Abstract
Aims
For patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation to achieve rhythm control is an important therapeutic option. The atrial mechanical dispersion measured as standard deviation of the time to peak strain (SD-TPS) is associated with the risk of AF recurrence following catheter ablation.
Methods
The study cohort prospectively enrolled n = 132 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (n = 88) or persistent AF (n = 44) presenting for de novo pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and followed for 1 year. We related left atrial (LA) volume, LA ejection fraction, SD-TPS, and global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle and clinical variables (sex, age, and type of AF) to AF recurrence.
Results
Kaplan–Meier curves showed higher AF recurrence rate with an increase of SD-TPS with the calculated cut-off of 38.6 ms. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis could show that SD-TPS had the highest relevance regarding AF recurrence with a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.01) and HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.02) per 10 ms increase. In the additional analyses for the model including the clinical variables age, sex, and type of AF with paroxysmal or persisting AF, SD-TPS did only show a trend and after adjusting for covariates, SD-TPS showed a HR of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.99; 1.09, p = 0.09) per 10 ms increase.
Conclusion
Atrial mechanical dispersion was associated with recurrent AF.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac rhythm disorder among the elderly, with an observed increase in mortality rates for men and women aged over 50 and 60 years, respectively, following an AF diagnosis [1, 2]. Recent studies have shown that strategies focusing on rhythm control, particularly early intervention, result in fewer cardiovascular events in AF patients compared to the standard rate control care [3]. In this regard, catheter ablation has proven more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after 1 year compared to pharmacological treatments, with AF recurrence rates ranging from 25 to 42% [4, 5]. However, it is important to note that while repeat procedures can improve success rates, they also come with higher costs and an increased likelihood of adverse events [1]. Therefore, careful evaluation using additional diagnostic tests is essential when considering catheter ablation for patients. The recent guidelines recommend using transthoracic echocardiography to detect structural cardiac changes associated with AF [1]. As AF is a progressive disease which facilitates its own persistence due to atrial remodeling, left atrial (LA) volume enlargement is a useful parameter to predict AF recurrence [6, 7]. When considering LA remodeling, strain echocardiography can evaluate the local myocardial function, and a decrease in LA strain is linked to the occurrence of AF in both the general population and patients with ischemic stroke [8, 9]. Myocardial strain is as well suitable to evaluate the timing of myocardial contraction, and there is a reported association between left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion and the occurrence of arrhythmias [10]. However, it has also been observed that disturbances in the timing of LA contraction indicate the presence of fibrosis and electrophysiological disorders, which may suggest a high likelihood of AF recurrence, such as intra-atrial dyssynchrony during sinus rhythm as a specific disorder [11]. Recently, a study described the additional value of measuring LA mechanical dispersion as standard deviation of the time to peak strain (SD-TPS) to evaluate the risk of AF recurrence in subjects at risk of developing heart failure [12].
The primary objective of the present study is (1) to examine the association between SD-TPS, a marker of LA mechanical dispersion, and AF recurrence. Additionally, the study aims (2) to assess the influence of SD-TPS in conjunction with other recently proposed imaging variables and clinical factors such as sex, age, and type of AF. These variables are commonly evaluated in various models of AF recurrence after catheter ablation [13].
Methods
The study cohort consisted of 132 patients presenting with AF for the first catheter ablation procedure to the University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, from December 2017 to January 2019. The patients were included into the single-center, observational ASTRA-AF (Left Atrial STRAin in Patients undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Recurrence of Arrhythmia) pilot study (reference number at the ethical commission of the Hamburg Medical Association: PV5835). All patients received transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography prior to catheter ablation. Patients with atrial fibrillation at presentation, poor 2D imaging quality, or impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (< 50%) were excluded. In addition, patients with moderate or severe valvular heart disease were excluded as well. Patients were treated with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoballoon (Cryo) ablation at the discretion of the treating physician. Thus, out of 88 patients with paroxysmal AF (PFA), 40 did receive a RFA and 48 a Cryo ablation and in the 44 patients with persistent AF (PersAF), 33 did receive a RFA and 11 a Cryo ablation. In general, following the publication of previous results of CHASE-AF (Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), the approach favored at the center was to do PVI only [14]. Two patients in the cohort with AF recurrence (one with PAF, one with PersAF) within 1 year were treated with additional linear lesions or CFAE ablation.
After manual tracing of the LA endocardial border, the software Cardiac Performance Analysis (IMAGE-COM, TOMTEC-ARENA, TomTec Imaging System GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany) automatically tracked the myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle. The strain curves of the global and regional LA wall were automatically generated by the software, and the reference point for image analysis was taken at the onset of the QRS complex (R-R gating). LA mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation of time to peak positive strain (SD-TPS) from the three LA segments used by the software. The measurement technique was described previously (Fig. 1) [12]. The LA ejection fraction is determined by the formula: Total emptying fraction (LAVmax − LAVmin) / LAVmax [15]. The additional echocardiography included an assessment of diastolic function, measurement of ventricular diameters and volumes, and a three-dimensional assessment of the left ventricle. All measurements, including strain measurements, were performed according to the current recommendations [16] [17]. The baseline data included the type of antiarrhythmic medication and anticoagulation. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated according to current guideline suggestions [1]. The blanking time was the first 3 months following ablation. After 12 months, all patients were invited to undergo additional transthoracic echocardiography and a 24-h Holter ECG to assess recurrence of AF, current antiarrhythmic medication, and anticoagulation. Further, presence of stroke or need for pacemaker therapy was assessed. Patients who could not attend the follow-up visit were interviewed with a questionnaire and asked to send a current 24-h Holter ECG.
Statistics
Continuous variables are shown as medians (25th percentile–75th percentile) and compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Binary variables are shown as counts (frequencies) and compared using the χ2 test. As this is an explorative study, no adjustments for multiple testing have been done. p-values are given for descriptive reasons only [18]. The median follow-up time was estimated by the reverse Kaplan–Meier estimator, and the event rate was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The primary endpoint is censored at 1 year of follow-up.
Optimal cut-offs are determined using Cox regression and the function cutp from package survMisc to make the choice [19].
Determined groups are analyzed within survival analysis in Kaplan–Meier curves. Groups are compared using the log-rank test.
Univariable Cox regression was performed to identify the association of patient characteristics with the recurrence of AF. All variables with a p-value < 0.25 in univariable regression were chosen for a multivariable model. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) are given. Forest plots display the respective results. The vertical line at an HR of one is the line of no effect.
A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in regression analysis. All analyses rely on complete cases and were performed with R statistical software version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Baseline characteristics
The study cohort consisted of 132 patients (79 males, 59.8%), median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range IQR, 55–73), and median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2 (IQR, 1–3). The patient cohort consisted of 102 (77.3%) patients without and 30 (22.7%) patients with AF recurrence during follow-up (Table 1). Thirteen patients (9.8%) had a history of ischemic stroke and 13 (9.8%) a history of coronary artery disease.
Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, arterial hypertension was present more often in the cohort with AF recurrence with 24 (80.0%) to 54 (52.9%) patients (p = 0.02). Treatment of the patients regarding cardioversion or antiarrhythmic medication was not different in patients with and without recurrence of AF. Oral anticoagulation was prescribed in 77 (75.5%) patients without and 26 (86.7%) patients with AF recurrence (p = 0.29). The energy source used for treatment of the patients in the cohort without and with AF recurrence was not different in this cohort (p = 0.65 for radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation).
The baseline characteristics for the cohorts with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PersAF) are shown in Supplemental Table 1.
Follow-up and recurrence of AF in the overall cohort
The maximum follow-up time was 3.1 years, and the median follow-up time was 801 (95% CI, 776; 835) days. At the censored follow-up time of 12 months, the AF recurrence rate was 22.8%.
Imaging variables in the cohort with and without AF recurrence
Regarding the imaging variables in relation to AF recurrence (Table 2), median LAVI was 29.4 mL/m2 (IQR, 22.8–35.8) in patients without recurrence and 30.7 mL/m2 (IQR, 22.7–35.2) in patients with AF recurrence (p = 0.74). LA ejection fraction was 41.8% (IQR, 33.9–50.5%) and 34.0% (IQR, 29.1–43.7) (p = 0.03) in patients without and with AF recurrence, respectively. For LV global longitudinal strain, the measurements were − 19.7% (IQR, − 22.9 to − 18.0) and − 19.3% (IQR, − 20.9 to − 17.6) for patients without and with AF recurrence (p = 0.15). The measured SD-TPS was significantly different in patients without and with AF recurrence: median 25.3 ms (IQR, 12.7–46.5) vs. 61.1 ms (IQR, 42.6–84.1) (p < 0.001).
Imaging variables in the PAF and PersAF cohort
Imaging variables are presented for the PAF and PersAF cohort in Supplemental Table 2.
The median left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 59.0% (IQR, 53.7–64.2). Regarding LA volume, the median LA volume indexed to BSA (LAVI) was 28.9 mL/m2 (IQR, 21.2–35.0) in patients with PAF and 30.5 mL/m2 (IQR, 25.9–44.2) (p = 0.03) in PersAF. Regarding imaging parameters of diastolic dysfunction, median E/A was 1.2 (IQR, 1.0–1.6) without a relevant difference for PAF and PersAF (p = 0.09) and the same was shown for median E/eʹ with 8.4 (IQR, 6.8–10.5) (p = 0.3). The median measurement of LV global longitudinal strain was − 19.7% (IQR, − 22.1 to − 17.9) for PAF and − 19.4% (IQR, − 21.6 to − 17.8%) for PersAF (p = 0.2), and median LA ejection fraction was 40.9% (IQR, 32.9–50.1) in the PAF cohort and 40.3% (IQR, 25.7–48.7) (p = 0.3) in the PersAF cohort, respectively. Regarding SD-TPS, median measurements were 33.5 ms (IQR, 14.4–49.9) in PAF and 38.7 ms (IQR, 20.6–68.0) in PersAF patients (p = 0.09).
Optimal cut-off selection and results regarding the association of imaging variables with AF recurrence
Regarding the imaging variables, optimal cut-offs for the classification of AF recurrence were calculated. The calculated cut-offs for LAVI were 27.7 mL/m2, for SD-TPS 38.6 ms, for LV global longitudinal strain − 22.2%, and for LA ejection fraction 35.7%. The cut-off values for SD-TPS (p < 0.001), LV global longitudinal strain (p = 0.04), and LA ejection fraction (p = 0.003) show a relevant association with AF recurrence; however, no relevant association of LAVI with AF recurrence could be established (Fig. 2).
Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis regarding the association with the risk of AF recurrence
In univariable Cox regression analysis of the association between imaging variables and AF recurrence, SD-TPS could be identified as a predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] of 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.01) (Fig. 3). The other imaging variables were not associated with the risk of AF recurrence, and of the clinical variables, only “age” was also predictive of a higher AF recurrence risk. In the multivariable analysis model including the imaging variables, the association with the risk of AF recurrence resulted in a HR of 1.05 (95% CI 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.011) for SD-TPS, while the other included variables did not show an association with the risk of the event. In the multivariable analysis including all the clinical variables, “age” was again the only variable predictive of AF recurrence (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02, 1.11; p = 0.002), while SD-TPS only showed a trend towards higher AF recurrence risk (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.10; p = 0.07) (Fig. 3).
Discussion
In a prospective study utilizing advanced echocardiographic assessments, we have demonstrated the following findings: (1) Atrial mechanical dispersion, as indicated by SD-TPS, is associated with an elevated risk of AF recurrence. (2) On the other hand, left atrial volume index (LAVI) was not associated with the risk of AF recurrence. (3) By establishing a cut-off value of 38.6 ms for SD-TPS, it may be possible to identify patients who are at a higher risk of experiencing AF recurrence. (4) Following catheter ablation using either radiofrequency or cryoballoon techniques, the rate of AF recurrence after 1 year of follow-up was relatively low at 23%. (5) Through multivariable analysis, we determined that age is the most significant clinical variable in terms of the risk of AF recurrence.
Left atrial structure and risk of AF recurrence
The concept of LV mechanical dispersion assumes that tissue alterations and as a consequence different conduction times can be measured with the timing of the peak strain values, and that increases in the standard deviation of LV mechanical dispersion correlate with the presence of arrhythmias [10]. Further underlining the additional value of measuring SD-TPS in the LA is the previous finding that intra-atrial dyssynchrony during sinus rhythm is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence following catheter ablation [11]. In our study, in patients both without and with recurrence of AF, mean LAVI was not above the threshold of 34 mL/m2, which is often related to diastolic dysfunction, while further increased LA volumes of the LA have long been known to facilitate new episodes of AF and recurrence following a therapeutic intervention [6, 7, 15]. Despite the finding of normal mean LAVIs in the study population, SD-TPS values were higher in patients with AF recurrence in the first year following catheter ablation, suggesting changes of the atrial tissue resulting in a conduction delay which might be a characteristic of developing or present atrial cardiomyopathy [20]. A previous study demonstrated as well that SD-TPS is a marker for recurrence of AF following catheter ablation [21]. However, this study only included patients with PAF, and catheter ablation was performed with radiofrequency ablation in all patients [21]; thus, the presented study more accurately represents a real-world population presenting for catheter ablation [1]. The calculated cut-off value for SD-TPS of 38.6 ms is close to the previously published mean SD-TPS of 38 ms in patients with AF recurrence [21]; however, the cut-off originating from our cohort is data-driven and thus cannot be recommended for general use. The results show that even in a cohort including PAF and PersAF with normal LAVI SD-TPS can be applied to detect changes of the atrial tissue facilitating AF recurrence in terms of prolongation of the SD-TPS [12, 21].
Imaging variables and recurrence of AF following PVI
In the study, additional imaging variables were assessed as well, including LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), which was reported to be associated with the presence of AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke [22]. However, despite different mean values in the group of patients with and without AF recurrence, LV-GLS was not associated with the risk of AF recurrence in the multivariable analysis. Regarding the LV-GLS with the suggested cut-off from our analysis of − 22.2%, this value is more negative than the suggested − 20% for a healthy individual, which might not reflect the comorbidities of most of the patients [16, 22]. This might add to the finding that functions of the LV and LA have a close relation with influence of the hemodynamic status of the LV on the LA, thus facilitating AF recurrence. The suggested LA ejection fraction is a parameter which is calculated according to the formula as equivalent to the LV ejection fraction [16] and is termed total emptying fraction [23], reflecting the global function of the LA with a reservoir, conduit, and booster pump, and thus might be an indicator of a poor outcome in AF patients. Our study calculated LA ejection fraction with a cut-off of 35.7% lower than the suggested threshold in the literature; however, this might be due to a diversity of the study cohorts; the values were derived from [15]. Left atrial ejection fraction showed a different distribution between patients with and without AF recurrence and lower values in patients with AF recurrence, indicating a reduced total emptying fraction in this group of patients which might as well indicate a decreased function of the LA. However, in multivariable analysis, only SD-TPS was identified as the imaging variable associated with AF recurrence.
Clinical variables and recurrence of AF following catheter ablation
The variables with the highest predictive value regarding the development of AF are age and sex [1, 2], which have been well studied in different projects researching recurrence of AF following catheter ablation [13]. It is furthermore well established that the type of AF (paroxysmal vs. persistent), reflecting alterations of the atrial myocardial tissue, affects AF recurrence [13, 20].
Appraisal of the combined approach of combining imaging and clinical variables
The major benefit of combining imaging variables and clinical variables to predict risk of AF recurrence following treatment with catheter ablation is the high availability of data, as echocardiographic parameters are guideline-recommended with class I according to the current guidelines in AF patients [1]. The clinical variables age, sex, and type of AF are routinely collected and available in all patients. Additional suggestions like the inclusion of biomarkers in these models might as well refine the risk assessment of AF recurrence but demand additional resources of the health care system and might thus not be as broadly available [13]. In the multivariable analysis including the clinical variables and SD-TPS, only age remained a predictor of AF recurrence. However, as age is a non-influenceable factor in the treatment of AF, SD-TPS might be a novel diagnostic tool to facilitate treatment decision in AF patients.
Although in current guidelines and in literature LAVI is the preferred imaging variable used for risk stratification regarding development of AF and for treatment decisions, our study demonstrates that consideration of additional imaging variables like atrial mechanical dispersion parameters might be worthwhile in an integrated approach including clinical variables to assess the risk of AF recurrence following catheter ablation.
Defining variables that are reliable for identifying patients at high risk of developing AF following catheter ablation might have implications for increasing screening for AF recurrence [24].
Strengths and limitations
The major strength of the presented study is that it reflects a real-world cohort of AF patients presenting for the first PVI using state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods with both radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation. This sets it apart from previous studies as it encompasses patients with both paroxysmal and persisting AF who were candidates for catheter ablation. Additionally, the echocardiographic assessments were conducted by experienced physicians in a large tertiary center. However, it is important to note that the study’s limitations include its single-center nature and small sample size, which necessitates validation of the data-driven results in larger study cohorts. Furthermore, the assessment of SD-TPS requires expertise in interpretation, which may limit its use in general settings.
Conclusion
The study provides valuable real-world insights into the relationship between novel imaging parameters measuring atrial mechanical dispersion, along with clinical variables, and the risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation. However, as the data is hypothesis generating, additional validation and iteration in larger cohorts is needed.
References
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C et al (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 42(5):373–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM, Gianfagna F, Blankenberg S, Njolstad I et al (2017) Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the BiomarCaRE Consortium (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe). Circulation 136(17):1588–1597. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028981
Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, Brandes A, Eckardt L, Elvan A et al (2020) Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 383(14):1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2019422
Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S et al (2021) Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 384(4):316–324. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029554
Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J et al (2021) Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 384(4):305–315. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029980
Kawczynski MJ, Gilbers M, Van De Walle S, Schalla S, Crijns HJ, Maessen JG et al (2021) Role of pre-operative transthoracic echocardiography in predicting post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Europace 23(11):1731–1743. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab095
Njoku A, Kannabhiran M, Arora R, Reddy P, Gopinathannair R, Lakkireddy D et al (2018) Left atrial volume predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation: a meta-analysis. Europace 20(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux013
Pathan F, Sivaraj E, Negishi K, Rafiudeen R, Pathan S, D’Elia N et al (2018) Use of atrial strain to predict atrial fibrillation after cerebral ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(11):1557–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.07.027
Modin D, Biering-Sorensen SR, Mogelvang R, Alhakak AS, Jensen JS, Biering-Sorensen T (2018) Prognostic value of left atrial strain in predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey181
Trivedi SJ, Campbell T, Stefani LD, Thomas L, Kumar S (2021) Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography correlates with electroanatomic scar location and burden in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 22(8):855–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab021
Ciuffo L, Tao S, Gucuk Ipek E, Zghaib T, Balouch M, Lima JAC et al (2019) Intra-atrial dyssynchrony during sinus rhythm predicts recurrence after the first catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(2):310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.028
Kawakami H, Ramkumar S, Nolan M, Wright L, Yang H, Negishi K et al (2019) Left atrial mechanical dispersion assessed by strain echocardiography as an independent predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(10):1268–76 e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.06.002
Dretzke J, Chuchu N, Agarwal R, Herd C, Chua W, Fabritz L et al (2020) Predicting recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a systematic review of prognostic models. Europace 22(5):748–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa041
Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, Schreiber D, Luker J, Servatius H et al (2015) Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation: the CHASE-AF Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(24):2743–2752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.088
Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, Donal E, Badano LP (2019) Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 73(15):1961–1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev014
Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D, Abraham TP, Aurigemma G, Edvardsen T et al (2018) Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19(6):591–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey042
Bender R, Lange S (2001) Adjusting for multiple testing–when and how? J Clin Epidemiol 54(4):343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00314-0
Dardis C. Package ‘survMisc’. 0.5.6 ed2018. p. A collection of functions to help in the analysis of right-censored survival data. These extend the methods available in package: surviva.
Fabritz L, Crijns H, Guasch E, Goette A, Hausler KG, Kotecha D et al (2021) Dynamic risk assessment to improve quality of care in patients with atrial fibrillation: the 7th AFNET/EHRA Consensus Conference. Europace 23(3):329–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa279
Sarvari SI, Haugaa KH, Stokke TM, Ansari HZ, Leren IS, Hegbom F et al (2016) Strain echocardiographic assessment of left atrial function predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(6):660–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev185
Kawakami H, Ramkumar S, Pathan F, Wright L, Marwick TH (2020) Use of echocardiography to stratify the risk of atrial fibrillation: comparison of left atrial and ventricular strain. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21(4):399–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez240
Thomas L, Muraru D, Popescu BA, Sitges M, Rosca M, Pedrizzetti G et al (2020) Evaluation of left atrial size and function: relevance for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 33(8):934–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.021
Mairesse GH, Moran P, Van Gelder IC, Elsner C, Rosenqvist M, Mant J et al (2017) Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace 19(10):1589–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux177
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S. B. reports grants and personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Bayer, Siemens, and Thermo Fisher; grants from Singulex; and personal fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Medtronic, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens Diagnostics, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. P. K. was partially supported by the European Union AFFECT-AF (grant agreement 847770), MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286), British Heart Foundation (PG/17/30/32961; PG/20/22/35093; AA/18/2/34218), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ki 509167694), and Leducq Foundation; receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from the European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation, and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last 3 years; is listed as inventor on two issued patents held by University of Hamburg (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). All other authors did not declare a conflict of interest.
Additional information
What’s new?
• Transthoracic echocardiography allows assessment of the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in treatment-naïve patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF.
• Atrial mechanical dispersion (SD-TPS) showed a strong association with AF recurrence after a follow-up of 1 year following catheter ablation.
• Additional variables besides left atrial volume indexed to body surface area (BSA) (LAVI) should be assessed prior to catheter ablation to assess the risk of AF recurrence.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Knappe, D., Vogler, J., Weimann, J. et al. Association of atrial mechanical dispersion with atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation: results of the ASTRA-AF pilot study. Clin Res Cardiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02435-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02435-0