Abstract
Main conclusion
In response to low nitrogen stress, multiple hormones together with nitric oxide signaling pathways work synergistically and antagonistically in crop root elongation.
Abstract
Changing root morphology allows plants to adapt to soil nutrient availability. Nitrogen is the most important essential nutrient for plant growth. An important adaptive strategy for crops responding to nitrogen deficiency is root elongation, thereby accessing increased soil space and nitrogen resources. Multiple signaling pathways are involved in this regulatory network, working together to fine-tune root elongation in response to soil nitrogen availability. Based on existing research, we propose a model to explain how different signaling pathways interact to regulate root elongation in response to low nitrogen stress. In response to a low shoot nitrogen status signal, auxin transport from the shoot to the root increases. High auxin levels in the root tip stimulate the production of nitric oxide, which promotes the synthesis of strigolactones to accelerate cell division. In this process, cytokinin, ethylene, and abscisic acid play an antagonistic role, while brassinosteroids and auxin play a synergistic role in regulating root elongation. Further study is required to identify the QTLs, genes, and favorable alleles which control the root elongation response to low nitrogen stress in crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) is one of the main nutrients limiting crop production. Crop yields have increased dramatically over the past 50 years due to the use of N fertilizers (Jiao et al. 2016). However, the average N recovery rate of crops is only 30–40% in the growing season (Chen et al. 2014a). N not absorbed by the crop may be fixed by the soil, leached to deep soil layers, or volatilized to the atmosphere in the form of ammonia or nitrogen oxides (Ju et al. 2009). Loss of N increases the cost of agricultural production and accelerates environmental degradation (Chen et al. 2014b). Optimizing N fertilizer input technology can effectively improve N fertilizer utilization rates. In addition, breeding of new N-efficient crop cultivars may achieve higher yields with low N (van Bueren et al. 2017), which promotes sustainable agricultural development (Lynch 2019).
Lynch (2007) proposed that the improvement of root traits will be the second green revolution in agricultural production. The root is the primary organ for acquisition of nutrients and water from the soil, and thus root system architecture plays a central role in adaptation to various abiotic stresses including nutrient deficiency, drought, waterlogging, and salinity (Mi et al. 2010; Mickelbart et al. 2015; Koevoets et al. 2016; Mariani et al. 2017). Large genotypic variation exists in root characteristics not only among different species, but also within a certain crop (Laperche et al. 2006; Phung et al. 2016; Fan et al. 2018; Sanchez et al. 2018). To improve root breeding strategies, it is necessary to recognize the root response to different stress conditions, determine desirable root traits, and understand the physiological mechanism underlined.
Nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) are the major inorganic N forms required for plant growth. While NO3− is mobile in soils, NH4+ is strongly fixed by soil particles and later released. About 2/3 of fertilizer N is fixed into soil by various chemical and biological processes. As a result, organic N is the most abundant N form in soil (Havlin et al. 2016). With increasing N deficiency, crop plants utilize more organic N resources, which are mineralized slowly and controlled by soil microbes (Mengel et al. 1982). Even in fertilized arable soil, more than half of the N required by crops comes from soil mineralization (Mikkelsen and Hartz 2008; Kirkby et al. 2014). Therefore, of the N available for crop plant uptake, only a small fraction comes from the mass flow of water, while a large portion originates from the slow mineralization of organic N. A corresponding adaptive strategy for plants is changing root morphology to explore more soil spaces for N resources. This may explain why a large root system is positively correlated to high N use efficiency in crop plants (Yu et al. 2015).
The model plant Arabidopsis has been demonstrated to have a root response to changing N supplies (see reviews in Zhang and Forde 2000; Forde 2014; Kiba and Krapp 2016). However, the root system of a crop (such as maize, wheat, and rice) is much more complex than that of Arabidopsis (Gruber et al. 2013; Atkinson et al. 2014; Bellini et al. 2014). Arabidopsis has a taproot system with one primary root from which several orders of lateral roots emerge. Cereal crops have a fibrous root system, which consists of roots derived from the embryo (embryonic roots) and those formed after germination from existing roots or shoots (postembryonic roots). The embryonic roots include a primary root and a number of seminal roots. The postembryonic roots arising from tissues other than roots are termed adventitious roots (Steffens and Rasmussen 2016). Both embryonic and postembryonic shoot-borne roots have the capacity to form highly branched lateral roots (Yu et al. 2016; Hochholdinger et al. 2018). The primary, seminal, shoot-borne roots are also termed axial roots (Rich and Watt 2013). The response of crop root systems to N deficiency can thus be quite different from that of Arabidopsis.
In crop-soil systems, NO3− and NH4+ are the predominant inorganic N forms. The average concentrations of NO3− and NH4+ in the soil are 6.0 mmol dm−3 and 0.77 mmol dm−3, respectively (Wolt 1994). NH4+ content in the soil under aerobic conditions is very low, only 1/1000–1/10 of that of NO3− (Marschner 2012). Most applied NH4+ fertilizer is transformed into NO3− within several days (Stevenson 1982; Legg and Meisinder 1982). Therefore, NO3− is the main inorganic N form absorbed and utilized by most crop plants (Bloom 2015). In experimental conditions, a high supply of NH4+ inhibits root and shoot growth in most crops (maize, Cramer and Lewis 1993; rice, Hirano et al. 2008; wheat, Cox and Reisenauer 1973), and a mixed supply of NO3− and NH4+ can improve root and shoot growth (Guo et al. 2007; Li et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2018, 2019). In this review, we focus on root elongation in response to low NO3− supply. For the response of plant root elongation to NH4+-N supply, or the differential effect of NO3−-N and NH4+-N on root growth, readers may refer to recent reviews (Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Li et al. 2014; Liu and von Wirén 2017; Jia and von Wirén 2020).
Root growth response to N supply in crop plants
Root-to-shoot ratio
Plant roots sense external environmental signals and have plastic responses morphologically and physiologically. The root responses likely reflect different strategies to cope with N availability. Under mild N deficiency, Arabidopsis plants adopt a “systemic foraging strategy” with a characteristic increase in root size. In severe N-deficient environments, Arabidopsis plants adopt a “survival strategy” of inhibited root growth (Gruber et al. 2013; Giehl and von Wirén 2014). This similar strategy is shown in crop plants like rice (Shi et al. 2005) and maize (Fig. 1). In maize, shoot biomass increased with increasing NO3− supply, reached the maximum value at optimal N supply (about 10 mM in the specific experiment), and maintained this maximum for a range of N (about 10–20 mM), and then decreased when the N supply was further increased (Fig. 1). When N supply was reduced from the optimum (10 mM) to mild N deficiency (about 1 mM), shoot biomass decreased, but the root biomass increased. This root response can be considered as a “positive foraging strategy”. Root biomass was reduced when the N supply was further reduced. This root response can be considered a “negative survival strategy”. Decreasing N supply always resulted in an increase in the root-to-shoot ratio (Fig. 1). The increase in root growth seems to be controlled by the internal N status signal of plants. In Arabidopsis, Scheible et al. (1997) showed that the root-to-shoot ratio is controlled by shoot N status, indicated by NO3− concentration.
Under low N conditions, plants allocate a larger proportion of assimilated N and carbon (C) to the roots. Transport of C from shoot to the root via the phloem is enhanced (Gao et al. 2015; Wang and Ruan 2016). Rufty et al. (1988) showed that, in N-deficient leaves, 52% of the assimilates are used for root respiration, thereby promoting root growth and providing sufficient energy for the absorption and assimilation of N. Under high N conditions, 40% of photosynthetic products are transported to the roots, and 25% of the assimilates are used for respiratory consumption of C metabolism (Cai et al. 2012; Irving 2015). N supply changes carbohydrate metabolism. Under low N conditions, sucrose concentration in the root decreases, but hexose and starch concentrations increase (Aloni et al. 1991). Stitt and Feil (1999) show that the concentration of sugar in tobacco roots decreased with increasing supply of NO3− (0.2–10 mM).
Plant hormone cytokinin (CTK) plays a central role in the regulation of N on substance allocation between the shoot and the root. When the external NO3− level is 3–22 mM, increasing NO3− supply does not affect the biomass, but the root-to-shoot ratio is significantly decreased, and the trans-zeatin-type CTK and root-to-shoot ratio are significantly negatively correlated (Wagner and Beck 1993). When N supply is low, CTK concentration in the root is reduced, resulting in a decrease in CTK transport from root to leaf. The decrease of CTK in the leaves reduces leaf cell division and leads to the inhibition of sucrose loading from the phloem to the growing cells, resulting in a decrease in sucrose supply in the leaves, which in turn leads to an increase in phloem turgor, so that more carbohydrates are distributed to the roots (Van der Werf and Nagel 1996).
Axial root elongation
Primary root elongation in Arabidopsis responds to N supply (Zhang and Forde 2000; Tian et al. 2009). Recently, Jia et al. (2019) found that mild N deficiency can increase the primary root length of Arabidopsis by 16%. In maize, the typical response of root growth to mild low-N stress is to reduce crown root number, and to increase the elongation of the axial roots, including the primary, seminal, and crown roots (Tian et al. 2005, 2008; Wang et al. 2005; Gaudin et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2015; Li et al. 2015) (Fig. 2a). Elongation of the primary root is enhanced even at severe low-N stress (Fig. 2b). Compared to sufficient N supply conditions, low N supply can increase axial root length by about 40%. The elongation of axial roots begins to increase after low N treatment (Fig. 3a). Gao et al. (2015) found that axial root elongation is significantly promoted when shoot N concentration decreased by more than 30% or the C to N ratio increased by more than 40%. This indicates that the shoot N concentration and C to N ratio may reflect the N status in the plant and play a regulatory role in the change of root morphology.
The promotion effect of low-N stress on root elongation is also found in rice (Sun et al. 2014, 2016, 2018a, b) and wheat (Ren et al. 2017, 2018; Xu et al. 2019). In rice, Sun et al. (2014) showed that, compared to normal N supply, seminal root length increased by about 22% at N concentration of 0.1 mM, and increased by 33% when N supply was further decreased to 0.01 mM and 0.02 mM. In wheat, Xu et al. (2019) found that an NO3− supply at 0.2 mM N or lower concentration significantly promoted the primary root growth of XY54 by 44.1%.
Lateral root growth
In crop plants, N deficiency has been found to promote lateral root growth (Sun et al. 2014), or inhibit lateral root growth (Gao et al. 2015). This discrepancy may be related to the degree of N deficiency (Fig. 2). In one experiment with maize, N deficiency did not affect lateral root length during the first 3 days of treatment (Fig. 3b). After 4 days, lateral root length was promoted under the low N treatment. With lasting N deficiency, lateral root growth began to be inhibited 8 days after the low-N treatment. These data suggest that, upon sensing N deficiency, the first response of maize is to promote lateral root growth in an attempt to obtain more N from the soil. With lasting N deficiency, when the plants cannot obtain sufficient N to support shoot growth, they adjust by reducing lateral root growth to reduce C and N consumption, but maintain elongation of the axial root to explore larger soil spaces (Fig. 3a). Therefore, as found in Arabidopsis, crop plants promote lateral root growth under mild N deficiency, and inhibit lateral root growth under severe N deficiency.
Physiological mechanism underlying root elongation in response to low-N stress
Cell division and elongation in the root apex
The longitudinal structure of the root consists of the root cap, apical meristem zone, elongation zone, and root hair mature zone (Ishikawa and Evans 1995). Root growth rate is regulated by two coordinated processes: cell division and expansion (Baskin 2013). In wheat, the enhanced root elongation observed in low N conditions is related to increased cell length (Bosemark et al. 2006). This is also observed in maize (Tian et al. 2008). However, high N concentration can also inhibit cell division in maize (Greef and Geisler 1991). Gao et al. (2014) used kinetics to analyze the mechanism of low N promoting the elongation of maize roots, and found that cell division and elongation in the root tip are equally important for root elongation. Low N promotes cell production rate, accelerates maximum elongation rate, increases the length of the elongation zone, and increases mature cell length. The response of the primary root and crown roots to low N is similar. It is not yet clear by which mechanism N regulates cell division and/or elongation. However, there is evidence that plant hormones auxin, CTK, ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), brassinosteroids (BRs), strigolactones (SLs), as well as the nitric oxide (NO) signal pathway, are involved in the process (Takatsuka and Umeda 2014; Pacifici et al. 2015; Steffens and Rasmussen 2016).
Auxin
Auxin regulates cell expansion according to the acid growth hypothesis (Rayle et al. 1992). This suggests that auxin initiates an acidification mechanism, possibly a membrane-bound H+ pump, and the pH of the solution in the matrix of the cell wall decreases. Some yet-undescribed enzyme(s) related to wall loosening are activated by the lowered apoplast pH. The wall is loosened, and cell enlargement takes place under the direct force of the cell’s own turgor pressure. Ultimately, cell elongation is promoted. In maize, Tian et al. (2008) found that indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) level in the roots increased with decreasing N supply, and that exogenous application of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and IAA restored primary root elongation under high N conditions. They also found that shoot-to-root IAA transport by phloem is higher at low N supply conditions. This was confirmed in another study with labeled IAA (Liu et al. 2010). Similar results have been reported in soybean (Caba et al. 2000). IAA concentration in soybean roots grown in 8 mM KNO3 was about 4 times less than those grown in 1 mM KNO3. When shoot-to-root IAA transport is inhibited by applying N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) at the junction between the shoot and the root in maize, the promotion effect of low-N on root elongation is severely inhibited (Fig. 4). These results further confirm that low N induces shoot-to-root auxin transport and thereby enhances root elongation. Supporting this, Li et al. (2017) overexpressed the auxin efflux transporter ZmPIN1a in maize and found that the shoot-to-root transport of auxin was enhanced. As a result, carbohydrate level in the roots increased and root growth increased, with longer seminal roots and denser lateral roots. In rice, however, Sun et al. (2014) obtained an opposite result. They found that low NO3− supply reduced auxin concentration in the roots. Similarly, in N-starved maize plants, localized supply of NO3− to the transition zone in root can increase local auxin accumulation to increase root elongation (Manoli et al. 2016). These findings suggest the complexity of the regulatory network and imply that auxin may interact with other factors to regulate root elongation under low N conditions.
Cytokinin
Cytokinin (CTK) promotes cell division and differentiation (Schaller et al. 2014). CTK mediates the transduction of the N signal from root to shoot (Gu et al. 2018). N supply significantly affects CTK concentration in barley (Samuelson and Larsson 1993), tobacco (Singh et al. 1992), and Urtica dioica (Wagner and Beck 1993). Collier et al. (2003) found that NO3− increased phloem CTK levels. Recovery of the N supply led to increased CTK content in maize xylem sap (also in shoots and roots) (Takei et al. 2001). In P. chinensis, exogenous treatment with CTK can overcome the growth restriction effect caused by low N supply (Kuiper 1988). Compared to NH4+ supply, the stimulating effect of NO3− on shoot growth in tobacco was associated with increased levels of CTK in leaves and xylem (Walch-Liu et al. 2000).
However, high CTK level in the roots is not favorable for root elongation. In regulating root development, CTK negatively regulates the effect of auxin on cell division and cell differentiation, and ultimately affects the size of root meristem (Sozzani and Iyer-Pascuzzi 2014; Chandler and Werr 2015). Exogenous application of CTK or overexpression of the IPT gene (promoting CTK synthesis) significantly inhibited root elongation, while overexpression of the CKX gene (promoting CTK breakdown) promoted root growth (Kuderová et al. 2008; Werner et al. 2010; Köllmer et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2016; Ivanov and Filin 2018). Given that N levels are closely related to CTK levels in roots, CTK is likely to play a role in the root architecture in response to N availability (Kiba et al. 2011). By comparing two maize inbred lines with differential root elongation responses to low N stress, Tian et al. (2005) found that the change in CTK content in roots was negatively related to root elongation induced by low N. In genotype Ye478, in which root elongation is more sensitive to high N supply, root CTK level was strongly increased by high N application. High N supply reduced the distance from the root apex to the first visible lateral root, similar to the phenotype caused by the exogenous addition of CTK. Moreover, exogenous CTK 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) completely reversed the stimulation of root elongation by low NO3− supply. Considering the observed complementary effects of auxin and CTK (Schaller et al. 2015), regulation of root elongation by N supply may be accomplished through its effect on the balance between CTK and auxin levels (Mi et al. 2008). In Arabidopsis primary roots, the short hypocotyl 2 (SHY2) gene links the auxin and CTK signaling pathways and regulates the balance between cell division and differentiation (Ioio et al. 2008).
Ethylene
As an important gaseous phytohormone, ethylene is widely involved in regulating a variety of biological processes such as plant growth, development, and response to environmental stress (Dubois et al. 2018). Exogenously applied ethylene reduces root elongation in various cereals (Smith et al. 1971; Kim et al. 1997; Alarcón et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2014; García et al. 2015; Vandenbussche and Van Der Straeten 2018). In Arabidopsis, ethylene reduces proton efflux and controls cell elongation (Ruzicka et al. 2007; Hahn et al. 2008; Strader et al. 2009; Staal et al. 2011), and this regulation process is closely related to auxin levels (Ruzicka et al. 2007; Stepanova et al. 2007; Swarup et al. 2007; Hu et al. 2017). Ethylene plays an important regulatory role in plant response to N availability (Iqbal et al. 2015). In some species, high NO3− supply promotes ethylene production in the root (Ligero et al. 1986, 1987; Caba et al. 1998). In maize roots, N deficiency reduces ethylene production, but increases root sensitivity to ethylene and induces aerenchyma formation (Drew et al. 1989; He et al. 1992). Gao et al. (2017) found that NO3− increases ethylene production and cortical aerenchyma formation in rice roots under water stress.
Early studies showed that an exogenous supply of CTK increased the production of ethylene (Stenlid 1982; Bertell et al. 1990). Cytokinin induces ethylene synthesis by modulating the activity of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS), a key enzyme in ethylene synthesis (Lee and Yoon 2018). Therefore, under high NO3− conditions, CTK content in the root is increased, which can both antagonize the action of auxin and promote the production of ethylene, thereby inhibiting root elongation (Mi et al. 2008).
Abscisic acid
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a stress hormone essential for plant abiotic and biological stress responses (Verma et al. 2016; Zhu 2016). Under water stress, accumulation of ABA in maize promotes the synthesis of proline in the root tip, increasing the net accumulation of osmotic substances, and maintains the growth of the root (Sharp et al. 1990). ABA also helps to activate the root antioxidant system and keep reactive oxygen species in a suitable concentration range to promote root growth (Sharp et al. 2002). In Medicago truncatula, ABA plays a similar role (Zhang et al. 2014). NO3− supply has a role in regulating ABA synthesis and/or functions. In Arabidopsis, increasing NO3− supply increases ABA levels in the root tip. NO3− stimulates the release of ABA from the inactive ABA-GE pool in the root tip by β-glucosidase (BG1). ABA can regulate root growth interactions with the GRAS transcription factor SCARECROW (SCR), which is a central player controlling cell division in the root meristem. Exogenously applied ABA inhibits the expression of SCR in the root tip. Cui et al. (2012) demonstrated that SCR inhibits the expression of ABA-INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) and ABI5 in root tip meristems, controlling root elongation. NO3− supply can increase ABA level in the root tip and inhibit the expression of SCR, stimulate the expression of ABI4 and ABI5, and regulate root growth (Cui et al. 2012; Ondzighi-Assoume et al. 2016).
In Medicago truncatula, Morère-Le et al. (2012) show that the dual-affinity NO3− transporter MtNPF6.8 can also transport ABA. MtNPF6.8 is expressed in the root tip and expression is stimulated by ABA. Root elongation in the MtNPF6.8 mutant is insensitive to the inhibition of high NO3− supply. However, ABA treatment can inhibit root elongation of the mutant under high NO3−. This indicates that ABA acts downstream of the NO3− transporter MtNPF6.8 and regulates root growth in the NO3− signaling pathway (Pellizzaro et al. 2014). It was previously demonstrated that inhibition of root elongation by high NO3− is altered in another high-affinity NO3− transporter MtNPF1.7 mutant, which has different ABA sensitivity (Harris and Dickstein 2010; Yendrek et al. 2010; Bagchi et al. 2012). Exogenous application of ABA restored the root phenotype of the MtNPF1.7 mutant (Liang et al. 2007). Pellizzaro et al. (2014) suggest that, in Medicago truncatula, the NO3− signaling pathway regulating primary root growth is dependent on ABA involvement and involves two NO3− transporters. MtNPF6.8 acts upstream of ABA, and MtNPF1.7 acts downstream of ABA to regulate the organization and activity of the root meristem (Liang and Harris 2005; Liang et al. 2007; Yendrek et al. 2010).
Nitric oxide
NO is a small gaseous molecule that is soluble in both water and lipids. In plants, NO can be produced by four pathways: nitric oxide synthase (NOS), nitrate reductase (NR), xanthine oxidase (XOS), and non-enzymatic reactions (Astier et al. 2018). NO acts as a signaling molecule that plays a key regulatory role in adventitious root formation (Wen et al. 2016), lateral root development (Sun et al. 2015), root hair formation (Liu et al. 2017), and primary root elongation (Zhao et al. 2007; Fernández-Marcos et al. 2011; Bai et al. 2014; Manoli et al. 2014). High levels of NO reduced the activity of the root meristem zone (Fernández-Marcos et al. 2011). A decrease in NO level reduced the elongation of the primary root and size of the root meristem in the NO-deficient mutant (Sanz et al. 2014). NO inhibits root elongation by reducing auxin transport in Arabidopsis and rice, suggesting an interaction of auxin and NO in regulating root growth (Fernández-Marcos et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2018a). In maize, Zhao et al. (2007) found that high NO3− supply reduced root elongation by reducing the NO level in the root tip. Application of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and IAA weakened this inhibition. Low N increases IAA content, which in turn leads to an increase in NO content, and ultimately promotes elongation of the primary root. Similarly, the enhanced elongation of rice roots under N deficiency is also regulated by NO (Sun et al. 2016). NOS inhibitors reduce primary root elongation in maize grown under low NO3− conditions, suggesting that NOS activity may be inhibited in plants grown in high-NO3− solutions, resulting in reduced levels of endogenous NO (Zhao et al. 2007).
Under limited N supply, relatively more NO3− is reduced in the root (Marschner 2012), which can lead to more NR-dependent NO production and, therefore, contribute to the stimulation of root elongation. Sun et al. (2015) found that, in rice, NO produced by the NR pathway plays a key role in increasing N uptake capacity by regulating lateral root formation and inorganic N uptake. Subsequent studies indicated that, compared to the NH4+ supply, NO produced by the NR pathway under NO3− supply further induces seminal root elongation by regulating auxin transport (Sun et al. 2018a). In addition, when the N-starved maize plant is resupplied with NO3−, the promotion rate of root elongation is also dependent on NO function. When the NR inhibitor (tungstate) was added externally, no root elongation was observed in NO3−-fed plants. However, adding SNP to N-starved plants can increase root elongation rate (Manoli et al. 2014).
Strigolactones
Strigolactones (SLs) are a class of carotenoid-derived hormones which have multiple functions in plant growth and development (Waters et al. 2017). SLs were originally identified as highly active germination stimulants of parasitic plant seeds (Cook et al. 1966), and subsequent studies found that SLs are closely related to plant branching (Waldie et al. 2014; Conn et al. 2015). They can be synthesized in both roots and shoots (Kretzschmar et al. 2012; Hou et al. 2016). In Arabidopsis SL-deficient mutants (max1 and max4) or the SL-insensitive mutants (max2), the length of the primary root was significantly shorter, and the number of cells in the meristem zone was significantly reduced. Exogenous application of low concentrations of the SL analog GR24 increased the number of cells in the meristem zone and promoted the length of the primary root in the wild-type and SL-deficient mutants, but had no effect on the SL-insensitive mutants. High concentrations of GR24 inhibited the elongation of the primary root, reducing the intensity of PIN1, PIN3 and PIN7 green fluorescent protein in the root, indicating that SLs regulate the growth of the primary root by controlling the flux of auxin (Ruyter-Spira et al. 2011). Biosynthesis and exudation of SLs are increased under N deficiency (Marzec et al. 2013; Yoneyama et al. 2013). Yoneyama et al. (2015) found that shoot-derived signals other than auxin are involved in systemic regulation of SL production in roots, but the nature of the shoot-derived signals requires further study. In rice, N deficiency induction of root elongation is explained by the increased production of SLs, mediated by increasing expression of the SL biosynthesis genes D10, D17, and D27 (Sun et al. 2014). Exogenous application of GR24 restores the root phenotypes of SL-deficient mutants (d10 and d27), with no effect on the SL-insensitive mutants (d3). SLs can also act to inhibit the elongation of the primary root (Manoli et al. 2016). In maize, recovery of the NO3− supply after N deficiency results in elongation of the primary root within 2 h, concurrent with decreased expression of the genes involved in the biosynthesis and transport of SLs in the root transition zone (TZ). The application of a SL biosynthesis inhibitor (TIS108) promoted root elongation of N-deficient plants.
SLs and NO can synergistically regulate root elongation under N stress (Sanz et al. 2015). In SL mutants d3 and d10, increased NO levels in the apical meristem zone did not result in root elongation. Application of abamine (strigolactone inhibitor) reduced SNP-induced root elongation. NO induced degradation of D53, an inhibitor of the SL signaling pathway. This suggests that the elongation of rice seminal roots is induced by NO under N deficiency, and that NO is dependent on the participation of SLs (Sun et al. 2016).
Brassinosteroids
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are sterol growth-promoting hormones in plants, where effects include promoting cell elongation, affecting cell division and differentiation, promoting the development of reproductive organs, regulating morphogenesis, increasing resistance to stress, increasing biological yield, and interacting with other signals to regulate growth and development processes (Fariduddin et al. 2014). Low concentrations of BRs promote root growth, while high concentrations of BRs inhibit root growth (Roddick et al. 1993; Clouse et al. 1996; Müssig et al. 2003; Wei and Li 2016). In the Arabidopsis BR-insensitive mutant bri1-116 (Li and Chory 1997), the BR over-responsive mutant bes1-D (Yin et al. 2002), and transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing BRI1-GFP (Friedrichsen et al. 2000), the length of the primary root is shorter than that of the wild type. BRs affect the balance of division and differentiation of apical meristem cells, which in turn affects the size of the root meristem. BRs affect the size of the meristematic tissue area by affecting the cell cycle progression in the primary root meristem region, remodeling of quiescent central cells, and the differentiation of distal stem cells (González-García et al. 2011). BRs can alter the polar transport of auxin and its distribution in roots (Bao et al. 2004; Chaiwanon and Wang 2015). Auxin-induced genes are also induced by BRs (Goda et al. 2004; Nemhauser et al. 2004). BRs interact synergistically with auxin in controlling root elongation (Vragović et al. 2015). Recently, in Arabidopsis, Jia et al. (2019) found that low N specifically upregulates the transcriptional level of the BR co-receptor BAK1 to activate BR signaling and stimulate primary root elongation.
Conclusions and perspectives
Root elongation allows plants to build sound root system architecture and, therefore, is an important adaptive response to low-N environments. Given the complexity of the response, it is to be expected that multiple signaling pathways are involved in the regulatory network. These varied pathways fine-tune root elongation in response to soil N availability. Based on current knowledge, we propose a model to explain how different signaling pathways interact to regulate root elongation in response to low-N stress (Fig. 5). In an N-deficient plant, a low-N status signal in the shoot leads to increased transport of auxin from the shoot to the root (Mi et al. 2008; Tian et al. 2008). Increased auxin level in the root tip accelerates cell division by stimulating the production of NO (Zhao et al. 2007; Manoli et al. 2014), which in turn stimulates the synthesis of SLs (Sun et al. 2016). Root elongation can also be stimulated by NO derived from NO3− reduction. Auxin may also directly stimulate cell elongation by acidifying apoplast pH in the root elongation zone (Rayle et al. 1992). Both cell division and elongation contribute to the enhanced root elongation. The low-N status signal also upregulates the transcriptional level of the BR co-receptor BAK1 to activate BR signaling and stimulate primary root elongation, possibly via a synergistic interaction with auxin (Jia et al. 2019). Under high N availability conditions in the rhizosphere, a large amount of N is absorbed into the roots. High N levels in the root leads to high CTK synthesis, which antagonizes the auxin pathway and inhibits root elongation (Tian et al. 2005; Mi et al. 2008). CTK can also induce ethylene production, which inhibits root elongation by affecting the transport of auxin in the roots (Chae 2003; Stepanova et al. 2007). Excessive N can increase the level of free ABA, which in turn inhibits cell elongation, leading to short roots (Pellizzaro et al. 2014). Therefore, a plant can effectively coordinate internal N status and external N signals and balance the different signaling pathways, and fine-tune root elongation.
The above physiological regulatory network helps to understand how root elongation is enhanced under low-N stress. However, the underlying molecular and genetic mechanisms remain to be discovered. Future research will identify the key regulatory genes which will enable improvement of the root elongation response to low-N stress in crop plants. Genotypic differences predict differential root elongation responses to low-N stress in maize (Chun et al. 2005; Tian et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2005), suggesting this trait can be improved genetically. A related QTL is associated with the response of maize root elongation to low-N stress (Liu et al. 2008). More work is required to identify the key QTLs, genes, and favorable alleles related to this response. By utilizing new generation gene discovery tools such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genetic modification technologies (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9), new cultivars with greater root elongation ability will be developed to increase N use efficiency and achieve more sustainable development in agriculture (Hirel et al. 2011).
Materials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Seeds of the maize inbred line Ye478 were surface sterilized in 10% (v/v) H2O2 for 40 min, subsequently washed with deionized water three times and then soaked for 8 h in saturated CaSO4 solution. Seeds were then placed between sheets of filter paper soaked in deionized water and germinated in the dark at room temperature (20–22 °C). When the roots were approximately 2 cm long (about 1 day), uniform seedlings were placed approximately 2 cm below the top edge of the filter paper, covered with another piece of wet filter paper. The paper was rolled and placed into a plastic container filled with distilled water to allow the seeds to continue growing. When the seedlings had one expanded leaf, the endosperm was removed, then seedlings were transferred into porcelain pots (5 seedlings per pot) containing 2 L of nutrient solution. Hydroponic experiments were conducted in a growth chamber with the photosynthetic photon flux density of 300 μmol m−2 s−1 at canopy height, day/night temperature of 28/22 °C, and 60% relative humidity. The basic nutrient solution contained 0.75 mM K2SO4, 0.25 mM KH2PO4, 0.1 mM KCl, 0.65 mM MgSO4, 0.13 mM EDTA–Fe, 1.0 μM ZnSO4, 1.0 μM H3BO3, 1.0 μM MnSO4, 0.1 μM CuSO4, and 0.005 μM (NH4)6Mo7O24. Maize seedlings were supplied with NO3− concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mM provided as Ca(NO3)2, and the Ca2+ concentration in N treatments lower than 5 mM was adjusted to the same level as that of the 5 mM N treatment by the supply of CaCl2. The pH value of the solution was adjusted to 6.0 using KOH and HCl. The nutrient solution was renewed every 3 days and was aerated continuously by a pump. The pots were randomly placed and their positions were changed frequently.
Root phenotype
Six uniform seedlings from each treatment were sampled 1–9 days after low N (0.05 mM) and high N (5 mM) treatments. At each harvest, the primary axial root length was measured. The primary root samples were then floated in water in a transparent plastic tray and scanned with an Epson V700 scanner. Scanned root images were analyzed using the WinRHIZO software package (Pro 2014b, Canada). Total primary root length minus the primary axial root length was used to obtain the primary lateral root length.
Lanolin paste treatment of NPA
Each time the nutrient solution was changed, lanolin paste containing NPA was smeared uniformly around the junction between the shoot and the root. When preparing the lanolin paste blend, NPA was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to make a mother liquor, and the mother liquor was thoroughly mixed into heated lanolin paste. The final working concentrations of NPA were 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 μM. Control plants were treated with lanolin paste without NPA. Six uniform seedlings from each treatment were sampled 9 days after low N (0.05 mM), high N (5 mM), and NPA treatments. At each harvest, the primary axial root length was measured.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with ANOVA in SPSS Statistics 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were compared using the least significant difference test at the 0.05 level of probability. The data were then mapped with GraphPad Prism 7 software.
Author contribution statement
XS wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; FC and GM helped with the literature review; LY and GM oversaw the preparation of the manuscript; FC, LY, and GM contributed to the various revisions of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- N:
-
Nitrogen
- C:
-
Carbon
- NO3− :
-
Nitrate
- NH4+ :
-
Ammonium
- CTK:
-
Cytokinin
- NO:
-
Nitric oxide
- NR:
-
Nitrate reductase
- ABA:
-
Abscisic acid
- SLs:
-
Strigolactones
- BRs:
-
Brassinosteroids
- IAA:
-
Indole-3-acetic acid
- NAA:
-
1-Naphthaleneacetic acid
- NPA:
-
N-1-Naphthylphthalamic acid
- 6-BA:
-
6-Benzylaminopurine
- SHY2:
-
Short hypocotyl 2
- ACS:
-
1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase
- BG1:
-
β-Glucosidase
- SCR:
-
SCARECROW
- ABI4:
-
ABA INSENSITIVE 4
- ABI5:
-
ABA INSENSITIVE 5
- NOS:
-
Nitric oxide synthase
- XOS:
-
Xanthine oxidase
- SNP:
-
Sodium nitroprusside
- TZ:
-
Transition zone
- DMSO:
-
Dimethyl sulfoxide
- GWAS:
-
Genome-wide association study
References
Alarcón MV, Lloret-Salamanca A, Lloret PG et al (2009) Effects of antagonists and inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis on maize root elongation. Plant Signal Behav 4(12):1154–1156
Aloni B, Pashkar T, Karni L et al (1991) Nitrogen supply influences carbohydrate partitioning of pepper seedlings and transplant development. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116(6):995–999
Astier J, Gross I, Durner J (2018) Nitric oxide production in plants: an update. J Exp Bot 69(14):3401–3411
Atkinson JA, Rasmussen A, Traini R et al (2014) Branching out in roots: uncovering form, function, and regulation. Plant Physiol 166(2):538–550
Bagchi R, Salehin M, Adeyemo OS et al (2012) Functional assessment of the Medicago truncatula NIP/LATD protein demonstrates that it is a high-affinity nitrate transporter. Plant Physiol 160(2):906–916
Bai S, Yao T, Li M et al (2014) PIF3 is involved in the primary root growth inhibition of Arabidopsis induced by nitric oxide in the light. Mol Plant 7(4):616–625
Bao F, Shen J, Brady SR et al (2004) Brassinosteroids interact with auxin to promote lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(4):1624–1631
Baskin TI (2013) Patterns of root growth acclimation: constant processes, changing boundaries. Wires Dev Biol 2(1):65–73
Bellini C, Pacurar DI, Perrone I (2014) Adventitious roots and lateral roots: similarities and differences. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:639–666
Bertell G, Bolander E, Eliasson L (1990) Factors increasing ethylene production enhance the sensitivity of root growth to auxins. Physiol Plantarum 79(2):255–258
Bloom AJ (2015) The increasing importance of distinguishing among plant nitrogen sources. Curr Opin Plant Biol 25:10–16
Bosemark NO (2006) The influence of nitrogen on root development. Physiol Plant 7(3):497–502
Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ (2002) NH4+ toxicity in higher plants: a critical review. J Plant Physiol 159(6):567–584
Caba JM, Centeno ML, Fernández B et al (2000) Inoculation and nitrate alter phytohormone levels in soybean roots: differences between a supernodulating mutant and the wild type. Planta 211(1):98–104
Caba JM, Recalde L, Ligero F (1998) Nitrate-induced ethylene biosynthesis and the control of nodulation in alfalfa. Plant Cell Environ 21(1):87–93
Cai J, Chen L, Qu H et al (2012) Alteration of nutrient allocation and transporter genes expression in rice under N, P, K, and Mg deficiencies. Acta Physiol Plant 34(3):939–946
Chae HS (2003) The eto1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokinin treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by increasing the stability of ACS protein. Plant Cell 15(2):545–559
Chaiwanon J, Wang ZY (2015) Spatiotemporal brassinosteroid signaling and antagonism with auxin pattern stem cell dynamics in Arabidopsis roots. Curr Biol 25(8):1031–1042
Chandler JW, Werr W (2015) Cytokinin–auxin crosstalk in cell type specification. Trends Plant Sci 20(5):291–300
Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M et al (2014a) Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514(7523):486–489
Chen Y, Xiao C, Chen X et al (2014b) Characterization of the plant traits contributed to high grain yield and high grain nitrogen concentration in maize. Field Crop Res 159:1–9
Chun L, Mi G, Li J et al (2005) Genetic analysis of maize root characteristics in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant Soil 276(1–2):369–382
Clouse SD, Langford M, McMorris TC (1996) A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibits multiple defects in growth and development. Plant Physiol 111(3):671–678
Collier MD, Fotelli MN, Nahm M et al (2003) Regulation of nitrogen uptake by Fagus sylvatica on a whole plant level: interactions between cytokinins and soluble N compounds. Plant Cell Environ 26(9):1549–1560
Conn CE, Bythell-Douglas R, Neumann D et al (2015) Convergent evolution of strigolactone perception enabled host detection in parasitic plants. Science 349(6247):540–543
Cook CE, Whichard LP, Turner B et al (1966) Germination of witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.): isolation and properties of a potent stimulant. Science 154(3753):1189–1190
Cox WJ, Reisenauer HM (1973) Growth and ion uptake by wheat supplied nitrogen as nitrate, or ammonium, or both. Plant Soil 38(2):363–380
Cramer MD, Lewis OAM (1993) The influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) plants. Ann Bot-Lond 72(4):359–365
Cui H, Hao Y, Kong D (2012) Scarecrow has a short-root-independent role in modulating the sugar response1. Plant Physiol 158(4):1769–1778
Drew MC, He CJ, Morgan PW (1989) Decreased ethylene biosynthesis, and induction of aerenchyma, by nitrogen- or phosphate-starvation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 91(1):266–271
Dubois M, Van den Broeck L, Inzé D (2018) The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends Plant Sci 23(4):311–323
Fan X, Zhang W, Zhang N et al (2018) Identification of QTL regions for seedling root traits and their effect on nitrogen use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 131(12):2677–2698
Fariduddin Q, Yusuf M, Ahmad I et al (2014) Brassinosteroids and their role in response of plants to abiotic stresses. Biol Plant 58(1):9–17
Fernández-Marcos M, Sanz L, Lewis DR et al (2011) Nitric oxide causes root apical meristem defects and growth inhibition while reducing PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1)-dependent acropetal auxin transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(45):18506–18511
Forde BG (2014) Nitrogen signalling pathways shaping root system architecture: an update. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:30–36
Friedrichsen DM, Joazeiro CA, Li J et al (2000) Brassinosteroid-insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol 123(4):1247–1256
Gao C, Lei D, Li Y et al (2017) Nitrate increases ethylene production and aerenchyma formation in roots of lowland rice plants under water stress. Funct Plant Biol 44(4):430–442
Gao K, Chen F, Yuan L et al (2015) A comprehensive analysis of root morphological changes and nitrogen allocation in maize in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant Cell Environ 38(4):740–750
Gao K, Chen FJ, Yuan LX et al (2014) Cell production and expansion in the primary root of maize in response to low-nitrogen stress. J Integr Agr 13(11):2508–2517
García MJ, Romera FJ, Lucena C et al (2015) Ethylene and the regulation of physiological and morphological responses to nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol 169(1):51–60
Gaudin AC, McClymont SA, Holmes BM et al (2011) Novel temporal, fine-scale and growth variation phenotypes in roots of adult-stage maize (Zea mays L.) in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant Cell Environ 34(12):2122–2137
Giehl RF, von Wirén N (2014) Root nutrient foraging. Plant Physiol 166(2):509–517
Goda H, Sawa S, Asami T et al (2004) Comprehensive comparison of auxin-regulated and brassinosteroid-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(4):1555–1573
González-García MP, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Zhiponova M et al (2011) Brassinosteroids control meristem size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development 138(5):849–859
Greef JM, Geisler G (1991) Growth of excised maize roots (Zea mays L.) at increasing N-levels//Developments in Agricultural and Managed Forest Ecology. Elsevier 24:66–72
Gruber BD, Giehl RF, Friedel S et al (2013) Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol 163(1):161–179
Gu J, Li Z, Mao Y et al (2018) Roles of nitrogen and cytokinin signals in root and shoot communications in maximizing of plant productivity and their agronomic applications. Plant Sci 274:320–331
Guo S, Zhou Y, Shen Q et al (2007) Effect of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on some physiological processes in higher plants-growth, photosynthesis, photorespiration, and water relations. Plant Biol 9(01):21–29
Guo YF (2004) Genotypic difference in maize roots in response to localized nitrate supply and the possible physiological mechanisms. PhD thesis, China Agricultural University
Hahn A, Zimmermann R, Wanke D et al (2008) The root cap determines ethylene-dependent growth and development in maize roots. Mol Plant 1(2):359–367
Harris JM, Dickstein R (2010) Control of root architecture and nodulation by the LATD/NIP transporter. Plant Signal Behav 5(11):1365–1369
Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL et al (2016) Soil fertility and fertilizers. Pearson Education, India
He CJ, Morgan PW, Drew MC (1992) Enhanced sensitivity to ethylene in nitrogen- or phosphate-starved roots of Zea mays L. during Aerenchyma Formation. Plant Physiol 98(1):137–142
Hirano T, Satoh Y, Ohki A et al (2008) Inhibition of ammonium assimilation restores elongation of seminal rice roots repressed by high levels of exogenous ammonium. Physiol Plantarum 134(1):183–190
Hirel B, Tétu T, Lea PJ et al (2011) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in crops for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 3(9):1452–1485
Hochholdinger F, Yu P, Marcon C (2018) Genetic control of root system development in maize. Trends Plant Sci 23(1):79–88
Hou X, Rivers J, León P et al (2016) Synthesis and function of apocarotenoid signals in plants. Trends Plant Sci 21(9):792–803
Hu Y, Vandenbussche F, Van Der Straeten D (2017) Regulation of seedling growth by ethylene and the ethylene–auxin crosstalk. Planta 245(3):467–489
Ioio RD, Linhares FS, Sabatini S (2008) Emerging role of cytokinin as a regulator of cellular differentiation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11(1):23–27
Iqbal N, Umar S, Khan NA (2015) Nitrogen availability regulates proline and ethylene production and alleviates salinity stress in mustard (Brassica juncea). J Plant Physiol 178:84–91
Irving LJ (2015) Carbon assimilation, biomass partitioning and productivity in grasses. Agriculture 5(4):1116–1134
Ishikawa H, Evans ML (1995) Specialized zones of development in roots. Plant Physiol 109(3):725–727
Ivanov VB, Filin AN (2018) Cytokinins regulate root growth through its action on meristematic cell proliferation but not on the transition to differentiation. Funct Plant Biol 45(2):215–221
Jia Z, Giehl RF, Meyer RC et al (2019) Natural variation of BSK3 tunes brassinosteroid signaling to regulate root foraging under low nitrogen. Nat Commun 10(1):2378
Jia Z, von Wirén N (2020) Signaling pathways underlying nitrogen-dependent changes in root system architecture: from model to crop species. J Exp Bot eraa033
Jiao X, Lyu Y, Wu X et al (2016) Grain production versus resource and environmental costs: towards increasing sustainability of nutrient use in China. J Exp Bot 67(17):4935–4949
Ju XT, Xing GX, Chen XP et al (2009) Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(9):3041–3046
Kiba T, Krapp A (2016) Plant nitrogen acquisition under low availability: regulation of uptake and root architecture. Plant Cell Physiol 57(4):707–714
Kiba T, Kudo T, Kojima M et al (2011) Hormonal control of nitrogen acquisition: roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinin. J Exp Bot 62(4):1399–1409
Kim SY, Mulkey TJ (1997) Effect of ethylene antagonists on auxin-induced inhibition of intact primary root elongation in maize (Zea mays L.). J Plant Biol 40(4):256–260
Kirkby CA, Richardson AE, Wade LJ et al (2014) Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 68:402–409
Koevoets IT, Venema JH, Elzenga JT et al (2016) Roots withstanding their environment: exploiting root system architecture responses to abiotic stress to improve crop tolerance. Front Plant Sci 7:1335
Köllmer I, Novák O, Strnad M et al (2014) Overexpression of the cytosolic cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase (CKX 7) from Arabidopsis causes specific changes in root growth and xylem differentiation. Plant J 78(3):359–371
Kretzschmar T, Kohlen W, Sasse J et al (2012) A petunia ABC protein controls strigolactone-dependent symbiotic signalling and branching. Nature 483(7389):341–344
Kuderová A, Urbánková I, Válková M et al (2008) Effects of conditional IPT-dependent cytokinin overproduction on root architecture of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 49(4):570–582
Kuiper D (1988) Growth responses of Plantago major L. ssp. pleiosperma (Pilger) to changes in mineral supply: evidence for regulation by cytokinins. Plant Physiol 87(3):555–557
Laperche A, Devienne-Barret F, Maury O et al (2006) A simplified conceptual model of carbon/nitrogen functioning for QTL analysis of winter wheat adaptation to nitrogen deficiency. Theor Appl Genet 113(6):1131–1146
Lee HY, Yoon GM (2018) Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis by phytohormones in etiolated rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Mol Cells 41(4):311
Legg JO, Meisinder J (1982) Soil nitrogen budgets. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. American Society of Agronomy Inc, Madison, pp 503–507
Li B, Li G, Kronzucker HJ et al (2014) Ammonium stress in Arabidopsis: signaling, genetic loci, and physiological targets. Trends Plant Sci 19(2):107–114
Li J, Chory J (1997) A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell 90(5):929–938
Li P, Chen F, Cai H et al (2015) A genetic relationship between nitrogen use efficiency and seedling root traits in maize as revealed by QTL analysis. J Exp Bot 66(11):3175–3188
Li SX, Wang ZH, Stewart BA (2013) Responses of crop plants to ammonium and nitrate N//Advances in agronomy. Academic Press 118:205–397
Li Z, Zhang X, Zhao Y et al (2017) Enhancing auxin accumulation in maize root tips improves root growth and dwarfs plant height. Plant Biotechnol J 16(1):86–99
Liang Y, Harris JM (2005) Response of root branching to abscisic acid is correlated with nodule formation both in legumes and nonlegumes. Am J Bot 92(10):1675–1683
Liang Y, Mitchell D, Harris J (2007) Abscisic acid rescues the root meristem defects of the Medicago truncatula latd mutant. Dev Biol 304(1):297–307
Ligero F, Lluch C, Olivares J (1986) Evolution of ethylene from roots of Medicago sativa plants inoculated with Rhizobium meliloti. J Plant Physiol 125(3):361–365
Ligero F, Lluch C, Olivares J (1987) Evolution of ethylene from roots and nodulation rate of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants inoculated with Rhizobium meliloti as affected by the presence of nitrate. J Plant Physiol 129(5):461–467
Liu J, An X, Cheng L et al (2010) Auxin transport in maize roots in response to localized nitrate supply. Ann Bot-London 106(6):1019–1026
Liu J, Li J, Chen F et al (2008) Mapping QTLs for root traits under different nitrate levels at the seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 305(1–2):253–265
Liu M, Liu XX, He XL et al (2017) Ethylene and nitric oxide interact to regulate the magnesium deficiency-induced root hair development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 213(3):1242–1256
Liu Y, von Wirén N (2017) Ammonium as a signal for physiological and morphological responses in plants. J Exp Bot 68(10):2581–2592
Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the second green revolution. Aust J Bot 55(5):493–512
Lynch JP (2019) Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. New Phytol 223(2):548–564
Ma B, Yin CC, He SJ et al (2014) Ethylene-induced inhibition of root growth requires abscisic acid function in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. PLoS Genet 10(10):1
Manoli A, Begheldo M, Genre A et al (2014) NO homeostasis is a key regulator of early nitrate perception and root elongation in maize. J Exp Bot 65(1):185–200
Manoli A, Trevisan S, Voigt B et al (2016) Nitric oxide-mediated maize root apex responses to nitrate are regulated by auxin and strigolactones. Front Plant Sci 6:1269
Mariani L, Ferrante A (2017) Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses—drought, salinity, hypoxia, and lodging. Horticulturae 3(4):52
Marschner P (2012) Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic press, London
Marzec M, Muszynska A, Gruszka D (2013) The role of strigolactones in nutrient-stress responses in plants. Int J Mol Sci 14(5):9286–9304
Mengel K, Kirkby EA, Kosegarten H et al (1982) Nitrogen//Principles of plant nutrition. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 397–434
Mi GH, Chen FJ, Wu QP et al (2010) Ideotype root architecture for efficient nitrogen acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems. Sci China Life Sci 53(12):1369–1373
Mi GH, Chen FJ, Zhang FS (2008) Multiple signaling pathways controls nitrogen-mediated root elongation in maize. Plant Signal Behav 3(11):1030–1032
Mickelbart MV, Hasegawa PM, Bailey-Serres J (2015) Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nat Rev Genet 16(4):237–251
Mikkelsen R, Hartz TK (2008) Nitrogen sources for organic crop production. Better Crops 92(4):16–19
Morère-Le Paven MC, Viau L, Hamon A et al (2012) Characterization of a dual-affinity nitrate transporter MtNRT1.3 in the model legume Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot 62(15):5595–5605
Müssig C, Shin GH, Altmann T (2003) Brassinosteroids promote root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133(3):1261–1271
Nemhauser JL, Mockler TC, Chory J (2004) Interdependency of brassinosteroid and auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plos Biol 2(9):e258
Ondzighi-Assoume CA, Chakraborty S, Harris JM (2016) Environmental nitrate stimulates abscisic acid accumulation in Arabidopsis root tips by releasing it from inactive stores. Plant Cell 28(3):729–745
Pacifici E, Polverari L, Sabatini S (2015) Plant hormone cross-talk: the pivot of root growth. J Exp Bot 66(4):1113–1121
Pellizzaro A, Clochard T, Cukier C et al (2014) The nitrate transporter MtNPF6.8 (MtNRT1.3) transports abscisic acid and mediates nitrate regulation of primary root growth in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 166(4):2152–2165
Phung NT, Mai CD, Hoang GT et al (2016) Genome-wide association mapping for root traits in a panel of rice accessions from Vietnam. BMC Plant Biol 16(1):64
Rayle DL, Cleland RE (1992) The acid growth theory of auxin-induced cell elongation is alive and well. Plant Physiol 99(4):1271–1274
Ren Y, Qian Y, Xu Y et al (2017) Characterization of QTLs for root traits of wheat grown under different nitrogen and phosphorus supply levels. Front Plant Sci 8:2096
Ren Y, Yue H, Li L et al (2018) Identification and characterization of circRNAs involved in the regulation of low nitrogen-promoted root growth in hexaploid wheat. Biol Res 51(1):43
Rich SM, Watt M (2013) Soil conditions and cereal root system architecture: review and considerations for linking Darwin and Weaver. J Exp Bot 64(5):1193–1208
Roddick JG, Rijnenberg AL, Ikekawa N (1993) Developmental effects of 24-epibrassinolide in excised roots of tomato grown in vitro. Physiol Plantarum 87(4):453–458
Rufty TW, Huber SC, Volk RJ (1988) Alterations in leaf carbohydrate metabolism in response to nitrogen stress. Plant Physiol 88(3):725–730
Ruyter-Spira C, Kohlen W, Charnikhova T et al (2011) Physiological effects of the synthetic strigolactone analog GR24 on root system architecture in Arabidopsis: another belowground role for strigolactones? Plant Physiol 155(2):721–734
Ruzicka K, Ljung K, Vanneste S et al (2007) Ethylene regulates root growth through effects on auxin biosynthesis and transport-dependent auxin distribution. Plant Cell 19(7):2197–2212
Samuelson ME, Larsson CM (1993) Nitrate regulation of zeation riboside levels in barley roots: effects of inhibitors of N assimilation and comparison with ammonium. Plant Sci 93(1–2):77–84
Sanchez DL, Liu S, Ibrahim R et al (2018) Genome-wide association studies of doubled haploid exotic introgression lines for root system architecture traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Sci 268:30–38
Sanz L, Albertos P, Mateos I et al (2015) Nitric oxide (NO) and phytohormones crosstalk during early plant development. J Exp Bot 66(10):2857–2868
Sanz L, Fernándezmarcos M, Modrego A et al (2014) Nitric oxide plays a role in stem cell niche homeostasis through its interaction with Auxin. Plant Physiol 166(4):1972–1984
Schaller GE, Bishopp A, Kieber JJ (2015) The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. Plant Cell 27(1):44–63
Schaller GE, Street IH, Kieber JJ (2014) Cytokinin and the cell cycle. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:7–15
Scheible WR, Lauerer M, Schulze ED et al (1997) Accumulation of nitrate in the shoot acts as a signal to regulate shoot-root allocation in tobacco. Plant J 11(4):671–691
Sharp RE (2002) Interaction with ethylene: Changing views on the role of abscisic acid in root and shoot growth responses to water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25(2):211–222
Sharp RE, Hsiao TC, Silk WK (1990) Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials: II. role of growth and deposition of hexose and potassium in osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiol 93(4):1337–1346
Shi Z, Fan X, Klaus D et al (2005) Effect of localized nitrogen supply on root morphology in rice and its mechanism. Chin J Rice Sci 19(2):147–152
Singh S, Letham DS, Zhang X et al (1992) Cytokinin biochemistry in relation to leaf senescence. VI. Effect of nitrogenous nutrients on cytokinin levels and senescence of tobacco leaves. Phys Plant 84(2):262–268
Smith KA, Robertson PD (1971) Effect of ethylene on root extension of cereals. Nature 234(5325):148–149
Sozzani R, Iyer-Pascuzzi A (2014) Postembryonic control of root meristem growth and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 17:7–12
Staal M, De CT, Simon D et al (2011) Apoplastic alkalinization is instrumental for the inhibition of cell elongation in the Arabidopsis root by the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Plant Physiol 155(4):2049–2055
Steffens B, Rasmussen A (2016) The physiology of adventitious roots. Plant Physiol 170(2):603–617
Stenlid G (1982) Cytokinins as inhibitors of root growth [ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, antiauxin, auxin, auxin antagonist, ethylene, root elongation, Triticum aestivum, Linum usitatissimum, Cucumis sativus]. Physiol Plantarum 56(4):500–506
Stepanova AN, Yun J, Likhacheva AV et al (2007) Multilevel Interactions between ethylene and auxin in arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 19(7):2169–2185
Stevenson FJ (1982) Organic forms of soil nitrogen. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. American Society of Agronomy Inc, Madison, pp 67–122
Stitt M (1999) Feil R (1999) Lateral root frequency decreases when nitrate accumulates in tobacco transformants with low nitrate reductase activity: consequences for the regulation of biomass partitioning between shoots and root1. Plant Soil 215(2):143–153
Strader LC, Beisner ER, Bartel B (2009) Silver ions increase auxin efflux independently of effects on ethylene response. Plant Cell 21(11):3585–3590
Sun H, Bi Y, Tao J et al (2016) Strigolactones are required for nitric oxide to induce root elongation in response to nitrogen and phosphate deficiencies in rice. Plant Cell Environ 39(7):1473–1484
Sun H, Feng F, Liu J et al (2018a) Nitric oxide affects rice root growth by regulating auxin transport under nitrate supply. Front Plant Sci 9:659
Sun H, Jiao L, Song W et al (2015) Nitric oxide generated by nitrate reductase increases nitrogen uptake capacity by inducing lateral root formation and inorganic nitrogen uptake under partial nitrate nutrition in rice. J Exp Bot 66(9):2449–2459
Sun H, Tao J, Bi Y et al (2018b) OsPIN1b is involved in rice seminal root elongation by regulating root apical meristem activity in response to low nitrogen and phosphate. Sci Rep 8(1):13014
Sun H, Tao J, Liu S et al (2014) Strigolactones are involved in phosphate- and nitrate-deficiency-induced root development and auxin transport in rice. J Exp Bot 65(22):6735–6746
Swarup R, Perry P, Hagenbeek D et al (2007) Ethylene upregulates auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seedlings to enhance inhibition of root cell elongation. Plant Cell 19(7):2186–2196
Takatsuka H, Umeda M (2014) Hormonal control of cell division and elongation along differentiation trajectories in roots. J Exp Bot 65(10):2633–2643
Takei K, Sakakibara H, Taniguchi M et al (2001) Nitrogen-dependent accumulation of cytokinins in root and the translocation to leaf: implication of cytokinin species that induces gene expression of maize response regulator. Plant Cell Physiol 42(1):85–93
Tian Q, Chen F, Liu J et al (2008) Inhibition of maize root growth by high nitrate supply is correlated with reduced IAA levels in roots. J Plant Physiol 165(9):942–951
Tian Q, Chen F, Zhang F et al (2005) Possible involvement of cytokinin in nitrate-mediated root growth in maize. Plant Soil 277(1–2):185–196
Tian QY, Sun P, Zhang WH (2009) Ethylene is involved in nitrate-dependent root growth and branching in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 184(4):918–931
van Bueren ETL, Struik PC (2017) Diverse concepts of breeding for nitrogen use efficiency: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 37(5):50
Van der Werf A, Nagel OW (1996) Carbon allocation to shoots and roots in relation to nitrogen supply is mediated by cytokinins and sucrose: opinion. Plant Soil 185(1):21–32
Vandenbussche F, Van Der Straeten D (2018) The role of ethylene in plant growth and development. Annu Plant Rev online 219–241
Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP (2016) Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol 16(1):86
Vragović K, Sela A, Friedlander-Shani L et al (2015) Translatome analyses capture of opposing tissue-specific brassinosteroid signals orchestrating root meristem differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3):923–928
Wagner BM, Beck E (1993) Cytokinins in the perennial herb Urtica dioica L. as influenced by its nitrogen status. Planta 190(4):511–518
Walch-Liu P, Neumann G, Bangerth F et al (2000) Rapid effects of nitrogen form on leaf morphogenesis in tobacco. J Exp Bot 51(343):227–237
Waldie T, McCulloch H, Leyser O (2014) Strigolactones and the control of plant development: lessons from shoot branching. Plant J 79(4):607–622
Wang L, Ruan YL (2016) Shoot–root carbon allocation, sugar signalling and their coupling with nitrogen uptake and assimilation. Funct Plant Biol 43(2):105–113
Wang P, Wang Z, Pan Q et al (2019) Increased biomass accumulation in maize grown in mixed nitrogen supply is mediated by auxin synthesis. J Exp Bot 70(6):1859–1873
Wang P, Wang Z, Sun X et al (2018) Interaction effect of nitrogen form and planting density on plant growth and nutrient uptake in maize seedlings. J Integr Agr 17:60345–60347
Wang Y, Mi G, Chen F et al (2005) Response of root morphology to nitrate supply and its contribution to nitrogen accumulation in maize. J Plant Nutr 27(12):2189–2202
Waters MT, Gutjahr C, Bennett T et al (2017) Strigolactone signaling and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68(1):291–322
Wei Z, Li J (2016) Brassinosteroids regulate root growth, development, and symbiosis. Mol Plant 9(1):86–100
Wen D, Gong B, Sun S et al (2016) Promoting roles of melatonin in adventitious root development of Solanum lycopersicum L. by regulating auxin and nitric oxide signaling. Front Plant Sci 7:718
Werner T, Nehnevajova E, Köllmer I et al (2010) Root-specific reduction of cytokinin causes enhanced root growth, drought tolerance, and leaf mineral enrichment in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 22(12):3905–3920
Wolt JD (1994) Soil solution chemistry: applications to environmental science and agriculture. Wiley, Hoboken
Xu Y, Burgess P, Zhang X et al (2016) Enhancing cytokinin synthesis by overexpressing ipt alleviated drought inhibition of root growth through activating ROS-scavenging systems in Agrostis stolonifera. J Exp Bot 67(6):1979–1992
Xu Y, Ren Y, Li J et al (2019) Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into low nitrogen-promoted primary root growth in hexaploid wheat. Front Plant Sci 10:151
Yendrek CR, Lee YC, Morris V et al (2010) A putative transporter is essential for integrating nutrient and hormone signaling with lateral root growth and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Plant J 62(1):100–112
Yin Y, Wang ZY, Mora-Garcia S et al (2002) BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote stem elongation. Cell 109(2):181–191
Yoneyama K, Kisugi T, Xie X et al (2015) Shoot-derived signals other than auxin are involved in systemic regulation of strigolactone production in roots. Planta 241(3):687–698
Yoneyama K, Xie X, Kisugi T et al (2013) Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization negatively affects strigolactone production and exudation in sorghum. Planta 238(5):885–894
Yu P, Gutjahr C, Li C et al (2016) Genetic control of lateral root formation in cereals. Trends Plant Sci 21(11):951–961
Yu P, Li X, White PJ et al (2015) A large and deep root system underlies high nitrogen-use efficiency in maize production. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126293
Zhang C, Bousquet A, Harris JM (2014) Abscisic acid and lateral root organ defective/numerous infections and polyphenolics modulate root elongation via reactive oxygen species in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 166(2):644–658
Zhang H, Forde BG (2000) Regulation of Arabidopsis root development by nitrate availability. J Exp Bot 51(34):51–59
Zhao DY, Tian QY, Li LH et al (2007) Nitric oxide is involved in nitrate-induced inhibition of root elongation in Zea mays. Ann Bot Lond 100(3):497–503
Zhu JK (2016) Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167(2):313–324
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31672221).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Chen, F., Yuan, L. et al. The physiological mechanism underlying root elongation in response to nitrogen deficiency in crop plants. Planta 251, 84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03376-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03376-4