Abstract
Purpose
Xenobiotic metabolism is related to the interplay between diet and breast cancer (BC) risk. This involves detoxification enzymes, which are polymorphic and metabolise various dietary metabolites. An important characteristic of this pathway is that chemoprotective micronutrients can act not only as substrates but also as inducers for these enzymes. We investigated whether functional GSTP1 (p.Ile105Val-rs1695), NAT2 (590G>A-rs1799930) SNPs and GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms could modulate the effect of the Mediterranean diet (MD) on BC risk, in Greek-Cypriot women.
Methods
Genotyping was performed on women from the MASTOS case–control study of BC in Cyprus. A 32-item food-frequency questionnaire was used to obtain dietary intake information. A dietary pattern, which closely resembles the MD (high loadings of vegetables, fruit, legumes and fish), was previously derived with principal component analysis and was used as our dietary variable.
Results
GSTT1 null genotype increased BC risk compared with the homozygous non-null GSTT1 genotype (OR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.01–1.45). Increasing adherence to the MD reduced BC risk in women with at least one GSTP1 Ile allele (OR for Ile/Ile = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.74–0.95, for Ile/Val = 0.73, 95 % CI 0.62–0.85) or one NAT2 590G allele (OR for 590 GG = 0.73, 95 % CI 0.63–0.83, for 590 GA = 0.81, 95 % CI 0.70–0.94). p interaction values were not, however, statistically significant.
Conclusion
The homozygous null GSTT1 genotype could be a risk allele for BC among Greek-Cypriot women. The anticarcinogenic effects of the high adherence to MD against BC risk could also be further enhanced when combined with the wild-type alleles of the detoxification GSTP1 or NAT2 SNPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The protective role of the Mediterranean diet (MD) against breast cancer (BC) risk has previously been evidenced in various epidemiological studies [1, 2]. The MD is characterised by a high intake of fruit, vegetables and legumes, which make it a rich source of carotenoids, phenolic compounds, terpenes, glutathione and glucosinolates [3–5]. These micronutrients are well known for their chemopreventive effect on BC [6]. The MD is also characterised by moderate amounts of fish intake that contain adequate n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [5], shown to inhibit breast tumour growth (in vivo and in vitro) through the lipid peroxidation products of the marine n-3 PUFAs [7]. We have previously shown that a dietary pattern rich in vegetables, fruit, legumes and fish reduces the risk of post-menopausal BC in the Greek-Cypriot female population of the study with the acronym MASTOS (Greek word for breast) [8].
Xenobiotic metabolism is one of the pathways that is related to the interplay between diet and BC risk. It involves key phase II detoxification enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and N-acetyltransferases (NATs). These enzymes play an important role in the metabolism and detoxification of xenobiotics, which are released from the activity of phase I enzymes [9]. Phase I enzymes, such as cytochrome P450 family of enzymes, catalyse the activation of procarcinogens to carcinogens [10]. The main function of the xenobiotic pathway is to convert carcinogens into water-soluble and readily excretable forms, through their conjugation with polar moieties. This conversion results from the action of the families of GST and NAT enzymes [10]. GSTs conjugate with the antioxidant glutathione to metabolise compounds that are either mutagenic (e.g. heterocyclic aromatic amines) or anticarcinogenic (e.g. glucosinolates) [11]. NAT enzymes use acetyl-CoA as a co-factor and can detoxify active mutagens via acetylation [12, 13]. In addition, micronutrients derived from fruit and vegetables, such as isothiocyanates, indoles and allylic compounds, have been shown to reduce cellular carcinogenicity by inducing the expression of these detoxification enzymes [10]. Therefore, isothiocyanates have a dual role as substrates and as inducers of these detoxifying enzymes.
GST and NAT enzymes have a number of isoenzymes, and many of the coding genes for these isoenzymes are polymorphic. Genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms-SNPs) present in GST and NAT genes might be associated with functional changes, ranging from a complete loss to a reduction in enzymatic activity [9]. GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 isoenzymes are commonly investigated in nutrigenetics studies. GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms result in complete loss of enzymatic activity [14], whereas other SNPs such as the GSTP1 p.Ile105Val (c.313A>G) (rs1695) have been shown to reduce enzymatic activity [11, 15]. The NAT2 c.590G>A (p.Arg197Gln) (rs1799930) SNP causes the enzyme to be a slow metaboliser of active mutagens. Thus, reduced activity of GST and NAT isoenzymes would result in an inefficient elimination of carcinogens, which could in turn increase susceptibility to cancer [9]. In this study, we focused on those aforementioned SNPs of the GST and NAT isoenzymes, which have been shown to be functional [16].
There are also studies investigating SNPs in other isoenzymes of the GST and NAT families, such as the GSTA1 and 2, GSTO1 and 2, GSTM2 and 3, GSTZ1 and NAT1 and their role in BC risk. However, these studies are few and they have mostly presented non-statistically significant results. When examining the relationship between polymorphisms, nutrition and cancer risk, the GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms are the most commonly studied genetic variants of the phase II detoxification metabolism in cancer nutrigenetics [9, 10]. Based on their functional role, it has been evidenced that the association between BC risk and diet can be modified by the SNP genotypes [17, 18]. This may in part explain the inconclusive results obtained when studying the associations between diet and BC risk, without considering the SNP genotypes of the participants [19, 20]. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the effect of a dietary pattern, which combines more than one food group, on BC risk, could be modified by GST and NAT2 SNPs. To our knowledge, such as an aspect has not been examined previously. A dietary pattern, such as the MD, has a number of advantages when used as the dietary variable in nutrigenetics studies as we reported elsewhere [21, 22]. Here, we examined the association between four polymorphisms and BC risk, using the population of the MASTOS study. The four polymorphisms examined were the GSTP1 p.Ile105Val, NAT2 590G>A SNPs and GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms. Furthermore, we assessed the interactions between the aforementioned polymorphisms and a Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP), which was obtained previously [8], with respect to BC risk. Moreover, we assessed the associations between BC risk and the MDP, when stratified by the genotypes of the four polymorphisms.
Participants and methods
Participants
MASTOS was a population-based case–control study of BC in Cyprus, which recruited 1109 female BC cases, aged 40–70 years, and 1177 controls of the same age range. All participants were recruited between the years 2004 and 2006. Cases were women with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of BC (diagnosed between January 1999 and December 2006). Controls were women with no prior history of BC, who participated in the national mammography population screening programme and had a negative result. Blood samples were collected from both cases and controls. More information on the purpose, design of the study, data collection and study population was described elsewhere [23, 24].
Dietary intake assessment
Standardised interviews were performed with each participant in order to answer an interviewer-administered questionnaire, especially designed to collect extensive demographic and risk factor data [8, 23]. Dietary intake data were collected using an interviewer-administered food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) comprising 32 food and beverage items, through a standardised diet interview. This FFQ aimed to record the routine consumption of foods of the participants over the preceding year (for cases, this was the past 12 months prior to diagnosis). More details about the design and structure of the FFQ can be found in Demetriou et al. [8]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was previously used to investigate the dietary consumption of food items (in g/month) included in the FFQ and also to derive the dietary pattern that best applies to the Greek-Cypriot female population. This analysis was performed on the control subjects. Diagonal (direct oblimin) rotation was used to extract principal components. Orthogonal rotations failed to generate interpretable results as they assume independence of components, an assumption that does not hold for dietary patterns. The adherence of subjects to each dietary pattern was estimated using a component score for each subject, based on all factor loadings and the respective monthly consumption of each food. Eleven components were originally found based on an eigenvalue criterion of >1.0 and scree plot analysis. After interpretability of the factors of the various components, the retention of only four components was justified, as components five to eleven revealed high factor loadings on single variables. Only these four factors were thus retained to repeat the PCA. Each of the four retained components corresponded to a different dietary pattern: pattern 1—meat/potatoes, pattern 2—cereals/milk/dairy, pattern 3—cakes/sweets/nuts/crackers/pasta/rice and pattern 4—vegetables/fruit/legumes/fish. Among the 32 food items, 23.6 % of the total variance was explained by the four factors (8.05, 5.92, 5.10 and 4.55 % for the four patterns, respectively). It was concluded that the dietary pattern 4 included high loadings of vegetables, fruit, legumes and fish, closely resembled the MDP. Consequently, pattern 4 was selected as being the most appropriate to be used in the subsequent association analysis with BC and in the analysis with the SNPs in this study. Quartile values for adherence to this dietary pattern were determined, according to score values of the controls [8]. Subjects in quartile 1 had the lowest consumption of vegetables, fruit, legumes and fish and thus lowest adherence to the PCA-derived dietary pattern. In contrast, subjects in quartile 4 had the highest consumption of the same four food groups and therefore the highest adherence to this dietary pattern.
Genotyping
Genotyping of the GSTP1 c.313A>C (p.Ile105Val) and NAT2 c.590G>A SNPs was carried out in all study participants (1109 cases and 1177 controls) with TaqMan SNP genotyping assays and the ABI PRISM 7900HT real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc.). TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix and 30 ng of genomic DNA were used in a final reaction volume of 5 μl for each assay. Genotyping was performed using 384-well plates as described in Kakkoura et al. [21, 22]. The order of DNA samples from cases and controls on the 384-well plate was randomised, in order to ensure that samples from cases and controls were subjected to the same study conditions. Genotyping of the deletion GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms was carried out in all study participants using the multiplex PCR method as described elsewhere with the only modification that part of exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene was used as an internal control [25]. To ensure good quality control practices, 20 % of the samples were genotyped in duplicate. These samples had exactly the same genotyping results. Genotyping call rates for the four polymorphisms under study (GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2) ranged between 95 and 99 % (2256, 2215, 2170 and 2267 participants were successfully genotyped for the GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms, respectively, and were included in the subsequent statistical analysis). Duplicate concordance rates were higher than 99 %.
Statistical analysis
Differences in categorical sociodemographic characteristics, potential risk factors and PCA-derived dietary patterns among cases and controls were assessed using the Chi-square test. A Chi-square test was also carried out to examine Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the controls. P values, which were smaller than 0.05 (<0.05), were considered to be statistically significant. Associations between each SNP and BC were investigated with the use of logistic regression. These associations were adjusted for menopausal status (pre- or post-menopausal) and age. Logistic regression was also used to assess: (a) the interactions between each SNP genotype and each quartile (1–4) of the PCA-derived MDP on BC risk within a multiplicative model and (b) the associations between PCA-derived MDP quartiles and BC stratified by each SNP genotype. Additionally, associations between SNP genotypes and BC risk stratified by the quartiles of the PCA-derived MDP were investigated. However, there were no additional significant associations, and thus, they will not be discussed further (Supplementary Table 1). Regarding interaction analyses, multiplicative interaction terms included products of scores for SNP genotypes (0, for homozygous wild-type genotype; 1, for homozygous variant genotype and 2, for heterozygous genotype) and dietary pattern quartiles (1, for quartile 1; 2, for quartile 2; 3, for quartile 3; and 4, for quartile 4). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of BC risk for all associations were adjusted for menopausal status and age as well as for the other three dietary patterns of the PCA (patterns 1, 2 and 3) that were derived previously [8]. Age was treated as a continuous variable, and menopausal status, PCA-derived dietary pattern data and SNP data were treated as categorical variables in the statistical model of logistic regression. In addition to age, menopausal status and PCA-derived dietary pattern data (patterns 1, 2 and 3), ORs were adjusted for other potential confounding factors that best predict BC risk in this study population (family history of BC, age at menarche, hormone replacement therapy use, breastfeeding and age at the first full-term pregnancy) [23]. Nevertheless, further adjusting for these five potential confounders did not change any of the ORs by greater than 10 %. Hence, those factors are not included in the adjustments of the ORs presented here. A likelihood ratio test was used to compare regression models with and without SNPs–PCA-derived MDP interaction terms, in order to derive overall p interaction values for assessing the significance of interactions between SNPs and dietary pattern in relation to BC risk. These regression models were also adjusted for menopausal status, age and for the other three dietary patterns of the PCA (patterns 1, 2 and 3). PCA-derived MDP was also treated as a continuous variable to assess association between this PCA-derived dietary pattern and BC, stratified by genotypes of the SNPs. These associations were adjusted further for the categorical variable of the menopausal status and for the continuous variables of age and PCA-derived dietary patterns 1, 2 and 3. Outliers were removed from this analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 (SPSS, PASW Inc., Chicago, Illinois), STATA version 11 (StatCorp.2007. College Station, TX) and SNPStats, which is a web-based software, designed for the analysis of genetic association studies [26].
Results
Characteristics and frequencies of GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms
The genotype frequencies of the GSTP1 p.Ile105Val and NAT2 590G>A SNPs among the control group did not deviate from HWE (Table 1). GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms could not be tested for HWE since there were only two categories of genotypes. Genotype and allele frequencies of the four polymorphisms in cases and controls are given in Table 1. Characteristics of the 1109 BC cases and 1177 controls of the MASTOS study, including the four PCA-derived dietary patterns, are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Differences in the distribution of the variables between cases and controls were discussed previously [23].
GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer
The associations between GSTP1 p.Ile105Val, NAT2 590G>A, GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms and BC risk are given in Table 2. Women homozygous for the GSTT1 null allele demonstrated a statistically significant increased BC risk, when compared to women homozygous for the wild-type GSTT1 allele. Associations between the other three polymorphisms studied and BC risk were not statistically significant (Table 2).
Interaction analyses between principal component analysis-derived Mediterranean dietary pattern, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms and breast cancer
None of the four polymorphisms studied (GSTP1 p.Ile105Val, NAT2 590G>A, GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms) interacted significantly with the PCA-derived MDP, since the overall p interaction values were not statistically significant (Table 3).
Associations between principal component analysis-derived Mediterranean dietary pattern and breast cancer risk, stratified by the GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and NAT2 genotypes
A statistically significant decreased BC risk was evidenced in GSTP1 Ile/Ile and Ile/Val women with increasing adherence to the PCA-derived dietary pattern (continuous variable) (Table 4). High adherence to the PCA-derived dietary pattern also decreased significantly BC risk of the NAT2 590GG and 590GA women. Thus, it is likely that the protective effect of the MDP becomes stronger as the number of wild-type NAT2 590G alleles increases. Additionally, increasing adherence to the PCA-derived MDP resulted in a significantly lower risk for BC in both genotypes (non-null and null) of both GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. No statistically significant associations were observed between the PCA-derived pattern and BC risk for the carriers of the variant alleles of the GSTP1 (Val/Val) and NAT2 (590AA) SNPs (Table 4).
Discussion
In this nutrigenetics study, we examined the associations between four polymorphisms in phase II detoxification enzymes (GSTP1 p.Ile105Val, NAT2 590G>A, GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms) and BC risk, as well as the interactions between each of these SNPs and the MDP on BC risk. When examining the adjusted associations between BC risk and the four polymorphisms under study, it was shown that the null genotype of the GSTT1 polymorphism statistically significantly increased BC risk in Greek-Cypriot women, which is in agreement with the results of two recent meta-analyses [27, 28]. This finding might be biologically significant since the null GSTT1 genotype has been shown to result in the loss of the enzyme and thus in the loss of the enzymatic detoxification activity, which protects against reactive carcinogenic metabolites. Many of these cytotoxic products can cause DNA damage, and hence, individuals with the null GSTT1 genotype might have an increased BC risk [28, 29]. No associations between BC risk and the remaining three polymorphisms (GSTP1 p.Ile105Val, NAT2 590G>A and GSTM1 deletion polymorphism) were found, which is also in line with previous meta-analyses [30–34].
In the interaction analyses, non-statistically significant overall p interaction values were obtained, i.e. the association between MDP and BC does not depend on SNPs genotypes and vice versa. Even though there was no statistically significant interaction between MDP and SNPs with respect to BC risk, the investigation of the association analyses between the MDP and BC risk stratified by genotypes of the SNPs showed statistically significant results. A high adherence to the PCA-derived dietary pattern significantly reduced BC risk in women with at least one GSTP1 Ile allele. Increasing adherence to the PCA-derived MDP also decreased BC risk in women with at least one NAT2 590G allele. The effect was stronger in the homozygous wild-type NAT2 590GG genotype. These statistically significant associations suggest that the GSTP1 p.Ile105Val and the NAT2 590G>A SNPs could modulate the association between the MDP and BC risk, acting as effect modifiers on this association. Thus, the wild-type GSTP1 Ile or NAT2 590G alleles could enhance the beneficial and protective effect of the high adherence to the PCA-derived MDP, against BC risk in Greek-Cypriot women, resulting in a synergistic effect. Furthermore, high adherence to the MDP reduced significantly BC risk in both homozygous non-null and null genotypes of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. These statistically significant associations suggest that the observed decreased BC risk is due to the effect of the MDP, irrespective of the modifying effect of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms.
The interplay between bioactive phytochemicals and phase II metabolising enzymes might be important in BC development, as shown by our results and those of previous studies [35–37]. In our study, the statistically significant decreased BC risk associated with a high adherence to the PCA-derived MDP is more evident in the wild-type GSTP1 Ile/Ile and NAT2 590GG women. These findings could be explained by the fact that in the wild-type genotypes of the GSTP1 and NAT2 SNPs, the enzymes maintain their normal detoxification activity, and thus, they are more efficient in detoxifying carcinogens compared with the variant SNP genotypes (GSTP1 Val/Val and NAT2 590AA) (Fig. 1). Additionally, the high intake of MD plant-based foods and thus of isothiocyanates, indoles [4, 38] and other antioxidants would induce the expression of the wild-type GSTP1 and NAT2 enzymes, and consequently, the detoxification enzymatic activity would be further enhanced [3, 10, 14]. These phase II enzymes detoxify toxic electrophiles and reactive species (e.g. diols, nitrosamines, organic epoxides, hydroperoxides and unsaturated aldehydes) produced from the activity of phase I enzymes [12, 39]. Increased enzymatic detoxification would result in an increased excretion and clearance of carcinogens and in a reduced exposure of the target tissue to carcinogen-induced DNA damage. Evidence by previous studies also suggests that isothiocyanates inhibit phase I activating enzymes, leading to reduced activation of procarcinogens [40, 41]. Therefore, initiation and promotion of carcinogenesis are inhibited by these events [29], resulting in a decreased BC risk (Fig. 1).
In addition, phase II enzymes catalyse the conjugation of either glutathione in the case of GSTs or acetyl-CoA in the case of NATs to electrophilic compounds converting them into water-soluble species. Therefore, dietary metabolites such as the isothiocyanates are not only inducers but also substrates of GSTs, the action of which leads to their elimination from the body [14] (Fig. 1). In the case of N-acetylation, aromatic and heterocyclic amines act as substrates and are inactivated by the NAT2 enzyme [12]. Previous studies showed that individuals with GSTM1 or GSTT1 null genotypes or GSTP1 Val/Val alleles, who exhibit no or decreased enzymatic activity, are less efficient in the elimination of phytochemicals, leading to a prolonged accumulation of chemopreventive micronutrients in the body. The presence of prolonged and high levels of bioactive phytochemicals in these carriers induces the activity of the detoxification GST enzymes and thus increases protection against cancer [12, 14, 37]. Another study on bladder cancer risk showed that individuals with a NAT2 slow acetylator genotype might benefit from the high intake of cruciferous vegetables [12]. Nevertheless, in the Greek-Cypriot population we did not observe any statistically significant associations between the MDP and the variant GSTP1 Val/Val and NAT2 590AA genotypes on cancer risk, results that are in agreement with earlier studies [29, 36, 42]. This inconsistency between various studies may be due to different dietary exposures and population differences [14, 43]. Based on our significant findings on the wild-type GSTP1 Ile/Ile and NAT2 590GG SNPs, we hypothesise that the inducing effects of the MD nutrients on the expression of the enzymes might play a more important role in protection against cancer, compared with the eliminating effects of the nutrients themselves, as explained above and supported by others [35, 37, 43–46].
Moreover, the PCA-derived MDP used in our study is rich in fish, besides plant-based food groups. The anticarcinogenic effect of fish could be exerted through the cellular action of marine n-3 PUFAs [39]. N-3 PUFAs can modulate tumour growth and decrease BC risk by reacting with the endogenous free radicals to form lipid peroxidation products, which in turn cause apoptosis of cancerous cells [7, 47]. The lipid hydroperoxides act as substrates for the metabolising GST and NAT enzymes, which detoxify them [7]. As aforementioned, the high adherence to the PCA-derived MDP significantly decreased BC risk in the Greek-Cypriot carriers of the GSTP1 Ile/Ile and NAT2 590GG alleles. The high adherence to the MDP could ensure the presence of adequate levels of fish n-3 PUFAs (Supplementary Table 3) and hence of lipid peroxidation. This appears to enhance the triggering of apoptosis of tumour cells [39], even if the GSTP1 and NAT2 enzymes at the wild-type genotypes of the SNPs (GSTP1 Ile/Ile and NAT2 590GG) would eliminate the peroxidation products efficiently. Hence, we hypothesise that the high intake of marine n-3 PUFAs might be able to compensate for the lipid peroxidation products detoxified by the GSTP1 Ile/Ile and NAT2 590GG enzymes. In contrast to our results, a study on women with the combined GSTM1 null and GSTP1 low activity genotypes and marine n-3 fatty acid intake revealed a reduced BC risk and no associations with the high activity GST genotypes [7]. The sample size of this study was smaller compared to our study’s sample size, and this might be the reason behind this inconsistency. Further studies are needed in order to explain these contrasting observations.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which examined the effects of these particular SNPs on the GST and NAT detoxification enzymes and on cancer risk, in association with a dietary pattern that includes a combination of more than two food groups (not only vegetables and fruit but also legumes and fish). A dietary intake combining those four food groups included in the PCA-derived dietary pattern could contain ample quantities of anticarcinogenic micronutrients and marine n-3 PUFAs, as opposed to a single nutrient intake (Supplementary Table 3). Hence, the PCA-derived dietary pattern has the advantage of closely resembling the MD and thus of representing a more comprehensive dietary variable to study, rather than examining the effect of single isolated micronutrients. Further strengths of this study are the large sample size and the homogeneous sample of subjects in terms of ethnic background [8, 48]. Selection and survival biases could be possible limitations of the study, as discussed previously [8, 48]. An additional limitation is the fact that the FFQ used in our study examined only 32 food and beverage items, which is a limited number for a typical FFQ. In addition, information about the means of consumption or preparation for each dietary item and about the intake of dietary supplements was not taken into account. Therefore, some of the food items that could contribute significantly to the dietary habits of the Greek-Cypriot population might be missing. Furthermore, the methods of processing and cooking of vegetables, legumes and fish complicate more the assessment of the exposure to the specific anticarcinogenic MD nutrients under study [29]. A further limitation of the FFQ is possible misclassification in the assessment of dietary intake, due to recall bias, an unfortunate but inevitable caveat of case control studies. However, it is not expected to be a big issue in the examination of gene–environment interactions, as the relevant risk of bias with respect to genotype is minimal [37, 49, 50]. Moreover, the relative quantitative range of anticarcinogenic nutrients included in the foods most heavily weighted in the PCA-derived MDP was based on information reported in the literature and in a food database [3–5, 38, 51] without being measured in the serum. Additionally, how bioavailable are the phytochemical compounds (e.g. isothiocyanates) and how they are distributed upon ingestion in vivo is still unclear [14, 29]. PCA has some subjective limitations, including the derived variables used in the analysis, the number of the extracted factors, the type of the rotation used and the labelling of the retained factors. A small amount of variance (4.55 % of the total variance in the 32 FFQ items) was also explained by the component derived from the PCA used in the current study [8]. Nonetheless, this low variance amount is typical in dietary studies analysed by PCA, as shown by the limitations of reducing the highly interrelated dietary variables [52].
In conclusion, our statistically significant association results show that the GSTT1 null genotype increases BC risk and that a high adherence to the PCA-derived MDP reduces BC risk in women with at least one GSTP1 Ile allele or with at least one NAT2 590 G allele. These results suggest that the GSTT1 null genotype could be a risk allele for developing BC and that both the GSTP1 p.Ile105Val and the NAT2 590G>A SNPs may act as effect modifiers on the association between the PCA-derived MDP and BC risk in the Greek-Cypriot female population. The high intake of the anticarcinogenic components of the MD in combination with the wild-type GSTP1 Ile or NAT2 590 G alleles seems to play a synergistic role in the prevention of BC development through the detoxification pathway, with the GSTP1 Ile or NAT2 590G alleles enhancing this protective MD effect. Further studies should include quantification of the levels of anticarcinogenic, antioxidant and oxidative stress-related metabolites in the serum of these subjects, in order to further assess the associations observed and clarify their role in breast carcinogenesis. Also, studying GST and NAT2 SNPs with the tag SNPs approach will allow us to capture a more complete genetic coverage for the genetic variants assessed in the association analyses between the MD and BC risk. Additionally, as the detoxification enzymes of the xenobiotic metabolism have been shown to be involved in the regulation of DNA damage [9], it would be interesting to assess the combined effects of the GST, NAT and DNA repair SNPs (studied previously in the MASTOS participants [24, 48]), on BC risk as well as to assess these effects on the MD and BC risk association. This kind of information generated through the nutrigenomics studies might help to further investigate the mechanism(s) of action of the protective components of the MD in vivo.
References
Albuquerque RC, Baltar VT, Marchioni DM (2014) Breast cancer and dietary patterns: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 72(1):1–17. doi:10.1111/nure.12083
Brennan SF, Cantwell MM, Cardwell CR, Velentzis LS, Woodside JV (2010) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 91(5):1294–1302. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28796
Gerber M (2003) Biofactors in the Mediterranean diet. Clin Chem Lab Med 41(8):999–1004. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2003.153
Ortega R (2006) Importance of functional foods in the Mediterranean diet. Public Health Nutr 9(8A):1136–1140. doi:10.1017/s1368980007668530
Simopoulos AP (2004) The traditional diet of Greece and cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 13(3):219–230
Vera-Ramirez L, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, Sanchez-Rovira P, Ramirez-Tortosa CL, Granados-Principal S, Lorente JA, Quiles JL (2013) Impact of diet on breast cancer risk: a review of experimental and observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53(1):49–75. doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.521600
Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, Sun CL, Van Den Berg D, Koh WP, Lee HP, Yu MC (2004) Marine n-3 fatty acid intake, glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal Chinese women in Singapore. Carcinogenesis 25(11):2143–2147. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgh230
Demetriou CA, Hadjisavvas A, Loizidou MA, Loucaides G, Neophytou I, Sieri S, Kakouri E, Middleton N, Vineis P, Kyriacou K (2012) The mediterranean dietary pattern and breast cancer risk in Greek-Cypriot women: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 12:113. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-113
Reszka E, Wasowicz W, Gromadzinska J (2006) Genetic polymorphism of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes, diet and cancer susceptibility. Br J Nutr 96(4):609–619
Steck SE, Hebert JR (2009) GST polymorphism and excretion of heterocyclic aromatic amine and isothiocyanate metabolites after Brassica consumption. Environ Mol Mutagen 50(3):238–246. doi:10.1002/em.20456
Lampe JW (2009) Interindividual differences in response to plant-based diets: implications for cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 89(5):1553S–1557S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736D
Lin J, Kamat A, Gu J, Chen M, Dinney CP, Forman MR, Wu X (2009) Dietary intake of vegetables and fruits and the modification effects of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on bladder cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(7):2090–2097. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1174
Wang J, Joshi AD, Corral R, Siegmund KD, Marchand LL, Martinez ME, Haile RW, Ahnen DJ, Sandler RS, Lance P, Stern MC (2012) Carcinogen metabolism genes, red meat and poultry intake, and colorectal cancer risk. Int J Cancer 130(8):1898–1907. doi:10.1002/ijc.26199
Steinbrecher A, Rohrmann S, Timofeeva M, Risch A, Jansen E, Linseisen J (2010) Dietary glucosinolate intake, polymorphisms in selected biotransformation enzymes, and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(1):135–143. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0660
Ali-Osman F, Akande O, Antoun G, Mao JX, Buolamwini J (1997) Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of full-length cDNAs of three human glutathione S-transferase Pi gene variants. Evidence for differential catalytic activity of the encoded proteins. J Biol Chem 272(15):10004–10012
Jancova P, Anzenbacher P, Anzenbacherova E (2010) Phase II drug metabolizing enzymes. Biomed Pap 154(2):103–116
Seow A, Vainio H, Yu MC (2005) Effect of glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms on the cancer preventive potential of isothiocyanates: an epidemiological perspective. Mutat Res 592(1–2):58–67. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.06.004
Egeberg R, Olsen A, Autrup H, Christensen J, Stripp C, Tetens I, Overvad K, Tjonneland A (2008) Meat consumption, N-acetyl transferase 1 and 2 polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in Danish postmenopausal women. Eur J Cancer Prev 17(1):39–47. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32809b4cdd
Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G (2014) Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cancer 135(8):1884–1897. doi:10.1002/ijc.28824
Aune D, Chan DS, Vieira AR, Rosenblatt DA, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Norat T (2012) Fruits, vegetables and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134(2):479–493. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2118-1
Kakkoura MG, Demetriou CA, Loizidou MA, Loucaides G, Neophytou I, Marcou Y, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriacou K (2015) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in one-carbon metabolism genes, Mediterranean diet and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in the Greek-Cypriot female population. Genes Nutr 10(2):453. doi:10.1007/s12263-015-0453-7
Kakkoura MG, Demetriou CA, Loizidou MA, Loucaides G, Neophytou I, Malas S, Kyriacou K, Hadjisavvas A (2015) MnSOD and CAT polymorphisms modulate the effect of the Mediterranean diet on breast cancer risk among Greek-Cypriot women. Eur J Nutr. doi:10.1007/s00394-015-0971-5
Hadjisavvas A, Loizidou MA, Middleton N, Michael T, Papachristoforou R, Kakouri E, Daniel M, Papadopoulos P, Malas S, Marcou Y, Kyriacou K (2010) An investigation of breast cancer risk factors in Cyprus: a case control study. BMC Cancer 10:447. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-447
Loizidou MA, Cariolou MA, Neuhausen SL, Newbold RF, Bashiardes E, Marcou Y, Michael T, Daniel M, Kakouri E, Papadopoulos P, Malas S, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriacou K (2010) Genetic variation in genes interacting with BRCA1/2 and risk of breast cancer in the Cypriot population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121(1):147–156. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0518-7
Ambrosone CB, Sweeney C, Coles BF, Thompson PA, McClure GY, Korourian S, Fares MY, Stone A, Kadlubar FF, Hutchins LF (2001) Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and survival after treatment for breast cancer. Cancer Res 61(19):7130–7135
Sole X, Guino E, Valls J, Iniesta R, Moreno V (2006) SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics 22(15):1928–1929. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl268
Sergentanis TN, Economopoulos KP (2010) GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121(1):195–202. doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0520-0
Chen XX, Zhao RP, Qiu LX, Yuan H, Mao C, Hu XC, Guo XM (2011) Glutathione S-transferase T1 polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Cytokine 56(2):477–480. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2011.06.008
Karen-Ng LP, Marhazlinda J, Rahman ZA, Yang YH, Jalil N, Cheong SC, Zain RB (2011) Combined effects of isothiocyanate intake, glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and risk habits for age of oral squamous cell carcinoma development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12(5):1161–1166
Liu JJ, Liu JL, Zhang X, Xie L, Zeng J (2013) A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep 40(4):3203–3212. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-2396-z
Vogl FD, Taioli E, Maugard C, Zheng W, Pinto LF, Ambrosone C, Parl FF, Nedelcheva-Kristensen V, Rebbeck TR, Brennan P, Boffetta P (2004) Glutathione S-transferases M1, T1, and P1 and breast cancer: a pooled analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(9):1473–1479
Zhang J, Qiu LX, Wang ZH, Wang JL, He SS, Hu XC (2010) NAT2 polymorphisms combining with smoking associated with breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123(3):877–883. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0807-1
Lu S, Wang Z, Cui D, Liu H, Hao X (2011) Glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 34,658 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 125(1):253–259. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0969-x
Ochs-Balcom HM, Wiesner G, Elston RC (2007) A meta-analysis of the association of N-acetyltransferase 2 gene (NAT2) variants with breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 166(3):246–254. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm066
Lee SA, Fowke JH, Lu W, Ye C, Zheng Y, Cai Q, Gu K, Gao YT, Shu XO, Zheng W (2008) Cruciferous vegetables, the GSTP1 Ile105Val genetic polymorphism, and breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 87(3):753–760
Fowke JH, Chung FL, Jin F, Qi D, Cai Q, Conaway C, Cheng JR, Shu XO, Gao YT, Zheng W (2003) Urinary isothiocyanate levels, brassica, and human breast cancer. Cancer Res 63(14):3980–3986
Steck SE, Gaudet MM, Britton JA, Teitelbaum SL, Terry MB, Neugut AI, Santella RM, Gammon MD (2007) Interactions among GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms, cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 28(9):1954–1959. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm141
Perez-Lopez FR, Chedraui P, Haya J, Cuadros JL (2009) Effects of the Mediterranean diet on longevity and age-related morbid conditions. Maturitas 64(2):67–79. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.013
Gago-Dominguez M, Jiang X, Castelao JE (2007) Lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress genes and dietary factors in breast cancer protection: a hypothesis. Breast Cancer Res 9(1):201. doi:10.1186/bcr1628
Navarro SL, Li F, Lampe JW (2011) Mechanisms of action of isothiocyanates in cancer chemoprevention: an update. Food Funct 2(10):579–587. doi:10.1039/c1fo10114e
Ambrosone CB, Tang L (2009) Cruciferous vegetable intake and cancer prevention: role of nutrigenetics. Cancer Prev Res 2(4):298–300. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0037
Zhao H, Lin J, Grossman HB, Hernandez LM, Dinney CP, Wu X (2007) Dietary isothiocyanates, GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2 polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk. Int J Cancer 120(10):2208–2213. doi:10.1002/ijc.22549
Gervasini G, San Jose C, Carrillo JA, Benitez J, Cabanillas A (2010) GST polymorphisms interact with dietary factors to modulate lung cancer risk: study in a high-incidence area. Nutr Cancer 62(6):750–758. doi:10.1080/01635581003605946
Wang LI, Giovannucci EL, Hunter D, Neuberg D, Su L, Christiani DC (2004) Dietary intake of Cruciferous vegetables, Glutathione S-transferase (GST) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in a Caucasian population. Cancer Causes Control 15(10):977–985
Joseph MA, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL, Shields PG, Bowman ED, Zhang Y, Marshall JR, Ambrosone CB (2004) Cruciferous vegetables, genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1, and prostate cancer risk. Nutr Cancer 50(2):206–213. doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5002_11
Spitz MR, Duphorne CM, Detry MA, Pillow PC, Amos CI, Lei L, de Andrade M, Gu X, Hong WK, Wu X (2000) Dietary intake of isothiocyanates: evidence of a joint effect with glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 9(10):1017–1020
Larsson SC, Kumlin M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Wolk A (2004) Dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: a review of potential mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 79(6):935–945
Loizidou MA, Michael T, Neuhausen SL, Newbold RF, Marcou Y, Kakouri E, Daniel M, Papadopoulos P, Malas S, Hadjisavvas A, Kyriacou K (2009) DNA-repair genetic polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer in Cyprus. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115(3):623–627. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0084-4
Turner F, Smith G, Sachse C, Lightfoot T, Garner RC, Wolf CR, Forman D, Bishop DT, Barrett JH (2004) Vegetable, fruit and meat consumption and potential risk modifying genes in relation to colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 112(2):259–264. doi:10.1002/ijc.20404
Skjelbred CF, Saebo M, Hjartaker A, Grotmol T, Hansteen IL, Tveit KM, Hoff G, Kure EH (2007) Meat, vegetables and genetic polymorphisms and the risk of colorectal carcinomas and adenomas. BMC Cancer 7:228. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-228
FNDDS U (2011–2012) USDA food and nutrient database for dietary studies: what’s in the foods you eat search tool 2011–2012 [https://reedir.arsnet.usda.gov/codesearchwebapp/%28h1zdt555qfcnfm55pjp44h45%29/codesearch.aspx]
Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng CC, Stanczyk FZ, Pike MC (2009) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian American women. Am J Clin Nutr 89(4):1145–1154. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26915
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by “Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation” grants 0104/13, 0104/17 and the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics. Maria G. Kakkoura is funded by the Eurobank Cyprus Scholarship provided through the Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine. Further, we would like to thank all the study participants and acknowledge the help of the following cancer patient’s organisations: the Pancyprian Association of Cancer Patients and Friends, Europa Donna Cyprus, the Cyprus Anticancer Society as well as Dr Vaios Partasides, director of the National breast cancer screening programme and his team. We also would like to express our appreciation to Doctors Eleni Kakouri, Panayiotis Papadopoulos, Yiola Marcou and Simon Malas as well as to all the nurses and volunteers who provided valuable help towards the recruitment of the study participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standards
The study was approved by the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kakkoura, M.G., Loizidou, M.A., Demetriou, C.A. et al. The synergistic effect between the Mediterranean diet and GSTP1 or NAT2 SNPs decreases breast cancer risk in Greek-Cypriot women. Eur J Nutr 56, 545–555 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1099-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1099-3