Abstract
Elevated temperatures cause mass coral bleaching, leading to reef degradation. The frequency of bleaching events is increasing, and severe bleaching events have been predicted to occur annually in the next few decades. However, the ability of corals to acclimate and adapt to these unprecedented stresses remains unknown. In this study, we investigated how three years of consecutive thermal stress affect the adult fragments of the coral Acropora tenuis. The fragments were exposed to temperature treatments of ~ 28 °C (control) and ~ 31 °C (heat stress) until they began to bleach. We measured the survival rate, maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of the symbiotic algae, and algal density of the fragments. The survival rate of the fragments under thermal stress decreased over the three-year period, reaching 20% by the end. Additionally, we observed a decrease in Fv/Fm and a reduction in algal density in the stressed fragments compared to those in the control fragments during all three years of the thermal stress period. These findings collectively suggested that consecutive bleaching-level thermal stress increases the susceptibility of corals to heat.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sea surface temperatures are rapidly and significantly increasing as a consequence of climate change (Hoegh-Guldberg and Bruno 2010; Hughes et al. 2017, 2018; IPCC 2023), posing a significant threat to ecosystems worldwide, particularly coral reefs (Berkelmans and Oliver 1999; Veron et al. 2009; Frieler et al. 2012; Hughes et al. 2018). Coral reef ecosystems are experiencing an unprecedented decline as a result of the prolonged increase in sea temperatures (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007; Eakin et al. 2009; Veron et al. 2009; Hoegh-Guldberg 2011; Hughes et al. 2018). Evidence suggests that one-third of all reef-building coral species may become endangered (Carpenter et al. 2008), potentially leading to the collapse of coral reef ecosystems (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007; 2017; Pratchett et al. 2021; Obura et al. 2022). The ability of coral holobionts to acclimatize or adapt plays a crucial role in the recovery of reefs following such events (Weis 2010; Logan et al. 2014; Van Oppen et al. 2015).
Dinoflagellates that form symbiotic associations with scleractinian corals can transfer up to 95% of their photosynthetic output to the coral hosts (Muscatine 1990). However, under unfavorable conditions such as high temperatures and solar irradiance, the symbiotic contribution is significantly reduced (Grottoli et al. 2004). Impairment of the symbionts’ photosynthetic function is one of the initial responses to environmental perturbations (Brown 1997; Warner et al. 1999), which disrupts the symbiotic relationships between corals and their algal symbionts (Fagoonee et al. 1999). This phenomenon is commonly known as “coral bleaching” (Fitt et al. 2001; Muller-Parker et al. 2015; Hughes et al. 2017, 2018). Thus, coral bleaching can result in mortality if the symbiotic function is not recovered or if the coral is deprived of its primary energy source for an extended period of time (Brown 1997). Mass coral bleaching and consequent mortality events such as unprecedented bleaching in terms of stress intensity, duration, and geographical extent occurred in the Caribbean in 2023 (Goreau and Hayes 2024) and have been predicted to occur across the Indo-Pacific in 2024, likely devastating a high percentage of corals (Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2023) and causing extensive damage to hundreds of kilometers of reefs over the period of three months of the bleaching onset, putting them at risk of extinction. However, the response of corals to environmental disturbances may vary among populations, individual colonies, and physiological traits (Schulte et al. 2011; Forsman 2015; Parkinson et al. 2015). Consequently, such disturbances have significant negative consequences for the health and survival of coral reefs worldwide (Loya et al. 2001).
While acclimatization, which involves physiological changes at the individual level, is an important process (Baird et al. 2009; Liew et al. 2020; Ziegler et al. 2014; Hackerott et al. 2021), it should be contrasted with adaptation, which includes genetic or evolutionary changes. Acclimatization can be considered a potential short-term strategy for corals to cope with changing environmental conditions (Coles and Brown 2003). Corals exhibit varying responses to bleaching stimuli depending on their resistance, resilience, and acclimatization levels. Acclimatization can contribute to improved heat tolerance (Palumbi et al. 2014). In other words, corals faced with thermal stress and subsequent bleaching show higher tolerance and resistance to bleaching in later thermal events (Maynard et al. 2008; Pratchett et al. 2013; McClanahan 2017; Singh et al. 2023), indicating their acclimatization.
Understanding acclimatization is crucial for predicting coral bleaching thresholds. Recurrent bleaching is becoming an increasingly severe problem worldwide (Hughes et al. 2018); however, our understanding of the effects of consecutive stress on individual coral colonies remains limited. By exposing the adults to consecutive years of thermal stress and studying their responses, we can gain insight into the resistance of coral species to extreme thermal conditions. It is essential to bridge this knowledge gap regarding the impact of climate change on the physiological conditions of adult corals, as annual severe bleaching of coral reefs is predicted to become widespread in the future (Bruno and Selig 2007; Hooidonk et al. 2013; Hughes et al. 2018).
In this study, we evaluated the impact of consecutive thermal stress on adult colonies of the coral species Acropora tenuis, commonly found in the Pacific region (Veron 2000; Hirose and Hidaka 2006). This species is known to be highly susceptible to bleaching in relation to other coral species (Obura 2001; Carpenter et al. 2008; van Woesik et al. 2011). The aim of this study was to determine whether A. tenuis could rapidly acclimatize to consecutive thermal stress over a three-year period imposed by climate change. Our findings and observations have important implications for reef regeneration and recovery from climate-related mortality events.
Materials and methods
Experiment design
In August 2018, six healthy A. tenuis colonies (branching morphology) were carefully collected from a depth of five to six meters in the northern region of Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan (26°39′N, 127°52′E). The colonies were safely transported to the Sesoko Marine Station, University of the Ryukyus. In 2016 and 2017, coral reefs around Okinawa experienced thermal anomalies (< 5.5 degree heating weeks, DHWs), and moderate bleaching was reported in some sites (Singh et al. 2019). Therefore, the colonies of the target species were collected from a site with low thermal anomalies (< 4 DHWs), no bleaching experience in 2016, and no thermal stress anomaly in 2017 (Singh et al. 2019). To prepare them for the experiment, each of the six healthy colonies was carefully divided into two fragments, one for the control condition and the other for the thermal stress condition, with a total of twelve fragments. These fragments were then placed in flow-through tanks and placed under experimental light conditions for a period of ten days to allow for proper acclimation to their new surroundings and facilitate wound healing prior to the start of the experiment. Following a ten-day acclimation period, the fragments were stored at two different temperatures: ~ 28 °C (control condition) and ~ 31 °C (thermal stress condition). Thermal stress was defined as a ~ 3 °C increase above the maximum monthly mean (MMM) temperature in the study site and ~ 2 °C increase above the coral bleaching threshold. The MMM value of the study site was 28.4 °C according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coral Reef Watch (CRW) 5-km satellite regional virtual station for the Northern Ryukyus Island (Liu et al. 2014, 2017). Three separate tanks were used for thermal stress treatment, and a heater was used to gradually increase the temperature from the ambient temperature of ~ 28 °C to the target temperature of ~ 31 °C over a three-day period, with an increase rate of 0.5 °C every 6 h. Throughout the experiment, temperature was recorded every 10 min using a temperature logger (HOBO Pro V2; Onset Computer Corporation, MA, USA). The fragments were maintained under 12 h of light (~ 200 μmol photons m−2S−1) and 12 h of darkness using LED lights (AI Hydra HD LED, Aqua Illumination, USA). The other three tanks were maintained at the ambient temperature of ~ 28 °C, serving as the control group for comparison (Fig. 1).
The thermal stress experiment was conducted over three consecutive years (in August 2018, 2019, and 2020) and can be classified as a moderate-duration heat stress experiment as defined by Grottolli et al. (2021). After the completion of the thermal stress experiment each year, all A. tenuis fragments were carefully transplanted back to the reef on underwater stainless-steel rectangular tables (0.5 m above the ground) and maintained until the next thermal stress (Fig. 1).
Prior to each year’s thermal stress, all fragments that were kept in the reef were transferred back to the flow-through tanks and subjected to experimental light condition for a period of ten days to allow for proper acclimation. During this period, the fragments that had previously been exposed to thermal stress were once again subjected to high temperatures of ~ 31 °C. In the first year, signs of bleaching were observed after 10 days of exposure to thermal stress. Similarly, in the second year, the experiment lasted for 9 days, and bleaching became evident during this timeframe. In the third year, the thermal stress experiment lasted for 13 days, and signs of bleaching were observed during this period. These varying durations were designed to capture the temporal dynamics of coral response to thermal stress. Over the two years of the experiment, the fragments did not face in situ thermal anomalies before and after transplant to the sea, and sea temperatures were lower than the threshold temperature for corals (Fig. 1).
Brightness (coral color measurements)
The coral’s response to heat stress was evaluated throughout the three-year experiment. During the thermal stress experiments conducted each year, all fragments in each treatment were photographed daily under identical illumination using a digital camera (Canon Powershot G10; Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with constant white balance settings. A Coral Health Chart (www. coralwatch.org) was employed as the color scale to assess the degree of health, paling, or bleaching, which served as a reliable indicator of changes in symbiont density and chlorophyll a and c2 contents. Photographs of the three parts of each fragment were analyzed using the histogram function with the RGB channel in Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.
The D hue, consisting of six distinct colored areas (D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, and D6), was utilized for the studied species. D1 (white) represented the bleached fragments, showing a value of 236, whereas D6 (brown) represented the unbleached state which color measurement per fragment, showing a value of 60. Further details regarding this parameter can be found in Siebeck et al. (2006).
Maximum quantum yield of photosystem II
Throughout the experiment, on a daily basis, the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of the symbiotic algae in each temperature treatment was measured at three specific locations: the upper third, middle, and lower third at a distance of 2−3 mm from the coral tissue of each fragment. A diving pulse amplitude-modulated (PAM) underwater fluorometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) was utilized for these measurements. The fragments were measured one hour after sunset following a period of 60 min in the dark-adapted state, which is a reliable indicator of the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Demmig and Björkman 1987). The measurements were repeated until signs of bleaching were detected, occurring at 10, 9, and 13 days in the first, second, and third year, respectively.
Symbiotic algal density and chlorophyll contents
Each year of the experiment, small branches were collected from each fragment before and after heat exposure to measure the density of symbiotic algae and chlorophyll contents following the protocol described by Nakamura et al. (2005). The collected fragments were then frozen at −80 °C until further analysis. To extract the coral tissue from each sample, an air-pik was used, and filtered seawater was added to a Ziploc bag, followed by homogenization. The resulting homogenate was washed three times by centrifugation (4500 × g for 20 min at 4 °C) and mixed using a vortex mixer (GeniaTM Vortex Mixer Model, Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY, USA). The extract solutions were divided into two aliquots. The initial slurry was used to count the number of symbiotic algae cells through five replicates of hemocytometer counts under a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 400 × magnification following a standard procedure. The paraffin wax dipping technique was employed to estimate the surface area of each branch (Veal et al. 2010). The second aliquot was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min to extract chlorophyll a and c2. The resulting pellet was mixed with 1 mL of 90% acetone and quantified after 24 h in the dark at 4 °C until the measurement. The absorbances of the extract solutions were measured at different path lengths (630, 664, and 750 nm), as described by Jeffrey and Humphrey (1975), and standardized based on the surface area of the branch.
Survivorship of the fragments
Each year of the experiment, the fragments were transferred to the reef after the thermal stress experiment, and their health status was visually monitored monthly and photographed using an underwater digital camera.
Statistical analysis
Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests (Quinn and Keough 2002) were used to investigate the normality and homogeneity assumptions of the variances prior to the statistical analysis, respectively. Linear mixed effect models (LMM) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc pairwise comparisons were used to assess the differences in photosynthetic efficiency and brightness between the treatments in each year’s thermal stress experiment using the ‘emmeans’ package in R (Lenth 2019). The temperature treatments and days were considered fixed effect factors, while the colony and tank were considered random effects. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare the alternative models (Tables S1), and the model with the lowest AIC value was selected for the statistical analysis. Symbiotic algal density and chlorophyll content (a + c2) of the fragments in the treatments were determined before and after stress each year using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Kaplan–Meier log-rank test was used to evaluate the differences in the survival of fragments between the treatments over the three years of the experiment. The significance level for the statistical analysis was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the R software.
Results
Brightness (coral color)
Compared to the control, the fragments subjected to thermal stress exhibited significantly higher average coral color scores after 10 days in the first year, 9 days in the second year, and 13 days in the third year (Table 1) (Fig. 2a). Among these fragments, the most significant variations in whiteness hue observed in 2019, 2020, and 2018 were 166.09 ± 9.29 SE (mean ± standard error), 143.68 ± 11.62 SE, and 142.69 ± 9.07 SE, respectively, at the end of each year’s thermal stress experiment (Fig. 2a, Tables 1, S2).
Maximum quantum yield of photosystem II
The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) differed significantly between the control and experimental groups during the study period. In the first year, over a 10-day period, the thermal stress fragments showed a decrease in Fv/Fm (LMM, p = 0.04, n = 6 for each treatment, Fig. 2b, Tables 1, S2). In the second year, the control fragments consistently outperformed the thermal stress fragments throughout the 9 days of the experiment (LMM, p = 0.1, n = 6 for the control treatment and n = 5 for the stress treatment, Fig. 2b, Tables 1, S2). Lastly, in the third year, we observed a noticeable reduction in Fv/Fm starting from day four of exposure to elevated temperatures (LMM, p = 0.02; n = 5 for the control treatment and n = 3 for the stress treatment, Fig. 2b, Tables 1, S2).
Symbiotic algal density and chlorophyll content
We measured the symbiotic algal density and chlorophyll (a + c2) content in all coral fragments over the course of three years. Exposure to the elevated temperature of ~ 31 °C resulted in a significant change in symbiotic algal density throughout the experimental period (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05; Fig. 3a, Table S3). In contrast, the effect of thermal stress on chlorophyll (a + c2) concentration per cell was significantly greater than that of the control treatment (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05, Fig. 3b, Table S3) at the end of the experiment in all three years.
Effects of thermal stress on coral survival
After conducting the initial thermal stress experiment in 2018, we found that 83.33% of the stressed fragments survived the subsequent year (2019). In 2020, the survival rate of stressed fragments decreased to 50%. Meanwhile, the control fragments exhibited a 100% survival rate in 2019, which decreased to 83.33% in the 2020 thermal stress experiments. The survivorship of fragments between the two treatments showed a significant difference over the course of three consecutive years of stress (Kaplan–Meier survival estimate, p < 0.001; Fig. 4).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the effects of consecutive thermal stress on the adult colonies (fragments) of Acropora tenuis for the first time. Our findings revealed that consecutive moderate-duration thermal stress can increase the susceptibility of adult A. tenuis fragments to heat stress. Previous studies conducted in various reef locations across the Indo-Pacific Ocean have indicated that branching coral species were among the first to bleach and die (Brown and Suharsono 1990; Hoegh-Guldberg and Salvat 1995; Sutthacheep et al. 2010). To date, the implications of three years of consecutive thermal stress on the predicted degradation of reefs have not been studied. The results of the present study clearly demonstrate that moderate-duration consecutive direct thermal stress leads to a decline in the survival rate of coral fragments.
Coral species display varying degrees of susceptibility to heat stress (Brandt 2009; Gintert et al. 2018; Marzonie et al. 2023; Tavakoli-Kolour et al. 2023). In the present study, fragments subjected to thermal stress treatment each year exhibited a decrease in photosynthetic efficiency and symbiotic algal density compared to those of the control fragments, and bleaching was observed in the stress treatment fragments. Additionally, in each year following heat stress exposure, mortality was observed in some fragments (Fig. 4, 5). The decline in photosynthetic efficiency and loss of algal symbionts represent the rapid responses to thermal stress exposure (Warner et al. 1999), which may increase the risk of mortality (Schoepf et al. 2015). However, the loss of algal symbionts due to heat stress is not necessarily the cause of coral mortality (Anthony et al. 2007). Instead, heat stress can reduce phototrophic carbon by destabilizing the carbon translocation process in algae (Anthony et al. 2007). Consequently, corals may face mortality even when bleaching is not visibly apparent in coral colonies due to the collapse in the nutrient cycling of symbiotic algae (Rädecker et al. 2021).
Thermal stress and consequent bleaching events can alter the ability of corals to survive other ecological disturbances, determining whether they emerge as “winners” or “losers” based on their susceptibility to increased heat stress (Loya et al. 2001; Grottoli et al. 2014). Corals can acclimate to heat stress over relatively short periods with rapid adjustments in their physiological responses (Palumbi et al. 2014). Interestingly, A. tenuis has been shown to use adaptation strategies in response to single bleaching events by producing heat-tolerant generations (Hazraty-Kari et al. 2022). Nevertheless, the results of this study suggested that the consequences of moderate-duration consecutive thermal stress negatively affected the survival of the adult fragments of A. tenuis, as previously observed in the juveniles of this species (Hazraty-Kari et al. 2023a; Hazraty-Kari et al. 2023b). Consecutive thermal stress can render certain species more vulnerable to bleaching, ultimately leading to a long-term decline in coral reefs (Grottoli et al. 2014).
The observed delay in coral colony bleaching in subsequent heat stress events may be related to the coral’s acclimatization ability (Pandolfi et al. 2011; Logan et al. 2014). Observations following natural bleaching incidents in the Pacific separated by several years suggested that certain branching species more susceptible to single bleaching events may have in some cases adapted (Guest et al. 2012; Maynard et al. 2008; Pratchett et al. 2013; Lachs et al. 2023). Despite the observed delay in coral bleaching in the third year compared to those in the first and second years, our findings indicated that the fragments did not acclimate to moderate-duration thermal stress after three years. Some coral species exhibit a significantly high acclimatization capacity, leading to a delay in consecutive bleaching events (Logan et al. 2014). The duration and intensity of heat stress events can result in distinct physiological and ecological reactions in corals (Fordyce et al. 2019; Evensen et al. 2023; Tavakoli-Kolour et al. 2023). Short-term and low-intensity heat pulses may induce acclimatory responses in subsequent heat stress events (Ainsworth et al. 2016; Singh et al. 2023). However, such coral species are more vulnerable to consecutive intense thermal stress (i.e., one that triggers noticeable bleaching) and do not show an acclimatization response or beneficial stress memory. Nevertheless, additional research is required to determine the performance and acclimatization potential of other species in the face of consecutive thermal stress, which will have implications for the future of reef ecosystems.
Conclusions and implications
Our findings unequivocally demonstrated that consecutive moderate-duration thermal stress negatively affects the adult individuals of the reef-building coral A. tenuis. This finding highlights the fact that three years of moderate-duration consecutive stress did not provide a beneficial stress memory in this species. However, shorter duration and small pulse of thermal stress may result in an acclimatory response in this species; therefore, further research is necessary to investigate the annual thermal stress experienced by various coral species over multiple years, with different thermal stress durations and severity. Such studies will aid in identifying which global reefs are at risk of long-term degradation on a worldwide scale. Additionally, studies should be carried out to determine the impact of thermal stress on coral physiology and resilience, as well as to determine the ability of different coral species to adapt to climate change. It is important to note that conducting such studies presents significant challenges.
References
Ainsworth TD, Heron SF, Ortiz JC, Mumby PJ, Grech A, Ogawa D, Eakin CM, Leggat W (2016) Climate change disables coral bleaching protection on the Great Barrier Reef. Science 352:338–342
Anthony KRN, Connolly SR, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2007) Bleaching, energetics, and coral mortality risk: effects of temperature, light, and sediment regime. Limnol Oceanogr 52:716–726. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0716
Baird AH, Guest JR, Willis BL (2009) Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:551–571. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120220
Berkelmans R, Oliver JK (1999) Large-scale bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 18:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380050154
Brandt ME (2009) The effect of species and colony size on the bleaching response of reef-building corals in the Florida Keys during the 2005 mass bleaching event. Coral Reefs 28:911–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0548-y
Brown BE (1997) Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs 16:S129–S138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380050249
Brown BE, Suharsono (1990) Damage and recovery of coral reefs affected by El Nino related seawater warming in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 8:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00265007
Bruno JF, Selig ER (2007) Regional decline of coral cover in the Indo-Pacific: timing, extent, and subregional comparisons. PLoS ONE 2:e711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000711
Carpenter KE, Abrar M, Aeby G, Aronson RB, Banks S, Bruckner A, Chiriboga A, Cortés J, Delbeek JC, DeVantier L, Edgar GJ, Edwards AJ, Fenner D, Guzmán HM, Hoeksema BW, Hodgson G, Johan O, Licuanan WY, Livingstone SR, Lovell ER (2008) One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321:560–563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159196
Coles SL, Brown BE (2003) Coral bleaching — capacity for acclimatization and adaptation. Adv Mar Biol 46:183–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2881(03)46004-5
Demmig B, Bjorkman O (1987) Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. Planta 171:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00391092
Eakin CM, Lough JM, Heron SF (2009) Climate vari- ability and change: monitoring data and evidence for increased coral bleaching stress. In: van Oppen MJH, Lough JM (eds) Coral bleaching: patterns, processes, causes and consequences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 41–67
Evensen NR, Bateman TG, Klepac CN, Schmidt-Roach S, Barreto M, Aranda M, Warner ME, Barshis DJ (2023) The roles of heating rate, intensity, and duration on the response of corals and their endosymbiotic algae to thermal stress. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 567:151930
Fagoonee I, Wilson HB, Hassell MP, Turner JR (1999) The dynamics of Zooxanthellae populations: a long-term study in the field. Science 283:843–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5403.843
Fitt W, Brown B, Warner M, Dunne R (2001) Coral bleaching: interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals. Coral Reefs 20:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380100146
Fordyce AJ, Ainsworth TD, Heron SF, Leggat W (2019) Marine heatwave hotspots in coral reef environments: physical drivers, ecophysiological outcomes, and impact upon structural complexity. Frountiers in Marine Science 6:498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00498
Forsman ZH, Page CA, Toonen RJ, Vaughan D (2015) Growing coral larger and faster: micro-colony-fusion as a strategy for accelerating coral cover. PeerJ 3:e1313. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1313
Frieler K, Meinshausen M, Golly A, Mengel M, Lebek K, Donner SD, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2012) Limiting global warming to 2°C is unlikely to save most coral reefs. Nat Clim Chang 3:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1674
Gintert BE, Manzello DP, Enochs IC, Kolodziej G, Carlton R, Gleason ACR, Gracias N (2018) Marked annual coral bleaching resilience of an inshore patch reef in the Florida Keys: A nugget of hope, aberrance, or last man standing? Coral Reefs 37:533–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-018-1678-x
Goreau TJF, Hayes R (2024) 2023 Record marine heatwaves: coral bleaching hotspot maps reveal global sea surface temperature extremes, coral mortality, and ocean circulation changes. Glob Coral Reef Alliance. https://doi.org/10.31223/X54M5R
Grottoli AG, Rodrigues LJ, Juarez C (2004) Lipids and stable carbon isotopes in two species of Hawaiian corals, Porites compressa and Montipora verrucosa, following a bleaching event. Mar Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1337-3
Grottoli AG, Warner ME, Levas SJ, Aschaffenburg MD, Schoepf V, McGinley M, Baumann J, Matsui Y (2014) The cumulative impact of annual coral bleaching can turn some coral species winners into losers. Glob Change Biol 20:3823–3833. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12658
Grottoli AG, Toonen RJ, Woesik R, Vega Thurber R, Warner ME, McLachlan RH, Price JT, Bahr KD, Baums IB, Castillo KD, Coffroth MA, Cunning R, Dobson KL, Donahue MJ, Hench JL, Iglesias-Prieto R, Kemp DW, Kenkel CD, Kline DI, Kuffner IB (2021) Increasing comparability among coral bleaching experiments. Ecol Appl 31(4):e02262
Guest JR, Baird AH, Maynard JA, Muttaqin E, Edwards AJ, Campbell SJ, Yewdall K, Affendi YA, Chou LM (2012) Contrasting patterns of coral bleaching susceptibility in 2010 suggest an adaptive response to thermal stress. PLoS ONE 7:e33353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033353
Hackerott S, Martell HA, Eirin-Lopez JM (2021) Coral environmental memory: causes, mechanisms, and consequences for future reefs. Trends Ecol Evol 36:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.014
Hazraty-Kari S, Tavakoli-Kolour P, Kitanobo S, Nakamura T, Morita M (2022) Adaptations by the coral Acropora tenuis confer resilience to future thermal stress. Communications Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04309-5
Hazraty-Kari S, Morita M, Tavakoli-Kolour P, Nakamura T, Harii S (2023a) Reactions of juvenile coral to three years of consecutive thermal stress. Sci Total Environ 863:161227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161227
Hazraty-Kari S, Morita M, Tavakoli-Kolour P, Harii S (2023b) Response of resistant larvae of the coral Acropora tenuis to future thermal stress. Mar Pollut Bull 192:115060
Hirose M, Hidaka M (2006) Early development of zooxanthella-containing eggs of the corals Porites cylindrica and Montipora digitata: the endodermal localization of zooxanthellae. Zoolog Sci 23:873–881. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.23.873
Hoegh-Guldberg O (2011) The impact of climate change on coral reef ecosystems. In: Dubinsky Z, Stambler N (eds) Corals reefs: an ecosystem in transition. Springer Science+Business Media, Berlin, pp 391–403
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328:1523–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189930
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Salvat B (1995) Periodic mass-bleaching and elevated sea temperatures:bleaching of outer reef slope communities in Moorea, French Polynesia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 121:181–190. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps121181
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Iglesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318:1737–1742. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152509
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Skirving W, Dove SG, Spady BL, Norrie A, Geiger EF, Liu G, La Cour JL, Manzello DP (2023) Coral reefs in peril in a record-breaking year. Science 382(6676):1238–1240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk45
Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Álvarez-Noriega M, Álvarez-Romero JG, Anderson KD, Baird AH, Babcock RC, Beger M, Bellwood DR, Berkelmans R, Bridge TC, Butler IR, Byrne M, Cantin NE, Comeau S, Connolly SR, Cumming GS, Dalton SJ, Diaz-Pulido G, Eakin CM (2017) Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543:373–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707
Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Baird AH, Connolly SR, Dietzel A, Eakin CM, Heron SF, Hoey AS, Hoogenboom MO, Liu G, McWilliam MJ, Pears RJ, Pratchett MS, Skirving WJ, Stella JS, Torda G (2018) Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages. Nature 556:492–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0041-2
IPCC (2023) Summary for policymakers. In: Lee H, Romero J (eds) Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing Team, ]. IPCC, Geneva, pp 1–34, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
Jeffrey SW, Humphrey GF (1975) New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 167:191–194
Lachs L, Donner SD, Mumby PJ, Bythell JC, Humanes A, East HK, Guest JR (2023) Emergent increase in coral thermal tolerance reduces mass bleaching under climate change. Nat Commun 14(1):4939
Lenth R (2019) emmeans: estimated marginal means (least-squares means). R Package Version 1(3):3
Liew YJ, Howells EJ, Wang X, Michell CT, Burt JA, Idaghdour Y, Aranda M (2020) Intergenerational epigenetic inheritance in reef-building corals. Nat Clim Chang 10:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0687-2
Liu G, Heron S, Eakin C, Muller-Karger F, Vega-Rodriguez M, Guild L et al (2014) Reef-scale thermal stress monitoring of coral ecosystems: new 5-km global products from NOAA coral reef watch. Remote Sensing 6(11):11579–11606. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61111579
Liu G, Skirving WJ, Geiger EF, De La Cour JL, Marsh BL, Heron SF, Tirak KV, Strong AE, Eakin CM (2017) NOAA Coral Reef Watch’s 5 km satellite coral bleaching heat stress monitoring product suite version 3 and four-month outlook version 4. Reef Encounter 32:39–45
Logan CA, Dunne JP, Eakin CM, Donner SD (2014) Incorporating adaptive responses into future projections of coral bleaching. Glob Change Biol 20:125–139
Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, Nakano Y, Sambali H, van Woesik R (2001) Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol Lett 4:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00203.x
Marzonie MR, Bay LK, Bourne DG, Hoey AS, Matthews S, Nielsen JJV, Harrison HB (2023) The effects of marine heatwaves on acute heat tolerance in corals. Glob Change Biol 29:404–416
Maynard JA, Anthony KRN, Marshall PA, Masiri I (2008) Major bleaching events can lead to increased thermal tolerance in corals. Mar Biol 155:173–182
McClanahan TR (2017) Changes in coral sensitivity to thermal anomalies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 570:71–85
Muller-Parker G, D’Elia CF, Cook CB (2015) Interactions between corals and their symbiotic algae. Coral Reef Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7249-5_5
Muscatine L (1990) The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Coral reefs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 75–87
Nakamura T, van Woesik R, Yamasaki H (2005) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis is reduced by water flow in the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 301:109–118. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps301109
Obura DO (2001) Can differential bleaching and mortality among coral species offer useful indicators for assessment and manage- ment of reefs under stress? Bull Mar Sci 69:777–791
Obura D, Gudka M, Samoilys M, Osuka K, Mbugua J, Keith DA, Porter S, Roche R, van Hooidonk R, Ahamada S, Araman A, Karisa J, Komakoma J, Madi M, Ravinia I, Razafindrainibe H, Yahya S, Zivane F (2022) Vulnerability to collapse of coral reef ecosystems in the Western Indian Ocean. Nature Sustainability 6:1–10
van Oppen MJH , Oliver JK, Putnam HM, Gates RD (2015) Building coral reef resilience through assisted evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences vol 112 pp 2307 2313
Palumbi SR, Barshis DJ, Traylor-Knowles N, Bay RA (2014) Mechanisms of reef coral resistance to future climate change. Science 344:895–898. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251336
Pandolfi JM, Connolly SR, Marshall DJ, Cohen AL (2011) Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification. Science 333:418–422
Parkinson JE, Coffroth MA, LaJeunesse TC (2015) New species of Clade B Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) from the greater Caribbean belong to different functional guilds: S. aenigmaticum sp. nov., S. antillogorgium sp. nov., S. endomadracis sp. nov., and S. pseudominutum sp. nov. J Phycol 51:850–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12340
Pratchett MS, McCowan D, Maynard JA, Heron SF (2013) Changes in bleaching susceptibility among corals subject to ocean warming and recurrent bleaching in Moorea. French Polynesia Plos ONE 8:e70443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070443
Pratchett MS, Heron SF, Mellin C, Cumming GS (2021) Recurrent mass-bleaching and the potential for ecosystem collapse on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. In: Canadell JG, Jackson RB (eds) Ecosystem collapse and climate change, ecological studies analysis and synthesis. Springer, Cham
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge (Chapter 10)
Rädecker N, Pogoreutz C, Gegner HM, Cárdenas A, Roth F, Bougoure J, Guagliardo P, Wild C, Pernice M, Raina JB, Meibom A, Voolstra CR (2021) Heat stress destabilizes symbiotic nutrient cycling in corals. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 118, e2022653118
Schoepf V, Stat M, Falter JL, McCulloch MT (2015) Limits to the thermal tolerance ofcorals adapted to a highly fluctuating, nat- urally extreme temperature environment. Sci Rep 5:17639
Schulte PM, Healy TM, Fangue NA (2011) Thermal performance curves, phenotypic plasticity, and the time scales of temperature exposure. Integr Comp Biol 51:691–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr097
Siebeck UE, Marshall NJ, Klüter A, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2006) Monitoring coral bleaching using a colour reference card. Coral Reefs 25:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0123-8
Singh T, Iijima M, Yasumoto K, Sakai K (2019) Effects of moderate thermal anomalies on Acropora corals around Sesoko Island Okinawa. PLoS ONE 14:e0210795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210795
Singh T, Sakai K, Ishida-Castañeda J, Iguchi A (2023) Short-term improvement of heat tolerance in naturally growing Acropora corals in Okinawa. PeerJ 11:e14629
Sutthacheep M, Saenghaisuk C, Pengsakun S, Yeemin T (2010) Bleaching and mortality of scleractinian corals at Hin Rap, Trat Province. In: Proc 36th Congress on Science and Technology of Thailand, p 4
Tavakoli-Kolour P, Sinniger F, Morita M, Nakamura T, Harii S (2023) Variability in thermal stress thresholds of corals across depths. Frountiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1210662
van Hooidonk R, Maynard JA, Planes S (2013) Temporary refugia for coral reefs in a warming world. Nat Clim Chang 3:508–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1829
van Woesik R, Sakai K, Ganase A, Loya Y (2011) Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434:67–76. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09203
Veal CJ, Holmes G, Nunez M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Osborn J (2010) A comparative study of methods for surface area and three-dimensional shape measurement of coral skeletons. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:241–253. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.241
Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the World. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville
Veron JEN, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Lenton TM, Lough JM, Obura DO, Pearce-Kelly P, Sheppard CRC, Spalding M, Stafford-Smith MG, Rogers AD (2009) The coral reef crisis: The critical importance of<350 ppm CO2. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.09.009
Warner ME, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (1999) Damage to photosystem II in symbiotic dinoflagellates: a determinant of coral bleaching. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 96, pp 8007–8012
Weis VM (2010) The susceptibility and resilience of corals to thermal stress: adaptation, acclimatization or both? Mol Ecol 19:1515–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04575.x
Ziegler M, Roder CM, Büchel C, Voolstra CR (2014) Limits to physiological plasticity of the coral Pocillopora verrucosa from the central Red Sea. Coral Reefs 33:1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-014-1192-8
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. S. Harii and Dr. F. Sinniger for their informative remarks and the staff of Sesoko Marine Research Station for their support. This study was supported by a grant from JSPS KAKENHI awarded to MM (21H05304 and 22H02369). English language editing was provided by Editage (https://www.editage.com).
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 21H05304, Masaya Morita, 22H02369, Masaya Morita
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Sanaz Hazraty-Kari conceived and designed the experiments, investigation, visualization, data analysis, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. Parviz Tavakoli-Kolour was involved in the investigation, data analysis, visualization, review, and editing. Takashi Nakamura contributed to the analytic tools, review, and editing. Masaya Morita assisted in the supervision, data analysis, and writing—review and editing.
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hazraty-Kari, S., Tavakoli-Kolour, P., Nakamura, T. et al. Susceptibility of Acropora tenuis to consecutive thermal stress. Coral Reefs 43, 1097–1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02530-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02530-8