Abstract
Background and aim
Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) represents a new in vivo imaging technique with high resolution (~250 μm) and tissue penetration (>1 cm) using the photoacoustic effect. While ultrasound contains anatomical information for lesion detection, MSOT provides functional information based on intrinsic tissue chromophores. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of combined ultrasound/MSOT imaging of breast cancer in patients compared to healthy volunteers.
Methods
Imaging was performed using a handheld MSOT system for clinical use in healthy volunteers (n = 6) and representative patients with histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma (n = 5) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, n = 2). MSOT values for haemoglobin and oxygen saturation were assessed at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm depth and selected wavelengths between 700 and 850 nm.
Results
Reproducible signals were obtained in all wavelengths with consistent MSOT signals in superficial tissue in breasts of healthy individuals. In contrast, we found increased signals for haemoglobin in invasive carcinoma, suggesting a higher perfusion of the tumour and tumour environment. For DCIS, MSOT values showed only little variation compared to healthy tissue.
Conclusions
This preliminary MSOT breast imaging study provided stable, reproducible data on tissue composition and physiological properties, potentially enabling differentiation of solid malignant and healthy tissue.
Key Points
• A handheld MSOT probe enables real-time molecular imaging of the breast.
• MSOT of healthy controls provides a reproducible reference for pathology identification.
• MSOT parameters allows for differentiation of invasive carcinoma and healthy tissue.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
With a worldwide incidence of about 1.4 million per year, a lifetime risk of 7% and accounting for 14% of all cancer-related deaths, breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women and of major importance for both individual and national healthcare [1]. Various imaging modalities such as x-ray mammography, ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET), also used as an indicator of therapeutic response [2], are commonly used in clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. Due to false-negative rates of up to 20%, especially with x-ray mammography, which remains the gold standard [3], further approaches have been introduced in recent studies to improve sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Using multimodal ultrasonic tomographic imaging, malignant breast lesions can be differentiated from healthy tissue and benign lesions by refractivity and frequency-dependent attenuation corresponding to compressibility and viscoelasticity of breast tissue [4]. However, specificity of diagnosis remains a main problem. To address this issue, shear-wave elastography was used as an adjunct to B-mode ultrasound to improve specificity of the assessment [5]. However, revealing tumour heterogeneity, tissue composition and vitality remains a challenge [6] as functional properties of breast tissue were not addressed by these approaches. Preliminary results of a two-dimensional (2D) diffuse optical imaging approach provided functional information reflected by greater light absorption due to higher total haemoglobin concentration in five breast cancer patients. However, the authors concluded that a second generation of the approach needs to overcome several limitations concerning limited tissue penetration, artefacts as well as detection of both oxygenated and deoxygenated Hb [3].
Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) represents a promising new approach for non-invasive imaging as it enables depiction of tissue characteristics and biological parameters with high spatial resolution and without the need for extrinsic contrast agents [7, 8]. Compared to other optical imaging modalities, MSOT has good tissue penetration up to a few centimetres [7, 9, 10]. The MSOT principle is based on the photoacoustic effect, first described in 1881 [11]. Absorption of pulsed, high-energy light causes thermoelastic expansion of scanned tissue, inducing the transmission of US waves. Due to specific properties of intrinsic absorbers like haemoglobin, melanin or lipids, image reconstruction can reveal absorber distribution, which is expected to differ in physiological and pathological conditions [8, 12]. MSOT has been evaluated in several (pre-)clinical studies investigating vascular and cardiac [10, 13], oncological (especially malignant melanoma) [14,15,16] and inflammatory diseases [17]. Regarding biological tissue properties of benign and malignant breast lesions, promising preclinical results have been reported using optical and photoacoustic imaging [18, 19].
Recently, a combined MSOT/US handheld approach for combined imaging of anatomical and functional properties has been developed and introduced [7, 9, 10]. Combining both imaging modalities overcomes previous limitations of MSOT concerning anatomical co-localisation, offering a higher potential for clinical translation.
We demonstrate the clinical applicability of a handheld optoacoustic/US scanner and provide the first evidence for an imaging signature associated with malignant versus healthy breast tissue.
Materials and methods
Technical description of MSOT imaging device
The clinical MSOT imaging system (MSOT Acuity Echo, iThera Medical, Munich) comprises a tunable optical parametric oscillator (OPO) that is pumped by an Nd:YAG laser to provide excitation pulses with a duration of 9 ns at wavelengths from 680 nm to 980 nm at a repetition rate 25 Hz and a peak pulse energy of 30 mJ at 730 nm. A handheld probe was used for MSOT imaging. This probe was connected to the OPO via a fibre bundle integrated into the probe with a diffuser providing an elliptical light spot of approximately 10 mm width and 15 mm length. The pulse energy was attenuated to ensure adherence with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) limits of maximum permissible exposure. The detector (256 transducer elements of centre frequency = 3 MHz; send/receive bandwidth = 56%; optoacoustic (OA) resolution ~250 μm) had a 125° angular coverage providing 2D cross-sectional images with a field of view (FOV) of 40 × 40 mm2 and 100 μm reconstructed pixel size. Multispectral images were acquired using one pulse per wavelength image. The MSOT penetration depth with the current setup was limited to 3 cm. The recorded images were reconstructed using a standard back-projection algorithm [20] after band-pass filtering and deconvolution with the electrical impulse response of the transducer. In order to partially compensate for light attenuation in tissue and to enhance the visualisation of deep structures, light fluence was modelled using exponential decay assuming μs = 15 cm-1, μa = 0.022 cm-1 at the isosbestic point (800 nm). To increase the signal-to-noise-ratio, a running average was applied over seven sequential frames if no detector movement was determined in the image sequence (Fig. 1A-C).
Reflection ultrasound computed tomography (RUCT)-mode US images were generated by the MSOT device using an US-imaging platform that consolidates transmit-receive boards and a function of triggered acquisition for synchronising US and OA image streams, as previously described [21]. Generated transmit pulses had a peak-to-peak voltage of 20 V and a frequency of 5 MHz. Detected echo signals were reconstructed using transmit aperture technique at a FOV of 40 × 40 mm2 with a pixel size of 180 μm and a theoretical minimal US resolution of 345 μm. US pulse-echo was applied in sub-apertures of one-quarter of the number detector elements (64 elements) with one single element continuously transmitting the pulse and all elements receiving the resulting echo signals. The single pulsing element swept across four sub-apertures and were combined to cover the entire angular coverage (256 elements) of the handheld array. The final image was generated by using spatial compounding of the sub-apertures.
MSOT image acquisition
MSOT images were acquired at five wavelengths: 700 nm, 730 nm, 760 nm, 800 nm and 850 nm. Individual contributions of oxygenated (HbO2) and deoxygenated haemoglobin (HbR) were calculated from data acquired and based on their spectral absorption characteristics by spectral unmixing. Subsequently, total Hb (HbT = HbO2 + HbR) and oxygen saturation (sO2 = HbO2/HbT) were calculated for regions of interest (ROIs) co-localised to structures identified on US images. MSOT values for each ROI represent the mean optoacoustic image value of all pixels. Subsequently, these MSOT parameters were pseudocolour-coded and visualised individually with the US image as background in composite images.
Measurements and patients
Initial examination with clinical MSOT was performed in healthy individuals (n = 6) using a handheld probe after obtaining written and informed consent of both healthy volunteers and breast cancer patients. Examinations were shorter than 15 min and eyes of examiners and patients were protected with laser safety goggles.
Measurements of both breasts were performed and ROIs (100 mm2) were placed, based on the US images, at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm depth indicating results in arbitrary units (AU). Furthermore, breasts with histologically-confirmed malignant transformations were imaged on imaging data acquired in five patients with invasive breast cancer prior to surgical intervention. ROIs were placed in the tumour centre and tumour margin, depicted as hypoechogenic lesion in the corresponding US. Signals were compared with peritumoral tissue, co-localising with non-pathological findings in US, and unaffected breast tissue in the same patient at the same depth as the measured tumour lesions in intraindividual controls. As characteristically pathological US signals of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, n = 2) do not exist, ROIs were defined in relation to ROIs of healthy controls. In both cases MRI revealed a diffuse infiltration of the entire breast by the DCIS, which was confirmed by histology upon complete mastectomy. Measurements of non-affected tissue served as intraindividual controls. For comparison, ratios (mean tumour/mean unaffected tissue) were calculated. ROIs covered 10 mm2 (invasive carcinoma) and 100 mm2 (DCIS).
Subsequently, results of MSOT imaging were compared to corresponding MRI and histological analyses (haematoxylin and eosin stain).
Statistical tests (unpaired t-test) and graphs were calculated using GraphPad Prism (version 7, GraphPad Software Inc.).
Results
The clinical MSOT imaging system enabled non-invasive real-time visualisation of the human breast. Parallel acquisition of RUCT-ultrasound and MSOT allowed for an exact anatomical co-localisation of physiological MSOT information enabling image fusion of pseudo colour-coded MSOT signals with US images. In the presented setup, individual images are reconstructed on the fly and refresh rate was possible at 25 Hz for single wavelength imaging. Multispectral imaging in this scenario is possible at up to 5 Hz (25 Hz * 5 WLs per multispectral image), and a 5Hz refresh rate per multispectral image.
Imaging of healthy controls
In healthy individuals, constant and reproducible MSOT signals with only little variation between single measurements were detected at 0.5–1.5 cm depth. As expected, single-wavelength MSOT image intensities changed with wavelength (reflecting the absorbance profile of tissue chromophores), the variability in measurements was irrespective of imaging wavelength. Accordingly, the estimated values for Hb, HbO2, HbT and sO2 were reproducibly stable in the healthy tissue. With increasing tissue depth, MSOT signals showed an overall reduction of mean values and greater spread due to light scattering and absorption (Fig. 1D-F).
Imaging of malignancies
In comparison to unaffected breast tissue and peritumoral tissue, MSOT of invasive carcinoma showed increased signals for Hb, HbO2 and HbT. Calculated tumour-control ratios for deoxygenated Hb showed a significant increase in tumour centre (1.13, SD = 0.03, p = 0,019) and tumour margin (1.07, SD = 0.06, p = 0,031), each compared with peritumoral tissue (Fig. 2A). Accordingly, ratios for HbT were significantly increased in both the tumour centre (1.18, SD = 0,04, p = 0,002) and the tumour margin (1.13, SD = 0.04, p = 0,007) compared with peritumoral tissue (Fig. 2C). Calculated sO2 ratios revealed no significant differences (calculated ratios: 1.03 for tumour centre, 1.03 for peritumoral tissue, Fig. 2D).
Thus, similar sO2 but increased Hb signals in the tumour centre suggest higher tumour perfusion compared with healthy tissue due to tumour neovascularisation and tumour-associated inflammation in the surrounding tissue. Accordingly, the MSOT signal was most elevated in the centre and margin of the tumour lesion (Fig. 2E). MSOT results were supplemented with MRI images, which showed gadolinium enhancement exemplarily in a lesion of the right breast with irregular margins (Fig. 2F). Diagnosis was corroborated by postoperative histology confirming invasive breast carcinoma (Fig. 2G).
MSOT ratios for all parameters showed no obvious increase in the two DCIS cases when compared to healthy breast tissue (mean Hb: 1.02, mean HbO2: 1.07 and mean HbT: 1.038, Fig. 3A,B). However, a non-mass, diffuse gadolinium enhancement was detected in all quadrants of the left breast by MRI (Fig. 3C) and cancerous infiltration of the entire breast by the DCIS was confirmed by histology after mastectomy (Fig. 3D).
There was no relevant operator dependency noted for handheld MSOT of breast carcinoma (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Discussion
The possibility of assessing physiological and molecular properties of a tumour non-invasively during regular screening and staging examinations would facilitate current cancer care. The impact of tumour hypoxia, neovascularisation and the tumour environment on tumour growth and metastasis has been previously described for breast cancer [22,23,24,25,26]. MSOT offers semi-quantitative assessment of such functional parameters via distinction between different intrinsic absorbers (haemoglobin, melanin, lipids etc.) and has proven to be a promising approach in various applications, with only a recent emergence of clinical studies [9, 10, 13, 16, 17]. In preliminary experimental studies first photoacoustic image patterns of breast cancer have been described using the Twente Mammoscope [27]. Here we evaluated in a feasibility study for human breast whether clinical MSOT is (1) applicable, (2) reproducible and comparable within individuals scanned, and (3) allows distinction between healthy and malignant tissue in vivo.
As US is an established imaging procedure, the hybrid US/MSOT handheld probe is simple to use in the clinical setting and examinations proved to be quick, performed within the same timeframe as US imaging. MSOT measurements of healthy tissue were reproducible and interindividually comparable with low variance within our study group (Fig. 1). Thus, our results show first evidence for an imaging signature that may be representative of healthy breast tissue. Values obtained from healthy individuals may serve as a baseline for assessment of disease as well as monitoring of therapeutic approaches.
Clinical MSOT characterised tissue properties within invasive carcinoma formation: deoxygenated and oxygenated and especially total haemoglobin were increased in the tumour centre and margin when compared to healthy tissue, suggesting high perfusion and neovascularisation. However, the oxygen saturation was not significantly increased. Similar findings of elevated perfusion but low oxygen saturation in invasive carcinoma have been described previously [18, 19, 26, 28, 29]. The results can be interpreted as an indicator of intratumoral heterogeneity and potentially aid the characterisation of tumour composition.
Only a small increase in MSOT signals in DCIS could be a correlate of inhomogeneous tissue composition with both oxygenated and deoxygenated areas/increased and decreased perfusion within the same intratumoral ROI. Analysis of additional (intrinsic) parameters like lipids might help to further understand tissue characterisation and differentiation.
Our initial study comprises only a limited, exemplary number of samples but is thought to serve as a paradigm and inspiration for future study cohorts of relevant size. In addition, we acknowledge the use of a simple fluence correction method to correct for the attenuation of light with imaging depth. Despite this assumption, ROI analysis showed consistent results at multiple imaging depths in healthy tissue. Furthermore, ROI analysis was performed at similar depths in the breast carcinoma cases to minimise the effects introduced by shortcomings of fluence assumptions on the measured MSOT values. Furthermore, advances in system technology, image reconstruction and unmixing algorithms are expected to improve device performance by increasing tissue penetration for detecting deep lesions and specificity of absorber detection [8, 12]. Operator dependency of combined US/optoacoustic imaging may also have a potential impact for the MSOT results, and this needs to be further investigated in larger patient cohorts.
In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility of hybrid acquisition of US and MSOT signal with a handheld probe, enabling non-invasive clinical breast imaging with consistent, reproducible acquisition of anatomical and functional information. We anticipate that these findings will contribute to continuously translating MSOT imaging into the clinics. We believe that non-invasive tissue characterisation in breast cancer is of great benefit for development of personalized breast cancer care.
Abbreviations
- DCIS:
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MSOT:
-
Multispectral optoacoustic tomography
- OA:
-
Optoacoustic
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- RUCT:
-
Reflection ultrasound computed tomography
- US:
-
Ultrasound
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90
Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S et al (2006) Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med 47:1059–1066
Erickson-Bhatt SJ, Roman M, Gonzalez J, et al (2015) Noninvasive surface imaging of breast cancer in humans using a hand-held optical imager. Biomed Phys Eng Express 1(4). doi:10.1088/2057-1976/1/4/045001
Zografos G, Liakou P, Koulocheri D et al (2015) Differentiation of BIRADS-4 small breast lesions via Multimodal Ultrasound Tomography. Eur Radiol 25:410–418
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435–449
Song JL, Chen C, Yuan JP, Sun SR (2016) Progress in the clinical detection of heterogeneity in breast cancer. Cancer Med 5:3475–3488
Buehler A, Kacprowicz M, Taruttis A, Ntziachristos V (2013) Real-time handheld multispectral optoacoustic imaging. Opt Lett 38:1404–1406
Valluru KS, Willmann JK (2016) Clinical photoacoustic imaging of cancer. Ultrasonography 35:267–280
Dima A, Ntziachristos V (2016) In-vivo handheld optoacoustic tomography of the human thyroid. Photoacoustics 4:65–69
Taruttis A, Timmermans AC, Wouters PC, Kacprowicz M, van Dam GM, Ntziachristos V (2016) Optoacoustic imaging of human vasculature: feasibility by using a handheld probe. Radiology 281:256–263
Bell AG (1881) The production of sound by radiant energy. Science 2:242–253
Taruttis A, Ntziachristos V (2015) Advances in real-time multispectral optoacoustic imaging and its applications. Nat Photonics 9:219–227
Taruttis A, Wildgruber M, Kosanke K et al (2013) Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of myocardial infarction. Photoacoustics 1:3–8
McCormack D, Al-Shaer M, Goldschmidt BS et al (2009) Photoacoustic detection of melanoma micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes. J Biomech Eng 131, 074519
McNally LR, Mezera M, Morgan DE et al (2016) Current and emerging clinical applications of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) in Oncology. Clin Cancer Res 22:3432–3439
Neuschmelting V, Lockau H, Ntziachristos V, Grimm J, Kircher MF (2016) Lymph node micrometastases and in-transit metastases from melanoma: in vivo detection with multispectral optoacoustic imaging in a mouse model. Radiology 280:137–150
Bhutiani N, Grizzle WE, Galandiuk S et al (2016) Non-invasive imaging of colitis using multispectral optoacoustic tomography. J Nucl Med 58:1009–1012
Grosenick D, Rinneberg H, Cubeddu R, Taroni P (2016) Review of optical breast imaging and spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 21, 091311
Tromberg BJ, Shah N, Lanning R et al (2000) Non-invasive in vivo characterisation of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy. Neoplasia 2:26–40
Xu M, Wang LV (2005) Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 71, 016706
Mercep E, Burton NC, Claussen J, Razansky D (2015) Whole-body live mouse imaging by hybrid reflection-mode ultrasound and optoacoustic tomography. Opt Lett 40:4643–4646
Folkman J (1994) Angiogenesis and breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:441–443
Vaupel P, Hockel M (2000) Blood supply, oxygenation status and metabolic micromilieu of breast cancers: characterisation and therapeutic relevance. Int J Oncol 17:869–879
Becker A, Grosse Hokamp N, Zenker S et al (2015) Optical in vivo imaging of the alarmin S100A9 in tumor lesions allows for estimation of the individual malignant potential by evaluation of tumor-host cell interaction. J Nucl Med 56:450–456
Gilkes DM, Semenza GL (2013) Role of hypoxia-inducible factors in breast cancer metastasis. Future Oncol 9:1623–1636
Ham M, Moon A (2013) Inflammatory and microenvironmental factors involved in breast cancer progression. Arch Pharm Res 36:1419–1431
Heijblom M, Piras D, Brinkhuis M et al (2015) Photoacoustic image patterns of breast carcinoma and comparisons with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and vascular stained histopathology. Sci Rep 5:11778
Ntziachristos V, Yodh AG, Schnall MD, Chance B (2002) MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions. Neoplasia 4:347–354
Enfield LC, Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Douek M (2009) Optical tomography of breast cancer-monitoring response to primary medical therapy. Target Oncol 4:219–233
Compliance with ethical standards
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Moritz Wildgruber.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:
Jing Claussen and Steven J. Ford are employees of iThera Medical, a manufacturer of commercial optoacoustic scanners.
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was waived because scans were obtained during a pilot test series, which was covered under the Declaration of Helsinki §37 (‘individual healing research’)
Methodology
• prospective
• experimental
• performed at one institution
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Anne Becker and Max Masthoff contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 96 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, A., Masthoff, M., Claussen, J. et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach. Eur Radiol 28, 602–609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x