Abstract
Purpose
To report the early experience and mid-term outcomes of physician-modified fenestrated or branched endovascular repair (PM-F/BEVAR) for patients with post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (PD-TAAA).
Methods
PD-TAAA patients treated with PM-F/BEVAR between December 2014 and September 2020 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Out of the 39 patients, technical success defined as successful deployment of all stent grafts with patent target vessels (TVs) and exclusion of the lesion without type I or III endoleak was achieved in 35 patients (89.7%). A total of 126 TVs were successfully reconstructed. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Seven major adverse events occurred including one acute kidney injury, four renal infarctions, one retroperitoneal hematoma and one left renal artery occlusion. Seven type II endoleak and three type III endoleak were detected. During a mean 29.4 ± 15.5 months follow-up period, the mortality was zero. Three renal arteries and one external iliac artery occluded in four patients. No other new onset major adverse event occurred. No patient required reintervention. One type II endoleak spontaneously resolved, while the remaining six remained stable. One early type III endoleak diminished, and one new type III endoleak occurred at 2 months. The primary patency of TV was 96.8% (120/124). Shrinkage or stability of aneurysm diameter can be observed in 38 patients (97.4%). The false lumen thrombosis rate was 89.7% (35/39).
Conclusions
The present study showed encouraging results of PM-F/BEVAR for treatment of PD-TAAAs.
Level of Evidence
Level 4, Case Series.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
About 20–40% of patients who survive the acute phase of aortic dissection will develop aneurysmal dilatation of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta [1, 2]. Once the aorta is greater than 6 cm, the risk of aortic rupture is estimated to be 30% [2]. About 20–24% of patients require intervention after aortic dissection despite initial repair [3, 4].
Post-dissection aneurysms can be addressed by open surgery, which was technically demanding with considerable mortality and morbidity [5,6,7]. Endovascular techniques represent a less invasive alternative. Parallel stents techniques have been introduced with encouraging results to extend landing zone and preserve sidebranches [8]. However, the theoretical high risk of type Ia endoleak remains an inherent drawback. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) have played a growing role in the management of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (PD-TAAA) [9]. However, the custom made devices (CMDs) are limited by manufacturing delay and high cost, while the off-the-shelf devices failed to fit all anatomies [10]. Physician-modified fenestrated or branched stent graft (PMSG) represents an alternative option [11,12,13]. However, the relevant literature was limited [14,15,16].
The aim of this study was to present the initial experience and mid-term outcomes of F/BEVAR with PMSGs for patients with PD-TAAA in our center.
Materials and Methods
Patient Population
The present study is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. Prospectively maintained database in our center was reviewed, and patients receiving PM-F/BEVAR for PD-TAAA between December 2014 and September 2020 were identified.
Inclusion criteria were as follows:
-
(I)
Patients with TAAAs following aortic dissection extending through the visceral segment receiving endovascular treatment. Indications included (a) large aneurysms diameter (≥ 5 cm) or rapid growth of maximum aortic diameter (≥ 5 mm/ 6 months); (b) sidebranch malperfusion; (c) uncontrollable hypertension or repeated pain; (d) rupture or impending rupture;
-
(II)
Patients who underwent F/BEVAR with PMSGs.
Exclusion criteria were as follows:
-
(I)
Patients who underwent PM-F/BEVAR for treatment of degenerative TAAAs, penetrate ulcer, pseudoaneurysm and other aortic pathologies;
-
(II)
Patients treated with open surgery, hybrid operation and parallel stent graft technique.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by institutional ethics committee of our hospital and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE reporting guidelines.
Physician-Modified Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Repair Procedure
The PMSGs were prepared based on Ankura (Lifetech. Shenzhen, China) platform, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. The main steps were as follows:
-
(I)
One femoral access was prepared for PMSG deployment, while the contralateral femoral access and bilateral brachial arteries accesses for TVs reconstruction;
-
(II)
fourfranch catheters were placed into all TVs;
-
(III)
the PMSG was introduced and semi-deployed at the appropriate level and clock position;
-
(IV)
the TVs were cannulated across the fenestrations/branches and secured with Flexor sheaths (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA);
-
(V)
once the bridging stent grafts were introduced into the TVs, trigger wires were removed to release the posterior reducing wires to fully deploy the PMSG;
-
(VI)
the Viabahn (W.L. Gore Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) self-expandable covered stents or bare metal stents were deployed as bridging stents between the TVs and fenestrations or branches. Additional bare stent was not routinely used unless compression or kinking of the primary branch stent was detected.
One representative case of PM-F/BEVAR procedure is shown in Fig. 1.
A 2 cm length of normal aortic segment above the dissected aorta or previous existed proximal endograft or elephant trunk was considered as the proximal landing zone. For patients with high risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI), the aortic segment 2 cm above the celiac trunk was also considered as the proximal landing zone to reduce the length of aortic coverage. Although involved by dissection, the aortic segment may be strong enough in chronic phase. The oversize rate of PMSG was set on 5–10% based on the diameter of proximal landing zones. The stent grafting often extended distally to common iliac artery or even external iliac artery to cover the distal tear (Fig. 2). The LSA and at least one-side internal iliac artery (IIA) were intended to be preserved to decrease the risk of SCI. Needle-assisted in situ fenestration (ISF) was applied to reconstruct LSA for patients who received previous TEVAR covering the LSA. Physician-modified iliac branched device (IBD) or chimney technique was applied to preserve at least one-side IIA when bilateral IIAs should be covered with stent graft for distal extension of landing zone or distal tear exclusion, or when ipsilateral IIA should be covered with contralateral IIA occlusion or severe stenosis. In case of brisk retrograde flow into the false lumen (FL), adjunctive embolization of the FL with coils, glues and/or plugs was performed (Fig. 3).
Follow-Up
Demographic, anatomical, intra-operative, and postoperative data were recorded. All patients underwent computerized tomography (CT) scan preoperatively and before discharge. The follow-up protocol included CT scan at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. The follow-up clinical data were obtained during patient visits to the hospital, other hospital stays, or by telephone interview.
Outcome and Definition
The results were presented according to the guidelines for reporting standards in TEVAR [17, 18]. Technical success was defined as successful deployment of all stent grafts with patent TVs and exclusion of the lesion without type I or III endoleak in the completion angiogram. Major adverse events (MAEs) included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, renal function decline or new-onset dialysis, bowel ischemia, major stroke, paraplegia and other major complications. Renal infarction was defined as lack of perfusion in the kidney parenchyma using contrast angiography, CTA, or MRA. Acute kidney injury was defined as that serum creatinine increased to ≥ 150% from baseline. Target vessel stenosis less than 50% was defined as patency. Short term was defined as the first 30 postoperative days. The follow-up index was defined as the ratio between the investigated follow-up period and the theoretically possible follow-up period up to the pre-specified study end date [19]. Aorta status was classified as enlargement (maximum aortic diameter increasing greater than 5 mm at follow-up compared with baseline measurement), stable (changing < 5 mm) and shrinkage (decreasing > 5 mm).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 19.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were summarized as means ± standard deviations if normally distributed, and as median, and range if not. Categorical variables were expressed as count and percentage. Time-dependent outcomes were reported using Kaplan–Meier estimates.
Results
Between December 2014 and September 2020, 39 patients (74.4% male with mean age of 51.3 ± 12.5 years) were treated with PMSGs for PD-TAAA. Demographic characteristics and baseline clinical data are detailed in Table 1.
A total of 126 consecutive target vessels (TVs) were intended to be preserved by fenestration (n = 119, 94.4%) and branched stent grafts (n = 7, 5.6%). Grafts incorporated four TVs in 14 (35.9%) patients, three TVs in 20 (51.3%) patients, and two TVs in five patients (12.8%). The technical success was 89.7% (35/39) with no perioperative mortality. The reason for technical failure was failed renal arteries revascularization in two patients for hostile anatomy and severe stenosis leading to renal infarction and type III endoleaks found in completion aortography in three patients. FL embolization with coils with/without glue was used in 15 (38.5%) patients, while distal tear exclusion by plug and coils were simultaneously conducted in two (16.7%) patients. In four patients, a proximal stent graft was placed to partially expand the narrow true lumen before PMSG deployment. Six patients received previous Z2 TEVAR with (n = 4) or without (n = 2) LSA preservation. For the two patients, concomitant LSA reconstruction with needle-assisted ISF was conducted during PM-F/BEVAR procedure for repair of PD-TAAA. Six patients received internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction with physician-modified IBD (n = 4) or chimney technique (n = 2). The indications included stent grafting extension to bilateral IIAs in five patients and stent grafting extension to ipsilateral IIA with contralateral IIA occlusion in one patient. In all patients, the procedures were performed in one stage. A total of 124 TVs were successfully preserved with (n = 115) or without bridging stents placement (n = 9). Out of the 115 stented TVs, 104 were revascularized with one self-expandable covered stent (Viabahn) for each, eight with one bare metal stent for each, two with two bare metal stents for each, and one with a covered stent and a bare metal stent. Procedure details are presented in Table 2.
The thirty-day mortality was 0%. Seven major adverse events in five patients occurred within 30 days including one acute kidney injury, four renal infarctions, one retroperitoneal hematoma and one left renal artery occlusion. There were no stroke or SCI. No type I endoleak was observed via 30-day follow-up CTA, while seven type II endoleak and three type III endoleak were detected. These patients were left close follow-up without intervention considering the endoleak flow was mild. The patient suffering from retroperitoneal hematoma received reintervention 4 days after operation (Table 3).
The mean follow-up was 29.4 ± 15.5 months (12–69 months). All patients were followed up and the mean follow-up index was 1.0 ± 0.0. During follow-up period, no death occurred. The cumulative survival rate was 100.0% at one, three and five years according to Kaplan–Meier curves (Fig. 4A). Four new onset major adverse events occurred including one right external iliac artery occlusion at 3 months and three renal arteries occlusion at 3 months, 12 months, and 18 months, respectively. No stroke or SCI occurred in this series during follow-up. No patient received reintervention. The freedom from reintervention was 94.9% at one, three and five years (Fig. 4B). No type I endoleak occurred during follow-up. Out of the seven early type II endoleak, one spontaneously resolved while the remaining six remained stable. Out of three early type III endoleak, one diminished at 54 months, while the remaining two remained stable. One new type III endoleak occurred at 2 months. The freedom from type I or III endoleak was 89.7% at one, three and five years (Fig. 4C). Out of the 124 successfully revascularized TVs, 120 remained patent resulting in a follow-up primary patency rate of 96.8% (120/124). Of note, all 14 reconstructed TVs from FL were patent. The cumulative primary patency of TV was 97.6% at one, 96.4% at three and 96.4% at five years (Fig. 4D). No significant stenosis, kink, fracture and migration of stent was observed (Table 3).
The mean aneurysm diameters were 52.7 ± 16.7 mm preoperatively and 50.7 ± 18.0 mm at last follow-up (p = 0.001). As for the maximum aortic diameter, shrinkage (n = 15) or stable status (n = 23) was seen in 38 (97.5%) cases and enlargement was observed in one (2.6%) case (Table 3). The FL thrombosis rates were 89.7% (35/39) at last follow-up.
Discussion
F/BEVAR has now been increasingly used for patients with complex aortic disease [20, 21]. CMDs, off the shelf devices and PMSGs were the currently available options. Off the shelf devices cannot accommodate all the aortic anatomy, while CMDs were limited by manufacturing delay. Hence, PM-F/BEVAR can be considered as an option. Sénémaud and his colleges [22] revealed that the rates of intraoperative adverse events, mortality, complications, and reinterventions were in an acceptable range in the PMSG group based on their short-term results of 69 CMDs and 28 PMSGs for complex aortic aneurysm repair.
However, the published data about F/BEVAR for PD-TAAA using PMSGs were scarce. Yang et al. [16] has recently reported their short outcomes of 62 post-dissection aortic aneurysms patients treated with PMSGs demonstrating high technical success (98.3%), low 30-day mortality (1.6%), favorable 1-year follow-up FL thrombosis (91.8%) and survival rate (96.8%). Our results were also favorable and comparable, with a technical success rate of 89.7%, mortality of zero, major adverse event rate of 17.9%.
During the PM-F/BEVAR procedure, several assistant techniques were used in the present cohort to improve results. In chronic post-dissection aneurysms, the most specific feature is the narrow true lumen. A proximal tube graft was deployed first above the celiac trunk to expand the true lumen slightly, making full deployment of the main body of PMSG possible [14, 15]. Another feature is that visceral branches can originate from the FL. To enable successful catheterization of TVs originating from the FL, the dissection flap sometimes has to be perforated with a stiffer tip of a wire or a steerable needle (Lifetech, Shenzhen, China) supported by a guiding sheath [14]. Then, long covered stents were used to connect the fenestrations or directional branches to the TVs across the flap and FL.
SCI is a devastating complication, which often occurred after extensive endovascular repair [23]. Perioperative blood loss, lack of CSF drainage, hypotension, as well as procedure time and patient comorbidities may be associated with SCI [23,24,25]. To reduce risk of SCI, the LSA and at least one-side internal iliac artery was preserved as far as possible with fenestration, chimney or IBD technique. Further, prophylactic CSF drainage was applied in a proportion of patients. These measures may contribute to the relative low occurrence of SCI in this study.
The FL thrombosis of PD-TAAAs is another concern which was associated with aortic remodeling and long-term outcomes. To promote FL thrombosis, embolization of aneurysmal false lumen with coils or glues and distal residual tear exclusion with plug, coils or distal endograft was applied to block the persist retrograde blood flow from distal tears into FL [26]. In 17 patients with large FL or multiple distal tears, the FL or the distal tear was well dealt with the techniques mentioned before resulting in a FL thrombosis rate of 89.7%.
The high rates of endoleak and consequent reinterventions also raise some concerns. Type III endoleaks often occurred following FEVAR due to short junction between the main body stent graft and the bridging covered stent leading to a higher reintervention rate [27]. Therefore, branches were preferred rather than fenestration in patients with appropriate anatomy to reduce type III endoleaks. In the present case series, post-balloon dilation was employed to strengthen the junction between bridging stents and fenestrations/directional branches. The Viabahn used as bridging stents in this study have enough flexibility to well fit TVs’ anatomy, physiological movement and remodeling may also help reducing the risk of endoleaks [28].
In our study, the primary patency rate of TVs was 96.8% (120/124) with four renal arteries occlusion. According to the current literature, visceral branch patency remains high (> 98%), while renal branch patency varied. A number of factors was supposed to affect long-term branch patency, including anatomy of the TVs, the length and curvature of the branch component, and the type of bridging stents based on clinical observations [29]. There was a trend toward greater occlusion rates with cranially directed as opposed to caudally directed branches, and the length of the renal artery was slightly longer in the group with renal artery occlusions [30].
Limitations
There are some limitations of this study. This is a single-center, retrospective observational study with a relatively small sample size and short follow-up. In addition, it lacks comparison groups between CMDs and PMSGs. Further, the learning curve and surgeon experience may impact the results of the procedure.
Conclusion
The present study showed encouraging results of PM-F/BEVAR for treatment of PD-TAAAs. Favorable aortic remodeling with false lumen thrombosis and aneurysm regression can be observed with acceptable rates of target vessel occlusion, endoleak and reintervention. Nevertheless, more studies with longer follow-up and larger sample size are required to confirm the efficacy and durability of this procedure.
References
Song JM, Kim SD, Kim JH, et al. Long- term predictors of descending aorta aneurysmal change in patients with aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:799–804.
Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, et al. Management of acute aortic syndrome and chronic aortic dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:890–902.
Evangelista A, Salas A, Ribera A, et al. Long-term outcome of aortic dissection with patent false lumen: predictive role of entry tear size and location. Circulation. 2012;125:3133–41.
Fattori R, Cao P, De Rango P, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document on management of type B aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1661–78.
Estrera AL, Sandhu HK, Afifi RO, et al. Early and late outcomes after complete aortic replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:528–34.
Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, et al. Modern treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated endografting and open repair—a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:35–41.
Piazza M, Ricotta JJ 2nd. Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26(4):600–5.
Lobato AC, Camacho-Lobato L. A new technique to enhance endovascular thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm therapy-the sandwich procedure. Semin Vasc Surg. 2012;25(3):153–60.
Greenberg R, Eagleton M, Mastracci T. Branched endografts for thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(Suppl. 6):S171–8.
Bisdas T, Donas KP, Bosiers MJ, et al. Custom made versus off the shelf multibranched endografts for endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(5):1186–95.
Starnes BW. Physician modified endovascular grafts for the treatment of elective, symptomatic, or ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(3):601–7.
Starnes BW, Quiroga E. Hybrid-fenestrated aortic aneurysm repair: a novel technique for treating patients with paraanastomotic juxtarenal aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(8):1150–3.
Cochennec F, Kobeiter H, Gohel M, et al. Early results of physician modified fenestrated stent grafts for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(5):583–92.
Verhoeven EL, Paraskevas KI, Oikonomou K, et al. Fenestrated and branched stentgrafts to treat post dissection chronic aortic aneurysms after initial treatment in the acute setting. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:343–9.
Kitagawa A, Greenberg RK, Eagleton MJ, et al. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:625–34.
Yang G, Zhang M, Zhang Y, et al. Endovascular repair of post-dissection aortic aneurysms using physician-modified endografts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.016.
Fillinger MF, Greenberg RK, McKinsey JF, Chaikof EL. Society for vascular surgery Ad Hoc committee on TEVAR reporting standards. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4):1022–33.
Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):1048–60.
von Allmen RS, Weiss S, Tevaearai HT, Kuemmerli C, Tinner C, Carrel TP, Schmidli J, Dick F. Completeness of follow-up determines validity of study findings: results of a prospective repeated measures cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10): e0140817.
Oderich GS, Ribeiro M, Hofer J, et al. Prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts based on supraceliac sealing zones. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(5):1249–59.
Oderich GS, Ribeiro MS, Sandri GA, et al. Evolution from physician-modified to company-manufactured fenestrated-branched endografts to treat pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):31-42.e7.
Sénémaud JN, Ben Abdallah I, de Boissieu P, et al. Intraoperative adverse events and early outcomes of custom-made fenestrated stent grafts and physician-modified stent grafts for complex aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(6):1834-1842.e1.
Hiraoka T, Komiya T, Tsuneyoshi H, Shimamoto T. Risk factors for spinal cord ischaemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;27(1):54–9.
Kitpanit N, Ellozy SH, Connolly PH, Agrusa CJ, Lichtman AD, Schneider DB. Risk factors for spinal cord injury and complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(2):399-409.e1.
Katsargyris A, Oikonomou K, Kouvelos G, Renner H, Ritter W, Verhoeven EL. Spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and branched stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(6):1450–6.
Law Y, Tsilimparis N, Rohlffs F, Makaloski V, Behrendt CA, Heidemann F, Wipper SH, Debus ES, Kölbel T. Fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair for postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(2):404–12.
Baba T, Ohki T, Maeda K. Current status of endovascular treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Today. 2020;50(11):1343–52.
Donas KP, Pecoraro F, Torsello G, Lachat M, Austermann M, Mayer D, Panuccio G, Rancic Z. Use of covered chimney stents for pararenal aortic pathologies is safe and feasible with excellent patency and low incidence of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(3):659–65.
Eagleton MJ, Farivar B, Dias A. Large, single-center databases and the evolution of endovascular therapy for complex aortic aneurysms. Surgery. 2017;162(5):963–73.
Premprabha D, Sobel J, Pua C, et al. Visceral branch occlusion following aneurysm repair using multibranched thoracoabdominal stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21(6):783–90.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant No. 82000430), Major Science and Technology Project in Medical and Health of Zhejiang Province (co-constructed Project by Province and the Ministry, Grant No. 2020380400, WKJ-ZJ-2003), Key R&D Program of Zhejiang province (Grant No. 2019C03013) and the Health project of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2021KY673).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Seven authors have contributed significantly to the submitted work. The contribution of each author is as follows: Hongkun Zhang, Zhenjiang Li contributed to conception and design; Xiaohui Wang, Zhenjiang Li, Yangyan He, Yilang Xiang, and Tao Shang contributed to analysis and interpretation of data; Xiaohui Wang, Zhenjiang Li and Qianqian Zhu contributed to writing the article; Donglin Li, Lu Tian, and Hongkun Zhang contributed to critical revision of the article; Qianqian Zhu, Qinglong Zeng, and Ziheng Wu contributed to statistical analysis; Zhenjiang Li, Hongkun Zhang and Donglin Li obtained funding.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required. The study was approved by institutional ethics committee of our hospital.
Consent for Publication
Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xiaohui Wang and Qianqian Zhu contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Zhu, Q., He, Y. et al. Mid-term Outcomes of Physician-Modified Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Repair for Post-dissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 45, 1672–1681 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03232-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03232-w