Abstract
Cancer caused by fundamental defects in cell cycle regulation leads to uncontrolled growth of cells. In spite of the treatment with chemotherapeutic agents of varying nature, multiple resistance mechanisms are identified in cancer cells. Similarly, numerous variations, which decrease the metabolism of chemotherapeutics agents and thereby increasing the toxicity of anticancer drugs have been identified. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an anticancer drug widely used to treat many cancers in the human body. Its broad targeting range is based upon its capacity to act as a uracil analogue, thereby disrupting RNA and DNA synthesis. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is an enzyme majorly involved in the metabolism of pyrimidines in the human body and has the same metabolising effect on 5-FU, a pyrimidine analogue. Multiple mutations in the DPD gene have been linked to 5-FU toxicity and inadequate dosages. DPD inhibitors have also been used to inhibit excessive degradation of 5-FU for meeting appropriate dosage requirements. This article focusses on the role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in the metabolism of the anticancer drug 5-FU and other associated drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer is the abnormal transformation and proliferation of cells triggered by underlying genetic anomalies. Oncogenic cells grow indefinitely and invade other tissues and organs leading to cancer. Multiple mechanisms of oncogenic activation exist and multiple subtypes of cancers exist [1]. Anticancer drugs are a class of drugs that show effect in combating malignant cancers by either killing or inhibiting the growth of such cells. Administration of these anticancer drugs is done as single drug therapy or as a multidrug therapy/combination therapy [1, 2]. 5-Fluorouracil is the most commonly used anticancer drug for solid cancers. Functioning as a pyrimidine analogue, 5-Fluorouracil acts as an antimetabolite and disrupts RNA and DNA synthesis, and thereby combats cancerous cells. It is activated inside the cells by multiple enzymes and degraded by Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) through the pyrimidine degradation pathway. This catabolic activity displayed by the enzyme on 5-FU plays a crucial role in determining its toxicity and efficiency towards 5-FU-based cancer therapies.
5-Fluorouracil
Cancer cells divide rapidly by utilising cellular metabolites. Antimetabolites target this characteristic and act by competing with normal metabolites for the same targets and displacing them competitively [3]. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), one such antimetabolite being used in cancer treatment since 1957, is a heterocyclic aromatic pyrimidine analogue with a Fluorine atom at the C-5 position of Uracil [4]. Also known by its trade name Efudex, or Carac, 5-FU is a key anticancer drug used for broad-spectrum antitumor activity and is commonly used in the chemotherapeutic treatments as a sole remedy for solid tumours such as breast, colorectal, lungs, and head and neck cancers [5]. It interferes with DNA synthesis by acting as Uracil analogue and inhibits the essential biosynthesis process such as DNA and RNA synthesis by incorporating it into them using the same facilitated transport mechanisms as Uracil and gets converted into several active metabolites intracellularly [3, 6]. These active metabolites disrupt not only RNA synthesis, but also inhibit the action of thymidylate synthase. The half-life of 5-FU is around 4–5 min after an intravenous bolus infusion [7]. The appropriate dosage varies between cases and depending upon the regimen followed and patient’s clinical status. It also lowers the infection-fighting blood cells and aids in blood clotting. Hence, administration of any live vaccines while using 5-FU increases the chances of getting infected. Some of the antimetabolites and other anticancer drugs and their mechanism of actions are listed in the Table 1.
Metabolism of 5-fluorouracil
5-Fluorouracil is metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, which catabolises the drug 5-FU into dihydrofluorouracil (DHFU). DPD catabolizes more than 80% of the 5-FU in the liver mononuclear cells [8]. The activity of DPD is widely distributed in a variety of organs, such as the small intestinal mucosa, and hence, is termed as rate-limiting enzyme for 5-FU. The remaining 5-FU gets converted into fluorouridine monophosphate (FUMP) directly by orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (ORPT) with phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) as a cofactor, or indirectly by fluorouridine (FUR) under the action of uridine phosphorylase (UP) and uridine kinase (UK). Furthermore, phosphorylation of FUMP to FUDP occurs, which subsequently phosphorylated into an active metabolite (FUTP), or to FdUDP by ribonucleotide reductase (RR). Phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of FdUDP leads to the formation of the active metabolites FdUTP and FdUMP, respectively. Another pathway, which involves the catalytic conversion of 5-FU to FUDR by thymidine phosphorylase (TP), further phosphorylates it by thymidine kinase (TK) to form FdUMP. The converted FdUMP causes gastrointestinal and myelotoxicity, respectively. FdUMP inhibits thymidylate synthase, leading to activation of DNA damage response pathways [9]. A meta-analysis of six randomised clinical trials performed on patients assigned to bolus 5-FU infusion also showed more haematological toxicity as compared to individuals with continuous intravenous infusion [3]. Moreover, tegafur and capecitabine are the antineoplastic drugs that are metabolised to 5-FU and are given orally for metastatic colorectal cancer [2].
RNA misincorporation
Disruption of normal RNA function occurs due to the misincorporation of the metabolite FUTP. In human colon cancer, a significant correlation was found between lost colonogenic potential and the misincorporation of 5-FU in RNA [10, 11]. This even leads to the toxicity to RNA at multiple levels and inhibition of the maturation of pre-rRNA to mature rRNA [12]. It is also found disrupting the post-transcriptional modification of tRNAs and the activation of the snRNA/protein complexes, which stops the splicing of the pre-mRNA. Even at the low concentration of 5-FU, polyadenylation of mRNA is inhibited [13, 14]. The in vitro studies indicate that by misincorporation of 5-FU, the RNA processing is disrupted, thereby affecting the cellular metabolism and viability.
Thymidylate Synthases are involved in the conversion of deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP) from deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) by acting as a catalyst using 5, 10 methylene-tetrahydrofolate (5, 10-CH2-THF) as the methyl donor. This reaction provides the sole de novo source of thymidylate for DNA replication and repair mechanism. TS functions as the site for both CH2THF and nucleotide binding. FdUMP, the metabolite of 5-FU binds to the nucleotide binding site of the TS, thereby forms a stable ternary complex with the enzyme, and inhibits dTMP synthesis. Depletion of deoxythymidine triphosphate occurs due to subsequent depletion of dTMP, and this leads to the deviation in the levels of other deoxynucleotides via the various mechanisms [15, 16]. This imbalance disrupts the DNA synthesis and repair, and hence, results in lethal DNA damage. Also, the accumulation of dUMP due the TS inhibition leads to increasing the level of deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP), which causes the misincorporation of both dUTP and FdUTP into the DNA, and hence, leading to DNA strand breaks and cell death [17, 18].
5-Fluorouracil catabolism in the body
The breakdown of 5-fluorouracil requires DPD enzyme, abundantly present in liver and intestinal mucosa. DPD catabolises 5-FU to 5, 6-dihydro-5-fluorouracil (FUH2), also known as Dihydrofluorouracil, which then gets converted into α-fluoro-β-ureido propionic acid and α-fluoro- β-alanine (FBAL), also known as fluoro-ureidopropionate, and fluoro-alanine, respectively as shown in Fig. 1. Upon an investigation of the kinetics of 5-FU and its metabolites in cancer patients by radiolabelled 5-FU, it was identified that more than 60% of the administered drug was excreted out as FBAL in urine within 24 h of administration [7]. Moreover, several patients with the deficiency of DPD have shown symptoms of being at high risk for severe toxicity including diarrhoea and neurotoxicity [3].
Modifications of 5-FU
The overall response rate for this drug as a single agent is quite low. Important modulation strategies, which have, hence, been developed to increase its anticancer activity, also help in overcoming its current resistance. Hence, the strategies, such as decreasing 5-FU degradation, increasing 5-FU activation, increasing the TS inhibition by FdUMP, and using multidrug therapies, make it the ideal drug for the treatment. For optimal binding of FdUMP to Thymidylate synthase (TS), it is necessary to have a high level of intercellular reduced folate CH2THF. In both in vitro [19, 20] as well as in vivo [21] conditions, Leucovorin (LV) has expanded the intercellular concentration of CH2THF in many cell lines identified to have 5-FU toxicity. LV is anabolised to CH2THF after entering the cell through the reduced folate carrier, and is further polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamate synthetase [22, 23]. This enhances the ternary complex stabilised with TS and FdUMP. It helps in enhancing the Thymidylate synthase inhibition by increasing the 5, 10-methylene tetrahydrofolate pool. Seemingly, the degradation of the drug by the DPD enzyme is major in tumours as compared to the anabolic or activating pathways. Therefore, by inhibiting the activity of the DPD enzyme, more drugs can be made to enter the anabolic pathway which may show a satisfactory result. Therefore, the inhibition of DPD activity increases the antitumor potential of the drug which is very vital for the patients whose tumours are resistant due to an increase in the intratumoral DPD activity. Several DPD inhibitors have been introduced clinically.
Inhibitors of DPD
The availability of 5-FU is reduced as it gets degraded into DHFU by DPD. To inhibit this degradation by DPD, a combination of uracil with the 5-FU prodrug ftorafur, in a combination of 4:1 is used, i.e., UFT (Uracil/Ftorafur) [24]. The Eniluracil and 5-chlorodihyropyrimidine, which can be used in inhibiting the degradation of 5-FU by DPD, improve the tumour response rate from 13 to 94% in a rat model [25]. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, which remains unchanged even after absorption through the GI walls, is available to 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5′DFUR) in the liver by the action of carboxylesterase and cytidine deaminase. 5-DFUR is then converted into 5-FU majorly by thymidine phosphorylase or by uridine phosphorylase as shown in Fig. 2 [26, 27]. Capecitabine has a much higher response rate to colorectal cancer than 5-FU/LV, i.e., 24.8% vs 15.5%, and hence, is preferred more [28].
Methotrexate (MTX) is another drug identified to be converting dihydrofolate (DHF) into tetrahydrofolate (THF) and acting as an antifolate inhibitor of DHFR by inhibiting both purine and thymidine biosynthesis by synergising with 5-FU when administered before 5-FU [29]. The combination of both 5-FU with MTX is more effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in comparison to bolus single-agent 5-FU [30].
Interferons have shown a negative regulatory effect on the growth of both the normal and malignant cells in the in vitro as well as the in vivo environment, and have found to produce much higher cytotoxicity in various cell lines. Studies reported that the response rate of the combination of both 5-FU with IFN-α is 42–54% in Phase II clinical trials 57–58; moreover, IFN-α and 5-FU/LV can be given as adjuvant therapy to the patients who have been suffering from the colon cancer [31].
S-1 is a combination of the three drugs (Fig. 3) consisting of the prodrug Tegafur, along with 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP)—a DPD inhibitor, and potassium oxonate, in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1 [32, 33]. S-1 helps in continuous release of 5-FU, with more potent DPD modulation in this combination. Potassium oxonate decreases the potential for typical 5-FU gastrointestinal toxicity, particularly diarrhoea, which is seen in most fluoropyrimidine drugs [34]. CDHP is known to competitively inhibit DPD about 200 times more effectively than uracil as identified in the in vitro studies. The chemical structures of few DPD inhibitors are shown in the Fig. 4. Oxonate (oxo) is an inhibitor of Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and is distributed majorly in the GI mucosa. After oral administration, oxo selectively improves the gastrointestinal toxicity of the drug by decreasing the production of FdUMP in the GI mucosa. Hence, TS-1 acts as the most promising anticancer drug for advanced or metastatic gastric carcinoma [35].
Side effects of 5-FU
5-FU has a narrow therapeutic index; 10–26% of patients treated with fluoropyrimidine-based drugs develop an early-onset severe life-threatening fluoropyrimidine toxicity [36, 37]. Some of the side effects caused by 5-fluorouracil, when administered intravenously, are inflammation of the mouth, loss of appetite, and low blood cell count. In severe cases, it can also lead to hair loss and inflammation of the skin (see Fig. 5). Irritation at the site of the application is common when administered as a cream [38, 39].
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
DPD is an enzyme encoded by the gene DPYD [40]. This enzyme functions by metabolising the two endogenous nitrogen-containing pyrimidines: Thymine and Uracil, and hence, is also known as dihydrothymine dehydrogenase or uracil reductase [41]. In addition to metabolising naturally occurring pyrimidines, it is also known for metabolising the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil [39]. More than 80% of the metabolism of the administered anticancer drug 5-FU is performed by DPD. The DPD is a rate-controlling enzyme of endogenous pyrimidine and fluoropyrimidine catabolism. Its activity shows a wide range of individual variation [42,43,44] which is known to have resulted in a broad range of enzymatic deficiencies from partial loss of enzymatic activity, which is seen in 3–5% of the population, to complete loss of the same, seen in 0.2% of the population, which can consequently lead to severe polyvisceral 5-FU-induced toxicity [45, 46].
Mechanism of action of DPD on 5-FU
The administered 5-FU get catabolised into an inactive pharmacological molecule, 5-fluoro-5, 6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH2), which further gets converted into fluoro-beta-ureidopropionate (FUPA) and subsequently to fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) by dihydropyrimidinase (DPYS) and beta-ureidopropionase (UPB1) enzymes, respectively. This anabolic conversion of the 5-FU into a metabolically active nucleotide form is an essential step in the action of 5-FU. However, DPD reduces the availability of 5-FU. Hence, an increased expression of DPD in tumours usually results in the resistance against nitrogen heterocycle containing anticancer agents such as 5-FU [47]. The absence of these enzymes, or any single nucleotide mutations in the gene may show an absolute deficiency in its enzymatic level. DPD polymorphisms, hence, shall result in deficient phenotypes depending upon the mutation and linking them to its polymorphic activity with a total frequency of 3–5%. Insufficient production of this enzyme further leads to the over-accumulation followed by the toxicity of the drug (5-FU). An extensive variety of clinical manifestation and abnormal metabolism of 5-FU is the primary defect found in most of the population.
Function and characterisation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
Human DPYD gene encodes sequence for an enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the first rate-limiting enzyme in a three-step metabolic pathway for the degradation of pyrimidine bases [48]. For the synthesis of β-alanine in mammals, this pathway is the major route [49]. Deficiency of the DPD enzyme in the pediatric patients leads to an association with congenital thymine-uraciluria, which is a complex hereditary disease, that shows multiple symptoms such as epilepsy, slow development, and microcephaly [50, 51]. DPYD gene has been mapped on a 1p22 chromosome and has been found to contain 4400 nucleotides with 23 coding exons which span 950 Kbs. The activity of this enzyme is controlled both at transcription as well as translation level by the transcription factor SP1, SP3, and by microRNA-27a (miR-27a) and microRNA-27b, respectively [52]. Naguib and his colleagues, who studied on DPD activity in humans, and in tumour xenografts, concluded that the activity of these enzymes was high in human liver; however, it is highly variable in tumour patients. Moreover, DPD is known to show a circadian pattern both in human as well as in animals [39, 53]. PMNC-DPD activity is also recognised to display circadian variations and to be involved in differences in blood 5-FU concentrations through an intravenous infusion [54]. A few studies have revealed that DPD shows a variable expression during tumour which justifies the variance in pharmacological responses of tumour towards 5-FU. Those patients having increased expression of DPD have shown resistance to the 5-FU drug even when the level of thymidylate synthase expression was too low [55]. Several studies have proved that there is a positive correlation among the levels of tumoral DPD and resistance against the anticancer agents, while alcohol and smoking have found to decrease 5-FU potential [56].
Polymorphisms of DPYD
Recent studies have indicated that DPD deficiency leads to the genetic aberration in the DPYD comprising of exon skipping and deletion, and missense mutations give the DPD a deficient phenotype [35]. 5-FU-treated patients have been found to be having SNP-associated DPD variants which come under grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities. More than 50 polymorphisms in DPYD have been recognised. Studies have identified multiple novel variations of DPD enzyme in Korean population influencing the effects of 5-FU. Among the novel genetic variants − 832 G > A, − 474 C > T, − 131 C > A, and − 106 G > A are the major SNP mutations. Additionally, it has been found that DPD enzyme activity in the Korean population is found to be slightly higher than those of the Japanese and white population [57]. Similar studies have identified a common relevant polymorphism in the DPYD gene which are DPYD*5A (1627A > G, I543 V) and DPYD*9A along with DPYD*2A (IVS14p 1G > A) in the Chinese population. All of these mutants reduce the enzymatic activity of the DPYD enzyme followed by the increased toxicity of 5-FU [58]. Moreover, among Dutch patients, it has been reported that sequence analysis of the coding exon of DPD has three novel mutations and four rare variants including three missense mutations (c 851G > T, c 1280 T > C, c 2843 T > C), and one intrinsic mutation c2766 + 87 G > A. There are three main DPYD genetic variations, which have been consistently associated with the toxicity of the 5-FU: 2*A rs3918290 G > A, which lead to the skipping of entire exon 14; *13rs5588602 T > G which changes an Ile56Ser amino acid to a flavin-binding domain of the enzyme; and the rs67376798 A > T which causes a change in a Asp949 Val amino acid to an iron–sulphur motif [59, 60]. DPYD IVS14 + 1G > A mutation causes a 165-bp deletion in the mRNA, and thus is formed the DPYD*2A allele followed by the newly truncated protein product, which is formed because this mutation has deficient catalytic activity. Several analyses related to the DPD polymorphism have showed that IVS14 + 1G > A polymorphism is the most frequent among the cancer patients which leads to severe 5-FU toxicity especially in the Caucasian people [61, 62]; DPYD*13 (rs55886062, 1679T > G), DPYD*9A (rs1801265, 85T > C), DPYD*2A (rs3918290, IVS14 + 1G > A), and 2846A > T (rs67376798, D949 V). DPYD 85T > C polymorphism causes the conversion of Cys29Arg with the formation of the DPYD*9A allele (Fig. 6). Patients with DPYD*2A homozygous mutation have shown a complete deficiency of the activity of this enzyme, while in heterozygous case, there are a 50% absences of the enzymatic activity which leads to the life-threatening condition due to 5-FU accumulation in the body [40], whereas DPYD 85T > C polymorphism was 29.4% as a heterozygote mutation and 7.1% as a homozygous mutation [63, 64].
Recent research done on population analysis of DPD catalytic activity has indicated that at least 3–4% of the healthy population could be partially deficient to the DPD enzyme activity. In the absence of the drug treatment, these individual do not show any symptoms, but they could develop a high risk of toxicity if exposed to 5-FU during chemotherapy [65]. Research has shown that 3% of the Caucasian population carries DPYD*2A polymorphism in the exon region, while the Japanese population did not have this variation. However, the mutation in allele DPYD*5 (rs1801159) in 13 exon region was reported to be in 14% of Caucasian, and 15% and 12% in Egyptian and Tunisians, respectively. Among them all, the Japanese population has found to be having the highest frequency of DPYD*5 (rs1801159), i.e., 35% followed by Taiwanese, 21% and African-American, 22.7% [66]. Substitution at 1679T > G in the DPYD gene results in the DPYD*13 allele with the change I560S. Similarly, DPYD 2846A > T mutation causes D949 V change. Both of these polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with low enzyme activity. However, these have been observed to be rare [67, 68].
Clinical manifestation due to the deficiencies
DPD deficiency is a disorder inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. It shows a broad range of phenotypic variability, which ranges from no symptoms to intellectual disabilities, motor retardation, and convulsions. Additionally, homozygous and heterozygous individuals carrying mutations in this gene can develop severe 5-FU toxicity. The lack of genotype–phenotype correlations and a possibility of other factors playing yet undetected roles in the manifestation of the neurological abnormalities shall make the management and education of asymptomatic DPD-deficient individuals more challenging [69, 70]. Deficiencies in the DPD enzyme may lead to the toxicities of grade 3 or be even more significant due to the 5-FU toxicity. Since the symptom for the toxicity has appeared after the administration of the drug, intensive care and medical interventions are required [71]. Some clinical manifestations that have occurred due to the toxicity of 5-FU are fever, mucositis, stomatitis, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. In severe cases, it may lead to neurological abnormalities such as cerebellar ataxia and changes in cognitive functions. Several cases have been recorded in which patients have gone to coma, leukopenia, neutropenia, and possibly thrombocytopenia and anaemia [5]. IVS14 + 1G > A, the DPYD* 2A allele is considered as the most frequent SNP. A G–A mutation in the GT splice donor site during DPD pre-mRNA splicing leads to exon 14 being skipped which is immediately upstream of the mutated splice donor site [72, 73]. Another mutation, 2846A > T, causing D949V change, is located on exon 22 and is known to interfere directly with cofactor binding or electron transport [70, 74]. 1156 G > T, causing E386T change is located on exon 11, resulting in a premature termination codon leading to the formation of a truncated protein, a non-functional enzyme [75]. 2657G > A change, also known as DPYD* 9B allele, is known to cause R886H change leading to a missense mutation on exon 21. This reduces DPD function to 25% of the normal [76]. A 1590T > C change on the DPYD gene promoter, located in the IFNc-binding site, potentially results in lowered DPYD expression [72].
Managing the deficiencies and toxicity
The dosage of 5-FU can be reduced or increased in the following sessions according to the enzymatic status of the DPD observed during the first treatment, and depending on the tolerance level of the patient [77]. If the patient is suspected with the toxicity of 5-FU occurred due to the DPD deficiency, then administration of the drug should be stopped immediately followed by the utilisation of haemodialysis and haemoperfusion to rapidly remove any remaining traces of the drug from the body [71, 78]. Additionally, tumours have also been noted to express variable levels of DPD activity. This may explain the various tumour responses observed in 5-FU. Tumours with relatively low levels of DPD indicate a sensitivity to 5-FU, while tumours with relatively high levels of DPD indicate resistance towards 5-FU. Both the conditions should be considered while devising proper dosage administration. Other alternatives are unblocking the thymidylate synthesis, with the help of the administration of thymidine or uridine, which competitively binds to the drug target. Additionally, to boost the WBC count, colony-stimulating growth factor can be administered in the patients with toxicity. Mainly, an aggressive, holistic, and supportive care is the only way to treat it [71].
Conclusions
Cancer, a disease caused by abnormal proliferation of cells is combated by anticancer drugs, a class of drugs that shows effect in combating these cells by either killing or inhibiting their growth. 5-Fluorouracil, a chemotherapeutic antimetabolite, is the most commonly used anticancer drug for many types of cancers. This Uracil analogue interferes with the essential biosynthetic processes such as DNA and RNA synthesis and leads to their inhibition. The enzyme DPD catabolises more than 80% of the drug in the liver mononuclear cells into F-ß-alanine. DPD deficiencies are caused by the mutations in the DPYD gene, such as exon skipping and deletions, and missense mutations give a DPD-deficient phenotype. The major DPYD genetic variations that have been consistently associated with 5-FU toxicity are the DYPD 2*A allele (IVS14 + 1G > A mutation in intron 14 coupled with exon 14 deletion) consisting of a G > A variation (rs3918290), the DPYD*13 allele in exon 13 consisting of 167T > G variation (rs5588602), and in exon 22 consisting of 2846A > T variation (rs67376798). Protein products formed due to these mutations have extremely low catalytic activity. At least 3–4% of the healthy population is partially deficient to the DPD enzyme activity which stays undetected in the absence of the 5-FU administration. However, they stay at high risk of developing toxicity towards 5-FU during chemotherapy. Such deficiencies may lead to grade 3 or even higher level toxicity often leading to the death of the patient in homozygous mutants. Multiple studies have identified that high intratumoral activity of DPD markedly decreases the cytotoxic effect of 5-FU. Major modulators to decrease its catabolic activity have also been implemented. Such drugs are used in combination with 5-FU to act as a substrate for DPD, instead of targeting 5-FU.
References
Cooper GM, Hausman RE (2016) Chapter 19 Cancer. In: Cooper GM, Hausman RE (eds) The cell A molecular approach. Sunnderland, Sinauer Associates USA Inc, Massachusetts, pp 723–726
Nussbaumera S, Bonnabrya P, Veuthey JL, Fleury-Souveraina S (2011) Analysis of anticancer drugs; a review. Talanta 85(5):2265–2289
Miura K, Kinouchi M, Ishida K, Fujibuchi W, Naitoh T et al (2010) 5-FU metabolism in cancer and orally-administrable 5-FU drugs. Cancers 2(3):1717–1730
Grem JL (2000) 5-Fluorouracil: forty-plus and still ticking. A review of its preclinical and clinical development. Invest New Drugs 18(4):299–313
Cordier P-Y, Nau A, Ciccolini J, Oliver M, Mercier C, Lacarelle B, Peytel E (2011) 5-FU-induced neurotoxicity in cancer patients with profound DPD deficiency syndrome: a report of two cases. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68(3):823–826
Wohlhueter RM, Scott MR, Plagemann PG (1980) Facilitated transport of uracil and 5-fluorouracil, and permeation of orotic acid into cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Physiol 104(3):309–319
Heggie G, Sommadossi J-P, Cross DS, Huster WJ, Diasio RB (1987) Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. Can Res 47(8):2203–2206
Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Cancer 3(5):330
Houghton JA, Morton CL, Adkins DA, Rahman A (1993) Locus of the interaction among 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and interferon-alpha 2a in colon carcinoma cells. Can Res 53(18):4243–4250
Kufe DW, Major PP (1981) 5-Fluorouracil incorporation into human breast carcinoma RNA correlates with cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 256(19):9802–9805
Glazer RI, Lloyd LS (1982) Association of cell lethality with incorporation of 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluorouridine into nuclear RNA in human colon carcinoma cells in culture. Mol Pharmacol 21(2):468–473
Kanamaru R, Kakuta H, Sato T, Ishioka C, Wakui A (1986) The inhibitory effects of 5-fluorouracil on the metabolism of preribosomal and ribosomal RNA in L-1210 cells in vitro. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 17(1):43–46
Santi DV, Hardy LW (1987) Catalytic mechanism and inhibition of tRNA (uracil-5-) methyltransferase: evidence for covalent catalysis. Biochemistry 26(26):8599–8606
Randerath K, Tseng WC, Harris JS, Lu LJW (1983) Specific effects of 5-fluoropyrimidines and 5-azapyrimidines on modification of the 5 position of pyrimidines, in particular the synthesis of 5-methyluracil and 5-methylcytosine in nucleic acids. Book series (RECENTCANCER, vol 84) Modified Nucleosides and Cancer, pp 283–297
Sommer H, Santi DV (1974) Purification and amino acid analysis of an active site peptide from thymidylate synthetase containing covalently bound 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridylate and methylenetetrahydrofolate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 57(3):689–695
Santi DV, McHenry CS, Sommer H (1974) Mechanism of interaction of thymidylate synthetase with 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate. Biochemistry 13(3):471–481
Aherne GW, Hardcastle A, Raynaud F, Jackman AL (1996) Immunoreactive dUMP and TTP pools as an index of thymidylate synthase inhibition; effect of tomudex (ZD1694) and a non-polyglutamated quinazoline antifolate (CB30900) in L1210 mouse leukaemia cells. Biochem Pharmacol 51(10):1293–1301
Mitrovski B, Pressacco J, Mandelbaum S, Erlichman C (1994) Biochemical effects of folate-based inhibitors of thymidylate synthase in MGH-U1 cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 35(2):109–114
Matherly LH, Czajkowski CA, Muench SP, Psiakis JT (1990) Role for cytosolic folate-binding proteins in the compartmentation of endogenous tetrahydrofolates and the 5-formyl tetrahydrofolate-mediated enhancement of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine antitumor activity in vitro. Can Res 50(11):3262–3269
Park JG, Collins JM, Gazdar AF, Allegra CJ, Steinberg SM, Greene RF et al (1988) Enhancement of fluorinated pyrimidine induced cytotoxicity by leucovorin in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 80(19):1560–1564
Nadal J, Van GC, Pinedo H, Peters G (1988) In vivo potentiation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin in murine colon carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother 42(6):387–393
Dolnick BJ, Cheng YC (1978) Human thymidylate synthetase. II. Derivatives of pteroylmono- and -polyglutamates as substrates and inhibitors. J Biol Chem 253(10):3563–3567
Radparvar S, Houghton PJ, Houghton JA (1988) Effect of polyglutamylation of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate on the binding of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridylate to thymidylate synthase purified from a human colon adenocarcinoma xenograft. Biochem Pharmacol 38(2):335–342
Adjei AA (2001) A review of the pharmacology and clinical activity of new chemotherapy agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48(3):265–277
Spector T, Cao S, Rustum YM, Harrington JA, Porter DJ (1995) Attenuation of the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil by (R)-5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil. Can Res 55(6):1239–1241
Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Mori K et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34(8):1274–1281
Cao D, Russell RL, Zhang D, Leffert JJ, Pizzorno G (2002) Uridine phosphorylase (−/−) murine embryonic stem cells clarify the key role of this enzyme in the regulation of the pyrimidine salvage pathway and in the activation of fluoropyrimidines. Can Res 62(8):2313–2317
Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Maroun MK et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19(8):2282–2292
Gorlick R, Bertino JR (1999) Clinical pharmacology and resistance to dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. In: Jackman AL (ed) Antifolate Drugs in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Cadman E, Heimer R, Benz C (1981) The influence of methotrexate pretreatment on 5-fluorouracil metabolism in L1210 cells. J Biol Chem 256(4):1695–1704
Wolmark N, Bryant J, Smith R, Jean G, Allegra C, Hyams D et al (1998) Adjuvant 5 fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without interferon alfa-2a in colon carcinoma: national Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-05. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1810–1816
Shirasaka T, Nakano K, Takechi T, Satake H, Uchida J, Fujioka A et al (1996) Antitumor activity of 1 m Tegafur-0.4 m 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine-1 m potassium oxonate (S-1) against human colon carcinoma orthotopically implanted into nude rats. Cancer Res 56(11):2602–2606
Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, Yamaguchi M, Kato T, Yonekura K et al (1996) Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 7(5):548–557
Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Can Res 53(17):4004–4009
Omura K (2003) Clinical implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in 5-FU-based chemotherapy: mutations in the DPD gene, and DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines. Int J Clin Oncol 8(3):132–138
Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ (2005) Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352(5):476–487
Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, Abt M, Burris H, Carrato A et al (2005) Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 352(26):2696–2704
Wigmore P, Mustafa S, El-Bettagy M, Lyons L, Umka J, Bennett G (2010) Effects of 5-FU. Adv Exp Med Biol 6:871–881
Diasio RB (1998) The role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) modulation in 5-FU pharmacology. Cancer Network 12(10):23–27
Alsanosi SM, Skiffington C, Padmanabhan S (2014) Chapter 17—pharmacokinetic pharmacogenomics. Handbook Pharmacogenomics Stratified Med 341-364
Daher GC, Harris BE, Diasio RB (1990) Metabolism of pyrimidine analogues and their nucleosides. Pharmacol Ther 48(2):189–222
Diasio RB, Johnson MR (1999) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase: its role in 5-fluorouracil clinical toxicity and tumor resistance. Clin Cancer Res 5(10):2672–2673
Etienne MC, Lagrange JL, Dassonville O, Fleming R, Thyss A, Schneider NR et al (1994) Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 12(11):2248–2253
Lu Z, Zhang R, Diasio RB (1993) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and liver: population characteristics, newly identified deficient patients, and clinical implication in 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Can Res 53(22):5433–5438
Tuchman M, Stoeckeler JS, Kiang DT, O’Dea RF, Ramnaraine ML, Mirkin BL (1985) Familial pyrimidinemia and pyrimidinuria associated with severe fluorouracil toxicity. N Engl J Med 313(4):245–249
Diasio RB, Beavers TL, Carpenter JT (1988) Familial deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase Biochemical basis for familial pyrimidinemia and severe 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity. J Clin Investig 81(1):47–51
Pathania S, Bhatia R, Baldi A, Singh R, Rawal RK (2018) Drug metabolizing enzymes and their inhibitor’s role in cancer resistance. Biomed Pharmacol 105:53–65
Gonzalez FJ, Fernander-Salguero P (1995) Diagnostic analysis, clinical importance and molecular basis of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Trends Pharmacol Sci 16(10):325–327
Wasternack C (1980) Degradation of pyrimidines and pyrimidine analogs—pathways and mutual influences. Pharmacol Ther 8(3):629–651
Bakkere J, De Abreu R, Sengers R, Gabreëls F, Maas J, Renier W (1984) Elevated urine, blood and cerebrospinal fluid levels of uracil and thymine in a child with dihydrothymine dehydrogenase deficiency. Clin Chim Acta 140(3):247–256
Brockstedt M, Jakobs C, Smit LM, Gennip AH, Berger R (1990) A new case of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis 13(1):121–124
Meulendijks D, Henricks LM, Sonke GSJ, Deenem MJ, Froehlich TK, Amstutz U (2015) Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T > G, c.1236G > A/HapB3, and c.1601G > A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 16(16):1639–1650
Naguib FN, Kouni MH, Cha S (1985) Enzymes of uracil catabolism in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Cancer Research 45(11 Part 1):5405–5412
Harris B, Song R, Diasio R (1990) Relationship between dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and plasma 5-fluorouracil levels with evidence for circadian variation of enzyme activity and plasma drug levels in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil by protracted continuous infusion. Can Res 50(1):197–201
Uchida K, Danenberg PV, Danenberg KD, Grem JL (2008) Thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, ERCC1, and thymidine phosphorylase gene expression in primary and metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma tissue in patients treated on a phase I trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine. BMC Cancer 8(1):386
Yamashita T, Kato K, Long NK, Makita H, Yonemoto K, Iida K et al (2013) Effects of smoking and alcohol consumption on 5-fluorouracil-related metabolic enzymes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol 2(3):429–434
Shin JG, Kang T, Cheong H, Shin H, Park H, Na H et al (2015) Determination of DPYD enzyme activity in korean population. Ther Drug Monit 37(2):147–151
Li G-Y, Duan J-F, Li W-J, Liu T (2016) DPYD*2A/*5A/*9A and UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. J Cancer Res Therapeutics 12(2):782
Caudle K, Thorn C, Klein T, Swen J, McLeod H, Diasio R, Schwab M (2013) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype and fluoropyrimidine dosing. Clin Pharmacol Therapeutics 94(6):640–645
Ruzzo A, Grazianp F, Galli F, Galli FR, Lonardi S, Ranzoni M et al (2017) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase pharmacogenetics for predicting fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in the randomised, phase III adjuvant TOSCA trial in high-risk colon cancer patients. Br J Cancer 117(9):1269
Kuilenburg AB, Abreu RA, Gennip AH (2003) Pharmacogenetic and clinical aspects of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Ann Clin Biochem 40(1):41–45
Sulzyc-Bielicka V, Binczak-Kuleta A, Pioch W, Kladny J, Gziut K, Bielicki D et al (2008) 5-Fluorouracil toxicity-attributable IVS14 + 1G > A mutation of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in Polish colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacol Rep 60(238):238–242
Mattison L, Johnson M, Diasio RB (2002) A comparative analysis of translated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase cDNA; conservation of functional domains and relevance to genetic polymorphisms. Pharmacogenet Genomics 12(2):133–144
Baskin Y, Amirfallah A, Unal OU, Calibasi G, Oztop I (2015) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase 85T > C mutation is associated with ocular toxicity of 5-fluorouracil: a case report. Am J Ther 22(2):36–39
Milano G, Etienne MC (1994) Potential importance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in cancer chemotherapy. Pharmacogenet Genomics 4(6):301–306
Teh LK, Hamzah S, Hashim H, Bannur Z, Zakaria ZA, Hasbullani Z (2013) Potential of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotypes in Personalizing 5-Fluorouracil Therapy Among Colorectal Cancer Patients. Ther Drug Monit 35(5):624–630
Seck K, Riemer S, Kates R, Ullrich T, Lutz V, Harbeck N et al (2005) Analysis of the DPYD gene implicated in 5-Fluorouracil catabolism in a cohort of caucasian individuals. Clin Cancer Res 11(16):5886–5892
He YF, Wei W, Zhang X, Li YHS, Wang FH, Jiang WQ (2008) Analysis of the DPYD gene implicated in 5-fluorouracil catabolism in chinese cancer patients. J Clin Pharm Ther 33(3):307–314
Khallaf HH, He M, Wittenauer A, Woolley EE, Cunto M, Pervaiz MA (2013) An incidental case of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: one case, multiple challenges. Indian J Hum Genetics 19(4):483
Kuilenburg AB, Haasjes J, Richel DJ, Zoetekouw L, Lenthe HV, Abreu RA et al (2000) Clinical implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients with severe 5-fluorouracil-associated toxicity: identification of new mutations in the DPD gene. Clin Cancer Res 6(12):4705–4712
Ezzeldin H, Diasio R (2004) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, a pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with potentially life-threatening toxicity following 5-fluorouracil administration. Clin Colorectal Cancer 4(3):181–189
Collie-Duguid E, Johnston SJ, Powrie R, Milano G, Etienne MC, Rochat B et al (2000) Cloning and initial characterization of the human DPYD gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 271(1):28–35
Kuilenburg AB, Meinsma R, Zoetekouw L, Gennip AH (2002) Increased risk of grade IV neutropenia after administration of 5-fluorouracil due to a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: high prevalence of the IVS14 + 1g > a mutation. Int J Cancer 101(3):253–258
Mattison L, Soong R, Diasio RB (2002) Implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase on 5-fluorouracil pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 3(4):485–492
Kouwaki M, Hamajima N, Sumi S, Nonaka M, Sasaki M, Dobashi K et al (1998) Identification of novel mutations in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in a Japanese patient with 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Clin Cancer Res 4(12):2999–3004
Vreken P, Kuilenburg AB, Meinsma R, van Gennip AH (1997) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency: identification and expression of missense mutations C29R, R886H and R235W. Hum Genet 101(3):333–338
Loriot MA, Ciccolini J, Thomas F, Barin-Le-Guellec C, Royer B, Milano G et al (2018) Dihydropyrimidine déhydrogenase (DPD) deficiency screening and securing of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies: update and recommendations of the French GPCO-Unicancer and RNPGx networks. Bull Cancer 105(4):397–407
Morrison G, Bastian A, Dela Rosa T, Diasio RT (1997) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: a pharmacogenetic defect causing severe adverse reactions to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 24(1):83–88
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support received from the Central University of Punjab, Bhatinda, India, in writing this manuscript. We thank Dr Dinesh Babu, Assistant Professor, Department of English for reading and grammatically improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflicting interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, V., Gupta, S.K. & Verma, M. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in the metabolism of the anticancer drugs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 84, 1157–1166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03936-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03936-w