Abstract
Metasurfaces suitable for the terahertz gap are alternatives to naturally occurring materials and could accelerate the development of terahertz flat optics integrated with terahertz continuous-wave sources. However, metasurfaces have yet to be commonly adopted in terahertz devices that require a number of specific material properties because of the many choices in meta-atom design. In this paper, we demonstrate that simple dimension control of a single kind of meta-atom enables the design of a wide range of refractive indices from large positive to negative values in the 0.3-THz band. Measurements by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy verify three kinds of metasurfaces with (1) an extremely high refractive index of 12.3 + j0.88 and reflectance of 5.1% at 0.31 THz, (2) a zero refractive index of − 0.44 + j0.12 and reflectance of 2.6% at 0.34 THz, and (3) a negative refractive index of − 5.4 + j0.32 and reflectance of 22.7% at 0.31 THz. The 0.3-THz band is a frequency band for candidates to 6G wireless communications. Our results offer an accessible material platform for terahertz flat optics such as metalenses, antennas, and phase plates. Terahertz flat optics based on our presented metasurfaces would be a welcome contribution to the development of terahertz industries, including 6G wireless communications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Manipulating terahertz waves is a key to developing emerging terahertz industrial applications such as 6G wireless communications [1,2,3,4], imaging [5,6,7], and security [8]. Devices in terahertz industrial applications could contain continuous-wave (CW) sources radiating terahertz waves. Terahertz CW sources have developed rapidly to include resonant tunneling diodes (RTD) [9], quantum cascade lasers (QCL) [10], and Gunn diodes [11], to fulfill the commonly called terahertz gap. Terahertz waves radiated from terahertz CW sources pass through optical components to produce wavefronts including collimating [12, 13], focusing [14,15,16], circularly polarized waves [17], and optical vortices [18,19,20]. Many optical components manipulating terahertz waves are frequently made of naturally occurring materials such as cyclo-olefin polymer (COP) with a refractive index of 1.54 [21], magnesium oxide (MgO) 3.1 [22], and silicon (Si) 3.4 [23] in the terahertz waveband. However, three-dimensional bulky optical components made of naturally occurring materials are designed based on materials offering limited choices of refractive indices. Further, naturally occurring materials in the terahertz waveband commonly have the relative permeability fixed at 1.0 and are subject to high Fresnel reflections.
Metasurfaces enable the design of a wide range of refractive indices due to the simultaneous control of both relative permittivity and relative permeability. Flat optics based on metasurfaces makes it possible to replace frequently used three-dimensional bulky optical components with two-dimensional planar optical components [24,25,26,27,28]. The design of refractive indices, distribution, and polarization properties of the metasurfaces enables the development of two-dimensional planar optical components such as collimating [29, 30], focusing [31,32,33], optical vortices [34], polarization conversion [35, 36], beam steering [37], and beam splitter [38, 39]. Our previous work in [29] has experimentally demonstrated a gradient-refractive-index collimating metalens made with our original metasurface with an extremely high refractive index and low reflectance [40]. The two-dimensional planar collimating metalens has a sharp gradient of refractive indices distributed from the center to the periphery. The collimating metalens converts terahertz waves radiated from an RTD to plane waves with high directivity. Further, a metalens is mounted on an RTD with the short focal distance of 1 mm (1 λ) [30]. Simulations have verified a focusing metalens [33] made with a negative refractive index [41]. Metasurfaces with high [40, 42,43,44,45,46]; zero [47, 48]; and negative refractive indices [41, 49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] have been reported with different meta-atoms, frequency bands, and fabrication methods all helping to accelerate the development of terahertz flat optics [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Metasurfaces with a wide range of refractive indices consisting of rectangular meta-atoms at the same frequency would be a welcome contribution to enable an accessible platform for terahertz flat optics.
This paper aims to develop materials with on-demand optical constants to accelerate the growth of terahertz industrial applications. In this paper, we show that rectangular meta-atoms with different dimensions make it possible to design low-reflection metasurfaces with an extremely high refractive index above 10, a zero refractive index, and a negative index below 0 [57]. The material properties are produced by the control of the relative permeability as well as the permittivity. This is in contrast to the permeability of naturally occurring materials which cannot commonly be controlled in the terahertz waveband. The metasurfaces consist of cut metal wires symmetrically aligned on the front and back of a dielectric substrate. The operating frequency is the 0.3-THz band, a candidate frequency band for 6G wireless communications. Measurements by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) verify the three kinds of metasurfaces with an extremely high refractive index of 12.3 + j0.88 and low reflectance of 5.1% at 0.31 THz, a zero refractive index of − 0.44 + j0.12 and low reflectance of 2.6% at 0.34 THz, and a negative refractive index of − 5.4 + j0.32 and low reflectance of 22.7% at 0.31 THz. These metasurfaces with a wide range of refractive indices would provide an accessible platform for terahertz flat optics. Terahertz flat optics based on the metasurfaces would offer attractive components such as high numerical aperture metalenses, high directivity antennas, and optical vortex phase plates.
2 Metasurfaces with an extremely wide range of refractive indices in the 0.3-THz band
Figure 1(a)–(c) illustrate metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices at 0.3-THz, respectively. Figure 1(d) shows an enlarged view of the metasurface with an extremely high refractive index. The metasurfaces consist of symmetrically aligned paired cut metal wires on the front and back of a dielectric substrate. The meta-atoms of the cut metal wires allow more design freedom than those of the square metal patches [58]. The length of the cut metal wires, the gap along the y-axis, the thickness of the dielectric substrate, the distance between the cut metal wires along the x-axis, the width of the cut metal wires, and the thickness of the cut metal wires are g, l, d, s, w, and t, respectively. The meta-atoms of the cut metal wires have the six parameters of g, l, d, s, w, and t. The meta-atoms of the square metal patches have the four parameters of l, d, s, and t. The design freedom of the cut metal wires would offer a wide range of refractive indices, maintaining low reflectance.
The double-sided cut metal wires on the front and back of a dielectric substrate control the relative permittivity εr and permeability µr of the metasurfaces. The refractive index and relative impedance of the metasurfaces are expressed as \(n=\sqrt{{\epsilon }_{\text{r}}{\mu }_{\text{r}}}\) and \({Z}_{r}=\sqrt{{\mu }_{\text{r}}/{\epsilon }_{\text{r}}}\), respectively. The metasurface with an extremely high refractive index and low reflectance in Fig. 1(a) has the relative permittivity εr and permeability µr with high values. The metasurface with a zero refractive index and low reflectance in Fig. 1 (b) has the relative permittivity εr and permeability µr with zero values. The metasurface with a negative refractive index and low reflectance in Fig. 1(c) has the relative permittivity εr and permeability µr with negative values. The simultaneous control of the relative permittivity and permeability with high, zero, and negative values at the same frequency make it possible to design extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices, respectively. The control of the relative permittivity εr and permeability µr with similar values at the same frequency can also produce low reflection characteristics because the Fresnel reflections is reduced due to impedance matching as in circuit theory.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 give an overview of the reported high, zero, and negative refractive index metasurfaces, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only work that has demonstrated, by measurements, that simple dimensional control of a single kind of meta-atoms enables the design of a wide range of refractive indices from extremely high to negative values in the 0.3-THz band.
3 Design of the metasurfaces
Figure 2(a) and (b) illustrate equivalent circuits that explain the operating principle of the metasurfaces. Equivalent circuit theory approximately explains the dielectric and magnetic properties of the metasurfaces. The control of the length l and the gap g of the cut metal wires determines the dielectric and magnetic properties. The dielectric property arises from the electric field of the incident terahertz waves. The electric field of the incident terahertz waves generates currents on the cut metal wires of the front and back of the dielectric substrate in the same direction, resulting in the formation of serial resonance circuits. The resonance frequency of the dielectric property is determined by the inductance components LE of the cut metal wires and the capacitance components CE of the gaps between the cut metal wires along the y-axis. The magnetic property arises from the magnetic field of the incident terahertz waves. The magnetic field of the incident terahertz waves generates a current on the cut metal wires of the front and back of the dielectric substrate in the opposite direction, resulting in parallel resonance circuits. The resonance frequency of the magnetic property is determined by the inductance components LH of the cut metal wires and the capacitance components CH of the gaps between cut metal wires on the front and back of the dielectric substrate.
Figures 3, 4, and 5 show contour maps of the real part of the refractive indices, reflectance, transmittance relative permittivity, relative permeability, and relative impedance for the metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices, respectively. Table 4 shows the parameters g, l, d, s, w, and t of the fabricated metasurfaces with (a) extremely high, (b) zero, and (c) negative refractive indices, respectively. The contour maps in Figs. 3, 4, and 5 show the optical constants with varying gaps g between the cut metal wires along the y-axis from 50 to 150 μm and lengths l from 250 to 350 μm, respectively. The other parameters of distance s between the cut metal wires along the x-axis, width w of the cut metal wires along the x-axis, and the thickness t of the cut metal wires are fixed in Table 4. When the length l of the cut metal wire is changed, the adjacent cut metal wires are moved along the + y or – y direction. The gap g is kept constant when changing the length l. The black dots in Figs. 3, 4, and 5 show the parameters of the fabricated metasurfaces described in Table 4. The optical constants of the metasurfaces are derived from scattering matrices S11 and S21 calculated by a finite element method simulator ANSYS HFSS [59]. The dielectric substrate is cyclo-olefin polymer (COP) with low loss properties and a refractive index of 1.53 + j0.001 [60] measured in the terahertz waveband. The metal of the cut metal wires is copper with a conductivity of 5.8 × 107 S/m. Copper can be used for metasurfaces [40, 41, 48, 57, 58] and antennas [29, 30] in the terahertz waveband. The complex conductivity of copper with the Drude model is 5.8 × 107 +2.7 × 106 S/m [46], and the real part of the conductivity is larger than the imaginary part.
Figure 3 shows the parameters of a metasurface with an extremely high refractive index neff of 12.2 + j1.5, a low reflectance of 70%, and transmittance of 65.1% for cut metal wires with l = 313 μm and g = 94 μm. The material property with a high refractive index of 12.2 is produced by the simultaneous control of the relative permittivity and relative permeability with high values. The relative permittivity εr and permeability µr are 13.0 − j1.5 and 10.8 + j4.1, respectively, at 0.31 THz. The relative impedance Zr is 0.91 + j0.22. Figure 4 shows the parameters of a metasurface with a near-zero refractive index neff of 0.43 + j0.009, low reflectance of 2.0%, and high transmittance of 97.4% for cut metal wires with l = 318 μm and g = 60 μm. The material property with a near-zero refractive index of 0.43 is produced by the simultaneous control of the relative permittivity and relative permeability from 0 to 1.0. The relative permittivity and permeability are 0.87 + j0.009 and 0.21 + j0.007, respectively, at 0.31 THz. The relative impedance Zr is 0.49 + j0.006. Figure 5 shows the parameters of a metasurface with a negative refractive index neff of − 4.6 + j0.16, reflectance of 53.7%, and transmittance of 37.6% for cut metal wires with of l = 307 μm and g = 136 μm. The material property with a negative refractive index of − 4.6 is produced by the simultaneous control of the relative permittivity and relative permeability below 0. The relative permittivity and permeability are − 12.9 − j0.10 and − 1.6 + j0.12, respectively, at 0.34 THz. The relative impedance Zr is 0.35 − j0.01.
4 Fabrication and measurement of the metasurfaces
Figure 6 (a) shows a photograph of a fabricated metasurface with an extremely high refractive index. Figures 6 (b)–(d) show microscope images of fabricated meta-atoms composing the metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices, respectively. The dimensions of the metasurfaces are 40 × 40 mm2. The metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices consist of 27,420, 5,349, and 5,088 pairs of double-sided cut metal wires. Cyclo-olefin polymer films coated with copper layers on the front and back are etched to fabricate the metasurfaces. The copper layers are coated without adhesive layers to reduce conductor losses in the metasurfaces.
Figure 7 (a) and (b) are photographs of the optical system for the measurements of transmittance and reflectance of the fabricated metasurfaces. Measurements by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) with TOPTICA Photonics TeraFlash verify the transmittance and reflectance of the fabricated metasurfaces and reference. The references of the transmittance and reflectance measurements are dry air and a silver mirror, respectively. The ratio of frequency characteristics of a metasurface to those of a reference in transmittance and reflectance measurements derives scattering matrices and calculates optical constants of the metasurfaces such as refractive indices, relative permittivity, and permeability [59].
The main points of the measurement procedure are as follows. Pulsed terahertz waves are focused at the metasurfaces and silver mirror in transmittance and reflectance measurements. The calculated spot diameter and focal depth in the transmittance measurements are 3.5 and 19.6 mm, respectively. The calculated spot diameter and focal depth in the reflectance measurements are 7.1 and 78.5 mm. The optical lengths from the transmitted to the received photoconductive antennas are 419 and 698 mm in the transmittance and reflectance measurements, respectively. The fabricated metasurfaces are often deflected during the fabrication process. The deflection causes a difference in the position of the metasurfaces and the reference mirror in the reflectance measurements. The differences in optical lengths result in experimental errors. The metasurfaces have to be put in the same position as the reference mirror in the reflectance measurements to obtain accurate optical constants. The measured phases of the reflectance are compensated on the condition that the frequency characteristics of the measured phases are the same as those of the simulated phases. The compensation predicts that the metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices are concave with depths of 30, 7.5, and 45 μm along the incident terahertz waves, respectively.
Figure 8 (a)–(e), 9 (a)–(e), and 10 (a)–(e) show measurements of the material properties of the metasurfaces with an extremely high refractive index, a zero refractive index, and a negative refractive index, respectively. The dots and solid lines in Figs. 8, 9, and 10 show measurements and simulations, respectively. Figure 8 (a)–(c) show that measurements verify that the fabricated metasurface with an extremely high refractive index has a refractive index of 12.3 + j0.88, low reflectance of 5.1%, and high transmittance of 73.1% at 0.31 THz. The relative permittivity, permeability, and impedance are 15.5 − j1.4, 9.6 + j2.3, and 0.79 + j0.13, respectively, at 0.31 THz. Figure 9 (a)–(c) show that the measurements verify that a fabricated metasurface with a zero refractive index has a refractive index of − 0.44 + j0.12, low reflectance of 2.6%, and high transmittance of 94.6% at 0.34 THz. The relative permittivity, permeability, and impedance are − 0.19 + j0.12, − 0.93 − j0.05, and 1.9 − j0.63, respectively, at 0.34 THz. Figure 10 (a)–(c) show that measurements verify that a fabricated metasurface with a negative refractive index has a refractive index of − 5.4 + j0.32, low reflectance of 22.7%, and high transmittance of 56.4% at 0.31 THz. The relative permittivity, permeability, and impedance are − 9.7 − j2.9, − 2.6 + j1.1, and 0.5 − j0.18, respectively, at 0.31 THz.
5 Discussion of the metasurfaces
Figures 11, 12, and 13 show the measured dielectric energy loss, magnetic energy loss, and the sum of the dielectric energy and magnetic energy losses in the metasurfaces with extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices, respectively. The energy loss in the metasurfaces is derived by the following equation [61].
Here ω is the angular frequency, E is the electric field, and ε0 is the permittivity in vacuum. The terms of the dielectric energy and magnetic energy losses are \(\left|{\mu }_{\text{r}}\right|\text{Im}\left({\epsilon }_{\text{r}}\right)\) and \(\left|{\epsilon }_{\text{r}}\right|\text{Im}\left({\mu }_{\text{r}}\right)\), respectively. The energy is absorbed in the metasurfaces when the sum of the dielectric energy and magnetic energy losses is positive also when the dielectric energy loss or magnetic energy loss is negative. Figures 11, 12, and 13 show that the measurements are very similar to the simulations, while the sum of the dielectric energy loss and magnetic energy loss is negative at a few frequencies. The regions highlighted with gray in Figs. 11, 12, and 13 show the frequency bands where the conservation of energy in the measurements is not satisfied due to measurement errors. The sum of the dielectric energy and magnetic energy losses calculated from the simulations are always positive from 0.25 to 0.35 THz. The simulations show that the energy is not amplified in the metasurfaces. The errors between the measurements and simulations would be caused by experimental errors.
6 Conclusions
Metasurfaces consisting of double-sided paired cut metal wires make it possible to design a wide range of refractive indices including high, zero, and negative refractive indices. The simultaneous control of the relative permittivity and relative permeability with high, zero, and negative values at the same frequencies allow the design of extremely high, zero, and negative refractive indices. The control of the relative permittivity and permittivity with similar values reduces the Fresnel reflections. Measurements by THz-TDS verified the metasurfaces with an extremely high refractive index of 12.3 and low reflectance of 5.1%; a zero refractive index of − 0.44 and low reflectance of 2.6%; and a negative index of 5.4 and reflectance of 22.7% in the 0.3-THz band. The measurements presented here show that the parameter design of the cut metal wires enables a wide range of refractive indices: extremely high, zero, and negative. The metasurfaces enabling a wide range of refractive indices consisting of meta-atoms with the same structures may be applied to material platforms for terahertz flat optics, such as collimating lenses, focusing lenses, and refractive plates. The proposed metasurfaces would be a welcome contribution in the development of terahertz industries such as 6G wireless communications.
Data availability
Data is available upon reasonable request.
References
H.-J. Song, N. Lee, Terahertz communications: challenges in the next decade. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 12(2), 105–117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2021.3128677
H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A.F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sjoland, F. Tufvesson, 6G wireless systems: vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities, Proc. IEEE 109(7), 1166–1199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3061701
S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, M.-S. Alouini, What should 6G be? Nat. Electron. 3, 20–29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0355-6
I.F. Akyildiz, A. Kak, S. Nie, 6G and Beyond: the future of wireless communications systems. IEEE Access. 8, 13395–134030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010896
P. Hillger, J. Grzyb, R. Jain, U.R. Pfeiffer, Terahertz imaging and sensing applications with silicon-based technologies. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 9(1), 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2018.2884852
H. Guerboukha, K. Nallappan, M. Skorobogatiy, Toward real-time terahertz imaging. Adv. Opt. Photon 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.10.000843
D.M. Mittleman, Twenty years of terahertz imaging [Invited]. Opt. Express. 26(8), 9417–9431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.009417
J. Ma, R. Shrestha, J. Adelberg, C.-Y. Yeh, Z. Hossain, E. Knightly, J.M. Jornet, D.M. Mittleman, Security and eavesdropping in terahertz wireless links. Nature. 563, 89–93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0609-x
A.A. -Khalidi, K.H. Alharbi, J. Wang, R. Morariu, L. Wang, A. Khalid, J.M.L. Figueiredo, E. Wasige, Resonant tunneling diode terahertz sources with up to 1 mw output power in the J-band. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 10(2), 150–157 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2019.2959210
K. Fujita, S. Hayashi, A. Ito, M. Hitaka, Dougakiuchi Sub-terahertz and terahertz generation in long-wavelength quantum cascade lasers. Nanophotonics. 8(12), 2235–2241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2019-0238
A.S. Hajo, O. Yilmazoglu, A. Dadger, F. Kuppers, T. Kusserow, Reliable GaN-based THz Gunn diodes with side-contact and field-plate technologies. IEEE Access. 8, 84116–84122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991309
M.A. -DelPino, N. Llombart, G. Chattopadhyay, C. Lee, C.J. -Kubiak, L. Jofre, I. Mehdi, Design guidelines for a terahertz silicon micro-lens antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 12, 84–87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2013.2240252
H.D. Hristov, J.M. Rodriguez, W. Grote, The grooved-dielectric Fresnel zone plate: an effective terahertz lens and antenna. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 54(6), 1343–1348 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.26812
L.P. Kamburov, J.M. Rodriguez, J.R. Urumov, H.D. Hristov, Millimeter-wave conical fresnel zone lens of flat dielectric rings. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62(4), 2140–2148 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2014.2303165
F. Formaneka, M.-A. Brun, T. Umetsu, S. Omori, A. Yasuda, Aspheric silicon lenses for terahertz photoconductive antennas. Appl. Phys. Express. 94, 02113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3072357
M. Wichmann, A.S. Mondol, N. Kocic, S. Lippert, T. Probst, M. Schwerdtfeger, S. Schumann, T. Hochrein, P. Heidemeyer, M. Bastian, G. Bastian, M. Koch, Terahertz plastic compound lenses. Appl. Opt. 52(18), 4186–4191 (2013). https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-52-18-4186
G.-B. Wu, Y.-S. Zeng, K.F. Chan, S.-W. Qu, C.H. Chan, 3-D printed circularly polarized modified Fresnel lens operating at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 67(7), 4429–4437 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2019.2908110
K. Miyamoto, K. Suizu, T. Akiba, T. Omatsu, Direct observation of the topological charge of a terahertz vortex beam generated by a Tsurupica spiral phase plate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(26), 261104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4886407
Y. Yang, X. Ye, L. Niu, K. Wang, Z. Yang, J. Liu, Generating terahertz perfect optical vortex beams by diffractive elements. Opt. Express. 28(2), 1417–1425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.380076
F. Machado, P. Zagrajek, V. Ferrando, J.A. Monsoriu, W.D. Furlan, Multiplexing THz vortex beams with a single diffractive 3-D printed lens. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 9(1), 63–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2018.2883831
T. Kaji, Y. Tominari, T. Yamada, S. Saito, I. Morohashi, A. Otomo, Terahertz-wave generation devices using electro-optic polymer slab waveguides and cyclo-olefin polymer clads. Opt. Express. 26(23), 30466–30475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.030466
D. Grischkowsky, S. Keiding, THz time-domain spectroscopy of high tc substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 57(10), 1055–1057 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.104280
D. Grischkowsky, S. Keiding, M. van Exter, C. Fattinger, Far-infrared time-domain spectroscopy with terahertz beams of dielectrics and semiconductors. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7(10), 2006–2015 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.7.002006
W.T. Chen, A.Y. Zhu, F. Capasso, Flat optics with dispersion-engineered metasurfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5(8), 604–620 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0203-3
N. Yu, F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 13, 139–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3839
D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, M.L. Brongersma, Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science. 345(6194), 298–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253213
A.V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V.M. Shalaev, Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science. 339(6125), 1232009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232009
N. Yu, P. Genevet, M.A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, Z. Gaburro, Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science. 334(6054), 333–337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210713
T. Suzuki, K. Endo, J. Kim, K. Tsuruda, M. Sekiya, Metalens mounted on a resonant tunneling diode for collimated and directed terahertz waves. Opt. Express. 29(12), 18988–19000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.427135
K. Endo, M. Sekiya, J. Kim, K. Sato, T. Suzuki, Resonant tunneling diode integrated with metalens for high-directivity terahertz waves. Appl. Phys. Express. 14(8), 082001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.35848/1882-0786/ac0678
J. Neu, B. Krolla, O. Paul, B. Reinhard, R. Beigang, M. Rahm, Metamaterial-based gradient index lens with strong focusing in the THz frequency range. Opt. Express. 18(26), 27748–27757 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.027748
X. Jiang, H. Chen, Z. Li, H. Yuan, L. Cao, Z. Luo, K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Wen, L.-. Zhu, X. Zhou, G. Liang, D. Ruan, L. Du, L. Wang, G. Chen, All-dielectric metalens for terahertz wave imaging. Opt. Express. 26(11), 14132–14142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.014132
H. Nakao, S. Kondoh, T. Suzuki, Terahertz focusing metalens of reflectionless meta-atoms with negative refractive indices. Appl. Opt. 60, 3989–3996 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.420836
H. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Xu, C. Tian, Q. Wang, Y. Xu, Y. Li, J. Gu, Z. Tian, C. Ouyang, X. Zhang, C. Hu, J. Han, W. Zhang, High-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for polarization-dependent terahertz wavefront manipulation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(1), 170073 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201700773
C.-C. Chang, D. Headland, D. Abbott, W. Withayachumnankul, H.-T. Chen, Demonstration of a highly efficient terahertz flat lens employing tri-layer metasurfaces. Opt. Lett. 42(9), 1867–1870 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.001867
M.R. Tavakol, B. Rahmani, A. Khavasi, Terahertz quarter wave-plate metasurface polarizer based on arrays of graphene ribbons. IEEE Photon Technol. Lett. 31(12), 931–934 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2019.2913503
J. Neu, R. Beigang, M. Rahm, Metamaterial-based gradient index beam steerers for terahertz radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(4), 041109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816345
H. Zeng, Y. Zhang, F. Lan, S. Liang, L. Wang, T. Song, T. Zhang, Z. Shi, Z. Yang, X. Kang, X. Zhang, P. Mazumder, D.M. Mittleman, Terahertz dual-polarization beam splitter via an anisotropic matrix metasurface. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 9(5), 491–497 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2019.2927890
B. Lv, C. Ouyang, H. Zhang, Q. Xu, Y. Li, X. Zhang, Z. Tian, J. Gu, L. Liu, J. Han, W. Zhang, All-dielectric metasurface-based quad-beam splitter in the terahertz regime. IEEE Photon J. 12(5), 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2020.3029057
K. Ishihara, T. Suzuki, Metamaterial demonstrates both a high refractive index and extremely low reflection in the 0.3-THz band. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves. 38, 1130–1139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-017-0416-8
T. Suzuki, M. Sekiya, T. Sato, Y. Takebayashi, Negative refractive index metamaterial with high transmission, low reflection, and low loss in the terahertz waveband. Opt. Express. 26(7), 8314–8324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.008314
M. Choi, S.H. Lee, Y. Kim, S.B. Kang, J. Shin, M.H. Kwak, K.-Y. Kang, Y.-H. Lee, N. Park, B. Min, A terahertz metasurfaces with unnaturally high refractive index. Nature. 470, 369–373 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09776
H.T. Yudistira, A.P. Tenggara, V.D. Nguyen, T.T. Kim, F.D. Prasetyo, C.-G. Choi, M. Choi, D. Byun, Fabrication of terahertz metamaterial with high refractive index using high-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(21), 211106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4832197
S. Tan, F. Yan, L. Singh, W. Cao, N. Xu, X. Hu, R. Singh, M. Wang, W. Zhang, Terahertz metasurfaces with a high refractive index enhanced by the strong nearest neighbor coupling. Opt. Express. 23(22), 29222–29230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.029222
L. Singh, R. Singh, W. Zhang, Ultra-high terahertz index in deep subwavelength coupled bi-layer free-standing flexible metamaterials. J. Appl. Phys. 121(23), 233103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985277
H. Asada, K. Endo, T. Suzuki, Reflectionless metasurface with high refractive index in the terahertz waveband. Opt. Express. 29(10), 14513–14524 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.420827
Q.-L. Zhang, L.-M. Si, Y. Huang, X. Lv, W. Zhu, Low-index-metamaterial for gain enhancement of planar terahertz antenna. AIP Adv. 4(037103) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868384
T. Suzuki, H. Asada, Reflectionless zero refractive index metasurface in the terahertz waveband. Opt. Express. 28(15), 21509–21521 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.395223
M. Awad, M. Nagel, H. Kurz, Negative-index metamaterial with polymer-embedded wire-pair structures at terahertz frequencies. Opt. Lett. 33(22), 2683–2685 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.002683
O. Paul, C. Imhof, B. Reinhard, R. Zengerle, R. Beigang, Negative index bulk metamaterial at terahertz frequencies. Opt. Express. 16(9), 6736–6744 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.006736
P. Weis, O. Paul, C. Imhof, R. Beigang, M. Rahm, Strongly birefringent metamaterials as negative index terahertz wave plates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(17), 171104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3253414
T.F. Gundogdu, N. Katsarakis, M. Kafesaki, R.S. Penciu, G. Konstantinidis, A. Kostopoulos, E.N. Economou, C.M. Soukoulis, Negative index short-slab pair and continuous wires metamaterials in the far infrared regime. Opt. Express. 16(12), 9173–9180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.009173
H.O. Moser, J.A. Kong, L.K. Jian, H.S. Chen, G. Liu, M. Bahou, S.M.P. Kalaiselvi, S.M. Maniam, X.X. Cheng, B.I. Wu, P.D. Gu, A. Chen, S.P. Heussler, S.B. Mahmood, L. Wen, Free-standing THz electromagnetic metamaterials. Opt. Express. 16(18), 13773–13780 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.013773
J. Gu, J. Han, X. Lu, R. Singh, Z. Tian, Q. Xing, W. Zhang, A close-ring pair terahertz metamaterial resonating at normal incidence. Opt. Express. 17(22), 20307–20312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.020307
K. Takano, Y. Yakiyama, K. Shibuya, K. Izumi, H. Miyazaki, Y. Jimba, F. Miyamaru, H. Kitahara, M. Hangyo, Fabrication and performance of TiO2-ceramic-based metamaterials for terahertz frequency range. IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol. 3(6), 812–819 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2285521
C.-L. Chang, W.-C. Wang, H.-R. Lin, F.J. Hsieh, Y.-B. Pun, C.-H. Chan, Tunable terahertz fishnet metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 151903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801648
K. Watai, K. Ishihara, S. Kondoh, T. Sato, M. Shijo, T. Suzuki, Terahertz Metamaterial to Demonstrate Extremely Wide Range of Effective Refractive Indices in the 0.3-THz Band, in IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (2017), paper TH–A5.1A.10
K. Sato, T. Suzuki, Polarization-independent isotropic metasurface with high refractive index, low reflectance, and high transmittance in the 0.3-THz band. Nanophotonics. 12(13), 2537–2544 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0788
X. Chen, T.M. Grzegorezyk, B.-I. Wu, J. Jr. Pacheco, J.A. Kong, Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials. Phys. Rev. E. 70, 016608 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.016608
Y. Kishi, M. Nagai, J.C. Young, K. Takano, M. Hangyo, T. Suzuki, Terahertz laminated-structure polarizer with high extinction ratio and transmission power. Appl. Phys. Express. 8(3), 032201–032201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.8.032201
Y. Minowa, T. Fujii, M. Nagai, T. Ochiai, K. Sakoda, K. Hirano, K. Tanaka, Evaluation of effective electric permittivity and magnetic permeability in metamaterial slabs by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Opt. Express. 16(7), 4785–4796 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.004785
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Kaito Ebisawa and Shunji Yamamori of Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology for the preparation of the photographs in Figs. 6(a)–(d).
Funding
This research is supported by FOREST from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (JPMJFR222I), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (No. 21H01839), and Research Foundation for the Electrotechnology of Chubu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KW, KI, RO, SK, TSa. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KS and KW, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The research work was supervised by TSu. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, K., Watai, K., Ishihara, K. et al. Terahertz metasurfaces to demonstrate an extremely wide range of refractive indices in the 0.3-THz band. Appl. Phys. A 130, 428 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-024-07589-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-024-07589-2