. 8).
The ExDet tool detected climatic novelty in our analysis for R. annulatus in Russia and North Canada and showed pixels corresponding to climatic novelty in Latin America and India (Fig. 9).
Discussion
According to previous literature (Hoogstraal and Kaiser 1960; Shoukry et al. 1993; El Kammah et al. 2001; Mazyad and Khalaf 2002; Okely et al. 2022) and our own observations, R. annulatus is considered the most abundant tick infesting cattle in Egypt. In this study, in comparison with the number of males, a large number of females were collected. This was probably due to technical limitations, as the males were very small, and it was difficult to collect such samples compared to females; these findings agreed with those of previous studies (Lorusso et al. 2013; Kerario et al. 2017; Okely et al. 2021).
Our observations demonstrated that R. annulatus was collected from all the body sites of cattle, which agreed with the results of Gabaj et al. (1992). R. annulatus was collected mostly from the udder, neck, chest, and legs of the cattle, and these sites were mentioned previously as preferred sites for R. annulatus on the bodies of cattle (Walker et al. 2003). Previous literature indicated that the udders of cattle are classified as the most favorable site for infestation by this species (Gabaj et al. 1992). In this study, males were collected mostly from around the anus opening, and no studies discussed this observation previously. Our observations indicated that semiengorged females were collected more frequently than those that were fully engorged, which could be due to fully engorged R. annulatus female ticks usually laying eggs more quickly (Gindin et al. 2001) and thus dropping from their host for egg laying.
Ecological niche modeling is an important technique for identifying geographic and ecological areas suitable for any species (Soberon and Peterson 2005). Throughout the present work, MaxEnt was used to predict the potential global distribution of R. annulatus based on climatic and NDVI variables. As R. annulatus is known for its role in the transmission of babesiosis and bovine anaplasmosis to cattle (Walker et al. 2003), the potential distribution maps of this species will be beneficial to vector surveillance programs for monitoring areas deemed to be highly suitable habitats for this species and to vector control programs, especially in countries where surveillance is unavailable.
The MaxEnt model performed better than random for predicting the distribution of R. annulatus with a high AUC value, which was greater than 0.95; additionally, partial ROC analysis was used to test the statistical significance of the model predictions, and the results were greater than the null hypothesis. In addition, ExDet (extrapolation detection) was included to understand the extrapolation of the results to different areas in the region of interest. In fact, the novel climate estimation confirmed the importance of using MaxEnt in anticipating ENMs for species, where prediction maps of MaxEnt anticipated these values only under analogous environmental conditions.
The obtained results indicated that annual mean temperature (Bio1), annual precipitation (Bio12), and median NDVI were the most important predictors of R. annulatus habitat distribution. This species preferred habitats with high temperatures and annual precipitation amounts (Estrada-Peña et al. 2006; Estrada-Peña and Venzal 2007), and the same results were acquired from the response curves (Fig. 3). Additionally, the suitable habitats for R. annulatus decreased with increasing median NDVI values. This finding was consistent with that of Estrada-Peña et al. (2006), who indicated that the presence of this species in the Mediterranean region and the zone south of the Sahara Desert was associated with low NDVI values for much of the year.
The produced model estimated the suitable habitat for R. annulatus across the world. Our results predicted the presence of this vector in South Texas of the USA along the Texas–Mexico border, and this result overlapped in most cases with those of previously published studies (Estrada-Peña and Venzal 2006; Giles et al. 2014). Additionally, a previous study (Lohmeyer et al. 2011) indicated the presence of R. annulatus in Maverick, Kinney, and Webb Counties in southern Texas; this previous result concurred with our prediction in these regions. In California, this species is sometimes found (Spickler and Rovid 2007), which is similar to our result that predicted the potential distribution of R. annulatus in this region. No previous reports have indicated the presence of this species in New Mexico, Arizona, and Washington, although our model predicted its potential distribution in these states.
Our model predicted the presence of this vector in Brazil, Bolivia, Venezuela, and Argentina; however, previous studies interested in the surveillance of ticks in Brazil and Bolivia indicated that the presence of R. annulatus in these two countries was regarded as erroneous due to misidentification (Dantas-Torres et al. 2009; Mastropaolo et al. 2014). Hence, our study sheds light on performing de novo field surveillance for this vector in these regions.
In Africa, Estrada-Peña et al. (2006) predicted the distribution of R. annulatus. The results of our model overlap in most cases with the results of this study in areas with Mediterranean and savanna climates, especially in West and North Africa; however, our model showed an increase in suitable habitats in North Africa (Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco). Our map anticipated new suitable areas in Central Africa (Gabon, Central African Republic, and the Democratic Republic of Congo) and Eastern Africa (Tanzania), where the species was also identified (Kerario et al. 2017; Guglielmone and Robbins 2018). Our model was the first to focus on mapping the potential geographical distribution of this species in the Near East and Asia.
However, the present work predicts the potential current distribution of R. annulatus and has some limitations in anticipating the future distribution for species under climate change. We intentionally ignored predictions for future scenarios due to a lack of future data for NDVI variables, which made it difficult to project these models into the future. Finally, this study can guide control programs and surveillance priorities, which are primarily dependent on estimating suitable areas where a vector may occur. This study provided further details related to mapping the potential current distribution of R. annulatus worldwide, improved the information on the potential distribution of R. annulatus, and identified several other regions at risk of invasions by this vector.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Aboelhadid SM, Arafa WM, Wahba A, Mahrous LN, Ibrahium SM, Holman PJ (2018) Effect of high concentrations of lufenuron, pyriproxyfen and hydroprene on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus. Vet Parasitol 256:35–42
Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Modell 222:1810–1819
Bock R, Jackson L, De Vos A, Jorgensen W (2004) Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 129:S247–S269
Boorgula GD, Peterson AT, Foley DH, Ganta RR, Raghavan RK (2020) Assessing the current and future potential geographic distribution of the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae) in North America. PLoS ONE 15(8):e0237191
Dantas-Torres F, Onofrio VC, Barros-Battesti DM (2009) The ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Argasidae, ixodidae) of Brazil. Syst Appl Acarol 14:30–47
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1):27–46
El Kammah K, Oyoun L, El Kady G, Shafy S (2001) Investigation of blood parasites in livestock infested with argasid and ixodid ticks in Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31(2):365
Estrada-Peña A, Venzal J (2006) High-resolution predictive mapping for Boophilus annulatus and B. Microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Mexico and southern Texas. Vet Parasitol 142:350–358
Estrada-Peña A, Venzal JM (2007) Climate niches of tick species in the Mediterranean region: modeling of occurrence data, distributional constraints, and impact of climate change. J Med Entomol 44:1130–1138
Estrada-Peña A, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Guglielmone A, Horak I, Jongejan F, Latif A, Pegram R, Walker AR (2006) The known distribution and ecological preferences of the tick subgenus Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa and Latin America. Exp Appl Acarol 38:219–235
Gabaj M, Awan M, Beesley W (1992) A survey of ticks on farm animals in Libya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 86(5):543–548
Giles JR, Peterson AT, Busch JD, Olafson PU, Scoles GA, Davey RB, Pound JM, Kammlah DM, Lohmeyer KH, Wagner DM (2014) Invasive potential of cattle fever ticks in the southern United States. Parasit Vectors 7:189
Gindin G, Samish M, Alekseev E, Glazer I (2001) The susceptibility of Boophilus annulatus (Ixodidae) ticks to entomopathogenic fungi. Biocontrol Sci Technol 11(1):111–118
Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84(11):2809–2815
Graham OH, Price MA (1966) Some morphological variations in Boophilus annulatus microplus (Acarina: Ixodidae) from northern Mexico. Ann Entomol Soc 59:450–452
Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG (2018) Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodoidea) parasitizing humans. Springer, A global overview, 313 pp
Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG (2014) The hard ticks of the world: (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg, 738 pp
Hassan MI, Gabr HS, Abdel-Shafy S, Hammad KM, Mokhtar MM (2017) Molecular detection of Borrelia sp. in ornithodoros savignyi and rhipicephalus annulatus by FlaB gene and babesia bigemina in R. annulatus by 18S rRNA gene. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 47:403–414
Hoogstraal H, Kaiser MN (1960) Observations on ticks (Ixodoidea) of Libya. Ann Entomol Soc 53(4):445–457
Hoogstraal H (1956) African Ixodoidea. I. Ticks of the Sudan (with special reference to Equatoria Province and with preliminary reviews of the genera Boophilus, Margaropus, and Hyalomma). Department of the Navy, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, US Naval Medical Research Unit 3, Cairo, Egypt. 1100 pp.
Jongejan F, Uilenberg G (2004) The global importance of ticks. Parasitology 129:S3–S14
Kerario II, Muleya W, Chenyambuga S, Koski M, Hwang SG, Simuunza M (2017) Abundance and distribution of ixodid tick species infesting cattle reared under traditional farming systems in Tanzania. Afr J Agric Res 12:286–299
Kessler WH, Ganser C, Glass GE (2019) Modeling the distribution of medically important tick species in Florida. Insects 10(7):190
Khanum R, Mumtaz AS, Kumar S (2013) Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecol 49:23–31
Klafke GM, Moreno HC, Tidwell JP, Miller RJ, Thomas DB, Feria-Arroyo TP, de León AAP (2020) Partial characterization of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene and molecular detection of permethrin resistance in Rhipicephalus annulatus (Say, 1821). Ticks Tick Borne Dis 11(3):101368
Kriticos DJ, Jarošik V, Ota N (2014) Extending the suite of bioclim variables: a proposed registry system and case study using principal components analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 5:956–960
Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) Auc: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151
Loftis AD, Reeves WK, Szumlas DE, Abbassy MM, Helmy IM, Moriarity JR, Dasch GA (2006) Rickettsial agents in Egyptian ticks collected from domestic animals. Exp Appl Acarol 40:67–81
Lohmeyer KH, Pound JM, May MA, Kammlah DM, Davey RB (2011) Distribution of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Acari: Ixodidae) infestations detected in the United States along the Texas/Mexico border. J Med Entomol 48:770–774
Lorusso V, Picozzi K, de Bronsvoort BM, Majekodunmi A, Dongkum C, Balak G, Igweh A, Welburn SC (2013) Ixodid ticks of traditionally managed cattle in central Nigeria: where Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus does not dare (yet?). Parasit Vectors 6(1):171
Mastropaolo M, Beltrán-Saavedra LF, Guglielmone AA (2014) The ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Argasidae, Ixodidae) of Bolivia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 5:186–194
Mazyad S, Khalaf S (2002) Studies on theileria and babesia infecting live and slaughtered animals in Al Arish and El Hasanah, North Sinai Governorate. Egypt J Egypt Soc Parasitol 32(2):601–610
McCosker P (1981) The global importance of babesiosis. In: Ristic M, Kreier J (eds) Babesiosis. Academic Press Inc., 1–24 pp
Mesgaran MB, Cousens RD, Webber BL (2014) Here be dragons: a tool for quantifying novelty due to covariate range and correlation change when projecting species distribution models. Divers Distrib 20(10):1147–1159
Miller R, Estrada-Peña A, Almazán C, Allen A, Jory L, Yeater K, Messenger M, Ellis D, de León AAP (2012) Exploring the use of an anti-tick vaccine as a tool for the integrated eradication of the cattle fever tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus. Vaccine 30:5682–5687
Murrell A, Barker SC (2003) Synonymy of Boophilus Curtice, 1891 with Rhipicephalus Koch, 1844 (Acari: Ixodidae). Syst Parasitol 56(3):169–172
Nasser M, El-Hawagry M, Okely M (2019) Environmental niche modeling for some species of the genus Anthrax Scopoli (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in Egypt with special notes on St Catherine protected area as a suitable habitat. J. Insect Conserv. 23(5):831–841
Nasser M, Okely M, Nasif O, Alharbi S, GadAllah S, Al-Obaid S, Enan R, Bala M, Al-Ashaal S (2021) Spatio-temporal analysis of Egyptian flower mantis Blepharopsis mendica (order: Mantodea), with notes of its future status under climate change. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(4):2049–2055
Okely M, Anan R, Gad-Allah S, Samy AM (2020) Mapping the environmental suitability of etiological agent and tick vectors of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Acta Trop 203:105319
Okely M, Nasser M, Enan R, GadAllah S, AlAshaal S (2020b) Mantodea oasis of Palaearctic region: biogeographical analysis of Mantodea in Egypt. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30(1):1–10
Okely M, Anan R, Gad-Allah S, Samy AM (2021) Hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting domestic animals in Egypt: diagnostic characters and a taxonomic key to the collected species. Med Vet Entomol 35(3):333–351
Okely M, Chen Z, Anan R, Gad-Allah S (2022) Updated checklist of the hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Egypt, with notes of livestock host and tick-borne pathogens. Syst Appl Acarol 27(5):811–838
Pascoe EL, Marcantonio M, Caminade C, Foley JE (2019) Modeling potential habitat for Amblyomma tick species in California. Insects 10(7):201
Peterson AT, Pereira RS, Neves VFDC (2004) Using epidemiological survey data to infer geographic distributions of leishmaniasis vector species. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 37:10–14
Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Modell 213(1):63–72
Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo MB (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions (mpb-49), vol 56. Princeton University Press, NJ,USA, pp 97–137
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259
Popara M, Villar M, Mateos-Hernández L, de Mera IGF, Marina A, del Valle M, Almazán C, Domingos A, de la Fuente J (2013) Lesser protein degradation machinery correlates with higher BM86 tick vaccine efficacy in Rhipicephalus annulatus when compared to Rhipicephalus microplus. Vaccine 31(42):4728–4735
Raghavan RK, Goodin DG, Hanzlicek GA, Zolnerowich G, Dryden MW, Anderson GA, Ganta RR (2016) Maximum entropy-based ecological niche model and bio-climatic determinants of lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) niche. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 16(3):205–211
Samish M, Pipano E, Hadani A (1993) Intrastadial and interstadial transmission of Anaplasma marginale by Boophilus annulatus ticks in cattle. Am J Vet Res 54(3):411–414
Shoukry A, El-Kady G, Merdan A (1993) Distribution and host-relationship of ticks (Ixodoidea) infesting domestic animals and rodents in Sinai Peninsula. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 23(2):459–469
Soberon J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10
Spickler C, Rovid A (2007) Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus, 2007. At http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/factsheets.php. Accessed Feb 2007
Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857):1285–1293
Syfert MM, Smith MJ, Coomes DA (2013) The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS ONE 8(2):e55158
Torina A, Alongi A, Naranjo V, Estrada-Peña A, Vicente J, Scimeca S, Marino AM, Salina F, Caracappa S, de la Fuente J (2008) Prevalence and genotypes of anaplasma species and habitat suitability for ticks in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(24):7578–7584
Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG, Latif AA, Pegram RG, Preston PM (2003) Ticks of domestic animals in Africa: a guide to identification of species. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Bioscience Reports, 221 pp
Williams HW, Cross DE, Crump HL, Drost CJ, Thomas CJ (2015) Climate suitability for European ticks: assessing species distribution models against null models and projection under ar5 climate. Parasit Vectors 8:440
Zhao GP, Wang YX, Fan ZW, Ji Y, Liu MJ, Zhang WH, Li XL, Zhou SX, Li H, Liang S, Liu W, Yang Y, Fang LQ (2021) Mapping ticks and tick-borne pathogens in China. Nat Commun 12(1):1–13
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support from Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R37), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors also appreciate the effort of Ms. Marine Radwen, USAID, Egypt, for her help in language correction and style of writing revision.
Funding
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R37).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Mohammed Okely and Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Methodology: Mohammed Okely. Software: Mohammed Okely. Validation: Mohammed Okely. Formal analysis: Mohammed Okely and Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Investigation: Mohammed Okely and Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Resources: Mohammed Okely and Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Data curation: Mohammed Okely. Writing—original draft preparation: Mohammed Okely. Writing—review and editing: Mohammed Okely and Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Visualization: Mohammed Okely. Supervision: Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Project administration: Areej A. Al-Khalaf. Funding acquisition: Areej A. Al-Khalaf. All authors have reviewed and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Verbal informed consent was obtained from all animal owners following a detailed explanation on the study purpose. Only tick samples were collected from live animals and no other medical intervention was undertaken on these animals for this study.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Una Ryan
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Okely, M., Al-Khalaf, A.A. Predicting the potential distribution of the cattle fever tick Rhipicephalus annulatus (Acari: Ixodidae) using ecological niche modeling. Parasitol Res 121, 3467–3476 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07670-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07670-w